Public Safety Officers' Benefits Program, 29233-29234 [2013-11872]
Download as PDF
29233
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 97
Monday, May 20, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 32
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits
Program
AGENCY:
Federal Rulemaking Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Office of Justice Programs,
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
This order will amend
regulations to revise delegations of
authority for the review process for
determinations regarding claims for
benefits under the Public Safety
Officers’ Benefits Program. The changes
to the regulations are designed to
increase efficiency, reduce duplication,
and streamline the processing of claims.
DATES: This rule takes effect on May 20,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hope Janke, Director, Public Safety
Officers’ Benefits Program, Bureau of
Justice Assistance, Office of Justice
Programs, U.S. Department of Justice,
810 7th Street NW., Washington, DC
20531; telephone: (202) 307–2858.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits (PSOB)
program provides death benefits,
disability benefits, and educational
assistance benefits to eligible public
safety officers or their families when a
death or disability occurs in the line of
duty. The program, authorized and
established by the PSOB Act in 1976,
was designed to offer peace of mind to
men and women seeking careers as
public safety officers and to make a
strong statement about the value that the
nation places on their commitment to
serve their communities in potentially
dangerous circumstances. The Office of
Justice Programs and Bureau of Justice
Assistance (BJA) are engaged in ongoing
efforts to improve the performance of
the PSOB program including an entirely
paperless electronic case management
system in order to improve the
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 May 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
efficiency of claims processing.
Additionally, BJA is ready to launch an
effort to revise their claims process and
streamline the documentation required
of claimants. This rule represents one
aspect of the streamlining efforts.
Having the legal review function
handled by the Department component
authorized to administer the PSOB
program will maintain that critical
function while simplifying the claims
administration process, eliminating
duplicative efforts across components,
and increasing overall programmatic
efficiency.
This rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review. The Department of Justice has
determined that this is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and that it
relates to a matter of agency
organization, management, or
personnel. See Executive Order 12866,
3(d)(3). Accordingly, this rule has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
B. Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, the Attorney General has
determined that this rule will not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform.
D. Administrative Procedure Act
This rule concerns matters relating to
‘‘grants, benefits, or contracts,’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2), and also relates to matters of
agency management or personnel, and is
therefore exempt from the usual
requirements of prior notice and
comment and a 30-day delay in the
effective date. See also 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., does not apply
because this rule is a rule of agency
organization, procedure, and practice
and therefore is not subject to noticeand-comment rulemaking requirements.
Id. 553(b)(A).
F. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. It
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 32
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Education, Emergency medical services,
Firefighters, Law enforcement officers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rescue squad.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, part 32 of title 28 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 32—PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS’
DEATH, DISABILITY, AND
EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE BENEFIT
CLAIMS
1. The authority citation for part 32
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
29234
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. ch. 46, subch. XII; 42
U.S.C. 3782(a), 3787, 3788, 3791(a),
3793(a)(4) &(b), 3795a, 3796c–1, 3796c–2;
sec. 1601, title XI, Public Law 90–351, 82
Stat. 239; secs. 4 through 6, Public Law 94–
430, 90 Stat. 1348; secs. 1 and 2, Public Law
107–37, 115 Stat. 219.
2. In § 32.3, the definition for ‘‘PSOB
Office’’ is revised to read as follows:
■
§ 32.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
PSOB Office means the unit of BJA
that directly administers the Public
Safety Officers’ Benefits program.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 32.43
[Amended]
3. In § 32.43, remove paragraph (e).
■ 4. In § 32.44, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
■
§ 32.44
Hearing Officer determination.
(a) Upon his determining a claim, the
Hearing Officer shall file a notice of the
same simultaneously with the Director
(for his review under subpart F of this
part in the event of approval) and the
PSOB Office, which notice shall specify
the factual findings and legal
conclusions that support it.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 9, 2013.
Mary Lou Leary,
Acting Assistant Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2013–11872 Filed 5–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[CFDA Number: 84.133B–7]
Final Priority; National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation
Research—Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Program—Rehabilitation
Research Training Centers
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services announces a priority for a
Rehabilitation Research Training Center
(RRTC) on Disability Statistics and
Demographics under the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers program administered by the
National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). The
Assistant Secretary may use this priority
for a competition in fiscal year (FY)
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 May 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
2013 and later years. We take this action
to focus research attention on areas of
national need. We intend to use this
priority to improve outcomes for
individuals with disabilities.
DATES: Effective Date: This priority is
effective June 19, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 5133, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2700.
Telephone: (202) 245–7532 or by email:
marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of final priority is in concert with
NIDRR’s Long-Range Plan for Fiscal
Years 2013–2017 (Plan). The Plan,
which was published in the Federal
Register on April 4, 2013 (78 FR 20299),
can be accessed on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-04-04/html/201307879.htm.
Through the implementation of the
Plan, NIDRR seeks to improve the health
and functioning, employment, and
community living and participation of
individuals with disabilities through
comprehensive programs of research,
engineering, training, technical
assistance, and knowledge translation
and dissemination. The Plan reflects
NIDRR’s commitment to quality,
relevance, and balance in its programs
to ensure that appropriate attention is
paid to all aspects of the well-being of
individuals with disabilities and to all
types and degrees of disability,
including individuals with low
incidence and severe disabilities.
This notice announces a priority that
NIDRR intends to use for an RRTC
competition in FY 2013 and possibly
later years. However, nothing precludes
NIDRR from publishing additional
priorities, if needed. Furthermore,
NIDRR is under no obligation to make
an award for this priority. The decision
to make an award will be based on the
quality of applications received and
available funding.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
is to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities, to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technologies that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation
Act).
Rehabilitation Research and Training
Centers (RRTCs)
The purpose of the RRTCs, which are
funded through the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Program, is to achieve the goals
of, and improve the effectiveness of,
services authorized under the
Rehabilitation Act through advanced
research, training, technical assistance,
and dissemination activities in general
problem areas, as specified by NIDRR.
These activities are designed to benefit
rehabilitation service providers,
individuals with disabilities, and the
family members or other authorized
representatives of individuals with
disabilities. Additional information on
the RRTC program can be found at:
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#RRTC.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and
764(b)(2).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed
priority (NPP) for this program in the
Federal Register on February 21, 2013
(78 FR 12002). That notice contained
background information and our reasons
for proposing the priority.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the NPP, nine parties
submitted comments on the proposed
priority.
Generally, we do not address
technical and other minor changes.
Analysis of Comments and Changes:
An analysis of the comments and of any
changes in the priority since publication
of the notice of proposed priority
follows.
Comment: One set of commenters
recommended that NIDRR include an
additional requirement that the RRTC
collect and analyze market-oriented
information about the use of assistive
and accessible technologies by
individuals with disabilities. These
commenters noted that such
information would provide technology
developers, service providers, and other
stakeholders with information about the
number of users of specific assistive
technology products or the size of the
potential market for specific technology
accessibility features. The commenters
suggested that the RRTC be required to
collect and analyze data on the number
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 97 (Monday, May 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29233-29234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11872]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2013 / Rules and
Regulations
[[Page 29233]]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 32
Public Safety Officers' Benefits Program
AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This order will amend regulations to revise delegations of
authority for the review process for determinations regarding claims
for benefits under the Public Safety Officers' Benefits Program. The
changes to the regulations are designed to increase efficiency, reduce
duplication, and streamline the processing of claims.
DATES: This rule takes effect on May 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hope Janke, Director, Public Safety
Officers' Benefits Program, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of
Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 810 7th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20531; telephone: (202) 307-2858.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Safety Officers' Benefits (PSOB)
program provides death benefits, disability benefits, and educational
assistance benefits to eligible public safety officers or their
families when a death or disability occurs in the line of duty. The
program, authorized and established by the PSOB Act in 1976, was
designed to offer peace of mind to men and women seeking careers as
public safety officers and to make a strong statement about the value
that the nation places on their commitment to serve their communities
in potentially dangerous circumstances. The Office of Justice Programs
and Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) are engaged in ongoing efforts
to improve the performance of the PSOB program including an entirely
paperless electronic case management system in order to improve the
efficiency of claims processing. Additionally, BJA is ready to launch
an effort to revise their claims process and streamline the
documentation required of claimants. This rule represents one aspect of
the streamlining efforts. Having the legal review function handled by
the Department component authorized to administer the PSOB program will
maintain that critical function while simplifying the claims
administration process, eliminating duplicative efforts across
components, and increasing overall programmatic efficiency.
Federal Rulemaking Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
This rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. The Department
of Justice has determined that this is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and that it
relates to a matter of agency organization, management, or personnel.
See Executive Order 12866, 3(d)(3). Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
B. Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the federal Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, the Attorney General has determined that this
rule will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform.
D. Administrative Procedure Act
This rule concerns matters relating to ``grants, benefits, or
contracts,'' 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), and also relates to matters of agency
management or personnel, and is therefore exempt from the usual
requirements of prior notice and comment and a 30-day delay in the
effective date. See also 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., does not
apply because this rule is a rule of agency organization, procedure,
and practice and therefore is not subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking requirements. Id. 553(b)(A).
F. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C.
804. It will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 32
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Education, Emergency medical services, Firefighters, Law enforcement
officers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rescue squad.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 32 of
title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 32--PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS' DEATH, DISABILITY, AND EDUCATIONAL
ASSISTANCE BENEFIT CLAIMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 32 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 29234]]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. ch. 46, subch. XII; 42 U.S.C. 3782(a),
3787, 3788, 3791(a), 3793(a)(4) &(b), 3795a, 3796c-1, 3796c-2; sec.
1601, title XI, Public Law 90-351, 82 Stat. 239; secs. 4 through 6,
Public Law 94-430, 90 Stat. 1348; secs. 1 and 2, Public Law 107-37,
115 Stat. 219.
0
2. In Sec. 32.3, the definition for ``PSOB Office'' is revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 32.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
PSOB Office means the unit of BJA that directly administers the
Public Safety Officers' Benefits program.
* * * * *
Sec. 32.43 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 32.43, remove paragraph (e).
0
4. In Sec. 32.44, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 32.44 Hearing Officer determination.
(a) Upon his determining a claim, the Hearing Officer shall file a
notice of the same simultaneously with the Director (for his review
under subpart F of this part in the event of approval) and the PSOB
Office, which notice shall specify the factual findings and legal
conclusions that support it.
* * * * *
Dated: May 9, 2013.
Mary Lou Leary,
Acting Assistant Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2013-11872 Filed 5-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P