Lamb Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Amendment to the Order To Raise the Assessment Rate, 28121-28124 [2013-11390]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those whose
annual receipts are less than $7,000,000
and small agricultural producers are
defined as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on industry and Committee
data, the average annual price for fresh
Florida tomatoes during the 2011–12
season was approximately $6.62 per 25pound container, and total fresh
shipments for the 2011–12 season were
approximately 38,175,363 25-pound
cartons of tomatoes. Committee data
indicates that approximately 21 percent
of the handlers handle 90 percent of the
total volume shipped. Based on the
average price, about 80 percent of
handlers could be considered small
businesses under SBA’s definition. In
addition, based on production data,
grower prices as reported by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service,
and the total number of Florida tomato
growers, the average annual grower
revenue is below $750,000. Thus, the
majority of handlers and producers of
Florida tomatoes may be classified as
small entities.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2012–13
and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.037 to $0.024 per 25-pound carton of
tomatoes. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2012–13 expenditures of
$1,672,952 and an assessment rate of
$0.024 per 25-pound carton of tomatoes.
The assessment rate of $0.024 is $0.013
lower than the rate previously in effect.
Applying the $0.024 rate per 25-pound
carton assessment rate to the
Committee’s 35 million cartons crop
estimate should provide $840,000, in
assessment income. Income derived
from handler assessments, along with
funds from the Committee’s authorized
reserve, interest income, and funds from
block grants, will be adequate to cover
budgeted expenses. This action will
allow the Committee to reduce its
financial reserve and will help lower
overall industry cost, while still
providing adequate funding to meet
program expenses.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Florida tomato industry and all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the August
22, 2012, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178,
Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are anticipated.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Florida tomato
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
April 9, 2013. No comments were
received. Therefore, for reasons given in
the interim rule, we are adopting the
interim rule as a final rule, without
change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-12-00510001.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, and
the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (78 FR 9307, February 8, 2013)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tomatoes.
PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN
FLORIDA
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 966, which was
published at 78 FR 9307 on February 8,
2013, is adopted as a final rule, without
change.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28121
Dated: May 8, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–11385 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1280
[No. AMS–LS–11–0038]
Lamb Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Amendment to the
Order To Raise the Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Lamb Promotion, Research, and
Information Order (Order) to increase
the assessment rate on all live ovine
animals sold from $0.005 per pound to
$0.007 per pound for producers, feeders,
and seedstock producers, and from
$0.30 per head of ovine animals
purchased for slaughter to $0.42 per
head for first handlers. The increase is
provided for under the Order, which is
authorized by the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411–7425).
The American Lamb Board (Board),
which administers the Order,
recommended this action to maintain
and expand their promotional, research,
advertising, and communications
programs.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective June 13, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily DeBord, Agricultural Marketing
Specialist, Research and Promotion
Division, on 202–690–2611, fax 202–
720–1125, or by email at
Emily.DeBord@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has waived the review process
required by Executive Order (E.O.)
12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform.
The rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect and will not affect or
preempt any other State or Federal law
authorizing promotion or research
relating to an agricultural commodity.
Under section 519 of the Act a person
subject to the Order may file a petition
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
28122
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
with the Secretary of Agriculture
(Secretary) stating that the Order, any
provision of the Order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the Order
is not established in accordance with
the law, and may request a modification
of the Order or an exemption from the
Order. Any petition filed challenging
the Order, any provision of the Order,
or any obligation imposed in connection
with the Order, shall be filed within 2
years after the effective date of the
Order, provision, or obligation subject to
challenge in the petition. The petitioner
will have the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. Thereafter, the Secretary
will issue a ruling on the petition.
The Act provides that the district
court of the United States for any
district in which the petitioner resides
or conducts business shall have the
jurisdiction to review a final ruling on
the petition if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later
than 20 days after the date of the entry
of the Secretary’s final ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Administrator of
the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic
effect of this action on small entities and
has determined that this final rule will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory action to the scale of
businesses subject to such action in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly burdened.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
(Department) National Agricultural
Statistics Service estimated that in 2012
the number of operations in the United
States with sheep totaled approximately
79,500. The majority of these operations
that are subject to the Order may be
classified as small entities.
The Small Business Administration
defines, in 13 CFR Part 121, small
agricultural producers as those having
annual receipts of no more than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms (handlers and importers) as those
having annual receipts of no more than
$7 million. Under these definitions, the
majority of the producers, feeders,
seedstock producers, and first handlers
that will be affected by this final rule are
considered small entities.
Funds collected under the programs
are used for promotion, information,
research, and advertising of American
lamb and for the administration,
maintenance, and functioning of the
Board. At the current assessment rate of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
one-half of a cent ($0.005) per pound on
all live lambs sold by producers,
feeders, and seedstock producers and
thirty cents ($0.30) per head of lamb
purchased by first handlers for
slaughter, the program generates about
$1.8 million in annual revenues. The
current assessment rate was established
in April 11, 2002, when the Order was
issued (70 FR 17848). The Order is
administered by the Board under
Department oversight. According to the
Board, additional revenue is required in
order to sustain and expand the
promotional, research, advertising, and
communications programs.
On May 26, 2011, the Board passed a
motion to raise the assessment rate as
authorized under the Act and Order (7
CFR Part 1280). This final rule is
consistent with section 1280.217(e) of
the Order, which states that the rate of
assessment for producers, seedstock
producers, and feeders may be raised or
lowered no more than twentyhundredths of a cent ($0.002) in any one
year. In addition, section 1280.219
states the rate of assessment for first
handlers shall be increased or decreased
proportionately if the assessment paid
by producers, feeders, and seedstock
producers is increased or decreased.
The current rate producers pay on a per
pound basis, $0.005 per pound, is 16.7
percent of the rate first handlers pay on
a per head basis, $0.30 per head. To
keep the same proportionality when
producers are assessed a rate of $0.007
per pound, the first handlers will be
assessed a rate of $0.42 per head.
Currently, section 1280.217 of the Order
states that the rate of assessment shall
be one-half of a cent ($0.005) per pound
on all live lambs sold. Section 1280.219
currently states each first handler, in
addition to remitting the assessment
collected pursuant to section 1280.217,
shall pay an assessment equal to thirty
cents ($0.30) per head of lambs
purchased by the first handler for
slaughter or slaughtered by such first
handler pursuant to a custom slaughter
arrangement. This final rule will amend
the aforementioned sections.
The Board’s most recent return on
investment study, Analyzing the
Effectiveness of the Lamb Promotion,
Research, and Information Order, by
Oral Capps, Jr. and Gary W. Williams,
showed that for the period 2002 through
2010 the Lamb Checkoff Program
continued to enhance the demand for
American lamb. The analysis shows that
the Board’s promotion programs have
generated roughly 7.1 to 7.5 additional
pounds of total lamb consumption per
dollar spent on advertising and
promotion and $37.16 to $39.34 in
additional lamb sales per dollar spent
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on advertising and promotion. Copies of
this study can be obtained from the
Board.
Over the last several fiscal years,
however, several trends have asserted
downward pressure on the Board’s
continued ability to sustain the
industry’s recognized high level of
return. Domestic lamb production levels
have continued to decrease. A growing
percentage of domestic lamb is being
sold into non-traditional markets and
higher costs driven by worldwide
inflation have increased the expense of
implementing Board programs. The
Board’s assessment collections have
continued to decrease from $2.8 million
in 2003 to $1.9 million in 2012. Over
the past few years the Board’s budget
has decreased and business costs have
increased. The Board has explored ways
to maintain effective programs by
cutting programs that are not meeting
the Board’s expectations. The Board
believes that marketing and promotions
programs should not be reduced any
further at a time when it is critical for
the industry to protect American lamb’s
position in retail and foodservice and
maintain market share.
The Board states that the proposed
assessment rate increase would enable it
to maintain, enhance, and expand its
efforts to build demand, increase
awareness, and create preference for
American lamb through targeted
advertising, retail promotions, public
relations campaigns and media
outreach, foodservice programs,
consumer events, social marketing, and
nutrition education. The Board strongly
believes that it is a critical time for the
industry to protect their position in
retail and foodservice and maintain
market share in order for there to be a
future for domestic lamb. The Board
believes that it is essential to increase
the lamb checkoff revenue and get its
marketing and promotion budget back to
the original budget levels in fiscal years
2003 and 2004 in order to maintain its
efforts to promote American lamb and
deliver a good return on the industry’s
investment.
This final rule does not impose
additional recordkeeping requirements
on producers, feeders, seedstock
producers, or first handlers of American
lamb. There are no Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule. In accordance with OMB
regulation (5 CFR part 1320), which
implements the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements have been
approved previously under OMB
control number 0581–0093. This final
rule does not result in a change to the
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The Act provides for the creation of,
and amendments to, the Order. The
Order provides in section 1280.210 that
the Board shall have the powers and
duties to recommend to the Secretary
such amendments to the Order as the
Board considers appropriate.
Background and Final Action
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements previously
approved.
We have performed this initial RFA
regarding the impact of this final
amendment to the Order on small
entities.
Comments
On June 12, 2012, the Department
published in the Federal Register (77
FR 34868) for public comment a
proposed rule to amend the Order to
increase the assessment rate on all live
ovine animals sold from $0.005 to
$0.007 per pound for producers, feeders,
and seedstock producers, and from
$0.30 to $0.42 per head for first
handlers. Comments were due to the
Department by August 13, 2012.
The Department received 121 timely
comments related to the proposed rule,
of which 94, or 77.7% were in support
of the assessment rate increase, and 26,
or 21.5%, were opposed to the increase.
One comment was neither for nor
against the increase, and four
comments, which generally reflected the
views of those who supported the
increase, were received after the closing
date. Commenters included producers,
feeders, seedstock producers, first
handlers, and other interested parties.
Commenters supporting the
assessment rate increase pointed to the
need to raise sufficient funding for lamb
promotions in the face of rising costs.
Many noted that the assessment rate had
not been increased during the past
decade and that the increase would
restore marketing funding to earlier
levels. Several commenters suggested
that the lamb industry would lose share
of voice in the market without increased
funding. Commenters also noted that
the rate increase would offset the
decline in lamb inventories across the
country. Other commenters pointed out
that the lamb industry increasingly was
being outspent by competing meats and
international competitors in marketing
activities.
Commenters who opposed the
assessment rate increase cited the
decline of the industry (lamb numbers
falling; prices not competitive with
imported lamb meat). Many suggested
that lamb producers were losing money
and could not afford the additional cost.
Several commenters based their
opposition to the rate increase on their
belief that the Lamb Checkoff has not
been driving increased lamb
consumption. Two commenters noted
that the lamb industry is too diversified
for the generic checkoff program to be
successful.
AMS has carefully considered all
comments submitted and is not making
Under the Order, which became
effective April 11, 2002, the Board
administers a nationally coordinated
program of research, development,
advertising, and promotion designed to
strengthen the position of, and to
develop and expand the markets for,
ovine animals and ovine products. This
program is currently financed by
assessments from producers, feeders,
and seedstock producers who pay an
assessment of one-half cent ($0.005) per
pound when live ovine animals are
sold. First handlers, primarily packers,
pay an additional $0.30 per head on
ovine animals purchased for slaughter.
Importers are not assessed.
This final rule will increase the
assessment rate on all live lambs sold
from $0.005 per pound to $0.007 per
pound for producers, feeders, and
seedstock producers and from $0.30 per
head of lamb purchased for slaughter to
$0.42 per head for first handlers.
According to the Board, in order to
sustain and expand the promotion,
research, and communications programs
at present levels, the Board contends
that additional revenue is required. The
assessment rate increase is estimated to
generate $700,000 in new revenue,
depending upon production levels.
The Board’s budget is based on the
amount of assessments collected on an
annual basis. As assessments have
continued to decline, the Board’s budget
has decreased from $2.8 million in 2003
to $1.9 million in 2012. As expenses to
successfully promote and increase the
consumption of American lamb
continue to rise, the Board believes it is
necessary to amend the Order to
increase the rate of assessment.
On May 26, 2011, the Board
unanimously approved a motion to
request that the Secretary amend
sections 1280.217 (e) and 1280.219 of
the Order to increase the assessment
rate on all live lambs sold from $0.005
per pound to $0.007 per pound for
producers, feeders, and seedstock
producers and from $0.30 per head of
lamb purchased for slaughter to $0.42
per head for first handlers. The Board
has not amended the Order to raise or
lower the assessment rate since the
inception of the program. The vote to
recommend the assessment increase was
unanimous.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28123
any changes to the proposed rule. As
has been stated previously in this
rulemaking, in the Board’s view, it is a
critical time for the lamb industry to
protect its position in retail and
foodservice, and maintain market share,
in order for there to be a future for
domestic lamb. Therefore, it is essential
to increase the lamb checkoff revenue
and get its marketing and promotion
budget back to the original budget levels
in fiscal years 2003 and 2004 in order
to maintain the Board’s efforts to
promote American lamb and deliver a
good return on the industry’s
investment.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1280
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Marketing agreements, Lamb
and Lamb products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
this final rule amends 7 CFR part 1280
as follows:
PART 1280—LAMB PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1280 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
2. In § 1280.217, paragraph (e) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 1280.217
Lamb purchases.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Rate. Except as otherwise
provided, the rate of assessment shall be
seven-tenths of a cent ($0.007) per
pound on all live lambs sold. The rate
of assessment may be raised or lowered
no more than twenty-hundredths of a
cent ($0.002) in any one year. The Board
may recommend any change to the
Department. Prior to a change in the
assessment rate, the Department will
provide notice by publishing in the
Federal Register any proposed changes
with interested parties allowed to
provide comment.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 1280.219 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 1280.219
First handlers.
Each first handler, in addition to
remitting the assessment collected
pursuant to § 1280.217, shall pay an
assessment equal to forty-two cents
($0.42) per head of lambs purchased by
the first handler for slaughter or
slaughtered by such first handler
pursuant to a custom slaughter
arrangement. The rates of assessment for
first handlers shall be increased or
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
28124
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
decreased proportionately if the
assessment paid by producers,
seedstock producers, and feeders is
increased or decreased. Such
assessment shall be remitted with the
assessments collected pursuant to
§ 1280.217.
attorneys 1 and accredited
representatives 2 who practice before
EOIR’s immigration courts and the
Board.3 See 78 FR 19400 (April 1, 2013).
The final rule amends 8 CFR part 1292
by establishing a new paragraph in
§ 1292.1(f) that provides for attorneys
and accredited representatives to
register electronically with EOIR in
order to practice before its immigration
courts and the Board.
eRegistry is part of a long-term agency
plan to create an electronic case access
and filing system for the immigration
courts and the Board. The eRegistry will
individually and uniquely identify each
registered attorney or accredited
representative and associate the
information provided during
registration with that attorney or
accredited representative. This will
increase efficiency by reducing system
errors in scheduling matters and
providing improved notice to attorneys
and accredited representatives. Further,
registration will ultimately enable an
electronic filing system that will reduce
the time and expense presently incurred
with paper filings.
Dated: May 8, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–11390 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Executive Office for Immigration
Review
8 CFR Part 1292
[Docket No. EOIR 138]
RIN 1125–AA39
Registry for Attorneys and
Representatives
Executive Office for
Immigration Review, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Notice of implementation of
registration requirement.
AGENCY:
II. Who Must Register
The Executive Office for
Immigration Review (EOIR) has
established a mandatory electronic
registry for attorneys and accredited
representatives who practice before
EOIR’s immigration courts and Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board).
This notice provides additional
instructions regarding the registration
process.
SUMMARY:
Attorneys and accredited
representatives will be able to register
beginning on June 10, 2013. After
December 10, 2013, attorneys and
accredited representatives must be
registered in order to practice before
EOIR’s immigration courts and the
Board and may be subject to
administrative suspension for failure to
register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Rosenblum, General Counsel, Executive
Office for Immigration Review, 5107
Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, Falls Church,
Virginia 22041, telephone (703) 305–
0470 (not a toll-free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
I. Background
On April 1, 2013, the Department
published in the Federal Register a final
rule that establishes a mandatory
electronic registry (eRegistry) for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
All attorneys and accredited
representatives who practice before
EOIR’s immigration courts or the Board
must register with EOIR’s eRegistry. See
8 CFR 1292.1(a)(1), (a)(4), (f). At this
time, the electronic registration
requirements apply only to attorneys
and to accredited representatives who
are authorized to appear before EOIR.
(This includes attorneys and accredited
representatives who appear before both
EOIR and DHS, but the registration
requirements only pertain to their
practice before EOIR.) Accordingly,
accredited representatives authorized to
appear only before DHS, law students,
law graduates, reputable individuals, or
accredited foreign government officials
will not be able to register at this time.
1 For purposes of this notice, the term ‘‘attorney’’
refers to any individual meeting the definition of
‘‘attorney’’ in 8 CFR 1001.1(f), except any attorney
who represents the Federal Government before
EOIR.
2 An accredited representative is a non-attorney
who is designated by a recognized organization and
accredited by the Board pursuant to 8 CFR
1292.2(d) to represent individuals before the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), or before
both DHS and EOIR. All accredited representatives
must be affiliated with an organization established
in the United States that has received recognition
by the Board pursuant to 8 CFR 1292.2(a). For
purposes of this notice, the term ‘‘accredited
representative’’ refers only to an accredited
representative who is accredited to appear before
both EOIR and DHS. See 8 CFR 1292.2(d).
3 The electronic registration requirement does not
apply to representatives who appear before EOIR’s
Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Similarly, law firms and recognized
organizations will not be able to register.
III. How To Register
Registration is a two-step process,
which consists of an online registration
and an identity validation. Both steps
must be completed in order for an
attorney or accredited representative to
be registered before EOIR.
Attorneys and accredited
representatives will begin the online
registration process by selecting their
relevant account type, creating an
individual UserID and password, and
providing answers to password-related
security questions.4 Thereafter,
attorneys and accredited representatives
will follow on-screen instructions to
enter and submit the requested
information. After registering, a registry
applicant will need to appear at an
immigration court location or the Board
to present photo identification, so that
EOIR can verify the applicant’s identity.
Once that step is completed, EOIR will
notify the registrant that his or her
account has been activated.
Attorneys will be required to provide
the following information when
registering: full name; date of birth;
business address(es); business telephone
number(s); email address(es)5; and bar
admission information for all the
jurisdictions in which they are licensed
to practice, including those in which
they are inactive. If they are licensed in
a jurisdiction that does not provide bar
numbers, they will not be required to
submit a bar number for that
jurisdiction. Attorneys may also enter
the name of their business or law firm.
Accredited representatives will be
required to provide the following
information when registering: full name;
date of birth; business address(es);
business telephone number(s); email
address(es); and name(s) of all the
recognized organization(s) that have
obtained accreditation for the
representative to appear before EOIR.
EOIR will process the submitted
information and then communicate with
the registry applicant via email. First,
EOIR will send an email to the registry
applicant with instructions for the
identity validation process.6 After the
4 A registered attorney or accredited
representative will be able to provide the answers
to these questions in order to reset a forgotten
password.
5 Registrants will be able to provide more than
one email address, when appropriate, i.e., an email
address for eRegistry account-related emails and an
email address for case specific correspondence.
6 As indicated in the final rule, registry applicants
will be able to appear at an immigration court or
the Board’s Clerk’s Office to present specified photo
identification, so that EOIR can verify the
registrant’s identity. In addition, EOIR anticipates
E:\FR\FM\14MYR1.SGM
14MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28121-28124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11390]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1280
[No. AMS-LS-11-0038]
Lamb Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Amendment to the
Order To Raise the Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Lamb Promotion, Research, and
Information Order (Order) to increase the assessment rate on all live
ovine animals sold from $0.005 per pound to $0.007 per pound for
producers, feeders, and seedstock producers, and from $0.30 per head of
ovine animals purchased for slaughter to $0.42 per head for first
handlers. The increase is provided for under the Order, which is
authorized by the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of
1996 (Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425). The American Lamb Board (Board), which
administers the Order, recommended this action to maintain and expand
their promotional, research, advertising, and communications programs.
DATES: Effective June 13, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily DeBord, Agricultural Marketing
Specialist, Research and Promotion Division, on 202-690-2611, fax 202-
720-1125, or by email at Emily.DeBord@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has waived the review
process required by Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under E.O. 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. The rule is not intended to have retroactive effect and will
not affect or preempt any other State or Federal law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an agricultural commodity.
Under section 519 of the Act a person subject to the Order may file
a petition
[[Page 28122]]
with the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) stating that the Order,
any provision of the Order, or any obligation imposed in connection
with the Order is not established in accordance with the law, and may
request a modification of the Order or an exemption from the Order. Any
petition filed challenging the Order, any provision of the Order, or
any obligation imposed in connection with the Order, shall be filed
within 2 years after the effective date of the Order, provision, or
obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, the
Secretary will issue a ruling on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court of the United States for
any district in which the petitioner resides or conducts business shall
have the jurisdiction to review a final ruling on the petition if the
petitioner files a complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of the Secretary's final ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator of the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic effect
of this action on small entities and has determined that this final
rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory action to
the scale of businesses subject to such action in order that small
businesses will not be unduly burdened.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (Department) National
Agricultural Statistics Service estimated that in 2012 the number of
operations in the United States with sheep totaled approximately
79,500. The majority of these operations that are subject to the Order
may be classified as small entities.
The Small Business Administration defines, in 13 CFR Part 121,
small agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of no more
than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms (handlers and
importers) as those having annual receipts of no more than $7 million.
Under these definitions, the majority of the producers, feeders,
seedstock producers, and first handlers that will be affected by this
final rule are considered small entities.
Funds collected under the programs are used for promotion,
information, research, and advertising of American lamb and for the
administration, maintenance, and functioning of the Board. At the
current assessment rate of one-half of a cent ($0.005) per pound on all
live lambs sold by producers, feeders, and seedstock producers and
thirty cents ($0.30) per head of lamb purchased by first handlers for
slaughter, the program generates about $1.8 million in annual revenues.
The current assessment rate was established in April 11, 2002, when the
Order was issued (70 FR 17848). The Order is administered by the Board
under Department oversight. According to the Board, additional revenue
is required in order to sustain and expand the promotional, research,
advertising, and communications programs.
On May 26, 2011, the Board passed a motion to raise the assessment
rate as authorized under the Act and Order (7 CFR Part 1280). This
final rule is consistent with section 1280.217(e) of the Order, which
states that the rate of assessment for producers, seedstock producers,
and feeders may be raised or lowered no more than twenty-hundredths of
a cent ($0.002) in any one year. In addition, section 1280.219 states
the rate of assessment for first handlers shall be increased or
decreased proportionately if the assessment paid by producers, feeders,
and seedstock producers is increased or decreased. The current rate
producers pay on a per pound basis, $0.005 per pound, is 16.7 percent
of the rate first handlers pay on a per head basis, $0.30 per head. To
keep the same proportionality when producers are assessed a rate of
$0.007 per pound, the first handlers will be assessed a rate of $0.42
per head. Currently, section 1280.217 of the Order states that the rate
of assessment shall be one-half of a cent ($0.005) per pound on all
live lambs sold. Section 1280.219 currently states each first handler,
in addition to remitting the assessment collected pursuant to section
1280.217, shall pay an assessment equal to thirty cents ($0.30) per
head of lambs purchased by the first handler for slaughter or
slaughtered by such first handler pursuant to a custom slaughter
arrangement. This final rule will amend the aforementioned sections.
The Board's most recent return on investment study, Analyzing the
Effectiveness of the Lamb Promotion, Research, and Information Order,
by Oral Capps, Jr. and Gary W. Williams, showed that for the period
2002 through 2010 the Lamb Checkoff Program continued to enhance the
demand for American lamb. The analysis shows that the Board's promotion
programs have generated roughly 7.1 to 7.5 additional pounds of total
lamb consumption per dollar spent on advertising and promotion and
$37.16 to $39.34 in additional lamb sales per dollar spent on
advertising and promotion. Copies of this study can be obtained from
the Board.
Over the last several fiscal years, however, several trends have
asserted downward pressure on the Board's continued ability to sustain
the industry's recognized high level of return. Domestic lamb
production levels have continued to decrease. A growing percentage of
domestic lamb is being sold into non-traditional markets and higher
costs driven by worldwide inflation have increased the expense of
implementing Board programs. The Board's assessment collections have
continued to decrease from $2.8 million in 2003 to $1.9 million in
2012. Over the past few years the Board's budget has decreased and
business costs have increased. The Board has explored ways to maintain
effective programs by cutting programs that are not meeting the Board's
expectations. The Board believes that marketing and promotions programs
should not be reduced any further at a time when it is critical for the
industry to protect American lamb's position in retail and foodservice
and maintain market share.
The Board states that the proposed assessment rate increase would
enable it to maintain, enhance, and expand its efforts to build demand,
increase awareness, and create preference for American lamb through
targeted advertising, retail promotions, public relations campaigns and
media outreach, foodservice programs, consumer events, social
marketing, and nutrition education. The Board strongly believes that it
is a critical time for the industry to protect their position in retail
and foodservice and maintain market share in order for there to be a
future for domestic lamb. The Board believes that it is essential to
increase the lamb checkoff revenue and get its marketing and promotion
budget back to the original budget levels in fiscal years 2003 and 2004
in order to maintain its efforts to promote American lamb and deliver a
good return on the industry's investment.
This final rule does not impose additional recordkeeping
requirements on producers, feeders, seedstock producers, or first
handlers of American lamb. There are no Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule. In accordance with OMB regulation
(5 CFR part 1320), which implements the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the information collection and recordkeeping
requirements have been approved previously under OMB control number
0581-0093. This final rule does not result in a change to the
[[Page 28123]]
information collection and recordkeeping requirements previously
approved.
We have performed this initial RFA regarding the impact of this
final amendment to the Order on small entities.
Background and Final Action
Under the Order, which became effective April 11, 2002, the Board
administers a nationally coordinated program of research, development,
advertising, and promotion designed to strengthen the position of, and
to develop and expand the markets for, ovine animals and ovine
products. This program is currently financed by assessments from
producers, feeders, and seedstock producers who pay an assessment of
one-half cent ($0.005) per pound when live ovine animals are sold.
First handlers, primarily packers, pay an additional $0.30 per head on
ovine animals purchased for slaughter. Importers are not assessed.
This final rule will increase the assessment rate on all live lambs
sold from $0.005 per pound to $0.007 per pound for producers, feeders,
and seedstock producers and from $0.30 per head of lamb purchased for
slaughter to $0.42 per head for first handlers. According to the Board,
in order to sustain and expand the promotion, research, and
communications programs at present levels, the Board contends that
additional revenue is required. The assessment rate increase is
estimated to generate $700,000 in new revenue, depending upon
production levels.
The Board's budget is based on the amount of assessments collected
on an annual basis. As assessments have continued to decline, the
Board's budget has decreased from $2.8 million in 2003 to $1.9 million
in 2012. As expenses to successfully promote and increase the
consumption of American lamb continue to rise, the Board believes it is
necessary to amend the Order to increase the rate of assessment.
On May 26, 2011, the Board unanimously approved a motion to request
that the Secretary amend sections 1280.217 (e) and 1280.219 of the
Order to increase the assessment rate on all live lambs sold from
$0.005 per pound to $0.007 per pound for producers, feeders, and
seedstock producers and from $0.30 per head of lamb purchased for
slaughter to $0.42 per head for first handlers. The Board has not
amended the Order to raise or lower the assessment rate since the
inception of the program. The vote to recommend the assessment increase
was unanimous.
The Act provides for the creation of, and amendments to, the Order.
The Order provides in section 1280.210 that the Board shall have the
powers and duties to recommend to the Secretary such amendments to the
Order as the Board considers appropriate.
Comments
On June 12, 2012, the Department published in the Federal Register
(77 FR 34868) for public comment a proposed rule to amend the Order to
increase the assessment rate on all live ovine animals sold from $0.005
to $0.007 per pound for producers, feeders, and seedstock producers,
and from $0.30 to $0.42 per head for first handlers. Comments were due
to the Department by August 13, 2012.
The Department received 121 timely comments related to the proposed
rule, of which 94, or 77.7% were in support of the assessment rate
increase, and 26, or 21.5%, were opposed to the increase. One comment
was neither for nor against the increase, and four comments, which
generally reflected the views of those who supported the increase, were
received after the closing date. Commenters included producers,
feeders, seedstock producers, first handlers, and other interested
parties.
Commenters supporting the assessment rate increase pointed to the
need to raise sufficient funding for lamb promotions in the face of
rising costs. Many noted that the assessment rate had not been
increased during the past decade and that the increase would restore
marketing funding to earlier levels. Several commenters suggested that
the lamb industry would lose share of voice in the market without
increased funding. Commenters also noted that the rate increase would
offset the decline in lamb inventories across the country. Other
commenters pointed out that the lamb industry increasingly was being
outspent by competing meats and international competitors in marketing
activities.
Commenters who opposed the assessment rate increase cited the
decline of the industry (lamb numbers falling; prices not competitive
with imported lamb meat). Many suggested that lamb producers were
losing money and could not afford the additional cost. Several
commenters based their opposition to the rate increase on their belief
that the Lamb Checkoff has not been driving increased lamb consumption.
Two commenters noted that the lamb industry is too diversified for the
generic checkoff program to be successful.
AMS has carefully considered all comments submitted and is not
making any changes to the proposed rule. As has been stated previously
in this rulemaking, in the Board's view, it is a critical time for the
lamb industry to protect its position in retail and foodservice, and
maintain market share, in order for there to be a future for domestic
lamb. Therefore, it is essential to increase the lamb checkoff revenue
and get its marketing and promotion budget back to the original budget
levels in fiscal years 2003 and 2004 in order to maintain the Board's
efforts to promote American lamb and deliver a good return on the
industry's investment.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1280
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Marketing agreements, Lamb and Lamb products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, this final rule amends 7 CFR
part 1280 as follows:
PART 1280--LAMB PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1280 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. In Sec. 1280.217, paragraph (e) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1280.217 Lamb purchases.
* * * * *
(e) Rate. Except as otherwise provided, the rate of assessment
shall be seven-tenths of a cent ($0.007) per pound on all live lambs
sold. The rate of assessment may be raised or lowered no more than
twenty-hundredths of a cent ($0.002) in any one year. The Board may
recommend any change to the Department. Prior to a change in the
assessment rate, the Department will provide notice by publishing in
the Federal Register any proposed changes with interested parties
allowed to provide comment.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 1280.219 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1280.219 First handlers.
Each first handler, in addition to remitting the assessment
collected pursuant to Sec. 1280.217, shall pay an assessment equal to
forty-two cents ($0.42) per head of lambs purchased by the first
handler for slaughter or slaughtered by such first handler pursuant to
a custom slaughter arrangement. The rates of assessment for first
handlers shall be increased or
[[Page 28124]]
decreased proportionately if the assessment paid by producers,
seedstock producers, and feeders is increased or decreased. Such
assessment shall be remitted with the assessments collected pursuant to
Sec. 1280.217.
Dated: May 8, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-11390 Filed 5-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P