Federal Acquisition Regulation; Irrevocable Letters of Credit, 26573-26575 [2013-10211]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Proposed Rules
may file comments and reply comments
on or before the dates indicated on the
first page of this document. Comments
may be filed using the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS). See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number. Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed
of before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
This matter shall be treated as a
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules, 47 CFR 1.1200 through
1.1216. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with
§ 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
§ 1.49(f) or for which the Commission
has made available a method of
electronic filing, written ex parte
presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
William Dever,
Chief, Competition Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–10687 Filed 5–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 28, and 52
[FAR Case 2011–023; Docket 2011–0023;
Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM53
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Irrevocable Letters of Credit
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26573
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to remove
all references to Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP) Pamphlet
No. 7, Use of Irrevocable Letters of
Credit, and also provide updated
sources of data required to verify the
credit worthiness of a financial entity
issuing or confirming an irrevocable
letter of credit (ILC).
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addressees
shown below on or before July 8, 2013
to be considered in the formation of the
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR Case 2011–023 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘FAR Case 2011–023.’’
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2011–
023.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2011–
023’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2011–023, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cecelia Davis, Procurement Analyst, at
202–219–0202, for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501–
4755. Please cite FAR Case 2011–023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to amend the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to remove all
references to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7, Use
of Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and
provide updated sources of data
required to verify the credit worthiness
of a financial entity issuing or
confirming an ILC.
OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 provided
detailed guidance for implementing
policy letter 91–4, Use of Irrevocable
Letters of Credit (ILC), for Government
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
26574
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
contracts. A prior FAR final rule (FAR
Case 2000–605, Rescission of Office of
Federal Procurement Policy Letters, 65
FR 36014) removed the FAR references
to OFPP Policy Letter 91–4 along with
several other policy letters that were
rescinded by OFPP, effective March 30,
2000 (see 65 FR 16968). However, the
reference to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7
remained in FAR Part 28 because the
information was considered relevant
and provided, among other information,
a listing of available quantitative and
qualitative credit rating institutions and
resources, formats for ILCs, and other
useful data.
FAR 28.204–3 currently cites OFPP
Pamphlet No. 7 at subparagraphs (g)(1)
and (h)(1) as an available resource that
may be used to obtain information on
credit rating services or investment
grade ratings of financial entities issuing
or confirming ILCs because it provides
overarching policy and specific
guidance on the use of ILCs, but some
of the information is outdated.
Therefore, instead of referencing the
OFPP Pamphlet, this rule proposes to—
(1) Extract from the OFPP Pamphlet
the relevant and current information for
inclusion in the FAR; and
(2) Provide additional sources of data
required to verify the credit worthiness
of a financial entity issuing or
confirming an ILC, as summarized on
the Web sites of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (https://
www2.fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp) and
Securities and Exchange Commission
(https://www.sec.gov/answers/nsro.htm).
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September
30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect
this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the
rule only removes references to OFPP
Pamphlet No. 7 in FAR Part 28 and
replaces these references with
information relative to sources of data
required to verify the credit worthiness
of a financial entity offering an ILC.
Nevertheless, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis has been performed,
and is summarized as follows:
This action is necessary to remove a
reference to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7, Use of
Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and provide
updated sources of data required to verify
credit worthiness of a financial entity issuing
or confirming an ILC.
The objective of the rule is to provide upto-date and readily available information on
requirements regarding credit rating for the
financial institution issuing or confirming an
ILC.
This will apply to all contracts for services,
supplies, or construction, when a bid
guarantee or performance and payment
bonds are required. 40 U.S.C. 3131 requires
performance and payment bonds for any
construction contract exceeding $100,000;
this was raised for inflation to $150,000 (see
FAR 1.109). Any person required to furnish
a bond has the option to furnish a bond
secured by an ILC. For construction contracts
valued at $30,000 to $150,000, alternative
payment protection is required, which may
involve an ILC. Generally, agencies do not
require bonds for other than construction
contracts. According to data from the Federal
Procurement Data System, in FY 2011 there
were about 58,000 new awards for
construction and construction maintenance,
of which 41,000 were awarded to small
businesses (about 70 percent). If we estimate
that 10 percent of these awards involve an
ILC, then this rule applies to approximately
4,100 small businesses.
The rule only removes references to OFPP
Pamphlet No. 7 and replaces these references
with information relative to sources of data
required to verify an ILC that generally
replicates what was in the pamphlet. There
are no new reporting, recordkeeping, or
compliance requirements.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
No significant alternatives to the rule were
identified that would accomplish the
objectives of the rule. We do not foresee any
significant economic impact of the rule on
small entities. The basic requirements remain
unchanged; the requirements of the pamphlet
are directly stated, some of the references
have been updated, and a Web site provided
for access to a list of Nationally Recognized
Statistical Rating Organizations.
DoD, GSA, and NASA invite
comments from small business concerns
and other interested parties on the
expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this proposed rule
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (FAR case 2011–023) in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). However, there is a preexisting requirement at FAR 52.228–14
for offerors/contractors to provide the
contracting officer a credit rating that
indicates the financial institutions have
the required credit rating as of the date
of issuance of the ILC. OMB Control
Number 9000–0045, titled: Bid
Guarantees, Performance and Payment
Bonds, and Alternative Payment
Protections, covers the information
collection requirements associated with
alternative payment protections
(including ILCs) and acceptable security
for bonds (including ILCs). ILCs are
seldom offered as alternative payment
protection or security for a bid bond,
performance bond, or payment bond.
The negligible burden of providing a
credit rating along with the required ILC
is already sufficiently covered by the
approved burden hours in 9000–0045.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 28,
and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: April 25, 2013.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 1, 28,
and 52 as set forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 1 and 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION
REGULATIONS SYSTEM
1.106
[Amended]
2. Amend section 1.106, in the table
following the introductory text, by
adding in numerical sequence, FAR
segment ‘‘52.228–14’’ and its
corresponding OMB Control No. ‘‘9000–
0045’’.
■
PART 28—BONDS AND INSURANCE
3. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 28 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
26575
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Proposed Rules
4. Amend section 28.204–3 by
revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (g), and (h) to read as
follows:
■
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
28.204–3
Irrecovable Letter of Credit.
(a) Any person required to furnish a
bond has the option to furnish a bond
secured by an irrevocable letter of credit
(ILC) in an amount equal to the penal
sum required to be secured (see 28.204).
A separate ILC is required for each
bond.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Only federally insured financial
institutions rated investment grade shall
issue or confirm the ILC. Unless the
financial institution issuing the ILC had
letter of credit business of at least $25
million in the past year, ILCs over $5
million must be confirmed by another
acceptable financial institution that had
letter of credit business of at least $25
million in the past year.
(1) The offeror/contractor is required
by paragraph (d) of the clause at 52.228–
14, Irrevocable Letter of Credit, to
provide the contracting officer a credit
rating from a recognized commercial
rating service that indicates the
financial institution has the required
rating(s) as of the date of issuance of the
ILC.
(2) To support the credit rating of the
financial institution(s) issuing or
confirming the ILC, the contracting
officer shall verify the following
information:
(i) Federal insurance. Each financial
institution is federally insured.
Verification of federal insurance is
available through the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) institution
directory at the Web site https://
www2.fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp.
(ii) Current credit rating. The current
credit rating for each financial
institution is investment grade and that
the credit rating is a Nationally
Recognized Statistical Rating
Organization (NRSRO). NRSROs can be
located at the Web site https://
www.sec.gov/answers/nrsro.htm
maintained by the SEC.
(3) The rating services listed in the
Web site above use different rating
scales (e.g., AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B,
CCC, CC, C, and D; or Aaa, Aa, A, Baa,
Ba, B, Caa, Ca, and C) to provide
evaluations of institutional credit risk;
however, all such systems specify the
range of investment grade ratings (e.g.,
BBB-AAA or Baa-Aaa in the above
examples) and permit evaluation of the
relative risk associated with a specific
institution. If the contracting officer
learns that a financial institution’s
rating has dropped below investment
grade level, the contracting officer shall
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
give the contractor 30 days to substitute
an acceptable ILC or shall draw on the
ILC using the sight draft in paragraph (g)
of the clause at 52.228–14.
(h) A copy of the Uniform Customs
and Practice (UCP) for Documentary
Credits, 2006 Edition, International
Chamber of Commerce Publication No.
600, is available from: ICC Books USA,
1212 Avenue of the Americas, 21st
Floor, New York, NY 10036, Phone:
212–703–5066, Fax: 212–391–6568, EMail: iccbooks@uscib.org, Via the
Internet at: https://store.iccbooksusa.net.
inconsistent therewith, to the laws of
____________ State of confirming financial
institution.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
[Docket No. FMCSA–2012–0156]
5. Amend section 52.228–14 by
revising the date of the clause and
paragraphs (d), (e)(5), and (f)(5) to be
read as follows:
Gross Combination Weight Rating;
Definition
■
52.228–14
Irrevocable Letter of Credit.
*
*
*
*
*
Irrevocable Letter of Credit (Date)
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Only federally insured financial
institutions rated investment grade by a
commercial rating service shall issue or
confirm the ILC.
(2) Unless the financial institution issuing
the ILC had letter of credit business of at least
$25 million in the past year, ILCs over $5
million must be confirmed by another
acceptable financial institution that had letter
of credit business of at least $25 million in
the past year.
(3) The offeror/Contractor shall provide the
Contracting Officer a credit rating that
indicates the financial institutions have the
required credit rating as of the date of
issuance of the ILC.
(4) The current rating for a financial
institution is available through any of the
following rating services registered with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) as a Nationally Recognized Statistical
Rating Organization (NRSRO). NRSRO’s can
be located at the Web site https://
www.sec.gov/answers/nsro.htm maintained
by the SEC.
(e) * * *
5. This Letter of Credit is subject to the
Uniform Customs and Practice (UCP) for
Documentary Credits, International Chamber
of Commerce Publication No.
________________ (Insert version in effect at
the time of ILC issuance, e.g., ‘‘Publication
600, 2006 edition’’) and to the extent not
inconsistent therewith, to the laws of
____________ State of confirming financial
institution, if any, otherwise State of issuing
financial institution.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
5. This confirmation is subject to the
Uniform Customs and Practice (UCP) for
Documentary Credits, International Chamber
of Commerce Publication No.
________________ (Insert version in effect at
the time of ILC issuance, e.g., ‘‘Publication
600, 2006 edition’’) and to the extent not
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–10211 Filed 5–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 383 and 390
RIN 2126–AB53
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM), request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FMCSA proposes to
revise the definition of ‘‘gross
combination weight rating’’ (or GCWR)
to clarify that a GCWR is the greater of:
the GCWR specified by the
manufacturer of the power unit, if
displayed on the Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) certification
label required by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
or the sum of the gross vehicle weight
ratings (GVWRs) or gross vehicle
weights (GVWs) of the power unit and
towed unit(s), or any combination
thereof, that produces the highest value.
DATES: You may submit comments by
July 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments to the
rulemaking docket should refer to
Docket ID Number FMCSA–2012–0156
or RIN 2126–AB53, and be submitted to
the Administrator, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration using any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, DOT Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26573-26575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10211]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 28, and 52
[FAR Case 2011-023; Docket 2011-0023; Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM53
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Irrevocable Letters of Credit
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to remove all references to Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Pamphlet No. 7, Use of Irrevocable
Letters of Credit, and also provide updated sources of data required to
verify the credit worthiness of a financial entity issuing or
confirming an irrevocable letter of credit (ILC).
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or
before July 8, 2013 to be considered in the formation of the final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2011-023 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``FAR Case
2011-023.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with
``FAR Case 2011-023.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit
a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any),
and ``FAR Case 2011-023'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275 First Street NE., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2011-
023, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cecelia Davis, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-219-0202, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2011-023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to remove all references to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7, Use
of Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and provide updated sources of data
required to verify the credit worthiness of a financial entity issuing
or confirming an ILC.
OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 provided detailed guidance for implementing
policy letter 91-4, Use of Irrevocable Letters of Credit (ILC), for
Government
[[Page 26574]]
contracts. A prior FAR final rule (FAR Case 2000-605, Rescission of
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letters, 65 FR 36014) removed the
FAR references to OFPP Policy Letter 91-4 along with several other
policy letters that were rescinded by OFPP, effective March 30, 2000
(see 65 FR 16968). However, the reference to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7
remained in FAR Part 28 because the information was considered relevant
and provided, among other information, a listing of available
quantitative and qualitative credit rating institutions and resources,
formats for ILCs, and other useful data.
FAR 28.204-3 currently cites OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 at subparagraphs
(g)(1) and (h)(1) as an available resource that may be used to obtain
information on credit rating services or investment grade ratings of
financial entities issuing or confirming ILCs because it provides
overarching policy and specific guidance on the use of ILCs, but some
of the information is outdated. Therefore, instead of referencing the
OFPP Pamphlet, this rule proposes to--
(1) Extract from the OFPP Pamphlet the relevant and current
information for inclusion in the FAR; and
(2) Provide additional sources of data required to verify the
credit worthiness of a financial entity issuing or confirming an ILC,
as summarized on the Web sites of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (https://www2.fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp) and Securities and
Exchange Commission (https://www.sec.gov/answers/nsro.htm).
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect this proposed rule to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because the rule only removes references to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7
in FAR Part 28 and replaces these references with information relative
to sources of data required to verify the credit worthiness of a
financial entity offering an ILC. Nevertheless, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis has been performed, and is summarized as follows:
This action is necessary to remove a reference to OFPP Pamphlet
No. 7, Use of Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and provide updated
sources of data required to verify credit worthiness of a financial
entity issuing or confirming an ILC.
The objective of the rule is to provide up-to-date and readily
available information on requirements regarding credit rating for
the financial institution issuing or confirming an ILC.
This will apply to all contracts for services, supplies, or
construction, when a bid guarantee or performance and payment bonds
are required. 40 U.S.C. 3131 requires performance and payment bonds
for any construction contract exceeding $100,000; this was raised
for inflation to $150,000 (see FAR 1.109). Any person required to
furnish a bond has the option to furnish a bond secured by an ILC.
For construction contracts valued at $30,000 to $150,000,
alternative payment protection is required, which may involve an
ILC. Generally, agencies do not require bonds for other than
construction contracts. According to data from the Federal
Procurement Data System, in FY 2011 there were about 58,000 new
awards for construction and construction maintenance, of which
41,000 were awarded to small businesses (about 70 percent). If we
estimate that 10 percent of these awards involve an ILC, then this
rule applies to approximately 4,100 small businesses.
The rule only removes references to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 and
replaces these references with information relative to sources of
data required to verify an ILC that generally replicates what was in
the pamphlet. There are no new reporting, recordkeeping, or
compliance requirements.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
No significant alternatives to the rule were identified that
would accomplish the objectives of the rule. We do not foresee any
significant economic impact of the rule on small entities. The basic
requirements remain unchanged; the requirements of the pamphlet are
directly stated, some of the references have been updated, and a Web
site provided for access to a list of Nationally Recognized
Statistical Rating Organizations.
DoD, GSA, and NASA invite comments from small business concerns and
other interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this
proposed rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must
submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR case
2011-023) in correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
However, there is a pre-existing requirement at FAR 52.228-14 for
offerors/contractors to provide the contracting officer a credit rating
that indicates the financial institutions have the required credit
rating as of the date of issuance of the ILC. OMB Control Number 9000-
0045, titled: Bid Guarantees, Performance and Payment Bonds, and
Alternative Payment Protections, covers the information collection
requirements associated with alternative payment protections (including
ILCs) and acceptable security for bonds (including ILCs). ILCs are
seldom offered as alternative payment protection or security for a bid
bond, performance bond, or payment bond. The negligible burden of
providing a credit rating along with the required ILC is already
sufficiently covered by the approved burden hours in 9000-0045.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 28, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: April 25, 2013.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 1, 28,
and 52 as set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 1 and 52 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 1--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
1.106 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 1.106, in the table following the introductory text,
by adding in numerical sequence, FAR segment ``52.228-14'' and its
corresponding OMB Control No. ``9000-0045''.
PART 28--BONDS AND INSURANCE
0
3. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 28 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
[[Page 26575]]
0
4. Amend section 28.204-3 by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (g), and (h) to read as follows:
28.204-3 Irrecovable Letter of Credit.
(a) Any person required to furnish a bond has the option to furnish
a bond secured by an irrevocable letter of credit (ILC) in an amount
equal to the penal sum required to be secured (see 28.204). A separate
ILC is required for each bond.
* * * * *
(g) Only federally insured financial institutions rated investment
grade shall issue or confirm the ILC. Unless the financial institution
issuing the ILC had letter of credit business of at least $25 million
in the past year, ILCs over $5 million must be confirmed by another
acceptable financial institution that had letter of credit business of
at least $25 million in the past year.
(1) The offeror/contractor is required by paragraph (d) of the
clause at 52.228-14, Irrevocable Letter of Credit, to provide the
contracting officer a credit rating from a recognized commercial rating
service that indicates the financial institution has the required
rating(s) as of the date of issuance of the ILC.
(2) To support the credit rating of the financial institution(s)
issuing or confirming the ILC, the contracting officer shall verify the
following information:
(i) Federal insurance. Each financial institution is federally
insured. Verification of federal insurance is available through the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) institution directory at
the Web site https://www2.fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp.
(ii) Current credit rating. The current credit rating for each
financial institution is investment grade and that the credit rating is
a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO). NRSROs
can be located at the Web site https://www.sec.gov/answers/nrsro.htm
maintained by the SEC.
(3) The rating services listed in the Web site above use different
rating scales (e.g., AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C, and D; or Aaa,
Aa, A, Baa, Ba, B, Caa, Ca, and C) to provide evaluations of
institutional credit risk; however, all such systems specify the range
of investment grade ratings (e.g., BBB-AAA or Baa-Aaa in the above
examples) and permit evaluation of the relative risk associated with a
specific institution. If the contracting officer learns that a
financial institution's rating has dropped below investment grade
level, the contracting officer shall give the contractor 30 days to
substitute an acceptable ILC or shall draw on the ILC using the sight
draft in paragraph (g) of the clause at 52.228-14.
(h) A copy of the Uniform Customs and Practice (UCP) for
Documentary Credits, 2006 Edition, International Chamber of Commerce
Publication No. 600, is available from: ICC Books USA, 1212 Avenue of
the Americas, 21st Floor, New York, NY 10036, Phone: 212-703-5066, Fax:
212-391-6568, E-Mail: iccbooks@uscib.org, Via the Internet at: https://store.iccbooksusa.net.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
5. Amend section 52.228-14 by revising the date of the clause and
paragraphs (d), (e)(5), and (f)(5) to be read as follows:
52.228-14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit.
* * * * *
Irrevocable Letter of Credit (Date)
* * * * *
(d)(1) Only federally insured financial institutions rated
investment grade by a commercial rating service shall issue or
confirm the ILC.
(2) Unless the financial institution issuing the ILC had letter
of credit business of at least $25 million in the past year, ILCs
over $5 million must be confirmed by another acceptable financial
institution that had letter of credit business of at least $25
million in the past year.
(3) The offeror/Contractor shall provide the Contracting Officer
a credit rating that indicates the financial institutions have the
required credit rating as of the date of issuance of the ILC.
(4) The current rating for a financial institution is available
through any of the following rating services registered with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a Nationally
Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO). NRSRO's can be
located at the Web site https://www.sec.gov/answers/nsro.htm
maintained by the SEC.
(e) * * *
5. This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and
Practice (UCP) for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of
Commerce Publication No. -------------------------------- (Insert
version in effect at the time of ILC issuance, e.g., ``Publication
600, 2006 edition'') and to the extent not inconsistent therewith,
to the laws of ------------------------ State of confirming
financial institution, if any, otherwise State of issuing financial
institution.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
5. This confirmation is subject to the Uniform Customs and
Practice (UCP) for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of
Commerce Publication No. -------------------------------- (Insert
version in effect at the time of ILC issuance, e.g., ``Publication
600, 2006 edition'') and to the extent not inconsistent therewith,
to the laws of ------------------------ State of confirming
financial institution.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-10211 Filed 5-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P