Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Taunton River, Fall River and Somerset, MA, 31457-31459 [2013-12397]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
31457
1. Submitting Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Massachusetts. The bridge owner,
Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to
reduce the hours the bridge is crewed
based upon infrequent requests to open
the draw. It is expected that this change
to the regulations would provide relief
to the bridge owner from crewing the
bridge while continuing to meet the
reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0291 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. John W.
McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District Bridge Program,
telephone 617–223–8364, email
john.w.mcdonald@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Coast Guard
Tables of Acronyms
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0291) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit either
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of significant
environmental impact from the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 33 CFR 117.791 paragraph
(e) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.791
Hudson River.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The draw of the highway bridge
(Troy Green Island), mile 152.7, across
the Hudson River between Troy and
Green Island, operates as follows:
(1) From April 1 through December 15
the draw shall open on signal if at least
a twenty four hour advance notice is
given by calling the number posted at
the bridge.
(2) From December 16 through March
31, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessel traffic.
■ 3. In § 117.791, remove paragraph (f).
Dated: May 10, 2013.
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–12394 Filed 5–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0291]
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Taunton River, Fall River and
Somerset, MA
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the Veterans Memorial Bridge
across the Taunton River, mile 2.1,
between Fall River and Somerset,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2013–0291),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2013–0291 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31458
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Basis and Purpose
The Veterans Memorial Bridge at mile
2.1, across the Taunton River between
Somerset and Fall River, Massachusetts,
has a vertical clearance of 60 feet at
mean high water and 66 feet at mean
low water. The horizontal clearance is
200 feet between the bridge protective
fenders. The drawbridge operation
regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.5.
The waterway users are
predominantly seasonal recreational
vessels.
The Veterans Memorial Bridge is a
double leaf bascule highway bridge
opened to traffic in 2011, at mile 2.1,
upstream from the existing Brightman
Street Route 6 highway bridge at mile
1.8, across the Taunton River.
The owner of the bridge,
Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to
the Coast Guard to change the
drawbridge operating regulations that
presently require the draw to be crewed
twenty four hours a day and open on
signal at all times.
Under this proposed rule the draw
would open on signal between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., and from 3 p.m. through 7
a.m. the draw would open on signal
after at least a two hour advance notice
is given by calling the number posted at
the bridge.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change
the drawbridge operation regulations at
33 CFR 117.619 by adding a paragraph,
(f), that would allow the draw to be
crewed between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., and
be on a two hour on call basis at all
other times.
As a result of the seasonal recreational
vessel traffic and the high vertical
clearance under the bridge, 60 feet at
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
mean high water and 66 feet at mean
low water, the bridge has received few
requests to open during the past two
years since it was opened to vehicular
traffic.
Since the bridge opened it has
received the following number of
requests to open: 21 openings in 2011,
22 openings in 2012 and 4 openings in
2013, January through March.
Based on the above information, the
Coast Guard believes it is reasonable to
allow the Veterans Memorial Bridge to
be crewed between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.
and be on a two hour advance notice at
all other times. This decision was based
on the few number requests to open the
bridge the past two years and the high
vertical clearance under the draw.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866, or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders. We believe that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action
because the bridge will still open for all
vessel traffic at all times provided the
advance notice is given 3 p.m. to 7 a.m.
by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
operators of vessels needing to transit
through the bridge.
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: The bridge will
continue to open on signal from 7 a.m.
to 3 p.m. and from 3 p.m. to 7 a.m. after
a two hour advance notice is given.
Additionally, the bridge has a vertical
clearance of 60 feet at mean high water
and 66 feet at mean low water which
allows many vessels to pass through the
bridge without a need for an opening.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
31459
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
14. Environment
40 CFR Part 52
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of significant
environmental impact from the
proposed rule.
[EPA–R01–OAR–2010–0460; A–1–FRL–
9817–2]
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 33 CFR 117.619, add paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.619
Taunton River.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The draw of the Veterans Memorial
Bridge, mile 2.1, across the Taunton
River between Fall River and Somerset,
shall operate as follows:
(1) From 7 a.m. through 3 p.m. the
draw shall open on signal.
(2) From 3 p.m. through 7 a.m. the
draw shall open on signal provided a
two hour advance notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
Dated: May 10, 2013.
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–12397 Filed 5–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; Reasonably Available
Control Technology Update To
Address Control Techniques
Guidelines Issued in 2006, 2007, and
2008
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Connecticut. This revision establishes
and requires Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) for several
categories of volatile organic compound
(VOC) sources. The intended effect of
this action is to propose approval of
these requirements into the Connecticut
SIP. This action is being taken in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 24, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R01–OAR–2010–0460 by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: arnold.anne@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918–0047.
4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification
Number EPA–R01–OAR–2010–0460’’,
Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5
Post Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail
code OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–
3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA New England Regional Office,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air
Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, (mail code OEP05–
2), Boston, MA 02109–3912. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2010–
0460. EPA’s policy is that all comments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 101 (Friday, May 24, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31457-31459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12397]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0291]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Taunton River, Fall River and
Somerset, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the Veterans Memorial Bridge across the Taunton River, mile
2.1, between Fall River and Somerset, Massachusetts. The bridge owner,
Massachusetts Department of Transportation, submitted a request to
reduce the hours the bridge is crewed based upon infrequent requests to
open the draw. It is expected that this change to the regulations would
provide relief to the bridge owner from crewing the bridge while
continuing to meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2013-0291 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. John W. McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District Bridge Program, telephone 617-223-8364, email
john.w.mcdonald@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tables of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2013-0291), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2013-0291 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0291) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit either the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.
[[Page 31458]]
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Veterans Memorial Bridge at mile 2.1, across the Taunton River
between Somerset and Fall River, Massachusetts, has a vertical
clearance of 60 feet at mean high water and 66 feet at mean low water.
The horizontal clearance is 200 feet between the bridge protective
fenders. The drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR
117.5.
The waterway users are predominantly seasonal recreational vessels.
The Veterans Memorial Bridge is a double leaf bascule highway
bridge opened to traffic in 2011, at mile 2.1, upstream from the
existing Brightman Street Route 6 highway bridge at mile 1.8, across
the Taunton River.
The owner of the bridge, Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to the Coast Guard to change the
drawbridge operating regulations that presently require the draw to be
crewed twenty four hours a day and open on signal at all times.
Under this proposed rule the draw would open on signal between 7
a.m. and 3 p.m., and from 3 p.m. through 7 a.m. the draw would open on
signal after at least a two hour advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change the drawbridge operation
regulations at 33 CFR 117.619 by adding a paragraph, (f), that would
allow the draw to be crewed between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., and be on a two
hour on call basis at all other times.
As a result of the seasonal recreational vessel traffic and the
high vertical clearance under the bridge, 60 feet at mean high water
and 66 feet at mean low water, the bridge has received few requests to
open during the past two years since it was opened to vehicular
traffic.
Since the bridge opened it has received the following number of
requests to open: 21 openings in 2011, 22 openings in 2012 and 4
openings in 2013, January through March.
Based on the above information, the Coast Guard believes it is
reasonable to allow the Veterans Memorial Bridge to be crewed between 7
a.m. and 3 p.m. and be on a two hour advance notice at all other times.
This decision was based on the few number requests to open the bridge
the past two years and the high vertical clearance under the draw.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866, or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. We believe that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because the bridge will still open
for all vessel traffic at all times provided the advance notice is
given 3 p.m. to 7 a.m. by calling the number posted at the bridge.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
needing to transit through the bridge.
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The
bridge will continue to open on signal from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. and from 3
p.m. to 7 a.m. after a two hour advance notice is given. Additionally,
the bridge has a vertical clearance of 60 feet at mean high water and
66 feet at mean low water which allows many vessels to pass through the
bridge without a need for an opening.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without
[[Page 31459]]
jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply promulgates
the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of significant environmental
impact from the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 33 CFR 117.619, add paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.619 Taunton River.
* * * * *
(f) The draw of the Veterans Memorial Bridge, mile 2.1, across the
Taunton River between Fall River and Somerset, shall operate as
follows:
(1) From 7 a.m. through 3 p.m. the draw shall open on signal.
(2) From 3 p.m. through 7 a.m. the draw shall open on signal
provided a two hour advance notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge.
Dated: May 10, 2013.
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2013-12397 Filed 5-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P