Safety Zone; Big Bay Boom, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, 29289-29292 [2013-11751]
Download as PDF
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) In addition to complying with the
Appendix of ASTM F833–13, comply
with the following:
(i) XI.18 Rationale for 7.18: A 3 year
old child’s sitting shoulder height is 15
inches and upper limb length is 19
inches based on 95th percentile 3-year
old child’s measurements (Pheasant,
S.T. (1996). Bodyspace:
Anthropometrics, Ergonomics and the
Design of Work (2nd ed.). London, UK:
Taylor & Francis). The access zone
covers a child sitting in the most upright
position reaching forward hence the
reason for defining 19″ from the seat
back junction.
(ii) [Reserved]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 May 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
Dated: May 10, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–11638 Filed 5–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
PO 00000
29289
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0059]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Big Bay Boom, San Diego
Bay, San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish four temporary safety zones
upon the navigable waters of San Diego
SUMMARY:
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20MYP1.SGM
20MYP1
EP20MY13.001
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
29290
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Bay for the Port of San Diego Big Bay
Boom Fireworks display from 8:45 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013. These
proposed safety zones are necessary to
provide for the safety of the crew,
spectators, and other users and vessels
of the waterway. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within these
temporary safety zones during,
immediately before and after the
fireworks event unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 19, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
June 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant John Bannon, Chief of
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619)
278–7261, email
John.E.Bannon@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 May 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0059] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0059) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Ports and Waterways Safety Act
gives the Coast Guard authority to create
and enforce safety zones. The Coast
Guard is proposing four temporary
safety zones on the navigable waters of
the San Diego Bay for the Port of San
Diego Big Bay Boom Independence Day
Fireworks Display. The safety zones will
include all navigable waters within
1,000 feet of each tug and barge. The
tugs and barges will be located in the
following approximate positions:
Shelter Island Barge: 32°42.8′ N,
117°13.2′ W
Harbor Island Barge: 32°43.3′ N,
117°12.0′ W
Embarcadero Barge: 32°42.9′ N,
117°10.8′ W
Seaport Village Barge: 32°42.2′ N,
117°10.0′ W
These temporary safety zones are
necessary to provide for the safety of the
fireworks barge crew and participating
safety vessels, recreational boating
spectators, and other users of the
waterway from hazards associated with
fireworks. Fireworks launched in close
proximity to watercraft pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. Such displays draw large
numbers of spectators on vessels. The
combination of a large number of
spectators, congested waterways,
darkness punctuated by bright flashes of
light and burning debris has the
potential to result in serious injuries or
fatalities. The proposed safety zones
will restrict vessels from operating
within a portion of the navigable waters
around the fireworks launch platforms
during the enforcement period which
will be immediately before, during, and
immediately after the fireworks
displays.
E:\FR\FM\20MYP1.SGM
20MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
temporary safety zones that would be
enforced from 8:45 p.m. until 10 p.m. on
July 4, 2013. These proposed safety
zones are necessary to provide for the
safety of the crews, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users
of the waterway. Persons and vessels
would be prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative. The proposed temporary
safety zones would include a portion of
waters in the San Diego Bay. Before the
effective period, the Coast Guard will
publish a Coast Guard District Eleven
Local Notice to Mariners information on
the event and associated safety zones.
Immediately before and during the
fireworks display, Coast Guard Sector
San Diego Joint Harbor Operations
Center will issues Broadcast Notice to
Mariners on the location and
enforcement of the safety zones.
Vessels will be able to transit the
surrounding area and may be authorized
to transit through the proposed safety
zones with the permission of the
Captain of the Port or the designated
representative. Before activating the
zones, the Coast Guard will notify
mariners by appropriate means
including but not limited to Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This determination is based on
the size, duration and location of the
safety zones. The safety zones are
relatively small in size, less than half a
mile across, and short in duration, 75
minutes long. Although the safety zones
would apply to multiple parts of San
Diego Bay, traffic would be allowed to
pass through the zone with the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 May 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
permission of the Captain of the Port.
Additionally, before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a
Local Notice to Mariners.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
rule will affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities:
the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the
impacted portions of San Diego Bay, CA
from 8:45 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4,
2013.
These safety zones will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. The safety zones
are relatively small in size, less than
half a mile across, and short in duration,
75 minutes long. Although the safety
zone would apply to multiple safety
zones around the bay, traffic would be
allowed to pass through the zones with
the permission of the Coast Guard patrol
commander. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will publish a Local
Notice to Mariners.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29291
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
E:\FR\FM\20MYP1.SGM
20MYP1
29292
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary
safety zone. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 May 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–563 to read as
follows:
■
Dated: May 2, 2013.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2013–11751 Filed 5–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
§ 165.T11–563 Safety zone; Big Bay Boom;
San Diego, CA.
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0904, FRL–9815–3]
(a) Location. This rule establishes four
temporary safety zones, encompassing
all navigable waters of San Diego Bay
within a 1000-foot radius of fireworks
launching points:
Shelter Island Barge: 32°42.8′ N,
117°13.2′ W
Harbor Island Barge: 32°43.3′ N,
117°12.0′ W
Embarcadero Barge: 32°42.9′ N,
117°10.8′ W
Seaport Village Barge: 32°42.2′ N,
117°10.0′ W
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:45 p.m. to 10
p.m. on July 4, 2013. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a
Local Notice to Mariners (LNM). If the
event concludes prior to the scheduled
termination time, the Captain of the Port
will cease enforcement of this safety
zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and
local, state, and federal law enforcement
vessels who have been authorized to act
on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners can request permission to
transit through the safety zone from the
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander can be contacted on VHF–
FM channels 16 and 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Partial Approval and Partial
Disapproval of Air Quality State
Implementation Plans; Arizona;
Regional Haze Requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
in part and disapprove in part revisions
to Arizona’s State Implementation Plan
(SIP) for its regional haze program based
on our evaluation of its supplemental
submittal dated May 3, 2013. The State’s
new submittal revises Arizona’s SIP that
was submitted on February 28, 2011.
The new revisions are in response to
EPA’s proposed rule published in the
Federal Register on December 21, 2012.
Specifically, we propose to approve
Arizona’s most recent emissions
inventory for 2008, the reasonable
progress analysis of coarse mass and
fine soils, and aspects of the analyses
and determinations of Best Available
Retrofit Technology (BART) controls for
four sources. These sources are
Freeport-McMoRan Incorporated
(FMMI) Miami Smelter, American
Smelting and Refining Company
(ASARCO) Hayden Smelter, Catalyst
Paper, and Arizona Electric Power
Cooperative (AEPCO) Apache
Generating Station. However, we are
proposing to disapprove other revisions
to the reasonable progress analysis and
some aspects of the revised BART
analyses and determinations. We
describe in today’s action the major
elements of the State’s new SIP
submittal and our assessment in terms
of why we are proposing to approve or
disapprove these revised elements.
Today’s action does not address any
other parts of Arizona’s SIP. Regional
haze is caused by emissions of air
pollutants from numerous sources
located over a broad geographic area.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states
to adopt and submit to EPA SIPs that
assure reasonable progress toward the
national goal of achieving natural
visibility conditions by 2064 in 156
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20MYP1.SGM
20MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 97 (Monday, May 20, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29289-29292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11751]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0059]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Big Bay Boom, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish four temporary safety
zones upon the navigable waters of San Diego
[[Page 29290]]
Bay for the Port of San Diego Big Bay Boom Fireworks display from 8:45
p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013. These proposed safety zones are
necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators, and other
users and vessels of the waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within these
temporary safety zones during, immediately before and after the
fireworks event unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 19, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant John Bannon, Chief of Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619) 278-7261, email
John.E.Bannon@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2013-0059] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0059) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Ports and Waterways Safety Act gives the Coast Guard authority
to create and enforce safety zones. The Coast Guard is proposing four
temporary safety zones on the navigable waters of the San Diego Bay for
the Port of San Diego Big Bay Boom Independence Day Fireworks Display.
The safety zones will include all navigable waters within 1,000 feet of
each tug and barge. The tugs and barges will be located in the
following approximate positions:
Shelter Island Barge: 32[deg]42.8' N, 117[deg]13.2' W
Harbor Island Barge: 32[deg]43.3' N, 117[deg]12.0' W
Embarcadero Barge: 32[deg]42.9' N, 117[deg]10.8' W
Seaport Village Barge: 32[deg]42.2' N, 117[deg]10.0' W
These temporary safety zones are necessary to provide for the safety of
the fireworks barge crew and participating safety vessels, recreational
boating spectators, and other users of the waterway from hazards
associated with fireworks. Fireworks launched in close proximity to
watercraft pose a significant risk to public safety and property. Such
displays draw large numbers of spectators on vessels. The combination
of a large number of spectators, congested waterways, darkness
punctuated by bright flashes of light and burning debris has the
potential to result in serious injuries or fatalities. The proposed
safety zones will restrict vessels from operating within a portion of
the navigable waters around the fireworks launch platforms during the
enforcement period which will be immediately before, during, and
immediately after the fireworks displays.
[[Page 29291]]
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary safety zones that
would be enforced from 8:45 p.m. until 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013. These
proposed safety zones are necessary to provide for the safety of the
crews, spectators, participants, and other vessels and users of the
waterway. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative. The proposed temporary safety zones would include a
portion of waters in the San Diego Bay. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will publish a Coast Guard District Eleven Local Notice
to Mariners information on the event and associated safety zones.
Immediately before and during the fireworks display, Coast Guard Sector
San Diego Joint Harbor Operations Center will issues Broadcast Notice
to Mariners on the location and enforcement of the safety zones.
Vessels will be able to transit the surrounding area and may be
authorized to transit through the proposed safety zones with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
Before activating the zones, the Coast Guard will notify mariners by
appropriate means including but not limited to Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This determination is
based on the size, duration and location of the safety zones. The
safety zones are relatively small in size, less than half a mile
across, and short in duration, 75 minutes long. Although the safety
zones would apply to multiple parts of San Diego Bay, traffic would be
allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of the Captain of
the Port. Additionally, before the effective period, the Coast Guard
will publish a Local Notice to Mariners.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This proposed rule will affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in the impacted portions of San
Diego Bay, CA from 8:45 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013.
These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. The
safety zones are relatively small in size, less than half a mile
across, and short in duration, 75 minutes long. Although the safety
zone would apply to multiple safety zones around the bay, traffic would
be allowed to pass through the zones with the permission of the Coast
Guard patrol commander. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard
will publish a Local Notice to Mariners.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
[[Page 29292]]
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing a temporary safety zone. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-563 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-563 Safety zone; Big Bay Boom; San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. This rule establishes four temporary safety zones,
encompassing all navigable waters of San Diego Bay within a 1000-foot
radius of fireworks launching points:
Shelter Island Barge: 32[deg]42.8' N, 117[deg]13.2' W
Harbor Island Barge: 32[deg]43.3' N, 117[deg]12.0' W
Embarcadero Barge: 32[deg]42.9' N, 117[deg]10.8' W
Seaport Village Barge: 32[deg]42.2' N, 117[deg]10.0' W
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:45
p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013. Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM). If the event
concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the
Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated representative.
(2) Mariners can request permission to transit through the safety
zone from the Patrol Commander. The Patrol Commander can be contacted
on VHF-FM channels 16 and 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
Dated: May 2, 2013.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2013-11751 Filed 5-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P