Notice of Open Public Hearing, 26697-26698 [2013-10701]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Notices
and Special Veterans Benefits, (60–
0103)
B. State agencies expected to
participate using non-federal systems of
records are:
1. Alabama Department of Human
Resources
2. Alabama Medicaid Agency
3. Alaska Department of Health & Social
Services
4. Arizona Department of Economic
Security
5. Arkansas Department of Human
Services
6. California Department of Social
Services
7. Colorado Department of Human
Services
8. Connecticut Department of Social
Services
9. Delaware Department of Health &
Social Services
10. D.C. Department of Human Services
11. Florida Department of Children &
Families
12. Georgia Department of Human
Resources
13. Hawaii Department of Human
Services
14. Idaho Department of Health/Welfare
15. Illinois Department of Human
Services
16. Indiana Family & Social Services
Administration
17. Iowa Department of Human Services
18. Kansas Department of Social/Rehab
Services
19. Kentucky Cabinet for Health and
Family Services
20. Louisiana Department of Health &
Hospitals
21. Louisiana Department of Children
and Family Services
22. Maine Department of Human
Services
23. Maryland Department of Human
Services
24. Massachusetts Department of
Transitional Assistance
25. Michigan Department of Human
Services
26. Minnesota Department of Human
Services
27. Mississippi Department of Human
Services
28. Mississippi Division of Medicaid
29. Missouri Department of Social
Services
30. Montana Department of Public
Health & Human Services
31. Nebraska Department of Health &
Human Services
32. Nevada Department of Health and
Human Services
33. New Hampshire Department of
Health & Human Services
34. New Jersey Department of Human
Services
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
35. New Mexico Human Services
Department
36. New York Office of Temporary &
Disability Assistance
37. North Carolina Department of Health
& Human Services
38. North Dakota Department of Human
Services
39. Ohio Department of Job and Family
Services
40. Oklahoma Department of Human
Services
41. Oregon Department of Human
Resources
42. Pennsylvania Department of Public
Welfare
43. Rhode Island Department of Human
Services
44. South Carolina Department of Social
Services
45. South Dakota Department of Social
Services
46. Tennessee Department of Human
Services
47. Texas Health and Human Services
Commission
48. Utah Department of Workforce
Services
49. Vermont Department for Children
and Families
50. Virginia Department of Social
Services
51. Washington Department of Social &
Health Services
52. West Virginia Department of Health
and Human Services
53. Wisconsin Department of Health
Services
54. Wyoming Department of Family
Services
Beginning and completion dates: The
matches are conducted on an ongoing
basis in accordance with the terms of
the computer matching agreement in
effect with each participant as approved
by the applicable Data Integrity
Board(s). The term of these agreements
is expected to cover the 18-month
period, July 1, 2013, through December
31, 2014. Ninety days prior to expiration
of the agreement, the parties to the
agreement may request a 12-month
extension in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552a(o).
Dated: May 1, 2013.
Veronica Marco,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy,
Transparency, and Records.
[FR Doc. 2013–10709 Filed 5–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND
SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION
Notice of Open Public Hearing
U.S.-China Economic and
Security Review Commission.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26697
Notice of open public hearing—
May 9, 2013, Washington, DC.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following hearing of the U.S.-China
Economic and Security Review
Commission.
Name: William A. Reinsch, Chairman
of the U.S.-China Economic and
Security Review Commission. The
Commission is mandated by Congress to
investigate, assess, and report to
Congress annually on ‘‘the national
security implications of the economic
relationship between the United States
and the People’s Republic of China.’’
Pursuant to this mandate, the
Commission will hold a public hearing
in Washington, DC on May 9, 2013,
‘‘Trends and Implications of Chinese
Investment in the United States.’’
Background: This is the fifth public
hearing the Commission will hold
during its 2013 report cycle to collect
input from academic, industry, and
government experts on national security
implications of the U.S. bilateral trade
and economic relationship with China.
This hearing will explore patterns of
Chinese investment in the U.S. and the
implications of that investment for U.S.
policymakers.
The hearing will be co-chaired by
Commissioners Carolyn Bartholomew
and Larry Wortzel. Any interested party
may file a written statement by May 9,
2013, by mailing to the contact below.
A portion of each panel will include a
question and answer period between the
Commissioners and the witnesses.
Location, Date and Time: Room H–
309 The U.S. Capitol. Thursday, May 9,
2013, 9:00 a.m.–12:30 p.m. Eastern
Time. A detailed agenda for the hearing
is posted to the Commission’s Web site
at www.uscc.gov. Also, please check our
Web site for possible changes to the
hearing schedule. Reservations are not
required to attend the hearing.
Any
member of the public seeking further
information concerning the hearing
should contact Reed Eckhold, 444 North
Capitol Street NW., Suite 602,
Washington DC 20001; phone: 202–624–
1496, or via email at reckhold@uscc.gov.
Reservations are not required to attend
the hearing.
Authority: Congress created the U.S.China Economic and Security Review
Commission in 2000 in the National
Defense Authorization Act (Pub. L. 106–
398), as amended by Division P of the
Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution, 2003 (Pub. L. 108–7), as
amended by Public Law 109–108
(November 22, 2005).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
26698
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Notices
Dated: April 30, 2013.
Michael Danis,
Executive Director, U.S.-China Economic and
Security Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–10701 Filed 5–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1137–00–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Report: Strategies for Serving Our
Women Veterans
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final notice.
AGENCY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On May 14, 2012, the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
published a notice in the Federal
Register inviting public comment on the
Draft Strategy Report (DSR) titled,
Strategies for Serving Our Women
Veterans. This document responds to
the public comments received and
affirms as final, with two identified
changes, to the DSR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Trowell-Harris, RN, Ed.D.,
Director, Center for Women Veterans,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20420.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice
published on May 14, 2012 [FR Vol. 77,
No. 93], VA presented its DSR,
Strategies for Serving Our Women
Veterans. VA is committed to
transformation, with the aim of
becoming an increasingly Veterancentric, results-driven, and forwardlooking organization. In line with this
commitment, Secretary Shinseki called
for the formation of a Women Veterans
Task Force (WVTF) in July 2011, to be
charged with developing a
comprehensive VA action plan for
resolving gaps in how our organization
serves women Veterans. As an interim
deliverable, WVTF developed this DSR
to solicit stakeholder feedback on its
initial findings and recommendations.
Following public comments to this
draft, WVTF will develop a detailed
operating plan for implementation.
We received 32 comments on the DSR
through the Federal Register. The
majority of comments involved one or
more of the following topics: Veterans
Benefits Administration (VBA)
disability ratings policies;
recommendations for collaboration
between Department of Defense (DoD)
and VA in outreach to women Veterans,
including outreach prior to separation
from service; need for DoD to enhance
its efforts in military sexual trauma
(MST) prevention; privacy in regard to
MST treatment and other issues related
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
to MST treatment, including
recommended change in questions
asked during National Security
Clearance process; need for full-time
women Veterans coordinators; need for
expanded child-care; need for specific
treatment for homeless women
Veterans; importance of culture change
across VA with regard to women
Veterans; disparities in care for women
Veterans; need for specific goals,
metrics, and accountability to ensure
successful implementation of the
recommendations in the draft report;
need for more research and data;
concerns about how the Task Force was
constituted; and opportunities for
collaboration with non-governmental
organizations (NGO) and other Federal
and state agencies.
Other comments related to gaps and
recommendations laid out in the
strategy report, editorial corrections,
and citations. One included a report of
alleged criminal activity (identity theft)
at a specific VA facility. Based on
subject matter, most of the comments
can be grouped into several categories:
VA claims and benefits; collaboration
for proactive outreach to women
Veterans; MST; access to VA services
(access to VA health care); homeless
women Veterans; culture change; data;
and WVTF integrity and accountability.
We have organized our discussion of the
comments accordingly.
Comments Concerning VA Claims and
Benefits
There were a number of comments
regarding VA’s disability ratings
policies and procedures and the length
of time it takes to decide a case. One
commenter expressed concern that her
claim was not properly rated because
she suffered from a difficult-to- diagnose
disease. Others expressed that VA’s
disability rating system is still largely
intact despite not having been updated
in 50 years, and that major renovations
are needed for today’s medical
evaluations. These comments are
beyond the scope of this particular
report. We, therefore, make no changes
to the DSR based on those comments.
The majority of commenters believed
that VA should more closely collaborate
with DoD in providing transition
services to women Veterans. One
commenter believed that DoD and VA
need to collaborate consistently and
more comprehensively to achieve
outreach and education goals as
described in the DSR.
Multiple commenters believed that
Servicemembers need to be provided
with information regarding VA services
and benefits for which they may be
entitled or eligible at the time of their
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discharge or release from active duty or
service. One commenter believed it
essential that VA fully recognizes and
reaches out to nonprofits that are
conducting important work in helping
women Veterans not only to secure
employment but also to have fulfilling
long-term careers in civilian life, and
the commenter recommended that VA
conduct an external mapping of the
services being provided by nonprofit
and community organizations for
women Veterans. Other comments
concerned opportunities for
collaboration with NGOs, local
community organizations, and other
Federal agencies to provide training,
services, outreach, research, and
opportunities for women Veterans.
These comments are outside the scope
of this strategy report; we, therefore, do
not make any changes to the DSR based
on those comments.
Military Sexual Trauma
One commenter expressed concern
regarding question #21 of the National
Security Clearance Questionnaire that
asks about mental health treatment. The
commenter suggested that treatment for
sexual assault counseling be excluded
from disclosure and that VA advocate
changing the question across the Federal
Government. No changes to the DSR are
made based on this comment, which is
beyond the scope of the report.
Many commenters recounted personal
experiences regarding sexual assault
and MST they experienced. They also
commented on DoD and VA’s processes
for treatment and benefits for those who
experienced MST, the lack of VBA
Women Veteran Coordinators’ contact
information at Veteran outreach events,
and a lack of interest—both in DoD and
VA—in minimizing the retraumatization of women Veterans
reporting or filing claims for MST.
These comments are beyond the scope
of this report. As such, we do not make
any changes to the DSR.
Access to VA
One commenter commended VA’s
efforts pertaining to delivery of services
and benefits to women Veterans through
the Center for Women Veterans, Women
Veterans Health Strategic Health Care
Group, Office of Mental Health Services,
and women Veterans coordinators. The
commenter expressed that proposed
efforts need to be monitored and tracked
in a comprehensive way to ensure that,
together, they are succeeding in meeting
the goals and outcomes set by VA. The
commenter further suggested that VA
ensure that there is no duplication of
effort and that all programs and offices
work together. The final suggestion of
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26697-26698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10701]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION
Notice of Open Public Hearing
AGENCY: U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
ACTION: Notice of open public hearing--May 9, 2013, Washington, DC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following hearing of the U.S.-
China Economic and Security Review Commission.
Name: William A. Reinsch, Chairman of the U.S.-China Economic and
Security Review Commission. The Commission is mandated by Congress to
investigate, assess, and report to Congress annually on ``the national
security implications of the economic relationship between the United
States and the People's Republic of China.'' Pursuant to this mandate,
the Commission will hold a public hearing in Washington, DC on May 9,
2013, ``Trends and Implications of Chinese Investment in the United
States.''
Background: This is the fifth public hearing the Commission will
hold during its 2013 report cycle to collect input from academic,
industry, and government experts on national security implications of
the U.S. bilateral trade and economic relationship with China. This
hearing will explore patterns of Chinese investment in the U.S. and the
implications of that investment for U.S. policymakers.
The hearing will be co-chaired by Commissioners Carolyn Bartholomew
and Larry Wortzel. Any interested party may file a written statement by
May 9, 2013, by mailing to the contact below. A portion of each panel
will include a question and answer period between the Commissioners and
the witnesses.
Location, Date and Time: Room H-309 The U.S. Capitol. Thursday, May
9, 2013, 9:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Eastern Time. A detailed agenda for the
hearing is posted to the Commission's Web site at www.uscc.gov. Also,
please check our Web site for possible changes to the hearing schedule.
Reservations are not required to attend the hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public seeking
further information concerning the hearing should contact Reed Eckhold,
444 North Capitol Street NW., Suite 602, Washington DC 20001; phone:
202-624-1496, or via email at reckhold@uscc.gov. Reservations are not
required to attend the hearing.
Authority: Congress created the U.S.-China Economic and Security
Review Commission in 2000 in the National Defense Authorization Act
(Pub. L. 106-398), as amended by Division P of the Consolidated
Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (Pub. L. 108-7), as amended by Public
Law 109-108 (November 22, 2005).
[[Page 26698]]
Dated: April 30, 2013.
Michael Danis,
Executive Director, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-10701 Filed 5-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1137-00-P