Exchange Visitor Program-Fees and Charges, 28137-28139 [2013-11484]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Orig
Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 1
Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Orig
Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 1
Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, NDB RWY 4,
Amdt 7
Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, NDB RWY
22, Amdt 8
Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 4, Orig
Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 22, Orig
Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Mountain View, MO, Mountain View, NDB
OR GPS RWY 28, Amdt 3, CANCELED
Mountain View, MO, Mountain View, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Mountain View, MO, Mountain View, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Tecumseh, NE, Tecumseh Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 15, Orig
Tecumseh, NE, Tecumseh Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 33, Orig
Tecumseh, NE, Tecumseh Muni, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Gettysburg, SD, Gettysburg Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 2
Gettysburg, SD, Gettysburg Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 2
Vermillion, SD, Harold Davidson Field,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1
Memphis, TN, Memphis Intl, RNAV (RNP) Y
RWY 18C, Orig-C
Smithville, TN, Smithville Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 3
Smithville, TN, Smithville Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 3
Cleburne, TX, Cleburne Rgnl, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 15, Amdt 1
Cleburne, TX, Cleburne Rgnl, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 33, Amdt 1
Cleburne, TX, Cleburne Rgnl, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig-A
Mineral Wells, TX, Mineral Wells, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 8, Orig
San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 2
San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 17, Orig
San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 26, Orig
San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 31, Orig
San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 35, Orig
[FR Doc. 2013–11327 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 62
RIN 1400–AD28
[Public Notice 8322]
Exchange Visitor Program—Fees and
Charges
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of State
(Department) is revising regulations to
increase the Application Fee for
Sponsor Designation or Redesignation
and the Administrative Fee for
Exchange Visitor (J–1 Visa Holder)
Benefits assessed for providing
Exchange Visitor Program services, in
order to recoup the costs incurred by the
Department’s Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs associated with
operating the Exchange Visitor Program.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective June 13, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin J. Lerner, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Private Sector Exchange,
U.S. Department of State, SA–5, Floor 5,
2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC
20522, 202–632–9290, or email at
JExchanges@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department published a proposed rule
on January 30, 2013 (RIN 1400–AD28;
78 FR 6263), with a request for
comments, to amend 22 CFR 62.17
(‘‘Fees and Charges’’) to increase fees to
recover the costs of administrative
processing of requests for program
designation or redesignation, and
certain services for exchange visitor
benefits. These costs were calculated by
an independent, certified public
accounting firm following the
guidelines set forth in Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–25 regarding such fee
calculation.
The Department received thirteen
comments and is now promulgating a
final rule with no changes from the
proposed rule. Thus, the application fee
charged to U.S. corporate entities will
increase to $3,982.00 for program
designation and redesignation. The
individual program services fee paid by
foreign nationals will increase to
$367.00 for services such as change of
program category, program extensions
and reinstatements.
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Comment Analysis
The Department received thirteen
comments. One comment suggested that
the Exchange Visitor Program be shut
down and the other, from a foreign
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28137
national, requested assistance on visas
and travel. These comments were not
responsive to the proposed rule.
Three comments represented the
academic community and supported the
proposed rule. One commenter stated
that the fees should be adopted and
believes that the Department cannot
prevent abuses to the program if the
Office of Designation limits itself, as it
does now, to some 13 staff members
monitoring more than 1,400 separate
and distinct sponsors. Two comments
did not object to the increases, but
requested that sufficient time be
allowed so that academic institutions
could properly budget for the 47%
increase in the application fee. The
Department’s fee schedule is reviewed
and implemented on a two-year cycle.
Delaying the fee increases for all
sponsors is not feasible.
In addition, one of the three
commenters who expressed support for
the proposed rule requested clarification
as to whether designation fees paid by
private sector program sponsors were
also meant to cover the cost of
administering U.S. Government
exchange programs. Designation fees
paid by private sector program sponsors
do not currently fund the administration
of U.S. Government exchange programs,
and the Department does not anticipate
that private sector programs would
cover the cost of administering such
exchange programs in the future.
A total of eight comments oppose the
proposed increase in fees. One comment
inquired about the purpose of increasing
the application fee since the Department
has imposed a moratorium on new
sponsor applications for the Summer
Work Travel category of the Exchange
Visitor Program. Once the Department
has completed the comprehensive
review of the Summer Work Travel
category, it is anticipated that the
moratorium will be lifted.
Another comment opposed the
increase and stated that the opposition
was ‘‘due to the Department’s failure to
adequately demonstrate its best use of
resources and lack of timely and
knowledgeable response time to
questions and application requests.’’
According to this commenter, the
requirement to provide increased
oversight of the Exchange Visitor
Program over the last two years has
diverted resources away from the
administrative processing of stakeholder
requests. The increase in fees is
designed to facilitate the hiring of
additional staff to manage the
administrative workload in a timely
fashion, increase the Office of
Designation’s efficiency and enhance
the office’s customer service. Five
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
28138
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
commenters opposed the proposed
administrative fee and noted the impact
it will have on au pair participants
wishing to extend their program beyond
the twelve-month maximum duration.
The Department designed the
administrative fee to recoup the cost to
the Department of processing the action
for the participant, regardless of
category.
Finally, one commenter opposed the
fee structure and questioned whether
applications for designation and
redesignation undergo the same level of
review. The commenting party also
noted that both large and small sponsors
are charged the same application fee,
and suggested that the fee structure be
based on program size. The Department
recognizes that, in general, processing
designation and redesignation
applications does not require the same
level of review. The Department also
recognizes that there is an on-going
relationship between the parties once a
sponsor becomes designated. This
relationship involves program
monitoring, responding to sponsor
inquiries, processing of requests whose
costs are not recouped through
administrative fees, and other activities,
all of which must be funded.
Program size has minimal impact on
the level of effort associated with
processing redesignation applications,
since the Office of Designation has to
review and assess the same factors and
the same documents.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that the Exchange Visitor
Program is a foreign affairs function of
the U.S. Government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from section 553 (Rulemaking) and
section 554 (Adjudications) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The U.S. Government supervises
programs that invite foreign nationals to
come to the United States to participate
in exchange visitor programs, either
directly or through private sector
program sponsors or grantees. When
problems occur, the U.S. Government
often has been, and likely will be, held
accountable by foreign governments for
the treatment of their nationals,
regardless of who is responsible for the
problems.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
set the fees that will fund services
provided by the Exchange Visitor
Program Office of Designation to more
than 1,400 sponsor organizations and
300,000 Exchange Visitor Program
participants. These services include
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
oversight and compliance with program
requirements, as well as the monitoring
of programs to ensure the health, safety
and well-being of foreign nationals
entering the United States (many of
these exchange programs and
participants are funded by the U.S.
Government) under the aegis of the
Exchange Visitor Program and in
furtherance of its foreign relations
mission. The Department of State
represents that failure to protect the
health and well-being of these foreign
nationals and their appropriate
placement with reputable organizations
will have direct and substantial adverse
effects on the foreign affairs of the
United States.
Although the Department is of the
opinion that this rulemaking is exempt
from the rulemaking provisions of the
APA, the Department published this
rulemaking as an NPRM and solicited
comments, without prejudice to its
determination that this rulemaking
concerns a foreign affairs function of the
Department.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
As discussed above, the Department
believes that this final rule is exempt
from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553.
This final rule is not subject to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) or
Executive Order 13272.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million in any
year and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the
provisions of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rulemaking.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
Based on the criteria of 5 U.S.C.
804(2), the Department does not believe
this rulemaking will have an annual
effect on the economy of $100,000,000
or more. The Department estimates that
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
approximately 60 government, academic
and private sector programs apply for
designation annually, and
approximately 700 of the currentlydesignated sponsors apply for
redesignation annually. Therefore, 760
organizations will be required to pay the
application fee, which amounts to a
total of $3,026,320, an increase of
$974,320 from the current application
fee of $2700 ($3,026,320–$2,052,000).
This is the only monetary effect on the
economy that the Department is able to
identify.
A rule is also considered ‘‘major’’ if it
will result in a major increase in costs
or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, state or local
government agencies, or geographic
regions. The Department does not
anticipate that this rule will have any
effect at all on those categories. Finally,
a rule is considered major if it will have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
foreign markets. The Department knows
of no adverse effects, much less
significant adverse effects, on any of
those categories.
This rulemaking has been found not
to be a major rule within the meaning
of 5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Order 13563 and Executive
Order 12866
As discussed above, the Department is
of the opinion that the Exchange Visitor
Program is a foreign affairs function of
the United States Government and that
rules governing the conduct of this
function are generally exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
However, the Department has
nevertheless reviewed this final rule to
ensure its consistency with the
regulatory philosophy and principles set
forth in that Executive Order.
The Department has examined the
economic benefits, costs, and transfers
associated with this rule, and declares
that educational and cultural exchanges
are both cornerstones of U.S. public
diplomacy and an integral component of
U.S. foreign policy. The benefits of these
exchanges to the United States and its
people are invaluable and cannot be
monetized; in the same way, even one
exchange visitor having a bad
experience or, worse, being mistreated,
will result in embarrassment and
incalculable harm to the foreign policy
of the United States. Therefore, the
Department is of the opinion that the
benefits of this rulemaking outweigh its
costs.
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12988
The Department has reviewed this
rulemaking in light of Executive Order
12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Orders 12372 and Executive
Order 13132
This rulemaking will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this rulemaking
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
rulemaking are pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35 and OMB Control Number
1405–0147, expiring on November 30,
2013.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Tuckahoe River, Between Corbin City
and Upper Township, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the draw of the
State Highway Bridge across the
Tuckahoe River, mile 8.0, between
Corbin City and Upper Township, NJ.
The deviation is necessary to facilitate
mechanical repair work for excessive
corrosion within working assemblies on
the State Highway Bridge. This
deviation allows the drawbridge to
remain in the closed to navigation
position during the deviation period.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
May 14, 2013 to 7 a.m. on October 24,
2013.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2013–0308] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation. You may
also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182,
1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C. 1431–1442, 2451 et
seq.; Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105–277,
Div. G, 112 Stat. 2681 et seq.; Reorganization
Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p.
200; E.O. 12048 of March 27, 1978; 3 CFR,
1978 Comp. p. 168; the Illegal Immigration
Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
(IIRIRA) of 1996, Pub. L. 104–208, Div. C, 110
Stat. 3009–546, as amended; Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA
PATRIOT ACT), Pub. L. 107–56, Sec. 416,
115 Stat. 354; and the Enhanced Border
Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002,
Pub. L. 107–173, 116 Stat. 543.
2. Section 62.17 is revised to read as
follows:
■
Fees and charges.
(a) Remittances. Fees prescribed
within the framework of 31 U.S.C. 9701
Jkt 229001
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0308]
■
15:25 May 13, 2013
[FR Doc. 2013–11484 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
33 CFR Part 117
PART 62—EXCHANGE VISITOR
PROGRAM
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Dated: May 8, 2013.
Robin J. Lerner,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Private Sector
Exchange, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
Coast Guard
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62
Cultural exchange program.
Accordingly, 22 CFR part 62 is
amended as follows:
§ 62.17
must be submitted as directed by the
Department and must be in the amount
prescribed by law or regulation.
(b) Amounts of fees. The following
fees are prescribed.
(1) For filing an application for
program designation and/or
redesignation (Form DS–3036)—
$3,982.00.
(2) For filing an application for
exchange visitor status changes (i.e.,
extension beyond the maximum
duration, change of category,
reinstatement, reinstatement-update
SEVIS status, ECFMG sponsorship
authorization, and permission to
issue)—$367.00.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
28139
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Mr. Jim
Rousseau, Bridge Administration
Branch Fifth District, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–398–6557, email
James.L.Rousseau2@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, 202–366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The New
Jersey Department of Transportation,
who owns and operates this swing
bridge, has requested a temporary
deviation from the current operating
regulations set out in 33 CFR 117.758,
to facilitate emergency repair work on
the structure.
Under the regular operating schedule,
the State Highway Bridge, mile 8.0,
between Corbin City and Upper
Township, NJ shall open on signal if at
least 24 hours notice is given. The State
Highway Bridge has vertical clearance
in the closed position of 8 feet above
mean high water.
Under this temporary deviation, the
drawbridge will be closed to navigation
from May 14, 2013 to 7 a.m. on
Thursday October 24, 2013. Emergency
openings cannot be provided. There are
no alternate routes for vessels transiting
this section of the Tuckahoe River.
The Tuckahoe River in this area is
used by small recreational vessels.
There have been no documented
navigational requests for openings in 28
years. The Coast Guard will inform
users of the waterway through our Local
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners of the
closure periods for the bridge so that
vessels can arrange their transits to
minimize any impacts caused by the
temporary deviation. Mariners able to
pass under the bridge in the closed
position may do so at any time.
Mariners are advised to proceed with
caution.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 1, 2013.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Bridge Program Manager, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2013–11365 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28137-28139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11484]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 62
RIN 1400-AD28
[Public Notice 8322]
Exchange Visitor Program--Fees and Charges
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of State (Department) is revising
regulations to increase the Application Fee for Sponsor Designation or
Redesignation and the Administrative Fee for Exchange Visitor (J-1 Visa
Holder) Benefits assessed for providing Exchange Visitor Program
services, in order to recoup the costs incurred by the Department's
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs associated with operating
the Exchange Visitor Program.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective June 13, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin J. Lerner, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Private Sector Exchange, U.S. Department of State, SA-5,
Floor 5, 2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20522, 202-632-9290, or
email at JExchanges@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department published a proposed rule on
January 30, 2013 (RIN 1400-AD28; 78 FR 6263), with a request for
comments, to amend 22 CFR 62.17 (``Fees and Charges'') to increase fees
to recover the costs of administrative processing of requests for
program designation or redesignation, and certain services for exchange
visitor benefits. These costs were calculated by an independent,
certified public accounting firm following the guidelines set forth in
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-25 regarding such fee
calculation.
The Department received thirteen comments and is now promulgating a
final rule with no changes from the proposed rule. Thus, the
application fee charged to U.S. corporate entities will increase to
$3,982.00 for program designation and redesignation. The individual
program services fee paid by foreign nationals will increase to $367.00
for services such as change of program category, program extensions and
reinstatements.
Comment Analysis
The Department received thirteen comments. One comment suggested
that the Exchange Visitor Program be shut down and the other, from a
foreign national, requested assistance on visas and travel. These
comments were not responsive to the proposed rule.
Three comments represented the academic community and supported the
proposed rule. One commenter stated that the fees should be adopted and
believes that the Department cannot prevent abuses to the program if
the Office of Designation limits itself, as it does now, to some 13
staff members monitoring more than 1,400 separate and distinct
sponsors. Two comments did not object to the increases, but requested
that sufficient time be allowed so that academic institutions could
properly budget for the 47% increase in the application fee. The
Department's fee schedule is reviewed and implemented on a two-year
cycle. Delaying the fee increases for all sponsors is not feasible.
In addition, one of the three commenters who expressed support for
the proposed rule requested clarification as to whether designation
fees paid by private sector program sponsors were also meant to cover
the cost of administering U.S. Government exchange programs.
Designation fees paid by private sector program sponsors do not
currently fund the administration of U.S. Government exchange programs,
and the Department does not anticipate that private sector programs
would cover the cost of administering such exchange programs in the
future.
A total of eight comments oppose the proposed increase in fees. One
comment inquired about the purpose of increasing the application fee
since the Department has imposed a moratorium on new sponsor
applications for the Summer Work Travel category of the Exchange
Visitor Program. Once the Department has completed the comprehensive
review of the Summer Work Travel category, it is anticipated that the
moratorium will be lifted.
Another comment opposed the increase and stated that the opposition
was ``due to the Department's failure to adequately demonstrate its
best use of resources and lack of timely and knowledgeable response
time to questions and application requests.'' According to this
commenter, the requirement to provide increased oversight of the
Exchange Visitor Program over the last two years has diverted resources
away from the administrative processing of stakeholder requests. The
increase in fees is designed to facilitate the hiring of additional
staff to manage the administrative workload in a timely fashion,
increase the Office of Designation's efficiency and enhance the
office's customer service. Five
[[Page 28138]]
commenters opposed the proposed administrative fee and noted the impact
it will have on au pair participants wishing to extend their program
beyond the twelve-month maximum duration. The Department designed the
administrative fee to recoup the cost to the Department of processing
the action for the participant, regardless of category.
Finally, one commenter opposed the fee structure and questioned
whether applications for designation and redesignation undergo the same
level of review. The commenting party also noted that both large and
small sponsors are charged the same application fee, and suggested that
the fee structure be based on program size. The Department recognizes
that, in general, processing designation and redesignation applications
does not require the same level of review. The Department also
recognizes that there is an on-going relationship between the parties
once a sponsor becomes designated. This relationship involves program
monitoring, responding to sponsor inquiries, processing of requests
whose costs are not recouped through administrative fees, and other
activities, all of which must be funded.
Program size has minimal impact on the level of effort associated
with processing redesignation applications, since the Office of
Designation has to review and assess the same factors and the same
documents.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that the Exchange Visitor
Program is a foreign affairs function of the U.S. Government and that
rules implementing this function are exempt from section 553
(Rulemaking) and section 554 (Adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA). The U.S. Government supervises programs that
invite foreign nationals to come to the United States to participate in
exchange visitor programs, either directly or through private sector
program sponsors or grantees. When problems occur, the U.S. Government
often has been, and likely will be, held accountable by foreign
governments for the treatment of their nationals, regardless of who is
responsible for the problems.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to set the fees that will fund
services provided by the Exchange Visitor Program Office of Designation
to more than 1,400 sponsor organizations and 300,000 Exchange Visitor
Program participants. These services include oversight and compliance
with program requirements, as well as the monitoring of programs to
ensure the health, safety and well-being of foreign nationals entering
the United States (many of these exchange programs and participants are
funded by the U.S. Government) under the aegis of the Exchange Visitor
Program and in furtherance of its foreign relations mission. The
Department of State represents that failure to protect the health and
well-being of these foreign nationals and their appropriate placement
with reputable organizations will have direct and substantial adverse
effects on the foreign affairs of the United States.
Although the Department is of the opinion that this rulemaking is
exempt from the rulemaking provisions of the APA, the Department
published this rulemaking as an NPRM and solicited comments, without
prejudice to its determination that this rulemaking concerns a foreign
affairs function of the Department.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
As discussed above, the Department believes that this final rule is
exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553. This final rule is not
subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601, et seq.) or Executive Order 13272.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking will not result in the expenditure by State, local
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have
tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the provisions of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
Based on the criteria of 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Department does not
believe this rulemaking will have an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more. The Department estimates that approximately 60
government, academic and private sector programs apply for designation
annually, and approximately 700 of the currently-designated sponsors
apply for redesignation annually. Therefore, 760 organizations will be
required to pay the application fee, which amounts to a total of
$3,026,320, an increase of $974,320 from the current application fee of
$2700 ($3,026,320-$2,052,000). This is the only monetary effect on the
economy that the Department is able to identify.
A rule is also considered ``major'' if it will result in a major
increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries,
Federal, state or local government agencies, or geographic regions. The
Department does not anticipate that this rule will have any effect at
all on those categories. Finally, a rule is considered major if it will
have significant adverse effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United
States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in
domestic and foreign markets. The Department knows of no adverse
effects, much less significant adverse effects, on any of those
categories.
This rulemaking has been found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of 5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866
As discussed above, the Department is of the opinion that the
Exchange Visitor Program is a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government and that rules governing the conduct of this function
are generally exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 12866.
However, the Department has nevertheless reviewed this final rule to
ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles
set forth in that Executive Order.
The Department has examined the economic benefits, costs, and
transfers associated with this rule, and declares that educational and
cultural exchanges are both cornerstones of U.S. public diplomacy and
an integral component of U.S. foreign policy. The benefits of these
exchanges to the United States and its people are invaluable and cannot
be monetized; in the same way, even one exchange visitor having a bad
experience or, worse, being mistreated, will result in embarrassment
and incalculable harm to the foreign policy of the United States.
Therefore, the Department is of the opinion that the benefits of this
rulemaking outweigh its costs.
[[Page 28139]]
Executive Order 12988
The Department has reviewed this rulemaking in light of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish
clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Orders 12372 and Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this rulemaking does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this
rulemaking are pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35 and OMB Control Number 1405-0147, expiring on November 30,
2013.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62
Cultural exchange program.
Accordingly, 22 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62--EXCHANGE VISITOR PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182, 1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C.
1431-1442, 2451 et seq.; Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring
Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-277, Div. G, 112 Stat. 2681 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O.
12048 of March 27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168; the Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of
1996, Pub. L. 104-208, Div. C, 110 Stat. 3009-546, as amended;
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA
PATRIOT ACT), Pub. L. 107-56, Sec. 416, 115 Stat. 354; and the
Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002, Pub. L.
107-173, 116 Stat. 543.
0
2. Section 62.17 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 62.17 Fees and charges.
(a) Remittances. Fees prescribed within the framework of 31 U.S.C.
9701 must be submitted as directed by the Department and must be in the
amount prescribed by law or regulation.
(b) Amounts of fees. The following fees are prescribed.
(1) For filing an application for program designation and/or
redesignation (Form DS-3036)--$3,982.00.
(2) For filing an application for exchange visitor status changes
(i.e., extension beyond the maximum duration, change of category,
reinstatement, reinstatement-update SEVIS status, ECFMG sponsorship
authorization, and permission to issue)--$367.00.
Dated: May 8, 2013.
Robin J. Lerner,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Private Sector Exchange, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-11484 Filed 5-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P