Avocados Grown in South Florida; Change in Minimum Grade Requirements, 30782-30784 [2013-12239]
Download as PDF
30782
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 100
Thursday, May 23, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–12–0067; FV13–915–1
PR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida;
Change in Minimum Grade
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites
comments on an increase to the
minimum grade requirements currently
prescribed under the Florida avocado
marketing order (order). The order
regulates the handling of avocados
grown in South Florida, and is
administered locally by the Avocado
Administrative Committee (Committee).
This action would increase the current
minimum grade requirement from a U.S.
No. 2 to a U.S. Combination grade for
avocados shipped to destinations
outside the production area. Increasing
the minimum grade requirement would
align marketing order regulations with
current industry practices to the benefit
of growers, handlers, and consumers.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 24, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 May 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Jamieson, Marketing Specialist or
Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director,
Southeast Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 325–7893, or Email:
Doris.Jamieson@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 915, as amended (7 CFR part
915), regulating the handling of
avocados grown in South Florida,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on
revisions to the minimum grade
requirements currently prescribed under
the order. This proposal would increase
the current minimum grade requirement
from a U.S. No. 2 to a U.S. Combination
grade for avocados shipped to
destinations outside the production area
and was recommended by the
Committee at a meeting on October 10,
2012.
Section 915.51 of the order provides,
in part, authority to issue regulations
establishing specific grade requirements
for avocados. Section 915.52 of the
order provides authority for the
modification, suspension or termination
of established regulations.
Section 915.306 of the order’s
container and pack regulations prescribe
grade, pack, and container marking
requirements for Florida avocados.
Paragraph (a)(1) of that section
prescribes, in part, that no handler shall
handle any variety of avocados grown in
the production area unless such
avocados grade at least U.S. No. 2.
While marketing order regulations
specify a minimum grade requirement
of a U.S. No. 2, it is standard industry
practice to ship avocados to destinations
outside the production area at the
higher grade of a U.S. Combination,
especially at the beginning of the
season. The minimum requirement for a
U.S. Combination grade provides that at
least 60 percent of the fruit in the pack
must meet the U.S. No. 1 grade and the
remaining fruit must meet at least a U.S.
No. 2 grade. Handlers have voluntarily
shipped the higher grade fruit in order
to get the best price for growers and to
provide quality fruit to consumers.
During the first four months of the
2012–13 season, shipments of U.S. No.
2 grade fruit were 13 percent higher
than shipments during the comparable
period of the previous season. Buyers
were reluctant to pay a higher price for
the better grade fruit when they could
purchase the lower grade fruit for less.
This negatively affected the price of the
U.S. Combination grade fruit and
resulted in the loss of sales of the higher
grade fruit.
During several meetings, Committee
members expressed concern that
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
shipments of the U.S. No. 2 grade fruit
may continue to increase and further
impact price. Further, the Florida
avocado industry has established a
reputation for providing consumers
with high quality fruit and the
Committee believes shipping U.S. No. 2
grade fruit outside the production area
could lower that standard.
As the majority of handlers are
currently shipping at the higher grade,
it is not anticipated that this change
would reduce overall shipments. Even
though there was an increase in
shipments of U.S. No. 2 grade fruit to
destinations outside the production area
during the 2012–13 season, Committee
data indicates total shipments of U.S.
No. 2 grade fruit represented only about
one percent of total shipments this
season, which were over 1.1 million 55pound bushel containers.
Consequently, the Committee
recommended increasing the minimum
grade requirement to a U.S.
Combination for avocados shipped to
destinations outside the production
area. Fruit shipped within the
production area would continue to be
required to meet the current minimum
grade of a U.S. No. 2, which would
provide an outlet for U.S. No. 2 grade
not utilized in the U.S. Combination
pack. This proposal would align
marketing order regulations with
current industry practices to the benefit
of growers, handlers, and consumers.
This proposal would help maintain the
industry’s reputation for providing
consumers with high quality avocados
from Florida, while continuing to
provide handlers with an outlet for their
U.S. No. 2 fruit.
One member of the Committee voted
against the recommendation. He stated
the minimum grade requirement should
be increased, but only during the
beginning of the season when domestic
production was minimal. He believed
that when imports begin arriving in
October, the minimum grade should
revert back to a U.S. No. 2 in order for
the Florida avocado industry to compete
with imported fruit. However, the
majority of the Committee agreed the
quality of the fruit was the most
important issue and shipping the lower
grade fruit lowered that high standard
established by the Florida avocado
industry. Other members of the
Committee also commented that they
believe increasing the minimum grade
for Florida avocados would cause
imported fruit quality to improve in
order to match the higher quality
standard set by the Florida avocado
industry.
Section 8e of the Act provides that
when certain domestically produced
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 May 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
commodities, including avocados, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of that commodity must
meet the same or comparable grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements.
The changes proposed in this rule
would apply only to shipments outside
the production area. The current, less
restrictive regulations would continue
to apply to shipments within the
production area and to imported
avocadoes. A clarification will be made
to the import regulation in a separate
action.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 30 handlers
of Florida avocados subject to regulation
under the order and approximately 300
producers of avocados in the production
area. Small agricultural service firms,
which include avocado handlers, are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those whose
annual receipts are less than $7,000,000,
and small agricultural producers are
defined as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to Committee data and
information from the National
Agricultural Statistical Service, the
average price for Florida avocados
during the 2011–12 season was
approximately $20.79 per 55-pound
bushel container and total shipments
were slightly higher than 1.2 million 55pound bushels. Using the average price
and shipment information provided by
the Committee, the majority of avocado
handlers could be considered small
businesses under SBA’s definition. In
addition, based on avocado production,
producer prices, and the total number of
Florida avocado producers, the average
annual producer revenue is less than
$750,000. Consequently, the majority of
avocado handlers and producers may be
classified as small entities.
This proposal would increase the
minimum grade requirements currently
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30783
prescribed for Florida avocados under
§ 915.306 of the order. This proposed
change would increase the minimum
grade from a U.S. No. 2 to a U.S.
Combination grade for avocados
shipped to destinations outside the
production area and would align
marketing order regulations to current
industry practices. This proposal was
recommended by the Committee at a
meeting on October 10, 2012. Authority
for this action is provided in §§ 915.51
and 915.52 of the order.
Any additional costs that would be
associated with this change are
anticipated to be minimal. The order
does require that all containers be
marked with the grade of fruit in the
container. However, the vast majority of
handlers are currently shipping at the
higher grade requirement, and marking
their containers accordingly. Further,
any containers pre-stamped with a U.S.
No. 2 that a handler may already have
could be used in the production area.
As previously stated, the volume of
U.S. No. 2 grade Florida avocados
shipped during a season represents less
than one percent of total annual
shipments. In addition, the U.S.
Combination grade requires that at least
60 percent of the fruit in the pack be a
U.S. No. 1 grade and the remaining fruit
must meet a U.S. No. 2 grade.
Consequently, U.S. No. 2 fruit can be
utilized in the U.S. Combination pack.
Further, if this rule is implemented,
U.S. No. 2 grade avocados could still be
shipped to destinations within the
production area. Therefore,
implementation of this proposed rule is
not expected to impact the overall
volume of U.S. No. 2 fruit being utilized
as adequate uses for such fruit would
continue to exist.
Increasing the minimum grade
requirement would align marketing
order requirements with current
industry practices. Consumers would
benefit as a result of the higher quality
pack available in the marketplace. It
would also build consumer confidence
and improve grower returns. The
benefits of this proposed rule are not
expected to be disproportionately
greater or less for small handlers or
growers than for large entities.
The Committee considered
alternatives to this recommended
change. The Committee discussed
increasing the minimum grade to U.S.
Combination grade during the early part
of the season and then reverting back to
the minimum grade requirement of a
U.S. No. 2 in October when imported
fruit typically begins arriving in the U.S.
There was concern that having the
higher grade requirements in effect
when imports begin arriving would
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
30784
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
make it difficult for the domestic
industry to compete. However, the
Committee agreed the quality of the fruit
was the most important issue and
shipping the lower grade fruit lowered
that high standard established by the
Florida avocado industry. Also,
Committee members stated that they
believe increasing the minimum grade
for Florida avocados shipped outside
the production area for the entire season
would result in improved quality of
both domestic and imported avocados,
as imports would likely strive to match
the quality standards set by the Florida
avocado industry. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected.
The Committee also considered
changing the minimum grade
requirements for all Florida avocados
handled, regardless of market
destination. However, maintaining the
current minimum grade requirement for
avocados shipped to destinations within
the production area provides an outlet
for U.S. No. 2 grade fruit not utilized in
the higher grade packs. Therefore, the
Committee also rejected this alternative.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Generic
Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would increase
the minimum grade requirement under
the Florida avocado marketing order.
Accordingly, this action would not
impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large Florida avocado handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this proposed rule.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Florida avocado industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 May 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Like all Committee meetings, the
October 10, 2012, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on
this issue. Finally, interested persons
are invited to submit comments on this
proposed rule, including the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed
appropriate so this change would be in
place by May when handlers begin
shipping. This would also give handlers
advanced notice of the increased grade
requirement before the season begins.
All written comments timely received
will be considered before a final
determination is made on this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 915 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 915—AVOCADOS GROWN IN
SOUTH FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 915 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 915.306, paragraph (a)(1) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 915.306 Florida avocado grade, pack and
container marking regulation.
(a) * * *
(1) Such avocados grade at least U.S.
Combination, except that avocadoes
handled to destinations within the
production area grade U.S. No. 2 and
except further that such avocados may
be placed in containers with avocados
of dissimilar varietal characteristics.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 17, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–12239 Filed 5–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
12 CFR Parts 1267, 1269, and 1270
RIN 2590–AA40
Removal of References to Credit
Ratings in Certain Regulations
Governing the Federal Home Loan
Banks
Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Section 939A of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act)
requires Federal agencies to review
regulations that require the use of an
assessment of the credit-worthiness of a
security or money market instrument
and any references to, or requirements
in, such regulations regarding credit
ratings issued by credit rating
organizations registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) as nationally recognized statistical
rating organizations (NRSROs), and to
remove such references or requirements.
To implement this provision, the
Federal Housing Finance Agency
(FHFA) is proposing to remove a
number of references and requirements
in certain safety and soundness
regulations affecting the Federal Home
Loan Banks (Banks) and to adopt new
provisions that would require the Banks
to apply internal analytic standards and
criteria to determine the credit quality
of a security or obligation, subject to
FHFA oversight and review through the
examination and supervisory process.
FHFA will undertake separate
rulemakings to remove NRSRO
references and requirements contained
in the capital regulations applicable to
the Banks and in the regulations
governing the Banks’ acquired member
asset (AMA) programs.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received on or before July 22,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments on the proposed rule,
identified by regulatory information
number (RIN) 2590–AA40 by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If
you submit your comments to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also
send it by email to FHFA at
RegComments@FHFA.gov to ensure
timely receipt by the agency. Please
include ‘‘RIN 2590–AA40’’ in the
subject line of the message.
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 100 (Thursday, May 23, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30782-30784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12239]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 30782]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-12-0067; FV13-915-1 PR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida; Change in Minimum Grade
Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on an increase to the
minimum grade requirements currently prescribed under the Florida
avocado marketing order (order). The order regulates the handling of
avocados grown in South Florida, and is administered locally by the
Avocado Administrative Committee (Committee). This action would
increase the current minimum grade requirement from a U.S. No. 2 to a
U.S. Combination grade for avocados shipped to destinations outside the
production area. Increasing the minimum grade requirement would align
marketing order regulations with current industry practices to the
benefit of growers, handlers, and consumers.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 24, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
proposal will be included in the record and will be made available to
the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting comments will be made public on the Internet at the
address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Jamieson, Marketing Specialist
or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax: (863) 325-7893, or
Email: Doris.Jamieson@ams.usda.gov or Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 915, as amended (7 CFR part 915), regulating the handling of
avocados grown in South Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on revisions to the minimum grade
requirements currently prescribed under the order. This proposal would
increase the current minimum grade requirement from a U.S. No. 2 to a
U.S. Combination grade for avocados shipped to destinations outside the
production area and was recommended by the Committee at a meeting on
October 10, 2012.
Section 915.51 of the order provides, in part, authority to issue
regulations establishing specific grade requirements for avocados.
Section 915.52 of the order provides authority for the modification,
suspension or termination of established regulations.
Section 915.306 of the order's container and pack regulations
prescribe grade, pack, and container marking requirements for Florida
avocados. Paragraph (a)(1) of that section prescribes, in part, that no
handler shall handle any variety of avocados grown in the production
area unless such avocados grade at least U.S. No. 2.
While marketing order regulations specify a minimum grade
requirement of a U.S. No. 2, it is standard industry practice to ship
avocados to destinations outside the production area at the higher
grade of a U.S. Combination, especially at the beginning of the season.
The minimum requirement for a U.S. Combination grade provides that at
least 60 percent of the fruit in the pack must meet the U.S. No. 1
grade and the remaining fruit must meet at least a U.S. No. 2 grade.
Handlers have voluntarily shipped the higher grade fruit in order to
get the best price for growers and to provide quality fruit to
consumers.
During the first four months of the 2012-13 season, shipments of
U.S. No. 2 grade fruit were 13 percent higher than shipments during the
comparable period of the previous season. Buyers were reluctant to pay
a higher price for the better grade fruit when they could purchase the
lower grade fruit for less. This negatively affected the price of the
U.S. Combination grade fruit and resulted in the loss of sales of the
higher grade fruit.
During several meetings, Committee members expressed concern that
[[Page 30783]]
shipments of the U.S. No. 2 grade fruit may continue to increase and
further impact price. Further, the Florida avocado industry has
established a reputation for providing consumers with high quality
fruit and the Committee believes shipping U.S. No. 2 grade fruit
outside the production area could lower that standard.
As the majority of handlers are currently shipping at the higher
grade, it is not anticipated that this change would reduce overall
shipments. Even though there was an increase in shipments of U.S. No. 2
grade fruit to destinations outside the production area during the
2012-13 season, Committee data indicates total shipments of U.S. No. 2
grade fruit represented only about one percent of total shipments this
season, which were over 1.1 million 55-pound bushel containers.
Consequently, the Committee recommended increasing the minimum
grade requirement to a U.S. Combination for avocados shipped to
destinations outside the production area. Fruit shipped within the
production area would continue to be required to meet the current
minimum grade of a U.S. No. 2, which would provide an outlet for U.S.
No. 2 grade not utilized in the U.S. Combination pack. This proposal
would align marketing order regulations with current industry practices
to the benefit of growers, handlers, and consumers. This proposal would
help maintain the industry's reputation for providing consumers with
high quality avocados from Florida, while continuing to provide
handlers with an outlet for their U.S. No. 2 fruit.
One member of the Committee voted against the recommendation. He
stated the minimum grade requirement should be increased, but only
during the beginning of the season when domestic production was
minimal. He believed that when imports begin arriving in October, the
minimum grade should revert back to a U.S. No. 2 in order for the
Florida avocado industry to compete with imported fruit. However, the
majority of the Committee agreed the quality of the fruit was the most
important issue and shipping the lower grade fruit lowered that high
standard established by the Florida avocado industry. Other members of
the Committee also commented that they believe increasing the minimum
grade for Florida avocados would cause imported fruit quality to
improve in order to match the higher quality standard set by the
Florida avocado industry.
Section 8e of the Act provides that when certain domestically
produced commodities, including avocados, are regulated under a Federal
marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements. The changes
proposed in this rule would apply only to shipments outside the
production area. The current, less restrictive regulations would
continue to apply to shipments within the production area and to
imported avocadoes. A clarification will be made to the import
regulation in a separate action.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 30 handlers of Florida avocados subject to
regulation under the order and approximately 300 producers of avocados
in the production area. Small agricultural service firms, which include
avocado handlers, are defined by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000, and
small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual
receipts less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to Committee data and information from the National
Agricultural Statistical Service, the average price for Florida
avocados during the 2011-12 season was approximately $20.79 per 55-
pound bushel container and total shipments were slightly higher than
1.2 million 55-pound bushels. Using the average price and shipment
information provided by the Committee, the majority of avocado handlers
could be considered small businesses under SBA's definition. In
addition, based on avocado production, producer prices, and the total
number of Florida avocado producers, the average annual producer
revenue is less than $750,000. Consequently, the majority of avocado
handlers and producers may be classified as small entities.
This proposal would increase the minimum grade requirements
currently prescribed for Florida avocados under Sec. 915.306 of the
order. This proposed change would increase the minimum grade from a
U.S. No. 2 to a U.S. Combination grade for avocados shipped to
destinations outside the production area and would align marketing
order regulations to current industry practices. This proposal was
recommended by the Committee at a meeting on October 10, 2012.
Authority for this action is provided in Sec. Sec. 915.51 and 915.52
of the order.
Any additional costs that would be associated with this change are
anticipated to be minimal. The order does require that all containers
be marked with the grade of fruit in the container. However, the vast
majority of handlers are currently shipping at the higher grade
requirement, and marking their containers accordingly. Further, any
containers pre-stamped with a U.S. No. 2 that a handler may already
have could be used in the production area.
As previously stated, the volume of U.S. No. 2 grade Florida
avocados shipped during a season represents less than one percent of
total annual shipments. In addition, the U.S. Combination grade
requires that at least 60 percent of the fruit in the pack be a U.S.
No. 1 grade and the remaining fruit must meet a U.S. No. 2 grade.
Consequently, U.S. No. 2 fruit can be utilized in the U.S. Combination
pack. Further, if this rule is implemented, U.S. No. 2 grade avocados
could still be shipped to destinations within the production area.
Therefore, implementation of this proposed rule is not expected to
impact the overall volume of U.S. No. 2 fruit being utilized as
adequate uses for such fruit would continue to exist.
Increasing the minimum grade requirement would align marketing
order requirements with current industry practices. Consumers would
benefit as a result of the higher quality pack available in the
marketplace. It would also build consumer confidence and improve grower
returns. The benefits of this proposed rule are not expected to be
disproportionately greater or less for small handlers or growers than
for large entities.
The Committee considered alternatives to this recommended change.
The Committee discussed increasing the minimum grade to U.S.
Combination grade during the early part of the season and then
reverting back to the minimum grade requirement of a U.S. No. 2 in
October when imported fruit typically begins arriving in the U.S. There
was concern that having the higher grade requirements in effect when
imports begin arriving would
[[Page 30784]]
make it difficult for the domestic industry to compete. However, the
Committee agreed the quality of the fruit was the most important issue
and shipping the lower grade fruit lowered that high standard
established by the Florida avocado industry. Also, Committee members
stated that they believe increasing the minimum grade for Florida
avocados shipped outside the production area for the entire season
would result in improved quality of both domestic and imported
avocados, as imports would likely strive to match the quality standards
set by the Florida avocado industry. Therefore, this alternative was
rejected.
The Committee also considered changing the minimum grade
requirements for all Florida avocados handled, regardless of market
destination. However, maintaining the current minimum grade requirement
for avocados shipped to destinations within the production area
provides an outlet for U.S. No. 2 grade fruit not utilized in the
higher grade packs. Therefore, the Committee also rejected this
alternative.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Generic Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would increase the minimum grade requirement
under the Florida avocado marketing order. Accordingly, this action
would not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Florida avocado handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed
to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and
public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the Florida avocado industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the October
10, 2012, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including
the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about
the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed appropriate so this
change would be in place by May when handlers begin shipping. This
would also give handlers advanced notice of the increased grade
requirement before the season begins. All written comments timely
received will be considered before a final determination is made on
this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 915 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 915--AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH FLORIDA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 915 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 915.306, paragraph (a)(1) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 915.306 Florida avocado grade, pack and container marking
regulation.
(a) * * *
(1) Such avocados grade at least U.S. Combination, except that
avocadoes handled to destinations within the production area grade U.S.
No. 2 and except further that such avocados may be placed in containers
with avocados of dissimilar varietal characteristics.
* * * * *
Dated: May 17, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-12239 Filed 5-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P