Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Broward County, Florida, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area, 29658-29659 [2013-12066]
Download as PDF
29658
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Proposed Rules
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
■ 2. Appendix D to subpart B is
amended by revising the wage area
listing for the St. Clair, IL, NAF wage
areas to read as follows:
*
*
*
Illinois
*
*
*
*
*
St. Clair
Survey Area
*
*
Illinois:
St. Clair
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Illinois:
Madison
Williamson
Indiana:
Vanderburgh
Missouri: (city)
St. Louis
Missouri: (counties)
Jefferson
Pulaski
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–12065 Filed 5–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AM83
Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of
Broward County, Florida, to a
Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage
System Wage Area
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management is issuing a proposed rule
that would define Broward County,
Florida, as an area of application county
to the Miami-Dade, FL, nonappropriated
fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS)
wage area. This change is necessary
because there are three NAF FWS
employees working in Broward County
and the county is not currently defined
to a NAF wage area.
DATES: We must receive comments on or
before June 20, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:19 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘RIN 3206–AM83,’’ using
either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Jeanne Jacobson, Acting Deputy
Associate Director for Pay and Leave,
Employee Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, Room 7H31,
1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC
20415–8200, or email pay-leavepolicy@opm.gov.
ADDRESSES:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
(202) 606–2838, or by email at payleave-policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
is issuing a proposed rule that would
define Broward County, Florida, as an
area of application to the Miami-Dade,
FL, nonappropriated fund (NAF)
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area.
The Broward County VA Outpatient
Clinic in Sunrise, FL, has a new
Veterans Canteen Service staffed with
three NAF FWS employees.
Under section 532.219 of title 5, Code
of Federal Regulations, each NAF wage
area ‘‘shall consist of one or more
survey areas, along with nonsurvey
areas, if any, having nonappropriated
fund employees.’’ Broward County does
not meet the regulatory criteria under 5
CFR 532.219 to be established as a
separate NAF wage area; however,
nonsurvey counties may be combined
with a survey area to form a wage area.
Section 532.219 lists the regulatory
criteria that OPM considers when
defining FWS wage area boundaries:
• Proximity of largest facilities
activity in each county;
• Transportation facilities and
commuting patterns; and
• Similarities of the counties in:
Æ Overall population;
Æ Private employment in major
industry categories; and
Æ Kinds and sizes of private
industrial establishments.
Based on an analysis of the regulatory
criteria for defining NAF wage areas, we
recommend that Broward County, FL,
be defined as an area of application to
the Miami-Dade, FL, NAF FWS wage
area. The proximity criterion,
transportation facilities and commuting
patterns criterion, and the overall
population, employment sizes, and
kinds and sizes of private industrial
establishments criterion all favor the
Miami-Dade wage area. In addition, the
NAF FWS employees in Broward
County work at the Broward County VA
Outpatient Clinic, which is a satellite
activity attached to the Bruce W. Carter
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
VA Medical Center in Miami-Dade
County. Miami-Dade County is the
survey county in the Miami-Dade NAF
wage area. Based on this analysis, we
recommend that Broward County be
defined to the Miami-Dade NAF wage
area.
The proposed Miami-Dade NAF wage
area would consist of one survey
county, Miami-Dade County, FL, and
two area of application counties,
Broward and Palm Beach Counties, FL.
The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee, the national labormanagement committee responsible for
advising OPM on matters concerning
the pay of FWS employees,
recommended this change by
consensus. This change would be
effective on the first day of the first
applicable pay period beginning on or
after 30 days following publication of
the final regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they would affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Elaine Kaplan,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management is amending 5
CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
2. Appendix D to subpart B is
amended by revising the wage area
listing for the Miami-Dade, FL, NAF
wage areas to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
*
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
*
21MYP1
*
Florida
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
Miami-Dade
Survey Area
*
*
Florida:
Miami-Dade
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Florida:
Broward
Palm Beach
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–12066 Filed 5–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 356
[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0086]
RIN 0579–AD50
Forfeiture Procedures Under the
Endangered Species Act and the Lacey
Act Amendments
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is one of the agencies
that administers the provisions of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA), and the Lacey Act
Amendments of 1981, as amended, that
pertain to plants. We are proposing to
update our regulations that set forth our
forfeiture procedures with regard to
plants or plant products seized under
the authority of the ESA and the Lacey
Act. The proposed changes would make
our regulations conform to the
requirements of the Civil Asset
Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000, increase
the monetary threshold of those cases
proceeding through judicial forfeiture,
provide for the assessment of storage
costs of seized property, and make the
regulations easier to understand.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before July 22,
2013.
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2007-00860001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2007–0086, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:19 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
D=APHIS-2007-0086 or in our reading
room, which is located in Room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799–7039 before
coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
John C. Veremis; National CITES
Coordinator; PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 52, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851–2347.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), was passed to prevent the
extinction of native and non-native
animals and plants by providing
measures to help alleviate the loss of
species and their habitats. With certain
exceptions, the ESA prohibits activities
with these protected species unless
authorized by a permit from the U.S.
Department of the Interior’s Fish and
Wildlife Service. The Convention on
International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES, 27 U.S.T. 1087) is implemented
in the United States through the ESA.
CITES is a multinational agreement that
entered into force on July 1, 1975, to
prevent species of wild animals and
plants from becoming endangered or
extinct because of international trade.
The CITES treaty is currently signed by
176 countries. It regulates international
trade in specimens of wild animals and
plants in order to protect against overexploitation. Regulations implementing
CITES for both wildlife and plants have
been promulgated by the Division of
Management Authority located within
the U.S. Department of Interior, Fish
and Wildlife Service. These regulations
are found at 50 CFR parts 13, 17, and
23. The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, as well as
the Office of Law Enforcement of the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the
Department of Interior, enforces those
regulations with regard to plant imports.
Species regulated under CITES are
listed in one of three appendices to
CITES. Species listed in Appendix I are
subject to the most restrictions and
species listed in Appendix III are
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29659
subject to the fewest. Depending upon
the appendix in which the species is
listed, its trade is controlled through the
issuance of various permits or
certificates by the exporting and/or
importing countries’ management
authorities. When a CITES-regulated
species is imported into the United
States, it must be accompanied by the
required permit or certificate. If it is not,
the commodity is subject to seizure by,
and forfeiture to, the U.S. Government.
APHIS, as part of its enforcement work,
initiates, with the assistance of other
agencies, seizures at U.S. ports of entry,
of plants and plant products imported
in violation of CITES. APHIS initiates
approximately 100 seizures each year
for CITES-regulated products imported
without the proper CITES
documentation. Wood, wood products,
medicinal items, and live plants
constitute the bulk of property that has
been seized in the past. The seizures of
these commodities are governed by the
forfeiture regulations currently found in
APHIS’ regulations in 7 CFR part 356,
which are the subject of this proposed
rule.
The current procedures in part 356
also apply to seizures by APHIS
authorized by the Lacey Act
Amendments of 1981, as amended (16
U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) (Lacey Act). The
Lacey Act is the United States’ oldest
wildlife protection statute. It was first
enacted in 1900 and was significantly
amended in 1981. The Lacey Act
combats trafficking in ‘‘illegal’’ wildlife,
fish and plants. The Food, Conservation,
and Energy Act of 2008, effective May
22, 2008, amended the Lacey Act by
expanding its protection to a broader
range of plants and plant products. The
Lacey Act makes it unlawful to import,
export, transport, sell, receive, acquire,
or purchase in interstate or foreign
commerce certain plants taken,
possessed, transported or sold in
violation of the laws of a U.S. State or
any foreign law that protects plants. It
also makes it unlawful to import,
export, transport, sell, receive, acquire
or purchase certain plants taken,
possessed, transported or sold, in
violation of the laws of the United
States or an Indian tribe. The Lacey Act
also makes it unlawful to make or
submit any false record, account, or
label for, or any false identification of,
any plant that has been or is intended
to be moved in interstate or foreign
commerce. Additionally, certain plants
and plant products must be
accompanied at the time of importation
with a declaration providing, in part,
the scientific name of the plant and
where the plant was harvested. The
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29658-29659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12066]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AM83
Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Broward County, Florida,
to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a proposed
rule that would define Broward County, Florida, as an area of
application county to the Miami-Dade, FL, nonappropriated fund (NAF)
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because
there are three NAF FWS employees working in Broward County and the
county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.
DATES: We must receive comments on or before June 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN 3206-AM83,''
using either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Jeanne Jacobson, Acting Deputy Associate Director for Pay and
Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room
7H31, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200, or email pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
(202) 606-2838, or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) is issuing a proposed rule that would define Broward County,
Florida, as an area of application to the Miami-Dade, FL,
nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. The
Broward County VA Outpatient Clinic in Sunrise, FL, has a new Veterans
Canteen Service staffed with three NAF FWS employees.
Under section 532.219 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, each
NAF wage area ``shall consist of one or more survey areas, along with
nonsurvey areas, if any, having nonappropriated fund employees.''
Broward County does not meet the regulatory criteria under 5 CFR
532.219 to be established as a separate NAF wage area; however,
nonsurvey counties may be combined with a survey area to form a wage
area. Section 532.219 lists the regulatory criteria that OPM considers
when defining FWS wage area boundaries:
Proximity of largest facilities activity in each county;
Transportation facilities and commuting patterns; and
Similarities of the counties in:
[cir] Overall population;
[cir] Private employment in major industry categories; and
[cir] Kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.
Based on an analysis of the regulatory criteria for defining NAF
wage areas, we recommend that Broward County, FL, be defined as an area
of application to the Miami-Dade, FL, NAF FWS wage area. The proximity
criterion, transportation facilities and commuting patterns criterion,
and the overall population, employment sizes, and kinds and sizes of
private industrial establishments criterion all favor the Miami-Dade
wage area. In addition, the NAF FWS employees in Broward County work at
the Broward County VA Outpatient Clinic, which is a satellite activity
attached to the Bruce W. Carter VA Medical Center in Miami-Dade County.
Miami-Dade County is the survey county in the Miami-Dade NAF wage area.
Based on this analysis, we recommend that Broward County be defined to
the Miami-Dade NAF wage area.
The proposed Miami-Dade NAF wage area would consist of one survey
county, Miami-Dade County, FL, and two area of application counties,
Broward and Palm Beach Counties, FL. The Federal Prevailing Rate
Advisory Committee, the national labor-management committee responsible
for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees,
recommended this change by consensus. This change would be effective on
the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after
30 days following publication of the final regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
would affect only Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Elaine Kaplan,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is amending 5
CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
0
2. Appendix D to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area listing
for the Miami-Dade, FL, NAF wage areas to read as follows:
* * * * *
* * * * *
Florida
[[Page 29659]]
* * * * *
Miami-Dade
Survey Area
Florida:
Miami-Dade
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Florida:
Broward
Palm Beach
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-12066 Filed 5-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P