General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); Electronic Contracting Initiative (ECI), 31879-31882 [2013-12566]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
on the high seas, if the owner is subject
to the jurisdiction of the United States,
must promptly report to the District
Commander, in whose jurisdiction the
obstruction is located, the action they
are taking to mark it in accordance with
this subchapter. The reported
information must contain the
information listed in paragraph (c) of
this section, including the information
required by 46 CFR 4.05.
(e) Owners and/or operators of other
obstructions may report the existence of
such obstructions and mark them in the
same manner as prescribed for sunken
vessels.
(f) Owners and/or operators of marine
pipelines that are determined to be
hazards to navigation must report and
mark the hazardous portion of those
pipelines in accordance with 49 CFR
parts 192 or 195, as applicable.
(g) All markings of sunken vessels,
rafts, or crafts and other obstructions
established in accordance with this
section must be reported to and
approved by the appropriate District
Commander.
(h) Should the District Commander
determine that these markings are
inconsistent with part 62 of this
subchapter, the markings must be
replaced as soon as practicable with
approved markings.
■ 3. Revise § 64.13 to read as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 64.13
Approval for waiver of markings.
(a) Owners and/or operators of sunken
vessels, rafts or other craft sunk in
navigable waters may apply to the
District Commander, in whose
jurisdiction the vessel, raft, or other
craft is located, for a waiver of the
requirement to mark them with a light
at night as required under § 64.11(a) of
this subpart. Information on how to
contact the District Commander is
available at https://www.uscg.mil/top/
units.
(b) The District Commander may grant
a waiver if it is determined that—
(1) marking the wrecked vessel, raft or
other craft with a light at night would
be impractical, and
(2) the granting of such a waiver
would not create an undue hazard to
navigation.
Dated: May 21, 2013.
Dana A. Goward,
Director, Maritime Transportation Systems,
U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2013–12545 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
the Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501–
4755. Please cite GSAR Case 2012–
G501.
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 501, 538, and 552
[GSAR Case 2012–G501; Docket 2013–0006;
Sequence 1]
RIN 3090–AJ36
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation (GSAR);
Electronic Contracting Initiative (ECI)
Office of Acquisition Policy,
General Services Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration (GSA) is proposing to
amend the General Services
Administration Acquisition Regulation
(GSAR) to add a Modifications (Federal
Supply Schedule) clause, and an
Alternate I version of the clause that
will require electronic submission of
modifications under Federal Supply
Schedule (FSS) contracts managed by
GSA. The public reporting burdens
associated with both the basic and
Alternate I clauses are also being
updated.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat on or before July 29, 2013 to
be considered in the formulation of a
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by GSAR Case 2012–G501,
Electronic Contracting Initiative, by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
by searching for ‘‘GSAR Case 2012–
G501’’. Follow the instructions provided
to ‘‘Submit a Comment’’. Please include
your name, company name (if any), and
‘‘GSAR Case 2012–G501’’, on your
attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: U.S. General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW.,
2nd Floor, ATTN: Hada Flowers,
Washington, DC 20405–0001.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite GSAR Case 2012–G501 in
all correspondence related to this case.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Dana Munson, General Services
Acquisition Policy Division, GSA, 202–
357–9652 or email
Dana.Munson@gsa.gov, for clarification
of content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31879
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
GSA is proposing to amend the GSAR
to add a Modifications (Federal Supply
Schedule) clause, and an Alternate I
version of the clause that requires
electronic submission of modifications
for FSS contracts managed by GSA. This
change is the result of modernized
technology that will improve the
process for submission of modifications
under the Federal Supply Schedules
Program, and was developed by GSA to
satisfy customer demands.
The basic clause (previously at GSAR
552.243–72) was removed during the
initial GSAR rewrite under proposed
rule 2006–G507 published in the
Federal Register at 74 FR 4596 on
January 26, 2009. The initial GSAR
rewrite proposed amendments to the
GSAR to update text addressing GSAR
Part 538. Withdrawal of GSAR case
2006–G507 was published in the
Federal Register at 77 FR 76446 on
December 28, 2012.
The basic clause is being reinstated at
GSAR 552.238–81, Modifications
(Federal Supply Schedule). The
alternate version of the clause
implements and mandates electronic
submission of modifications, and only
applies to FSS contracts managed by
GSA. The alternate version of the clause
links to GSA’s electronic tool, eMod at
https://eoffer.gsa.gov/. Use of eMod will
streamline the modification submission
process for both FSS contractors and
contracting officers.
Use of eMod will establish automated
controls in the modification process that
will ensure contract documentation is
completed and approved by all required
parties. Additionally, eMod will foster
GSA’s Rapid Action Modification
(RAM), which allows contracting
officers to process certain modification
requests to the FSS contract (e.g.,
administrative changes) as unilateral
modifications with no requirement for
contractor signature on the Standard
Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/
Modification of Contract (SF30).
Current and new FSS contractors will
be required to obtain a digital certificate
in order to comply with submission of
information via eMod. A digital
certificate is an electronic credential
that asserts the identity of an individual
and enables eMod to verify the identity
of the individual entering the system
and signing documents. The certificate
will be valid for a period of two years,
after which, contractors must renew the
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
31880
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
certificate at the associated cost during
that time. At present, two FSS vendors
are authorized to issue digital
certificates that facilitate the use of
eMod, at a price of $119 per issuance
and at renewals every two years. Having
a digital certificate creates digital
signatures which are verifiable. GSA has
developed training on eMod, and
obtaining a digital certificate. This
information is posted on GSA’s eOffer
Web site at https://eoffer.gsa.gov.
The Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) does not have access to eMod, and
is therefore not required to comply with
the requirements of the Alternate I
version of GSAR clause 552.238–81,
Modifications (Federal Supply
Schedule). VA will continue to utilize
the basic version of the clause in
management of their FSS contracts.
GSA is in the process of rewriting
each part of the GSAR and GSAM, and
as each GSAR part is rewritten, GSA
will publish it in the Federal Register
for comments. This rule covers the
rewrite of GSAR Part 538, Electronic
Contracting Initiative (Modifications).
On December 17, 2012, GSA
published in the Federal Register at 77
FR 74631 a request for public comments
on an information collection
requirement for a new OMB clearance.
One comment was received and is
addressed in the Paperwork Reduction
Act section of this notice.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The General Services Administration
does not expect this proposed rule to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the proposed rule will
implement a streamlined, electronic
process for submission and processing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
of modification requests pertaining to
FSS contracts managed by GSA.
However, small businesses will be
positively impacted by this initiative in
that the process for submitting
information is simplified, more
structured and easy to use, and
processing time is significantly reduced.
For example, submission of a paper
modification request is often a labor
intensive process that involves repeated
exchanges of information via standard
mail and/or facsimile. The electronic
process will include controls to prevent
submission of incomplete requests that
require follow-up.
Contractors will be able to offer the
latest products and services to the
Federal Government faster and more
often due to this streamlined
submission process.
Contractors will be required to obtain
a digital certificate in order to comply
with the eMod requirement. The cost of
the digital certificate will impose some
economic impact on all contractors,
both small and other than small, doing
business under Federal Supply
Schedule contracts managed by GSA.
Therefore, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) has been
prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603,
and is summarized as follows:
The General Services Administration
(GSA) is proposing to amend the General
Services Administration Acquisition
Regulation (GSAR) to add clause 552.238–81,
Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule)
back into the GSAR, and an alternate version
of the clause that requires electronic
submission of modifications for Federal
Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts managed by
GSA via eMod. The addition of the basic
clause is an administrative change that
reinstates a previous clause inadvertently
removed from the GSAR. The alternate clause
has never received public comment.
The alternate version of this clause
mandates electronic submission of
modifications through GSA’s electronic tool,
eMod. Use of eMod establishes automated
controls in the modification process that will
ensure contract documentation is completed
and approved by all required parties.
Additionally, eMod will foster Rapid Action
Modification (RAM), which allows
contracting officers to process certain
modifications (e.g., administrative changes)
as unilateral modifications with no
requirement for contractor signature on the
Standard Form 30, Amendment of
Solicitation/Modification of Contract (SF30).
eMod will streamline the process and result
in modification actions being processed more
timely and efficiently.
In addition to adding automated controls
into the modification process, mandating the
electronic submission of modifications will
support several Federal Acquisition Service
(FAS) initiatives that are currently underway
to enhance the MAS Program’s ability to
transition to a completely electronic
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contracting environment. These initiatives
include but are not limited to digitization of
Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) contract
files, Contracts Online, and the Enterprise
Acquisition Solution (EAS).
eMod is consistent with the Electronic
Signatures In Global and National Commerce
Act (E–SIGN), enacted on June 20, 2000, and
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Memoranda M–00–15, Guidance on
Implementing the Electronic Signatures,
dated September 25, 2000.
All of GSA’s FSS contractors (19,000) will
be required to obtain a digital certificate in
order to comply with this requirement.
Approximately 80 percent (15,200) GSA FSS
contracts are held by small businesses. A
digital certificate is an electronic credential
that enables eMod to verify the identity of the
individual entering the system and signing
documents. The certificate will be valid for
a period of two years, after which,
contractors must renew the certificate. At
present, two FSS vendors are authorized to
issue digital certificates that facilitate the use
of eMod, at a price of $119 per issuance. The
alternate version of this requirement does not
apply to FSS contracts managed by the
Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) because
the VA does not utilize or have access to
eMod.
The Regulatory Secretariat has
submitted a copy of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. GSA invites
comments from small business concerns
and other interested parties on the
expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
GSA will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. (GSAR Case 2012–
G501), in correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35) applies. The
proposed rule contains information
collection requirements. Accordingly,
the Regulatory Secretariat submitted a
request for approval of a revised
information collection requirement
concerning (GSAR 2012–G501;
Electronic Contracting Initiative) to the
Office of Management and Budget.
The 1st notice of the information
collection requirement was published in
the Federal Register at 77 FR 74631 on
December 17, 2012. The comment
period closed on February 15, 2013. One
comment was received. The commenter
suggested that GSA increase the
estimated burden hours per response to
reflect the additional time required for
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
complex modification requests. The
commenter also recommended that the
number of estimated respondents per
year be reduced, based on the logic that
companies with zero sales under their
contracts are not likely to submit
modification requests.
GSA responded that the estimate of
five burden hours per response already
takes into consideration that
modification requests can range from
simple administrative changes to more
complex changes involving the award of
additional products and services.
Additionally, the current estimate of
20,500 respondents per year is based on
the total number of contracts awarded
under the Federal Supply Schedule
program, and is utilized consistent with
other Federal Supply Schedule burden
calculations for clauses and provisions
applicable to all Federal Supply
Schedule contracts. No change to the
burden estimate was made as a result of
the comment.
However, the notice indicated that
20,500 contractors would use the basic
clause with an associated burden of 5
hours per response. This notice revises
the collection to explain that 1,500
contractors (VA contractors) will use the
basic clause with 5 hours of burden, and
19,000 contractors (GSA contractors)
will use the alternate clause with 4
hours of burden. This will result in a
total burden reduction for this
collection of 57,000 burden hours.
A 2nd notice of the information
collection requirement was published in
the Federal Register at 78 FR 18285 on
March 26, 2013. The comment period
closed on April 25, 2013. No comments
were received.
A. Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 5 hours per response for manual
modification requests and 4 hours per
response for eMod requests, including
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden is
estimated as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
552.238–81 Modifications (VA FSS
Contractors Manual process)
15:06 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
Government procurement.
Dated: May 22, 2013.
Steven J. Kempf,
Acting Senior Procurement Executive, Office
of Acquisition Policy, General Services
Administration.
Therefore, GSA proposes to amend 48
CFR parts 501, 538, and 552 as set forth
below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 501, 538, and 552 continues to
read as follows:
■
PART 501—GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION
REGULATION SYSTEM
552.238–81 Modifications Alternate I (GSA
FSS Contractors eMod Electronic process)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 501,
538, and 552
Authority: 40 U.S.C 121(c).
Respondents: 1,500.
Responses per Respondent: 3.
Total Responses: 4,500.
Hours per Response: 5.
Total Burden Hours: 22,500.
Estimated Respondents/yr: 19,000.
Number of Submissions per
Respondent: 3.
Total Responses: 57,000.
Estimated Hours/Response: 4.
Total Burden Hours: 228,000.
B. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden. Submit comments,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden, not later than July 29, 2013 to:
U.S. General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1800 F Street
NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
20405–0001.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the GSAR,
and will have practical utility; whether
our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
supporting statement from the General
Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Hada
Flowers, 1275 First Street NE., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20417. Please
cite OMB Control Number 3090–0302,
Modifications (Multiple Award
Schedules): GSAR Part Affected:
552.243–72, in all correspondence.
501.106
[Amended]
2. Amend section 501.106 in the table,
by adding in sequence, GSAR Reference
‘‘552.238–81’’ and its corresponding
OMB Control Number ‘‘3090–0320’’.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31881
PART 538—FEDERAL SUPPLY
SCHEDULE CONTRACTING
3. Amend section 538.273 by adding
paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
■
538.273
Contract clauses.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) 552.238–81, Modifications
(Federal Supply Schedule). Use
alternate I for Federal Supply Schedules
that only accept electronic
modifications.
PART 552—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
4. Add section 552.238–81 to read as
follows:
■
552.238–81
Schedule).
Modifications (Federal Supply
As prescribed in 538.273(b), insert the
following clause:
Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule)
(DATE)
(a) General. The Contractor may request a
contract modification by submitting a request
to the Contracting Officer for approval,
except as noted in paragraph (d) of this
clause. At a minimum, every request shall
describe the proposed change(s) and provide
the rationale for the requested change(s).
(b) Types of Modifications. (1) Additional
items/additional SINs. When requesting
additions, the following information must be
submitted:
(i) Information requested in paragraphs (1)
and (2) of the Commercial Sales Practice
Format to add SINs.
(ii) Discount information for the new
items(s) or new SIN(s). Specifically, submit
the information requested in paragraphs 3
through 5 of the Commercial Sales Practice
Format. If this information is the same as the
initial award, a statement to that effect may
be submitted instead.
(iii) Information about the new item(s) or
the item(s) under the new SIN(s) as described
in 552.212–70, Preparation of Offer (Multiple
Award Schedule), is required.
(iv) Delivery time(s) for the new item(s) or
the item(s) under the new SIN(s) must be
submitted in accordance with FAR 552.211–
78, Commercial Delivery Schedule (Multiple
Award Schedule).
(v) Production point(s) for the new item(s)
or the item(s) under the new SIN(s) must be
submitted if required by FAR 52.215–6, Place
of Performance.
(vi) Hazardous Material information (if
applicable) must be submitted as required by
FAR 52.223–3 (Alternate I), Hazardous
Material Identification and Material Safety
Data.
(vii) Any information requested by FAR
52.212–3(f), Offeror Representations and
Certifications—Commercial Items, that may
be necessary to assure compliance with FAR
52.225–1, Buy American Act—Balance of
Payments Programs—Supplies.
(2) Deletions. The Contractors shall provide
an explanation for the deletion. The
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
31882
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Government reserves the right to reject any
subsequent offer of the same item or a
substantially equal item at a higher price
during the same contract period, if the
contracting officer finds the higher price to
be unreasonable when compared with the
deleted item.
(3) Price Reduction. The Contractor shall
indicate whether the price reduction falls
under the item (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph
(c)(1) of the Price Reductions clause at
552.238–75. If the Price reduction falls under
item (i), the Contractor shall submit a copy
of the dated commercial price list. If the price
reduction falls under item (ii) or (iii), the
Contractor shall submit a copy of the
applicable price list(s), bulletins or letters or
customer agreements which outline the
effective date, duration, terms and conditions
of the price reduction.
(c) Effective dates. The effective date of any
modification is the date specified in the
modification, except as otherwise provided
in the Price Reductions clause at 552.238–75.
(d) Electronic File Updates. The Contractor
shall update electronic file submissions to
reflect all modifications. For additional items
or SINs, the Contractor shall obtain the
Contracting Officer’s approval before
transmitting changes. Contract modifications
will not be made effective until the
Government receives the electronic file
updates. The Contractor may transmit price
reductions, item deletions, and corrections
without prior approval. However, the
Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer as set forth in the Price Reductions
clause at 552.238–75.
(e) Amendments to Paper Federal Supply
Schedule Price Lists.
(1) The Contractor must provide
supplements to its paper price lists, reflecting
the most current changes. The Contractor
may either:
(i) Distribute a supplemental paper Federal
Supply Schedule Price List within 15
workdays after the effective date of each
modification.
(ii) Distribute quarterly cumulative
supplements. The period covered by a
cumulative supplement is at the discretion of
the Contractor, but may not exceed three
calendar months from the effective date of
the earliest modification. For example, if the
first modification occurs in February, the
quarterly supplement must cover February–
April, and every three month period after.
The Contractor must distribute each quarterly
cumulative supplement within 15 workdays
from the last day of the calendar quarter.
(2) At a minimum, the Contractor shall
distribute each supplement to those ordering
activities that previously received the basic
document. In addition, the Contractor shall
submit two copies of each supplement to the
Contracting Officer and one copy to the FSS
Schedule Information Center.
(End of Clause)
Alternate I (Date). As prescribed in
538.273(b)(3), add the following
paragraph (f) to the basic clause:
(f) Electronic submission of
modification requests is mandatory via
eMod (https://eOffer.gsa.gov), unless
otherwise stated in the electronic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
submission standards and requirements
at the Vendor Support Center Web site
(https://vsc.gsa.gov). If the electronic
submissions standards and
requirements information is updated at
the Vendor Support Center Web site,
Contractors will be notified prior to the
effective date of the change.
[FR Doc. 2013–12566 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–61–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
49 CFR Part 1333
[Docket No. EP 707]
Demurrage Liability
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
Initial regulatory flexibility
analysis and request for comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Board is publishing this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis to
aid the public in commenting on the
impact on small rail carriers, if any, of
the proposed rules on demurrage
liability.
DATES:
Comments are due by June 27,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy C. Ziehm at (202) 245–0391.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By
decision served on May 7, 2012, the
Surface Transportation Board (the
Board) issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) regarding demurrage
liability. Specifically, the Board
announced a proposed rule providing
that any person receiving rail cars from
a rail carrier for loading or unloading
who detains the cars beyond a specified
period of time may be held liable for
demurrage if that person has actual
notice of the terms of the demurrage
tariff providing for such liability prior to
the carrier’s placement of the rail cars.
Demurrage Liability, EP 707, slip op. at
10 (STB served May 7, 2012). The NPR
did not include an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA) pursuant to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, but
instead included a certification that the
proposed rules would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Id.,
slip op. at 17–18. The certification was
based on the fact that rail carriers would
be required to provide a one-time notice
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(electronic or written) to their
customers,1 and the Board noted that
these types of notices are generally
already provided, often electronically. A
review of the 2011 Waybill Sample
reveals that small rail carriers, as
defined by the Small Business
Administration,2 have an average of 10
terminating stations, which generally
equates to 10 customers. As such, the
burden imposed would be to provide
approximately 10 notices of a carrier’s
demurrage tariff, either electronically or
in writing, which is not significant.
Additionally, to the extent that their
existing tariffs conflict with the
proposed rules, rail carriers would need
to update their demurrage tariffs to
conform to the proposed rules.
In response to the NPR, the American
Short Line and Regional Railroad
Association (ASLRRA) submitted
comments in which it questioned the
necessity of imposing the actual notice
requirement on small carriers. ALSRRA
summarily argued that ‘‘small railroads
. . . often communicate with shippers
by telephone,’’ that Class III carriers are
‘‘sometimes less electronically
sophisticated,’’ and that ‘‘small
railroads, particularly those who are
acting as handling lines, may not even
know who the receiver is.’’ 3
The Board continues to believe that
its certification in the NPR is
appropriate because the impact of the
proposed rules would not be significant.
Nevertheless, the Board has decided to
publish the following analysis to
provide further information and
opportunity for public comment on the
impact on small rail carriers, if any, of
the rules. The Board notes that it
already afforded a period of public
comment on the proposed rules and that
this solicitation of comments is limited
to the impact on small rail carriers, if
any, of the rules.
1 The Paperwork Reduction Act and Regulatory
Flexibility Act sections of the NPR assumed that
rail carriers would only need to provide a one-time
notice. See, e.g., NPR at 21 (calculating burden
hours by assuming that it would take ‘‘railroads
eight hours to provide initial notice to its
customers’’). Many commenters asked for
clarification on whether rail carriers would need to
provide notice with each delivery of rail cars, or
whether a one-time notice would suffice. In this
IRFA, we are not deciding this issue, but only
noting that the analyses contained in the NPR were
based on the assumption that rail carriers would
only need to provide a one-time notice.
2 The Small Business Administration’s Office of
Size Standards has established a size standard for
rail transportation, pursuant to which a ‘‘line-haul
railroad’’ is considered small if its number of
employees is 1,500 or less, and a ‘‘short line
railroad’’ is considered small if its number of
employees is 500 or less. 13 CFR 121.201 (industry
subsector 482).
3 ASLRRA’s Comments 3–4.
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31879-31882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12566]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 501, 538, and 552
[GSAR Case 2012-G501; Docket 2013-0006; Sequence 1]
RIN 3090-AJ36
General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR);
Electronic Contracting Initiative (ECI)
AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, General Services Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is proposing to
amend the General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR)
to add a Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule) clause, and an
Alternate I version of the clause that will require electronic
submission of modifications under Federal Supply Schedule (FSS)
contracts managed by GSA. The public reporting burdens associated with
both the basic and Alternate I clauses are also being updated.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat on or before July 29, 2013 to be considered in
the formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by GSAR Case 2012-G501,
Electronic Contracting Initiative, by any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments by searching for ``GSAR Case 2012-G501''. Follow the
instructions provided to ``Submit a Comment''. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and ``GSAR Case 2012-G501'', on your
attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: U.S. General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor, ATTN: Hada
Flowers, Washington, DC 20405-0001.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite GSAR Case 2012-
G501 in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Dana Munson, General Services
Acquisition Policy Division, GSA, 202-357-9652 or email
Dana.Munson@gsa.gov, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite GSAR Case 2012-G501.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
GSA is proposing to amend the GSAR to add a Modifications (Federal
Supply Schedule) clause, and an Alternate I version of the clause that
requires electronic submission of modifications for FSS contracts
managed by GSA. This change is the result of modernized technology that
will improve the process for submission of modifications under the
Federal Supply Schedules Program, and was developed by GSA to satisfy
customer demands.
The basic clause (previously at GSAR 552.243-72) was removed during
the initial GSAR rewrite under proposed rule 2006-G507 published in the
Federal Register at 74 FR 4596 on January 26, 2009. The initial GSAR
rewrite proposed amendments to the GSAR to update text addressing GSAR
Part 538. Withdrawal of GSAR case 2006-G507 was published in the
Federal Register at 77 FR 76446 on December 28, 2012.
The basic clause is being reinstated at GSAR 552.238-81,
Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule). The alternate version of the
clause implements and mandates electronic submission of modifications,
and only applies to FSS contracts managed by GSA. The alternate version
of the clause links to GSA's electronic tool, eMod at https://eoffer.gsa.gov/. Use of eMod will streamline the modification
submission process for both FSS contractors and contracting officers.
Use of eMod will establish automated controls in the modification
process that will ensure contract documentation is completed and
approved by all required parties. Additionally, eMod will foster GSA's
Rapid Action Modification (RAM), which allows contracting officers to
process certain modification requests to the FSS contract (e.g.,
administrative changes) as unilateral modifications with no requirement
for contractor signature on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of
Solicitation/Modification of Contract (SF30).
Current and new FSS contractors will be required to obtain a
digital certificate in order to comply with submission of information
via eMod. A digital certificate is an electronic credential that
asserts the identity of an individual and enables eMod to verify the
identity of the individual entering the system and signing documents.
The certificate will be valid for a period of two years, after which,
contractors must renew the
[[Page 31880]]
certificate at the associated cost during that time. At present, two
FSS vendors are authorized to issue digital certificates that
facilitate the use of eMod, at a price of $119 per issuance and at
renewals every two years. Having a digital certificate creates digital
signatures which are verifiable. GSA has developed training on eMod,
and obtaining a digital certificate. This information is posted on
GSA's eOffer Web site at https://eoffer.gsa.gov.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) does not have access to
eMod, and is therefore not required to comply with the requirements of
the Alternate I version of GSAR clause 552.238-81, Modifications
(Federal Supply Schedule). VA will continue to utilize the basic
version of the clause in management of their FSS contracts.
GSA is in the process of rewriting each part of the GSAR and GSAM,
and as each GSAR part is rewritten, GSA will publish it in the Federal
Register for comments. This rule covers the rewrite of GSAR Part 538,
Electronic Contracting Initiative (Modifications).
On December 17, 2012, GSA published in the Federal Register at 77
FR 74631 a request for public comments on an information collection
requirement for a new OMB clearance. One comment was received and is
addressed in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of this notice.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The General Services Administration does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the proposed rule will implement a
streamlined, electronic process for submission and processing of
modification requests pertaining to FSS contracts managed by GSA.
However, small businesses will be positively impacted by this
initiative in that the process for submitting information is
simplified, more structured and easy to use, and processing time is
significantly reduced. For example, submission of a paper modification
request is often a labor intensive process that involves repeated
exchanges of information via standard mail and/or facsimile. The
electronic process will include controls to prevent submission of
incomplete requests that require follow-up.
Contractors will be able to offer the latest products and services
to the Federal Government faster and more often due to this streamlined
submission process.
Contractors will be required to obtain a digital certificate in
order to comply with the eMod requirement. The cost of the digital
certificate will impose some economic impact on all contractors, both
small and other than small, doing business under Federal Supply
Schedule contracts managed by GSA. Therefore, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) has been prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C.
603, and is summarized as follows:
The General Services Administration (GSA) is proposing to amend
the General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to
add clause 552.238-81, Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule) back
into the GSAR, and an alternate version of the clause that requires
electronic submission of modifications for Federal Supply Schedule
(FSS) contracts managed by GSA via eMod. The addition of the basic
clause is an administrative change that reinstates a previous clause
inadvertently removed from the GSAR. The alternate clause has never
received public comment.
The alternate version of this clause mandates electronic
submission of modifications through GSA's electronic tool, eMod. Use
of eMod establishes automated controls in the modification process
that will ensure contract documentation is completed and approved by
all required parties. Additionally, eMod will foster Rapid Action
Modification (RAM), which allows contracting officers to process
certain modifications (e.g., administrative changes) as unilateral
modifications with no requirement for contractor signature on the
Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract
(SF30). eMod will streamline the process and result in modification
actions being processed more timely and efficiently.
In addition to adding automated controls into the modification
process, mandating the electronic submission of modifications will
support several Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) initiatives that
are currently underway to enhance the MAS Program's ability to
transition to a completely electronic contracting environment. These
initiatives include but are not limited to digitization of Multiple
Award Schedule (MAS) contract files, Contracts Online, and the
Enterprise Acquisition Solution (EAS).
eMod is consistent with the Electronic Signatures In Global and
National Commerce Act (E-SIGN), enacted on June 20, 2000, and the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memoranda M-00-15, Guidance on
Implementing the Electronic Signatures, dated September 25, 2000.
All of GSA's FSS contractors (19,000) will be required to obtain
a digital certificate in order to comply with this requirement.
Approximately 80 percent (15,200) GSA FSS contracts are held by
small businesses. A digital certificate is an electronic credential
that enables eMod to verify the identity of the individual entering
the system and signing documents. The certificate will be valid for
a period of two years, after which, contractors must renew the
certificate. At present, two FSS vendors are authorized to issue
digital certificates that facilitate the use of eMod, at a price of
$119 per issuance. The alternate version of this requirement does
not apply to FSS contracts managed by the Department of Veteran
Affairs (VA) because the VA does not utilize or have access to eMod.
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy of the IRFA may
be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. GSA invites comments from
small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected
impact of this rule on small entities.
GSA will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. (GSAR Case 2012-G501),
in correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) applies. The
proposed rule contains information collection requirements.
Accordingly, the Regulatory Secretariat submitted a request for
approval of a revised information collection requirement concerning
(GSAR 2012-G501; Electronic Contracting Initiative) to the Office of
Management and Budget.
The 1st notice of the information collection requirement was
published in the Federal Register at 77 FR 74631 on December 17, 2012.
The comment period closed on February 15, 2013. One comment was
received. The commenter suggested that GSA increase the estimated
burden hours per response to reflect the additional time required for
[[Page 31881]]
complex modification requests. The commenter also recommended that the
number of estimated respondents per year be reduced, based on the logic
that companies with zero sales under their contracts are not likely to
submit modification requests.
GSA responded that the estimate of five burden hours per response
already takes into consideration that modification requests can range
from simple administrative changes to more complex changes involving
the award of additional products and services. Additionally, the
current estimate of 20,500 respondents per year is based on the total
number of contracts awarded under the Federal Supply Schedule program,
and is utilized consistent with other Federal Supply Schedule burden
calculations for clauses and provisions applicable to all Federal
Supply Schedule contracts. No change to the burden estimate was made as
a result of the comment.
However, the notice indicated that 20,500 contractors would use the
basic clause with an associated burden of 5 hours per response. This
notice revises the collection to explain that 1,500 contractors (VA
contractors) will use the basic clause with 5 hours of burden, and
19,000 contractors (GSA contractors) will use the alternate clause with
4 hours of burden. This will result in a total burden reduction for
this collection of 57,000 burden hours.
A 2nd notice of the information collection requirement was
published in the Federal Register at 78 FR 18285 on March 26, 2013. The
comment period closed on April 25, 2013. No comments were received.
A. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 5 hours per response for manual modification
requests and 4 hours per response for eMod requests, including the time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows:
552.238-81 Modifications (VA FSS Contractors Manual process)
Respondents: 1,500.
Responses per Respondent: 3.
Total Responses: 4,500.
Hours per Response: 5.
Total Burden Hours: 22,500.
552.238-81 Modifications Alternate I (GSA FSS Contractors eMod
Electronic process)
Estimated Respondents/yr: 19,000.
Number of Submissions per Respondent: 3.
Total Responses: 57,000.
Estimated Hours/Response: 4.
Total Burden Hours: 228,000.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden. Submit
comments, including suggestions for reducing this burden, not later
than July 29, 2013 to: U.S. General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat Division (MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd
Floor, Washington, DC 20405-0001.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the GSAR, and will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Requesters may obtain a copy of the supporting statement from the
General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN:
Hada Flowers, 1275 First Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Please cite OMB Control Number 3090-0302, Modifications (Multiple Award
Schedules): GSAR Part Affected: 552.243-72, in all correspondence.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 501, 538, and 552
Government procurement.
Dated: May 22, 2013.
Steven J. Kempf,
Acting Senior Procurement Executive, Office of Acquisition Policy,
General Services Administration.
Therefore, GSA proposes to amend 48 CFR parts 501, 538, and 552 as
set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 501, 538, and 552 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C 121(c).
PART 501--GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION REGULATION
SYSTEM
501.106 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 501.106 in the table, by adding in sequence, GSAR
Reference ``552.238-81'' and its corresponding OMB Control Number
``3090-0320''.
PART 538--FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACTING
0
3. Amend section 538.273 by adding paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
538.273 Contract clauses.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) 552.238-81, Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule). Use
alternate I for Federal Supply Schedules that only accept electronic
modifications.
PART 552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
4. Add section 552.238-81 to read as follows:
552.238-81 Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule).
As prescribed in 538.273(b), insert the following clause:
Modifications (Federal Supply Schedule) (DATE)
(a) General. The Contractor may request a contract modification
by submitting a request to the Contracting Officer for approval,
except as noted in paragraph (d) of this clause. At a minimum, every
request shall describe the proposed change(s) and provide the
rationale for the requested change(s).
(b) Types of Modifications. (1) Additional items/additional
SINs. When requesting additions, the following information must be
submitted:
(i) Information requested in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the
Commercial Sales Practice Format to add SINs.
(ii) Discount information for the new items(s) or new SIN(s).
Specifically, submit the information requested in paragraphs 3
through 5 of the Commercial Sales Practice Format. If this
information is the same as the initial award, a statement to that
effect may be submitted instead.
(iii) Information about the new item(s) or the item(s) under the
new SIN(s) as described in 552.212-70, Preparation of Offer
(Multiple Award Schedule), is required.
(iv) Delivery time(s) for the new item(s) or the item(s) under
the new SIN(s) must be submitted in accordance with FAR 552.211-78,
Commercial Delivery Schedule (Multiple Award Schedule).
(v) Production point(s) for the new item(s) or the item(s) under
the new SIN(s) must be submitted if required by FAR 52.215-6, Place
of Performance.
(vi) Hazardous Material information (if applicable) must be
submitted as required by FAR 52.223-3 (Alternate I), Hazardous
Material Identification and Material Safety Data.
(vii) Any information requested by FAR 52.212-3(f), Offeror
Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items, that may be
necessary to assure compliance with FAR 52.225-1, Buy American Act--
Balance of Payments Programs--Supplies.
(2) Deletions. The Contractors shall provide an explanation for
the deletion. The
[[Page 31882]]
Government reserves the right to reject any subsequent offer of the
same item or a substantially equal item at a higher price during the
same contract period, if the contracting officer finds the higher
price to be unreasonable when compared with the deleted item.
(3) Price Reduction. The Contractor shall indicate whether the
price reduction falls under the item (i), (ii), or (iii) of
paragraph (c)(1) of the Price Reductions clause at 552.238-75. If
the Price reduction falls under item (i), the Contractor shall
submit a copy of the dated commercial price list. If the price
reduction falls under item (ii) or (iii), the Contractor shall
submit a copy of the applicable price list(s), bulletins or letters
or customer agreements which outline the effective date, duration,
terms and conditions of the price reduction.
(c) Effective dates. The effective date of any modification is
the date specified in the modification, except as otherwise provided
in the Price Reductions clause at 552.238-75.
(d) Electronic File Updates. The Contractor shall update
electronic file submissions to reflect all modifications. For
additional items or SINs, the Contractor shall obtain the
Contracting Officer's approval before transmitting changes. Contract
modifications will not be made effective until the Government
receives the electronic file updates. The Contractor may transmit
price reductions, item deletions, and corrections without prior
approval. However, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer as set forth in the Price Reductions clause at 552.238-75.
(e) Amendments to Paper Federal Supply Schedule Price Lists.
(1) The Contractor must provide supplements to its paper price
lists, reflecting the most current changes. The Contractor may
either:
(i) Distribute a supplemental paper Federal Supply Schedule
Price List within 15 workdays after the effective date of each
modification.
(ii) Distribute quarterly cumulative supplements. The period
covered by a cumulative supplement is at the discretion of the
Contractor, but may not exceed three calendar months from the
effective date of the earliest modification. For example, if the
first modification occurs in February, the quarterly supplement must
cover February-April, and every three month period after. The
Contractor must distribute each quarterly cumulative supplement
within 15 workdays from the last day of the calendar quarter.
(2) At a minimum, the Contractor shall distribute each
supplement to those ordering activities that previously received the
basic document. In addition, the Contractor shall submit two copies
of each supplement to the Contracting Officer and one copy to the
FSS Schedule Information Center.
(End of Clause)
Alternate I (Date). As prescribed in 538.273(b)(3), add the
following paragraph (f) to the basic clause:
(f) Electronic submission of modification requests is mandatory via
eMod (https://eOffer.gsa.gov), unless otherwise stated in the electronic
submission standards and requirements at the Vendor Support Center Web
site (https://vsc.gsa.gov). If the electronic submissions standards and
requirements information is updated at the Vendor Support Center Web
site, Contractors will be notified prior to the effective date of the
change.
[FR Doc. 2013-12566 Filed 5-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-P