Regulatory Flexibility Act Review, 27169-27171 [2013-10897]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 90 / Thursday, May 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules OAR–2009–0340, by any of the following methods: • www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Email: R10Public_Comments@epa.gov • Mail: Mr. Keith Rose, U.S. EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, AWT–107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle WA, 98101 • Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle WA, 98101. Attention: Keith Rose, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, AWT–107. Such deliveries are only accepted during normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to submit comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Rose at telephone number: (206) 553–1949, email address: rose.keith@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 address. For further information, please see the direct final action, of the same title, which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. The EPA is approving the State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the EPA views this as a noncontroversial SIP revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the preamble to the direct final rule. If the EPA receives no adverse comments, the EPA will not take further action on this proposed rule. If the EPA receives adverse comments, the EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:30 May 08, 2013 Jkt 229001 Dated: March 12, 2013. Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator, Region 10. [FR Doc. 2013–10938 Filed 5–8–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 49 CFR Chapter I [Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0027; Notice No. 13–5] Regulatory Flexibility Act Review Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; request for comments. AGENCY: PHMSA seeks comments on the economic impacts of its Hazardous Materials Regulations on small entities. In accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and as published in the Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan, PHMSA is reviewing and analyzing the regulations applicable to the Hazardous Materials Program Procedures to identify requirements which may have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Unified Agenda and Regulatory plan for the Department of Transportation can be found at the following URL: https://www.gpo.gov/ fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-01-15/pdf/201300597.pdf. DATES: Comments must be received by July 8, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Supko, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Standards and Rulemaking Division (202) 366–8553, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. For more information on the Hazardous Materials Regulations contact the Hazardous Materials Information Center at 1–800–467–4922 (in Washington, DC call 202–366–4488). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The complete analysis of the rules in the 2012–2013 Review Year, the Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan, and comment submission can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/ (Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0027). SUMMARY: I. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act A. Background and Purpose Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires periodic reviews PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 27169 of existing regulations with significant economic impact (5 U.S.C. 610(c)). The purpose of the 610 reviews is to assess the following: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received concerning the rule from the public; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates or conflicts with other Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. B. Review Schedule The Department of Transportation (DOT) published its Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan on December 21, 2012 listing in Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements (78 FR 3299) those regulations that each operating administration will review under section 610 during the next 12 months. Appendix D also contains DOT’s 10-year review plan for all its existing regulations. PHMSA has divided its Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 100–185) into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will be reviewed once every 10 years. Each group of regulations is reviewed in a two-stage process: (1) Analysis Year; and (2) Section 610 Review Year. In the Analysis Year, PHMSA conducts a review of the group regulations to determine whether any rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities; and thus requires review in accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each Regulatory Agenda, PHMSA publishes the results of the analyses completed for the previous year. For those rules that may have negative findings, a brief rationale is provided. For parts, subparts or sections of the HMR that do have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities, PHMSA will announce that it will be conducting a formal section 610 review during the following year. For the purposes of this review, the 2012– 2013 610 review year began in the Fall of 2012 and PHMSA’s analysis will conclude in the Fall of 2013. The following table shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule: E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1 27170 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 90 / Thursday, May 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules PHMSA SECTION 610 REVIEW PLAN 2008–2018 Title Year Specifications for Non-bulk Packagings .................... Specifications for Bulk Packagings ............................ Hazardous Materials Table, Special Provisions, Hazardous Materials Communications, Emergency Response Information, Training Requirements, and Security Plans; and Carriage by aircraft. Incident Reporting ...................................................... Hazardous Materials Program Procedures; General Information, Regulations and Definitions; Pipeline Safety Programs and Rulemaking Procedures; and Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline. Carriage by Rail; Carriage by Highway; Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline; Annual Reports, Incident Reports, and Safety-Related Conditions Reports. Carriage by Vessel; and Drug and Alcohol Testing .. C. 2012–2013 610 Review Year: Sections Under Review During Year 5 (2012–2013), PHMSA has initiated and will continue to conduct a formal section 610 review of Analysis year Regulations to be reviewed Review year 1 2 3 part 178 ..................................................................... parts 178 through 180 .............................................. parts 172 and 175 ..................................................... 2008 2009 2010 2009 2010 2011 4 5 sections 171.15 and 171.16 ..................................... parts 106, 107, 171, 190, and 195 ........................... 2011 2012 2012 2013 6 parts 174, 177, 191, and 192 ................................... 2013 2014 parts parts parts parts 2014 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2018 7 8 9 10 176 and 199 ..................................................... 172 through 178 .............................................. 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, and 193 ................... 173 and 194 ..................................................... some of 49 CFR parts 106, 107, 171. The full analysis document for the hazardous materials rules covered by Year 5 is available in the public docket for this notice (Go to www.regulations.gov—Search for Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0027). The section 610 analysis that began in the fall of 2012 included 49 CFR parts 106, 107, 171. Specific areas outlined in the full analysis for further review include: PART 107 Subpart Title Subpart D .................................................................................................................. Subpart D of part 107 contains the regulations pertaining to the enforcement authorities of the Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety and the Office of Chief Counsel. It outlines the minimum, maximum, and recommended baseline penalties for violating the HMR and the procedures for enforcing and imposing those sanctions. While no additional costs or impacts are imposed on small entities who comply with the HMR, PHMSA seeks comment on these regulations due to the potential for explicit monetary expenses (e.g. civil penalties and ticketing). Subpart F .................................................................................................................. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Subpart F of part 107 contains the registration procedures for manufacturers, assemblers, repairers, inspectors, testers and design certifying engineers of cargo tanks manufactured in accordance with a DOT specification or DOT special permit. In the last regulatory evaluation conducted in 2003, it was determined that approximately 9,200 motor carriers and 7,000 cargo tank inspection/testing facilities are small entities affected by the costs associated with these procedures. PHMSA is seeking comment on whether these regulations have a significant impact on small entities. Subpart I .................................................................................................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:30 May 08, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Enforcement. Registration of Cargo Tank and Cargo Tank Motor Vehicle Manufacturers, Assemblers, Repairers, Inspectors, Testers, and Design Certifying Engineers. Approval of Independent Inspection Agencies, Cylinder Requalifiers, and Non-domestic Chemical Analyses and Tests of DOT Specification Cylinders. E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 90 / Thursday, May 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules 27171 PART 107—Continued Subpart Title tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Subpart I of part 107 prescribes the approval process for persons who seek to be an independent inspection agency to perform tests, inspections, verifications and certifications of DOT specification cylinders or UN pressure receptacles. Additionally, this subpart addresses the approval process for a person who engages in the requalification (e.g. inspection, testing, or certification), rebuilding, or repair of a cylinder manufactured in accordance with a DOT specification or a pressure receptacle in accordance with a UN standard, or under the terms of a DOT special permit. This approval is commonly known as a requalifier identification number (RIN). Lastly, subpart I of part 107 addresses the approval procedures for persons who perform the manufacturing chemical analyses and tests of DOT specification cylinders, special permit cylinders, or UN pressure receptacles outside the United States. In the regulatory analysis of previous rulemakings affecting subpart I of part 107, it was determined that the vast majority of entities subject to those rulemakings were small entities. Thus, due to the number of small entities this subpart is estimated to affect, PHMSA is seeking comment on whether these regulations have a significant impact. As discussed in the Background and Purpose section above, Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires periodic reviews of existing regulations with significant economic impact (5 U.S.C. 610(c)). In conducting this review, PHMSA is seeking specific comments on whether the Hazardous Materials Program Procedures in 49 CFR part 107, Subparts D, F and I have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. ‘‘Small entities’’ include small businesses, notfor-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations under 50,000. If your business or organization is a small entity, or you represent a business or organization that is a small entity and the rules in 49 CFR part 107, Subparts D, F, and I or 49 CFR parts 106, 107, 171have a significant economic impact on your business or organization, please submit a comment at: https:// www.regulations.gov/ (Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0027) explaining the following: 1. How and to what degree these rules affect you; 2. Any complaints or comments you may have concerning the covered rules; 3. The complexity of the covered rules; 4. The extent to which the rules overlap, duplicate or conflict with other Federal rules, and to the extent feasible, with State and local government rules; and 5. The extent of the economic impact on you and why you believe the economic impact is significant. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:30 May 08, 2013 Jkt 229001 Issued in Washington, DC, on April 30, 2013 under authority delegated in 49 CFR part 106. Magdy El-Sibaie, Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–10897 Filed 5–8–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–60–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2012–0031; FWS– R4–ES–2013–0007; 4500030113] RIN 1018–AX73; 1018–AZ30 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Endangered Status for the Neosho Mucket, Threatened Status for the Rabbitsfoot, and Designation of Critical Habitat for Both Species Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period. AGENCY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the reopening of the public comment period on our October 16, 2012, proposed listing and designation of critical habitat for the Neosho mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) and rabbitsfoot (Quadrula cylindrica cylindrica) mussels under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We also announce the availability of a draft economic analysis (DEA) and draft environmental assessment of the proposed designation of critical habitat and an amended required determinations section of the proposal. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 We are reopening the comment period to allow all interested parties an opportunity to comment simultaneously on the revised proposed rule, the associated DEA and draft environmental assessment, and the amended required determinations section. Comments previously submitted need not be resubmitted, as they will be fully considered in preparation of the final rules. We will consider all comments received or postmarked on or before June 10, 2013. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. ADDRESSES: Document availability: You may obtain a copy of the proposed rule on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2012–0031 or by mail from the Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). You may obtain a copy of the draft economic analysis and the draft environmental assessment at Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0007. Written comments: You may submit written comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit comments on the listing proposal to Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2012–0031, and submit comments on the critical habitat proposal and associated draft economic analysis and draft environmental assessment to Docket No. FWS–R4–ES– 2013–0007. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for an explanation of the two dockets. (2) By hard copy: Submit comments on the listing proposal by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments DATES: E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 90 (Thursday, May 9, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27169-27171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10897]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

49 CFR Chapter I

[Docket No. PHMSA-2013-0027; Notice No. 13-5]


Regulatory Flexibility Act Review

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA seeks comments on the economic impacts of its Hazardous 
Materials Regulations on small entities. In accordance with section 610 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and as published in the Unified 
Agenda and Regulatory Plan, PHMSA is reviewing and analyzing the 
regulations applicable to the Hazardous Materials Program Procedures to 
identify requirements which may have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The Unified Agenda and Regulatory 
plan for the Department of Transportation can be found at the following 
URL: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-01-15/pdf/2013-00597.pdf.

DATES: Comments must be received by July 8, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Supko, Office of Hazardous 
Materials Safety, Standards and Rulemaking Division (202) 366-8553, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. For more information 
on the Hazardous Materials Regulations contact the Hazardous Materials 
Information Center at 1-800-467-4922 (in Washington, DC call 202-366-
4488).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The complete analysis of the rules in the 
2012-2013 Review Year, the Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan, and 
comment submission can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/ (Docket 
No. PHMSA-2013-0027).

I. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act

A. Background and Purpose

    Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires periodic 
reviews of existing regulations with significant economic impact (5 
U.S.C. 610(c)). The purpose of the 610 reviews is to assess the 
following: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of 
complaints or comments received concerning the rule from the public; 
(3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule 
overlaps, duplicates or conflicts with other Federal rules, and, to the 
extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; and (5) the 
length of time since the rule has been evaluated or the degree to which 
technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the 
area affected by the rule.

B. Review Schedule

    The Department of Transportation (DOT) published its Unified Agenda 
and Regulatory Plan on December 21, 2012 listing in Appendix D--Review 
Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements (78 FR 3299) those 
regulations that each operating administration will review under 
section 610 during the next 12 months. Appendix D also contains DOT's 
10-year review plan for all its existing regulations.
    PHMSA has divided its Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR 
parts 100-185) into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will be 
reviewed once every 10 years. Each group of regulations is reviewed in 
a two-stage process: (1) Analysis Year; and (2) Section 610 Review 
Year. In the Analysis Year, PHMSA conducts a review of the group 
regulations to determine whether any rule has a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities; and thus requires review in 
accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each 
Regulatory Agenda, PHMSA publishes the results of the analyses 
completed for the previous year. For those rules that may have negative 
findings, a brief rationale is provided. For parts, subparts or 
sections of the HMR that do have a significant impact on a substantial 
number of small entities, PHMSA will announce that it will be 
conducting a formal section 610 review during the following year. For 
the purposes of this review, the 2012-2013 610 review year began in the 
Fall of 2012 and PHMSA's analysis will conclude in the Fall of 2013. 
The following table shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule:

[[Page 27170]]



                                     PHMSA Section 610 Review Plan 2008-2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                          Analysis
                    Title                       Year      Regulations to be reviewed        year     Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifications for Non-bulk Packagings.......       1  part 178.......................         2008         2009
Specifications for Bulk Packagings...........       2  parts 178 through 180..........         2009         2010
Hazardous Materials Table, Special                  3  parts 172 and 175..............         2010         2011
 Provisions, Hazardous Materials
 Communications, Emergency Response
 Information, Training Requirements, and
 Security Plans; and Carriage by aircraft.
Incident Reporting...........................       4  sections 171.15 and 171.16.....         2011         2012
Hazardous Materials Program Procedures;             5  parts 106, 107, 171, 190, and           2012         2013
 General Information, Regulations and                   195.
 Definitions; Pipeline Safety Programs and
 Rulemaking Procedures; and Transportation of
 Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline.
Carriage by Rail; Carriage by Highway;              6  parts 174, 177, 191, and 192...         2013         2014
 Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by
 Pipeline; Annual Reports, Incident Reports,
 and Safety-Related Conditions Reports.
Carriage by Vessel; and Drug and Alcohol            7  parts 176 and 199..............         2014         2015
 Testing.
                                                    8  parts 172 through 178..........         2015         2016
                                                    9  parts 172, 173, 174, 176, 177,          2016         2017
                                                        and 193.
                                                   10  parts 173 and 194..............         2017         2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. 2012-2013 610 Review Year: Sections Under Review

    During Year 5 (2012-2013), PHMSA has initiated and will continue to 
conduct a formal section 610 review of some of 49 CFR parts 106, 107, 
171. The full analysis document for the hazardous materials rules 
covered by Year 5 is available in the public docket for this notice (Go 
to www.regulations.gov--Search for Docket No. PHMSA-2013-0027). The 
section 610 analysis that began in the fall of 2012 included 49 CFR 
parts 106, 107, 171. Specific areas outlined in the full analysis for 
further review include:

                                PART 107
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Subpart                               Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart D.................................  Enforcement.
Subpart D of part 107 contains the
 regulations pertaining to the enforcement
 authorities of the Associate
 Administrator for Hazardous Materials
 Safety and the Office of Chief Counsel.
 It outlines the minimum, maximum, and
 recommended baseline penalties for
 violating the HMR and the procedures for
 enforcing and imposing those sanctions.
 While no additional costs or impacts are
 imposed on small entities who comply with
 the HMR, PHMSA seeks comment on these
 regulations due to the potential for
 explicit monetary expenses (e.g. civil
 penalties and ticketing).
Subpart F.................................  Registration of Cargo Tank
                                             and Cargo Tank Motor
                                             Vehicle Manufacturers,
                                             Assemblers, Repairers,
                                             Inspectors, Testers, and
                                             Design Certifying
                                             Engineers.
Subpart F of part 107 contains the
 registration procedures for
 manufacturers, assemblers, repairers,
 inspectors, testers and design certifying
 engineers of cargo tanks manufactured in
 accordance with a DOT specification or
 DOT special permit. In the last
 regulatory evaluation conducted in 2003,
 it was determined that approximately
 9,200 motor carriers and 7,000 cargo tank
 inspection/testing facilities are small
 entities affected by the costs associated
 with these procedures. PHMSA is seeking
 comment on whether these regulations have
 a significant impact on small entities.
Subpart I.................................  Approval of Independent
                                             Inspection Agencies,
                                             Cylinder Requalifiers, and
                                             Non-domestic Chemical
                                             Analyses and Tests of DOT
                                             Specification Cylinders.

[[Page 27171]]

 
Subpart I of part 107 prescribes the
 approval process for persons who seek to
 be an independent inspection agency to
 perform tests, inspections, verifications
 and certifications of DOT specification
 cylinders or UN pressure receptacles.
 Additionally, this subpart addresses the
 approval process for a person who engages
 in the requalification (e.g. inspection,
 testing, or certification), rebuilding,
 or repair of a cylinder manufactured in
 accordance with a DOT specification or a
 pressure receptacle in accordance with a
 UN standard, or under the terms of a DOT
 special permit. This approval is commonly
 known as a requalifier identification
 number (RIN). Lastly, subpart I of part
 107 addresses the approval procedures for
 persons who perform the manufacturing
 chemical analyses and tests of DOT
 specification cylinders, special permit
 cylinders, or UN pressure receptacles
 outside the United States. In the
 regulatory analysis of previous
 rulemakings affecting subpart I of part
 107, it was determined that the vast
 majority of entities subject to those
 rulemakings were small entities. Thus,
 due to the number of small entities this
 subpart is estimated to affect, PHMSA is
 seeking comment on whether these
 regulations have a significant impact.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the Background and Purpose section above, Section 
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires periodic reviews of 
existing regulations with significant economic impact (5 U.S.C. 
610(c)). In conducting this review, PHMSA is seeking specific comments 
on whether the Hazardous Materials Program Procedures in 49 CFR part 
107, Subparts D, F and I have a significant impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. ``Small entities'' include small businesses, 
not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated 
and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions 
with populations under 50,000.
    If your business or organization is a small entity, or you 
represent a business or organization that is a small entity and the 
rules in 49 CFR part 107, Subparts D, F, and I or 49 CFR parts 106, 
107, 171have a significant economic impact on your business or 
organization, please submit a comment at: https://www.regulations.gov/ 
(Docket No. PHMSA-2013-0027) explaining the following:
    1. How and to what degree these rules affect you;
    2. Any complaints or comments you may have concerning the covered 
rules;
    3. The complexity of the covered rules;
    4. The extent to which the rules overlap, duplicate or conflict 
with other Federal rules, and to the extent feasible, with State and 
local government rules; and
    5. The extent of the economic impact on you and why you believe the 
economic impact is significant.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 30, 2013 under authority 
delegated in 49 CFR part 106.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety Pipeline and 
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-10897 Filed 5-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P