Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations for Armstrong County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions), 28779-28780 [2013-11588]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 The memorandum addresses the following specific fleets: • Initial fueling of new vehicles at automobile assembly plants; • Refueling of rental cars at rental car facilities; and • Refueling of flexible fuel vehicles at E85 dispensing pumps. Most large rental companies rent current model vehicles, that are equipped with ORVR and vehicle models are updated to current year models every year or two. The Commonwealth of Kentucky has confirmed that 100 percent of the fleet will be equipped with 2006 model year (first model year vehicles required to be equipped with ORVR) and newer vehicles at the Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Boone County. CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prohibits facilities within the State from emitting any air pollutants in amounts which will contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any other State with respect to any such national primary or secondary ambient air quality standards. The only pollutant emitted by refueling vehicles is VOC, which is a precursor of ozone, and its emissions are mitigated by the use of vehicles equipped with ORVR. EPA has preliminarily determined that Kentucky has adequately demonstrated that ORVR is in widespread use and that the Stage II requirements of the Kentucky SIP have been sufficiently supplanted by the ORVR such that exemption of the Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility from the Stage II requirements would not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned source-specific SIP revision request from Kentucky. VOC emissions from vehicles at Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facilities are controlled by ORVR, therefore, EPA has preliminarily concluded that removal of Stage II requirements at this facility would not result in an increase of VOC emissions, and thus would not contribute to ozone formation. The Commonwealth is seeking to remove this requirement for this facility and EPA has preliminarily determined that Kentucky has fully satisfied the requirements of section 110(l) of the CAA. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve this source-specific SIP revision, as being consistent with section 110 of the CAA. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:07 May 15, 2013 Jkt 229001 IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, these proposed actions merely approve state law as meeting federal requirements and do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by Commonwealth law. For that reason, these proposed actions: • Are not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); • do not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • are not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • are not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • are not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the Commonwealth, and it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 28779 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Greenhouse Gas, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 7, 2013. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2013–11713 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency 44 CFR Part 67 [Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002: Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1152] Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations for Armstrong County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions) Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. AGENCY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed rule concerning proposed flood elevation determinations for Armstrong County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions). DATES: This withdrawal is effective on May 16, 2013. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–1152 to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 2, 2010, FEMA published a proposed rulemaking at 75 FR 67304, proposing flood elevation determinations along one or more flooding sources in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. Because FEMA has or SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM 16MYP1 28780 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules will be issuing a Revised Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map, and if necessary a Flood Insurance Study report, featuring updated flood hazard information, the proposed rulemaking is being withdrawn. A Notice of Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations will be published in the Federal Register and in the affected community’s local newspaper. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4. Roy E. Wright, Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. determinations along one or more flooding sources in Beaver County, Pennsylvania. Because FEMA has or will be issuing a Revised Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map, and if necessary a Flood Insurance Study report, featuring updated flood hazard information, the proposed rulemaking is being withdrawn. A Notice of Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations will be published in the Federal Register and in the affected community’s local newspaper. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4. Roy E. Wright, Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. rulemaking at 76 FR 26978, proposing flood elevation determinations along one or more flooding sources in Greene County, Pennsylvania. Because FEMA has or will be issuing a Revised Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map, and if necessary a Flood Insurance Study report, featuring updated flood hazard information, the proposed rulemaking is being withdrawn. A Notice of Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations will be published in the Federal Register and in the affected community’s local newspaper. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4. [FR Doc. 2013–11591 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am] Roy E. Wright, Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BILLING CODE 9110–12–P [FR Doc. 2013–11594 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am] Federal Emergency Management Agency DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 44 CFR Part 67 Federal Emergency Management Agency Defense Acquisition Regulations System 44 CFR Part 67 48 CFR Parts 202, 231, 244, 246, and 252 [FR Doc. 2013–11588 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–12–P BILLING CODE 9110–12–P [Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1147] Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations for Beaver County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions) [Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1190] Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations for Greene County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions) Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. AGENCY: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On October 5, 2010, FEMA published a proposed rulemaking at 75 FR 61377, proposing flood elevation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:07 May 15, 2013 Jkt 229001 Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. AGENCY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed rule concerning proposed flood elevation determinations for Beaver County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions). DATES: This withdrawal is effective on May 16, 2013. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–1147 to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed rule concerning proposed flood elevation determinations for Greene County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions). DATES: This withdrawal is effective on May 16, 2013. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–1190 to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 10, 2011, FEMA published a proposed SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 RIN 0750–AH88 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Detection and Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic Parts (DFARS Case 2012–D055) Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) in partial implementation of a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, and a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, relating to the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. DATES: Comment Date: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before July 15, 2013, to be considered in the formation of a final rule. ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2012–D055, using any of the following methods: Æ Regulations.gov: http:// www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ‘‘DFARS Case 2012–D055’’ under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM 16MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 95 (Thursday, May 16, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28779-28780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002: Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1152]


Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations for Armstrong County, 
Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions)

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing 
its proposed rule concerning proposed flood elevation determinations 
for Armstrong County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions).

DATES: This withdrawal is effective on May 16, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
1152 to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal 
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064, or 
(email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 2, 2010, FEMA published a 
proposed rulemaking at 75 FR 67304, proposing flood elevation 
determinations along one or more flooding sources in Armstrong County, 
Pennsylvania. Because FEMA has or

[[Page 28780]]

will be issuing a Revised Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map, and if 
necessary a Flood Insurance Study report, featuring updated flood 
hazard information, the proposed rulemaking is being withdrawn. A 
Notice of Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations will be published in the 
Federal Register and in the affected community's local newspaper.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland 
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-11588 Filed 5-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P