Quartzsite Solar Energy Project Record of Decision (DOE/EIS-0440), 28841-28842 [2013-11696]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Notices
Docket No. ER13–1227, Midwest
Independent Transmission System
Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER13–1317, Entergy
Services, Inc.
These meetings are open to the
public.
For more information, contact Patrick
Clarey, Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission at (317) 249–5937 or
patrick.clarey@ferc.gov.
Dated: May 10, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–11656 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Quartzsite Solar Energy Project
Record of Decision (DOE/EIS–0440)
Western Area Power
Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
Western Area Power
Administration (Western), an agency
within the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), received a request from
Quartzsite Solar Energy, LLC (QSE) to
interconnect its proposed Quartzsite
Solar Energy Project (Project) to
Western’s Bouse-Kofa 161-kilovolt (kV)
transmission line. The proposed Project
site is in an undeveloped area in La Paz
County, Arizona, east of State Route
(SR) 95, approximately 10 miles north of
Quartzsite, Arizona, on lands
administered by the U.S. Department of
Interior, Bureau of Land Management
(BLM).
On December 21, 2012, the Notice of
Availability of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) and Yuma Field
Office (Yuma) Proposed Resource
Management Plan Amendment
(PRMPA) for Quartzsite Solar Energy
Project was published in the Federal
Register (77 FR 75632). After
considering the environmental impacts,
Western has decided to allow QSE’s
request for interconnection to Western’s
transmission system on the Bouse-Kofa
161-kV transmission line and to
construct, own, and operate a new
switchyard and its associated
communication pathway.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, please contact Ms.
Liana Reilly, Environmental Project
Manager, Corporate Services Office,
Western Area Power Administration,
A7400, P.O. Box 281213, Lakewood, CO
80228, telephone (720) 962–7253, fax
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 May 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
(720) 962–7263, or email:
reilly@wapa.gov. For general
information on DOE’s National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) review process, please contact
Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of
NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC–54,
U.S. Department of Energy, Washington,
DC 20585, telephone (202) 586–4600 or
(800) 472–2756.
Western is
a Federal agency under the DOE that
markets and transmits wholesale
electrical power through an integrated
17,000-circuit mile, high-voltage
transmission system across 15 western
states. Western’s Open Access
Transmission Service Tariff (Tariff)
provides open access to its electric
transmission system. In reviewing
interconnection requests, Western must
ensure that existing reliability and
service is not degraded. Western’s Large
Generator Interconnection Procedures
provide for transmission and system
studies to ensure that system reliability
and service to existing customers are not
adversely affected by new
interconnections.
In compliance with the NEPA, as
amended, and the Federal Land Policy
and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, Western as lead agency, with
the BLM as a cooperating agency,
prepared and released the Draft EIS/
PRMPA on November 10, 2011, and
subsequently held public hearings on
the document in Yuma, Arizona, on
December 13, 2011, and in Quartzsite,
Arizona, on December 14, 2011.
Following the release of the Draft EIS/
PRMPA, Western and the BLM prepared
a Final EIS/PRMPA which was released
on December 21, 2012 (77 FR 76477).1
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the
U.S. Army Garrison-Yuma Proving
Ground, the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality and the Arizona
Game and Fish Department (AZGFD)
were also cooperating agencies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Federal Action
Western’s proposed Federal action is
to interconnect the proposed Project to
Western’s transmission system at the
existing Bouse-Kofa 161-kV
transmission line and construct, own,
and operate a new switchyard on BLMadministered land adjacent to the
transmission line as well as an
associated communications pathway.
Western has submitted a right-of-way
(ROW) application to the BLM for its
1 The Final EIS can be found on Western’s Web
site at: https://ww2.wapa.gov/sites/Western/
transmission/interconn/Pages/
QuartzsiteSolar.aspx.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28841
switchyard and communication
pathway.
QSE Proposed Project
The proposed Project is a 100megawatt solar electric power plant that
would use concentrating solar power
technology to capture the sun’s heat to
make steam, which would power a
traditional steam turbine generator. The
proposed Project would contain the
central receiver or tower, a solar field
consisting of mirrors or heliostats to
reflect the sun’s energy to the central
tower, a conventional steam turbine
generator, insulated storage tanks for hot
and cold liquid salt, ancillary tanks,
evaporation ponds, a temporary
construction laydown area, technical
and non-technical buildings,
transformers and a 161/230-kV electrical
switchyard, roads, and water wells. All
components of the proposed Project
would be located on BLM-administered
land. A new 1.5-mile long 161/230-kV
generation tie line would extend from
the southern boundary of the solar
facility boundary to a new switchyard to
be constructed adjacent to Western’s
existing Bouse-Kofa 161-kV
transmission line.
QSE has submitted a ROW
application to the BLM for the proposed
Project. The ROW application is for a
total of 26,273 acres, of which 1,675
acres would be utilized for the final
Project ROW if approved. The proposed
Project site is in an undeveloped area in
La Paz County, Arizona, east of SR 95,
approximately 10 miles north of
Quartzsite, Arizona.
Description of Alternatives
Three alternatives were analyzed in
the EIS/PRMPA including the QSE’s
proposed Project with dry-cooling
technology, Alternative 1 with hybrid
cooling technology, and the No Action
alternative. Also analyzed were three
alternatives related to the Yuma PRMPA
including approving the PRMPA to
change approximately 6,800 acres of
Visual Resource Management (VRM)
Class III to VRM Class IV along with
Project approval, approving the PRMPA
to change approximately 6,800 acres of
VRM Class III to VRM Class IV without
Project approval, and the No Action
alternative of not approving the PRMPA
and leaving the current VRM Class III
designation in place.
Western’s preferred alternative is to
grant the interconnection request for the
proposed Project to Western’s existing
Bouse-Kofa 161-kV transmission line
and to construct, operate, and maintain
a new switchyard and communication
pathway.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
28842
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Notices
Western has identified the No Project/
No Action Alternative as its
environmentally-preferred alternative.
Under this alternative, Western would
deny the interconnection request and
not modify its transmission system to
interconnect the proposed Project.
Under this alternative, there would be
no modifications to Western’s
transmission system, and thus no new
environmental impacts.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Mitigation Measures
QSE has incorporated best
management practices and has
incorporated built-in mitigation to the
proposed Project. The mitigation
includes regular weed monitoring and
management during construction to
prevent noxious weed introductions and
conducting nest clearance surveys prior
to construction and protecting the nests
until chicks have fledged or have been
relocated into suitable habitat. QSE has
committed to these and the other
mitigation measures that are noted in
the Draft EIS/PRMPA in section 2.7:
Best Management Practices and Built-In
Mitigation. The measures were designed
to avoid and minimize harm to the
environment from the proposed Project.
For Western’s proposed switching
station, Western requires its
construction contractors to implement
standard environmental protection
provisions. These provisions are
provided in Western’s Construction
Standard 13 (included as an appendix
in the Draft EIS) and will be applied to
the proposed switchyard. In addition,
Western will comply with the
stipulations in the special use permit
that the BLM would issue, including
desert tortoise fencing and the use of flat
tone colors for the switchyard intended
to blend with the surrounding
environment.
With this decision, Western is not
adopting any additional mitigation
measures that apply to its action outside
of the measures addressed in the Final
EIS/PRMPA. The measures in the Final
EIS/PRMPA reflect all practicable
means to avoid or minimize
environmental harm from the proposed
Project and Western’s proposed action.
Comments on Final EIS/PRMPA
Western received several comments
on the Final EIS/PRMPA. Western
received comments from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), from the Defenders of Wildlife
and one from a collection of
organizations including: The Wilderness
Society/Arizona Wilderness Coalition/
Sierra Club-Grand Canyon (Arizona)
and Sonoran Institute. Based on a
review of these comments, Western has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 May 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
determined that the comments do not
present any significant new
circumstances or information relevant to
environmental concerns and bearing on
the proposed Project or its impacts, and
a Supplemental EIS is not required. The
basis for this determination is
summarized below.
EPA acknowledged that some of their
previously expressed concerns were
addressed. Additionally, EPA expressed
concern regarding the lack of specificity
regarding mitigation measures and the
lack of consideration of numerous
reasonably foreseeable projects in the
limited analysis of cumulative impacts.
As noted in the Final EIS/PRMPA,
reasonably forseeable projects and their
impacts were addressed in the Draft and
Final EIS/PRMPA. Western references
pages 4–3 through 4–10 of the Draft EIS/
PRMPA and page 22 of the Final EIS/
PRMPA for more information on the
rationale for which projects were
included in and excluded from the
cumulative impacts analysis. EPA also
expressed an interest in the
implementation of recommendations
that it feels could reduce the proposed
Project’s environmental impacts.
Western’s role in the proposed Project is
to make a decision regarding the
interconnection request. Western does
not have authority over the generation
facility to require the QSE to implement
EPA’s recommendations for
improvements to the facility.
The Defenders of Wildlife expressed
concern about the lack of compensatory
habitat for the Mohave fringe-toed
lizard. As noted on page 4–65 of the
Draft EIS/PRMPA, current data shows
there is no optimal habitat for the
Mohave fringe-toed lizard in the
proposed Project area and no
compensatory habitat plan is in place
for this species. Should impacts to the
Mohave fringe-toed lizard occur, as
noted on page 4–69 of the Draft EIS/
PRMPA, ‘‘adaptive-management
strategies to mitigate unforeseeable
impacts as they occur,’’ will be
incorporated. Furthermore, as noted on
page 47 of the Final EIS/PRMPA, the
BLM in cooperation with the AZGFD,
proposes to authorize a monitor and
study plan to address impacts to habitat
functions and values to increase the
scientific community’s information on
the Mohave fringe-toed lizard and its
habitat.
Finally, The Wilderness Society/
Arizona Wilderness Coalition/Sierra
Club-Grand Canyon (Arizona) and
Sonoran Institute expressed concern
about the BLM management of lands
with wilderness characteristics in and
around the proposed Project area.
Western does not have authority over
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BLM-administered lands and cannot
dictate how lands with wilderness
characteristics are managed. Land with
wilderness characteristics were
addressed on pages 42–43 of the Final
EIS/PRMPA.
Decision
Western’s decision is to allow QSE’s
request for interconnection to Western’s
transmission system at its Bouse-Kofa
161-kV transmission line and to
construct, own and operate a new
switchyard.2 Western’s decision to grant
this interconnection request satisfies the
agency’s statutory mission and QSE’s
objectives while minimizing harm to the
environment. Full implementation of
this decision is contingent upon QSE
obtaining all other applicable permits
and approvals as well as executing an
interconnection agreement in
accordance with Western’s Tariff.
This decision is based on the
information contained in the Project
Draft and Final EIS/PRMPA. This ROD
was prepared pursuant to the
requirements of the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts
1500–1508) and DOE’s Procedures for
Implementing NEPA (10 CFR part 1021).
Dated: May 6, 2013.
Mark A. Gabriel,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–11696 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Searchlight Wind Energy Project
Record of Decision (DOE/EIS–0413)
Western Area Power
Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
Western Area Power
Administration (Western), an agency
within the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), received a request from
Searchlight Wind Energy, LLC
(Searchlight) to interconnect its
proposed Searchlight Wind Energy
Project (Project) to Western’s DavisMead 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission
line. The Project would be located in
southern Clark County, Nevada, near the
town of Searchlight. On December 14,
2012, the Notice of Availability of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
SUMMARY:
2 On November 16, 2011, DOE’s Acting General
Counsel restated the delegations to Western’s
Administrator of all the authorities of the General
Counsel respecting environmental impact
statements.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 95 (Thursday, May 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28841-28842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11696]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Quartzsite Solar Energy Project Record of Decision (DOE/EIS-0440)
AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Western Area Power Administration (Western), an agency within
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), received a request from Quartzsite
Solar Energy, LLC (QSE) to interconnect its proposed Quartzsite Solar
Energy Project (Project) to Western's Bouse-Kofa 161-kilovolt (kV)
transmission line. The proposed Project site is in an undeveloped area
in La Paz County, Arizona, east of State Route (SR) 95, approximately
10 miles north of Quartzsite, Arizona, on lands administered by the
U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
On December 21, 2012, the Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Yuma Field Office (Yuma)
Proposed Resource Management Plan Amendment (PRMPA) for Quartzsite
Solar Energy Project was published in the Federal Register (77 FR
75632). After considering the environmental impacts, Western has
decided to allow QSE's request for interconnection to Western's
transmission system on the Bouse-Kofa 161-kV transmission line and to
construct, own, and operate a new switchyard and its associated
communication pathway.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please
contact Ms. Liana Reilly, Environmental Project Manager, Corporate
Services Office, Western Area Power Administration, A7400, P.O. Box
281213, Lakewood, CO 80228, telephone (720) 962-7253, fax (720) 962-
7263, or email: reilly@wapa.gov. For general information on DOE's
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) review process, please
contact Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, GC-54, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585,
telephone (202) 586-4600 or (800) 472-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Western is a Federal agency under the DOE
that markets and transmits wholesale electrical power through an
integrated 17,000-circuit mile, high-voltage transmission system across
15 western states. Western's Open Access Transmission Service Tariff
(Tariff) provides open access to its electric transmission system. In
reviewing interconnection requests, Western must ensure that existing
reliability and service is not degraded. Western's Large Generator
Interconnection Procedures provide for transmission and system studies
to ensure that system reliability and service to existing customers are
not adversely affected by new interconnections.
In compliance with the NEPA, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended, Western as lead agency,
with the BLM as a cooperating agency, prepared and released the Draft
EIS/PRMPA on November 10, 2011, and subsequently held public hearings
on the document in Yuma, Arizona, on December 13, 2011, and in
Quartzsite, Arizona, on December 14, 2011. Following the release of the
Draft EIS/PRMPA, Western and the BLM prepared a Final EIS/PRMPA which
was released on December 21, 2012 (77 FR 76477).\1\ The U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, the U.S. Army Garrison-Yuma Proving Ground, the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality and the Arizona Game and Fish
Department (AZGFD) were also cooperating agencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Final EIS can be found on Western's Web site at: https://ww2.wapa.gov/sites/Western/transmission/interconn/Pages/QuartzsiteSolar.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Federal Action
Western's proposed Federal action is to interconnect the proposed
Project to Western's transmission system at the existing Bouse-Kofa
161-kV transmission line and construct, own, and operate a new
switchyard on BLM-administered land adjacent to the transmission line
as well as an associated communications pathway. Western has submitted
a right-of-way (ROW) application to the BLM for its switchyard and
communication pathway.
QSE Proposed Project
The proposed Project is a 100-megawatt solar electric power plant
that would use concentrating solar power technology to capture the
sun's heat to make steam, which would power a traditional steam turbine
generator. The proposed Project would contain the central receiver or
tower, a solar field consisting of mirrors or heliostats to reflect the
sun's energy to the central tower, a conventional steam turbine
generator, insulated storage tanks for hot and cold liquid salt,
ancillary tanks, evaporation ponds, a temporary construction laydown
area, technical and non-technical buildings, transformers and a 161/
230-kV electrical switchyard, roads, and water wells. All components of
the proposed Project would be located on BLM-administered land. A new
1.5-mile long 161/230-kV generation tie line would extend from the
southern boundary of the solar facility boundary to a new switchyard to
be constructed adjacent to Western's existing Bouse-Kofa 161-kV
transmission line.
QSE has submitted a ROW application to the BLM for the proposed
Project. The ROW application is for a total of 26,273 acres, of which
1,675 acres would be utilized for the final Project ROW if approved.
The proposed Project site is in an undeveloped area in La Paz County,
Arizona, east of SR 95, approximately 10 miles north of Quartzsite,
Arizona.
Description of Alternatives
Three alternatives were analyzed in the EIS/PRMPA including the
QSE's proposed Project with dry-cooling technology, Alternative 1 with
hybrid cooling technology, and the No Action alternative. Also analyzed
were three alternatives related to the Yuma PRMPA including approving
the PRMPA to change approximately 6,800 acres of Visual Resource
Management (VRM) Class III to VRM Class IV along with Project approval,
approving the PRMPA to change approximately 6,800 acres of VRM Class
III to VRM Class IV without Project approval, and the No Action
alternative of not approving the PRMPA and leaving the current VRM
Class III designation in place.
Western's preferred alternative is to grant the interconnection
request for the proposed Project to Western's existing Bouse-Kofa 161-
kV transmission line and to construct, operate, and maintain a new
switchyard and communication pathway.
[[Page 28842]]
Western has identified the No Project/No Action Alternative as its
environmentally-preferred alternative. Under this alternative, Western
would deny the interconnection request and not modify its transmission
system to interconnect the proposed Project. Under this alternative,
there would be no modifications to Western's transmission system, and
thus no new environmental impacts.
Mitigation Measures
QSE has incorporated best management practices and has incorporated
built-in mitigation to the proposed Project. The mitigation includes
regular weed monitoring and management during construction to prevent
noxious weed introductions and conducting nest clearance surveys prior
to construction and protecting the nests until chicks have fledged or
have been relocated into suitable habitat. QSE has committed to these
and the other mitigation measures that are noted in the Draft EIS/PRMPA
in section 2.7: Best Management Practices and Built-In Mitigation. The
measures were designed to avoid and minimize harm to the environment
from the proposed Project. For Western's proposed switching station,
Western requires its construction contractors to implement standard
environmental protection provisions. These provisions are provided in
Western's Construction Standard 13 (included as an appendix in the
Draft EIS) and will be applied to the proposed switchyard. In addition,
Western will comply with the stipulations in the special use permit
that the BLM would issue, including desert tortoise fencing and the use
of flat tone colors for the switchyard intended to blend with the
surrounding environment.
With this decision, Western is not adopting any additional
mitigation measures that apply to its action outside of the measures
addressed in the Final EIS/PRMPA. The measures in the Final EIS/PRMPA
reflect all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm
from the proposed Project and Western's proposed action.
Comments on Final EIS/PRMPA
Western received several comments on the Final EIS/PRMPA. Western
received comments from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
from the Defenders of Wildlife and one from a collection of
organizations including: The Wilderness Society/Arizona Wilderness
Coalition/Sierra Club-Grand Canyon (Arizona) and Sonoran Institute.
Based on a review of these comments, Western has determined that the
comments do not present any significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the
proposed Project or its impacts, and a Supplemental EIS is not
required. The basis for this determination is summarized below.
EPA acknowledged that some of their previously expressed concerns
were addressed. Additionally, EPA expressed concern regarding the lack
of specificity regarding mitigation measures and the lack of
consideration of numerous reasonably foreseeable projects in the
limited analysis of cumulative impacts. As noted in the Final EIS/
PRMPA, reasonably forseeable projects and their impacts were addressed
in the Draft and Final EIS/PRMPA. Western references pages 4-3 through
4-10 of the Draft EIS/PRMPA and page 22 of the Final EIS/PRMPA for more
information on the rationale for which projects were included in and
excluded from the cumulative impacts analysis. EPA also expressed an
interest in the implementation of recommendations that it feels could
reduce the proposed Project's environmental impacts. Western's role in
the proposed Project is to make a decision regarding the
interconnection request. Western does not have authority over the
generation facility to require the QSE to implement EPA's
recommendations for improvements to the facility.
The Defenders of Wildlife expressed concern about the lack of
compensatory habitat for the Mohave fringe-toed lizard. As noted on
page 4-65 of the Draft EIS/PRMPA, current data shows there is no
optimal habitat for the Mohave fringe-toed lizard in the proposed
Project area and no compensatory habitat plan is in place for this
species. Should impacts to the Mohave fringe-toed lizard occur, as
noted on page 4-69 of the Draft EIS/PRMPA, ``adaptive-management
strategies to mitigate unforeseeable impacts as they occur,'' will be
incorporated. Furthermore, as noted on page 47 of the Final EIS/PRMPA,
the BLM in cooperation with the AZGFD, proposes to authorize a monitor
and study plan to address impacts to habitat functions and values to
increase the scientific community's information on the Mohave fringe-
toed lizard and its habitat.
Finally, The Wilderness Society/Arizona Wilderness Coalition/Sierra
Club-Grand Canyon (Arizona) and Sonoran Institute expressed concern
about the BLM management of lands with wilderness characteristics in
and around the proposed Project area. Western does not have authority
over BLM-administered lands and cannot dictate how lands with
wilderness characteristics are managed. Land with wilderness
characteristics were addressed on pages 42-43 of the Final EIS/PRMPA.
Decision
Western's decision is to allow QSE's request for interconnection to
Western's transmission system at its Bouse-Kofa 161-kV transmission
line and to construct, own and operate a new switchyard.\2\ Western's
decision to grant this interconnection request satisfies the agency's
statutory mission and QSE's objectives while minimizing harm to the
environment. Full implementation of this decision is contingent upon
QSE obtaining all other applicable permits and approvals as well as
executing an interconnection agreement in accordance with Western's
Tariff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On November 16, 2011, DOE's Acting General Counsel restated
the delegations to Western's Administrator of all the authorities of
the General Counsel respecting environmental impact statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This decision is based on the information contained in the Project
Draft and Final EIS/PRMPA. This ROD was prepared pursuant to the
requirements of the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) and DOE's Procedures for
Implementing NEPA (10 CFR part 1021).
Dated: May 6, 2013.
Mark A. Gabriel,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-11696 Filed 5-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P