Export Administration Regulations (EAR): Control of Spacecraft Systems and Related Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control Under the United States Munitions List (USML), 31431-31443 [2013-11986]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the Central Service Center, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking
202–267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
This action proposes to amend Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), part 71 by establishing Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 8-mile
radius of Wagner Municipal Airport,
Wagner, SD, to accommodate new
standard instrument approach
procedures at the airport. Controlled
airspace is needed for the safety and
management of IFR operations at the
airport.
Class E airspace areas are published
in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012 and
effective September 15, 2012, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
establish controlled airspace at Wagner
Municipal Airport, Wagner, SD.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
AGL SD E5
*
*
Wagner, SD [New]
Wagner Municipal Airport, SD
(Lat. 43°03′51″ N., long. 98°17′47″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius
of Wagner Municipal Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, TX on April 11,
2013.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–12479 Filed 5–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 734, 736, 740, 742, 748,
758, 772, and 774
[Docket No. 130110030–3030–01]
RIN 0694–AF87
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR): Control of Spacecraft Systems
and Related Items the President
Determines No Longer Warrant Control
Under the United States Munitions List
(USML)
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Proposed Amendment
§ 71.1
31431
This proposed rule describes
how certain articles the President
determines no longer warrant control
under United States Munitions List
(USML) Category XV—spacecraft and
related items—would be controlled on
the Commerce Control List (CCL). Such
items would be controlled by new
Export Control Classification Numbers
(ECCNs) 9A515, 9B515, 9D515, and
9E515 proposed by this rule and
existing ECCNs. This is one in a
planned series of proposed rules
describing how various types of articles
the President determines, as part of the
Administration’s Export Control Reform
Initiative, no longer warrant USML
control, would be controlled on the CCL
and by the EAR. This proposed rule is
being published in conjunction with a
proposed rule from the Department of
State, Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls, which would amend the list of
articles controlled by USML Category
XV. The revisions proposed in this rule
are part of Commerce’s retrospective
regulatory review plan under EO 13563
completed in August 2011.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The identification
number for this rulemaking is BIS–
2013–0012.
• By email directly to
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include
RIN 0694–AF87 in the subject line.
• By mail or delivery to Regulatory
Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Room 2099B, 14th Street and
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230. Refer to RIN 0694–AF87.
Commerce’s full plan can be accessed
at: https://open.commerce.gov/news/
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31432
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
2011/08/23/commerce-planretrospective-analysis-existing-rules.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about the ECCNs included in
this rule contact Dennis Krepp, Office of
National Security and Technology
Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry
and Security, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Telephone: 202–482–1309,
Email: Dennis.Krepp@bis.doc.gov. For
general questions about the ‘‘500 series’’
regulatory changes, contact Robert
Monjay, Regulatory Policy Division,
Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of
Industry and Security, at 202–482–2440
or Robert.Monjay@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
On January 2, 2013, President Obama
signed the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(‘‘2013 NDAA’’) (Pub. L. 112–239).
Section 1261 of the 2013 NDAA
amended Section 1513 of the Strom
Thurmond National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999
(‘‘1999 NDAA’’) by striking the
requirement that all satellites and
related items be subject to the export
control jurisdiction of the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22
CFR parts 120 through 130). The
President is now authorized and
obligated, pursuant to section 38(f) of
the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22
U.S.C. 2778(f)), to review the USML ‘‘to
determine what items, if any, no longer
warrant export controls under’’ the
AECA.
This notice requests public comment
on the changes described in this
proposed rule and the corresponding
State Department’s proposed revisions
to the ITAR. These rulemakings are the
Administration’s first step in
implementing the authorities returned
to the President by the 2013 NDAA to
determine the proper and more tailored
controls over the export of satellites and
related items as recommended by the
Departments of Defense (DOD) and
State. These two proposed rules are part
of the Administration’s larger Export
Control Reform effort described, inter
alia, in the Commerce Department’s July
15, 2011 proposed rule (76 FR 41958)
(‘‘July 15 (framework) rule’’) setting up
a structure to control in the EAR items
that the President determines no longer
warrant control under the ITAR in
accordance with section 38(f) of the
AECA. On November 7, 2011, BIS
published a proposed rule (76 FR
68675) (‘‘November 7 (aircraft) rule’’)
that proposed several changes to the
framework in the July 15 proposed rule.
On June 19, 2012, BIS published a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
proposed rule to define the term
‘‘specially designed’’ (77 FR 36409)
(‘‘the June 19 (specially designed)
rule’’). On June 21, 2012, BIS published
a rule entitled Proposed Revisions to the
Export Administration Regulations:
Implementation of Export Control
Reform; Revisions to License Exceptions
After Retrospective Regulatory Review,
(77 FR 37524) (‘‘the June 21 (transition)
rule’’). Readers may find it useful to
review these four proposed rules when
preparing their comments on this
proposed rule. Generally following the
structure of the July 15 (framework) and
the November 7 (aircraft) rules, this
proposed rule describes BIS’s proposal
for controlling under the EAR’s CCL the
‘‘spacecraft’’ and related articles now
controlled under Category XV of the
ITAR’s United States Munitions List (22
CFR part 121) (USML) that would not be
controlled under the revised USML
Category XV.
In March 2012, the Departments of
Defense and State filed with Congress
their ‘‘Final Report’’ required by section
1248 of the National Defense
Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2010.
See https://www.defense.gov/home/
features/2011/0111_nsss/docs/
1248_Report_Space_Export_Control.pdf
(the ‘‘1248 Report’’). The 1248 Report
identified the types of satellites and
related items that should not be
designated as ‘‘defense articles’’
controlled under the ITAR. ‘‘For the
sake of national and economic security,
the Departments recommend[ed] that
authority to determine the appropriate
export control status of satellites and
space-related items be returned to the
President.’’ Id. The changes described in
this proposed rule and in the State
Department’s companion proposed rule
on Category XV of the USML are based
on a review of Category XV by the
Defense Department, which, as
described in the 1248 Report, worked
with the Departments of State and
Commerce in preparing the proposed
amendments.
The Defense Department reviewed the
articles in Category XV to determine
which are either (i) inherently military
and otherwise warrant control on the
USML or (ii) if, common to non-military
space applications, possess parameters
or characteristics that provide a critical
military or intelligence advantage to the
United States, and that are almost
exclusively available from the United
States. If an article satisfied one or both
of those criteria, the article remained on
the USML. All other satellites and
related items are, pursuant to the State
and Commerce Department notices,
proposed to move to the export control
jurisdiction of the EAR. The licensing
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements and other EAR-specific
controls for such items described in this
notice would enhance national security
by permitting the U.S. Government to
focus its resources on controlling,
monitoring, investigating, analyzing,
and, if need be, prohibiting exports and
reexports of more significant items to
destinations, end uses, and end users of
greater concern than NATO allies and
other multi-regime partners.
In the July 15 (framework) rule, BIS
proposed creating a ‘‘600 series’’ for the
new ECCNs to control the munitions
items that would be removed from the
USML and items currently on the CCL
that are also on the Wassenaar
Arrangement Munitions List (WAML).
This rule proposes to create a new ‘‘500
series’’ of ECCNs to control ‘‘spacecraft’’
systems and associated equipment that
would be removed from the USML. This
new series would be created for
‘‘spacecraft’’ systems and associated
equipment because, although these
items are currently on the USML, many
of them are commercial items with no
military or intelligence applications,
such as commercial communications
satellites. It would be inappropriate to
include these types of items in the ‘‘600
series,’’ which is, by definition,
comprised of munitions items.
Additionally, because many items
proposed to be moved in this rule do
have military or intelligence
applications, it would be unnecessarily
complicated and confusing to move
certain ‘‘spacecraft’’ systems and
associated equipment to new ‘‘600
series’’ ECCNs while moving the
commercial items to existing ECCNs.
The creation of a new series would
provide a place for ‘‘spacecraft’’ systems
and associated equipment transferred
from the USML, and would allow BIS to
apply the appropriate controls to these
items. The new series would be
identified as the ‘‘500 series’’ because
the third character in each of the new
ECCNs would be a ‘‘5.’’ The first two
characters of the 500 series ECCNs serve
the same function as any other ECCN as
described in § 738.2 of the EAR. The
first character is a digit in the range 0
through 9 that identifies the Category on
the CCL in which the ECCN is located.
In addition, it would be inappropriate to
put these new controls in one of the
multilateral controls of the CCL, such as
the ‘‘000 series’’ for items controlled
under the Wassenaar Arrangement,
because none of the items described in
proposed ECCN 9x515 in this notice are
exclusively subject to multilateral
United States controls.
Although the items in the proposed
new 9x515 ECCNs would not be listed
in the 600 series, the order of review for
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
New 9X515 Series of ECCNs
Detailed Description of Changes
Proposed by This Rule
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the new ECCNs is similar to that for 600
series ECCNs. That is, when
determining whether an item that is
now controlled under USML Category
XV would be controlled on the EAR if
it is not within the scope of the revised
USML Category XV, one must first look
to the 9x515 ECCNs. Only if it is not
controlled in one of the new ECCNs
would one then look to the remaining
ECCNs in the CCL to determine whether
the item is on the CCL or, if not, an
EAR99 item. The order of review
guidance in Supplement No. 4 to Part
774 is proposed to be amended
accordingly.
The ECCNs created in this rule would
begin with ‘‘9,’’ because that is the
corresponding CCL category for controls
on ‘‘spacecraft.’’ The second character is
a letter in the range A through E that
identifies the product group within a
CCL Category. In the ‘‘500 series,’’ the
third character is the number 5. The
final two characters of the ECCNs would
be fifteen to identify the corresponding
USML category that had covered the
items in the new ECCN. The ECCNs that
would be created or revised by this
proposed rule are described more fully
below.
BIS will publish additional Federal
Register notices containing proposed
amendments to the CCL that will
describe proposed controls for
additional categories of articles the
President determines no longer warrant
control under the USML. The State
Department will publish concurrently
proposed amendments to the USML that
correspond to the BIS notices. BIS will
also publish proposed rules to further
align the CCL with the WAML and the
Missile Technology Control Regime
Equipment, Software and Technology
Annex.
The revisions proposed in this rule
are part of Commerce’s retrospective
regulatory review plan under EO 13563
completed in August 2011. Commerce’s
full plan can be accessed at: https://
open.commerce.gov/news/2011/08/23/
commerce-plan-retrospective-analysisexisting-rules.
New ECCN 9X515
This rule proposes changes to the text
of the EAR as modified by the Initial
Implementation Rule of April 16, 2013
(78 FR 22660). BIS made changes to the
EAR in the Initial Implementation Rule
that provide the framework for the ‘‘500
series.’’ The changes made to the EAR
in the Initial Implementation Rule will
be effective on October 15, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
This proposed rule would create four
new ‘‘500 series’’ ECCNs in CCL
Category 9 (ECCNs 9A515, 9B515,
9D515, and 9E515) to describe the EAR
controls over the items the President
determines no longer warrant control
under the USML Category XV and that
are not otherwise within the scope of an
existing ECCN. Terms such as ‘‘part’’
and ‘‘component’’ and ‘‘accessories’’
and ‘‘attachments’’ are applied in the
same manner in this rule as those terms
are defined in the Initial
Implementation Rule of April 16, 2013
(78 FR 22660). This rule would also add
a new definition for the ‘‘500 series’’ to
§ 772.1. The new ‘‘500 series’’ would
not include the International Space
Station, which remains under ECCN
9A004.
This rule also proposes to amend the
related controls paragraph of eighteen
ECCNs—i.e., 3A001, 3A002, 3A611,
3D001, 3E001, 3E003, 5A001, 5A991,
5E001, 6A002, 6A004, 6D001, 6D002,
6E001, 6E002, 7A004, 7A104 and
9A004. The cross references to the
USML for items listed in the proposed
USML Category XV would be revised.
The cross references to the USML for
items that are proposed to transition
from Category XV of the USML would
be removed. This rule additionally
proposes to remove paragraph .b from
the List of Items Controlled in ECCN
9A004. Paragraph .b was added to the
CCL on March 15, 1999, when all
satellites, including commercial
communications satellites, and related
items were transferred to the USML
pursuant to the 1999 NDAA.
Paragraph .b provided a space on the
CCL to control specific ‘‘spacecraft’’
related items that were determined to be
not subject to the ITAR through the
commodity jurisdiction procedure
administered by the Department of
State. The new ‘‘500 series’’ ECCNs,
specifically 9A515, would control all
‘‘spacecraft’’ and related items that are
not otherwise enumerated on the USML
or CCL. Therefore, it is appropriate to
delete 9A004.b and bring these
‘‘spacecraft’’ related items into the orbit
of 9A515.
Proposed ECCN 9A515 paragraph .a
would control ‘‘spacecraft,’’ including
satellites, manned or unmanned space
vehicles, whether designated
developmental, experimental, research
or scientific, not enumerated in USML
Category XV. Paragraph 9A515.b would
control ground control systems and
training simulators ‘‘specially designed’’
for telemetry, tracking, and control of
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31433
the ‘‘spacecraft’’ in paragraph 9A515.a.
Paragraph .c would be reserved.
Paragraph .d would control certain
radiation hardened microelectronic
circuits that are ‘‘specially designed’’ for
defense articles on the USML, ‘‘600
series’’ items, or items controlled by
9A515 that meet or exceed five specific
characteristics. A reminder note is
proposed for ECCN 9A515.d to state that
application specific integrated circuits
(ASICs) ‘‘specially designed’’ for
defense articles are controlled by
Category XI(c) of the USML, regardless
of characteristics. A second note is
proposed for ECCN 9A515.d that ‘‘space
qualified’’ microelectronic circuits that
do not meet the radiation-hardening or
other criterion of 9A515.d are controlled
by ECCN 9A515.x. A third note is
proposed for ECCN 9A515.d to refer to
controls in 3A001.a for microelectronic
circuits that are ‘‘subject to the EAR’’
and not controlled by 9A515. A fourth
note is proposed for ECCN 9A515.d to
state that microelectronic circuits
‘‘specially designed’’ for defense articles
on the USML (other than Category XV)
or ‘‘600 series’’ items that do not meet
the radiation hardening criteria of
paragraph .d would be controlled by the
proposed ‘‘600 series’’ ECCN 3A611.
Paragraphs .e through .w would be
reserved.
Paragraph .x would control ‘‘parts,’’
‘‘components,’’ ‘‘accessories,’’ and
‘‘attachments’’ that are ‘‘space
qualified’’ and not controlled on the
USML, elsewhere within ECCN 9A515,
or in one of the existing ECCNs that has
‘‘space qualified’’ as a control criterion.
A note is proposed for ECCN 9A515.x to
remind readers that ‘‘parts,’’
‘‘components,’’ and ‘‘accessories’’ and
‘‘attachments’’ specified in USML
subcategory XV(e) or enumerated in
other USML categories are subject to the
controls of the USML.
New ECCN 9B515
Proposed ECCN 9B515 paragraph .a
would control test, inspection, and
production ‘‘equipment’’ ‘‘specially
designed’’ for the ‘‘production’’ or
‘‘development’’ of commodities
enumerated in ECCN 9A515 or USML
Category XV.
Paragraph .b would control
‘‘equipment,’’ cells, and stands
‘‘specially designed’’ for testing,
analysis and fault isolation of
commodities enumerated in ECCN
9A515, 9A004 or USML Category XV.
Paragraph .c would control
environmental test chambers capable of
pressures below (10¥4) Torr, and
‘‘specially designed’’ ‘‘components’’
therefor.
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31434
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
New ECCN 9D515
Proposed ECCN 9D515 would control
‘‘software’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for the
‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production,’’
operation, installation, maintenance,
repair, overhaul, or refurbishing of
commodities controlled by ECCNs
9A515 and 9B515.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
New ECCN 9E515
Proposed ECCN 9E515 paragraph .a
would control ‘‘technology’’ ‘‘required’’
for the ‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production,’’
operation, installation, maintenance,
repair, overhaul or refurbishing of items
controlled by ECCN 9A515, 9B515, or
9D515.
The appendix to the 1248 Report
referred to a possible need to control
technology required for passenger
participation in space travel (e.g., suborbital, orbital, lunar, interplanetary or
habitat) for space tourism, research or
scientific endeavors, or transportation
from one point to another for
commercial purposes. The Departments
of Defense and State have since
reviewed such technology and
concluded that it is not per se now
subject to USML Category XV. There is
thus no proposed inclusion of such
technology as a general matter in either
the proposed USML Category XV or the
proposed 9E515. To the extent other
technology described in either the
proposed USML XV or 9E515 would be
released to a foreign person during such
activities, then it would be controlled
according to the requirements of the
relevant paragraph.
Applicable controls for new ‘‘500
series’’ ECCNs.
All items in the 9X515 ECCNs, as
proposed in this rule, would be subject
to national security (NS Column 1) and
regional stability (RS Column 1)
controls, as well as antiterrorism (AT
Column 1) controls. Some of the items
would be subject to missile technology
(MT) controls in some cases. The
licensing policy would be a case-by-case
review to determine whether the
transaction is contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. However, applications for
‘‘500 series’’ items destined to a country
listed in Country Group D:5
(Supplement No. 1 to Part 740) as a
country subject to a U.S. arms embargo
will be reviewed consistent with United
States arms embargo policies. Country
Group D:5 (Supplement No. 1 to Part
740) is set out in the Initial
Implementation Rule of April 16, 2013
(78 FR 22660). The U.S. Government
has long considered U.S. arms embargo
policies when reviewing license
applications to export items subject to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
the EAR. BIS has now explicitly stated
that the review policy for all ‘‘600
series’’ items will be consistent with
U.S. arms embargos. DOD and the State
Department recommended in the 1248
Report to Congress that BIS explicitly
adopt this review policy for items
transitioning from the USML to ensure
that exporters are aware that all items
subject to embargo remain so on the
CCL. BIS agrees with this
recommendation and would amend
§§ 742.4(b)(1)(ii) and 742.6(b)(1) to add
the term ‘‘500 series.’’ Additionally, as
required by Section 1261 of the 2013
NDAA, applications for ‘‘500 series’’
items destined to the People’s Republic
of China, North Korea, or any country
that is a state sponsor of terrorism,
would be subject to a policy of denial.
‘‘Space-Qualified’’
In December 2012, the Wassenaar
Arrangement on Export Controls for
Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods
and Technologies (‘‘Wassenaar
Arrangement’’) amended its definition
of ‘‘space-qualified’’ to be ‘‘[d]esigned,
manufactured, or qualified through
successful testing, for operation at
altitudes greater than 100 km above the
surface of the Earth. Note: A
determination that a specific item is
‘‘space qualified’’ by virtue of testing
does not mean that other items in the
same production run or model series are
‘‘space qualified’’ if not individually
tested.’’ BIS plans to adopt this
definition in the EAR when it publishes
its amendments to the EAR to
implement the amendments agreed to
by the Wassenaar Arrangement. To
comment on the proposed changes to
the EAR in this notice that pertain to the
meaning of ‘‘space-qualified,’’ the
public should use the above definition.
The Wassenaar Arrangement adopted
the revised definition after the
Departments of State and Defense
submitted to Congress the 1248 Report,
describing the proposed controls on
‘‘space qualified’’ items not controlled
elsewhere. In addition, the revised
definition was adopted after the U.S.
Government had received and
considered public comments on its
proposed definition of ‘‘specially
designed,’’ which would be the control
parameter in its other ‘‘.x’’ catch-all
controls. In order to (i) maintain the
‘‘space qualified’’ control scope
described in the 1248 Report, (ii)
maintain consistency between this
catch-all control and the other ‘‘space
qualified’’ controls in the CCL, and (iii)
limit the ambiguity between the scope
of this catch-all approach and the other
new ‘‘.x’’ catch-alls that use ‘‘specially
designed,’’ BIS is proposing the addition
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of a note to the new ‘‘space qualified’’
definition. The note would state that, for
purposes of these controls, the terms
‘designed’ and ‘manufactured’ in the
Wassenaar’s definition of ‘‘space
qualified’’ are synonymous with the
EAR’s new definition of ‘‘specially
designed.’’ Thus, for example, an item
that is ‘‘specially designed’’ for a
spacecraft is deemed to be ‘designed’ or
‘manufactured’ for operation at altitudes
greater than 100 km and an item that is
not ‘‘specially designed’’ for a spacecraft
is not deemed to have been so
‘designed’ or ‘manufactured.’ An
implication of this note would be that
an item that becomes ‘‘space qualified’’
by virtue of successful testing would be
‘‘space qualified’’ regardless of whether
it would be considered ‘‘specially
designed.’’ This note does not constitute
a modification of the Wassenaar
definition of the term, only a comment
about how it is relates to the EAR’s
definition of ‘‘specially designed.’’
Effects of This Proposed Rule
De minimis
Items made outside the United States
that incorporate items subject to the
EAR are subject to the EAR if they
exceed a de minimis percentage of
controlled U.S.-origin content, as
described in § 734.3 of the EAR. The
Initial Implementation Rule of April 16,
2013 (78 FR 22660) established the de
minimis threshold for a foreign-made
item that incorporates U.S.-origin ‘‘600
series’’ items at zero percent when the
foreign-made item is destined for a
country subject to a U.S. arms embargo
and 25 percent for destinations that are
not subject to a U.S. arms embargo. This
rule proposes to adopt the same de
minimis thresholds for the ‘‘500 series’’
as is proposed for the ‘‘600 series.’’
Foreign-made items that incorporate any
amount of U.S.-origin ‘‘500 series’’ items
would be subject to the EAR when
destined to a country that is subject to
a U.S. arms embargo (i.e., Afghanistan,
Belarus, Burma, China, Cote d’Ivoire,
Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic Republic of
Congo, Eritrea, Fiji, Haiti, Iraq, Iran,
Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, North Korea,
Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria,
Venezuela, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe). A
foreign-made item that incorporates
U.S.-origin ‘‘500 series’’ items, destined
to a country that is not subject to a U.S.
arms embargo, would be eligible for de
minimis treatment and would not be
subject to the EAR if the value of all of
its U.S.-origin controlled content does
not exceed 25 percent of foreign-made
item’s value.
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Foreign-Produced Direct Product
The Initial Implementation Rule of
April 16, 2013 (78 FR 22660) expanded
the foreign-produced direct products of
U.S. ‘‘technology’’ that are subject to the
EAR. Foreign-produced direct products
of U.S.-origin ‘‘600 series’’
‘‘technology,’’ or of a plant or major
component of a plant that is a direct
product of U.S.-origin ‘‘600 series’’
‘‘technology,’’ that are ‘‘600 series’’
items are proposed to be subject to the
EAR when reexported or exported from
abroad to countries listed in Country
Groups D:1 (national security countries
of concern), D:3 (chemical and
biological countries of concern), D:4
(missile technology countries of
concern), or E:1 (countries that support
terrorism) in Supplement No. 1 to part
740 or countries subject to a U.S. arms
embargo. Foreign-made items subject to
the EAR because of this rule are subject
to the same license requirements to the
new country of destination as if they
were of U.S. origin. This rule proposes
to extend the ‘‘600 series’’ direct
product rule to items in the ‘‘500 series’’
as well.
Use of License Exceptions
Most ‘‘500 series’’ items would be
eligible for several license exceptions,
including STA, which would be
available for exports to certain countries
that are NATO members or multi-regime
close allies. Certain items described in
ECCNs 9D515 and 9E515, however,
would not be eligible for export under
STA, as described in those ECCNs.
Additionally, the MT controlled
commodities in 9A515 and some types
of technology in 9E515 would not be
eligible for any license exceptions,
including STA. The use of STA for ‘‘500
series’’ items would require the
consignee to consent to an end-user
check by the U.S. Government in
addition to the standard consignee
statement required for all STA
transactions. ‘‘600 series’’ items are
subject to additional criteria for the use
of License Exception STA. Specifically,
the Ultimate Consignee must be in an
A:5 country and either (a) the ultimate
end user must be the government of an
A:5 country or the United States
Government, or (b) the items must be for
the ‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ of
an item in that will ultimately be used
by any such government agencies, the
United States Government, or a person
in the United States. BIS is not
proposing to make this ‘‘600 series’’
specific STA requirement applicable to
the ‘‘500 series.’’ ‘‘500 series’’ items are
not munitions items and are generally
not intended for ultimate end use by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
governmental end users. The majority of
the items in the ‘‘500 series’’ are
commercial items, and while many of
the ‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components’’ have
military or intelligence applications,
they are dual-use items that have
commercial applications. Therefore, the
application of this requirement to the
‘‘500 series’’ would be inappropriate.
Items controlled under proposed
ECCNs 9A515 and 9B515 would also be
eligible for License Exception LVS
(limited value shipments) up to a value
of $1,500 ($5,000 for 9B515.c), TMP
(temporary exports), GOV (U.S.
Government), and RPL (servicing and
replacement parts). The use of license
exceptions for ‘‘500 series’’ items
generally would be prohibited to any
destination subject to a U.S. arms
embargo, except to the U.S. Government
under License Exception GOV.
License Applications
In a license application for a
transaction involving ‘‘500 series’’ items
that is equivalent to a transaction that
was previously approved by the State
Department under the ITAR, the
applicant may report the ITAR license
or other approval number to BIS in
Block 24 of the license application.
Only those license applications where
the particulars (e.g., the function,
performance capabilities, form and fit of
the item, the purchaser, ultimate
consignee and end user(s)) are the same
in both the EAR license application and
the previously issued ITAR
authorization would receive full
consideration under this paragraph. For
example, if a U.S. company had an
ITAR authorization to export certain
radiation hardened microchips that will
be controlled under 9A515.d to a
governmental end user in Japan, the
company may list that authorization in
Block 24 if it plans to export more of the
same chips to the same end user in
Japan. However, if the company wishes
to export the same chip to a commercial
end user or the next generation of chip
to the same government end user, it may
not list the prior authorization as
precedent. Block 24 would alert BIS and
the other U.S. Government agencies
reviewing a particular ‘‘500 series’’
license application that this new
application to BIS concerns a
transaction that is equivalent to a
previously approved transaction. This
information may be relevant to review
of the transaction and may result in an
expedited determination.
Export Clearance
This rule proposes to adopt the ‘‘600
series’’ export clearance requirements
proposed in the June 21 (transition)
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31435
rule. This rule would revise § 758.1 to
require that information on all exports
of ‘‘500 series’’ items be filed in AES
regardless of value or destination. BIS is
required to report to Congress on all
‘‘500 series’’ exports and would only be
able to obtain information on low value
unlicensed shipments if an AES filing is
made. This rule would also revise
§ 758.2 to preclude the option of postdeparture filing for exports of ‘‘500
series’’ items. This revision would
maintain the current status of these
items under the ITAR as ineligible for
post-departure filing. Finally, this rule
would revise § 758.6 to require that the
ECCN for each ‘‘500 series’’ item being
shipped be provided on the same
documents on which the Destination
Control Statement is required. This
would require that the ECCN for each
‘‘500 series’’ item be entered on the
invoice and on the bill of lading, air
waybill, or another export control
document that accompanies the
shipment from its point of origin in the
United States to the ultimate consignee
or end user abroad.
Order of Review
Supplement No. 4 to Part 774 would
be amended to include a reference to the
new 9x515 ECCNs so that those
engaging in classification analyses of
items formerly in USML Category XV
but no longer controlled under the
amended USML Category XV know to
review the new 9X515 ECCNs before
reviewing other potentially applicable
ECCNs in the CCL.
Request for Comments
BIS seeks comments on this proposed
rule. BIS will consider all comments
received on or before July 8, 2013. All
comments (including any personally
identifying information or information
for which a claim of confidentially is
asserted either in those comments or
their transmittal emails) will be made
available for public inspection and
copying. Parties who wish to comment
anonymously may do so by submitting
their comments via Regulations.gov,
leaving the fields that would identify
the commenter blank and including no
identifying information in the comment
itself.
Although the Export Administration
Act expired on August 20, 2001, the
President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013),
and as extended by the Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16,
2012), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31436
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to
carry out the provisions of the Export
Administration Act, as appropriate and
to the extent permitted by law, pursuant
to Executive Order 13222.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ although not economically
significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule has been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number. This proposed
rule would affect two approved
collections: Simplified Network
Application Processing System (control
number 0694–0088), which includes,
among other things, license
applications, and License Exceptions
and Exclusions (0694–0137).
BIS believes that the effect of adding
items to the EAR that would be removed
from the ITAR as a result of this rule as
part of the administration’s Export
Control Reform Initiative would
increase the number of license
applications to be submitted to BIS by
approximately 1,500 annually, resulting
in an increase in burden hours of 425
(1,500 transactions at 17 minutes each)
under control number 0694–0088.
Most ‘‘spacecraft’’ and ground control
systems, ‘‘space qualified’’ ‘‘parts,’’
‘‘components,’’ ‘‘accessories’’ and
‘‘attachments,’’ and related ‘‘software’’
and ‘‘technology’’ formerly on the
USML would become eligible for
License Exception STA under this rule.
BIS believes that the increased use of
License Exception STA resulting from
the effect of adding items to the EAR
that would be removed from the ITAR
as a result of this rule as part of the
administration’s Export Control Reform
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
Initiative would increase the burden
associated with control number 0694–
0137 by about 2,258 hours (1,935
transactions @ 1 hour and 10 minutes
each).
BIS expects that this increase in
burden would be more than offset by a
reduction in burden hours associated
with approved collections related to the
ITAR. The largest impact of the
proposed rule would likely apply to
exporters of parts, components,
accessories, and attachments
specifically designed or modified for
satellite and other ‘‘spacecraft’’ items
that would have been approved for
export under the ITAR pursuant to a
license for export to NATO allies and
regime partners. Because, with few
exceptions, the ITAR allows exemptions
from license requirements only for
certain exports to Canada, most exports
of such parts, even when destined to
NATO and other allied countries,
require specific State Department
authorization. Under the EAR, as
proposed in this notice, such ‘‘parts’’
and ‘‘components’’ would become
eligible for export to NATO and other
multi-regime allies under License
Exception STA. Use of License
Exception STA imposes a paperwork
and compliance burden because, for
example, exporters must furnish
information about the item being
exported to the consignee and obtain
from the consignee an
acknowledgement and commitment to
comply with the EAR. However, the
Administration understands that
complying with the burdens of STA is
likely less burdensome than applying
for licenses or other approval from the
State Department. For example, under
License Exception STA, a single
consignee statement can apply to an
unlimited number of products, need not
have an expiration date, and need not be
submitted to the government in advance
for approval. Suppliers with regular
customers can tailor a single statement
and assurance to match their business
relationship, rather than applying
repeatedly for licenses with every
purchase order to supply reliable
customers in countries that are close
allies or members of export control
regimes or both.
Even in situations in which a license
would be required under the EAR, the
burden is likely to be reduced compared
to the license requirement of the ITAR.
In particular, license applications for
exports of ‘‘technology’’ controlled by
ECCN 9E515 are likely to be less
complex and burdensome than the
authorizations required to export ITARcontrolled ‘‘technology,’’ i.e.,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Manufacturing License Agreements and
Technical Assistance Agreements.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C.
601 et seq., generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to the notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553) or any other statute,
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Under section 605(b) of the
RFA, however, if the head of an agency
certifies that a rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities, the statute
does not require the agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Pursuant to section 605(b), the Chief
Counsel for Regulation, Department of
Commerce, submitted a memorandum
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy,
Small Business Administration,
certifying that this proposed rule will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. A
summary of the factual basis for this
certification follows.
Number of Small Entities
BIS does not collect data on the size
of entities that apply for and are issued
export licenses. Although BIS is unable
to estimate the exact number of small
entities that would be affected by this
rule, it acknowledges that this rule
would affect some unknown number.
Economic Impact
This proposed rule is part of the
Administration’s Export Control Reform
Initiative. Under that initiative, the
USML (22 CFR part 121) would be
revised to be a ‘‘positive’’ list, i.e., a list
that does not use generic, catch-all
controls on any part, component,
accessory, attachment, or end item that
was in any way specifically modified for
a defense article, regardless of the
article’s military or intelligence
significance or non-military
applications. At the same time, articles
that are determined to no longer warrant
control on the USML would become
controlled on the CCL. ‘‘Spacecraft’’ and
related items so designated will be
identified in specific ECCNs known as
the ‘‘500 series’’ ECCNs. In practice, the
greatest impact of this rule on small
entities would likely be reduced
administrative costs and reduced delay
for exports of items that are now on the
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
USML but would become subject to the
EAR.
Many ‘‘spacecraft’’ and specific parts
and components would remain on the
USML. However, ‘‘parts,’’
‘‘components,’’ ‘‘accessories,’’ and
‘‘attachments’’ for such ‘‘equipment’’
would be included on the CCL unless
expressly enumerated on the USML.
Such ‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components’’ are
more likely to be produced by small
businesses than complete ‘‘spacecraft,’’
which would in many cases become
subject to the EAR. Moreover, officials
at the Department of State have
informed BIS that license applications
for such ‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components’’ are
a high percentage of the license
applications for USML articles reviewed
by that department. The proposed
changes in this rule will not result in
the decontrol of such items, but will
reduce administrative and collateral
regulatory burdens by, for example,
allowing for the use of License
Exception STA for exports to NATO and
other multi-regime allied countries.
Thus, changing the jurisdictional
status of certain Category XV articles
would reduce the burden on small
entities (and other entities as well)
through: Elimination of some license
requirements, greater availability of
license exceptions, simplification of
license application procedures, and
reduction (or elimination) of registration
fees. In addition, parts and components
controlled under the ITAR remain under
ITAR control when incorporated into
foreign-made items, regardless of the
significance or insignificance of the
item, discouraging foreign buyers from
incorporating such U.S. content.
Exporters and reexporters of the
Category XV articles, particularly
‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components,’’ that would
be placed on the CCL by this rule would
need fewer licenses because their
transactions would become eligible for
license exceptions that apply to
shipments to United States Government
agencies, shipments valued at less than
$1,500, ‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components’’
being exported for use as replacement
parts, temporary exports, and License
Exception Strategic Trade Authorization
(STA). License Exceptions under the
EAR would allow suppliers to send
routine parts and low level parts to
NATO and other export control regime
partner countries without having to
obtain export licenses. Under License
Exception STA, the exporter would
need to furnish information about the
item being exported to the consignee
and obtain a statement from the
consignee that, among other things,
would commit the consignee to comply
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
with the EAR and other applicable U.S.
laws.
Because such statements and
obligations can apply to an unlimited
number of transactions and have no
expiration date, they would impose a
net reduction in burden on transactions
that the government routinely approves
through the license application process
that the License Exception STA
statements would replace.
Even for exports and reexports in
which a license would be required, the
process would be simpler and less
costly under the EAR than under the
USML. When a USML Category XV
article moves to the CCL, the number of
destinations for which a license is
required would remain unchanged.
However, the burden on the license
applicant would decrease because the
licensing procedure for CCL items is
simpler and more flexible than the
license procedure for USML articles.
Under the USML licensing procedure,
an applicant must include a purchase
order or contract with its application.
There is no such requirement under the
CCL licensing procedure. This
difference gives the CCL applicant at
least two advantages. First, the
applicant has a way of determining
whether the U.S. Government will
authorize the transaction before it enters
into potentially lengthy, complex, and
expensive sales presentations or
contract negotiations. Under the USML
procedure, the applicant will need to
caveat all sales presentations with a
reference to the need for government
approval, and is more likely to have to
engage in substantial effort and expense
only to find that the government will
reject the application. Second, a CCL
license applicant need not limit its
application to the quantity or value of
one purchase order or contract. It may
apply for a license to cover all of its
expected exports or reexports to a
particular consignee over the life of a
license (normally four years, but may be
longer if circumstances warrant a longer
period), reducing the total number of
licenses for which the applicant must
apply.
In addition, many applicants, who are
exporting or reexporting items that this
rule would transfer from the USML to
the CCL, would realize cost savings
through the elimination of some or all
registration fees currently assessed
under the USML’s licensing procedure.
Currently, USML applicants must pay to
use the USML licensing procedure even
if they never actually are authorized to
export. Registration fees for
manufacturers and exporters of articles
on the USML start at $2,250 per year,
increase to $2,750 for organizations
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31437
applying for one to ten licenses per year
and further increases to $2,750 plus
$250 per license application (subject to
a maximum of three percent of total
application value) for those who need to
apply for more than ten licenses per
year.
There are no registration costs or
application processing fees for
applications to export items listed on
the CCL. Once the Category XV articles
that are the subject to this rulemaking
are added to the CCL and removed from
the USML, entities currently applying
for licenses from the Department of
State would find their registration fees
reduced if the number of USML licenses
those entities need declines. If an
entity’s entire product line is moved to
the CCL, then its ITAR registration and
registration fee requirement would be
eliminated and it would no longer incur
that expense.
De minimis treatment under the EAR
would also become available for all
items that this rule would transfer from
the USML to the CCL. Items subject to
the ITAR remain subject to the ITAR
when they are incorporated abroad into
a foreign-made product, regardless of
the percentage of U.S. content in that
foreign-made product. Foreign-made
products that incorporate items that this
rule would move to the CCL would be
subject to the EAR only if their total
controlled U.S.-origin content exceeds
25 percent for most destinations.
Because including small amounts of
U.S.-origin content would not subject
foreign-made products to the EAR,
foreign manufacturers would have less
incentive to avoid such U.S.-origin
‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components,’’ a
development that potentially would
mean greater sales for U.S. suppliers,
including small entities.
Conclusion
BIS is unable to determine the precise
number of small entities that would be
affected by this rule. Based on the facts
and conclusions set forth above, BIS
believes that any burdens imposed by
this rule would be offset by the
reduction in the number of items that
would require a license, increased
opportunities for use of license
exceptions for exports to certain
countries, simpler export license
applications, reduced or eliminated
registration fees and application of a de
minimis threshold for foreign-made
items incorporating U.S.-origin ‘‘parts’’
and ‘‘components,’’ which would
reduce the incentive for foreign buyers
to design out or avoid U.S.-origin
content. For these reasons, the Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31438
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
rule, if adopted in final form, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
■
List of Subjects
*
15 CFR Parts 734, 740, 748 and 758
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Parts 736 and 772
Exports.
15 CFR Parts 742 and 774
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
Parts 730–774), as amended by the final
rule published April 16, 2013 (78 FR
22660), effective October 15, 2013, are
proposed to be further amended as
follows:
PART 734—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 734 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099,
3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 13020, 61
FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77
FR 49699 (August 16, 2012); Notice of
November 1, 2012, 77 FR 66513 (November
5, 2012).
2. Section 734.4 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(6) to read as
follows:
■
§ 734.4
De minimis U.S. content.
(a) * * *
(6) There is no de minimis level for
foreign-made items that incorporate
U.S.-origin ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’
items when destined to a country listed
in Country Group D:5 of Supplement
No. 1 to part 740 of the EAR.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 736—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 736 continues to read as follows:
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note; E.O.
12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
950; E.O. 13020, 61 FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996
Comp., p. 219; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR
44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O.
13338, 69 FR 26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p.
168; Notice of May 9, 2012, 77 FR 27559
(May 10, 2012); Notice of August 15, 2012,
77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012); Notice of
November 1, 2012, 77 FR 66513 (November
5, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
4. Section 736.2 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(3)(iii) through (v)
to read as follows:
§ 736.2 General prohibitions and
determination of applicability.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Additional country scope of
prohibition for ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600
series’’ items. You may not, except as
provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(v) or (vi)
of this section, reexport or export from
abroad without a license any ‘‘500
series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ item subject to
the scope of this General Prohibition
Three to a destination in Country
Groups D:1, D:3, D:4, D:5 or E:1 (See
Supplement No.1 to part 740 of the
EAR).
(iv) Product scope of ‘‘500 series’’ and
‘‘600 series’’ items subject to this
prohibition. This General Prohibition
Three applies if a ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600
series’’ item meets either of the
following conditions:
(A) Conditions defining direct product
of ‘‘technology’’ or ‘‘software’’ for ‘‘500
series’’ and ‘‘600 series’’ items. Foreignmade ‘‘500 series’’ and ‘‘600 series’’
items are subject to this General
Prohibition Three if the foreign-made
items meet both of the following
conditions:
(1) They are the direct product of
‘‘technology’’ or ‘‘software’’ that is in
the ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ as
designated on the applicable ECCN of
the Commerce Control List in
Supplement No. 1 to part 774 of the
EAR; and
(2) They are in the ‘‘500 series’’ or
‘‘600 series’’ as designated on the
applicable ECCN of the Commerce
Control List in part 774 of the EAR.
(B) Conditions defining direct product
of a plant for ‘‘500 series’’ and ‘‘600
series’’ items. Foreign-made ‘‘500
series’’ and ‘‘600 series’’ items are also
subject to this General Prohibition Three
if they are the direct product of a
complete plant or any major component
of a plant if both of the following
conditions are met:
(1) Such plant or major component is
the direct product of ‘‘500 series’’ or
‘‘600 series’’ ‘‘technology’’ as designated
on the applicable ECCN of the
Commerce Control List in part 774 of
the EAR, and
(2) Such foreign-made direct products
of the plant or major component are in
the ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ as
designated on the applicable ECCN of
the Commerce Control List in part 774
of the EAR.
(v) ‘‘500 series’’ and ‘‘600 series’’
foreign-produced direct products of U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘technology’’ or ‘‘software’’ subject to
this General Prohibition Three do not
require a license for reexport or export
from abroad to the new destination
unless the same item, if exported from
the U.S. to the new destination would
have been prohibited or made subject to
a license requirement by part 742, 744,
746, or 764 of the EAR.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 740—[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 740 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77
FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
6. Section 740.2 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(12) and adding
paragraph (a)(17) to read as follows:
■
§ 740.2 Restrictions on all License
Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(12) The item is described in a ‘‘500
series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ ECCN and is
destined to, shipped from, or was
manufactured in a destination listed in
Country Group D:5 (see Supplement
No.1 to part 740 of the EAR), except that
such items are eligible for License
Exception GOV (§ 740.11(b)(2) of the
EAR) unless otherwise restricted by that
paragraph.
*
*
*
*
*
(17) ‘‘500 series’’ items that are
controlled for missile technology (MT)
reasons may not be exported,
reexported, or transferred (in-country)
under License Exception STA (§ 740.20
of the EAR). Items controlled under
ECCNs 9D515.b through .g and 9E515.b
are not eligible for license exceptions
except for License Exception GOV
(§ 740.11(b)(2) of the EAR).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Section 740.9 is amended by
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(a) introductory text to read as follows:
§ 740.9 Temporary imports, exports, and
reexports (TMP).
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * * The references to various
countries and country groups in these
TMP-specific provisions do not limit or
amend the prohibitions in § 740.2 of the
EAR on the use of license exceptions
generally, such as for exports of ‘‘500
series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ items to
destinations in Country Group D:5.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Section 740.10 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(3)(viii), (a)(4)(ii),
(b)(3)(i)(F) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31439
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
§ 740.10 License Exception Servicing and
replacement of parts and equipment (RPL).
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(viii) ‘‘Parts,’’ ‘‘components,’’
‘‘accessories,’’ and ‘‘attachments’’
classified in ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’
ECCNs may not be exported or
reexported to a destination listed in
Country Group D:5 (see Supplement No.
1 to this part).
(4) * * *
(ii) The conditions described in
paragraph (a)(3) relating to replacement
of ‘‘parts,’’ ‘‘components,’’
‘‘accessories,’’ or ‘‘attachments’’
(excluding ‘‘500 series’’ and ‘‘600
series’’ ECCNs) do not apply to
reexports to a foreign country of ‘‘parts,’’
‘‘components,’’ ‘‘accessories,’’ or
‘‘attachments’’ as replacements in
foreign-origin products, if at the time
the replacements are furnished, the
foreign-origin product is eligible for
export to such country under any of the
License Exceptions in this part or the
foreign-origin product is not subject to
the EAR pursuant to § 734.4.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(F) Commodities or ‘‘software’’
‘‘subject to the EAR’’ and classified in
‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 Series’’ ECCNs may
not be exported or reexported to a
destination identified in Country Group
D:5 (see Supplement No. 1 to this part).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Section 740.20 is amended by
adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (d)(2) introductory text to
read as follows:
§ 740.20 License Exception Strategic
Trade Authorization (STA).
(d) * * *
(2) * * * Paragraph (d)(2)(vii) is also
required for transactions including ‘‘500
series’’ items.
PART 742—[AMENDED]
10. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 742 continues to read as follows:
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108–11, 117
Stat. 559; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181,
3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Presidential Determination
2003–23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May
16, 2003; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77 FR
49699 (August 16, 2012); Notice of November
1, 2012, 77 FR 66513 (November 5, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
11. Section 742.4 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii) and adding
paragraph (b)(1)(iii) to read as follows:
■
§ 742.4
National security.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) When destined to a country listed
in Country Group D:5 in Supplement
No. 1 to Part 740 of the EAR, however,
items classified under ‘‘500 series’’ or
‘‘600 series’’ ECCNs will be reviewed
consistent with United States arms
embargo policies (§ 126.1 of the ITAR).
(iii) When destined to the People’s
Republic of China or a country listed in
Country Group E:1 in Supplement No.
1 to Part 740 of the EAR, items classified
under any ‘‘500 series’’ ECCN will be
subject to a policy of denial.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Section 742.6 is amended by
revising the first and fourth sentence
and adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 742.6
Regional stability.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Applications for exports and
reexports of ‘‘500 series’’ and ‘‘600
series’’ items will be reviewed on a caseby-case basis to determine whether the
transaction is contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. * * * Applications for
export or reexport of items classified
under any ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’
ECCN requiring a license in accordance
with paragraph (a)(1) of this section will
also be reviewed consistent with United
States arms embargo policies (§ 126.1 of
the ITAR) if destined to a country set
forth in Country Group D:5 in
Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the
EAR. * * * When destined to the
People’s Republic of China or a country
listed in Country Group E:1 in
Supplement No. 1 to Part 740 of the
EAR, items classified under any ‘‘500
series’’ ECCN will be subject to a policy
of denial.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 748.8 Unique application and
submission requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(x) License application for a
transaction involving a ‘‘500 series’’ and
‘‘600 series’’ item that is equivalent to
a transaction previously approved under
an ITAR license or other approval.
■ 15. Supplement No. 1 to part 748
(BIS–748P, BIS–748P–A: Item
Appendix, and BIS–748P–B: End-User
Appendix; Multipurpose Application
Instructions) is amended by revising the
first and fifth sentences of Block 24 to
read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 748—Item
Appendix, and Bis–748P–B: End-User
Appendix; Multipurpose Application
Instructions
*
*
*
*
*
Block 24: Additional Information
This Block should be completed if your
application includes a ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600
series’’ item that is equivalent to a
transaction previously approved under an
ITAR license or other approval. * * * The
classification of the ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600
series’’ item in question will no longer be the
same because the item would no longer be
‘‘subject to the ITAR,’’ but all other aspects
of the description of the item must be the
same in order to be reviewed under this
expedited process under paragraph (x) of
Supplement No. 2 to part 748 of the EAR.
*
*
*
*
*
16. Supplement No. 2 to part 748
(Unique Application and Submission
Requirements) is amended by revising
paragraph (x) to read as follows:
■
Supplement No. 2 to Part 748—Unique
Application and Submission
Requirements
*
*
*
*
*
(x) License application for a transaction
involving a‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ item
that is equivalent to a transaction previously
approved under an ITAR license or other
approval. To request that the U.S.
Government review of a license application
for a ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ item also
take into consideration a previously
approved ITAR license or other approval,
applicants must also include the State license
number or other approval identifier in Block
24 of the BIS license application (see the
instructions in Supplement No. 1 to part 748
under Block 24).
PART 748—[AMENDED]
*
13. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 748 continues to read as follows:
PART 758—[AMENDED]
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767,
3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16,
2012).
14. Section 748.8 is amended by
revising paragraph (x) to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
17. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 758 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
18. Section 758.1 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(3) to read as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31440
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
§ 758.1 The Automated Export System
(AES) record.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) For all exports of ‘‘500 series’’ or
‘‘600 series’’ items enumerated in
paragraphs .a through .x of a ‘‘500
series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ ECCN regardless
of value or destination, including
exports to Canada;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Section 758.2, as amended April
16, 2013, at 78 FR 22726, is further
amended by revising paragraph (c)(4) to
read as follows:
§ 758.2
Automated Export System (AES).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Exports are made under License
Exception Strategic Trade Authorization
(STA); are made under Authorization
Validated End User (VEU); or are of
‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’ items.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Section 758.6, as amended April
16, 2013, at 78 FR 22726, is further
amended by revising paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
product group. The ‘‘500 series’’
constitutes the ‘‘spacecraft’’ ECCNs
within the larger CCL. The ‘‘500 series’’
does not include items designated in
ECCNs 0A521, 0B521, 0C521, 0D521, or
0E521.
*
*
*
*
*
‘‘Space-qualified’’. (Cat 3, 6, and 9)
Designed, manufactured, or qualified
through successful testing, for operation
at altitudes greater than 100 km above
the surface of the Earth.
Note: A determination that a specific item
is ‘‘space qualified’’ by virtue of testing does
not mean that other items in the same
production run or model series are ‘‘space
qualified’’ if not individually tested.
Note: The terms ‘designed’ and
‘manufactured’ in this definition are
synonymous with ‘‘specially designed.’’
Thus, for example, an item that is ‘‘specially
designed’’ for a spacecraft is deemed to be
‘designed’ or ‘manufactured’ for operation at
altitudes greater than 100 km and an item
that is not ‘‘specially designed’’ for a
spacecraft is not deemed to have been so
‘designed’ or ‘manufactured.’
§ 758.6 Destination control statement and
other information furnished to consignees.
*
*
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
22. Section 772.1 is amended by
adding, in alphanumerical order, a
definition for the term ‘‘500 series’’ and
revising the definition for the term
‘‘space-qualified’’ as set forth below:
■
§ 772.1 Definitions of terms as used in the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR).
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
500 series. ECCNs in the ‘‘xY5zz’’
format on the Commerce Control List
(CCL) that control ‘‘dual use’’
‘‘spacecraft’’ and related items on the
CCL that were previously controlled on
the United States Munitions List. The
‘‘5’’ indicates the entry is a ‘‘spacecraft’’
entry on the CCL. The ‘‘x’’ represents
the CCL category and ‘‘Y’’ the CCL
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
*
*
*
MT Column
1
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: (1) See Category XV of the
USML for certain ‘‘space qualified’’
electronics ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22
CFR parts 120 through 130). (2) See also
3A101, 3A201, 3A991, and 9A515. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Related Definitions: ‘Microcircuit’ means a
device in which a number of passive or
active elements are considered as
indivisibly associated on or within a
continuous structure to perform the
function of a circuit. * * *
25. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 3, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 3A002 to
read as follows:
■
PART 774—[AMENDED]
*
*
*
*
(b) Additional Requirement for ‘‘500
series’’ and ‘‘600 series’’ items. In
addition to the DCS as required in
paragraph (a) of this section, the ECCN
for each ‘‘500 series’’ or ‘‘600 series’’
item being exported must be printed on
the invoice and on the bill of lading, air
waybill, or other export control
document that accompanies the
shipment from its point of origin in the
United States to the ultimate consignee
or end user abroad.
■ 21. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 772 continues to read as follows:
*
MT applies to 3A001.a.1.a for
‘microcircuits’ ‘‘usable in’’
‘‘missiles’’ for protecting
‘‘missiles’’ against nuclear
effects (e.g. Electromagnetic
Pulse (EMP), X-rays, combined blast and thermal effects) and to 3A001.a.5.a
when ‘‘designed or modified’’ for military use, hermetically sealed and rated
for operation in the temperature range from below ¥54
°C to above +125 °C.
*
23. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 774 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u);
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.
1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77
FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
24. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 3, revise the MT paragraph of
the License Requirements section and
the Related Controls paragraphs (1) and
(2) and add a new sentence to the
beginning of the Related Definitions
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 3A001 to
read as follows:
■
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774—The
Commerce Control List
3A002 General purpose electronic
‘‘equipment’’ and ‘‘accessories’’ therefor, as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: See Category XV(e)(9) of
the USML for certain ‘‘space qualified’’
atomic frequency standards ‘‘subject to the
ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130).
See also 3A292 and 3A992.
*
*
*
*
*
26. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 3, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 3D001 to
read as follows:
■
3D001 ‘‘Software’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
the ‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ of
‘‘equipment’’ controlled by 3A001.b to
3A002.g or 3B (except 3B991 and 3B992).
*
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
3A001 Electronic ‘‘components’’ and
‘‘specially designed’’ ‘‘parts’’ and
‘‘components’’ therefor, as follows (see
List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Related Controls: ‘‘Software’’ ‘‘specially
designed’’ for the ‘‘development’’ or
‘‘production’’ of certain ‘‘space qualified’’
atomic frequency standards described in
Category XV(e)(9) of the USML is ‘‘subject
to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts 120 through
130). See also 3D101.
*
*
*
PO 00000
*
*
*
*
Frm 00013
*
*
Fmt 4702
*
*
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
27. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 3, revise the License Exception
TSR and Related Controls paragraphs of
■
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31441
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130). (2) See
also 5A101 and 5A991.
Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) 3E001 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
30. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 5, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 5A991 to
read as follows:
3E001 ‘‘Technology’’ according to the
General Technology Note for the
‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ of
‘‘equipment’’ or ‘‘materials’’ controlled by
3A (except 3A292, 3A980, 3A981, 3A991,
3A992, or 3A999), 3B (except 3B991 or
3B992) or 3C (except 3C992).
*
*
*
*
■
5A991 Telecommunication ‘‘equipment,’’
not controlled by 5A001 (see List of Items
Controlled).
*
License Exceptions
*
*
*
*
*
*
TSR: Yes, except N/A for MT, and
‘‘technology’’ specially designed for the
‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ of: (a)
Traveling Wave Tube Amplifiers described
in 3A001.b.8, having operating frequencies
exceeding 19 GHz; and (b) solar cells,
coverglass-interconnect-cells or coveredinterconnect-cells (CIC) ‘‘assemblies,’’ solar
arrays and/or solar panels described in
3A001.e.4.
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: ‘‘Technology’’ according to
the General Technology Note for the
‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ of certain
‘‘space qualified’’ atomic frequency
standards described in Category XV(e)(9) of
the USML is ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22
CFR parts 120 through 130). See also 3E101
and 3E201.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 28. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 3, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 3E003 to
read as follows:
3E003 Other ‘‘technology’’ for the
‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ of the
following (see List of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: See also 5E101, 5E980 and
5E991.
*
*
*
*
*
31. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 5, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number 5E001 (ECCN) to
read as follows:
■
5E001 ‘‘Technology’’ as follows (see List of
Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
32. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 6, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 6A002 to
read as follows:
■
6A002 Optical sensors and ‘‘equipment,’’
‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components’’ therefor, as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: See 3E001 for the
‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ related to
radiation hardening of integrated circuits,
including silicon-on-insulation (SOI)
‘‘technology.’’
Related Controls: (1) See USML Categories
XII and XV for controls on ‘‘image
intensifiers’’ defined in 6A002.a.2 and
‘‘focal plane arrays’’ defined in 6A002.a.3
that are ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR
parts 120 through 130). (2) See also 6A102,
6A202, and 6A992.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
■ 29. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 5, revise the Related Controls
paragraph and remove the second note
to Items paragraph (a.3) of Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
5A001 to read as follows:
5A001 Telecommunications ‘‘systems,’’
‘‘equipment,’’ ‘‘parts,’’ ‘‘components’’ and
‘‘accessories,’’ as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
20:52 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: See also 6D991, and ECCN
6E001 (‘‘development’’) for ‘‘technology’’
for items controlled under this entry.
*
*
*
*
*
35. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 6, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 6D002 to
read as follows:
■
6D002 ‘‘Software’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
the ‘‘use’’ of ‘‘equipment’’ controlled by
6A002.b, 6A008 or 6B008.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: ‘‘Software’’ ‘‘specially
designed’’ for the ‘‘use’’ of ‘‘space
qualified’’ LIDAR ‘‘equipment’’ ‘‘specially
designed’’ for surveying or for
meteorological observation, released from
control under the note in 6A008.j, is
controlled in 6D991. See also 6D102,
6D991, and 6D992.
*
*
*
*
*
36. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 6, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 6E001 to
read as follows:
■
6E001 ‘‘Technology’’ according to the
General Technology Note for the
‘‘development’’ of ‘‘equipment,’’ ‘‘materials’’
or ‘‘software’’ controlled by 6A (except
6A991, 6A992, 6A994, 6A995, 6A996,
6A997, or 6A998), 6B (except 6B995), 6C
(except 6C992 or 6C994), or 6D (except
6D991, 6D992, or 6D993).
*
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: See also 6E101, 6E201, and
6E991.
*
*
*
*
*
37. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 6, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 6E002 to
read as follows:
■
Related Controls: (1) For optical mirrors or
‘aspheric optical elements’ ‘‘specially
designed’’ for lithography ‘‘equipment,’’
see ECCN 3B001. (2) See also 6A994.
6E002 ‘‘Technology’’ according to the
General Technology Note for the
‘‘production’’ of ‘‘equipment’’ or ‘‘materials’’
controlled by 6A (except 6A991, 6A992,
6A994, 6A995, 6A996, 6A997 or 6A998), 6B
(except 6B995) or 6C (except 6C992 or
6C994).
*
*
*
Related Controls: (1) See USML Category XI
for direction finding ‘‘equipment’’ defined
in 5A001.e that are ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
6A004 Optical ‘‘equipment,’’ ‘‘parts’’ and
‘‘components,’’ as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
List of Items Controlled
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
■ 33. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 6, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 6A004 to
read as follows:
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
Related Controls: See also 5E101, 5E980, and
5E991.
*
*
List of Items Controlled
List of Items Controlled
*
6D001 ‘‘Software’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
the ‘‘development’’ or ‘‘production’’ of
‘‘equipment’’ controlled by 6A004, 6A005,
6A008 or 6B008.
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
34. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 6, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 6D001 to
read as follows:
■
PO 00000
*
*
*
*
Frm 00014
*
*
Fmt 4702
*
*
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
*
*
24MYP1
*
*
31442
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: See also 6E992.
*
*
*
*
*
38. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 7, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 7A004 to
read as follows:
■
7A004 ‘Star trackers’ and components
therefor, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, MT, RS, AT
*
*
*
*
*
■ 39. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 7, revise the Related Controls
paragraph of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 7A104 to
read as follows:
7A104 Gyro-astro compasses and other
devices, other than those controlled by
7A004, which derive position or orientation
by means of automatically tracking celestial
bodies or satellites and specially designed
components therefor.
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: (1) See USML Categories IV
and XV for certain ‘Star trackers’ that are
‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts
120 through 130). (2). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
40. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 9, revise the Related Controls
paragraphs (1) and (3) through (5), and
remove items paragraph (b) from the
Items paragraph in the List of Items
Controlled of Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 9A004 to
read as follows:
■
9A004 Space launch vehicles and
‘‘spacecraft’’.
*
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls:
(1) See also 9A104, 9A515, and 9B515.
(2) * * *
(3) Spacecraft, launch vehicles and related
articles that are enumerated in the USML are
‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts 120
through 130).
(4) All other ‘‘spacecraft’’ and related
commodities not controlled under 9A004 or
enumerated in the USML are controlled
under ECCN 9A515 and 9B515.
(5) Technical data required for the detailed
design, development, manufacturing, or
production of the international space station
remains ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
*
*
■ 41. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
between the entries for ECCNs 9A120
and 9A980, add new entry for ECCN
9A515 to read as follows:
9A515 ‘‘Spacecraft’’ and related
commodities, as follows (see List of
Items Controlled).
Related Controls: 1) See USML Category XV
for certain ‘Star trackers’ that are ‘‘subject
to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts 120 through
130).
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
parts 120 through 130). All technical data
and all defense services, including all
technical assistance, for launch of the
international space station, including launch
vehicle compatibility, integration, or
processing data, are ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’
(see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130).
20:52 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
Control(s)
Country chart
NS applies to entire entry .....
RS applies to entire entry .....
MT applies to 9A515.d when
‘‘usable in’’ ‘‘missiles’’ for
protecting ‘‘missiles’’
against nuclear effects
(e.g. Electromagnetic Pulse
(EMP), X-rays, combined
blast and thermal effects).
AT applies to entire entry ......
NS Column 1
RS Column 1
MT Column 1
AT Column 1
License Exceptions
LVS: $1500
GBS: N/A
CIV: N/A
STA: Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception
STA (§ 740.20(c)(2) of the EAR) may not be
used for any item in 9A515.
List of Items Controlled
Unit: End items in number; ‘‘parts,’’
‘‘components,’’ ‘‘accessories,’’ and
‘‘attachments’’ in $ value
Related Controls: Spacecraft, launch vehicles
and related articles that are enumerated in
the USML, and technical data (including
‘‘software’’) directly related thereto, launch
services, and launch failure analysis for
items in 9A515.a, are ‘‘subject to the
ITAR.’’ A license is required under the
ITAR for a ‘‘U.S. person’’ to provide
‘‘defense services’’ to a foreign person for
a ‘‘spacecraft’’ to be launched from outside
the United States, even if that ‘‘spacecraft’’
may be exported under License Exception
STA. See 22 CFR 120.9. All other
‘‘spacecraft,’’ as enumerated below and
defined in section 772.1, are subject to the
controls of this ECCN. See also ECCNs
3A001, 3A002, 3A991, 3A992, 6A002,
6A004, 6A008, and 6A998 for specific
‘‘space-qualified’’ items and 9A004 for the
International Space Station.
Related Definitions: N/A.
Items:
a. ‘‘Spacecraft,’’ including satellites,
manned or unmanned space vehicles,
whether designated developmental,
experimental, research or scientific, not
enumerated in USML Category XV.
Note: ECCN 9A515.a includes commercial
communications satellites, remote sensing
satellites not identified in USML Category
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
XV, planetary rovers, and planetary and
interplanetary probes.
b. Ground control systems and training
simulators ‘‘specially designed’’ for
telemetry, tracking, and control of the
‘‘spacecraft’’ in paragraph 9A515.a.
c. [Reserved]
d. Microelectronic circuits rated, certified,
or otherwise specified or described as
meeting or exceeding all the following
characteristics and that are ‘‘specially
designed’’ for defense articles, ‘‘600 series’’
items, or items controlled by 9A515:
(1) A total dose of 5 × 105 Rads (Si) (5 ×
103 Gy (Si));
(2) A dose rate upset threshold of 5 × 108
Rads (Si)/sec (5 × 106 Gy (Si)/sec);
(3) A neutron dose of 1 × 1014 n/cm2
(1 MeV equivalent);
(4) An uncorrected single event upset
sensitivity of 1 × 10¥10 errors/bit/day or less,
`
for the CREME–MC geosynchronous orbit,
Solar Minimum Environment for heavy ion
flux; and
(5) An uncorrected single event upset
sensitivity of 1 × 10¥3 errors/part or less for
a fluence of 1 × 107 protons/cm2 for proton
energy greater than 50 MeV.
Note 1: Application specific integrated
circuits (ASICs) ‘‘specially designed’’ for
defense articles are controlled by Category
XI(c) of the USML regardless of
characteristics.
Note 2: See 9A515.x for controls on ‘‘space
qualified’’ microelectronic circuits that are
not rated certified, or otherwise specified or
described as meeting or exceeding the
characteristics in paragraph .d.
Note 3: See 3A001.a for controls radiationhardened microelectronic circuits ‘‘subject to
the EAR’’ that are not controlled by 9A515.d
or 9A515.x.
Note 4: Microelectronic circuits that are
‘‘specially designed’’ for defense articles on
the USML or for ‘‘600 series’’ items are
controlled under 3A611.x.
e. through w. [Reserved]
x. ‘‘Parts,’’ ‘‘components,’’ ‘‘accessories’’
and ‘‘attachments’’ that are ‘‘space qualified’’
and not enumerated or controlled in the
USML, elsewhere within ECCN 9A515, or an
ECCN containing ‘‘space-qualified’’ as a
control criterion, i.e., 3A001.b.1, 3A001.e.4,
3A002.a.3, 3A002.g.1, 3A991.o, 3A992.b.3,
6A002.a.1, 6A002.b.2, 6A002.d.1, 6A002.e,
6A004.c and .d, 6A008.j.1, or 6A998.b.
Note 1: ‘‘Parts,’’ ‘‘components,’’
‘‘accessories,’’ and ‘‘attachments’’ specified
in USML subcategory XV(e) or enumerated in
other USML categories are subject to the
controls of that paragraph or category.
42. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
between the entries for ECCNs 9B117
and 9B990, add new entry for ECCN
9B515 to read as follows:
■
9B515 Test, inspection, and production
‘‘equipment’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
‘‘spacecraft’’ and related commodities, as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, RS, AT
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
31443
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Control(s)
Country chart
NS applies to entire entry .....
RS applies to entire entry .....
AT applies to entire entry ......
NS Column 1
RS Column 1
AT Column 1
License Exceptions
LVS: $1500; $5000 for 9B515.c.
GBS: N/A.
CIV: N/A.
STA: Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception
STA (§ 740.20(c)(2) of the EAR) may not be
used for any item in 9B515.
List of Items Controlled
Unit: N/A.
Related Controls: N/A.
Related Definitions: N/A.
Items:
a. Test, inspection, and production
‘‘equipment’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for the
‘‘production’’ or ‘‘development’’ of
commodities enumerated in ECCN 9A515 or
USML Category XV.
b. ‘‘Equipment,’’ cells, and stands
‘‘specially designed’’ for testing, analysis and
fault isolation of commodities enumerated in
ECCN 9A515, 9A004 or USML Category XV.
c. Environmental test chambers capable of
pressures below (10¥4) Torr, and ‘‘specially
designed’’ ‘‘components’’ therefor.
43. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
between the entries for ECCNs 9D105
and 9D990, add a new entry for ECCN
9D515 to read as follows:
■
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, RS, AT.
Control(s)
Country chart
NS applies to entire entry .....
RS applies to entire entry .....
AT applies to entire entry ......
NS Column 1
RS Column 1
AT Column 1
License Exceptions
CIV: N/A.
TSR: N/A.
STA: (1) Paragraph (c)(1) of License
Exception STA (§ 740.20(c)(1) of the EAR)
may not be used for 9D515.b through .g. (2)
Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception STA
(§ 740.20(c)(2) of the EAR) may not be used
for any ‘‘software’’ in 9D515.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Items Controlled
Unit: $ value.
Related Controls: ‘‘Software’’ directly related
to articles enumerated in USML Category
XV is subject to the control of USML
paragraph XV(f). See also ECCNs 3D001,
6D001, 6D002, and 6D991 for controls of
specific software ‘‘specially designed’’ for
certain ‘‘space qualified’’ items.
Related Definitions: N/A.
20:52 May 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
44. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
between the entries for ECCNs 9E102
and 9E990, add new entry for ECCN
9E515 to read as follows:
■
9D515 ‘‘Software’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
the ‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production’’ operation,
installation, maintenance, repair, overhaul,
or refurbishing of ‘‘spacecraft’’ and related
commodities, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Items:
a. ‘‘Software’’ (other than ‘‘software’’
controlled in paragraphs .b through .g of this
entry) ‘‘specially designed’’ for the
‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production,’’ operation,
installation, maintenance, repair, overhaul,
or refurbishing of commodities controlled by
ECCN 9A515 or ‘‘equipment’’ controlled by
9B515.
b. ‘‘Source code’’ that contains the
algorithms or control principles (e.g., clock
management), precise orbit determination
(e.g., ephemeris, pseudo range), signal
construct (e.g., pseudo-random noise (PRN)
anti-spoofing) ‘‘specially designed’’ for items
controlled by ECCN 9A515.
c. ‘‘Source code’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
the integration, operation, or control (i.e.,
use) of items controlled by ECCN 9A515.
d. ‘‘Source code’’ that contains algorithms
or modules ‘‘specially designed’’ for system,
subsystem, component, part, or accessory
calibration, manipulation, or control of items
controlled by ECCN 9A515.
e. ‘‘Source code’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
data assemblage, extrapolation, or
manipulation of items controlled by ECCN
9A515.
f. ‘‘Source code’’ that contains the
algorithms or control laws ‘‘specially
designed’’ for attitude, position, or flight
control of items controlled in ECCN 9A515.
g. ‘‘Source code’’ ‘‘specially designed’’ for
built-in test and diagnostics for items
controlled by ECCN 9A515.
9E515 ‘‘Technology’’ ‘‘required’’ for the
‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production,’’ operation,
installation, maintenance, repair, overhaul,
or refurbishing of ‘‘spacecraft’’ and related
commodities, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, MT, RS, AT
Control(s)
Country chart
NS applies to entire entry .....
MT applies to technology for
items in 9A515.d controlled
for MT reasons.
RS applies to entire entry .....
AT applies to entire entry ......
NS Column 1
MT Column 1
RS Column 1
AT Column 1
License Exceptions
CIV: N/A.
TSR: N/A.
STA: (1) Paragraph (c)(1) of License
Exception STA (§ 740.20(c)(1) of the EAR)
may not be used for 9E515.b. (2) Paragraph
(c)(2) of License Exception STA
(§ 740.20(c)(2) of the EAR) may not be used
for any ‘‘technology’’ in 9E515.
List of Items Controlled
Unit: $ value.
Related Controls: Technical data directly
related to articles enumerated in USML
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Category XV are subject to the control of
USML paragraph XV(f). See also ECCNs
3E001, 3E003, 6E001, and 6E002 for
specific ‘‘space-qualified’’ items.
Related Definitions: N/A.
Items:
a. ‘‘Technology’’ ‘‘required’’ for the
‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production,’’ operation,
installation, maintenance, repair, overhaul
or refurbishing of commodities controlled
by ECCN 9A515, ‘‘equipment’’ controlled
by 9B515, or ‘‘software’’ controlled by
9D515.
Note: ‘‘Build-to-print technology’’ excluded
from paragraph b. is classified under
9E515.a.
b. ‘‘Technology’’ (other than ‘‘build-toprint technology’’) ‘‘required’’ for the
‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production,’’ design
verification, manufacturability, or quality
control for items in ECCN 9A515, except
items in ECCN 9A515.b.
45. In Supplement No. 4 to Part 774,
add three sentences to the conclusion of
paragraph (a)(3) and one sentence to the
conclusion of paragraph (a)(4) and
revise the first sentence of paragraph
(a)(5), to read as follows:
■
Supplement No. 3 to Part 774—Commerce
Control List Order of Review
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) Step 3. * * * The 9x515 ECCNs
describe satellites, related items, and some
types of radiation-hardened microelectronic
circuits that were once subject to the ITAR
under USML Category XV. Similarly, the first
step when determining the classification
status of such items that are no longer listed
on USML Category XV is to determine
whether they are controlled in a 9x515
ECCN. If so, the item is classified under that
9x515 ECCN paragraph. If not, then one
needs to review the rest of the CCL to
determine whether the item is within the
scope of another ECCN.
(4) Step 4. * * * Similarly, if a satellite,
related item, or radiation-hardened
microelectric circuit are not described in
9A515, then review 9A515.x to determine if
it is controlled there as a result of being
‘‘space qualified.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Step 5. If an item is not classified by
a ‘‘600 series’’ or ‘‘500 series’’ ECCN, then
starting from the beginning of the product
group analyze each ECCN to determine
whether any other ECCN in that product
group describes the item. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 14, 2013.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–11986 Filed 5–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 101 (Friday, May 24, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31431-31443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11986]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 734, 736, 740, 742, 748, 758, 772, and 774
[Docket No. 130110030-3030-01]
RIN 0694-AF87
Export Administration Regulations (EAR): Control of Spacecraft
Systems and Related Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant
Control Under the United States Munitions List (USML)
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule describes how certain articles the
President determines no longer warrant control under United States
Munitions List (USML) Category XV--spacecraft and related items--would
be controlled on the Commerce Control List (CCL). Such items would be
controlled by new Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) 9A515,
9B515, 9D515, and 9E515 proposed by this rule and existing ECCNs. This
is one in a planned series of proposed rules describing how various
types of articles the President determines, as part of the
Administration's Export Control Reform Initiative, no longer warrant
USML control, would be controlled on the CCL and by the EAR. This
proposed rule is being published in conjunction with a proposed rule
from the Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,
which would amend the list of articles controlled by USML Category XV.
The revisions proposed in this rule are part of Commerce's
retrospective regulatory review plan under EO 13563 completed in August
2011.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
The identification number for this rulemaking is BIS-2013-0012.
By email directly to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include
RIN 0694-AF87 in the subject line.
By mail or delivery to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau
of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2099B, 14th
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Refer to RIN
0694-AF87.
Commerce's full plan can be accessed at: https://open.commerce.gov/
news/
[[Page 31432]]
2011/08/23/commerce-plan-retrospective-analysis-existing-rules.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about the ECCNs included
in this rule contact Dennis Krepp, Office of National Security and
Technology Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Telephone: 202-482-1309, Email:
Dennis.Krepp@bis.doc.gov. For general questions about the ``500
series'' regulatory changes, contact Robert Monjay, Regulatory Policy
Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security,
at 202-482-2440 or Robert.Monjay@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 2, 2013, President Obama signed the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (``2013 NDAA'') (Pub. L. 112-
239). Section 1261 of the 2013 NDAA amended Section 1513 of the Strom
Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999
(``1999 NDAA'') by striking the requirement that all satellites and
related items be subject to the export control jurisdiction of the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120
through 130). The President is now authorized and obligated, pursuant
to section 38(f) of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22 U.S.C.
2778(f)), to review the USML ``to determine what items, if any, no
longer warrant export controls under'' the AECA.
This notice requests public comment on the changes described in
this proposed rule and the corresponding State Department's proposed
revisions to the ITAR. These rulemakings are the Administration's first
step in implementing the authorities returned to the President by the
2013 NDAA to determine the proper and more tailored controls over the
export of satellites and related items as recommended by the
Departments of Defense (DOD) and State. These two proposed rules are
part of the Administration's larger Export Control Reform effort
described, inter alia, in the Commerce Department's July 15, 2011
proposed rule (76 FR 41958) (``July 15 (framework) rule'') setting up a
structure to control in the EAR items that the President determines no
longer warrant control under the ITAR in accordance with section 38(f)
of the AECA. On November 7, 2011, BIS published a proposed rule (76 FR
68675) (``November 7 (aircraft) rule'') that proposed several changes
to the framework in the July 15 proposed rule. On June 19, 2012, BIS
published a proposed rule to define the term ``specially designed'' (77
FR 36409) (``the June 19 (specially designed) rule''). On June 21,
2012, BIS published a rule entitled Proposed Revisions to the Export
Administration Regulations: Implementation of Export Control Reform;
Revisions to License Exceptions After Retrospective Regulatory Review,
(77 FR 37524) (``the June 21 (transition) rule''). Readers may find it
useful to review these four proposed rules when preparing their
comments on this proposed rule. Generally following the structure of
the July 15 (framework) and the November 7 (aircraft) rules, this
proposed rule describes BIS's proposal for controlling under the EAR's
CCL the ``spacecraft'' and related articles now controlled under
Category XV of the ITAR's United States Munitions List (22 CFR part
121) (USML) that would not be controlled under the revised USML
Category XV.
In March 2012, the Departments of Defense and State filed with
Congress their ``Final Report'' required by section 1248 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2010. See https://www.defense.gov/home/features/2011/0111_nsss/docs/1248_Report_Space_Export_Control.pdf (the ``1248 Report''). The 1248 Report
identified the types of satellites and related items that should not be
designated as ``defense articles'' controlled under the ITAR. ``For the
sake of national and economic security, the Departments recommend[ed]
that authority to determine the appropriate export control status of
satellites and space-related items be returned to the President.'' Id.
The changes described in this proposed rule and in the State
Department's companion proposed rule on Category XV of the USML are
based on a review of Category XV by the Defense Department, which, as
described in the 1248 Report, worked with the Departments of State and
Commerce in preparing the proposed amendments.
The Defense Department reviewed the articles in Category XV to
determine which are either (i) inherently military and otherwise
warrant control on the USML or (ii) if, common to non-military space
applications, possess parameters or characteristics that provide a
critical military or intelligence advantage to the United States, and
that are almost exclusively available from the United States. If an
article satisfied one or both of those criteria, the article remained
on the USML. All other satellites and related items are, pursuant to
the State and Commerce Department notices, proposed to move to the
export control jurisdiction of the EAR. The licensing requirements and
other EAR-specific controls for such items described in this notice
would enhance national security by permitting the U.S. Government to
focus its resources on controlling, monitoring, investigating,
analyzing, and, if need be, prohibiting exports and reexports of more
significant items to destinations, end uses, and end users of greater
concern than NATO allies and other multi-regime partners.
In the July 15 (framework) rule, BIS proposed creating a ``600
series'' for the new ECCNs to control the munitions items that would be
removed from the USML and items currently on the CCL that are also on
the Wassenaar Arrangement Munitions List (WAML). This rule proposes to
create a new ``500 series'' of ECCNs to control ``spacecraft'' systems
and associated equipment that would be removed from the USML. This new
series would be created for ``spacecraft'' systems and associated
equipment because, although these items are currently on the USML, many
of them are commercial items with no military or intelligence
applications, such as commercial communications satellites. It would be
inappropriate to include these types of items in the ``600 series,''
which is, by definition, comprised of munitions items. Additionally,
because many items proposed to be moved in this rule do have military
or intelligence applications, it would be unnecessarily complicated and
confusing to move certain ``spacecraft'' systems and associated
equipment to new ``600 series'' ECCNs while moving the commercial items
to existing ECCNs. The creation of a new series would provide a place
for ``spacecraft'' systems and associated equipment transferred from
the USML, and would allow BIS to apply the appropriate controls to
these items. The new series would be identified as the ``500 series''
because the third character in each of the new ECCNs would be a ``5.''
The first two characters of the 500 series ECCNs serve the same
function as any other ECCN as described in Sec. 738.2 of the EAR. The
first character is a digit in the range 0 through 9 that identifies the
Category on the CCL in which the ECCN is located. In addition, it would
be inappropriate to put these new controls in one of the multilateral
controls of the CCL, such as the ``000 series'' for items controlled
under the Wassenaar Arrangement, because none of the items described in
proposed ECCN 9x515 in this notice are exclusively subject to
multilateral United States controls.
Although the items in the proposed new 9x515 ECCNs would not be
listed in the 600 series, the order of review for
[[Page 31433]]
the new ECCNs is similar to that for 600 series ECCNs. That is, when
determining whether an item that is now controlled under USML Category
XV would be controlled on the EAR if it is not within the scope of the
revised USML Category XV, one must first look to the 9x515 ECCNs. Only
if it is not controlled in one of the new ECCNs would one then look to
the remaining ECCNs in the CCL to determine whether the item is on the
CCL or, if not, an EAR99 item. The order of review guidance in
Supplement No. 4 to Part 774 is proposed to be amended accordingly.
The ECCNs created in this rule would begin with ``9,'' because that
is the corresponding CCL category for controls on ``spacecraft.'' The
second character is a letter in the range A through E that identifies
the product group within a CCL Category. In the ``500 series,'' the
third character is the number 5. The final two characters of the ECCNs
would be fifteen to identify the corresponding USML category that had
covered the items in the new ECCN. The ECCNs that would be created or
revised by this proposed rule are described more fully below.
BIS will publish additional Federal Register notices containing
proposed amendments to the CCL that will describe proposed controls for
additional categories of articles the President determines no longer
warrant control under the USML. The State Department will publish
concurrently proposed amendments to the USML that correspond to the BIS
notices. BIS will also publish proposed rules to further align the CCL
with the WAML and the Missile Technology Control Regime Equipment,
Software and Technology Annex.
The revisions proposed in this rule are part of Commerce's
retrospective regulatory review plan under EO 13563 completed in August
2011. Commerce's full plan can be accessed at: https://open.commerce.gov/news/2011/08/23/commerce-plan-retrospective-analysis-existing-rules.
Detailed Description of Changes Proposed by This Rule
This rule proposes changes to the text of the EAR as modified by
the Initial Implementation Rule of April 16, 2013 (78 FR 22660). BIS
made changes to the EAR in the Initial Implementation Rule that provide
the framework for the ``500 series.'' The changes made to the EAR in
the Initial Implementation Rule will be effective on October 15, 2013.
New 9X515 Series of ECCNs
This proposed rule would create four new ``500 series'' ECCNs in
CCL Category 9 (ECCNs 9A515, 9B515, 9D515, and 9E515) to describe the
EAR controls over the items the President determines no longer warrant
control under the USML Category XV and that are not otherwise within
the scope of an existing ECCN. Terms such as ``part'' and ``component''
and ``accessories'' and ``attachments'' are applied in the same manner
in this rule as those terms are defined in the Initial Implementation
Rule of April 16, 2013 (78 FR 22660). This rule would also add a new
definition for the ``500 series'' to Sec. 772.1. The new ``500
series'' would not include the International Space Station, which
remains under ECCN 9A004.
This rule also proposes to amend the related controls paragraph of
eighteen ECCNs--i.e., 3A001, 3A002, 3A611, 3D001, 3E001, 3E003, 5A001,
5A991, 5E001, 6A002, 6A004, 6D001, 6D002, 6E001, 6E002, 7A004, 7A104
and 9A004. The cross references to the USML for items listed in the
proposed USML Category XV would be revised. The cross references to the
USML for items that are proposed to transition from Category XV of the
USML would be removed. This rule additionally proposes to remove
paragraph .b from the List of Items Controlled in ECCN 9A004. Paragraph
.b was added to the CCL on March 15, 1999, when all satellites,
including commercial communications satellites, and related items were
transferred to the USML pursuant to the 1999 NDAA. Paragraph .b
provided a space on the CCL to control specific ``spacecraft'' related
items that were determined to be not subject to the ITAR through the
commodity jurisdiction procedure administered by the Department of
State. The new ``500 series'' ECCNs, specifically 9A515, would control
all ``spacecraft'' and related items that are not otherwise enumerated
on the USML or CCL. Therefore, it is appropriate to delete 9A004.b and
bring these ``spacecraft'' related items into the orbit of 9A515.
New ECCN 9X515
Proposed ECCN 9A515 paragraph .a would control ``spacecraft,''
including satellites, manned or unmanned space vehicles, whether
designated developmental, experimental, research or scientific, not
enumerated in USML Category XV. Paragraph 9A515.b would control ground
control systems and training simulators ``specially designed'' for
telemetry, tracking, and control of the ``spacecraft'' in paragraph
9A515.a. Paragraph .c would be reserved.
Paragraph .d would control certain radiation hardened
microelectronic circuits that are ``specially designed'' for defense
articles on the USML, ``600 series'' items, or items controlled by
9A515 that meet or exceed five specific characteristics. A reminder
note is proposed for ECCN 9A515.d to state that application specific
integrated circuits (ASICs) ``specially designed'' for defense articles
are controlled by Category XI(c) of the USML, regardless of
characteristics. A second note is proposed for ECCN 9A515.d that
``space qualified'' microelectronic circuits that do not meet the
radiation-hardening or other criterion of 9A515.d are controlled by
ECCN 9A515.x. A third note is proposed for ECCN 9A515.d to refer to
controls in 3A001.a for microelectronic circuits that are ``subject to
the EAR'' and not controlled by 9A515. A fourth note is proposed for
ECCN 9A515.d to state that microelectronic circuits ``specially
designed'' for defense articles on the USML (other than Category XV) or
``600 series'' items that do not meet the radiation hardening criteria
of paragraph .d would be controlled by the proposed ``600 series'' ECCN
3A611.
Paragraphs .e through .w would be reserved.
Paragraph .x would control ``parts,'' ``components,''
``accessories,'' and ``attachments'' that are ``space qualified'' and
not controlled on the USML, elsewhere within ECCN 9A515, or in one of
the existing ECCNs that has ``space qualified'' as a control criterion.
A note is proposed for ECCN 9A515.x to remind readers that ``parts,''
``components,'' and ``accessories'' and ``attachments'' specified in
USML subcategory XV(e) or enumerated in other USML categories are
subject to the controls of the USML.
New ECCN 9B515
Proposed ECCN 9B515 paragraph .a would control test, inspection,
and production ``equipment'' ``specially designed'' for the
``production'' or ``development'' of commodities enumerated in ECCN
9A515 or USML Category XV.
Paragraph .b would control ``equipment,'' cells, and stands
``specially designed'' for testing, analysis and fault isolation of
commodities enumerated in ECCN 9A515, 9A004 or USML Category XV.
Paragraph .c would control environmental test chambers capable of
pressures below (10-4) Torr, and ``specially designed''
``components'' therefor.
[[Page 31434]]
New ECCN 9D515
Proposed ECCN 9D515 would control ``software'' ``specially
designed'' for the ``development,'' ``production,'' operation,
installation, maintenance, repair, overhaul, or refurbishing of
commodities controlled by ECCNs 9A515 and 9B515.
New ECCN 9E515
Proposed ECCN 9E515 paragraph .a would control ``technology''
``required'' for the ``development,'' ``production,'' operation,
installation, maintenance, repair, overhaul or refurbishing of items
controlled by ECCN 9A515, 9B515, or 9D515.
The appendix to the 1248 Report referred to a possible need to
control technology required for passenger participation in space travel
(e.g., sub-orbital, orbital, lunar, interplanetary or habitat) for
space tourism, research or scientific endeavors, or transportation from
one point to another for commercial purposes. The Departments of
Defense and State have since reviewed such technology and concluded
that it is not per se now subject to USML Category XV. There is thus no
proposed inclusion of such technology as a general matter in either the
proposed USML Category XV or the proposed 9E515. To the extent other
technology described in either the proposed USML XV or 9E515 would be
released to a foreign person during such activities, then it would be
controlled according to the requirements of the relevant paragraph.
Applicable controls for new ``500 series'' ECCNs.
All items in the 9X515 ECCNs, as proposed in this rule, would be
subject to national security (NS Column 1) and regional stability (RS
Column 1) controls, as well as antiterrorism (AT Column 1) controls.
Some of the items would be subject to missile technology (MT) controls
in some cases. The licensing policy would be a case-by-case review to
determine whether the transaction is contrary to the national security
or foreign policy interests of the United States. However, applications
for ``500 series'' items destined to a country listed in Country Group
D:5 (Supplement No. 1 to Part 740) as a country subject to a U.S. arms
embargo will be reviewed consistent with United States arms embargo
policies. Country Group D:5 (Supplement No. 1 to Part 740) is set out
in the Initial Implementation Rule of April 16, 2013 (78 FR 22660). The
U.S. Government has long considered U.S. arms embargo policies when
reviewing license applications to export items subject to the EAR. BIS
has now explicitly stated that the review policy for all ``600 series''
items will be consistent with U.S. arms embargos. DOD and the State
Department recommended in the 1248 Report to Congress that BIS
explicitly adopt this review policy for items transitioning from the
USML to ensure that exporters are aware that all items subject to
embargo remain so on the CCL. BIS agrees with this recommendation and
would amend Sec. Sec. 742.4(b)(1)(ii) and 742.6(b)(1) to add the term
``500 series.'' Additionally, as required by Section 1261 of the 2013
NDAA, applications for ``500 series'' items destined to the People's
Republic of China, North Korea, or any country that is a state sponsor
of terrorism, would be subject to a policy of denial.
``Space-Qualified''
In December 2012, the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for
Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies (``Wassenaar
Arrangement'') amended its definition of ``space-qualified'' to be
``[d]esigned, manufactured, or qualified through successful testing,
for operation at altitudes greater than 100 km above the surface of the
Earth. Note: A determination that a specific item is ``space
qualified'' by virtue of testing does not mean that other items in the
same production run or model series are ``space qualified'' if not
individually tested.'' BIS plans to adopt this definition in the EAR
when it publishes its amendments to the EAR to implement the amendments
agreed to by the Wassenaar Arrangement. To comment on the proposed
changes to the EAR in this notice that pertain to the meaning of
``space-qualified,'' the public should use the above definition.
The Wassenaar Arrangement adopted the revised definition after the
Departments of State and Defense submitted to Congress the 1248 Report,
describing the proposed controls on ``space qualified'' items not
controlled elsewhere. In addition, the revised definition was adopted
after the U.S. Government had received and considered public comments
on its proposed definition of ``specially designed,'' which would be
the control parameter in its other ``.x'' catch-all controls. In order
to (i) maintain the ``space qualified'' control scope described in the
1248 Report, (ii) maintain consistency between this catch-all control
and the other ``space qualified'' controls in the CCL, and (iii) limit
the ambiguity between the scope of this catch-all approach and the
other new ``.x'' catch-alls that use ``specially designed,'' BIS is
proposing the addition of a note to the new ``space qualified''
definition. The note would state that, for purposes of these controls,
the terms `designed' and `manufactured' in the Wassenaar's definition
of ``space qualified'' are synonymous with the EAR's new definition of
``specially designed.'' Thus, for example, an item that is ``specially
designed'' for a spacecraft is deemed to be `designed' or
`manufactured' for operation at altitudes greater than 100 km and an
item that is not ``specially designed'' for a spacecraft is not deemed
to have been so `designed' or `manufactured.' An implication of this
note would be that an item that becomes ``space qualified'' by virtue
of successful testing would be ``space qualified'' regardless of
whether it would be considered ``specially designed.'' This note does
not constitute a modification of the Wassenaar definition of the term,
only a comment about how it is relates to the EAR's definition of
``specially designed.''
Effects of This Proposed Rule
De minimis
Items made outside the United States that incorporate items subject
to the EAR are subject to the EAR if they exceed a de minimis
percentage of controlled U.S.-origin content, as described in Sec.
734.3 of the EAR. The Initial Implementation Rule of April 16, 2013 (78
FR 22660) established the de minimis threshold for a foreign-made item
that incorporates U.S.-origin ``600 series'' items at zero percent when
the foreign-made item is destined for a country subject to a U.S. arms
embargo and 25 percent for destinations that are not subject to a U.S.
arms embargo. This rule proposes to adopt the same de minimis
thresholds for the ``500 series'' as is proposed for the ``600
series.'' Foreign-made items that incorporate any amount of U.S.-origin
``500 series'' items would be subject to the EAR when destined to a
country that is subject to a U.S. arms embargo (i.e., Afghanistan,
Belarus, Burma, China, Cote d'Ivoire, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic Republic
of Congo, Eritrea, Fiji, Haiti, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya,
North Korea, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Vietnam, and
Zimbabwe). A foreign-made item that incorporates U.S.-origin ``500
series'' items, destined to a country that is not subject to a U.S.
arms embargo, would be eligible for de minimis treatment and would not
be subject to the EAR if the value of all of its U.S.-origin controlled
content does not exceed 25 percent of foreign-made item's value.
[[Page 31435]]
Foreign-Produced Direct Product
The Initial Implementation Rule of April 16, 2013 (78 FR 22660)
expanded the foreign-produced direct products of U.S. ``technology''
that are subject to the EAR. Foreign-produced direct products of U.S.-
origin ``600 series'' ``technology,'' or of a plant or major component
of a plant that is a direct product of U.S.-origin ``600 series''
``technology,'' that are ``600 series'' items are proposed to be
subject to the EAR when reexported or exported from abroad to countries
listed in Country Groups D:1 (national security countries of concern),
D:3 (chemical and biological countries of concern), D:4 (missile
technology countries of concern), or E:1 (countries that support
terrorism) in Supplement No. 1 to part 740 or countries subject to a
U.S. arms embargo. Foreign-made items subject to the EAR because of
this rule are subject to the same license requirements to the new
country of destination as if they were of U.S. origin. This rule
proposes to extend the ``600 series'' direct product rule to items in
the ``500 series'' as well.
Use of License Exceptions
Most ``500 series'' items would be eligible for several license
exceptions, including STA, which would be available for exports to
certain countries that are NATO members or multi-regime close allies.
Certain items described in ECCNs 9D515 and 9E515, however, would not be
eligible for export under STA, as described in those ECCNs.
Additionally, the MT controlled commodities in 9A515 and some types of
technology in 9E515 would not be eligible for any license exceptions,
including STA. The use of STA for ``500 series'' items would require
the consignee to consent to an end-user check by the U.S. Government in
addition to the standard consignee statement required for all STA
transactions. ``600 series'' items are subject to additional criteria
for the use of License Exception STA. Specifically, the Ultimate
Consignee must be in an A:5 country and either (a) the ultimate end
user must be the government of an A:5 country or the United States
Government, or (b) the items must be for the ``development'' or
``production'' of an item in that will ultimately be used by any such
government agencies, the United States Government, or a person in the
United States. BIS is not proposing to make this ``600 series''
specific STA requirement applicable to the ``500 series.'' ``500
series'' items are not munitions items and are generally not intended
for ultimate end use by governmental end users. The majority of the
items in the ``500 series'' are commercial items, and while many of the
``parts'' and ``components'' have military or intelligence
applications, they are dual-use items that have commercial
applications. Therefore, the application of this requirement to the
``500 series'' would be inappropriate.
Items controlled under proposed ECCNs 9A515 and 9B515 would also be
eligible for License Exception LVS (limited value shipments) up to a
value of $1,500 ($5,000 for 9B515.c), TMP (temporary exports), GOV
(U.S. Government), and RPL (servicing and replacement parts). The use
of license exceptions for ``500 series'' items generally would be
prohibited to any destination subject to a U.S. arms embargo, except to
the U.S. Government under License Exception GOV.
License Applications
In a license application for a transaction involving ``500 series''
items that is equivalent to a transaction that was previously approved
by the State Department under the ITAR, the applicant may report the
ITAR license or other approval number to BIS in Block 24 of the license
application. Only those license applications where the particulars
(e.g., the function, performance capabilities, form and fit of the
item, the purchaser, ultimate consignee and end user(s)) are the same
in both the EAR license application and the previously issued ITAR
authorization would receive full consideration under this paragraph.
For example, if a U.S. company had an ITAR authorization to export
certain radiation hardened microchips that will be controlled under
9A515.d to a governmental end user in Japan, the company may list that
authorization in Block 24 if it plans to export more of the same chips
to the same end user in Japan. However, if the company wishes to export
the same chip to a commercial end user or the next generation of chip
to the same government end user, it may not list the prior
authorization as precedent. Block 24 would alert BIS and the other U.S.
Government agencies reviewing a particular ``500 series'' license
application that this new application to BIS concerns a transaction
that is equivalent to a previously approved transaction. This
information may be relevant to review of the transaction and may result
in an expedited determination.
Export Clearance
This rule proposes to adopt the ``600 series'' export clearance
requirements proposed in the June 21 (transition) rule. This rule would
revise Sec. 758.1 to require that information on all exports of ``500
series'' items be filed in AES regardless of value or destination. BIS
is required to report to Congress on all ``500 series'' exports and
would only be able to obtain information on low value unlicensed
shipments if an AES filing is made. This rule would also revise Sec.
758.2 to preclude the option of post-departure filing for exports of
``500 series'' items. This revision would maintain the current status
of these items under the ITAR as ineligible for post-departure filing.
Finally, this rule would revise Sec. 758.6 to require that the ECCN
for each ``500 series'' item being shipped be provided on the same
documents on which the Destination Control Statement is required. This
would require that the ECCN for each ``500 series'' item be entered on
the invoice and on the bill of lading, air waybill, or another export
control document that accompanies the shipment from its point of origin
in the United States to the ultimate consignee or end user abroad.
Order of Review
Supplement No. 4 to Part 774 would be amended to include a
reference to the new 9x515 ECCNs so that those engaging in
classification analyses of items formerly in USML Category XV but no
longer controlled under the amended USML Category XV know to review the
new 9X515 ECCNs before reviewing other potentially applicable ECCNs in
the CCL.
Request for Comments
BIS seeks comments on this proposed rule. BIS will consider all
comments received on or before July 8, 2013. All comments (including
any personally identifying information or information for which a claim
of confidentially is asserted either in those comments or their
transmittal emails) will be made available for public inspection and
copying. Parties who wish to comment anonymously may do so by
submitting their comments via Regulations.gov, leaving the fields that
would identify the commenter blank and including no identifying
information in the comment itself.
Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013), and as extended by the Notice of
August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012), has continued the
Export Administration Regulations in effect
[[Page 31436]]
under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to
carry out the provisions of the Export Administration Act, as
appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to Executive
Order 13222.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action,'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
control number. This proposed rule would affect two approved
collections: Simplified Network Application Processing System (control
number 0694-0088), which includes, among other things, license
applications, and License Exceptions and Exclusions (0694-0137).
BIS believes that the effect of adding items to the EAR that would
be removed from the ITAR as a result of this rule as part of the
administration's Export Control Reform Initiative would increase the
number of license applications to be submitted to BIS by approximately
1,500 annually, resulting in an increase in burden hours of 425 (1,500
transactions at 17 minutes each) under control number 0694-0088.
Most ``spacecraft'' and ground control systems, ``space qualified''
``parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories'' and ``attachments,'' and
related ``software'' and ``technology'' formerly on the USML would
become eligible for License Exception STA under this rule. BIS believes
that the increased use of License Exception STA resulting from the
effect of adding items to the EAR that would be removed from the ITAR
as a result of this rule as part of the administration's Export Control
Reform Initiative would increase the burden associated with control
number 0694-0137 by about 2,258 hours (1,935 transactions @ 1 hour and
10 minutes each).
BIS expects that this increase in burden would be more than offset
by a reduction in burden hours associated with approved collections
related to the ITAR. The largest impact of the proposed rule would
likely apply to exporters of parts, components, accessories, and
attachments specifically designed or modified for satellite and other
``spacecraft'' items that would have been approved for export under the
ITAR pursuant to a license for export to NATO allies and regime
partners. Because, with few exceptions, the ITAR allows exemptions from
license requirements only for certain exports to Canada, most exports
of such parts, even when destined to NATO and other allied countries,
require specific State Department authorization. Under the EAR, as
proposed in this notice, such ``parts'' and ``components'' would become
eligible for export to NATO and other multi-regime allies under License
Exception STA. Use of License Exception STA imposes a paperwork and
compliance burden because, for example, exporters must furnish
information about the item being exported to the consignee and obtain
from the consignee an acknowledgement and commitment to comply with the
EAR. However, the Administration understands that complying with the
burdens of STA is likely less burdensome than applying for licenses or
other approval from the State Department. For example, under License
Exception STA, a single consignee statement can apply to an unlimited
number of products, need not have an expiration date, and need not be
submitted to the government in advance for approval. Suppliers with
regular customers can tailor a single statement and assurance to match
their business relationship, rather than applying repeatedly for
licenses with every purchase order to supply reliable customers in
countries that are close allies or members of export control regimes or
both.
Even in situations in which a license would be required under the
EAR, the burden is likely to be reduced compared to the license
requirement of the ITAR. In particular, license applications for
exports of ``technology'' controlled by ECCN 9E515 are likely to be
less complex and burdensome than the authorizations required to export
ITAR-controlled ``technology,'' i.e., Manufacturing License Agreements
and Technical Assistance Agreements.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C.
601 et seq., generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to the notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 553) or any other statute, unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Under section 605(b) of the RFA, however, if
the head of an agency certifies that a rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities, the statute does not
require the agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Pursuant to section 605(b), the Chief Counsel for Regulation,
Department of Commerce, submitted a memorandum to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy, Small Business Administration, certifying that this proposed
rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. A summary of the factual basis for this certification
follows.
Number of Small Entities
BIS does not collect data on the size of entities that apply for
and are issued export licenses. Although BIS is unable to estimate the
exact number of small entities that would be affected by this rule, it
acknowledges that this rule would affect some unknown number.
Economic Impact
This proposed rule is part of the Administration's Export Control
Reform Initiative. Under that initiative, the USML (22 CFR part 121)
would be revised to be a ``positive'' list, i.e., a list that does not
use generic, catch-all controls on any part, component, accessory,
attachment, or end item that was in any way specifically modified for a
defense article, regardless of the article's military or intelligence
significance or non-military applications. At the same time, articles
that are determined to no longer warrant control on the USML would
become controlled on the CCL. ``Spacecraft'' and related items so
designated will be identified in specific ECCNs known as the ``500
series'' ECCNs. In practice, the greatest impact of this rule on small
entities would likely be reduced administrative costs and reduced delay
for exports of items that are now on the
[[Page 31437]]
USML but would become subject to the EAR.
Many ``spacecraft'' and specific parts and components would remain
on the USML. However, ``parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' and
``attachments'' for such ``equipment'' would be included on the CCL
unless expressly enumerated on the USML. Such ``parts'' and
``components'' are more likely to be produced by small businesses than
complete ``spacecraft,'' which would in many cases become subject to
the EAR. Moreover, officials at the Department of State have informed
BIS that license applications for such ``parts'' and ``components'' are
a high percentage of the license applications for USML articles
reviewed by that department. The proposed changes in this rule will not
result in the decontrol of such items, but will reduce administrative
and collateral regulatory burdens by, for example, allowing for the use
of License Exception STA for exports to NATO and other multi-regime
allied countries.
Thus, changing the jurisdictional status of certain Category XV
articles would reduce the burden on small entities (and other entities
as well) through: Elimination of some license requirements, greater
availability of license exceptions, simplification of license
application procedures, and reduction (or elimination) of registration
fees. In addition, parts and components controlled under the ITAR
remain under ITAR control when incorporated into foreign-made items,
regardless of the significance or insignificance of the item,
discouraging foreign buyers from incorporating such U.S. content.
Exporters and reexporters of the Category XV articles, particularly
``parts'' and ``components,'' that would be placed on the CCL by this
rule would need fewer licenses because their transactions would become
eligible for license exceptions that apply to shipments to United
States Government agencies, shipments valued at less than $1,500,
``parts'' and ``components'' being exported for use as replacement
parts, temporary exports, and License Exception Strategic Trade
Authorization (STA). License Exceptions under the EAR would allow
suppliers to send routine parts and low level parts to NATO and other
export control regime partner countries without having to obtain export
licenses. Under License Exception STA, the exporter would need to
furnish information about the item being exported to the consignee and
obtain a statement from the consignee that, among other things, would
commit the consignee to comply with the EAR and other applicable U.S.
laws.
Because such statements and obligations can apply to an unlimited
number of transactions and have no expiration date, they would impose a
net reduction in burden on transactions that the government routinely
approves through the license application process that the License
Exception STA statements would replace.
Even for exports and reexports in which a license would be
required, the process would be simpler and less costly under the EAR
than under the USML. When a USML Category XV article moves to the CCL,
the number of destinations for which a license is required would remain
unchanged. However, the burden on the license applicant would decrease
because the licensing procedure for CCL items is simpler and more
flexible than the license procedure for USML articles.
Under the USML licensing procedure, an applicant must include a
purchase order or contract with its application. There is no such
requirement under the CCL licensing procedure. This difference gives
the CCL applicant at least two advantages. First, the applicant has a
way of determining whether the U.S. Government will authorize the
transaction before it enters into potentially lengthy, complex, and
expensive sales presentations or contract negotiations. Under the USML
procedure, the applicant will need to caveat all sales presentations
with a reference to the need for government approval, and is more
likely to have to engage in substantial effort and expense only to find
that the government will reject the application. Second, a CCL license
applicant need not limit its application to the quantity or value of
one purchase order or contract. It may apply for a license to cover all
of its expected exports or reexports to a particular consignee over the
life of a license (normally four years, but may be longer if
circumstances warrant a longer period), reducing the total number of
licenses for which the applicant must apply.
In addition, many applicants, who are exporting or reexporting
items that this rule would transfer from the USML to the CCL, would
realize cost savings through the elimination of some or all
registration fees currently assessed under the USML's licensing
procedure. Currently, USML applicants must pay to use the USML
licensing procedure even if they never actually are authorized to
export. Registration fees for manufacturers and exporters of articles
on the USML start at $2,250 per year, increase to $2,750 for
organizations applying for one to ten licenses per year and further
increases to $2,750 plus $250 per license application (subject to a
maximum of three percent of total application value) for those who need
to apply for more than ten licenses per year.
There are no registration costs or application processing fees for
applications to export items listed on the CCL. Once the Category XV
articles that are the subject to this rulemaking are added to the CCL
and removed from the USML, entities currently applying for licenses
from the Department of State would find their registration fees reduced
if the number of USML licenses those entities need declines. If an
entity's entire product line is moved to the CCL, then its ITAR
registration and registration fee requirement would be eliminated and
it would no longer incur that expense.
De minimis treatment under the EAR would also become available for
all items that this rule would transfer from the USML to the CCL. Items
subject to the ITAR remain subject to the ITAR when they are
incorporated abroad into a foreign-made product, regardless of the
percentage of U.S. content in that foreign-made product. Foreign-made
products that incorporate items that this rule would move to the CCL
would be subject to the EAR only if their total controlled U.S.-origin
content exceeds 25 percent for most destinations. Because including
small amounts of U.S.-origin content would not subject foreign-made
products to the EAR, foreign manufacturers would have less incentive to
avoid such U.S.-origin ``parts'' and ``components,'' a development that
potentially would mean greater sales for U.S. suppliers, including
small entities.
Conclusion
BIS is unable to determine the precise number of small entities
that would be affected by this rule. Based on the facts and conclusions
set forth above, BIS believes that any burdens imposed by this rule
would be offset by the reduction in the number of items that would
require a license, increased opportunities for use of license
exceptions for exports to certain countries, simpler export license
applications, reduced or eliminated registration fees and application
of a de minimis threshold for foreign-made items incorporating U.S.-
origin ``parts'' and ``components,'' which would reduce the incentive
for foreign buyers to design out or avoid U.S.-origin content. For
these reasons, the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of
Commerce certified to
[[Page 31438]]
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
that this rule, if adopted in final form, would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Parts 734, 740, 748 and 758
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Parts 736 and 772
Exports.
15 CFR Parts 742 and 774
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts
730-774), as amended by the final rule published April 16, 2013 (78 FR
22660), effective October 15, 2013, are proposed to be further amended
as follows:
PART 734--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 734 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 13020, 61
FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012);
Notice of November 1, 2012, 77 FR 66513 (November 5, 2012).
0
2. Section 734.4 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(6) to read as
follows:
Sec. 734.4 De minimis U.S. content.
(a) * * *
(6) There is no de minimis level for foreign-made items that
incorporate U.S.-origin ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' items when
destined to a country listed in Country Group D:5 of Supplement No. 1
to part 740 of the EAR.
* * * * *
PART 736--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 736 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 2151 note; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
950; E.O. 13020, 61 FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O. 13026,
61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR 26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp.,
p. 168; Notice of May 9, 2012, 77 FR 27559 (May 10, 2012); Notice of
August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012); Notice of November
1, 2012, 77 FR 66513 (November 5, 2012).
0
4. Section 736.2 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(3)(iii) through
(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 736.2 General prohibitions and determination of applicability.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Additional country scope of prohibition for ``500 series'' or
``600 series'' items. You may not, except as provided in paragraphs
(b)(3)(v) or (vi) of this section, reexport or export from abroad
without a license any ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' item subject to
the scope of this General Prohibition Three to a destination in Country
Groups D:1, D:3, D:4, D:5 or E:1 (See Supplement No.1 to part 740 of
the EAR).
(iv) Product scope of ``500 series'' and ``600 series'' items
subject to this prohibition. This General Prohibition Three applies if
a ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' item meets either of the following
conditions:
(A) Conditions defining direct product of ``technology'' or
``software'' for ``500 series'' and ``600 series'' items. Foreign-made
``500 series'' and ``600 series'' items are subject to this General
Prohibition Three if the foreign-made items meet both of the following
conditions:
(1) They are the direct product of ``technology'' or ``software''
that is in the ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' as designated on the
applicable ECCN of the Commerce Control List in Supplement No. 1 to
part 774 of the EAR; and
(2) They are in the ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' as designated
on the applicable ECCN of the Commerce Control List in part 774 of the
EAR.
(B) Conditions defining direct product of a plant for ``500
series'' and ``600 series'' items. Foreign-made ``500 series'' and
``600 series'' items are also subject to this General Prohibition Three
if they are the direct product of a complete plant or any major
component of a plant if both of the following conditions are met:
(1) Such plant or major component is the direct product of ``500
series'' or ``600 series'' ``technology'' as designated on the
applicable ECCN of the Commerce Control List in part 774 of the EAR,
and
(2) Such foreign-made direct products of the plant or major
component are in the ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' as designated on
the applicable ECCN of the Commerce Control List in part 774 of the
EAR.
(v) ``500 series'' and ``600 series'' foreign-produced direct
products of U.S. ``technology'' or ``software'' subject to this General
Prohibition Three do not require a license for reexport or export from
abroad to the new destination unless the same item, if exported from
the U.S. to the new destination would have been prohibited or made
subject to a license requirement by part 742, 744, 746, or 764 of the
EAR.
* * * * *
PART 740--[AMENDED]
0
5. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 740 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
6. Section 740.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(12) and adding
paragraph (a)(17) to read as follows:
Sec. 740.2 Restrictions on all License Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(12) The item is described in a ``500 series'' or ``600 series''
ECCN and is destined to, shipped from, or was manufactured in a
destination listed in Country Group D:5 (see Supplement No.1 to part
740 of the EAR), except that such items are eligible for License
Exception GOV (Sec. 740.11(b)(2) of the EAR) unless otherwise
restricted by that paragraph.
* * * * *
(17) ``500 series'' items that are controlled for missile
technology (MT) reasons may not be exported, reexported, or transferred
(in-country) under License Exception STA (Sec. 740.20 of the EAR).
Items controlled under ECCNs 9D515.b through .g and 9E515.b are not
eligible for license exceptions except for License Exception GOV (Sec.
740.11(b)(2) of the EAR).
* * * * *
0
7. Section 740.9 is amended by revising the last sentence of paragraph
(a) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 740.9 Temporary imports, exports, and reexports (TMP).
* * * * *
(a) * * * The references to various countries and country groups in
these TMP-specific provisions do not limit or amend the prohibitions in
Sec. 740.2 of the EAR on the use of license exceptions generally, such
as for exports of ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' items to
destinations in Country Group D:5.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 740.10 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3)(viii),
(a)(4)(ii), (b)(3)(i)(F) to read as follows:
[[Page 31439]]
Sec. 740.10 License Exception Servicing and replacement of parts and
equipment (RPL).
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(viii) ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' and
``attachments'' classified in ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' ECCNs
may not be exported or reexported to a destination listed in Country
Group D:5 (see Supplement No. 1 to this part).
(4) * * *
(ii) The conditions described in paragraph (a)(3) relating to
replacement of ``parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' or
``attachments'' (excluding ``500 series'' and ``600 series'' ECCNs) do
not apply to reexports to a foreign country of ``parts,''
``components,'' ``accessories,'' or ``attachments'' as replacements in
foreign-origin products, if at the time the replacements are furnished,
the foreign-origin product is eligible for export to such country under
any of the License Exceptions in this part or the foreign-origin
product is not subject to the EAR pursuant to Sec. 734.4.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(F) Commodities or ``software'' ``subject to the EAR'' and
classified in ``500 series'' or ``600 Series'' ECCNs may not be
exported or reexported to a destination identified in Country Group D:5
(see Supplement No. 1 to this part).
* * * * *
0
9. Section 740.20 is amended by adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (d)(2) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 740.20 License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization (STA).
(d) * * *
(2) * * * Paragraph (d)(2)(vii) is also required for transactions
including ``500 series'' items.
PART 742--[AMENDED]
0
10. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 742 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 12058,
43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3
CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp.,
p. 950; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O.
13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Presidential
Determination 2003-23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003;
Notice of August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012); Notice of
November 1, 2012, 77 FR 66513 (November 5, 2012).
0
11. Section 742.4 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii) and
adding paragraph (b)(1)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 742.4 National security.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) When destined to a country listed in Country Group D:5 in
Supplement No. 1 to Part 740 of the EAR, however, items classified
under ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' ECCNs will be reviewed
consistent with United States arms embargo policies (Sec. 126.1 of the
ITAR).
(iii) When destined to the People's Republic of China or a country
listed in Country Group E:1 in Supplement No. 1 to Part 740 of the EAR,
items classified under any ``500 series'' ECCN will be subject to a
policy of denial.
* * * * *
0
12. Section 742.6 is amended by revising the first and fourth sentence
and adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (b)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 742.6 Regional stability.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Applications for exports and reexports of ``500 series'' and
``600 series'' items will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to
determine whether the transaction is contrary to the national security
or foreign policy interests of the United States. * * * Applications
for export or reexport of items classified under any ``500 series'' or
``600 series'' ECCN requiring a license in accordance with paragraph
(a)(1) of this section will also be reviewed consistent with United
States arms embargo policies (Sec. 126.1 of the ITAR) if destined to a
country set forth in Country Group D:5 in Supplement No. 1 to part 740
of the EAR. * * * When destined to the People's Republic of China or a
country listed in Country Group E:1 in Supplement No. 1 to Part 740 of
the EAR, items classified under any ``500 series'' ECCN will be subject
to a policy of denial.
* * * * *
PART 748--[AMENDED]
0
13. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 748 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77
FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
14. Section 748.8 is amended by revising paragraph (x) to read as
follows:
Sec. 748.8 Unique application and submission requirements.
* * * * *
(x) License application for a transaction involving a ``500
series'' and ``600 series'' item that is equivalent to a transaction
previously approved under an ITAR license or other approval.
0
15. Supplement No. 1 to part 748 (BIS-748P, BIS-748P-A: Item Appendix,
and BIS-748P-B: End-User Appendix; Multipurpose Application
Instructions) is amended by revising the first and fifth sentences of
Block 24 to read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 748--Item Appendix, and Bis-748P-B: End-User
Appendix; Multipurpose Application Instructions
* * * * *
Block 24: Additional Information
This Block should be completed if your application includes a
``500 series'' or ``600 series'' item that is equivalent to a
transaction previously approved under an ITAR license or other
approval. * * * The classification of the ``500 series'' or ``600
series'' item in question will no longer be the same because the
item would no longer be ``subject to the ITAR,'' but all other
aspects of the description of the item must be the same in order to
be reviewed under this expedited process under paragraph (x) of
Supplement No. 2 to part 748 of the EAR.
* * * * *
0
16. Supplement No. 2 to part 748 (Unique Application and Submission
Requirements) is amended by revising paragraph (x) to read as follows:
Supplement No. 2 to Part 748--Unique Application and Submission
Requirements
* * * * *
(x) License application for a transaction involving a``500
series'' or ``600 series'' item that is equivalent to a transaction
previously approved under an ITAR license or other approval. To
request that the U.S. Government review of a license application for
a ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' item also take into consideration
a previously approved ITAR license or other approval, applicants
must also include the State license number or other approval
identifier in Block 24 of the BIS license application (see the
instructions in Supplement No. 1 to part 748 under Block 24).
* * * * *
PART 758--[AMENDED]
0
17. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 758 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
18. Section 758.1 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(3) to read as
follows:
[[Page 31440]]
Sec. 758.1 The Automated Export System (AES) record.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) For all exports of ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' items
enumerated in paragraphs .a through .x of a ``500 series'' or ``600
series'' ECCN regardless of value or destination, including exports to
Canada;
* * * * *
0
19. Section 758.2, as amended April 16, 2013, at 78 FR 22726, is
further amended by revising paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 758.2 Automated Export System (AES).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Exports are made under License Exception Strategic Trade
Authorization (STA); are made under Authorization Validated End User
(VEU); or are of ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' items.
* * * * *
0
20. Section 758.6, as amended April 16, 2013, at 78 FR 22726, is
further amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 758.6 Destination control statement and other information
furnished to consignees.
* * * * *
(b) Additional Requirement for ``500 series'' and ``600 series''
items. In addition to the DCS as required in paragraph (a) of this
section, the ECCN for each ``500 series'' or ``600 series'' item being
exported must be printed on the invoice and on the bill of lading, air
waybill, or other export control document that accompanies the shipment
from its point of origin in the United States to the ultimate consignee
or end user abroad.
0
21. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 772 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
22. Section 772.1 is amended by adding, in alphanumerical order, a
definition for the term ``500 series'' and revising the definition for
the term ``space-qualified'' as set forth below:
Sec. 772.1 Definitions of terms as used in the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR).
* * * * *
500 series. ECCNs in the ``xY5zz'' format on the Commerce Control
List (CCL) that control ``dual use'' ``spacecraft'' and related items
on the CCL that were previously controlled on the United States
Munitions List. The ``5'' indicates the entry is a ``spacecraft'' entry
on the CCL. The ``x'' represents the CCL category and ``Y'' the CCL
product group. The ``500 series'' constitutes the ``spacecraft'' ECCNs
within the larger CCL. The ``500 series'' does not include items
designated in ECCNs 0A521, 0B521, 0C521, 0D521, or 0E521.
* * * * *
``Space-qualified''. (Cat 3, 6, and 9) Designed, manufactured, or
qualified through successful testing, for operation at altitudes
greater than 100 km above the surface of the Earth.
Note: A determination that a specific item is ``space
qualified'' by virtue of testing does not mean that other items in
the same production run or model series are ``space qualified'' if
not individually tested.
Note: The terms `designed' and `manufactured' in this definition
are synonymous with ``specially designed.'' Thus, for example, an
item that is ``specially designed'' for a spacecraft is deemed to be
`designed' or `manufactured' for operation at altitudes greater than
100 km and an item that is not ``specially designed'' for a
spacecraft is not deemed to have been so `designed' or
`manufactured.'
* * * * *
PART 774--[AMENDED]
0
23. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 774 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
24. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 3, revise the MT
paragraph of the License Requirements section and the Related Controls
paragraphs (1) and (2) and add a new sentence to the beginning of the
Related Definitions paragraph of Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) 3A001 to read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774--The Commerce Control List
* * * * *
3A001 Electronic ``components'' and ``specially designed'' ``parts''
and ``components'' therefor, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
License Requirements
* * * * *
MT applies to 3A001.a.1.a for MT Column 1
`microcircuits' ``usable in''
``missiles'' for protecting ``missiles''
against nuclear effects (e.g.
Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP), X-rays,
combined blast and thermal effects) and
to 3A001.a.5.a when ``designed or
modified'' for military use,
hermetically sealed and rated for
operation in the temperature range from
below -54 [deg]C to above +125 [deg]C.
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: (1) See Category XV of the USML for certain
``space qualified'' electronics ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR
parts 120 through 130). (2) See also 3A101, 3A201, 3A991, and 9A515.
* * *
* * * * *
Related Definitions: `Microcircuit' means a device in which a number
of passive or active elements are considered as indivisibly
associated on or within a continuous structure to perform the
function of a circuit. * * *
0
25. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 3, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 3A002
to read as follows:
3A002 General purpose electronic ``equipment'' and ``accessories''
therefor, as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See Category XV(e)(9) of the USML for certain
``space qualified'' atomic frequency standards ``subject to the
ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130). See also 3A292 and 3A992.
* * * * *
0
26. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 3, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 3D001
to read as follows:
3D001 ``Software'' ``specially designed'' for the ``development'' or
``production'' of ``equipment'' controlled by 3A001.b to 3A002.g or
3B (except 3B991 and 3B992).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: ``Software'' ``specially designed'' for the
``development'' or ``production'' of certain ``space qualified''
atomic frequency standards described in Category XV(e)(9) of the
USML is ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130).
See also 3D101.
* * * * *
0
27. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 3, revise the License
Exception TSR and Related Controls paragraphs of
[[Page 31441]]
Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 3E001 to read as follows:
3E001 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for
the ``development'' or ``production'' of ``equipment'' or
``materials'' controlled by 3A (except 3A292, 3A980, 3A981, 3A991,
3A992, or 3A999), 3B (except 3B991 or 3B992) or 3C (except 3C992).
* * * * *
License Exceptions
* * * * *
TSR: Yes, except N/A for MT, and ``technology'' specially designed
for the ``development'' or ``production'' of: (a) Traveling Wave
Tube Amplifiers described in 3A001.b.8, having operating frequencies
exceeding 19 GHz; and (b) solar cells, coverglass-interconnect-cells
or covered-interconnect-cells (CIC) ``assemblies,'' solar arrays
and/or solar panels described in 3A001.e.4.
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: ``Technology'' according to the General Technology
Note for the ``development'' or ``production'' of certain ``space
qualified'' atomic frequency standards described in Category
XV(e)(9) of the USML is ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts
120 through 130). See also 3E101 and 3E201.
* * * * *
0
28. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 3, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 3E003
to read as follows:
3E003 Other ``technology'' for the ``development'' or ``production''
of the following (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See 3E001 for the ``development'' or
``production'' related to radiation hardening of integrated
circuits, including silicon-on-insulation (SOI) ``technology.''
* * * * *
0
29. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 5, revise the Related
Controls paragraph and remove the second note to Items paragraph (a.3)
of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 5A001 to read as
follows:
5A001 Telecommunications ``systems,'' ``equipment,'' ``parts,''
``components'' and ``accessories,'' as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: (1) See USML Category XI for direction finding
``equipment'' defined in 5A001.e that are ``subject to the ITAR''
(see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130). (2) See also 5A101 and 5A991.
* * * * *
0
30. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 5, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 5A991
to read as follows:
5A991 Telecommunication ``equipment,'' not controlled by 5A001 (see
List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See also 5E101, 5E980 and 5E991.
* * * * *
0
31. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 5, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number 5E001 (ECCN)
to read as follows:
5E001 ``Technology'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See also 5E101, 5E980, and 5E991.
* * * * *
0
32. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 6, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 6A002
to read as follows:
6A002 Optical sensors and ``equipment,'' ``parts'' and
``components'' therefor, as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: (1) See USML Categories XII and XV for controls on
``image intensifiers'' defined in 6A002.a.2 and ``focal plane
arrays'' defined in 6A002.a.3 that are ``subject to the ITAR'' (see
22 CFR parts 120 through 130). (2) See also 6A102, 6A202, and 6A992.
* * * * *
0
33. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 6, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 6A004
to read as follows:
6A004 Optical ``equipment,'' ``parts'' and ``components,'' as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: (1) For optical mirrors or `aspheric optical
elements' ``specially designed'' for lithography ``equipment,'' see
ECCN 3B001. (2) See also 6A994.
* * * * *
0
34. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 6, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 6D001
to read as follows:
6D001 ``Software'' ``specially designed'' for the ``development'' or
``production'' of ``equipment'' controlled by 6A004, 6A005, 6A008 or
6B008.
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See also 6D991, and ECCN 6E001 (``development'')
for ``technology'' for items controlled under this entry.
* * * * *
0
35. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 6, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 6D002
to read as follows:
6D002 ``Software'' ``specially designed'' for the ``use'' of
``equipment'' controlled by 6A002.b, 6A008 or 6B008.
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: ``Software'' ``specially designed'' for the
``use'' of ``space qualified'' LIDAR ``equipment'' ``specially
designed'' for surveying or for meteorological observation, released
from control under the note in 6A008.j, is controlled in 6D991. See
also 6D102, 6D991, and 6D992.
* * * * *
0
36. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 6, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 6E001
to read as follows:
6E001 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for
the ``development'' of ``equipment,'' ``materials'' or ``software''
controlled by 6A (except 6A991, 6A992, 6A994, 6A995, 6A996, 6A997,
or 6A998), 6B (except 6B995), 6C (except 6C992 or 6C994), or 6D
(except 6D991, 6D992, or 6D993).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See also 6E101, 6E201, and 6E991.
* * * * *
0
37. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 6, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 6E002
to read as follows:
6E002 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for
the ``production'' of ``equipment'' or ``materials'' controlled by
6A (except 6A991, 6A992, 6A994, 6A995, 6A996, 6A997 or 6A998), 6B
(except 6B995) or 6C (except 6C992 or 6C994).
* * * * *
[[Page 31442]]
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See also 6E992.
* * * * *
0
38. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 7, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 7A004
to read as follows:
7A004 `Star trackers' and components therefor, as follows (see List
of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: 1) See USML Category XV for certain `Star
trackers' that are ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts 120
through 130).
* * * * *
0
39. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 7, revise the Related
Controls paragraph of Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 7A104
to read as follows:
7A104 Gyro-astro compasses and other devices, other than those
controlled by 7A004, which derive position or orientation by means
of automatically tracking celestial bodies or satellites and
specially designed components therefor.
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: (1) See USML Categories IV and XV for certain
`Star trackers' that are ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts
120 through 130). (2). * * *
* * * * *
0
40. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 9, revise the Related
Controls paragraphs (1) and (3) through (5), and remove items paragraph
(b) from the Items paragraph in the List of Items Controlled of Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN) 9A004 to read as follows:
9A004 Space launch vehicles and ``spacecraft''.
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls:
(1) See also 9A104, 9A515, and 9B515.
(2) * * *
(3) Spacecraft, launch vehicles and related articles that are
enumerated in the USML are ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts
120 through 130).
(4) All other ``spacecraft'' and related commodities not
controlled under 9A004 or enumerated in the USML are controlled
under ECCN 9A515 and 9B515.
(5) Technical data required for the detailed design,
development, manufacturing, or production of the international space
station remains ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts 120
through 130). All technical data and all defense services, including
all technical assistance, for launch of the international space
station, including launch vehicle compatibility, integration, or
processing data, are ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts 120
through 130).
* * * * *
0
41. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, between the entries for ECCNs
9A120 and 9A980, add new entry for ECCN 9A515 to read as follows:
9A515 ``Spacecraft'' and related commodities, as follows (see List
of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, MT, RS, AT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control(s) Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS applies to entire entry............... NS Column 1
RS applies to entire entry............... RS Column 1
MT applies to 9A515.d when ``usable in'' MT Column 1
``missiles'' for protecting ``missiles''
against nuclear effects (e.g.
Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP), X-rays,
combined blast and thermal effects).
AT applies to entire entry............... AT Column 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
License Exceptions
LVS: $1500
GBS: N/A
CIV: N/A
STA: Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception STA (Sec. 740.20(c)(2)
of the EAR) may not be used for any item in 9A515.
List of Items Controlled
Unit: End items in number; ``parts,'' ``components,''
``accessories,'' and ``attachments'' in $ value
Related Controls: Spacecraft, launch vehicles and related articles
that are enumerated in the USML, and technical data (including
``software'') directly related thereto, launch services, and launch
failure analysis for items in 9A515.a, are ``subject to the ITAR.''
A license is required under the ITAR for a ``U.S. person'' to
provide ``defense services'' to a foreign person for a
``spacecraft'' to be launched from outside the United States, even
if that ``spacecraft'' may be exported under License Exception STA.
See 22 CFR 120.9. All other ``spacecraft,'' as enumerated below and
defined in section 772.1, are subject to the controls of this ECCN.
See also ECCNs 3A001, 3A002, 3A991, 3A992, 6A002, 6A004, 6A008, and
6A998 for specific ``space-qualified'' items and 9A004 for the
International Space Station.
Related Definitions: N/A.
Items:
a. ``Spacecraft,'' including satellites, manned or unmanned
space vehicles, whether designated developmental, experimental,
research or scientific, not enumerated in USML Category XV.
Note: ECCN 9A515.a includes commercial communications
satellites, remote sensing satellites not identified in USML
Category XV, planetary rovers, and planetary and interplanetary
probes.
b. Ground control systems and training simulators ``specially
designed'' for telemetry, tracking, and control of the
``spacecraft'' in paragraph 9A515.a.
c. [Reserved]
d. Microelectronic circuits rated, certified, or otherwise
specified or described as meeting or exceeding all the following
characteristics and that are ``specially designed'' for defense
articles, ``600 series'' items, or items controlled by 9A515:
(1) A total dose of 5 x 10\5\ Rads (Si) (5 x 10\3\ Gy (Si));
(2) A dose rate upset threshold of 5 x 10\8\ Rads (Si)/sec (5 x
10\6\ Gy (Si)/sec);
(3) A neutron dose of 1 x 10\14\ n/cm\2\ (1 MeV equivalent);
(4) An uncorrected single event upset sensitivity of 1 x
10-\10\ errors/bit/day or less, for the CR[Egrave]ME-MC
geosynchronous orbit, Solar Minimum Environment for heavy ion flux;
and
(5) An uncorrected single event upset sensitivity of 1 x
10-\3\ errors/part or less for a fluence of 1 x 10\7\
protons/cm\2\ for proton energy greater than 50 MeV.
Note 1: Application specific integrated circuits (ASICs)
``specially designed'' for defense articles are controlled by
Category XI(c) of the USML regardless of characteristics.
Note 2: See 9A515.x for controls on ``space qualified''
microelectronic circuits that are not rated certified, or otherwise
specified or described as meeting or exceeding the characteristics
in paragraph .d.
Note 3: See 3A001.a for controls radiation-hardened
microelectronic circuits ``subject to the EAR'' that are not
controlled by 9A515.d or 9A515.x.
Note 4: Microelectronic circuits that are ``specially designed''
for defense articles on the USML or for ``600 series'' items are
controlled under 3A611.x.
e. through w. [Reserved]
x. ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories'' and
``attachments'' that are ``space qualified'' and not enumerated or
controlled in the USML, elsewhere within ECCN 9A515, or an ECCN
containing ``space-qualified'' as a control criterion, i.e.,
3A001.b.1, 3A001.e.4, 3A002.a.3, 3A002.g.1, 3A991.o, 3A992.b.3,
6A002.a.1, 6A002.b.2, 6A002.d.1, 6A002.e, 6A004.c and .d, 6A008.j.1,
or 6A998.b.
Note 1: ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' and
``attachments'' specified in USML subcategory XV(e) or enumerated in
other USML categories are subject to the controls of that paragraph
or category.
0
42. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, between the entries for ECCNs
9B117 and 9B990, add new entry for ECCN 9B515 to read as follows:
9B515 Test, inspection, and production ``equipment'' ``specially
designed'' for ``spacecraft'' and related commodities, as follows
(see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, RS, AT
[[Page 31443]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control(s) Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS applies to entire entry............... NS Column 1
RS applies to entire entry............... RS Column 1
AT applies to entire entry............... AT Column 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
License Exceptions
LVS: $1500; $5000 for 9B515.c.
GBS: N/A.
CIV: N/A.
STA: Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception STA (Sec. 740.20(c)(2)
of the EAR) may not be used for any item in 9B515.
List of Items Controlled
Unit: N/A.
Related Controls: N/A.
Related Definitions: N/A.
Items:
a. Test, inspection, and production ``equipment'' ``specially
designed'' for the ``production'' or ``development'' of commodities
enumerated in ECCN 9A515 or USML Category XV.
b. ``Equipment,'' cells, and stands ``specially designed'' for
testing, analysis and fault isolation of commodities enumerated in
ECCN 9A515, 9A004 or USML Category XV.
c. Environmental test chambers capable of pressures below
(10-4) Torr, and ``specially designed'' ``components''
therefor.
0
43. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, between the entries for ECCNs
9D105 and 9D990, add a new entry for ECCN 9D515 to read as follows:
9D515 ``Software'' ``specially designed'' for the ``development,''
``production'' operation, installation, maintenance, repair,
overhaul, or refurbishing of ``spacecraft'' and related commodities,
as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, RS, AT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control(s) Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS applies to entire entry............... NS Column 1
RS applies to entire entry............... RS Column 1
AT applies to entire entry............... AT Column 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
License Exceptions
CIV: N/A.
TSR: N/A.
STA: (1) Paragraph (c)(1) of License Exception STA (Sec.
740.20(c)(1) of the EAR) may not be used for 9D515.b through .g. (2)
Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception STA (Sec. 740.20(c)(2) of the
EAR) may not be used for any ``software'' in 9D515.
List of Items Controlled
Unit: $ value.
Related Controls: ``Software'' directly related to articles
enumerated in USML Category XV is subject to the control of USML
paragraph XV(f). See also ECCNs 3D001, 6D001, 6D002, and 6D991 for
controls of specific software ``specially designed'' for certain
``space qualified'' items.
Related Definitions: N/A.
Items:
a. ``Software'' (other than ``software'' controlled in
paragraphs .b through .g of this entry) ``specially designed'' for
the ``development,'' ``production,'' operation, installation,
maintenance, repair, overhaul, or refurbishing of commodities
controlled by ECCN 9A515 or ``equipment'' controlled by 9B515.
b. ``Source code'' that contains the algorithms or control
principles (e.g., clock management), precise orbit determination
(e.g., ephemeris, pseudo range), signal construct (e.g., pseudo-
random noise (PRN) anti-spoofing) ``specially designed'' for items
controlled by ECCN 9A515.
c. ``Source code'' ``specially designed'' for the integration,
operation, or control (i.e., use) of items controlled by ECCN 9A515.
d. ``Source code'' that contains algorithms or modules
``specially designed'' for system, subsystem, component, part, or
accessory calibration, manipulation, or control of items controlled
by ECCN 9A515.
e. ``Source code'' ``specially designed'' for data assemblage,
extrapolation, or manipulation of items controlled by ECCN 9A515.
f. ``Source code'' that contains the algorithms or control laws
``specially designed'' for attitude, position, or flight control of
items controlled in ECCN 9A515.
g. ``Source code'' ``specially designed'' for built-in test and
diagnostics for items controlled by ECCN 9A515.
0
44. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, between the entries for ECCNs
9E102 and 9E990, add new entry for ECCN 9E515 to read as follows:
9E515 ``Technology'' ``required'' for the ``development,''
``production,'' operation, installation, maintenance, repair,
overhaul, or refurbishing of ``spacecraft'' and related commodities,
as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, MT, RS, AT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control(s) Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS applies to entire entry............... NS Column 1
MT applies to technology for items in MT Column 1
9A515.d controlled for MT reasons.
RS applies to entire entry............... RS Column 1
AT applies to entire entry............... AT Column 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
License Exceptions
CIV: N/A.
TSR: N/A.
STA: (1) Paragraph (c)(1) of License Exception STA (Sec.
740.20(c)(1) of the EAR) may not be used for 9E515.b. (2) Paragraph
(c)(2) of License Exception STA (Sec. 740.20(c)(2) of the EAR) may
not be used for any ``technology'' in 9E515.
List of Items Controlled
Unit: $ value.
Related Controls: Technical data directly related to articles
enumerated in USML Category XV are subject to the control of USML
paragraph XV(f). See also ECCNs 3E001, 3E003, 6E001, and 6E002 for
specific ``space-qualified'' items.
Related Definitions: N/A.
Items:
a. ``Technology'' ``required'' for the ``development,''
``production,'' operation, installation, maintenance, repair,
overhaul or refurbishing of commodities controlled by ECCN 9A515,
``equipment'' controlled by 9B515, or ``software'' controlled by
9D515.
Note: ``Build-to-print technology'' excluded from paragraph b.
is classified under 9E515.a.
b. ``Technology'' (other than ``build-to-print technology'')
``required'' for the ``development,'' ``production,'' design
verification, manufacturability, or quality control for items in
ECCN 9A515, except items in ECCN 9A515.b.
0
45. In Supplement No. 4 to Part 774, add three sentences to the
conclusion of paragraph (a)(3) and one sentence to the conclusion of
paragraph (a)(4) and revise the first sentence of paragraph (a)(5), to
read as follows:
Supplement No. 3 to Part 774--Commerce Control List Order of Review
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) Step 3. * * * The 9x515 ECCNs describe satellites, related
items, and some types of radiation-hardened microelectronic circuits
that were once subject to the ITAR under USML Category XV.
Similarly, the first step when determining the classification status
of such items that are no longer listed on USML Category XV is to
determine whether they are controlled in a 9x515 ECCN. If so, the
item is classified under that 9x515 ECCN paragraph. If not, then one
needs to review the rest of the CCL to determine whether the item is
within the scope of another ECCN.
(4) Step 4. * * * Similarly, if a satellite, related item, or
radiation-hardened microelectric circuit are not described in 9A515,
then review 9A515.x to determine if it is controlled there as a
result of being ``space qualified.''
* * * * *
(5) Step 5. If an item is not classified by a ``600 series'' or
``500 series'' ECCN, then starting from the beginning of the product
group analyze each ECCN to determine whether any other ECCN in that
product group describes the item. * * *
* * * * *
Dated: May 14, 2013.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-11986 Filed 5-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P