New Postal Product, 29784-29785 [2013-12008]
Download as PDF
29784
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Notices
Dated: May 16, 2013.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—www.nrc.gov
Week of May 27, 2013—Tentative
[FR Doc. 2013–12180 Filed 5–17–13; 4:15 pm]
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
10:00 a.m. Briefing on Security Issues
(Closed—Ex. 1)
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
9:00 a.m. Briefing on Results of the
Agency Action Review Meeting
(AARM) (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Rani Franovich, 301–415–1868)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—www.nrc.gov
Week of June 3, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of June 3, 2013.
Week of June 10, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of June 10, 2013.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Week of June 17, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of June 17, 2013.
Week of June 24, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of June 24, 2013.
*
*
*
*
*
* The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—301–415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, 301–415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify
Kimberly Meyer, NRC Disability
Program Manager, at 301–287–0727, or
by email at kimberly.meyerchambers@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
This notice is distributed
electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969),
or send an email to
darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2013–62; Order No. 1716]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing concerning
the addition of Global Expedited
Package Services 3 Contract to the
competitive product list. This notice
informs the public of the filing, invites
public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: May 22,
2013.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Contents of Filing
III. Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
Notice of filing. On May 10, 2013, the
Postal Service filed a notice announcing
that it is entering into an additional
Global Expedited Package Services
(GEPS) 3 contract (Agreement).1 The
Postal Service seeks to have the
Agreement included within the GEPS 3
product on grounds of functional
equivalence to a previously approved
baseline agreement. Id. at 2.
Background. Customers for GEPS
contracts are small- or medium-sized
businesses that mail products directly to
foreign destinations using Express Mail
International, Priority Mail
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
a Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited
Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreement
and Application for Non-Public Treatment of
Materials Filed Under Seal, May 10, 2013 (Notice).
The Notice was filed in accordance with 39 CFR
3015.5. Id. at 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International, or both. Id. at 4. The
Commission added GEPS 1 to the
competitive product list, based on
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, by
operation of Order No. 86. Id. at 1. It
later approved the addition of GEPS 3
contracts to the competitive product list
as a result of Docket No. MC2010–28.2
The Commission designated the
contract filed in companion Docket No.
CP2010–71 as the baseline agreement
for purposes of establishing the
functional equivalency of other
agreements proposed for inclusion
within the GEPS 3 product. Notice at 1–
2.
II. Contents of Filing
The filing includes a Notice, along
with the following attachments:
• Attachment 1—a redacted copy of
the Agreement;
• Attachment 2—a redacted copy of
the certification required under 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2);
• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7; and
• Attachment 4—an application for
non-public treatment of material filed
under seal.
The material filed under seal consists
of unredacted copies of the Agreement
and supporting financial documents. Id.
at 2.
Functional equivalency. The Postal
Service asserts that the instant
Agreement and the baseline agreement
are functionally equivalent because they
share similar cost and market
characteristics. Id. at 3. It notes that the
pricing formula and classification
established in Governors’ Decision No.
08–7 ensure that each GEPS contract
meets the criteria of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and
related regulations. Id. The Postal
Service further asserts that the
functional terms of the two agreements
are the same and the benefits are
comparable. Id.
The Postal Service states that prices
may differ, depending on when an
agreement is signed, due to updated
costing information. Id. at 4. It also
identifies other differences in
contractual terms, but asserts that the
differences do not affect either the
fundamental service being offered or the
fundamental structure of the
Agreement.3 Id. at 6.
Effective date; term. The Postal
Service will inform its contracting
2 See Docket Nos. MC2010–28 and CP2010–71,
Order No. 503, Order Approving Global Expedited
Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreement,
July 29, 2010.
3 The list includes, among other things, deletion
of an article that appears in the baseline agreement,
the addition and revision of articles, the addition
of an annex, and related renumbering of articles.
See id. at 4–6.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2013 / Notices
partner of the effective date of the
Agreement via notice provided as soon
as possible, but no later than, 30 days
after receiving all necessary regulatory
approvals. Id. Attachment 1 at 7. The
Agreement is to remain in effect for one
calendar year, unless terminated sooner.
Id.
III. Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2013–62 for consideration of
matters raised in the Notice. Interested
persons may submit comments on
whether the Agreement is consistent
with the requirements of 39 CFR 3015.5
and the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632 and
3633. Comments are due no later than
May 22, 2013. The public portions of
the Postal Service’s filing can be
accessed via the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.prc.gov. Information on
how to obtain access to nonpublic
material appears at 39 CFR 3007.40.
The Commission appoints James F.
Callow to represent the interest of the
general public (Public Representative)
in this case.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2013–62 for consideration of
matters raised in the Postal Service’s
Notice.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission designates James F. Callow
to serve as an officer of the Commission
(Public Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
3. Comments are due no later than
May 22, 2013.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this Order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–12008 Filed 5–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. R2013–7; Order No. 1714]
Priority Mail Pricing
Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service notice
announcing a proposal to include, for
no additional charge, insurance up to
$100 on most Priority Mail pieces. This
notice addresses procedural steps
associated with this filing.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
Submit comments
electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing
Online’’ link in the banner at the top of
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing
the Commission’s Filing Online system
at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as the source for case-related
information for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
DATES: Comments are due: May 30,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820 (case-related
information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov
(electronic filing assistance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. Administrative Actions
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Overview
On May 10, 2013, the Postal Service
filed notice, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3622
and 39 CFR 3010, announcing a plan to
automatically include, at no additional
charge, $50 or $100 of insurance
coverage with most Priority Mail
pieces.1 The price change is scheduled
to take effect July 28, 2013.
Price adjustment description.
Currently, the Postal Service charges
Priority Mail users a fee of $1.95 for
insurance coverage up to $50 and $2.45
for insurance coverage between $50.01
and $100. Notice at 2. The Postal
Service’s principal domestic
competitors, FedEx and UPS, include
insurance coverage up to $100 at no
extra charge. Id. The Postal Service
asserts that this provides a competitive
advantage with shippers, particularly
large volume shippers. Id. By offering
insurance coverage up to $100, for no
additional charge, on most Priority Mail
pieces, the Postal Service hopes to
improve the competitiveness of Priority
Mail and potentially grow its overall
market share. Id.
The Postal Service plans to offer
automatic insurance coverage up to
$100 for no extra charge on all domestic
Priority Mail pieces that bear an
Intelligent Mail package barcode (IMpb)
and for which the mailer pays
Commercial Plus prices or uses a
‘‘Qualifying Payment Method.’’ 2 The
1 United States Postal Service Notice of MarketDominant Price Adjustment, May 10, 2013 (Notice).
2 Qualifying Payment Methods are limited to
ePostage, Electronic Verification System (eVS),
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29785
Postal Service plans to offer automatic
insurance coverage up to $50 in value
on all other domestic Priority Mail
pieces that bear an IMpb or other USPS
retail tracking barcode.3 Id. at 2–3.
Price cap compliance. For the Special
Services class of mail, the Postal Service
states that it has inflation-based price
adjustment authority of 1.053 percent 4
and unused price adjustment authority
of 2.114 percent,5 neither of which the
Postal Service intends to utilize in this
docket. Id. at 3–4. The Postal Service
indicates that by eliminating the fees for
the first $100 (or $50) of insurance
coverage for most Priority Mail pieces,
the prices for Special Services class will
decrease by 0.452 percent. Id. at 5. The
Postal Service indicates that after the
price change, the unused pricing
authority available for the Special
Services class will be 3.619. Id.
Workshare discounts and preferred
rates. The Postal Service asserts the
price change does not affect workshare
discounts. Id. at 7. Apart from basing
the amount of automatic insurance on
the mailer’s use of certain postage
payment methods, the Postal Service
asserts that the price change does not
exclude any mailers and will therefore
not affect compliance with any
preferred rate requirements. Id.
Mail Classification Schedule (MCS).
Proposed changes to the MCS, which
describe the price change, appear in
Attachment A of the Postal Service’s
Notice.
II. Administrative Actions
Initiation of proceedings. The
Commission hereby establishes Docket
No. R2013–7, to review the Postal
Service’s planned price adjustment. The
Postal Service’s Notice and any
subsequent filings in this docket will be
posted to the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.prc.gov.
Public comment period. The
Commission’s rules provide a period of
20 days from the date of the Postal
Service’s filing for public comment. 39
CFR 3010.13(a)(5). Comments by
interested persons are due no later than
May 30, 2013.
Appointment of Public
Representative. In conformance with 39
U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints
Hardcopy Manifest, or an approved Manifest
Mailing System. Id. at 3 n.2.
3 Automatic insurance coverage will not be
offered with Priority Mail pieces sent using
Merchandise Return Service, Priority Mail Open
and Distribute, or Premium Forwarding Service. Id.
at 3 n.3.
4 This is based on the Consumer Price Index–All
Urban Consumers, U.S. All Items (the
‘‘CUUR0000SA0’’ series). Id. at 3.
5 See Docket No. R2013–1, Order No. 1541
(November 16, 2012), at 72.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29784-29785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12008]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2013-62; Order No. 1716]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing
concerning the addition of Global Expedited Package Services 3 Contract
to the competitive product list. This notice informs the public of the
filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: May 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Contents of Filing
III. Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
Notice of filing. On May 10, 2013, the Postal Service filed a
notice announcing that it is entering into an additional Global
Expedited Package Services (GEPS) 3 contract (Agreement).\1\ The Postal
Service seeks to have the Agreement included within the GEPS 3 product
on grounds of functional equivalence to a previously approved baseline
agreement. Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing a
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package Services 3
Negotiated Service Agreement and Application for Non-Public
Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal, May 10, 2013 (Notice). The
Notice was filed in accordance with 39 CFR 3015.5. Id. at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background. Customers for GEPS contracts are small- or medium-sized
businesses that mail products directly to foreign destinations using
Express Mail International, Priority Mail International, or both. Id.
at 4. The Commission added GEPS 1 to the competitive product list,
based on Governors' Decision No. 08-7, by operation of Order No. 86.
Id. at 1. It later approved the addition of GEPS 3 contracts to the
competitive product list as a result of Docket No. MC2010-28.\2\ The
Commission designated the contract filed in companion Docket No.
CP2010-71 as the baseline agreement for purposes of establishing the
functional equivalency of other agreements proposed for inclusion
within the GEPS 3 product. Notice at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Docket Nos. MC2010-28 and CP2010-71, Order No. 503,
Order Approving Global Expedited Package Services 3 Negotiated
Service Agreement, July 29, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Contents of Filing
The filing includes a Notice, along with the following attachments:
Attachment 1--a redacted copy of the Agreement;
Attachment 2--a redacted copy of the certification
required under 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2);
Attachment 3--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No.
08-7; and
Attachment 4--an application for non-public treatment of
material filed under seal.
The material filed under seal consists of unredacted copies of the
Agreement and supporting financial documents. Id. at 2.
Functional equivalency. The Postal Service asserts that the instant
Agreement and the baseline agreement are functionally equivalent
because they share similar cost and market characteristics. Id. at 3.
It notes that the pricing formula and classification established in
Governors' Decision No. 08-7 ensure that each GEPS contract meets the
criteria of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and related regulations. Id. The Postal
Service further asserts that the functional terms of the two agreements
are the same and the benefits are comparable. Id.
The Postal Service states that prices may differ, depending on when
an agreement is signed, due to updated costing information. Id. at 4.
It also identifies other differences in contractual terms, but asserts
that the differences do not affect either the fundamental service being
offered or the fundamental structure of the Agreement.\3\ Id. at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The list includes, among other things, deletion of an
article that appears in the baseline agreement, the addition and
revision of articles, the addition of an annex, and related
renumbering of articles. See id. at 4-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective date; term. The Postal Service will inform its
contracting
[[Page 29785]]
partner of the effective date of the Agreement via notice provided as
soon as possible, but no later than, 30 days after receiving all
necessary regulatory approvals. Id. Attachment 1 at 7. The Agreement is
to remain in effect for one calendar year, unless terminated sooner.
Id.
III. Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013-62 for consideration
of matters raised in the Notice. Interested persons may submit comments
on whether the Agreement is consistent with the requirements of 39 CFR
3015.5 and the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632 and 3633. Comments are due no
later than May 22, 2013. The public portions of the Postal Service's
filing can be accessed via the Commission's Web site at https://www.prc.gov. Information on how to obtain access to nonpublic material
appears at 39 CFR 3007.40.
The Commission appoints James F. Callow to represent the interest
of the general public (Public Representative) in this case.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013-62 for
consideration of matters raised in the Postal Service's Notice.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission designates James F.
Callow to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative)
to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding.
3. Comments are due no later than May 22, 2013.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this Order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-12008 Filed 5-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P