Draft Guidance for Industry on Contract Manufacturing Arrangements for Drugs: Quality Agreements; Availability, 31943-31944 [2013-12539]
Download as PDF
31943
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices
This current 60-Day Federal Register
Notice covers two new instruments:
ANNUAL BURDEN: CURRENT REQUEST
Annual
number of
respondents
Activity/respondent
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
burden hours
IMPACT
Responsible Fatherhood Grantee Impact Evaluation
(19) Follow-up survey:
Study participants .....................................................................................
1,600
1
0.75
1,200
Healthy Marriage Grantee Impact Evaluation
1,600
1
0.75
1,200
Total ...................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(20) RF study MIS:
Study participants .....................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
2,400
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours
(for instruments previously approved
and currently in use, instruments
currently under review, and those
associated with this 60-Day Notice):
15,516.
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer.
Email address:
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Steven M. Hanmer,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–12588 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–0558]
Draft Guidance for Industry on
Contract Manufacturing Arrangements
for Drugs: Quality Agreements;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for
industry entitled ‘‘Contract
Manufacturing Arrangements for Drugs:
Quality Agreements.’’ This guidance
describes our current thinking on
defining, establishing, and documenting
the responsibilities of each party (or all
parties) involved in the contract
manufacturing of drugs subject to
Current Good Manufacturing Practice
(CGMP). In particular, we describe how
parties involved in the contract
manufacturing of drugs can utilize
Quality Agreements to delineate their
responsibilities and assure drug quality,
safety, and efficacy.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on this draft
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002; or Office
of Communication, Outreach and
Development (HFM–40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N,
Rockville, MD 20852–1448; or
Communications Staff (HFV–12), Center
for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), Food
and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your requests. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the draft
guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula Katz, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Bldg. 51, Rm. 4314, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD
20993, 301–796–6972; or Stephen
Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research (HFM–17), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
Suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852–1448,
301–827–6210; or Jonathan Bray, Center
for Veterinary Medicine (HFV–232),
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
31944
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices
Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–
276–9228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Contract Manufacturing Arrangements
for Drugs: Quality Agreements.’’ This
draft guidance describes the FDA’s
current thinking on defining,
establishing, and documenting the
responsibilities of each party (or all
parties) involved in the contract
manufacturing of drugs subject to
CGMP. Although written Quality
Agreements are not explicitly required
under existing CGMP regulations for
human drugs and do not relieve any
party to a contract of their
responsibilities under CGMPs or under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act, this draft guidance explains how
Owners and Contracted Facilities can
draw on quality management principles
to carry out the complicated process of
contract drug manufacturing by
defining, establishing, and documenting
the responsibilities of all parties
involved in drug manufacturing, testing,
or other support operations. In
particular, this guidance describes
FDA’s recommendation that Owners
and Contracted Facilities implement
written Quality Agreements as a tool to
delineate responsibilities and assure the
quality, safety, and effectiveness of drug
products.
We are considering including
examples or references to examples of
Quality Agreements in the guidance.
Stakeholders are encouraged to provide
specific comments on publicly available
and useful Quality Agreements for
contract arrangements for the
manufacturing of drugs.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the Agency’s current thinking
on this topic. It does not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public.
An alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
III. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and have been
approved under OMB control numbers
0910–0014 and 0910–0001.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm, https://
www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
Information/Guidances/default.htm,
https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 21, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–12539 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0347]
International Conference on
Harmonisation; Guidance on Q4B
Evaluation and Recommendation of
Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the
International Conference on
Harmonisation Regions; Annex 13 on
Bulk Density and Tapped Density of
Powders General Chapter; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance entitled ‘‘Q4B
Evaluation and Recommendation of
Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the
International Conference on
Harmonisation Regions; Annex 13: Bulk
Density and Tapped Density of Powders
General Chapter.’’ The guidance was
prepared under the auspices of the
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Conference on
Harmonisation of Technical
Requirements for Registration of
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH).
The guidance provides the results of the
ICH Q4B evaluation of the Bulk Density
and Tapped Density of Powders General
Chapter harmonized text from each of
the three pharmacopoeias (United
States, European, and Japanese)
represented by the Pharmacopoeial
Discussion Group (PDG). The guidance
conveys recognition of the three
pharmacopoeial methods by the three
ICH regulatory regions and provides
specific information regarding the
recognition. The guidance is intended to
recognize the interchangeability
between the local regional
pharmacopoeias, thus avoiding
redundant testing in favor of a common
testing strategy in each regulatory
region. The guidance is in the form of
an annex to the core guidance on the
Q4B process entitled ‘‘Q4B Evaluation
and Recommendation of
Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the
ICH Regions (core ICH Q4B guidance).
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Division of Drug Information (HFD–
240), Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER), Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, or the Office of
Communication, Outreach and
Development (HFM–40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N,
Rockville, MD 20852–1448. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist
the office in processing your requests.
The guidance may also be obtained by
mail by calling CBER at 1–800–835–
4709 or 301–827–1800. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the guidance
document.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Robert King,
Sr., Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 4150, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–1242; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31943-31944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12539]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-0558]
Draft Guidance for Industry on Contract Manufacturing
Arrangements for Drugs: Quality Agreements; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Contract
Manufacturing Arrangements for Drugs: Quality Agreements.'' This
guidance describes our current thinking on defining, establishing, and
documenting the responsibilities of each party (or all parties)
involved in the contract manufacturing of drugs subject to Current Good
Manufacturing Practice (CGMP). In particular, we describe how parties
involved in the contract manufacturing of drugs can utilize Quality
Agreements to delineate their responsibilities and assure drug quality,
safety, and efficacy.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; or
Office of Communication, Outreach and Development (HFM-40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-1448; or
Communications Staff (HFV-12), Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM),
Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Katz, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Bldg. 51, Rm. 4314, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-6972; or Stephen
Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-17), Food and
Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N, Rockville, MD
20852-1448, 301-827-6210; or Jonathan Bray, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-232),
[[Page 31944]]
Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,
240-276-9228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Contract Manufacturing Arrangements for Drugs: Quality
Agreements.'' This draft guidance describes the FDA's current thinking
on defining, establishing, and documenting the responsibilities of each
party (or all parties) involved in the contract manufacturing of drugs
subject to CGMP. Although written Quality Agreements are not explicitly
required under existing CGMP regulations for human drugs and do not
relieve any party to a contract of their responsibilities under CGMPs
or under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, this draft guidance
explains how Owners and Contracted Facilities can draw on quality
management principles to carry out the complicated process of contract
drug manufacturing by defining, establishing, and documenting the
responsibilities of all parties involved in drug manufacturing,
testing, or other support operations. In particular, this guidance
describes FDA's recommendation that Owners and Contracted Facilities
implement written Quality Agreements as a tool to delineate
responsibilities and assure the quality, safety, and effectiveness of
drug products.
We are considering including examples or references to examples of
Quality Agreements in the guidance. Stakeholders are encouraged to
provide specific comments on publicly available and useful Quality
Agreements for contract arrangements for the manufacturing of drugs.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on this topic.
It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be
used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
III. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and
have been approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0014 and 0910-0001.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/default.htm, or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 21, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-12539 Filed 5-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P