Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan Program, 30218-30226 [2013-12145]
Download as PDF
30218
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
2.0 ppm. The Agency revised this
tolerance level based on analysis of the
residue field trial data using the
Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD) tolerance
calculation procedures.
Finally, the Agency has revised the
tolerance expression to clarify: (1) That,
as provided in FFDCA section 408(a)(3),
the tolerance covers metabolites and
degradates of NAA not specifically
mentioned; and (2) that compliance
with the specified tolerance levels is to
be determined by measuring only the
specific compounds mentioned in the
tolerance expression.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of NAA, 1naphthaleneacetic acid, in or on
avocado at 0.05 ppm; fruit, pome, group
11–10 at 0.15 ppm; sapote, mamey at
0.05 ppm; mango at 0.05 ppm; and
rambutan at 2.0 ppm. This regulation
additionally removes the tolerance in or
on fruit, pome, group 11 at 0.15 ppm
and the time-limited tolerance in or on
avocado at 0.05 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: May 14, 2013.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.155 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.155 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid;
tolerances for residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for the residues of 1naphthaleneacetic acid, including its
metabolites and degradates in or on the
commodities in the following table.
Compliance with the tolerance levels
specified is to be determined by
measuring only 1-naphthaleneacetic
acid and its conjugates, calculated as the
Stoichiometric equivalent of 1naphthaleneacetic acid, in or on the
commodity.
Commodity
Parts per
million
Avocado ................................
Cherry, sweet .......................
Fruit, pome, group 11–10 .....
Mango ...................................
Olive ......................................
Orange ..................................
Pineapple1 ............................
Potato ...................................
Rambutan .............................
Sapote, mamey ....................
Tangerine ..............................
1 There
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.05
0.7
0.1
0.05
0.01
2.0
0.05
0.1
are no U.S. registrations since 1988.
(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions.
[Reserved]
(c) Tolerances with regional
registrations. [Reserved]
(d) Indirect or inadvertent residues.
[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2013–12207 Filed 5–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 152
[CMS–9995–IFC3]
RIN 0938–AQ70
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan
Program
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment
period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This interim final rule with
comment period sets the payment rates
for covered services furnished to
individuals enrolled in the Pre-Existing
Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP)
program administered directly by HHS
beginning with covered services
furnished on June 15, 2013. This interim
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
final rule also prohibits facilities and
providers who, with respect to dates of
service beginning on June 15, 2013,
accept payment for most covered
services furnished to an enrollee in the
federally-administered PCIP from
charging the enrollee an amount greater
than the enrollee’s out-of-pocket cost for
the covered service as calculated by the
plan. The PCIP program was established
under Section 1101 of Title I of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (Affordable Care Act).
DATES: Effective date: This interim final
regulation is effective on June 15, 2013.
Comment date: To be assured
consideration, written comments must
be received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
July 22, 2013. Because of staff and
resource limitations, we cannot accept
comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–9995–IFC3. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed).
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions under the ‘‘More Search
Options’’ tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–9995–IFC3, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address only: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–9995–IFC3,
Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to either of the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–
1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
4492 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://regulations.gov.
Follow the search instructions on that
Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will be
also available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Simpson, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, (410) 786–
0017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act, (Pub. L. 111–148) was enacted
on March 23, 2010; the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
(Reconciliation Act), (Pub. L. 111–152)
was enacted on March 30, 2010
(collectively, ‘‘Affordable Care Act’’).
Section 1101 of the Affordable Care Act
directs the Secretary of Health and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30219
Human Services (HHS) to establish,
either directly or through contracts with
states or nonprofit private entities, a
temporary high risk health insurance
pool program to provide access to
affordable health insurance coverage to
eligible uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions. A number of states
elected to contract with HHS to
establish and administer a high risk
pool using PCIP funds. HHS directly
established and administers a high risk
pool in the remaining states and the
District of Columbia. (Hereafter, we
generally refer to this program as the
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan
program, or the PCIP program. We refer
to the PCIP program administered by
HHS as the ‘‘federally-administered
PCIP’’ or the ‘‘Plan’’ and a PCIP program
administered by a state or its designated
entity as a ‘‘state-based PCIP.’’) The
PCIP program is intended to provide
health insurance coverage to eligible
uninsured individuals with pre-existing
conditions until 2014. Beginning in
2014, most health insurance issuers will
be required to offer coverage to all
individuals, regardless of pre-existing
conditions, pursuant to section 2704 of
the Public Health Service Act. Eligible
individuals will be able to obtain health
insurance coverage either by enrolling
in a qualified health plan offered
through the new Health Insurance
Exchanges (also called Marketplaces)
established under section 1311 or 1321
of the Affordable Care Act, or by
enrolling in health insurance coverage
offered in the individual or group
market outside of the Exchanges.
As a temporary bridge to the
provisions that go into effect beginning
in 2014, the PCIP program was designed
to provide coverage to eligible
individuals who have been locked out
of the insurance market due to their
health status. Since enrollment began in
July 2010, the PCIP program has
experienced significant and sustained
growth, enrolling more than 135,000
otherwise uninsured individuals with
pre-existing conditions. Many PCIP
enrollees have serious health conditions
that require immediate and ongoing
medical treatment including severe or
life threatening conditions such as
cancer. In 2012, the average annual
claims cost paid per enrollee was
$32,108. This cost per enrollee exceeds
even that of state high risk pools that
predate the Affordable Care Act for
several reasons. Like other high risk
pools, PCIP enrollees are limited to
people that were previously considered
uninsurable due to high expected claims
cost. In contrast to many state high risk
pools, PCIP enrollees also do not
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
30220
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
experience any waiting periods or preexisting condition exclusions upon
enrollment in the program.
The combined effect of the number of
individuals enrolled in the program,
particularly very sick individuals, their
high utilization of covered services, and
the statutory limitations on enrollee
cost-sharing (which limits the maximum
amount an enrollee pays out-of-pocket
for covered services to $6,250 in 2013)
has led to a situation where the overall
cost of the PCIP program is higher than
originally projected. While the actuarial
estimates that HHS relies on to manage
the program fluctuate as new claims
data is received and processed, given
the current enrollment projections and
the current rate of claims payment, the
aggregate amount needed for the
payment of the expenses of the PCIP
program is estimated to exceed the
amount of remaining funding
appropriated by Congress to pay for
such expenses until the statutory end to
the program in 2014, unless we
implement the policy changes being
announced in this interim final rule.
We have already taken measures to
contain costs, with the intent of
sustaining the program until 2014. In
May of 2012, the federally-administered
PCIP ceased paying referral fees to
agents and brokers in connection with
enrolled individuals they had referred
to the program and began requiring that
applications for enrollment include
documentation showing that the
individual had been denied health
insurance coverage due to the existence
of a pre-existing condition. On August
1, 2012, the federally-administered PCIP
switched provider networks, reducing
both its negotiated and out-of-network
payment rates to providers. This
network change was followed by a
targeted effort to negotiate additional
discounts from in-network inpatient
facilities that were treating a large
number of PCIP enrollees. Additionally
in 2012, the federally-administered PCIP
limited the specialty drug benefit such
that the plan would only cover specialty
drugs dispensed by in-network
pharmacies.
Beginning January 1, 2013, the
federally-administered PCIP
implemented additional cost
containment measures, including—(1)
The elimination of two of three former
plan options in favor of a single plan
option; (2) an increase in the maximum
out-of-pocket limit from $4,000 to
$6,250 for in-network services; and (3)
an increase in coinsurance, once the
deductible has been met, from 20
percent to 30 percent of the plan
allowance for in-network covered
services. Furthermore, on February 15,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
2013, the federally-administered PCIP
suspended its acceptance of new
enrollment applications until further
notice.
State-based PCIPs suspended their
acceptance of new enrollment
applications received after March 2,
2013. Additionally, a number of statebased PCIPs have taken measures to
constrain costs in their programs, for
example, by renegotiating their facility
and physician reimbursement rates or
by setting their payment rates at levels
similar to the rates paid by Medicare.
Lastly, in May 2013 HHS began
negotiations with state-based PCIPs on a
final program contract, with a period of
performance running from June 1, 2013
through December 31, 2013. The
contract HHS will offer to state-based
PCIPs will be a cost reimbursement
contract up to, but not exceeding, the
funding obligated in the contract.
Based on estimates, HHS believes it is
prudent and necessary to make
additional adjustments in the federallyadministered PCIP with respect to
payment rates for covered services in
order to ensure that there is sufficient
funding available to provide coverage to
currently enrolled individuals until the
program ends in 2014.
Furthermore, to protect enrollees in
the federally-administered PCIP from
having to shoulder potentially
significant costs that could be shifted to
them as a result of this new payment
policy, we are also adopting a policy
that prohibits any facility or provider
who, with respect to dates of service
beginning on June 15, 2013, accepts
payment for a covered service provided
to an enrollee in the federallyadministered PCIP (excepting only the
four benefit categories discussed below)
from charging the enrollee an amount
greater than the enrollee’s out-of-pocket
cost for the covered service as
calculated by the Plan based on the plan
allowance for the covered service. In
other words, as a condition of accepting
payment for most covered services,
facilities and providers will be
prohibited from ‘‘balance billing’’
enrollees in the federally-administered
PCIP for the difference between the plan
allowance for those covered services
and the charge for the covered service
that they might otherwise bill to a
patient who is not a federallyadministered PCIP enrollee.
Presented below is a discussion of the
specific regulatory provisions set forth
in this interim final rule.
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
This interim final rule specifies that
we are using our authority under section
1101(g)(2) of the Affordable Care Act to
set the payment rates for covered
services in the federally-administered
PCIP for dates of service beginning on
June 15, 2013. As explained below, with
the exception of covered services
furnished under the prescription drug,
organ/tissue transplant, dialysis and
durable medical equipment benefits,
covered services furnished to enrollees
in the federally-administered PCIP
program will be paid at—(1) 100 percent
of Medicare payment rates, or (2) where
Medicare payment rates cannot be
implemented by the federallyadministered PCIP, 50 percent of billed
charges or a rate generated pricing
methodology using a relative value scale
which is generally based on the
difficulty, time, work, risk and resources
of the service. (Hereafter, we generally
refer to this pricing methodology as
‘‘relative value scale’’ pricing.) These
rates will become the new plan
allowances for the covered services,
with the Plan being responsible for
reimbursing the facility or a provider for
a portion and the enrollee being
responsible for reimbursing the facility
or provider for the remainder, as
calculated by the Plan using the current
cost sharing rules described in the Plan
brochure.
A. Insufficient Funds (§ 152.35(c))
Section 1101(g)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act states that ‘‘[i]f the Secretary
estimates for any fiscal year that the
aggregate amounts available for the
payment of the expenses of the high risk
pool will be less than the actual amount
of such expenses, the Secretary shall
make such adjustments as are necessary
to eliminate such deficit.’’ We have
codified this provision at 45 CFR
152.35(b).
Since enrollment began in July 2010,
the PCIP program has experienced
significant and sustained growth,
providing affordable health care
insurance to more than 135,000 of the
sickest and most vulnerable uninsured
individuals with pre-existing
conditions. As a result, claims paid by
the PCIP program are, on average, 2.5
times higher than claims paid by state
high risk pools that predate the PCIP
program. Based on enrollment and
claims data, current HHS estimates
indicate that the aggregate amount
needed to pay for PCIP program
expenses may be greater than the
remaining funding appropriated by
Congress to pay for such expenses until
coverage under the program ends in
2014. Thus, to ensure that there is
sufficient funding to pay for the
expenses of the PCIP program until
2014, as directed by the statute, we are
adding a new § 152.35(c) to our
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
regulations. This new section states that
with the exception of covered services
furnished under the prescription drug,
organ/tissue transplant, dialysis and
durable medical equipment benefits, the
payment rates for covered services in
the federally-administered PCIP with
dates of service beginning June 15, 2013
will be paid at—(1) 100 percent of
Medicare payment rates; or (2) where
Medicare payment rates cannot be
implemented by the federallyadministered PCIP, 50 percent of billed
charges or a rate using relative value
scale pricing methodology. For purposes
of implementing this interim final rule,
we presume that (for covered services
paid at 50 percent of billed charges) a
facility or provider’s billed charge will
be reasonable. Such charges are subject
to review. The benefit and premium
provisions codified at 45 CFR part 152
Subpart D will not change. In addition,
as the new payment rates will become
the new plan allowances for the covered
services, we note that the Plan will be
responsible for reimbursing the facility
or a provider for a portion of these rates,
and the enrollee will be responsible for
reimbursing the facility or provider for
the remainder, as calculated by the Plan
using the current cost sharing rules
described in the Plan brochure.
HHS chose to index the new payment
rates that will apply to most covered
services to the Medicare payment rate
because Medicare rates are widely
accepted, familiar, and publicly
available. Since Medicare payment rates
are well known by facilities and
providers, we believe using a rate
indexed to Medicare best informs them
of what the payment rate for most
covered services will be. Based on
enrollment and claims data, current
HHS estimates indicate that
implementing a payment rate that is
100% percent of Medicare will allow us
to ensure that there is sufficient funding
to pay for the claims and administrative
expenses of the PCIP program until
coverage under the program ends in
2014.
Since the federally-administered PCIP
utilizes a third party administrator to
administer the Plan, there are a few
instances where Medicare rates cannot
serve as the basis for indexing the new
Plan rates. The payment rate for these
covered services will be 50 percent of
billed charges or calculated using a
relative value scale pricing
methodology. We have chosen to adopt
a different payment rate in such
instances to ensure that the services
currently covered under the Plan can
continue to be covered by the federallyadministered PCIP while also
addressing the need to further contain
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
program costs. These rates were chosen
because the federally-administered PCIP
can immediately operationalize them.
Given the short remaining life of the
program, and the limited number of
covered services to which these
payment rates would apply, we believe,
it would be inefficient and too costly for
HHS to operationalize other payment
rates that could be applied to these
covered services. We note that a facility
or provider will be able to contact the
federally-administered PCIP directly to
determine the plan allowance for one of
these covered services before providing
the service to a federally-administered
PCIP enrollee. Below, we discuss the
specific covered services for which
payment will be 50 percent of billed
charges or a rate generated using a
relative value scale pricing
methodology.
To the extent to which these covered
services are non-pharmaceutical
services, the payment rate will be
calculated using a the relative value
scale payment methodology that uses a
relative value scale generally based on
the difficulty, time, work, risk and
resources of the service. For
pharmaceutical services other than
those administered under the current
Plan prescription drug benefit, the
relative value scale payment
methodology is similar to the pricing
methodology used for Medicare Part B
drugs based on published acquisition
costs or average wholesale price for
pharmaceuticals as published in the Red
Book by RJ Health Systems, Thomson
Reuters. In these cases the plan
allowance will be based on the above
described relative value scale pricing
methodology and subject to the
prohibition on balance billing
(discussed below). If no Medicare
payment rate or relative value scale
pricing methodology is available, the
federally-administered PCIP will apply
the 50 percent of billed charges payment
rate. In these cases, the plan allowance
is also subject to the prohibition on
balance billing (discussed below).
Other instances where covered
services will be paid at 50 percent of
billed charges are—(1) Professional
services where there are no comparable
CPT codes; (2) facility based services
where the facility does not participate in
Medicare and therefore has no Medicare
ID; (3) facility-based services where
Medicare rates are not yet available or
not yet incorporated into the payment
software; (4) facility-based services
provided in a free-standing facility for
skilled nursing facilities, long-term
acute care facilities, rehabilitation
facilities, mental health and substance
abuse facilities; (5) facility-based
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30221
services where all data elements
required to calculate the Medicare
payment rate are not provided; (6)
facility-based services for home health
providers (UB billers only); and (7)
covered services that are not covered by
Medicare. In these cases the plan
allowance will be based on 50 percent
of billed charges and subject to the
prohibition on balance billing
(discussed below). Enrollees will,
however, remain responsible for paying
any applicable cost-sharing amounts, as
calculated by the Plan.
We are adopting these new payment
rates for the federally-administered PCIP
based on current enrollment projections
and the current rate of claims payment.
If these enrollment and claims
projections change after this interim
final rule goes into effect, HHS may opt,
through future rulemaking, to change
the payment rate.
Given the changes we have already
made to the prescription drug benefit in
the federally-administered PCIP as
previously discussed, we believe that
establishing new payment rates for
prescription drugs is not
administratively feasible or cost
effective. Therefore, the current plan
allowances that apply to the
prescription drug benefit in the
federally-administered PCIP will not be
affected by this interim final rule and
will continue to apply. Similarly, we
will not apply the new payment rates to
covered services furnished under the
organ/tissue transplant benefit to ensure
that enrollees continue to have access to
the federally-administered PCIP’s
network of transplant centers of
excellence, which we believe will lead
to fewer complications, shorter lengths
of stay, fewer readmissions, better
health outcomes, and lower costs.
Accordingly, the current plan
allowances for covered services
furnished under the organ/tissue
transplant benefit will remain the same.
Also, we will not apply a new payment
rate to the dialysis services provided
under the diagnostic and treatment
services benefit because we are unable
to operationalize a Medicare payment
rate. We believe that the current
negotiated rates with dialysis providers
result in payments that are likely to be
less than 50 percent of billed charges.
Therefore, we believe maintaining our
current in-network payment rate for this
service is more competitive than if we
were to implement a new payment rate
at 50 percent of the billed charge.
Finally, we will not apply the new
payment rates to covered services
furnished under the durable medical
equipment benefit, which currently is
provided to enrollees in the federally-
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
30222
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
administered PCIP on an in-network
basis only. We believe that the rates
currently paid for durable medical
equipment are at least as competitive as
Medicare payment rates.
This interim final rule establishes
new payment rates for most covered
services furnished in the federallyadministered PCIP. The federallyadministered PCIP is administered
directly by HHS. We note that HHS can
implement this interim final rule
quickly and efficiently. The state-based
PCIPs have previously indicated to HHS
that they are unable to implement new
facility and provider rates quickly.
Therefore, we have taken the
contracting strategy outlined herein
with state-based PCIPs.
B. Premiums and Cost-Sharing
(§ 152.21(c))
Section 1101(c)(2)(D) of the
Affordable Care Act requires that a PCIP
program established under this section
meet ‘‘any other requirements
determined appropriate’’ by the
Secretary. We are using this authority to
adopt a new requirement for the
federally-administered PCIP that
conditions a facility or provider’s
acceptance of the new payment rates
discussed above for most covered
services on the facility or provider’s
agreement not to balance bill the
enrollee for an amount greater than the
cost-sharing amount calculated by the
Plan.
Balance billing is a term generally
used to describe the practice of billing
a patient for the difference between the
plan allowance for a covered service
and the amount that the facility or
provider would otherwise charge for the
service. Although the federallyadministered PCIP currently contracts
with a network of facilities and
providers that have agreed not to
balance bill, it may not be able to
sustain that contractual arrangement as
it currently exists, or otherwise enter
into new contracts with networks that
will accept as payment in full the
payment rates we are adopting in this
interim final rule. Thus, the federallyadministered PCIP may operate without
a network for most covered services,
and the corresponding protection
against balance billing that has, to date,
been available to enrollees who choose
to use network facilities and providers.
Without such protection, enrollees in
the federally-administered PCIP could
become liable to pay significant out-ofpocket costs for many covered services.
We understand that facility and
provider charges will often be higher
than the rates we are setting in this
interim final rule. Allowing this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
financial liability to transfer to the
enrollee could leave federallyadministered PCIP enrollees no better
off than they would have been if they
had no PCIP coverage, and runs counter
to the entire PCIP concept, which is to
provide affordable health insurance
coverage to those who need it most.
Also, we believe that the payment rates
we are setting in this interim final rule
are still better than the alternative,
which is leaving facilities and providers
with the possibility of having to decide
whether to furnish uncompensated care.
Accordingly, to safeguard federallyadministered PCIP enrollees from
experiencing potentially significant
increases in their out-of-pocket costs
due to balance billing, we are adding a
new § 152.21(c) to our regulations.
Beginning with June 15, 2013 dates of
service, this new section requires all
facilities and providers that accept
payment from the federallyadministered PCIP for furnishing a
covered service to an enrollee (with the
exception of covered services furnished
under the prescription drug, organ/
tissue transplant, dialysis and durable
medical equipment benefits) to accept
as payment in full the plan allowance
for the covered service, which includes
the cost-sharing amount calculated by
the Plan for the covered service. With
respect to these covered services,
facilities or providers may not bill the
enrollee for an amount greater than the
amount determined by the Plan to be
the enrollee’s cost-sharing amount for
the covered service.
The prohibition on balance billing
will not apply to covered services
furnished under the prescription drug,
organ/tissue transplant, dialysis and
durable medical equipment benefits
because, as explained above, covered
services furnished under these benefits
will continued to be paid at the existing
in-network payment rates. We do not
apply the balance billing prohibition to
these covered services because it is our
desire to encourage federallyadministered enrollees to continue to
seek treatment for these covered
services from in network facilities and
providers for the cost-containment
reasons described above.
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and the 60-Day Delay in the Effective
Date
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551, et seq.), a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are
generally required before promulgation
of a regulation. We also ordinarily
provide a 60-day delay in the effective
date of the provisions of a rule in
accordance with the APA (5 U.S.C.
553(d)), which requires a 30-day
delayed effective date and the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
801(a)(3)), which requires a 60-day
delayed effective date for major rules.
However, this procedure can be
waived if the agency, for good cause,
finds that notice and public comment
and delay in effective date are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest and incorporates a
statement of the finding and its reasons
in the rule issued. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3); 5
U.S.C. 808(2).
HHS has determined that issuing this
regulation in proposed form, such that
it would not become effective until after
public comments are submitted,
considered, and responded to in a final
rule, would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The PCIP
program is intended to provide benefits
to eligible uninsured individuals with
pre-existing conditions until 2014.
However, the funding available to pay
claims against, and the administrative
costs of, the PCIP program is limited by
statute, and HHS estimates that, at the
current rate of expenditure, the
aggregate amount needed for the
payment of program expenses may be
greater than the amount of remaining
funding appropriated by the Congress to
pay such expenses. Moreover, for
individuals with pre-existing conditions
enrolled in the PCIP program, the
program may be their only available
source of health coverage before
prohibitions on discrimination by
health insurance issuers based on preexisting conditions go into effect in
January 2014. It is critical to the
continued sustainability of the program
that the new payment rates go into effect
as soon as operationally possible. A
delay in the implementation of the new
reimbursement rates beyond June 15,
2013 would risk program funds being
exhausted prior to 2014.
We also believe that it would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to delay the implementation of
a policy that prohibits facilities and
providers from billing federally-
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
administered PCIP enrollees for the
difference between the plan allowance
for most covered services and the
amount they would otherwise charge for
the covered services. The PCIP program
is a program of last resort for
individuals who, because of their preexisting conditions, are either denied
coverage in the individual market
altogether, or can only obtain coverage
that excludes their pre-existing
condition (often at substantially higher
premium rates than those paid by other
individuals). The Affordable Care Act
not only makes coverage available to
these individuals until the more general
pre-existing condition protections
become available in 2014, but does so at
a lower cost than they otherwise would
likely have to pay if they did not have
health coverage. Furthermore, if the
network currently in place in the
federally-administered PCIP became
unavailable as a result of the new
payment rates being set in this interim
final rule, we are concerned that the
balance billed charges could cause
irreparable financial harm to enrollees
and deter them from seeking services at
all. Because we want not only to
preserve the program benefit structure
as intended by the Congress, but also
meet the needs of enrollees in the
federally-administered PCIP who expect
that their out-of-pocket costs will be
limited, we believe that it would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to create a situation in which
these enrollees are either deterred from
seeking covered benefits under the
program altogether, or are forced to pay
substantially higher out-of-pocket costs
than they would have otherwise had to
pay absent our adoption of a policy
prohibiting balance billing in this
interim final rule.
For the foregoing reasons, we find
good cause to waive the notice of
proposed rulemaking and 60-day delay
in the effective date and to issue this
final rule on an interim basis.
We are providing a 60-day public
comment period, and this regulation
will be effective on June 15, 2013.
V. Collection of Information
Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, we are required to provide 60day notice in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment before a
collection of information requirement is
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval.
We are not soliciting public comment
on these issues addressed in this interim
final rule because we are not making
changes to the information collections
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
associated with this program, which are
covered under OMB Control Number
OMB–0938–1100.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Summary and Need for Regulatory
Action
Section 1101 of Title I of the
Affordable Care Act requires that the
Secretary establish, either directly or
through contracts with states or
nonprofit private entities, a temporary
high risk pool program to provide
affordable health insurance benefits to
eligible uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions. The Affordable Care
Act envisions that this program will
provide coverage to eligible uninsured
individuals with preexisting conditions
until 2014, when these individuals will
begin to have access to a broader range
of affordable health coverage options,
including qualified health plans offered
through new Health Insurance
Exchanges established under sections
1311 or 1321 of the Affordable Care Act.
An interim final rule published July 10,
2010 (75 FR 45014) set forth and
addressed key issues regarding
administration of the program,
eligibility and enrollment, benefits,
premiums, funding, appeals rules, and
enforcement provisions related to antidumping and fraud, waste, and abuse.
This interim final rule sets forth new
payment rates that apply to most
covered services with dates of service
beginning June 15, 2013, in the
federally-administered PCIP. Payment
rates for covered services—with the
exception of covered services furnished
under the prescription drug, organ/
tissue transplant, dialysis and durable
medical equipment benefits will be—(1)
100 percent of Medicare payment rates;
or (2) where Medicare payment rates
cannot be implemented by the federallyadministered PCIP, 50 percent of billed
charges or a rate generated using a
relative value scale pricing
methodology. This interim final rule is
an exercise of our authority to make
program changes that we have
determined are prudent and necessary
to ensure that there is sufficient funding
to pay for program expenses until 2014.
Additionally, to protect federallyadministered PCIP enrollees from
potentially becoming financially liable
to pay significant costs for covered
services as an unintended consequence
of this interim final rule, we are
adopting a policy that prohibits
facilities and providers from billing an
enrollee for the difference between the
plan allowance for a covered service
(with the exception of covered services
furnished under the prescription drug,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30223
organ/tissue transplant, dialysis and
durable medical equipment benefits)
and the amount that they would
otherwise charge for the covered
service. In other words, facilities and
providers that furnish covered services
to federally-administered PCIP enrollees
must accept, as payment in full, the
plan allowance for most of those
covered services (as determined by the
Plan) and not bill the enrollee for an
amount greater than the cost-sharing
amount that the federally-administered
PCIP has calculated for the covered
service.
Executive Order 12866 explicitly
requires agencies to take account of
‘‘distributive impacts’’ and ‘‘equity.’’
Setting the federally-administered PCIP
payment rates applicable to most
covered services with dates of service
beginning on June 15, 2013, is prudent
and necessary to ensure the PCIP
program continues to provide benefits to
enrolled individuals with pre-existing
conditions who cannot obtain health
coverage in the existing insurance
market until 2014, when these
individuals will begin to have access to
a broader range of coverage options,
including qualified health plans offered
through new health insurance
marketplaces established under sections
1311 or 1321 of the Affordable Care Act.
Based on enrollment and claims data,
current HHS estimates indicate that the
aggregate amount needed to pay for
PCIP expenses may be greater than the
remaining funding appropriated by
Congress to pay for such expenses until
coverage under the program ends in
2014. Therefore, it is critical that we set
the new payment rates and prohibit
balance billing under the federallyadministered PCIP as soon as
operationally possible so that we can
ensure that funding remains available to
provide benefits to PCIP enrollees until
2014 and enrollees are protected from
potentially significant out-of-pocket
costs.
B. Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735), a ‘‘significant’’ regulatory action
is subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Section 3(f) of the Executive Order
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
rule— (1) having an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more in any
one year, or adversely and materially
affecting a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
state, local or tribal governments or
communities (also referred to as
‘‘economically significant’’); (2) creating
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
30224
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfering with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raising novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order. OMB
has determined that this regulation is
economically significant within the
meaning of section 3(f)(1) of the
Executive Order, because it is likely to
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million in at least 1 year.
Accordingly, OMB has reviewed this
rule pursuant to the Executive Order.
HHS provides an assessment of the
potential costs, benefits, and transfers
associated with this interim final
regulation, summarized in the following
table.
TABLE 1.1— ACCOUNTING TABLE
Benefits:
Qualitative: The reduction in per-claim
costs paid by the federally-administered Pre-Existing Condition Insurance
Plan will help to ensure that the PCIP
program can continue providing benefits to current enrollees who were previously denied health coverage due to
their pre-existing condition. Facilities
and providers serving enrollees in the
Plan will continue to receive payment
for such care, rather than risk receiving no payment for such care should
they choose to continue treating the
enrollee and PCIP program funding is
exhausted prior to 2014.
Costs:
Qualitative: Health care facilities and
providers will get paid less by the Plan
for the same covered services, although given the small number of
PCIP enrollees and large amount of
uncompensated care that might otherwise be sought by these enrollees, we
estimate this cost is minimal.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
a. Estimated Number of Affected
Entities
This interim final rule sets new
payment rates for most covered services
in the federally-administered PreExisting Condition Insurance Plan
(PCIP) furnished beginning on June 15,
2013. It also prohibits a facility or
provider from balance billing a
federally-administered PCIP enrollee in
most circumstances.
Only facilities and providers
furnishing covered services to federallyadministered PCIP enrollees will be
affected by the new payment rates and
prohibition on balance billing. Although
payment rates will be reduced, facilities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
and providers choosing to continue to
furnish covered services to PCIP
enrollees will continue to receive
payment, whereas in the absence of
PCIP, they might not be able to continue
treating the individuals unless they
furnish uncompensated care. Although
the federally-administered PCIP
currently includes an in-network
benefit, enrollees are also able to receive
treatment out-of-network, thereby
making it difficult to quantify the
number of facilities and providers that
will be affected by this interim final
rule.
b. Benefits
A key premise for the establishment
of the PCIP program was that those who
are unable to purchase private health
insurance coverage due to a pre-existing
condition are potentially disadvantaged
as a result of both poor health and loss
of income. We expect that this interim
final regulation will help more than
100,000 current enrollees continue to
receive coverage until 2014. According
to the 2009 report entitled ‘‘Financial
and Health Burden of Chronic
Conditions Grow,’’ released by the
Center for Studying Health System
Change, about 60 percent of the
uninsured who have chronic conditions
delay care or did not fill a prescription
due to cost. Lack of health coverage
often leads to significant medical debt,
and uncompensated and expensive care
at sites such as emergency rooms,
shifting these costs in the health system
to people with insurance coverage to
offset the cost of this uncompensated
care. Given these potential
consequences of PCIP enrollees losing
coverage and becoming uninsured prior
to the coverage protections that will go
into effect in 2014, this interim final
regulation could generate significant
benefits to enrolled individuals, for
whom it will be possible to continue to
be enrolled in the PCIP program. Absent
this interim final rule, the PCIP program
could exhaust its $5 billion in
appropriated funding before the end of
the program in 2014.
The Regulatory Impact Analysis
included in the preamble to the 2010
PCIP interim final regulation included a
discussion of the PCIP program’s benefit
to program-eligible individuals, as
compared to the absence of the program.
This interim final rule better ensures the
continued existence of the program
until 2014, as an alternative to the
absence of the program during that time
period. Therefore, we refer readers to
the discussion of the benefits to
program-eligible individuals that
appears in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis of the July 30, 2010 interim
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
final regulation (75 FR 45026). These
benefits could take the form of
reductions in mortality and morbidity,
reductions in medical expenditure risk,
and increases in worker productivity.
Each of these effects is described in that
Regulatory Impact Analysis.
c. Costs and Transfers
Under Section 1101 of the Affordable
Care Act, HHS is authorized to disperse
$5 billion to pay claims and the
administrative costs of the PCIP
program that are in excess of premiums
collected from enrollees.
There will be administrative costs
associated with this interim final rule.
The federally-administered PCIP claims
processing contractor will incur
minimal administrative costs to
implement the payment rates required
by this regulation to ensure that its
systems are properly coded to pay the
payment rates established under this
interim final rule. This cost will be
minimal because the claims processing
contractor has an existing system in
place to adjust its payment rates to
reduce the payment rates to the amount
specified.
This interim final rule will not
increase or decrease costs to the federal
government. The Congress appropriated
$5 billion for the PCIP program, and
HHS intends to spend that $5 billion for
PCIP-related costs, although this
regulation will change how a portion of
the remaining $5 billion is distributed
by spreading funding for the maximum
period of time by setting new payment
rates in the federally-administered PCIP.
With respect to other parties, we lack
data with which to quantify costs
associated with this regulation. Setting
new payment rates for most covered
services under the federallyadministered PCIP program gives
facilities and providers two choices.
One choice is to continue to treat
federally-administered PCIP enrollees
and accept the payment rates set by this
regulation as payment in full. We
acknowledge that facilities and
providers would, in general, be paid less
to treat PCIP enrollees but we believe
such cost is minimal (relative to
facilities and providers’ annual
revenues). In the absence of this
regulation, funding for the PCIP
program may be exhausted prior to
2014, causing enrollees to seek from the
same facilities and providers
uncompensated and expensive care.
Facilities and providers who furnish
covered services to individuals enrolled
in the federally-administered PCIP, the
anticipated reduction in PCIP revenue
per claim will not, in the aggregate,
eliminate their overall PCIP revenue.
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
The other choice that facilities and
providers have is to no longer treat PCIP
enrollees. While we understand that the
decision to no longer treat PCIP
enrollees is possible, we believe and are
hopeful that most facilities and
providers will accept the new payment
rates established in this interim final
rule given the serious health conditions
many federally-administered PCIP
enrollees have and the prospect that
such reduced payment is temporary
until 2014 when no one can generally be
denied health coverage because of a preexisting condition. Facilities or
providers who choose to not accept the
payment rates established in this
interim final rule could limit a
federally-administered PCIP enrollee’s
ability to access health care services.
However, this same possibility would
occur if the PCIP program were to end
before 2014. Lastly, because the PCIP
program serves such a small population
nationwide, and the program is
temporary in nature, it is unlikely that
a facility or provider’s annual revenue
would be significantly impacted by
continuing to treat PCIP enrollees at the
new payment rate. Therefore, we believe
that this interim final regulation has
minimal cost to such providers and
facilities.
d. Conclusion
Under section 1101 of the Affordable
Care Act, HHS is authorized to spend $5
billion for the purpose of funding the
PCIP program. Implementing this
interim final regulation, through which
HHS is setting payment rates for most
covered services under the federallyadministered PCIP program to 100
percent of Medicare payment rates, may
not impose any substantial financial
costs on any parties.
For facilities and providers, the
anticipated reduction in PCIP revenue
per claim will likely be offset by the cost
of uncompensated care in the absence of
the PCIP program, a cost that facilities
and providers would frequently incur if
the PCIP program terminated earlier
than 2014, due to funds being
exhausted. Therefore, this interim final
regulation has, in aggregate, minimal
cost to such facilities and providers. By
ensuing that coverage continues through
the end of the year, when new options
become available, the payment rates set
forth in this interim final regulation will
likely have a significant, positive
financial impact on individuals enrolled
in the program.
We anticipate that PCIP enrollees,
who might otherwise lose their PCIP
coverage will benefit from this interim
final rule because they will be able to
maintain their PCIP coverage. We also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
anticipate that ensuring the PCIP
program’s existence through 2014 will
reduce the burden on local and state
governments to pay health care facilities
and providers for uncompensated care
and prevent shifting of uncompensated
care costs in the health system to people
with insurance coverage to offset the
cost of such uncompensated care.
VII. Other Sections
Regulatory Alternatives
Under the Executive Order, we must
consider alternatives to issuing
regulations and alternative regulatory
approaches. This interim final rule sets
payment rates for covered services in
the federally-administered PCIP with
dates of service beginning June 15, 2013
to reduce the rate of expenditures in
order to eliminate the potential funding
deficit estimated to occur in calendar
year 2013. While other program
modifications, as previously
summarized, have been implemented to
contain program costs, no other viable
alternatives were identified that could
substitute for the changes included in
this interim final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires agencies that issue a regulation
to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses if a rule has a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The RFA
generally defines a ‘‘small entity’’ as—
(1) A proprietary firm meeting the size
standards of the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit
organization that is not dominant in its
field; or (3) a small government
jurisdiction with a population of less
than 50,000. States and individuals are
not included in the definition of ‘‘small
entity.’’ The Secretary certifies that this
interim final rule will not have
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates would require
certain spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2013, that
threshold is approximately $141
million.
UMRA does not address the total cost
of a rule. Rather, it focuses on certain
categories of cost, mainly those ‘‘federal
mandate’’ costs resulting from—(1)
Imposing enforceable duties on state,
local, or tribal governments, or on the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30225
private sector; or (2) increasing the
stringency of conditions in, or
decreasing the funding of, state, local, or
tribal governments under entitlement
programs.
Under the Affordable Care Act, states
(or their designated nonprofit, private
entities) chose to contract with HHS to
administer PCIP and receive federal
funding for doing so. If they did not
choose to administer a PCIP, HHS
established a PCIP in the state. Thus,
this interim final rule does not impose
an unfunded mandate on states.
Enrolled individuals have to pay a
premium and other out-of-pocket
expenses to maintain their enrollment
in a PCIP. However, individuals are free
to disenroll based on their evaluation of
the costs and benefits of remaining in
the program. There is no automatic
enrollment and no requirement to enroll
or remain enrolled in a PCIP. Thus, this
interim final rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on the private sector.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the specific provisions of the
Affordable Care Act, States or Statedelegated non-profit entities are
contractors of the HHS in the
implementation of the PCIP program.
HHS has given those contractors
flexibility within the parameters
provided by the Affordable Care Act and
within the budgetary capacity of the
program.
Congressional Review Act
This proposed regulation is subject to
the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq) and has been
transmitted to the Congress and
Comptroller General for review.
V. Statutory Authority
This interim final rule is adopted
pursuant to the authority contained in
section 1101 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L.
111–148).
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 152
Administrative practice and
procedure, Health care, Health
insurance, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Health and
Human Services amends 45 CFR subtitle
A, subchapter B, part 152 as set forth
below:
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
30226
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
PART 152—PRE–EXISTING
CONDITION INSURANCE PLAN
PROGRAM
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
1. The authority citation for part 152
continues to read as follows:
[CG Docket No. 10–213; WT Docket No. 96–
198; and CG Docket No. 10–145; FCC 13–
57]
47 CFR Part 14
■
Authority: Sec. 1101 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L.
111–148).
2. Section 152.21 is amended by
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows.
■
§ 152.21
Premiums and cost-sharing.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Prohibition on balance billing in
the PCIP administered by HHS. A
facility or provider that accepts payment
under § 152.35(c)(2) for a covered
service furnished to an enrollee may not
bill the enrollee for an amount greater
than the cost-sharing amount for the
covered service calculated by the PCIP.
3. Section 152.35 is amended by
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows.
■
§ 152.35.
Insufficient funds.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Payment rates for covered services
furnished beginning June 15, 2013 to
enrollees in the PCIP administered by
HHS. (1) Covered services furnished
under the prescription drug, organ/
tissue transplant, dialysis and durable
medical equipment benefits will be paid
at the payment rates that are in effect on
June 15, 2013.
(2) With respect to all other covered
services, the payment rates will be—
(i) 100 percent of Medicare payment
rates; or
(ii) Where Medicare payment rates
cannot be implemented by the federallyadministered PCIP, 50 percent of billed
charges or a rate using a relative value
scale pricing methodology.
Dated: May 15, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Dated: May 16, 2013.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–12145 Filed 5–17–13; 4:15 pm]
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4150–03–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
Accessibility Requirements for Internet
Browsers
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission adopts rules to implement
section 718 of the Communications Act
of 1934 (the Act), as amended, which
was added to the Act by the TwentyFirst Century Communications and
Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA).
Section 718 of the Act requires Internet
browsers built into mobile phones to be
accessible to individuals who are blind
or visually impaired. In this document,
the Commission also affirms that section
716 of the Act requires certain Internet
browsers used for advanced
communications services to be
accessible to people with disabilities.
DATES: Effective October 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliot
Greenwald, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability
Rights Office, at (202) 418–2235 or
email Eliot.Greenwald@fcc.gov, or
Rosaline Crawford, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability
Rights Office, at (202) 418–2075 or
email Rosaline.Crawford@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Second
Report Order, document FCC 13–57,
adopted on April 26, 2013, and released
on April 29, 2013, in CG Docket No. 10–
213, WT Docket No. 96–198, and CG
Docket No. 10–145. The full text of
document FCC 13–57 will be available
for public inspection and copying via
ECFS, and during regular business
hours at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
It also may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II,
445 12th Street SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone: (800)
378–3160, fax: (202) 488–5563, or
Internet: www.bcpiweb.com. Document
FCC 13–57 can also be downloaded in
Word or Portable Document Format
(PDF) at https://www.fcc.gov/document/
section-718-accessibility-requirementsinternet-browsers-mobile. To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice) or
(202) 418–0432 (TTY).
Final Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
Document FCC 13–57 does not
contain new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any new
or modified information collection
burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to
the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
I. Introduction
1. In document FCC 13–57, the
Commission implements section 718 of
the Act, which was added by section
104 of the CVAA to ensure that people
with disabilities have access to
emerging and innovative advanced
communications technologies. Section
718 of the Act requires mobile phone
manufacturers and mobile service
providers that include or arrange for the
inclusion of an Internet browser on
mobile phones to ensure that the
functions of the included browser are
accessible to and usable by individuals
who are blind or have a visual
impairment, unless doing so is not
achievable. In addition, in document
FCC 13–57, the Commission affirms its
previous conclusions regarding the
coverage of Internet browsers used for
ACS under section 716 of the Act, and
retains the recordkeeping requirements
and deadlines for entities covered under
section 718 of the Act.
II. Background
2. On October 7, 2011, the
Commission adopted rules, published at
76 FR 82353, December 30, 2011,
implementing section 716 of the Act
(also added by the CVAA), which
requires advanced communications
services (ACS) and equipment used for
ACS to be accessible to and usable by
individuals with disabilities, unless
doing so is not achievable. 47 U.S.C.
617; 47 CFR 14.1—14.21 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission
also adopted rules to implement section
717, which establishes recordkeeping
and enforcement requirements for
entities covered under sections 255,
716, and 718 of the Act. 47 U.S.C. 618;
47 CFR 14.30—14.52 of the
Commission’s rules. In addition, the
Commission adopted a Further Notice of
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 22, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30218-30226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12145]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 152
[CMS-9995-IFC3]
RIN 0938-AQ70
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan Program
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interim final rule with comment period sets the payment
rates for covered services furnished to individuals enrolled in the
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) program administered
directly by HHS beginning with covered services furnished on June 15,
2013. This interim
[[Page 30219]]
final rule also prohibits facilities and providers who, with respect to
dates of service beginning on June 15, 2013, accept payment for most
covered services furnished to an enrollee in the federally-administered
PCIP from charging the enrollee an amount greater than the enrollee's
out-of-pocket cost for the covered service as calculated by the plan.
The PCIP program was established under Section 1101 of Title I of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act).
DATES: Effective date: This interim final regulation is effective on
June 15, 2013.
Comment date: To be assured consideration, written comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on July 22, 2013. Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-9995-IFC3.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed).
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions under
the ``More Search Options'' tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-9995-IFC3, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-9995-IFC3, Mail
Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period
to either of the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786-4492 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will be also available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Simpson, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, (410) 786-
0017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, (Pub. L. 111-148)
was enacted on March 23, 2010; the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Reconciliation Act), (Pub. L. 111-152) was
enacted on March 30, 2010 (collectively, ``Affordable Care Act'').
Section 1101 of the Affordable Care Act directs the Secretary of Health
and Human Services (HHS) to establish, either directly or through
contracts with states or nonprofit private entities, a temporary high
risk health insurance pool program to provide access to affordable
health insurance coverage to eligible uninsured individuals with pre-
existing conditions. A number of states elected to contract with HHS to
establish and administer a high risk pool using PCIP funds. HHS
directly established and administers a high risk pool in the remaining
states and the District of Columbia. (Hereafter, we generally refer to
this program as the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan program, or
the PCIP program. We refer to the PCIP program administered by HHS as
the ``federally-administered PCIP'' or the ``Plan'' and a PCIP program
administered by a state or its designated entity as a ``state-based
PCIP.'') The PCIP program is intended to provide health insurance
coverage to eligible uninsured individuals with pre-existing conditions
until 2014. Beginning in 2014, most health insurance issuers will be
required to offer coverage to all individuals, regardless of pre-
existing conditions, pursuant to section 2704 of the Public Health
Service Act. Eligible individuals will be able to obtain health
insurance coverage either by enrolling in a qualified health plan
offered through the new Health Insurance Exchanges (also called
Marketplaces) established under section 1311 or 1321 of the Affordable
Care Act, or by enrolling in health insurance coverage offered in the
individual or group market outside of the Exchanges.
As a temporary bridge to the provisions that go into effect
beginning in 2014, the PCIP program was designed to provide coverage to
eligible individuals who have been locked out of the insurance market
due to their health status. Since enrollment began in July 2010, the
PCIP program has experienced significant and sustained growth,
enrolling more than 135,000 otherwise uninsured individuals with pre-
existing conditions. Many PCIP enrollees have serious health conditions
that require immediate and ongoing medical treatment including severe
or life threatening conditions such as cancer. In 2012, the average
annual claims cost paid per enrollee was $32,108. This cost per
enrollee exceeds even that of state high risk pools that predate the
Affordable Care Act for several reasons. Like other high risk pools,
PCIP enrollees are limited to people that were previously considered
uninsurable due to high expected claims cost. In contrast to many state
high risk pools, PCIP enrollees also do not
[[Page 30220]]
experience any waiting periods or pre-existing condition exclusions
upon enrollment in the program.
The combined effect of the number of individuals enrolled in the
program, particularly very sick individuals, their high utilization of
covered services, and the statutory limitations on enrollee cost-
sharing (which limits the maximum amount an enrollee pays out-of-pocket
for covered services to $6,250 in 2013) has led to a situation where
the overall cost of the PCIP program is higher than originally
projected. While the actuarial estimates that HHS relies on to manage
the program fluctuate as new claims data is received and processed,
given the current enrollment projections and the current rate of claims
payment, the aggregate amount needed for the payment of the expenses of
the PCIP program is estimated to exceed the amount of remaining funding
appropriated by Congress to pay for such expenses until the statutory
end to the program in 2014, unless we implement the policy changes
being announced in this interim final rule.
We have already taken measures to contain costs, with the intent of
sustaining the program until 2014. In May of 2012, the federally-
administered PCIP ceased paying referral fees to agents and brokers in
connection with enrolled individuals they had referred to the program
and began requiring that applications for enrollment include
documentation showing that the individual had been denied health
insurance coverage due to the existence of a pre-existing condition. On
August 1, 2012, the federally-administered PCIP switched provider
networks, reducing both its negotiated and out-of-network payment rates
to providers. This network change was followed by a targeted effort to
negotiate additional discounts from in-network inpatient facilities
that were treating a large number of PCIP enrollees. Additionally in
2012, the federally-administered PCIP limited the specialty drug
benefit such that the plan would only cover specialty drugs dispensed
by in-network pharmacies.
Beginning January 1, 2013, the federally-administered PCIP
implemented additional cost containment measures, including--(1) The
elimination of two of three former plan options in favor of a single
plan option; (2) an increase in the maximum out-of-pocket limit from
$4,000 to $6,250 for in-network services; and (3) an increase in
coinsurance, once the deductible has been met, from 20 percent to 30
percent of the plan allowance for in-network covered services.
Furthermore, on February 15, 2013, the federally-administered PCIP
suspended its acceptance of new enrollment applications until further
notice.
State-based PCIPs suspended their acceptance of new enrollment
applications received after March 2, 2013. Additionally, a number of
state-based PCIPs have taken measures to constrain costs in their
programs, for example, by renegotiating their facility and physician
reimbursement rates or by setting their payment rates at levels similar
to the rates paid by Medicare. Lastly, in May 2013 HHS began
negotiations with state-based PCIPs on a final program contract, with a
period of performance running from June 1, 2013 through December 31,
2013. The contract HHS will offer to state-based PCIPs will be a cost
reimbursement contract up to, but not exceeding, the funding obligated
in the contract.
Based on estimates, HHS believes it is prudent and necessary to
make additional adjustments in the federally-administered PCIP with
respect to payment rates for covered services in order to ensure that
there is sufficient funding available to provide coverage to currently
enrolled individuals until the program ends in 2014.
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
This interim final rule specifies that we are using our authority
under section 1101(g)(2) of the Affordable Care Act to set the payment
rates for covered services in the federally-administered PCIP for dates
of service beginning on June 15, 2013. As explained below, with the
exception of covered services furnished under the prescription drug,
organ/tissue transplant, dialysis and durable medical equipment
benefits, covered services furnished to enrollees in the federally-
administered PCIP program will be paid at--(1) 100 percent of Medicare
payment rates, or (2) where Medicare payment rates cannot be
implemented by the federally-administered PCIP, 50 percent of billed
charges or a rate generated pricing methodology using a relative value
scale which is generally based on the difficulty, time, work, risk and
resources of the service. (Hereafter, we generally refer to this
pricing methodology as ``relative value scale'' pricing.) These rates
will become the new plan allowances for the covered services, with the
Plan being responsible for reimbursing the facility or a provider for a
portion and the enrollee being responsible for reimbursing the facility
or provider for the remainder, as calculated by the Plan using the
current cost sharing rules described in the Plan brochure.
Furthermore, to protect enrollees in the federally-administered
PCIP from having to shoulder potentially significant costs that could
be shifted to them as a result of this new payment policy, we are also
adopting a policy that prohibits any facility or provider who, with
respect to dates of service beginning on June 15, 2013, accepts payment
for a covered service provided to an enrollee in the federally-
administered PCIP (excepting only the four benefit categories discussed
below) from charging the enrollee an amount greater than the enrollee's
out-of-pocket cost for the covered service as calculated by the Plan
based on the plan allowance for the covered service. In other words, as
a condition of accepting payment for most covered services, facilities
and providers will be prohibited from ``balance billing'' enrollees in
the federally-administered PCIP for the difference between the plan
allowance for those covered services and the charge for the covered
service that they might otherwise bill to a patient who is not a
federally-administered PCIP enrollee.
Presented below is a discussion of the specific regulatory
provisions set forth in this interim final rule.
A. Insufficient Funds (Sec. 152.35(c))
Section 1101(g)(2) of the Affordable Care Act states that ``[i]f
the Secretary estimates for any fiscal year that the aggregate amounts
available for the payment of the expenses of the high risk pool will be
less than the actual amount of such expenses, the Secretary shall make
such adjustments as are necessary to eliminate such deficit.'' We have
codified this provision at 45 CFR 152.35(b).
Since enrollment began in July 2010, the PCIP program has
experienced significant and sustained growth, providing affordable
health care insurance to more than 135,000 of the sickest and most
vulnerable uninsured individuals with pre-existing conditions. As a
result, claims paid by the PCIP program are, on average, 2.5 times
higher than claims paid by state high risk pools that predate the PCIP
program. Based on enrollment and claims data, current HHS estimates
indicate that the aggregate amount needed to pay for PCIP program
expenses may be greater than the remaining funding appropriated by
Congress to pay for such expenses until coverage under the program ends
in 2014. Thus, to ensure that there is sufficient funding to pay for
the expenses of the PCIP program until 2014, as directed by the
statute, we are adding a new Sec. 152.35(c) to our
[[Page 30221]]
regulations. This new section states that with the exception of covered
services furnished under the prescription drug, organ/tissue
transplant, dialysis and durable medical equipment benefits, the
payment rates for covered services in the federally-administered PCIP
with dates of service beginning June 15, 2013 will be paid at--(1) 100
percent of Medicare payment rates; or (2) where Medicare payment rates
cannot be implemented by the federally-administered PCIP, 50 percent of
billed charges or a rate using relative value scale pricing
methodology. For purposes of implementing this interim final rule, we
presume that (for covered services paid at 50 percent of billed
charges) a facility or provider's billed charge will be reasonable.
Such charges are subject to review. The benefit and premium provisions
codified at 45 CFR part 152 Subpart D will not change. In addition, as
the new payment rates will become the new plan allowances for the
covered services, we note that the Plan will be responsible for
reimbursing the facility or a provider for a portion of these rates,
and the enrollee will be responsible for reimbursing the facility or
provider for the remainder, as calculated by the Plan using the current
cost sharing rules described in the Plan brochure.
HHS chose to index the new payment rates that will apply to most
covered services to the Medicare payment rate because Medicare rates
are widely accepted, familiar, and publicly available. Since Medicare
payment rates are well known by facilities and providers, we believe
using a rate indexed to Medicare best informs them of what the payment
rate for most covered services will be. Based on enrollment and claims
data, current HHS estimates indicate that implementing a payment rate
that is 100% percent of Medicare will allow us to ensure that there is
sufficient funding to pay for the claims and administrative expenses of
the PCIP program until coverage under the program ends in 2014.
Since the federally-administered PCIP utilizes a third party
administrator to administer the Plan, there are a few instances where
Medicare rates cannot serve as the basis for indexing the new Plan
rates. The payment rate for these covered services will be 50 percent
of billed charges or calculated using a relative value scale pricing
methodology. We have chosen to adopt a different payment rate in such
instances to ensure that the services currently covered under the Plan
can continue to be covered by the federally-administered PCIP while
also addressing the need to further contain program costs. These rates
were chosen because the federally-administered PCIP can immediately
operationalize them. Given the short remaining life of the program, and
the limited number of covered services to which these payment rates
would apply, we believe, it would be inefficient and too costly for HHS
to operationalize other payment rates that could be applied to these
covered services. We note that a facility or provider will be able to
contact the federally-administered PCIP directly to determine the plan
allowance for one of these covered services before providing the
service to a federally-administered PCIP enrollee. Below, we discuss
the specific covered services for which payment will be 50 percent of
billed charges or a rate generated using a relative value scale pricing
methodology.
To the extent to which these covered services are non-
pharmaceutical services, the payment rate will be calculated using a
the relative value scale payment methodology that uses a relative value
scale generally based on the difficulty, time, work, risk and resources
of the service. For pharmaceutical services other than those
administered under the current Plan prescription drug benefit, the
relative value scale payment methodology is similar to the pricing
methodology used for Medicare Part B drugs based on published
acquisition costs or average wholesale price for pharmaceuticals as
published in the Red Book by RJ Health Systems, Thomson Reuters. In
these cases the plan allowance will be based on the above described
relative value scale pricing methodology and subject to the prohibition
on balance billing (discussed below). If no Medicare payment rate or
relative value scale pricing methodology is available, the federally-
administered PCIP will apply the 50 percent of billed charges payment
rate. In these cases, the plan allowance is also subject to the
prohibition on balance billing (discussed below).
Other instances where covered services will be paid at 50 percent
of billed charges are--(1) Professional services where there are no
comparable CPT codes; (2) facility based services where the facility
does not participate in Medicare and therefore has no Medicare ID; (3)
facility-based services where Medicare rates are not yet available or
not yet incorporated into the payment software; (4) facility-based
services provided in a free-standing facility for skilled nursing
facilities, long-term acute care facilities, rehabilitation facilities,
mental health and substance abuse facilities; (5) facility-based
services where all data elements required to calculate the Medicare
payment rate are not provided; (6) facility-based services for home
health providers (UB billers only); and (7) covered services that are
not covered by Medicare. In these cases the plan allowance will be
based on 50 percent of billed charges and subject to the prohibition on
balance billing (discussed below). Enrollees will, however, remain
responsible for paying any applicable cost-sharing amounts, as
calculated by the Plan.
We are adopting these new payment rates for the federally-
administered PCIP based on current enrollment projections and the
current rate of claims payment. If these enrollment and claims
projections change after this interim final rule goes into effect, HHS
may opt, through future rulemaking, to change the payment rate.
Given the changes we have already made to the prescription drug
benefit in the federally-administered PCIP as previously discussed, we
believe that establishing new payment rates for prescription drugs is
not administratively feasible or cost effective. Therefore, the current
plan allowances that apply to the prescription drug benefit in the
federally-administered PCIP will not be affected by this interim final
rule and will continue to apply. Similarly, we will not apply the new
payment rates to covered services furnished under the organ/tissue
transplant benefit to ensure that enrollees continue to have access to
the federally-administered PCIP's network of transplant centers of
excellence, which we believe will lead to fewer complications, shorter
lengths of stay, fewer readmissions, better health outcomes, and lower
costs. Accordingly, the current plan allowances for covered services
furnished under the organ/tissue transplant benefit will remain the
same. Also, we will not apply a new payment rate to the dialysis
services provided under the diagnostic and treatment services benefit
because we are unable to operationalize a Medicare payment rate. We
believe that the current negotiated rates with dialysis providers
result in payments that are likely to be less than 50 percent of billed
charges. Therefore, we believe maintaining our current in-network
payment rate for this service is more competitive than if we were to
implement a new payment rate at 50 percent of the billed charge.
Finally, we will not apply the new payment rates to covered services
furnished under the durable medical equipment benefit, which currently
is provided to enrollees in the federally-
[[Page 30222]]
administered PCIP on an in-network basis only. We believe that the
rates currently paid for durable medical equipment are at least as
competitive as Medicare payment rates.
This interim final rule establishes new payment rates for most
covered services furnished in the federally-administered PCIP. The
federally-administered PCIP is administered directly by HHS. We note
that HHS can implement this interim final rule quickly and efficiently.
The state-based PCIPs have previously indicated to HHS that they are
unable to implement new facility and provider rates quickly. Therefore,
we have taken the contracting strategy outlined herein with state-based
PCIPs.
B. Premiums and Cost-Sharing (Sec. 152.21(c))
Section 1101(c)(2)(D) of the Affordable Care Act requires that a
PCIP program established under this section meet ``any other
requirements determined appropriate'' by the Secretary. We are using
this authority to adopt a new requirement for the federally-
administered PCIP that conditions a facility or provider's acceptance
of the new payment rates discussed above for most covered services on
the facility or provider's agreement not to balance bill the enrollee
for an amount greater than the cost-sharing amount calculated by the
Plan.
Balance billing is a term generally used to describe the practice
of billing a patient for the difference between the plan allowance for
a covered service and the amount that the facility or provider would
otherwise charge for the service. Although the federally-administered
PCIP currently contracts with a network of facilities and providers
that have agreed not to balance bill, it may not be able to sustain
that contractual arrangement as it currently exists, or otherwise enter
into new contracts with networks that will accept as payment in full
the payment rates we are adopting in this interim final rule. Thus, the
federally-administered PCIP may operate without a network for most
covered services, and the corresponding protection against balance
billing that has, to date, been available to enrollees who choose to
use network facilities and providers.
Without such protection, enrollees in the federally-administered
PCIP could become liable to pay significant out-of-pocket costs for
many covered services. We understand that facility and provider charges
will often be higher than the rates we are setting in this interim
final rule. Allowing this financial liability to transfer to the
enrollee could leave federally-administered PCIP enrollees no better
off than they would have been if they had no PCIP coverage, and runs
counter to the entire PCIP concept, which is to provide affordable
health insurance coverage to those who need it most. Also, we believe
that the payment rates we are setting in this interim final rule are
still better than the alternative, which is leaving facilities and
providers with the possibility of having to decide whether to furnish
uncompensated care.
Accordingly, to safeguard federally-administered PCIP enrollees
from experiencing potentially significant increases in their out-of-
pocket costs due to balance billing, we are adding a new Sec.
152.21(c) to our regulations. Beginning with June 15, 2013 dates of
service, this new section requires all facilities and providers that
accept payment from the federally-administered PCIP for furnishing a
covered service to an enrollee (with the exception of covered services
furnished under the prescription drug, organ/tissue transplant,
dialysis and durable medical equipment benefits) to accept as payment
in full the plan allowance for the covered service, which includes the
cost-sharing amount calculated by the Plan for the covered service.
With respect to these covered services, facilities or providers may not
bill the enrollee for an amount greater than the amount determined by
the Plan to be the enrollee's cost-sharing amount for the covered
service.
The prohibition on balance billing will not apply to covered
services furnished under the prescription drug, organ/tissue
transplant, dialysis and durable medical equipment benefits because, as
explained above, covered services furnished under these benefits will
continued to be paid at the existing in-network payment rates. We do
not apply the balance billing prohibition to these covered services
because it is our desire to encourage federally-administered enrollees
to continue to seek treatment for these covered services from in
network facilities and providers for the cost-containment reasons
described above.
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and the 60-Day Delay in the Effective
Date
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551, et
seq.), a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public
comment are generally required before promulgation of a regulation. We
also ordinarily provide a 60-day delay in the effective date of the
provisions of a rule in accordance with the APA (5 U.S.C. 553(d)),
which requires a 30-day delayed effective date and the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801(a)(3)), which requires a 60-day delayed
effective date for major rules.
However, this procedure can be waived if the agency, for good
cause, finds that notice and public comment and delay in effective date
are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest and
incorporates a statement of the finding and its reasons in the rule
issued. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3); 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
HHS has determined that issuing this regulation in proposed form,
such that it would not become effective until after public comments are
submitted, considered, and responded to in a final rule, would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The PCIP program is
intended to provide benefits to eligible uninsured individuals with
pre-existing conditions until 2014. However, the funding available to
pay claims against, and the administrative costs of, the PCIP program
is limited by statute, and HHS estimates that, at the current rate of
expenditure, the aggregate amount needed for the payment of program
expenses may be greater than the amount of remaining funding
appropriated by the Congress to pay such expenses. Moreover, for
individuals with pre-existing conditions enrolled in the PCIP program,
the program may be their only available source of health coverage
before prohibitions on discrimination by health insurance issuers based
on pre-existing conditions go into effect in January 2014. It is
critical to the continued sustainability of the program that the new
payment rates go into effect as soon as operationally possible. A delay
in the implementation of the new reimbursement rates beyond June 15,
2013 would risk program funds being exhausted prior to 2014.
We also believe that it would be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest to delay the implementation of a policy that prohibits
facilities and providers from billing federally-
[[Page 30223]]
administered PCIP enrollees for the difference between the plan
allowance for most covered services and the amount they would otherwise
charge for the covered services. The PCIP program is a program of last
resort for individuals who, because of their pre-existing conditions,
are either denied coverage in the individual market altogether, or can
only obtain coverage that excludes their pre-existing condition (often
at substantially higher premium rates than those paid by other
individuals). The Affordable Care Act not only makes coverage available
to these individuals until the more general pre-existing condition
protections become available in 2014, but does so at a lower cost than
they otherwise would likely have to pay if they did not have health
coverage. Furthermore, if the network currently in place in the
federally-administered PCIP became unavailable as a result of the new
payment rates being set in this interim final rule, we are concerned
that the balance billed charges could cause irreparable financial harm
to enrollees and deter them from seeking services at all. Because we
want not only to preserve the program benefit structure as intended by
the Congress, but also meet the needs of enrollees in the federally-
administered PCIP who expect that their out-of-pocket costs will be
limited, we believe that it would be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest to create a situation in which these enrollees are
either deterred from seeking covered benefits under the program
altogether, or are forced to pay substantially higher out-of-pocket
costs than they would have otherwise had to pay absent our adoption of
a policy prohibiting balance billing in this interim final rule.
For the foregoing reasons, we find good cause to waive the notice
of proposed rulemaking and 60-day delay in the effective date and to
issue this final rule on an interim basis.
We are providing a 60-day public comment period, and this
regulation will be effective on June 15, 2013.
V. Collection of Information Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to
provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public
comment before a collection of information requirement is submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
We are not soliciting public comment on these issues addressed in
this interim final rule because we are not making changes to the
information collections associated with this program, which are covered
under OMB Control Number OMB-0938-1100.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Summary and Need for Regulatory Action
Section 1101 of Title I of the Affordable Care Act requires that
the Secretary establish, either directly or through contracts with
states or nonprofit private entities, a temporary high risk pool
program to provide affordable health insurance benefits to eligible
uninsured individuals with pre-existing conditions. The Affordable Care
Act envisions that this program will provide coverage to eligible
uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions until 2014, when
these individuals will begin to have access to a broader range of
affordable health coverage options, including qualified health plans
offered through new Health Insurance Exchanges established under
sections 1311 or 1321 of the Affordable Care Act. An interim final rule
published July 10, 2010 (75 FR 45014) set forth and addressed key
issues regarding administration of the program, eligibility and
enrollment, benefits, premiums, funding, appeals rules, and enforcement
provisions related to anti-dumping and fraud, waste, and abuse. This
interim final rule sets forth new payment rates that apply to most
covered services with dates of service beginning June 15, 2013, in the
federally-administered PCIP. Payment rates for covered services--with
the exception of covered services furnished under the prescription
drug, organ/tissue transplant, dialysis and durable medical equipment
benefits will be--(1) 100 percent of Medicare payment rates; or (2)
where Medicare payment rates cannot be implemented by the federally-
administered PCIP, 50 percent of billed charges or a rate generated
using a relative value scale pricing methodology. This interim final
rule is an exercise of our authority to make program changes that we
have determined are prudent and necessary to ensure that there is
sufficient funding to pay for program expenses until 2014.
Additionally, to protect federally-administered PCIP enrollees from
potentially becoming financially liable to pay significant costs for
covered services as an unintended consequence of this interim final
rule, we are adopting a policy that prohibits facilities and providers
from billing an enrollee for the difference between the plan allowance
for a covered service (with the exception of covered services furnished
under the prescription drug, organ/tissue transplant, dialysis and
durable medical equipment benefits) and the amount that they would
otherwise charge for the covered service. In other words, facilities
and providers that furnish covered services to federally-administered
PCIP enrollees must accept, as payment in full, the plan allowance for
most of those covered services (as determined by the Plan) and not bill
the enrollee for an amount greater than the cost-sharing amount that
the federally-administered PCIP has calculated for the covered service.
Executive Order 12866 explicitly requires agencies to take account
of ``distributive impacts'' and ``equity.'' Setting the federally-
administered PCIP payment rates applicable to most covered services
with dates of service beginning on June 15, 2013, is prudent and
necessary to ensure the PCIP program continues to provide benefits to
enrolled individuals with pre-existing conditions who cannot obtain
health coverage in the existing insurance market until 2014, when these
individuals will begin to have access to a broader range of coverage
options, including qualified health plans offered through new health
insurance marketplaces established under sections 1311 or 1321 of the
Affordable Care Act. Based on enrollment and claims data, current HHS
estimates indicate that the aggregate amount needed to pay for PCIP
expenses may be greater than the remaining funding appropriated by
Congress to pay for such expenses until coverage under the program ends
in 2014. Therefore, it is critical that we set the new payment rates
and prohibit balance billing under the federally-administered PCIP as
soon as operationally possible so that we can ensure that funding
remains available to provide benefits to PCIP enrollees until 2014 and
enrollees are protected from potentially significant out-of-pocket
costs.
B. Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735), a ``significant''
regulatory action is subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of the Executive Order defines a
``significant regulatory action'' as an action that is likely to result
in a rule-- (1) having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more in any one year, or adversely and materially affecting a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local or tribal governments or
communities (also referred to as ``economically significant''); (2)
creating
[[Page 30224]]
a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfering with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order. OMB has
determined that this regulation is economically significant within the
meaning of section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order, because it is likely
to have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million in at least 1
year. Accordingly, OMB has reviewed this rule pursuant to the Executive
Order.
HHS provides an assessment of the potential costs, benefits, and
transfers associated with this interim final regulation, summarized in
the following table.
Table 1.1-- Accounting Table
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits:
Qualitative: The reduction in per-claim costs paid by the federally-
administered Pre[dash]Existing Condition Insurance Plan will help
to ensure that the PCIP program can continue providing benefits to
current enrollees who were previously denied health coverage due to
their pre-existing condition. Facilities and providers serving
enrollees in the Plan will continue to receive payment for such
care, rather than risk receiving no payment for such care should
they choose to continue treating the enrollee and PCIP program
funding is exhausted prior to 2014.
Costs:
Qualitative: Health care facilities and providers will get paid less
by the Plan for the same covered services, although given the small
number of PCIP enrollees and large amount of uncompensated care
that might otherwise be sought by these enrollees, we estimate this
cost is minimal.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Estimated Number of Affected Entities
This interim final rule sets new payment rates for most covered
services in the federally-administered Pre-Existing Condition Insurance
Plan (PCIP) furnished beginning on June 15, 2013. It also prohibits a
facility or provider from balance billing a federally-administered PCIP
enrollee in most circumstances.
Only facilities and providers furnishing covered services to
federally-administered PCIP enrollees will be affected by the new
payment rates and prohibition on balance billing. Although payment
rates will be reduced, facilities and providers choosing to continue to
furnish covered services to PCIP enrollees will continue to receive
payment, whereas in the absence of PCIP, they might not be able to
continue treating the individuals unless they furnish uncompensated
care. Although the federally-administered PCIP currently includes an
in-network benefit, enrollees are also able to receive treatment out-
of-network, thereby making it difficult to quantify the number of
facilities and providers that will be affected by this interim final
rule.
b. Benefits
A key premise for the establishment of the PCIP program was that
those who are unable to purchase private health insurance coverage due
to a pre-existing condition are potentially disadvantaged as a result
of both poor health and loss of income. We expect that this interim
final regulation will help more than 100,000 current enrollees continue
to receive coverage until 2014. According to the 2009 report entitled
``Financial and Health Burden of Chronic Conditions Grow,'' released by
the Center for Studying Health System Change, about 60 percent of the
uninsured who have chronic conditions delay care or did not fill a
prescription due to cost. Lack of health coverage often leads to
significant medical debt, and uncompensated and expensive care at sites
such as emergency rooms, shifting these costs in the health system to
people with insurance coverage to offset the cost of this uncompensated
care. Given these potential consequences of PCIP enrollees losing
coverage and becoming uninsured prior to the coverage protections that
will go into effect in 2014, this interim final regulation could
generate significant benefits to enrolled individuals, for whom it will
be possible to continue to be enrolled in the PCIP program. Absent this
interim final rule, the PCIP program could exhaust its $5 billion in
appropriated funding before the end of the program in 2014.
The Regulatory Impact Analysis included in the preamble to the 2010
PCIP interim final regulation included a discussion of the PCIP
program's benefit to program-eligible individuals, as compared to the
absence of the program. This interim final rule better ensures the
continued existence of the program until 2014, as an alternative to the
absence of the program during that time period. Therefore, we refer
readers to the discussion of the benefits to program-eligible
individuals that appears in the Regulatory Impact Analysis of the July
30, 2010 interim final regulation (75 FR 45026). These benefits could
take the form of reductions in mortality and morbidity, reductions in
medical expenditure risk, and increases in worker productivity. Each of
these effects is described in that Regulatory Impact Analysis.
c. Costs and Transfers
Under Section 1101 of the Affordable Care Act, HHS is authorized to
disperse $5 billion to pay claims and the administrative costs of the
PCIP program that are in excess of premiums collected from enrollees.
There will be administrative costs associated with this interim
final rule. The federally-administered PCIP claims processing
contractor will incur minimal administrative costs to implement the
payment rates required by this regulation to ensure that its systems
are properly coded to pay the payment rates established under this
interim final rule. This cost will be minimal because the claims
processing contractor has an existing system in place to adjust its
payment rates to reduce the payment rates to the amount specified.
This interim final rule will not increase or decrease costs to the
federal government. The Congress appropriated $5 billion for the PCIP
program, and HHS intends to spend that $5 billion for PCIP-related
costs, although this regulation will change how a portion of the
remaining $5 billion is distributed by spreading funding for the
maximum period of time by setting new payment rates in the federally-
administered PCIP.
With respect to other parties, we lack data with which to quantify
costs associated with this regulation. Setting new payment rates for
most covered services under the federally-administered PCIP program
gives facilities and providers two choices. One choice is to continue
to treat federally-administered PCIP enrollees and accept the payment
rates set by this regulation as payment in full. We acknowledge that
facilities and providers would, in general, be paid less to treat PCIP
enrollees but we believe such cost is minimal (relative to facilities
and providers' annual revenues). In the absence of this regulation,
funding for the PCIP program may be exhausted prior to 2014, causing
enrollees to seek from the same facilities and providers uncompensated
and expensive care. Facilities and providers who furnish covered
services to individuals enrolled in the federally-administered PCIP,
the anticipated reduction in PCIP revenue per claim will not, in the
aggregate, eliminate their overall PCIP revenue.
[[Page 30225]]
The other choice that facilities and providers have is to no longer
treat PCIP enrollees. While we understand that the decision to no
longer treat PCIP enrollees is possible, we believe and are hopeful
that most facilities and providers will accept the new payment rates
established in this interim final rule given the serious health
conditions many federally-administered PCIP enrollees have and the
prospect that such reduced payment is temporary until 2014 when no one
can generally be denied health coverage because of a pre-existing
condition. Facilities or providers who choose to not accept the payment
rates established in this interim final rule could limit a federally-
administered PCIP enrollee's ability to access health care services.
However, this same possibility would occur if the PCIP program were to
end before 2014. Lastly, because the PCIP program serves such a small
population nationwide, and the program is temporary in nature, it is
unlikely that a facility or provider's annual revenue would be
significantly impacted by continuing to treat PCIP enrollees at the new
payment rate. Therefore, we believe that this interim final regulation
has minimal cost to such providers and facilities.
d. Conclusion
Under section 1101 of the Affordable Care Act, HHS is authorized to
spend $5 billion for the purpose of funding the PCIP program.
Implementing this interim final regulation, through which HHS is
setting payment rates for most covered services under the federally-
administered PCIP program to 100 percent of Medicare payment rates, may
not impose any substantial financial costs on any parties.
For facilities and providers, the anticipated reduction in PCIP
revenue per claim will likely be offset by the cost of uncompensated
care in the absence of the PCIP program, a cost that facilities and
providers would frequently incur if the PCIP program terminated earlier
than 2014, due to funds being exhausted. Therefore, this interim final
regulation has, in aggregate, minimal cost to such facilities and
providers. By ensuing that coverage continues through the end of the
year, when new options become available, the payment rates set forth in
this interim final regulation will likely have a significant, positive
financial impact on individuals enrolled in the program.
We anticipate that PCIP enrollees, who might otherwise lose their
PCIP coverage will benefit from this interim final rule because they
will be able to maintain their PCIP coverage. We also anticipate that
ensuring the PCIP program's existence through 2014 will reduce the
burden on local and state governments to pay health care facilities and
providers for uncompensated care and prevent shifting of uncompensated
care costs in the health system to people with insurance coverage to
offset the cost of such uncompensated care.
VII. Other Sections
Regulatory Alternatives
Under the Executive Order, we must consider alternatives to issuing
regulations and alternative regulatory approaches. This interim final
rule sets payment rates for covered services in the federally-
administered PCIP with dates of service beginning June 15, 2013 to
reduce the rate of expenditures in order to eliminate the potential
funding deficit estimated to occur in calendar year 2013. While other
program modifications, as previously summarized, have been implemented
to contain program costs, no other viable alternatives were identified
that could substitute for the changes included in this interim final
rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires agencies that issue a
regulation to analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses
if a rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The RFA generally defines a ``small entity'' as--(1) A
proprietary firm meeting the size standards of the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit organization that is not dominant
in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction with a population
of less than 50,000. States and individuals are not included in the
definition of ``small entity.'' The Secretary certifies that this
interim final rule will not have significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates would require certain spending in any 1
year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation.
In 2013, that threshold is approximately $141 million.
UMRA does not address the total cost of a rule. Rather, it focuses
on certain categories of cost, mainly those ``federal mandate'' costs
resulting from--(1) Imposing enforceable duties on state, local, or
tribal governments, or on the private sector; or (2) increasing the
stringency of conditions in, or decreasing the funding of, state,
local, or tribal governments under entitlement programs.
Under the Affordable Care Act, states (or their designated
nonprofit, private entities) chose to contract with HHS to administer
PCIP and receive federal funding for doing so. If they did not choose
to administer a PCIP, HHS established a PCIP in the state. Thus, this
interim final rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on states.
Enrolled individuals have to pay a premium and other out-of-pocket
expenses to maintain their enrollment in a PCIP. However, individuals
are free to disenroll based on their evaluation of the costs and
benefits of remaining in the program. There is no automatic enrollment
and no requirement to enroll or remain enrolled in a PCIP. Thus, this
interim final rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on the private
sector.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the specific provisions of the Affordable Care Act, States or
State-delegated non-profit entities are contractors of the HHS in the
implementation of the PCIP program. HHS has given those contractors
flexibility within the parameters provided by the Affordable Care Act
and within the budgetary capacity of the program.
Congressional Review Act
This proposed regulation is subject to the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq) and has been transmitted to the Congress and
Comptroller General for review.
V. Statutory Authority
This interim final rule is adopted pursuant to the authority
contained in section 1101 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (Pub. L. 111-148).
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 152
Administrative practice and procedure, Health care, Health
insurance, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Health
and Human Services amends 45 CFR subtitle A, subchapter B, part 152 as
set forth below:
[[Page 30226]]
PART 152--PRE-EXISTING CONDITION INSURANCE PLAN PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 152 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 1101 of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148).
0
2. Section 152.21 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows.
Sec. 152.21 Premiums and cost-sharing.
* * * * *
(c) Prohibition on balance billing in the PCIP administered by HHS.
A facility or provider that accepts payment under Sec. 152.35(c)(2)
for a covered service furnished to an enrollee may not bill the
enrollee for an amount greater than the cost-sharing amount for the
covered service calculated by the PCIP.
0
3. Section 152.35 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows.
Sec. 152.35. Insufficient funds.
* * * * *
(c) Payment rates for covered services furnished beginning June 15,
2013 to enrollees in the PCIP administered by HHS. (1) Covered services
furnished under the prescription drug, organ/tissue transplant,
dialysis and durable medical equipment benefits will be paid at the
payment rates that are in effect on June 15, 2013.
(2) With respect to all other covered services, the payment rates
will be--
(i) 100 percent of Medicare payment rates; or
(ii) Where Medicare payment rates cannot be implemented by the
federally-administered PCIP, 50 percent of billed charges or a rate
using a relative value scale pricing methodology.
Dated: May 15, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Dated: May 16, 2013.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-12145 Filed 5-17-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4150-03-P