Tentative Eligibility Determinations; Presumptive Eligibility for Psychosis and Other Mental Illness, 28140-28143 [2013-11410]
Download as PDF
28140
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AN87
Tentative Eligibility Determinations;
Presumptive Eligibility for Psychosis
and Other Mental Illness
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
regulation authorizing tentative
eligibility determinations to comply
with amended statutory authority
concerning minimum active-duty
service requirements. This document
also codifies in regulation statutory
presumptions of medical care eligibility
for veterans of certain wars and conflicts
who developed psychosis within
specified time periods and for Persian
Gulf War veterans who developed a
mental illness other than psychosis
within 2 years after service and within
2 years after the end of the Persian Gulf
War period.
DATES: This rule is effective June 13,
2013.
SUMMARY:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin J. Cunningham, Director,
Business Policy, Chief Business Office,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420; (202) 461–1599. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA is
revising 38 CFR 17.34(b) to allow for
tentative eligibility determinations for
persons who seek a tentative eligibility
determination for VA health care based
on a period of service that began after
September 7, 1980 and meet the
minimum service requirements in 38
U.S.C. 5303A, provided they have filed
their application for VA health care
within 6 months after the date of
discharge under conditions other than
dishonorable. We are also revising
§ 17.34(b) to remove the minimum
active-duty period of 6 months for
persons who seek a tentative eligibility
determination based on a period of
service that began on or before
September 7, 1980.
We are also amending VA’s regulation
on the provision of care to non-enrolled
veterans, 38 CFR 17.37, to include
veterans with psychosis or mental
illness other than psychosis. We are
establishing a new § 17.109 that codifies
for the first time in regulation the two
presumptions of eligibility for medical
care based on specific diagnoses in
certain veteran populations, as set forth
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
in 38 U.S.C. 1702(a). Finally, we are
amending 38 CFR 17.108, 17.110, and
17.111 to clearly exempt from any
copayment requirement persons eligible
for care under proposed § 17.109.
VA proposed all of these amendments
in a document published in the Federal
Register on March 1, 2012 (77 FR
12522). We provided a 60-day comment
period, which ended on April 30, 2012.
We received seven comments from
members of the general public.
One commenter requested
clarification regarding the purpose of
the regulation. The commenter
suggested that VA intended the
regulation to ‘‘put an end to ‘mental
illness’ claims by Gulf War Vets.’’
In response, we assure the commenter
that this rulemaking does not prevent
Gulf War veterans, or any veterans, from
filing VA benefit claims. The
rulemaking facilitates an eligible
veteran’s ability to receive medical care
for psychosis and mental illness other
than psychosis. In the proposed
rulemaking, we stated that ‘‘the
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
may treat the covered disabilities as if
they were service-connected for
purposes of furnishing VHA benefits
and, in turn, determine that no
copayment is applicable to the receipt of
such benefits.’’ By providing medical
care to a veteran before VA determines
that the veteran’s psychosis or mental
illness other than psychosis is serviceconnected, VA is ensuring that the
veteran receives immediate medical
treatment for such condition, without
waiting for a determination of serviceconnection. The immediate medical
treatment will, in turn, enable the
veteran to manage his or her medical
condition more effectively.
The commenter also asked whether
VA ‘‘want[s] to use this regulation just
for medical decisions.’’ The answer is
that we do intend to use this regulation
solely for VA medical care eligibility
determinations. Tentative eligibility
determinations have no effect on a
determination of actual eligibility for
VA medical care or any other VA
benefit. We hope this explanation
resolves the commenter’s concerns, and
we do not make any changes based on
this comment.
Another commenter stated that the
‘‘entire rule should be [re]vised due to
its ineffectiveness to service military
personnel suffering from psychosis.’’
The commenter went on to state that the
proposed rule did not consider four
factors enumerated by the commenter.
The first factor is that ‘‘having a mental
illness is like having a disability.’’ The
second factor is that ‘‘the six month rule
is insane, no matter the time one serves
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this country should not be an issue.’’
The third factor is that ‘‘[t]he manner in
which a person was discharged should
not be relevant.’’ Lastly, the fourth
factor provided by the commenter
indicated that changes should start with
addressing ‘‘the understaffed and
unsanitary conditions of some of these
facilities.’’ We discuss each of these
factors below.
Regarding the commenter’s first
factor, VA currently rates a veteran’s
mental illness in accordance with the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, of the
American Psychiatric Association
(DSM–IV), and we recognize mental
illness as a disability that can serve as
the basis for an award of serviceconnection. See 38 CFR 4.130. In fact,
this final rulemaking enables VA to
provide prompt treatment of a veteran’s
psychosis or mental illness other than
psychosis without waiting for a finding
of service-connection. Providing such
treatment will not hinder the process of
determining whether the psychosis or
mental illness is service-connected for
VA purposes. In the proposed
rulemaking we made clear that, in many
cases, the condition for which the
veteran seeks care is one for which
service-connection will probably be
established. The aim of this rulemaking
is to make certain that veterans receive
prompt treatment for psychosis or
mental illness other than psychosis after
discharge from service. We do not make
any changes based on this comment.
The commenter’s second concern is
the requirement in § 17.34(b)(1) that a
veteran who seeks eligibility based on
service provided on or before September
7, 1980, must have served for a period
of at least 6 months of active duty. Since
its promulgation, VA’s regulation
governing tentative eligibility
determinations included a 6-month
minimum requirement. See 38 CFR
17.35 (1970). However, as explained in
the proposed rule preamble, we
proposed to amend § 17.34 to comply
with the minimum service requirements
contained in 38 U.S.C. 5303A, which
apply to veterans who entered active
duty after September 7, 1980. We now
remove from § 17.34(b) the 6-month
service requirement for veterans who
seek eligibility for VA health care based
on service provided on or before
September 7, 1980, in consideration of
the fact that very few, if any, veterans
will be seeking tentative eligibility
determinations within 6 months of
discharge for a period of service that
began over 32 years ago. The amount of
time that a veteran, who entered active
duty after September 7, 1980, must
serve on active duty in order to be
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
eligible for VA benefits is governed by
38 U.S.C. 5303A. Congress added a
minimum active duty requirement due
to concern that some servicemembers
were, through inappropriate or
unproductive conduct, bringing about
their early discharges, and that some of
them had enlisted for the purpose of
obtaining eligibility for veterans’
benefits based on short periods of
service. Congress believed it was
inappropriate to provide veterans’
benefits to those who substantially fail
to fulfill their active-duty service
commitments. See Senate Report 97–
153, July 8, 1981; See also Public Law
96–342. In particular, we amend
§ 17.34(b) to state that tentative
eligibility determinations for VA health
care will be made if ‘‘[t]he application
is filed within 6 months after date of
discharge under conditions other than
dishonorable, and for a veteran who
seeks eligibility based on a period of
service that began after September 7,
1980, the veteran must meet the
applicable minimum service
requirements under 38 U.S.C. 5303A.’’
For applications for which tentative
eligibility cannot be granted, VA will
honor its duty to assist veterans in
obtaining necessary documentation of
proof of service or other documentation
necessary to validate eligibility.
Regarding the commenter’s third
factor, in reference to the ‘‘manner in
which a person was discharged,’’ the
proposed rulemaking stated that the
veteran must have received an
honorable discharge to qualify for
tentative eligibility for VA health care.
The term ‘‘veteran’’ is defined in 38
U.S.C. 101(2) as ‘‘a person who served
in the active military, naval, or air
service, and who was discharged or
released therefrom under conditions
other than dishonorable.’’ Before it was
amended by this rulemaking, § 17.34(b)
stated that tentative eligibility for VA
health care may be authorized if ‘‘[t]he
application was filed within 6 months
after date of honorable discharge from a
period of not less than 6 months of
active duty.’’ Proposed § 17.34(b)
retained use of the term ‘‘honorable
discharge;’’ however, we agree with the
commenter that this may be too
restrictive. For example, a general
discharge under honorable conditions
technically is not the same as an
‘‘honorable’’ discharge, but it is a
discharge that is ‘‘other than
dishonorable.’’ To limit tentative
eligibility to veterans with an
‘‘honorable discharge’’ would exclude
some veterans with discharges that are
not dishonorable and whose eligibility
‘‘probably will be established.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
Therefore, to cover all veterans whose
eligibility for VA health care probably
will be established, we amend § 17.34(b)
to state that the application for tentative
eligibility for VA health care must be
filed within 6 months after the date of
discharge ‘‘under conditions other than
dishonorable.’’ This amendment will
also correctly reflect the requirement of
the statutory definition of ‘‘veteran,’’
which, as previously stated in this
rulemaking, requires that a person be
discharged under conditions other than
dishonorable. For applications for
which tentative eligibility cannot be
granted, VA will honor its duty to assist
veterans in obtaining necessary
documentation of proof of service or
other documentation necessary to
validate eligibility.
The commenter’s last factor
concerning ‘‘the understaffed and
unsanitary conditions of some of these
facilities’’ is beyond the scope of this
rulemaking. We do not make any
changes based on this comment.
Another commenter suggested that
the ‘‘presumptive service be given for all
veterans to whichever is later, the
proposed changes or this . . . within
two years of separation from active
duty.’’ The commenter cited as an
example that ‘‘if the presumptive
service-connection was afforded two
years after the veteran retired it would
give the veteran time to come forward
with their mental health issues after
they have separated which is more
likely the time they would report their
symptoms.’’ The purpose and meaning
of this comment is unclear.
We believe that the commenter’s
concern was that the tentative eligibility
determination under § 17.34 should
apply if a veteran submits an
application within 2 years after
discharge. The 6-month limitation for
tentative eligibility determinations for
VA health care is to afford medical
assistance to veterans immediately after
discharge but before they have had
sufficient time to file a claim to
establish eligibility as is generally
required. If the veteran’s psychosis is
not manifested immediately after
discharge, but develops within 2 years
after discharge from active duty, the
veteran may be eligible for treatment
under new § 17.109, which codifies the
statutory presumptions of eligibility
established by Congress at 38 U.S.C.
1702. The 2-year time period to be
eligible to receive medical care under 38
U.S.C. 1702 recognizes that psychosis
may take some time to fully manifest
itself. We do not make any changes
based on this comment.
A commenter supported the
rulemaking and believes that it ‘‘will
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28141
bring about needed changes to [the] VA
healthcare system.’’ The commenter also
stated that ‘‘I do, however, like that
there is no minimum service
requirement for length of active-duty in
order to qualify for these benefits.’’ The
commenter’s statement regarding no
minimum active duty service
requirement to qualify for benefits is
correct as it applies to § 17.109.
However, as previously stated in this
final rulemaking, 38 U.S.C. 5303A
establishes a minimum active duty
period for tentative eligibility
determinations, as stated in § 17.34(b).
This same commenter, along with a
second commenter, was concerned with
the 2-year time limit in § 17.109 for the
development of psychosis following
discharge to establish a presumptive
eligibility. The first commenter stated
that the ‘‘patients would have needed to
develop psychosis within 2 years of
discharge or after the war/conflict. My
problem with this provision is that
illnesses that stem from a traumatic
event, such as psychosis, can develop
later in life.’’ This first commenter
further stated that psychosis does not
follow a calendar. The second
commenter stated that ‘‘[d]espite all the
advances in diagnosing and treating
mental illnesses, the field is still not
precise in diagnosis.’’ This second
commenter further stated that the
diagnosis of a mental condition can be
subjective, because ‘‘there isn’t always
objective empirical evidence.’’ Both
commenters concluded that, to address
their concerns, VA should extend the 2year time limit. However, Congress
established the 2-year period at 38
U.S.C. 1702. As previously noted, VA
cannot amend a statutory period
through regulation. Therefore, we do not
make any changes based on these
comments.
Another commenter stated that VA
needs to ‘‘house and care for basic
human conditions, including
comprehensive medical and psychiatric
care.’’ The commenter suggested that
this care could be accomplished with
comprehensive advanced registered
nurse practitioners who work ‘‘in the
community where these veterans live.’’
We appreciate the commenter taking the
time to comment on the rulemaking,
however, we believe that the specific
mechanisms for providing care to
veterans who are in need of medical and
psychiatric care are beyond the scope of
this rulemaking. We do not make any
changes based on this comment.
Finally, one commenter observed an
increasing need for mental health care
for veterans. The commenter stated that,
although the ‘‘proposed rule would not
solve the critical issue of veterans[’]
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
28142
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
timely access to mental health care, it is
at least a step in the right direction,’’
and ‘‘might simplify the process for
soldiers applying for mental health
benefits and care.’’ This rulemaking, in
conjunction with other VA outreach and
health care services, provides VA with
the flexibility to provide care aimed at
improving the mental health of veterans.
The rulemaking also allows for the
prompt treatment of psychosis and other
mental conditions immediately after a
qualifying veteran is discharged from
service. We agree with the commenter
in that this rulemaking is a step in the
right direction for the betterment of a
veteran’s mental health. We do not
make any changes based on this
comment.
Based on the rationale set forth in the
Supplementary Information to the
proposed rule and in this final rule, VA
is adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule with the change mentioned above.
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as revised by this
rulemaking, represents VA’s
implementation of its legal authority on
this subject. Other than future
amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance
or procedures are authorized. All
existing or subsequent VA guidance
must be read to conform with this
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance is superseded
by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This final rule
will directly affect only individuals and
will not directly affect small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this rulemaking is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) unless OMB waives such review,
as ‘‘any regulatory action that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Unfunded Mandates
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for the programs affected by this
document are: 64.009, Veterans Medical
Care Benefits; 64.010, Veterans Nursing
Home Care; 64.011, Veterans Dental
Care; 64.013, Veterans Prosthetic
Appliances; 64.018, Sharing Specialized
Medical Resources; 64.019, Veterans
Rehabilitation Alcohol and Drug
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose
D. Riojas, Interim Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on May 3,
2013, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Foreign relations, Government
contracts, Grant programs—health,
Grant programs—veterans, Health care,
Health facilities, Health professions,
Health records, Homeless, Medical and
dental schools, Medical devices,
Medical research, Mental health
programs, Nursing homes, Philippines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Scholarships and
fellowships, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in this
rulemaking, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 17 as set
forth below:
PART 17—MEDICAL
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
PO 00000
Dependence; and 64.022, Veterans
Home Based Primary Care.
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
2. Amend § 17.34 by revising
paragraph (b) and adding an authority
citation to read as follows:
■
§ 17.34
Tentative eligibility determinations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Based on discharge. The
application is filed within 6 months
after date of discharge under conditions
other than dishonorable, and for a
veteran who seeks eligibility based on a
period of service that began after
September 7, 1980, the veteran must
meet the applicable minimum service
requirements under 38 U.S.C. 5303A.
Authority: (38 U.S.C. 501, 5303A)
3. Amend § 17.37 by adding paragraph
(k) to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 17.37 Enrollment not required—
provision of hospital and outpatient care to
veterans.
■
*
§ 17.110
*
*
*
*
(k) A veteran may receive care for
psychosis or mental illness other than
psychosis pursuant to 38 CFR 17.109.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend § 17.108 by adding
paragraph (d)(12) to read as follows:
§ 17.108 Copayments for inpatient hospital
care and outpatient medical care.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(12) A veteran receiving care for
psychosis or a mental illness other than
psychosis pursuant to § 17.109.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Add § 17.109 to read as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 17.111 Copayments for extended care
services.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(9) A veteran receiving care for
psychosis or a mental illness other than
psychosis pursuant to § 17.109.
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
(a) Psychosis. Eligibility for benefits
under this part is established by this
section for treatment of an active
psychosis, and such condition is
exempted from copayments under
§§ 17.108, 17.110, and 17.111 for any
veteran of World War II, the Korean
conflict, the Vietnam era, or the Persian
Gulf War who developed such
psychosis:
(1) Within 2 years after discharge or
release from the active military, naval,
or air service; and
(2) Before the following date
associated with the war or conflict in
which he or she served:
(i) World War II: July 26, 1949.
(ii) Korean conflict: February 1, 1957.
(iii) Vietnam era: May 8, 1977.
(iv) Persian Gulf War: The end of the
2-year period beginning on the last day
of the Persian Gulf War.
(b) Mental illness (other than
psychosis). Eligibility under this part is
established by this section for treatment
of an active mental illness (other than
psychosis), and such condition is
exempted from copayments under
§§ 17.108, 17.110, and 17.111 for any
veteran of the Persian Gulf War who
developed such mental illness other
than psychosis:
(1) Within 2 years after discharge or
release from the active military, naval,
or air service; and
(2) Before the end of the 2-year period
beginning on the last day of the Persian
Gulf War.
(c) No minimum service required.
Eligibility for care and waiver of
copayments will be established under
this section without regard to the
veteran’s length of active-duty service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(10) A veteran receiving care for
psychosis or a mental illness other than
psychosis pursuant to § 17.109.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 17.111 by adding
paragraph (f)(9) to read as follows:
[FR Doc. 2013–11410 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
§ 17.109 Presumptive eligibility for
psychosis and mental illness other than
psychosis.
Authority: (38 U.S.C. 501, 1702, 5303A)
Copayments for medication.
*
■
■
6. Amend § 17.110 by adding
paragraph (c)(10) to read as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0406; EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0083; FRL–9811–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Dioxide
Ambient Air Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a request
submitted by the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) on
April 15, 2011, and supplemented on
January 30, 2013, to revise the Indiana
state implementation plan (SIP) for
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) under the Clean Air Act
(CAA). This submittal consists of
revisions to the Indiana Administrative
Code (IAC) that amend the national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
for NO2 and SO2 to be consistent with
the NAAQS that EPA promulgated in
2010.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective July 15, 2013, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by June 13,
2013. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Nos. EPA–R05–
OAR–2011–0406, EPA–R05–OAR–
2013–0083 by one of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28143
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section, (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section (AR–
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Regional
Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID Nos. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–
0406, EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0083.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28140-28143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11410]
[[Page 28140]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AN87
Tentative Eligibility Determinations; Presumptive Eligibility for
Psychosis and Other Mental Illness
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
regulation authorizing tentative eligibility determinations to comply
with amended statutory authority concerning minimum active-duty service
requirements. This document also codifies in regulation statutory
presumptions of medical care eligibility for veterans of certain wars
and conflicts who developed psychosis within specified time periods and
for Persian Gulf War veterans who developed a mental illness other than
psychosis within 2 years after service and within 2 years after the end
of the Persian Gulf War period.
DATES: This rule is effective June 13, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin J. Cunningham, Director,
Business Policy, Chief Business Office, Department of Veterans Affairs,
810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420; (202) 461-1599. (This is
not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA is revising 38 CFR 17.34(b) to allow for
tentative eligibility determinations for persons who seek a tentative
eligibility determination for VA health care based on a period of
service that began after September 7, 1980 and meet the minimum service
requirements in 38 U.S.C. 5303A, provided they have filed their
application for VA health care within 6 months after the date of
discharge under conditions other than dishonorable. We are also
revising Sec. 17.34(b) to remove the minimum active-duty period of 6
months for persons who seek a tentative eligibility determination based
on a period of service that began on or before September 7, 1980.
We are also amending VA's regulation on the provision of care to
non-enrolled veterans, 38 CFR 17.37, to include veterans with psychosis
or mental illness other than psychosis. We are establishing a new Sec.
17.109 that codifies for the first time in regulation the two
presumptions of eligibility for medical care based on specific
diagnoses in certain veteran populations, as set forth in 38 U.S.C.
1702(a). Finally, we are amending 38 CFR 17.108, 17.110, and 17.111 to
clearly exempt from any copayment requirement persons eligible for care
under proposed Sec. 17.109.
VA proposed all of these amendments in a document published in the
Federal Register on March 1, 2012 (77 FR 12522). We provided a 60-day
comment period, which ended on April 30, 2012. We received seven
comments from members of the general public.
One commenter requested clarification regarding the purpose of the
regulation. The commenter suggested that VA intended the regulation to
``put an end to `mental illness' claims by Gulf War Vets.''
In response, we assure the commenter that this rulemaking does not
prevent Gulf War veterans, or any veterans, from filing VA benefit
claims. The rulemaking facilitates an eligible veteran's ability to
receive medical care for psychosis and mental illness other than
psychosis. In the proposed rulemaking, we stated that ``the Veterans
Health Administration (VHA) may treat the covered disabilities as if
they were service-connected for purposes of furnishing VHA benefits
and, in turn, determine that no copayment is applicable to the receipt
of such benefits.'' By providing medical care to a veteran before VA
determines that the veteran's psychosis or mental illness other than
psychosis is service-connected, VA is ensuring that the veteran
receives immediate medical treatment for such condition, without
waiting for a determination of service-connection. The immediate
medical treatment will, in turn, enable the veteran to manage his or
her medical condition more effectively.
The commenter also asked whether VA ``want[s] to use this
regulation just for medical decisions.'' The answer is that we do
intend to use this regulation solely for VA medical care eligibility
determinations. Tentative eligibility determinations have no effect on
a determination of actual eligibility for VA medical care or any other
VA benefit. We hope this explanation resolves the commenter's concerns,
and we do not make any changes based on this comment.
Another commenter stated that the ``entire rule should be [re]vised
due to its ineffectiveness to service military personnel suffering from
psychosis.'' The commenter went on to state that the proposed rule did
not consider four factors enumerated by the commenter. The first factor
is that ``having a mental illness is like having a disability.'' The
second factor is that ``the six month rule is insane, no matter the
time one serves this country should not be an issue.'' The third factor
is that ``[t]he manner in which a person was discharged should not be
relevant.'' Lastly, the fourth factor provided by the commenter
indicated that changes should start with addressing ``the understaffed
and unsanitary conditions of some of these facilities.'' We discuss
each of these factors below.
Regarding the commenter's first factor, VA currently rates a
veteran's mental illness in accordance with the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, of the American
Psychiatric Association (DSM-IV), and we recognize mental illness as a
disability that can serve as the basis for an award of service-
connection. See 38 CFR 4.130. In fact, this final rulemaking enables VA
to provide prompt treatment of a veteran's psychosis or mental illness
other than psychosis without waiting for a finding of service-
connection. Providing such treatment will not hinder the process of
determining whether the psychosis or mental illness is service-
connected for VA purposes. In the proposed rulemaking we made clear
that, in many cases, the condition for which the veteran seeks care is
one for which service-connection will probably be established. The aim
of this rulemaking is to make certain that veterans receive prompt
treatment for psychosis or mental illness other than psychosis after
discharge from service. We do not make any changes based on this
comment.
The commenter's second concern is the requirement in Sec.
17.34(b)(1) that a veteran who seeks eligibility based on service
provided on or before September 7, 1980, must have served for a period
of at least 6 months of active duty. Since its promulgation, VA's
regulation governing tentative eligibility determinations included a 6-
month minimum requirement. See 38 CFR 17.35 (1970). However, as
explained in the proposed rule preamble, we proposed to amend Sec.
17.34 to comply with the minimum service requirements contained in 38
U.S.C. 5303A, which apply to veterans who entered active duty after
September 7, 1980. We now remove from Sec. 17.34(b) the 6-month
service requirement for veterans who seek eligibility for VA health
care based on service provided on or before September 7, 1980, in
consideration of the fact that very few, if any, veterans will be
seeking tentative eligibility determinations within 6 months of
discharge for a period of service that began over 32 years ago. The
amount of time that a veteran, who entered active duty after September
7, 1980, must serve on active duty in order to be
[[Page 28141]]
eligible for VA benefits is governed by 38 U.S.C. 5303A. Congress added
a minimum active duty requirement due to concern that some
servicemembers were, through inappropriate or unproductive conduct,
bringing about their early discharges, and that some of them had
enlisted for the purpose of obtaining eligibility for veterans'
benefits based on short periods of service. Congress believed it was
inappropriate to provide veterans' benefits to those who substantially
fail to fulfill their active-duty service commitments. See Senate
Report 97-153, July 8, 1981; See also Public Law 96-342. In particular,
we amend Sec. 17.34(b) to state that tentative eligibility
determinations for VA health care will be made if ``[t]he application
is filed within 6 months after date of discharge under conditions other
than dishonorable, and for a veteran who seeks eligibility based on a
period of service that began after September 7, 1980, the veteran must
meet the applicable minimum service requirements under 38 U.S.C.
5303A.'' For applications for which tentative eligibility cannot be
granted, VA will honor its duty to assist veterans in obtaining
necessary documentation of proof of service or other documentation
necessary to validate eligibility.
Regarding the commenter's third factor, in reference to the
``manner in which a person was discharged,'' the proposed rulemaking
stated that the veteran must have received an honorable discharge to
qualify for tentative eligibility for VA health care. The term
``veteran'' is defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2) as ``a person who served in
the active military, naval, or air service, and who was discharged or
released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable.'' Before
it was amended by this rulemaking, Sec. 17.34(b) stated that tentative
eligibility for VA health care may be authorized if ``[t]he application
was filed within 6 months after date of honorable discharge from a
period of not less than 6 months of active duty.'' Proposed Sec.
17.34(b) retained use of the term ``honorable discharge;'' however, we
agree with the commenter that this may be too restrictive. For example,
a general discharge under honorable conditions technically is not the
same as an ``honorable'' discharge, but it is a discharge that is
``other than dishonorable.'' To limit tentative eligibility to veterans
with an ``honorable discharge'' would exclude some veterans with
discharges that are not dishonorable and whose eligibility ``probably
will be established.'' Therefore, to cover all veterans whose
eligibility for VA health care probably will be established, we amend
Sec. 17.34(b) to state that the application for tentative eligibility
for VA health care must be filed within 6 months after the date of
discharge ``under conditions other than dishonorable.'' This amendment
will also correctly reflect the requirement of the statutory definition
of ``veteran,'' which, as previously stated in this rulemaking,
requires that a person be discharged under conditions other than
dishonorable. For applications for which tentative eligibility cannot
be granted, VA will honor its duty to assist veterans in obtaining
necessary documentation of proof of service or other documentation
necessary to validate eligibility.
The commenter's last factor concerning ``the understaffed and
unsanitary conditions of some of these facilities'' is beyond the scope
of this rulemaking. We do not make any changes based on this comment.
Another commenter suggested that the ``presumptive service be given
for all veterans to whichever is later, the proposed changes or this .
. . within two years of separation from active duty.'' The commenter
cited as an example that ``if the presumptive service-connection was
afforded two years after the veteran retired it would give the veteran
time to come forward with their mental health issues after they have
separated which is more likely the time they would report their
symptoms.'' The purpose and meaning of this comment is unclear.
We believe that the commenter's concern was that the tentative
eligibility determination under Sec. 17.34 should apply if a veteran
submits an application within 2 years after discharge. The 6-month
limitation for tentative eligibility determinations for VA health care
is to afford medical assistance to veterans immediately after discharge
but before they have had sufficient time to file a claim to establish
eligibility as is generally required. If the veteran's psychosis is not
manifested immediately after discharge, but develops within 2 years
after discharge from active duty, the veteran may be eligible for
treatment under new Sec. 17.109, which codifies the statutory
presumptions of eligibility established by Congress at 38 U.S.C. 1702.
The 2-year time period to be eligible to receive medical care under 38
U.S.C. 1702 recognizes that psychosis may take some time to fully
manifest itself. We do not make any changes based on this comment.
A commenter supported the rulemaking and believes that it ``will
bring about needed changes to [the] VA healthcare system.'' The
commenter also stated that ``I do, however, like that there is no
minimum service requirement for length of active-duty in order to
qualify for these benefits.'' The commenter's statement regarding no
minimum active duty service requirement to qualify for benefits is
correct as it applies to Sec. 17.109. However, as previously stated in
this final rulemaking, 38 U.S.C. 5303A establishes a minimum active
duty period for tentative eligibility determinations, as stated in
Sec. 17.34(b).
This same commenter, along with a second commenter, was concerned
with the 2-year time limit in Sec. 17.109 for the development of
psychosis following discharge to establish a presumptive eligibility.
The first commenter stated that the ``patients would have needed to
develop psychosis within 2 years of discharge or after the war/
conflict. My problem with this provision is that illnesses that stem
from a traumatic event, such as psychosis, can develop later in life.''
This first commenter further stated that psychosis does not follow a
calendar. The second commenter stated that ``[d]espite all the advances
in diagnosing and treating mental illnesses, the field is still not
precise in diagnosis.'' This second commenter further stated that the
diagnosis of a mental condition can be subjective, because ``there
isn't always objective empirical evidence.'' Both commenters concluded
that, to address their concerns, VA should extend the 2-year time
limit. However, Congress established the 2-year period at 38 U.S.C.
1702. As previously noted, VA cannot amend a statutory period through
regulation. Therefore, we do not make any changes based on these
comments.
Another commenter stated that VA needs to ``house and care for
basic human conditions, including comprehensive medical and psychiatric
care.'' The commenter suggested that this care could be accomplished
with comprehensive advanced registered nurse practitioners who work
``in the community where these veterans live.'' We appreciate the
commenter taking the time to comment on the rulemaking, however, we
believe that the specific mechanisms for providing care to veterans who
are in need of medical and psychiatric care are beyond the scope of
this rulemaking. We do not make any changes based on this comment.
Finally, one commenter observed an increasing need for mental
health care for veterans. The commenter stated that, although the
``proposed rule would not solve the critical issue of veterans[']
[[Page 28142]]
timely access to mental health care, it is at least a step in the right
direction,'' and ``might simplify the process for soldiers applying for
mental health benefits and care.'' This rulemaking, in conjunction with
other VA outreach and health care services, provides VA with the
flexibility to provide care aimed at improving the mental health of
veterans. The rulemaking also allows for the prompt treatment of
psychosis and other mental conditions immediately after a qualifying
veteran is discharged from service. We agree with the commenter in that
this rulemaking is a step in the right direction for the betterment of
a veteran's mental health. We do not make any changes based on this
comment.
Based on the rationale set forth in the Supplementary Information
to the proposed rule and in this final rule, VA is adopting the
proposed rule as a final rule with the change mentioned above.
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by this
rulemaking, represents VA's implementation of its legal authority on
this subject. Other than future amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance or procedures are authorized.
All existing or subsequent VA guidance must be read to conform with
this rulemaking if possible or, if not possible, such guidance is
superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This final rule will directly affect only individuals and will not
directly affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this rulemaking is exempt from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined, and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This final rule will have no such effect
on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for the programs affected by this document are: 64.009, Veterans
Medical Care Benefits; 64.010, Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.011,
Veterans Dental Care; 64.013, Veterans Prosthetic Appliances; 64.018,
Sharing Specialized Medical Resources; 64.019, Veterans Rehabilitation
Alcohol and Drug Dependence; and 64.022, Veterans Home Based Primary
Care.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D.
Riojas, Interim Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on May 3, 2013, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations,
Government contracts, Grant programs--health, Grant programs--veterans,
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and dental schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in this rulemaking, the Department of
Veterans Affairs amends 38 CFR part 17 as set forth below:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.34 by revising paragraph (b) and adding an authority
citation to read as follows:
Sec. 17.34 Tentative eligibility determinations.
* * * * *
(b) Based on discharge. The application is filed within 6 months
after date of discharge under conditions other than dishonorable, and
for a veteran who seeks eligibility based on a period of service that
began after September 7, 1980, the veteran must meet the applicable
minimum service requirements under 38 U.S.C. 5303A.
Authority: (38 U.S.C. 501, 5303A)
0
3. Amend Sec. 17.37 by adding paragraph (k) to read as follows:
[[Page 28143]]
Sec. 17.37 Enrollment not required--provision of hospital and
outpatient care to veterans.
* * * * *
(k) A veteran may receive care for psychosis or mental illness
other than psychosis pursuant to 38 CFR 17.109.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 17.108 by adding paragraph (d)(12) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.108 Copayments for inpatient hospital care and outpatient
medical care.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(12) A veteran receiving care for psychosis or a mental illness
other than psychosis pursuant to Sec. 17.109.
* * * * *
0
5. Add Sec. 17.109 to read as follows:
Sec. 17.109 Presumptive eligibility for psychosis and mental illness
other than psychosis.
(a) Psychosis. Eligibility for benefits under this part is
established by this section for treatment of an active psychosis, and
such condition is exempted from copayments under Sec. Sec. 17.108,
17.110, and 17.111 for any veteran of World War II, the Korean
conflict, the Vietnam era, or the Persian Gulf War who developed such
psychosis:
(1) Within 2 years after discharge or release from the active
military, naval, or air service; and
(2) Before the following date associated with the war or conflict
in which he or she served:
(i) World War II: July 26, 1949.
(ii) Korean conflict: February 1, 1957.
(iii) Vietnam era: May 8, 1977.
(iv) Persian Gulf War: The end of the 2-year period beginning on
the last day of the Persian Gulf War.
(b) Mental illness (other than psychosis). Eligibility under this
part is established by this section for treatment of an active mental
illness (other than psychosis), and such condition is exempted from
copayments under Sec. Sec. 17.108, 17.110, and 17.111 for any veteran
of the Persian Gulf War who developed such mental illness other than
psychosis:
(1) Within 2 years after discharge or release from the active
military, naval, or air service; and
(2) Before the end of the 2-year period beginning on the last day
of the Persian Gulf War.
(c) No minimum service required. Eligibility for care and waiver of
copayments will be established under this section without regard to the
veteran's length of active-duty service.
Authority: (38 U.S.C. 501, 1702, 5303A)
0
6. Amend Sec. 17.110 by adding paragraph (c)(10) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.110 Copayments for medication.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(10) A veteran receiving care for psychosis or a mental illness
other than psychosis pursuant to Sec. 17.109.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 17.111 by adding paragraph (f)(9) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.111 Copayments for extended care services.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(9) A veteran receiving care for psychosis or a mental illness
other than psychosis pursuant to Sec. 17.109.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-11410 Filed 5-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P