Regulated Navigation Area; Southern Oahu Tsunami Vessel Evacuation; Honolulu, HI, 28170-28173 [2013-11233]
Download as PDF
28170
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is will be
enforced from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. on
September 1, 2013.
Dated: April 25, 2013.
D.W. Pearson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Juan.
[FR Doc. 2013–11360 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0080]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Southern
Oahu Tsunami Vessel Evacuation;
Honolulu, HI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes a
permanent regulated navigation area
(RNA), enforcement of which would
take place only during times when a
tsunami warning is issued for the
Hawaiian Islands by the Pacific
Tsunami Warning Center. Tsunami
warnings require the evacuation of a
large number of vessels from their
respective harbors. Following the
evacuation, these vessels must remain
offshore until the emergency situation
has passed and the harbors have been
deemed safe for re-entry. Past tsunami
warnings have created potentially
dangerous offshore traffic congestion
between commercial and recreational
vessel traffic. Because of this,
designated vessel traffic staging areas
are necessary for a safe and orderly
evacuation of Southern Oahu ports.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0080 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email Lieutenant Commander Scott
Whaley of the United States Coast
Guard Sector Honolulu at 808–522–
8264 ext.352 or
Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil, respectively.
If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to respond to this
notice by submitting comments and
related materials. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal information you
have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission. To submit your comment
online, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number USCG–2012–0080 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box, and then click
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2012–0080 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’
box, and then click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain in detail why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid in
solving this problem, we will hold one
at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The statutory basis for this
rulemaking is 33 U.S.C. 1231, which
gives the Coast Guard, under a
delegation from the Secretary of
Homeland Security, regulatory authority
to enforce the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act. A regulated navigation area
is a water area within a defined
boundary for which regulations for
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
vessels navigating within the area have
been established to mitigate hazardous
conditions deemed to exist in that area.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
provide greater safety for vessels and
maritime commerce in the event of a
tsunami threat.
Earthquakes off Chile and Japan in
February 2010 and March 2011,
respectively, resulted in tsunami threats
to the Main Hawaiian Islands. These
incidents emphasized the need to
establish heightened safety measures, to
ensure an orderly and organized
evacuation plan, in order to protect the
infrastructure of the southern coast of
Oahu, Hawaii, including Honolulu
Harbor. Honolulu Harbor has only one
entrance for large commercial vessels
and is the principle harbor of Hawaii’s
hub and spoke maritime commerce
system. If, during an emergency, a
marine incident were to occur off the
southern shore of Oahu, especially near
the entrance of Honolulu Harbor, the
results could be devastating to Hawaii’s
economy and the maritime commerce
system and the constituencies that rely
heavily upon the system’s viability.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
In response to this risk, the Coast
Guard proposes to establish a regulated
navigation area designated as the
Southern Oahu Tsunami Evacuation
zone.
The Coast Guard has collaborated
with the Hawaii Ocean Safety Team, the
Industry Advisory Board, and other
industry partners in the development of
this rule. All recommendations have
received careful consideration during
the drafting of this rule. This rule
accurately reflects the best practices as
recommended by Hawaii’s professional
mariners.
In the event of a tsunami warning, the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port for
Honolulu (COTP) would notify the
public that an enforcement period is in
effect for the duration of the emergency
for this RNA. At the conclusion of the
treat, the COTP would notify the public
when the RNA enforcement period is
suspended or terminated.
During the enforcement period, the
COTP would deploy Coast Guard assets
to ensure participating commercial and
recreational vessels move to and stay
within separate staging areas, and
seaward of the 50 fathom curve that
covers near-shore waters less than 300
feet deep. Coast Guard plans, which
could vary depending on specific
conditions during an actual emergency,
call for those staging areas to be
separated by an exclusionary area. This
exclusionary area would measure 3.7
nautical miles long by one (1) nautical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
mile wide, centering lengthwise and
along a line running seaward at 208
degrees southwest of the Honolulu
Harbor Range light. Commercial vessels
would have to stay west of the
exclusionary area, and recreational
vessels would have to stay east of the
exclusionary area.
A graphic of the regulated navigation
area is in the docket (see the ‘‘Viewing
comments and documents’’ section of
this NPRM). It shows how we expect to
separate commercial and recreational
vessels when we would enforce the
RNA, but under actual enforcement
conditions local commanders could
make alternate arrangements as those
conditions warrant.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, because it would
have an effect on the regulated public
only in the rare circumstances of a
tsunami threat, while at other times
vessels will be able to transit the area
freely. Therefore, it does not require an
assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
2. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because it would have an effect on the
regulated public only in the rare
circumstances of a tsunami threat, while
at other times vessels will be able to
transit the area freely.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28171
this rule would economically affect it.
Before the effective period, we will
issue maritime advisories widely
available to the Oahu maritime,
commercial, and tourist communities.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Lieutenant
Commander Scott Whaley, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Honolulu, at 808–522–8264 ext.
352, or at Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil via
email. If you wish to comment on
actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–
734–3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
28172
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Heath Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866 and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Further,
the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated this as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule is
12. Energy Effects
categorically excluded from further
We have analyzed this proposed rule
review under paragraph (34)(g) of Figure
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
Concerning Regulations That
environmental analysis checklist and a
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
categorical exclusion determination are
Distribution, or Use. An action is a
available in the docket where indicated
‘‘significant energy action’’ under E.O.
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
13211 if the action is (1) an agency
comments or information that may lead
action, (2) which is or will lead to a final to the discovery of a significant
rule, and is either (3a) a ‘‘significant
environmental impact from this
regulatory action’’ under Executive
proposed rule.
Order 12866 AND is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
distribution, or use of energy OR (3b)
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
has been designated a ‘‘significant
requirements, Security measures,
energy action by the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory Waterways.
Affairs. We have determined that it is
For the reasons discussed in the
not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
that order because it is not a ‘‘significant amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 May 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.1413 to read as follows:
§ 165.1413 Regulated navigation area;
Southern Oahu Tsunami Evacuation;
Honolulu, Hawaii.
(a) Location. The following area is a
regulated navigation area (RNA): All
waters contained within an area
composing of an area on the southern
side of Oahu, HI. The RNA extends from
the surface of the water to the ocean
floor and is bound by the following
points: 21°17′14″ N, 157°55′34″ W,
21°13′30″ N, 157°55′34″ W; 21°13′30″ N,
157°48′20″ W; 21°15′10″ N, 157°48′20″
W thence westward along the 50 fathom
curve to the beginning point. These
coordinates are based upon the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Coast Survey, Pacific
Ocean, Oahu, Hawaii, chart 19357.
(b) Regulations. You may contact the
Coast Guard on VHF Channel 16
(156.800 MHz) or at telephone number
808–842–2600, to obtain clarification on
RNA transits and locations. Coast Guard
patrol boats will be enforcing the RNA
and providing on-scene direction.
During the enforcement period persons
and vessels wishing to remain inside the
RNA must abide by the following
stipulations:
(1) No person or vessel may enter into
an exclusionary area 3.7 nautical miles
long by one (1) nautical miles wide,
centered lengthwise and along a line
running seaward at 208 degrees
southwest of Honolulu Harbor Front
Range Light, except to transit to or from
the staging areas or other areas outside
the zone. Loitering or lingering in the
exclusionary zone is prohibited.
(2) All recreational vessels wishing to
remain in the RNA must transit to and
stage east of the exclusionary area,
while all commercial vessels wishing to
remain in the RNA must transit to and
stage west of the exclusionary area.
(3) All vessels staging in the RNA
must be seaward of the 50 fathom (300
foot) curve.
(c) Enforcement period. Paragraph (b)
of this section will be enforced only
when a tsunami warning has been
issued for the Hawaiian Islands by the
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center. The
COTP will notify the public of any
enforcement, suspension of
enforcement, or termination of
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules
enforcement through appropriate means
to ensure the widest publicity,
including the use of broadcast notice to
mariners, Notices of implementation,
and press releases.
(d) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule are subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and
50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: April 16, 2013.
C.W. Ray,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fourteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–11233 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–6031,
hatten.charles@epa.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0406; EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0083; FRL–9811–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Dioxide
Ambient Air Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a request submitted by the Indiana
Department of Environmental
Management on April 15, 2011, and
supplemented on January 30, 2013, to
revise the Indiana state implementation
plan (SIP) for nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
and sulfur dioxide (SO2) under the
Clean Air Act. This submittal consists of
revisions to the Indiana Administrative
Code that amend the national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS) for NO2
and SO2 to be consistent with the
NAAQS that EPA promulgated in 2010.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2010–0083, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section (AR–
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 May 13, 2013
are only accepted during the Regional
Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Final Rules section of
this Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
Jkt 229001
In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If we do not receive any adverse
comments in response to this rule, we
do not contemplate taking any further
action. If EPA receives adverse
comments, we will withdraw the direct
final rule, and will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule, which is
located in the Final Rules section of this
Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 29, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013–11305 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28173
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 612
RIN 3145–AA56
Availability of Records and Information
National Science Foundation.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document sets forth
proposed revisions of the Foundation’s
regulations under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). The revisions
implement the provision of the Open
FOIA Act of 2009 which amended
Exemption 3, update procedural
provisions, and allow for multi-track
processing of requests.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
June 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this rule to the Office of the
General Counsel, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You
may also send comments by facsimile
transmission to (703) 292–9041, or send
them electronically through the Federal
Government’s one-stop rulemaking Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Matthew Powell, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,
National Science Foundation, telephone
703–292–8060 or email
mpowell@nsf.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Records and
Information (45 CFR Part 612) (FOTA
Regulations)
This revision of part 612 implements
the provision of the Open FOIA Act of
2009 which amends Exemption 3. It also
updates and clarifies several procedural
provisions concerning FOIA
administration, reflects changes in case
law, and includes revised current cost
figures for calculating and charging fees.
The duplication fee would be reduced.
In addition, the Foundation proposes to
implement multi-track processing.
Clarifications and procedural changes
are found at § 612.1(b) (General
Provisions); § 612.3(b) and (f)
(Requirements for making requests);
§ 612.5(a), (b), (c) and (d)(3) (Timing of
responses to requests); § 612.6(a)
(Responses to requests); § 612.7(a)(2), (3)
and (5)(iii) (Exemptions); and
§ 612.10(b)(3), and (c)(1) and (2) (Fees).
For purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601), the
revised rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities; the rule addresses the
procedures to be followed when
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28170-28173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0080]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Southern Oahu Tsunami Vessel
Evacuation; Honolulu, HI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a permanent regulated navigation area
(RNA), enforcement of which would take place only during times when a
tsunami warning is issued for the Hawaiian Islands by the Pacific
Tsunami Warning Center. Tsunami warnings require the evacuation of a
large number of vessels from their respective harbors. Following the
evacuation, these vessels must remain offshore until the emergency
situation has passed and the harbors have been deemed safe for re-
entry. Past tsunami warnings have created potentially dangerous
offshore traffic congestion between commercial and recreational vessel
traffic. Because of this, designated vessel traffic staging areas are
necessary for a safe and orderly evacuation of Southern Oahu ports.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0080 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Scott Whaley of the United States
Coast Guard Sector Honolulu at 808-522-8264 ext.352 or
Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil, respectively. If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to respond to this notice by submitting comments
and related materials. All comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal
information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission. To submit your
comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number USCG-2012-0080 in the ``SEARCH'' box, and then click ``SEARCH.''
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2012-0080 in the ``SEARCH'' box, and then click
``SEARCH.'' You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We
have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the
Docket Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain in detail why you believe a public meeting
would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid in solving this
problem, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The statutory basis for this rulemaking is 33 U.S.C. 1231, which
gives the Coast Guard, under a delegation from the Secretary of
Homeland Security, regulatory authority to enforce the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act. A regulated navigation area is a water area
within a defined boundary for which regulations for
[[Page 28171]]
vessels navigating within the area have been established to mitigate
hazardous conditions deemed to exist in that area. The purpose of this
rulemaking is to provide greater safety for vessels and maritime
commerce in the event of a tsunami threat.
Earthquakes off Chile and Japan in February 2010 and March 2011,
respectively, resulted in tsunami threats to the Main Hawaiian Islands.
These incidents emphasized the need to establish heightened safety
measures, to ensure an orderly and organized evacuation plan, in order
to protect the infrastructure of the southern coast of Oahu, Hawaii,
including Honolulu Harbor. Honolulu Harbor has only one entrance for
large commercial vessels and is the principle harbor of Hawaii's hub
and spoke maritime commerce system. If, during an emergency, a marine
incident were to occur off the southern shore of Oahu, especially near
the entrance of Honolulu Harbor, the results could be devastating to
Hawaii's economy and the maritime commerce system and the
constituencies that rely heavily upon the system's viability.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
In response to this risk, the Coast Guard proposes to establish a
regulated navigation area designated as the Southern Oahu Tsunami
Evacuation zone.
The Coast Guard has collaborated with the Hawaii Ocean Safety Team,
the Industry Advisory Board, and other industry partners in the
development of this rule. All recommendations have received careful
consideration during the drafting of this rule. This rule accurately
reflects the best practices as recommended by Hawaii's professional
mariners.
In the event of a tsunami warning, the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port for Honolulu (COTP) would notify the public that an enforcement
period is in effect for the duration of the emergency for this RNA. At
the conclusion of the treat, the COTP would notify the public when the
RNA enforcement period is suspended or terminated.
During the enforcement period, the COTP would deploy Coast Guard
assets to ensure participating commercial and recreational vessels move
to and stay within separate staging areas, and seaward of the 50 fathom
curve that covers near-shore waters less than 300 feet deep. Coast
Guard plans, which could vary depending on specific conditions during
an actual emergency, call for those staging areas to be separated by an
exclusionary area. This exclusionary area would measure 3.7 nautical
miles long by one (1) nautical mile wide, centering lengthwise and
along a line running seaward at 208 degrees southwest of the Honolulu
Harbor Range light. Commercial vessels would have to stay west of the
exclusionary area, and recreational vessels would have to stay east of
the exclusionary area.
A graphic of the regulated navigation area is in the docket (see
the ``Viewing comments and documents'' section of this NPRM). It shows
how we expect to separate commercial and recreational vessels when we
would enforce the RNA, but under actual enforcement conditions local
commanders could make alternate arrangements as those conditions
warrant.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
because it would have an effect on the regulated public only in the
rare circumstances of a tsunami threat, while at other times vessels
will be able to transit the area freely. Therefore, it does not require
an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
2. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities because it would have an effect on the regulated public
only in the rare circumstances of a tsunami threat, while at other
times vessels will be able to transit the area freely.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it. Before the
effective period, we will issue maritime advisories widely available to
the Oahu maritime, commercial, and tourist communities.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Lieutenant Commander Scott
Whaley, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Honolulu, at 808-522-8264 ext. 352, or at Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil via
email. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the
[[Page 28172]]
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Heath Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. An action is a ``significant energy action''
under E.O. 13211 if the action is (1) an agency action, (2) which is or
will lead to a final rule, and is either (3a) a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 AND is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy OR (3b) has been designated a ``significant energy action by the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. We
have determined that it is not a ``significant energy action'' under
that order because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Further, the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated this as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does
not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in
their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph (34)(g) of Figure 2-1 of
the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1413 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1413 Regulated navigation area; Southern Oahu Tsunami
Evacuation; Honolulu, Hawaii.
(a) Location. The following area is a regulated navigation area
(RNA): All waters contained within an area composing of an area on the
southern side of Oahu, HI. The RNA extends from the surface of the
water to the ocean floor and is bound by the following points:
21[deg]17'14'' N, 157[deg]55'34'' W, 21[deg]13'30'' N, 157[deg]55'34''
W; 21[deg]13'30'' N, 157[deg]48'20'' W; 21[deg]15'10'' N,
157[deg]48'20'' W thence westward along the 50 fathom curve to the
beginning point. These coordinates are based upon the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration Coast Survey, Pacific Ocean, Oahu,
Hawaii, chart 19357.
(b) Regulations. You may contact the Coast Guard on VHF Channel 16
(156.800 MHz) or at telephone number 808-842-2600, to obtain
clarification on RNA transits and locations. Coast Guard patrol boats
will be enforcing the RNA and providing on-scene direction. During the
enforcement period persons and vessels wishing to remain inside the RNA
must abide by the following stipulations:
(1) No person or vessel may enter into an exclusionary area 3.7
nautical miles long by one (1) nautical miles wide, centered lengthwise
and along a line running seaward at 208 degrees southwest of Honolulu
Harbor Front Range Light, except to transit to or from the staging
areas or other areas outside the zone. Loitering or lingering in the
exclusionary zone is prohibited.
(2) All recreational vessels wishing to remain in the RNA must
transit to and stage east of the exclusionary area, while all
commercial vessels wishing to remain in the RNA must transit to and
stage west of the exclusionary area.
(3) All vessels staging in the RNA must be seaward of the 50 fathom
(300 foot) curve.
(c) Enforcement period. Paragraph (b) of this section will be
enforced only when a tsunami warning has been issued for the Hawaiian
Islands by the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center. The COTP will notify the
public of any enforcement, suspension of enforcement, or termination of
[[Page 28173]]
enforcement through appropriate means to ensure the widest publicity,
including the use of broadcast notice to mariners, Notices of
implementation, and press releases.
(d) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: April 16, 2013.
C.W. Ray,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fourteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2013-11233 Filed 5-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P