VA Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) Verification Guidelines, 27882-27883 [2013-11326]
Download as PDF
27882
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Brenda Dann-Messier, Assistant
Secretary for Vocational and Adult
Education, to perform the functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Postsecondary Education.
Dated: May 8, 2013.
Brenda Dann-Messier,
Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult
Education, delegated the authority to perform
the functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2013–11287 Filed 5–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
I. Background
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 74
RIN 2900–AO63
VA Veteran-Owned Small Business
(VOSB) Verification Guidelines
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU) is currently reviewing its
regulations governing the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran-Owned
Small Business (VOSB) Verification
Program. OSDBU intends to improve the
regulations to provide greater clarity, to
streamline the program, and to
encourage more VOSBs to apply for
verification. By issuing this notice of
proposed rulemaking, OSDBU seeks
comments on how best to approach this
undertaking. Although OSDBU
identified specific issues for discussion
below, it encourages commenters to
discuss any issue related to improving
these specific regulations and the
program.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulation Policy
and Management (02REG), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AO63—VA Veteran-Owned Small
Business (VOSB) Verification
Guidelines.’’ Copies of comments
received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1068,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 May 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Leney, Executive Director, Center for
Veterans Enterprise (00VE), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.
NW., Washington DC 20420, (202) 461–
4300. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. The Verification Regulations
VA first published its regulations
governing the VA VOSB Verification
Program on February 8, 2010 (75 FR
6101), and most recently amended them
on January 19, 2011 (76 FR 3022). The
regulations are codified at 38 CFR part
74. These regulations were developed
using the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) regulations
governing the Government-wide
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small
Business (SDVOSB) program (13 CFR
part 125) and the 8(a) Business
Development Program (13 CFR part 124)
for guidance generally with respect to
Federal small business set-aside
programs that involve agency
verification. VA’s regulations lay out the
criteria for determining a firm’s
eligibility to participate in VA’s
Veterans First Contracting Program that
provides set-aside and sole source
authority placing SDVOSBs and VOSBs
as first and second priority in VA
acquisitions from commercial sources
under the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR). VA’s Veterans First
Contracting Program does not apply to
other Federal agencies.
B. Evaluation of Verification
Regulations and Justification for the
Rulemaking
VA seeks to find an appropriate
balance between preventing fraud in the
Veterans First Contracting Program and
providing a process that would make it
easier for more VOSBs to become
verified. The Verification Program has
been the subject of reports from both the
Government Accountability Office and
VA’s Office of Inspector General stating
that despite VA’s Verification Program,
fraud still exists in the Veterans First
Contracting Program. Some stakeholder
feedback has been that the current
regulations at 38 CFR part 74 are too
open to interpretation and are
unnecessarily more rigorous than
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
similar certification programs run by
SBA.
In addition to regulatory
improvements, VA is also committed to
making the verification process more
efficient and less burdensome and
creating greater clarity by providing
improved training tools. The
Verification Assistance Program
currently consists of four parts aimed at
helping veterans understand the
regulation and how to bring their
businesses into compliance in order to
be eligible for Veterans First contracting
opportunities. These include
Verification Assistance Briefs that
address the most common causes of
eligibility denial and where the issues
are found; a Verification SelfAssessment Tool that walks the veteran
through the regulation and how it
applies to the required documentation;
Verification Assistance Partners
consisting of veterans service
organizations and other non-profit
organizations to provide individual
counseling services to veterans; and the
Pre-Application Workshop that outlines
what a veteran needs to know and do to
put together a successful verification
application.
II. Questions for Comment
VA is considering ways to improve
the VA VOSB Verification Guidelines.
VA has already collected suggestions
from a wide range of sources for changes
to the regulations, and has compiled
them into a single document. This
compilation document and the existing
regulations can both be found at https://
www.vetbiz.gov.
VA invites comments on the ideas
offered in this compilation document as
well as the following questions:
1. What could be changed to improve
the clarity of the regulations? Where
might bright lines be drawn to more
clearly indicate compliance with the
regulations and reduce potential for
misinterpretation? Where might the
addition of bright line tests create
unintended consequences?
2. It has been suggested that VA
should develop a list that would clearly
delineate what constitutes ownership
and control and what constitutes lack of
control or ownership. Should a list like
this be included in the rule, and if so,
what should be on the list?
3. Are there changes to VA’s
regulations that could be made to
reduce the economic impact on VOSBs?
4. Are there changes to VA Form 0877
(application) that could streamline the
process?
5. What verification process
improvements could help to increase
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
efficiency and reduce burden for
VOSBs?
6. What additional training tools or
assistance might be offered to create
more clarity for stakeholders and help
them more efficiently and effectively
navigate the verification regulations?
7. What documents, records, or other
materials could the Office for the Center
for Veterans Enterprise use to
distinguish legitimate VOSBs/SDVOSBs
from businesses that fraudulently seek
contracts from the Government?
8. Would a special Hotline to report
suspected ineligible VOSBs/SDVOSBs
help the Government ensure that
contracts are awarded to legitimate
VOSBs/SDVOSBs?
Approved: May 7, 2013.
Jose D. Riojas,
Interim Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013–11326 Filed 5–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0347; FRL–9813–3]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; State of
Montana; Interstate Transport of
Pollution for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to partially
approve and partially disapprove
portions of a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submission from the State of
Montana that are intended to
demonstrate that its SIP meets certain
interstate transport requirements of the
Clean Air Act (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘CAA’’) for the
2006 fine particulate matter (‘‘PM2.5’’)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(‘‘NAAQS’’). This submission addresses
the requirement that Montana’s SIP
contain adequate provisions to prohibit
air emissions from adversely affecting
another state’s air quality through
interstate transport. Specifically, EPA is
proposing to partially approve and
partially disapprove the portion of the
Montana SIP submission that addresses
the CAA requirement prohibiting
emissions from Montana sources from
significantly contributing to
nonattainment of the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS in any other state or interfering
with maintenance of the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS by any other state. EPA is also
proposing to partially approve and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 May 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
partially disapprove the portion of
Montana’s submission that addresses
the CAA requirement that SIPs contain
provisions to insure compliance with
specific other CAA requirements
relating to interstate and international
pollution abatement. The partial
disapprovals, if finalized, would not
trigger an obligation for EPA to
promulgate a Federal Implementation
Plan (FIP) to address these interstate
transport requirements as EPA is
determining that the existing SIP is
adequate to meet the specific CAA
requirements.
Comments must be received on
or before June 12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2012–0347, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: clark.adam@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director,
Air Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. Such deliveries are only
accepted Monday through Friday, 8:00
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2012–
0347. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27883
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I.
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Clark, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202–
1129, (303) 312–7104,
clark.adam@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean
or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The initials CAIR mean or refer to the
Clean Air Interstate Rule
(iii) The initials CSAPR mean or refer to
the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
(iv) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or
refer to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27882-27883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11326]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 74
RIN 2900-AO63
VA Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) Verification Guidelines
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU) is currently reviewing its regulations governing the Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB)
Verification Program. OSDBU intends to improve the regulations to
provide greater clarity, to streamline the program, and to encourage
more VOSBs to apply for verification. By issuing this notice of
proposed rulemaking, OSDBU seeks comments on how best to approach this
undertaking. Although OSDBU identified specific issues for discussion
below, it encourages commenters to discuss any issue related to
improving these specific regulations and the program.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave. NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202)
273-9026. (This is not a toll-free number.) Comments should indicate
that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AO63--VA Veteran-
Owned Small Business (VOSB) Verification Guidelines.'' Copies of
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office
of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1068, between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays).
Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the comment period, comments may be viewed
online through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at
www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Leney, Executive Director, Center
for Veterans Enterprise (00VE), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave. NW., Washington DC 20420, (202) 461-4300. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. The Verification Regulations
VA first published its regulations governing the VA VOSB
Verification Program on February 8, 2010 (75 FR 6101), and most
recently amended them on January 19, 2011 (76 FR 3022). The regulations
are codified at 38 CFR part 74. These regulations were developed using
the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations governing the
Government-wide Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)
program (13 CFR part 125) and the 8(a) Business Development Program (13
CFR part 124) for guidance generally with respect to Federal small
business set-aside programs that involve agency verification. VA's
regulations lay out the criteria for determining a firm's eligibility
to participate in VA's Veterans First Contracting Program that provides
set-aside and sole source authority placing SDVOSBs and VOSBs as first
and second priority in VA acquisitions from commercial sources under
the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). VA's Veterans First
Contracting Program does not apply to other Federal agencies.
B. Evaluation of Verification Regulations and Justification for the
Rulemaking
VA seeks to find an appropriate balance between preventing fraud in
the Veterans First Contracting Program and providing a process that
would make it easier for more VOSBs to become verified. The
Verification Program has been the subject of reports from both the
Government Accountability Office and VA's Office of Inspector General
stating that despite VA's Verification Program, fraud still exists in
the Veterans First Contracting Program. Some stakeholder feedback has
been that the current regulations at 38 CFR part 74 are too open to
interpretation and are unnecessarily more rigorous than similar
certification programs run by SBA.
In addition to regulatory improvements, VA is also committed to
making the verification process more efficient and less burdensome and
creating greater clarity by providing improved training tools. The
Verification Assistance Program currently consists of four parts aimed
at helping veterans understand the regulation and how to bring their
businesses into compliance in order to be eligible for Veterans First
contracting opportunities. These include Verification Assistance Briefs
that address the most common causes of eligibility denial and where the
issues are found; a Verification Self-Assessment Tool that walks the
veteran through the regulation and how it applies to the required
documentation; Verification Assistance Partners consisting of veterans
service organizations and other non-profit organizations to provide
individual counseling services to veterans; and the Pre-Application
Workshop that outlines what a veteran needs to know and do to put
together a successful verification application.
II. Questions for Comment
VA is considering ways to improve the VA VOSB Verification
Guidelines. VA has already collected suggestions from a wide range of
sources for changes to the regulations, and has compiled them into a
single document. This compilation document and the existing regulations
can both be found at https://www.vetbiz.gov.
VA invites comments on the ideas offered in this compilation
document as well as the following questions:
1. What could be changed to improve the clarity of the regulations?
Where might bright lines be drawn to more clearly indicate compliance
with the regulations and reduce potential for misinterpretation? Where
might the addition of bright line tests create unintended consequences?
2. It has been suggested that VA should develop a list that would
clearly delineate what constitutes ownership and control and what
constitutes lack of control or ownership. Should a list like this be
included in the rule, and if so, what should be on the list?
3. Are there changes to VA's regulations that could be made to
reduce the economic impact on VOSBs?
4. Are there changes to VA Form 0877 (application) that could
streamline the process?
5. What verification process improvements could help to increase
[[Page 27883]]
efficiency and reduce burden for VOSBs?
6. What additional training tools or assistance might be offered to
create more clarity for stakeholders and help them more efficiently and
effectively navigate the verification regulations?
7. What documents, records, or other materials could the Office for
the Center for Veterans Enterprise use to distinguish legitimate VOSBs/
SDVOSBs from businesses that fraudulently seek contracts from the
Government?
8. Would a special Hotline to report suspected ineligible VOSBs/
SDVOSBs help the Government ensure that contracts are awarded to
legitimate VOSBs/SDVOSBs?
Approved: May 7, 2013.
Jose D. Riojas,
Interim Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013-11326 Filed 5-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P