Notice of Agreements Filed, 26779-26780 [2013-10926]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
exist for receivers, what is the
relationship between these standards
and the method for determining
appropriate harm claim thresholds for
receivers? How do actual receivers
perform in relation to existing
performance standards? How are
receivers evaluated in meeting those
industry standards? Where there are
industry standards, how are such
standards enforced? To the extent
standards are voluntary, how do users of
receivers know whether equipment
meets or exceeds such standards? Where
there are no industry standards for
receiver performance, how should
acceptable thresholds of receiver
performance be developed and
validated? What are the technical and
performance issues among diverse
wireless services that need to be
understood and analyzed between
different stakeholder groups, especially
the developers of wireless transmitters,
receivers and components? What are the
cost and performance trends of key
receiver components that determine
practical thresholds of system
performance?
9. The TAC recommends that the FCC
implement a Web accessible repository
(e.g., through the FCC spectrum
dashboard) of existing receiver
standards, and a voluntary repository of
receiver specifications for existing
receivers. This, the TAC contends,
would facilitate technical information
sharing among diverse stakeholder
groups of wireless system developers
who need to know and understand the
specifications of systems other than
their own. How effective would this
method of information sharing be for
product developers? What are the
source documents that would be
appropriate for such a repository? Are
there additional and/or more effective
methods, perhaps industry-led, to share
receiver technical standards and
specifications between stakeholder
groups that traditionally do not work
together in the same industry groups
(e.g., standards organizations)? Given
the increasing number of devices
developed for international use, would
an industry-led approach be more
effective than a US-specific repository?
Multi-Stakeholder Organizations
10. The TAC recommends that the
Commission encourage the formation of
one or more multi-stakeholder groups to
investigate interference limits policy at
suitable high-value inter-service
boundaries. We seek comment on such
a multi-stakeholder process and solicit
interest from candidate participants.
What frequency bands would be most
appropriate for considering the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:56 May 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
formation of a multi-stakeholder
organization to develop technical
parameters and methods for
implementing an interference limits
policy? Are there more effective
methods of organizing a diverse group
of stakeholders for developing such
technical parameters?
11. What is the best way to initiate the
formation of a multi-stakeholder group?
We invite comment and
recommendations on applicable
governance, issue resolution, and
enforcement methods, including but not
limited to how stakeholders can
coordinate across industry segments,
such as those where voluntary standards
are needed and/or developed. Also,
recognizing that service boundaries and
spectrum sharing often involve both
non-federal and federal spectrum users,
we seek comment on the costs and
benefits of a comprehensive approach
between the FCC and NTIA to
incorporate receiver performance into
spectrum management practices. How
should the FCC and NTIA coordinate
with government agencies and other
stakeholders to address situations where
large numbers of users are impacted by
changes to adjacent spectrum licenses?
Should the FCC and NTIA perform band
assessments to determine where
possible future repurposing in a band
might impact adjacent bands and
develop plans and processes to ensure
proper protections?
Role of the FCC
12. We seek general comment on
whether and how the Commission
should implement a policy that
incentivizes improved interference
tolerance of wireless systems.
Specifically, should the FCC adopt a
policy of employing interference limits
in certain cases of neighboring bands
and services? Should the FCC adopt
specific rules for establishing
interference limits that are
recommended by one or more multistakeholder groups? Should the FCC
develop a compliance model similar to
the one used in the context of CALEA,
in which there is industry-led
establishment of standards and
solutions and the Commission would
get involved only via special petition?
We envision that the FCC could be a
facilitator in a non-directive role with
convening stakeholders. Also, the GAO
recommends consideration of smallscale pilot tests of options for improving
receiver performance. What should be
the scope of an appropriate pilot test?
What role should the FCC play in
encouraging and initiating industry
action? Are there existing FCC
proceedings where incentives to
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26779
improve the interference tolerance of
wireless systems should be applied?
Federal Communications Commission.
Julius P. Knapp,
Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2013–10840 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days
of the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 011325–042.
Title: Westbound Transpacific
Stabilization Agreement.
Parties: American President Lines,
Ltd./APL Co. Pte Ltd. (withdrawal from
agreement effective September 1, 2012);
COSCO Container Lines Company
Limited; Evergreen Line Joint Service
Agreement; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.;
Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hyundai Merchant
Marine Co. Ltd.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha,
Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line; Orient
Overseas Container Line Limited; and
Yangming Marine Transport Corp.
Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 627 I Street NW.; Suite
1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: This amendment reflects
the suspension of the agreement,
effective May 1, 2013 through April 14,
2015.
Agreement No.: 011602–013.
Title: Grand Alliance Agreement II.
Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG; HapagLloyd USA LLC; Nippon Yusen Kaisha;
Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.;
Orient Overseas Container Line Limited;
and Orient Overseas Container Line
(Europe) Limited.
Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The amendment would
revise the agreement to reflect the fact
that the parties have agreed to charter
and rationalize vessel space among
themselves and with other VOCCs in the
trade pursuant to the parties’
participation in the G6 Alliance
Agreement.
Agreement No.: 012194–001.
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
26780
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Notices
Title: The G6 Alliance Agreement.
Parties: American President Lines,
Ltd. and APL Co. Pte, Ltd. (Operating as
one Party); Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hyundai
Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Mitsui
O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen
Kaisha; and Orient Overseas Container
Line, Limited and Orient Overseas
Container Line Inc. (Operating as one
party).
Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The amendment corrects
the name of Orient Overseas Container
Line Limited and Orient Overseas
Container Line Inc. (Operating as one
party).
Agreement No.: 012206.
Title: Industria Armamento
Meridionale S.P.A./K-Line Space
Charter Agreement.
Parties: Industria Armamento
Meridionale S.P.A. (‘‘Inarme’’) and
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
Filing Party: John P. Meade, Esq.;
General Counsel; K- Line America, Inc.;
6009 Bethlehem Road; Preston, MD
21655.
Synopsis: The agreement authorizes
Inarme to charter space on K-Line
vessels in the trade from the United
Kingdom to the U.S. East Coast.
Dated: May 3, 2013.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2013–10907 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies;
Correction
BILLING CODE P
17:56 May 07, 2013
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 3, 2013.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[FR Doc. 2013–10926 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than June 3, 2013.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King,
Community Affairs Officer) 90
Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55480–0291:
1. Lake Shore III Corporation,
Glenwood City, Wisconsin; to become a
bank holding company by acquiring 100
percent of Hiawatha National Bank,
Hager City, Wisconsin.
This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc.
78–FR 25084) published on pages
25084–25085 of the issue for Monday,
April 29, 2013.
Under the Federal Reserve Bank of
Kansas City heading, the entry for First
Central Nebraska Co, Broken Bow,
Nebraska is revised to read as follows:
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice
President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198–0001:
1. Gene R. Giles, Alliance, Nebraska,
Sally J. Giles, Denver, Colorado, Randall
D. Giles, San Diego, California, Nicholas
G. Giles, Lincoln, Nebraska, and Lucas
G. Giles, Lincoln, Nebraska, all of the
Giles family group; the Bradley S.
Norden Irrevocable Trust and the Brett
A. Norden Irrevocable Trust, Brett A.
Norden and Bradley S. Norden, as cotrustees of both trusts, all of Highlands
Ranch, Colorado, and as members of the
Norden family group; Cheryl L. Ryan,
the Michael L. Ryan 2011 Irrevocable
Trust and the Cheryl L. Ryan 2012
Irrevocable Trust, all of Minden,
Nebraska, Jeffrey M. Ryan, Heartwell,
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nebraska, and Jamie Johnson, Minden,
Nebraska, as co-trustees of both trusts;
and Walter D. Wood Revocable Trust,
Walter D. Wood, trustee, both of Omaha,
Nebraska, as part of the Ryan/Wood
family group; to acquire voting shares of
First Central Nebraska Co., and thereby
indirectly acquire voting shares of
Nebraska State Bank and Trust
Company, both in Broken Bow,
Nebraska.
Comments on this application must
be received by May 23, 2012.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 3, 2012.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2013–10922 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day-13–0041]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR) publishes a list of information
collection requests under review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–7570 or send an
email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to ATSDR Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202)
395–5806. Written comments should be
received within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
National Amyotrophic Lateral
Sclerosis (ALS) Registry—Revision
(0923–0041, Expiration 7/31/13)—
Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR).
Background and Brief Description
On October 10, 2008, President Bush
signed S. 1382: ALS Registry Act which
amended the Public Health Service Act
to provide for the establishment of an
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Registry. The activities described are
part of the effort to create the National
ALS Registry. The purpose of the
registry is to: (1) Better describe the
incidence and prevalence of ALS in the
United States; (2) examine appropriate
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26779-26780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10926]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 011325-042.
Title: Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement.
Parties: American President Lines, Ltd./APL Co. Pte Ltd.
(withdrawal from agreement effective September 1, 2012); COSCO
Container Lines Company Limited; Evergreen Line Joint Service
Agreement; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hyundai Merchant
Marine Co. Ltd.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line;
Orient Overseas Container Line Limited; and Yangming Marine Transport
Corp.
Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 627 I Street
NW.; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: This amendment reflects the suspension of the agreement,
effective May 1, 2013 through April 14, 2015.
Agreement No.: 011602-013.
Title: Grand Alliance Agreement II.
Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hapag-Lloyd USA LLC; Nippon Yusen Kaisha;
Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.; Orient Overseas Container Line
Limited; and Orient Overseas Container Line (Europe) Limited.
Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street
NW., Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The amendment would revise the agreement to reflect the
fact that the parties have agreed to charter and rationalize vessel
space among themselves and with other VOCCs in the trade pursuant to
the parties' participation in the G6 Alliance Agreement.
Agreement No.: 012194-001.
[[Page 26780]]
Title: The G6 Alliance Agreement.
Parties: American President Lines, Ltd. and APL Co. Pte, Ltd.
(Operating as one Party); Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co.,
Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; and Orient
Overseas Container Line, Limited and Orient Overseas Container Line
Inc. (Operating as one party).
Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street
NW., Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The amendment corrects the name of Orient Overseas
Container Line Limited and Orient Overseas Container Line Inc.
(Operating as one party).
Agreement No.: 012206.
Title: Industria Armamento Meridionale S.P.A./K-Line Space Charter
Agreement.
Parties: Industria Armamento Meridionale S.P.A. (``Inarme'') and
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
Filing Party: John P. Meade, Esq.; General Counsel; K- Line
America, Inc.; 6009 Bethlehem Road; Preston, MD 21655.
Synopsis: The agreement authorizes Inarme to charter space on K-
Line vessels in the trade from the United Kingdom to the U.S. East
Coast.
Dated: May 3, 2013.
By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-10926 Filed 5-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
