Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Threatened Status for Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger Beetle and Designation of Critical Habitat, 26308-26315 [2013-10568]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
26308
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate
population
where
endangered or
threatened
Historic range
Common name
*
Prairie-chicken, lesser
*
Scientific name
*
(Tympanuchus
pallidicinctus).
*
*
U.S.A. (CO, KS, NM,
OK, TX).
*
*
3. Amend § 17.41 by adding paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 17.41
Special rules—birds.
(a) Lesser prairie-chicken
(Tympanuchus pallidicinctus).
(1) Prohibitions. Except as noted in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this
section, all prohibitions and provisions
of §§ 17.31 and 17.32 apply to the lesser
prairie-chicken.
(2) Exemptions from prohibitions.
Incidental take of the lesser prairiechicken will not be considered a
violation of section 9 of the Act if the
take results from any of the following:
(i) Implementation of a
comprehensive lesser prairie-chicken
conservation program that:
(A) Was developed by or in
coordination with the State agency or
agencies, or their agent(s), responsible
for the management and conservation of
fish and wildlife within the affected
State(s);
(B) Has a clear mechanism for
enrollment of participating landowners;
and
(C) Was determined by the Service to
provide a net conservation benefit to the
lesser prairie chicken, in consideration
of the following:
(1) Comprehensively addresses all of
the threats affecting the lesser prairiechicken within the program area;
(2) Establishes objective, measurable
biological goals and objectives for
population and habitat necessary to
ensure a net conservation benefit, and
provides the mechanisms by which
those goals and objectives will be
achieved;
(3) Includes the administrative and
funding mechanisms necessary for
effectively implementing all elements of
the program, including enrollment of
participating landowners, monitoring of
program activities, and enforcement of
program requirements;
(4) Employs an adaptive management
strategy to ensure future program
adaptation as necessary and
appropriate; and
(5) Includes appropriate monitoring of
effectiveness and compliance.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
Status
*
Entire
T
*
Dated: April 29, 2013.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–10497 Filed 5–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2012–0053;
Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020;
4500030114]
RIN 1018–AY11; 1018–AZ39
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Proposed Threatened
Status for Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger
Beetle and Designation of Critical
Habitat
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the
comment period.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce the
reopening of the public comment period
on our October 2, 2012, proposed listing
decision and proposed designation of
critical habitat for Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. We
SUMMARY:
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
*
....................
NA
*
17.41(a)
*
(D) Is periodically reviewed by the
Service as meeting the objective for
which it was originally established
under paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) of this
section.
(ii) Conservation practices on
privately owned agricultural land
which:
(A) Are carried out in accordance
with a conservation plan for such land
developed by the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS); and
(B) Were evaluated in the June 30,
2011, conference report issued by the
Service to the NRCS in connection with
the NRCS’s Lesser Prairie-Chicken
Initiative.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
When listed
Sfmt 4702
*
*
announce the availability of a draft
economic analysis (DEA), a draft
environmental assessment (EA), an
amendment to the 2009 Conservation
Agreement and Strategy for the Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle, and an
amended required determinations
section of the proposal. We also
announce the availability of 2012 Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle survey
results that were not available when the
proposed rule was being written. We are
reopening the comment period to allow
all interested parties an opportunity to
comment simultaneously on the
proposed rule, the associated DEA, the
Draft EA, the Conservation Agreement
amendment, and the amended required
determinations section. We also
announce a public hearing to be held in
Kanab, Utah.
DATES: Written Comments: We will
consider all comments received or
postmarked on or before June 5, 2013.
Comments submitted electronically
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal
(see ADDRESSES section, below) must be
received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
the closing date.
Public Information Meeting: We will
hold a public information meeting in
Kanab, Utah, on May 22, 2013, from 4
p.m. to 6 p.m. (see ADDRESSES section,
below).
Public Hearing: We will hold a public
hearing in Kanab, Utah, on May 22,
2013, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. (see
ADDRESSES section, below).
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You
may obtain copies of the proposed rule
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2012–0053 or by
contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Utah Field Office, Ecological
Services Field Office directly (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). You
may obtain a copy of the draft economic
analysis (DEA), the draft environmental
assessment (Draft EA), the 2009
Conservation Agreement and Strategy
for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle (Conservation Agreement)
amendment, and the 2012 Coral Pink
Sand Dunes tiger beetle survey results at
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
Number FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020, or by
contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Utah Field Office, Ecological
Services Field Office directly (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Written Comments: You may submit
comments by one of the following
methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
on the listing proposal to Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2012–0053, and submit
comments on the critical habitat
proposal and associated DEA and Draft
EA to Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–
0020. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
for an explanation of the two dockets.
(2) By hard copy: Submit comments
on the listing proposal by U.S. mail or
hand-delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R6–ES–2012–
0053; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS
2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
Submit comments on the critical habitat
proposal, DEA, and Draft EA by U.S.
mail or hand-delivery to: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R6–
ES–2013–0020; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
MS 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
(3) Public Information Meeting and
Public Hearing: Both the public
information meeting and the public
hearing will be held at the Kanab City
Library, 374 North Main, Kanab, Utah
84741.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Crist, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Utah Field Office,
Ecological Services Field Office, 2369
West Orton Circle, Suite 50, West Valley
City, Utah 84119; telephone 801–975–
3330; or facsimile 801–975–3331.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We will accept written comments and
information during this reopened
comment period on: (1) Our proposed
listing as threatened and proposed
critical habitat designation for Coral
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle that was
published in the Federal Register on
October 2, 2012 (77 FR 60208); (2) our
DEA of the proposed designation; (3)
our Draft EA; (4) the Conservation
Agreement amendment; (5) 2012 Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle surveys
and how this information should be
considered in the designation of critical
habitat; and (6) our amendment of
required determinations. We will
consider information and
recommendations from all interested
parties. We are also notifying the public
that we will publish two separate rules
for the final listing determination and
the final critical habitat determination
for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle. The final listing rule will publish
under the existing Docket No. FWS–R6–
ES–2012–0053, and the final critical
habitat designation will publish under
Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020.
We request that you provide
comments specifically on our listing
determination under Docket No. FWS–
R6–ES–2012–0053.
We request that you provide
comments specifically on the critical
habitat determination and related DEA
and Draft EA under Docket No. FWS–
R6–ES–2013–0020. We are particularly
interested in comments concerning:
(1) The reasons why we should or
should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical
habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) including whether
there are threats to these species from
human activity, the degree of which can
be expected to increase due to the
designation, and whether that increase
in threat outweighs the benefit of
designation such that the designation of
critical habitat may not be prudent;
(2) Specific information on:
(a) The amount and distribution of
Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle
habitat;
(b) What areas that are occupied and
that contain features essential to the
conservation of this species should be
included in the designation and why;
(c) Special management
considerations or protection that may be
needed in the critical habitat area we are
proposing, including managing for the
potential effects of climate change;
(d) What areas not occupied at the
time of listing are essential for the
conservation of these species and why;
and
(e) Means to quantify the amount of
natural and human-caused disturbance
this species prefers or can tolerate.
(3) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject area
and their possible impacts on proposed
critical habitat.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26309
(4) Information on the projected and
reasonably likely impacts of climate
change on the Coral Pink Sand Dunes
tiger beetle and proposed critical
habitat.
(5) Any probable economic, national
security, or other relevant impacts of
designating any area that may be
included in the final designation; in
particular, any impacts on small entities
or families, and the benefits of including
or excluding areas that exhibit these
impacts.
(6) Whether any specific areas we are
proposing for critical habitat
designation should be considered for
exclusion under section 4(b)(2) of the
Act, and whether the benefits of
potentially excluding any specific area
outweigh the benefits of including that
area under section 4(b)(2) of the Act.
(7) Whether our approach to
designating critical habitat could be
improved or modified in any way to
provide for greater public participation
and understanding, or to better
accommodate public concerns and
comments.
(8) Information on the extent to which
the description of potential economic
impacts in the DEA is complete and
accurate.
(9) Whether the DEA makes
appropriate assumptions regarding
current practices and any regulatory
changes that will likely occur if we
designate critical habitat.
(10) Whether the DEA correctly
assesses the effect of regional costs
associated with land use controls that
may result from the designation of
critical habitat.
(11) Whether the DEA identifies all
Federal, State, and local costs and
benefits attributable to the proposed
designation of critical habitat, and
information on any costs that have been
inadvertently overlooked.
(12) Whether the Draft EA adequately
presents the purpose of and need for the
proposed action, the proposed action
and alternatives, and the evaluation of
the direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects of the alternatives.
(13) Whether the amended
Conservation Agreement for the Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle provides
sufficient conservation measures to
reduce threats to the species.
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning our proposed rule
or the associated DEA and draft EA by
one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
26310
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
DEA, and Draft EA, will be available for
public inspection on https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2012–0053 and Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020, or by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Utah Ecological Services Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
You may obtain copies of the proposed
critical habitat, the DEA, the
Conservation Agreement amendment,
and the Draft EA on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FWS–R6–ES–2012–0053 and Docket
No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020, or at
https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/
species/invertebrates/
CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/
index.html, or by mail from the Utah
Ecological Services Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Background
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Previous Federal Actions
It is our intent to discuss only those
topics directly relevant to the proposed
designation of critical habitat for the
Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle and
our consideration of the Conservation
Agreement amendment relative to the
proposed listing rule. For more
information on previous Federal actions
and the biology of the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle, refer to the proposed
listing rule and proposed designation of
critical habitat published in the Federal
Register on October 2, 2012 (77 FR
60208), which is available online at
https://www.regulations.gov (at Docket
No. FWS–R6–ES–2012–0053 or Docket
No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020).
In total, we proposed approximately
921 hectares (ha) (2,276 acres (ac)) in
Kane County, Utah, for designation as
critical habitat in our October 2, 2012,
proposed rule. However, the 2012 Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle surveys
found beetle adults and larvae in habitat
adjacent to the proposed critical habitat
area (Knisley and Gowan 2013, pp. 12–
13). Therefore, based on the availability
of this new information, we request that
the public review this data and provide
input on how it might be considered for
the designation of critical habitat (see
2012 Survey Information, below).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
The original proposal had a 60-day
public comment period, ending
November 16, 2012. We will publish in
the Federal Register a final listing
decision and final critical habitat
designation for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle on or before the
statutory deadline of October 2, 2013.
Section 3 of the Act defines critical
habitat as the specific areas within the
geographical area occupied by the
species, at the time it is listed in
accordance with the Act, on which are
found those physical or biological
features essential to the conservation of
the species and that may require special
management considerations or
protection; and specific areas outside
the geographical area occupied by the
species at the time it is listed upon a
determination that such areas are
essential for the conservation of the
species. If the proposed rule is made
final, section 7 of the Act will prohibit
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat by any activity funded,
authorized, or carried out by any
Federal agency. Federal agencies
proposing actions that affect critical
habitat must consult with us on the
effects of their proposed actions, under
section 7(a)(2) of the Act.
Our October 2, 2012, proposed rule
evaluated the 2009 Conservation
Agreement for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle. The 2009
Conservation Agreement resulted in the
establishment of two Conservation
Areas that protect the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle from off-road vehicle
use. Based on new survey information,
we have worked with the State of Utah
and Bureau of Land Management to
amend the 2009 Conservation
Agreement and expand the protected
habitats for the species (see
Conservation Agreement Amendment,
below). We are seeking public comment
on this amendment, including whether
it provides sufficient conservation
measures to reduce threats to the
species to the point it does not meet the
definition of threatened or endangered
under the Act.
Consideration of Impacts Under Section
4(b)(2) of the Act
Section 4(b)(2) of the Act requires that
we designate or revise critical habitat
based upon the best scientific data
available, after taking into consideration
the economic impact, impact on
national security, or any other relevant
impact of specifying any particular area
as critical habitat. We may exclude an
area from critical habitat if we
determine that the benefits of excluding
the area outweigh the benefits of
including the area as critical habitat,
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provided such exclusion will not result
in the extinction of the species.
When considering the benefits of
inclusion for an area, we consider the
additional regulatory benefits that the
area would receive from the protection
from adverse modification or
destruction as a result of actions with a
Federal nexus (activities conducted,
funded, permitted, or authorized by
Federal agencies), the educational
benefits of mapping areas containing
essential features that aid in the
recovery of the listed species, and any
benefits that may result from the
designation due to State or Federal laws
that may apply to critical habitat.
When considering the benefits of
exclusion, we consider, among other
things, whether exclusion of a specific
area is likely to result in conservation;
the continuation, strengthening, or
encouragement of partnerships; or
implementation of a management plan.
In the case of the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle, the benefits of
critical habitat designation include
public awareness of the presence of
these species and the importance of
habitat protection, and, where a Federal
action exists, increased habitat
protection for these species due to
protection from adverse modification or
destruction of critical habitat. In
practice, situations with a Federal
action occur primarily on Federal lands
or for projects implemented, funded, or
permitted by Federal agencies.
The final decision on whether to
exclude any areas will be based on the
best scientific data available at the time
of the final designation, including
information obtained during the
comment period and information about
the economic impact of designation.
Accordingly, we have prepared a DEA
concerning the economic effects of the
proposed critical habitat designation,
which is available for review and
comment (see ADDRESSES).
Draft Economic Analysis
The purpose of the DEA is to identify
and analyze the potential economic
impacts associated with the proposed
critical habitat designation for the Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle. The DEA
also describes the economic impacts of
all potential conservation efforts for the
Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle.
Some of these costs will likely be
incurred regardless of whether or not we
designate critical habitat.
The economic impact of the proposed
critical habitat designation is analyzed
by comparing scenarios both ‘‘with
critical habitat’’ and ‘‘without critical
habitat.’’ The ‘‘without critical habitat’’
scenario represents the baseline for the
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
analysis, considering protections
already in place for the species (e.g.,
under the Federal listing and other
Federal, State, and local regulations).
Therefore, the baseline represents the
costs incurred regardless of whether
critical habitat is designated. The ‘‘with
critical habitat’’ scenario describes the
incremental impacts associated
specifically with the designation of
critical habitat for the species. The
incremental conservation efforts and
associated impacts are those not
expected to occur absent the designation
of critical habitat for the species. In
other words, the incremental costs are
those attributable solely to the
designation of critical habitat above and
beyond the baseline costs; these are the
costs we may consider in the final
designation of critical habitat. The
analysis looks at baseline impacts
incurred as a result of the species
listing, and forecasts both baseline and
incremental impacts likely to occur if
we finalize the proposed critical habitat
designation.
In light of the 10th Circuit U.S. Court
of Appeals ruling in New Mexico Cattle
Growers Association v. United States
Fish and Wildlife Service, the DEA also
considers the coextensive cost impacts
of the critical habitat’s protection.
Coextensive impacts include the
baseline impacts, which are a result of
the listing, and incremental impacts,
which are solely attributable to the
designation of critical habitat.
The DEA provides estimated costs of
the foreseeable potential economic
impacts of the proposed critical habitat
designation for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle over the next 20
years, which was determined to be the
appropriate period for analysis because
planning information was available for
most activities to reasonably forecast
activity levels for projects for a 20-year
timeframe. The DEA identifies potential
incremental costs as a result of the
proposed critical habitat designation;
these are the costs attributed to critical
habitat over and above those baseline
costs attributed to listing. The DEA
quantifies economic impacts of
conservation efforts for the Coral Pink
Sand Dunes tiger beetle associated with
the following categories of activity: (1)
Bureau of Land Management Kanab
Field Office Resource Management Plan
administration; (2) off-road vehicle
(ORV) related consumer surplus losses
(i.e., economic measure of consumer
satisfaction—ORV restrictions might
result in some consumers feeling like
they were not receiving sufficient
recreational enjoyment for the expenses
of traveling to and staying in the area);
(3) consultation on a Coral Pink Sand
Dunes State Park incidental take permit;
(4) other management activities; and (5)
conservation activities.
The proposed critical habitat
designation for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle will result in minimal
incremental costs because the proposed
critical habitat is occupied by the
species or likely used as a dispersal
corridor between occupied habitats and
we would expect costs beyond those
26311
attributable to the species listing
(baseline costs) to be minimal (see
discussion below). Furthermore, the
baseline protections afforded by existing
conservation activities partially address
ORV use, which is one of the primary
threats to the species and its habitat (77
FR 60208). Table 1 summarizes the
coextensive economic impacts of the
proposed listing and critical habitat.
Coextensive impacts to economic
activities are anticipated to be
associated primarily with the
administrative costs of Section 7
consultations, development of
incidental take permits, and consumer
surplus losses from anticipated ORV
restrictions in the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes State Park. The cost of these
impacts is estimated to be
approximately $225,298 over the next
20 years, at an annualized cost of
$13,416. Costs associated with
conservation activities that are
indirectly attributable to the listing are
projected to be $538,441 (Table 1). In
addition, ORV visitors to BLM land
adjacent to the State Park would
potentially lose consumer surplus, but
these costs are unquantified because of
a lack of reliable visitation data.
Additional information can be found in
the DEA, which is available at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020 and at https://
www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/
invertebrates/
CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/
index.html.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF COEXTENSIVE IMPACTS TO ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS (INCLUDING A 7
PERCENT DISCOUNT RATE) PERTAINING TO CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE CORAL PINK SAND DUNES
TIGER BEETLE
Economic activities
Reinitiation of
BLM RMP
OHV-Related
consumer
surplus losses
$29,655
25,400
1,270
$275,698
156,260
7,813
Undiscounted ...........................................
Net Present Vaule @ 7% ........................
Average Annual Discounted Cost ............
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
a Undiscounted
$2,263
a 2,263
a 2,263
Other
management
activities
$73,000
41,375
2,069
Conservation
activities
$950,000
538,441
26,922
Total
coextensive
$1,330,616
763,738
40,337
because the action is expected to take place in 2013.
Incremental costs associated with the
designation of critical habitat are
expected to be minimal. Designation of
critical habitat for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle is not likely to result
in additional consultations since the
proposed designated critical habitat unit
is occupied. Therefore, actions that
would affect critical habitat would also
affect the species present in the
occupied Unit of critical habitat.
However, the designation of critical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
State park
incidental
take permit
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
habitat would result in direct
incremental administrative costs to
address adverse modification analyses,
although these would be minimal. With
no critical habitat designated outside
the Coral Pink Sand Dunes habitat
range, all indirect conservation costs or
benefits are considered part of the
baseline. No additional project
modifications are expected relative to
the baseline. Costs associated with
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reinitiating consultations will also be
considered part of the baseline.
We are seeking data and comments
from the public on the DEA. We may
revise the proposed rule or supporting
documents to incorporate or address
information we receive during the
public comment period. In particular,
we may exclude an area from critical
habitat if we determine that the benefits
of excluding the area outweigh the
benefits of including the area, provided
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
26312
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the exclusion will not result in the
extinction of the species.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Draft Environmental Assessment;
National Environmental Policy Act
When the range of a species includes
States within the U.S. Tenth Circuit
Court of Appeals, pursuant to the ruling
in Catron County Board of
Commissioners v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 75 F .3d 1429 (10th Cir. 1996),
we will complete an analysis under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (NEPA) on
critical habitat designations. The range
of Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle is
entirely within the State of Utah, which
is within the Tenth Circuit.
The Draft EA presents the purpose of
and need for critical habitat designation,
the proposed action and alternatives,
and an evaluation of the direct, indirect,
and cumulative effects of the
alternatives under the requirements of
NEPA as implemented by the Council
on Environmental Quality regulations
(40 CFR 1500 through 1518) and
according to the Department of the
Interior’s NEPA procedures.
The Draft EA will be used by the
Service to decide whether or not critical
habitat will be designated as proposed;
if the proposed action requires
refinement, or if another alternative is
appropriate; or if further analyses are
needed through preparation of an
environmental impact statement. If the
proposed action is selected as described
(or is changed minimally) and no
further environmental analyses are
needed, then a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) would be the
appropriate conclusion of this process.
A FONSI would then be prepared for
the environmental assessment. We are
seeking data and comments from the
public on the draft EA, which is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
at Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020
and at https://www.fws.gov/mountainprairie/species/invertebrates/
CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/
index.html.
2012 Survey Information
A survey for Coral Pink Sand Dunes
tiger beetle was conducted south of
Conservation Area A in 2012, and we
request that the public review this data
and provide input on how it is
considered for the designation of critical
habitat (Knisley and Gowan 2013,
entire). Researchers found a total of 16
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
adults and 13 larvae singly or in small
numbers throughout the area directly
south of Conservation Area A (Knisley
and Gowan 2013, pp. 12–13). Large
numbers of adult tiger beetles were also
found in this area in earlier years (1998–
2000) (Knisley and Gowan 2013, pp. 12–
13), but this area was not included in
our October 2, 2012, proposed critical
habitat designation because beetles were
generally not observed there for a
decade. As described in our October 2,
2012, proposed rule, the area supports
the following primary constituent
elements: (1) Elevations from 5,610 to
6,857 feet (1,710 to 2,090 meters); (2)
appropriate levels of moisture and
compaction to allow for burrowing
(greater than 3 percent); and (3)
vegetative cover of 23–57 percent that
allows for ovipositing, adult
thermoregulation, and abundant prey
(77 FR 60208). Portions of this area are
also included in the Conservation
Agreement amendment (see
Conservation Agreement Amendment,
below). We seek comments from the
public on the survey results, which are
available at https://www.regulations.gov
at Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0020
and at https://www.fws.gov/mountainprairie/species/invertebrates/
CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/
index.html.
Conservation Agreement Amendment
Initially formalized in 1997
(Conservation Committee 1997, entire),
and revised in 2009 (Conservation
Committee 2009, entire), the
Conservation Agreement for the Coral
Pink Sand Dunes Tiger Beetle is a
partnership for the development and
implementation of conservation
measures to protect the tiger beetle and
its habitat. The purpose of the
partnership is to ensure the long-term
persistence of the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle within its historical
range and provide a framework for
future conservation efforts. The Utah
Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Parks and Recreation,
Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and
Kane County, Utah, are signatories to
these agreements and comprise the
conservation committee. The
conservation committee has
implemented conservation actions to
benefit the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle and its habitat, monitored their
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
effectiveness, and adapted strategies as
new information became available.
Coordination under the Conservation
Agreement resulted in the establishment
of two Conservation Areas that protect
the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle
from ORV use—Conservation Areas A
and B (see our proposed rule (77 FR
60208, October 2, 2012) for more
information on these Conservation
Areas).
On March 21, 2013, signatories to the
Conservation Agreement signed an
amendment (Amendment to the 2009
Conservation Agreement and Strategy
for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger
Beetle (Cicindela albissima))
(Conservation Committee 2013, entire)
to the 2009 Conservation Agreement
that outlines several new conservation
actions that will be enacted to address
the threats that were identified in the
October 2, 2012, proposed rule (77 FR
60208). The amendment evaluates the
most recent tiger beetle survey
information (Knisley and Gowan 2013,
entire; see 2012 Survey Information,
above) and concludes that modifications
to the boundaries of the Conservation
Areas are needed to ensure continued
protection of the tiger beetle from
ongoing threats (see below description
of threats). The amendment enlarges
Conservation Area A by 29 percent from
84 to 108 ha (207 to 266 ac). The
expansion of Conservation Area A
protects 88 percent of the species’
population from ORV use. In addition,
the amendment provides protection for
islands of habitat between Conservation
Areas A and B (an additional 106 ha
(263 ac)), with the intent of providing
dispersal habitat for the species.
Overall, the Conservation Agreement
amendment addresses the following
threats to the Coral Pink Sand Dunes
tiger beetle: (1) Habitat loss and
degradation caused by off-road vehicle
use; (2) small population effects, such as
vulnerability to random chance events;
(3) the effects of climate change and
drought; and (4) cumulative interaction
of individual factors such as off-road
vehicle use, climate change, and
drought (77 FR 60208, October 2, 2012)
(Table 3). Additional information can be
found in the Conservation Agreement
amendment, which can be obtained as
specified at the beginning of this
document (see ADDRESSES: Document
Availability).
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
26313
TABLE 2—THREATS TO THE CORAL PINK SAND DUNES TIGER BEETLE AS IDENTIFIED IN THE OCTOBER 2, 2012, PROPOSED LISTING DECISION AND PROPOSED DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT, AND PLANNED ACTIONS TO ADDRESS
THOSE THREATS THROUGH THE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT AND STRATEGY AMENDMENT
Threat
Planned action
Habitat loss/degradation
and mortality associated with ORV use.
• Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation agrees to expand the boundary of Conservation Area A to protect additional habitat while addressing diversity in recreation and maintaining safety standards for dune visitors. This area will be expanded in the 2013 field season from 84 to 108 ha (207 to 266 ac), thus
increasing protection of tiger beetle occupied swales from 48 percent to 88 percent. All new or expanded habitat
areas will be demarcated with carsonite marking posts to facilitate compliance by Park visitors.
• Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation and the BLM will protect vegetated habitat
islands of connectivity between the southern and northern conservation areas and monitor to ensure compliance.
This action will occur in 2013 and will protect 106 ha (263 ac) of additional sand dune habitat comprising 14 individual habitat patches, which range in size from 1 to 15 ha (2.6 to 37 ac). All new or expanded habitat areas will be
demarcated with carsonite marking posts to facilitate compliance by Park visitors.
• Tiger beetle adults and larvae were found to the south of Conservation Area A in 2012. The conservation committee
will visit this area in spring of 2013 to determine any additional habitats that should be protected to support the tiger
beetle. The size and configuration of any protected areas will be determined during the 2013 field season with input
from all members of the conservation committee. All new or expanded habitat areas will be demarcated with
carsonite posts to facilitate compliance by Park visitors.
• The conservation committee will analyze available historic aerial imagery and other data to better understand dune
movement and associated vegetation changes as they relate to beetle occupation and suitable habitat over time.
Knowledge of dune movement patterns will be used in adaptive management planning to accommodate dune
changes and the need to alter conservation area boundaries.
• The conservation committee will conduct experimental vegetation treatments within existing conservation areas to
determine if this activity could be an effective mechanism to increase suitable habitat.
• The conservation committee will revisit conservation area boundaries on a routine cycle (every 3 years) and make
necessary adjustments as a result of shifting dunes, vegetation changes, population increases and decreases, and
resulting changes to suitable habitat.
• Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation and the BLM will continue efforts in law
enforcement, education, and outreach.
• We are not aware of any additional populations of Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetles outside of the Coral Pink
Sand Dunes geologic feature. However, the conservation committee believes it is appropriate to continue surveys
for the species and suitable habitat in the area. The conservation committee will identify potential habitat within an
80-km (50-mi) radius of the Coral Pink Sand Dunes using aerial imagery, and survey for tiger beetle presence and
habitat suitability. If appropriate habitat is found, the area will be considered for experimental introduction.
• The conservation committee will increase research efforts in experimental translocations in Conservation Area B and
evaluate new habitat islands for appropriateness for reintroduction efforts.
• The conservation committee will introduce individuals into suitable habitats (potential sites have been identified),
monitor these sites, and revise translocation activities via an adaptive management process.
• The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation and the BLM have done a creditable
job of enforcing the protection boundaries of Conservation Areas A and B for approximately the last 15 years. This
amendment increases the size of Conservation Area A by 24 ha (59 ac), and the conservation committee will consider further protection of habitats to the south of Conservation Area A (see Habitat loss/degradation and mortality
associated with ORV use, above). In addition, the amendment establishes 14 habitat patches to support dispersal of
tiger beetles between Conservation Areas A and B, increasing the total protected area by an additional 106 ha (263
ac). Because these signatory agencies have complied with the Conservation Agreement and Strategy for the last 15
years, we can reasonably conclude that the BLM and Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and
Recreation will continue to properly enforce the boundaries of all protected areas.
• The BLM is installing a weather station onsite in spring 2013 to better correlate weather patterns with beetle abundance. Understanding the effects of weather patterns on Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle populations may help
us develop adaptive management strategies by identifying important habitat use areas during particularly warm or
dry years.
• The establishment of 14 additional habitat patches totaling 106 ha (263 ac) will occur at higher elevations in the
sand dune area, and at locations that provide significant vegetated habitat. This effort has the potential to offset the
drying and warming effects of climate change and drought on Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle habitat. In addition these habitat patches will provide dispersal habitat and connectivity between Conservation Areas A and B,
which will better allow the tiger beetle to disperse to potentially cooler and wetter habitat that occurs in Conservation
Area B.
• Addressing the threats listed above independently will prevent these threats from acting cumulatively.
Vulnerability to
stochastic events due
to small population
size.
Inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms.
Climate change and
drought.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Cumulative effects of
the above.
Required Determinations—Amended
In our October 2, 2012, proposed rule
(77 FR 60208), we indicated that we
would defer our determination of
compliance with several statutes and
Executive Orders (EOs) until the
information concerning potential
economic impacts of the designation
and potential effects on landowners and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
stakeholders became available in the
DEA. We have now made use of the
DEA data in making these
determinations. In this document, we
affirm the information in our proposed
rule concerning E.O. 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), E.O. 12630
(Takings), E.O. 13132 (Federalism), E.O.
12988 (Civil Justice Reform), the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act, E.O. 12866
and E.O. 12988 (Clarity of the Rule), and
the President’s memorandum of April
29, 1994, ‘‘Government-to-Government
Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951). However,
based on the DEA data, we are
amending our required determinations
concerning the Regulatory Flexibility
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
26314
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), E.O. 13211
(Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use),
and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996), whenever an
agency must publish a notice of
rulemaking for any proposed or final
rule, it must prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory
flexibility analysis that describes the
effects of the rule on small entities (i.e.,
small businesses, small organizations,
and small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of the
agency certifies the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Based on our DEA of the proposed
designation, we provide our analysis for
determining whether the proposed rule
would result in a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Based on comments we receive,
we may revise this determination as part
of our final rulemaking.
According to the Small Business
Administration, small entities include
small organizations, such as
independent nonprofit organizations,
and small governmental jurisdictions,
including school boards and city and
town governments that serve fewer than
50,000 residents, as well as small
businesses (13 CFR 121.201). Small
businesses include manufacturing and
mining concerns with fewer than 500
employees, wholesale trade entities
with fewer than 100 employees, retail
and service businesses with less than $5
million in annual sales, general and
heavy construction businesses with less
than $27.5 million in annual business,
special trade contractors doing less than
$11.5 million in annual business, and
agricultural businesses with annual
sales less than $750,000. To determine
if potential economic impacts to these
small entities are significant, we
considered the types of activities that
might trigger regulatory impacts under
the rule, as well as the types of project
modifications that may result. In
general, the term ‘‘significant economic
impact’’ is meant to apply to a typical
small business firm’s business
operations.
A significant economic impact
threshold is generally a 3 percent
impact as measured by appropriate
quantitative metrics, such as annualized
cost of compliance as a percentage of
sales, government revenue, or annual
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
operating expenditures. In general, if
more than 20 percent of the affected
small entities experience a significant
economic impact, then there is
considered to be a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
and a regulatory flexibility analysis
must be prepared.
For there to be a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities
associated with designating critical
habitat, then the incremental direct
compliance costs must exceed the 3
percent threshold for more than 20
percent of the affected small entities.
Since the Service, BLM, and Coral Pink
Sand Dunes State Park are the only
entities with expected direct
compliance costs and are not considered
small entities, this rule will not result in
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
However, small entities, such as Kane
County, ORV tour and rental businesses,
and other local tourism-related
businesses, may be indirectly affected as
a result of the proposed listing and
critical habitat designation. Because
motorized visitors to the dunes may be
further restricted access in the dune area
than under the current boundaries, ORV
use and rentals may be displaced or
reduced, impacting the ORV rental
entities and any businesses the visitors
might frequent as part of their overall
trip.
Executive Order 13211—Energy Supply,
Distribution, and Use
E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,
requires agencies to prepare Statements
of Energy Effects when undertaking
certain actions. The Office of
Management and Budget’s guidance for
implementing this Executive order
outlines nine outcomes that may
constitute ‘‘a significant adverse effect’’
when compared to no regulatory action.
Critical habitat designation for Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle is not
anticipated to affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. Therefore,
designation of critical habitat is not
expected to lead to any adverse
outcomes (such as a reduction in oil and
natural gas production or distribution),
and a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.), we make the following findings:
(a) This rule will not produce a
Federal mandate. In general, a Federal
mandate is a provision in legislation,
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
statute, or regulation that would impose
an enforceable duty upon State, local, or
Tribal governments, or the private
sector, and includes both ‘‘Federal
intergovernmental mandates’’ and
‘‘Federal private sector mandates.’’
These terms are defined in 2 U.S.C.
658(5)–(7). ‘‘Federal intergovernmental
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon State, local, or Tribal
governments,’’ with two exceptions.
First, it excludes ‘‘a condition of federal
assistance.’’ Second, it excludes ‘‘a duty
arising from participation in a voluntary
Federal program,’’ unless the regulation
‘‘relates to a then-existing Federal
program under which $500,000,000 or
more is provided annually to State,
local, and Tribal governments under
entitlement authority,’’ if the provision
would ‘‘increase the stringency of
conditions of assistance’’ or ‘‘place caps
upon, or otherwise decrease, the Federal
Government’s responsibility to provide
funding’’ and the State, local, or Tribal
governments ‘‘lack authority’’ to adjust
accordingly. At the time of enactment,
these entitlement programs were:
Medicaid; Aid to Families with
Dependent Children work programs;
Child Nutrition; Food Stamps; Social
Services Block Grants; Vocational
Rehabilitation State Grants; Foster Care,
Adoption Assistance, and Independent
Living; Family Support Welfare
Services; and Child Support
Enforcement. ‘‘Federal private sector
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon the private sector, except (i) a
condition of Federal assistance; or (ii) a
duty arising from participation in a
voluntary Federal program.’’
The designation of critical habitat
does not impose a legally binding duty
on non-Federal government entities or
private parties. Under the Act, the only
regulatory effect is that Federal agencies
must ensure that their actions do not
destroy or adversely modify critical
habitat under section 7. While nonFederal entities that receive Federal
funding, assistance, or permits, or that
otherwise require approval or
authorization from a Federal agency for
an action, may be indirectly impacted
by the designation of critical habitat, the
legally binding duty to avoid
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat rests squarely on the
Federal agency. Furthermore, to the
extent that non-Federal entities are
indirectly impacted because they
receive Federal assistance or participate
in a voluntary Federal aid program, the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act would
not apply, nor would critical habitat
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
shift the costs of the large entitlement
programs listed above on to State
governments.
(b) As discussed in the DEA of the
proposed designation of critical habitat
for Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle,
we do not believe that the rule would
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments because it would not
produce a Federal mandate of $100
million or greater in any year; that is, it
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act. The DEA concludes that
incremental impacts may occur due to
project modifications and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
administrative costs of consultation that
may need to be made for grazing,
maintenance, and recreational activities;
however, these are not expected to affect
small governments to the extent
described above. Consequently, we do
not believe that the proposed critical
habitat designation would significantly
or uniquely affect small government
entities. As such, a Small Government
Agency Plan is not required.
26315
https://www.regulations.gov or by
contacting the Utah Ecological Services
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this document
are the staff members of the Utah
Ecological Services Office.
References Cited
A complete list of all references we
cited in the proposed rule and in this
document is available on the Internet at
Dated: April 26, 2013.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013–10568 Filed 5–3–13; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 87 (Monday, May 6, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26308-26315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10568]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2012-0053; Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020;
4500030114]
RIN 1018-AY11; 1018-AZ39
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed
Threatened Status for Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger Beetle and
Designation of Critical Habitat
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the reopening
of the public comment period on our October 2, 2012, proposed listing
decision and proposed designation of critical habitat for Coral Pink
Sand Dunes tiger beetle under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. We announce the availability of a draft economic analysis
(DEA), a draft environmental assessment (EA), an amendment to the 2009
Conservation Agreement and Strategy for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle, and an amended required determinations section of the proposal.
We also announce the availability of 2012 Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle survey results that were not available when the proposed rule
was being written. We are reopening the comment period to allow all
interested parties an opportunity to comment simultaneously on the
proposed rule, the associated DEA, the Draft EA, the Conservation
Agreement amendment, and the amended required determinations section.
We also announce a public hearing to be held in Kanab, Utah.
DATES: Written Comments: We will consider all comments received or
postmarked on or before June 5, 2013. Comments submitted electronically
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below)
must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.
Public Information Meeting: We will hold a public information
meeting in Kanab, Utah, on May 22, 2013, from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. (see
ADDRESSES section, below).
Public Hearing: We will hold a public hearing in Kanab, Utah, on
May 22, 2013, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. (see ADDRESSES section, below).
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You may obtain copies of the proposed
rule on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-
R6-ES-2012-0053 or by contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Utah Field Office, Ecological Services Field Office directly (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). You may obtain a copy of the draft
economic analysis (DEA), the draft environmental assessment (Draft EA),
the 2009 Conservation Agreement and Strategy for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle (Conservation Agreement) amendment, and the 2012
Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle survey results at
[[Page 26309]]
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket Number FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020, or by
contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Utah Field Office,
Ecological Services Field Office directly (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Written Comments: You may submit comments by one of the following
methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments on the listing proposal to Docket
No. FWS-R6-ES-2012-0053, and submit comments on the critical habitat
proposal and associated DEA and Draft EA to Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2013-
0020. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for an explanation of the two
dockets.
(2) By hard copy: Submit comments on the listing proposal by U.S.
mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R6-ES-
2012-0053; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042-PDM; Arlington, VA
22203. Submit comments on the critical habitat proposal, DEA, and Draft
EA by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn:
FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042-PDM;
Arlington, VA 22203.
(3) Public Information Meeting and Public Hearing: Both the public
information meeting and the public hearing will be held at the Kanab
City Library, 374 North Main, Kanab, Utah 84741.
We request that you send comments only by the methods described
above. We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any personal information you provide
us (see the Public Comments section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Crist, Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Utah Field Office, Ecological Services Field
Office, 2369 West Orton Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, Utah 84119;
telephone 801-975-3330; or facsimile 801-975-3331. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We will accept written comments and information during this
reopened comment period on: (1) Our proposed listing as threatened and
proposed critical habitat designation for Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle that was published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2012
(77 FR 60208); (2) our DEA of the proposed designation; (3) our Draft
EA; (4) the Conservation Agreement amendment; (5) 2012 Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle surveys and how this information should be
considered in the designation of critical habitat; and (6) our
amendment of required determinations. We will consider information and
recommendations from all interested parties. We are also notifying the
public that we will publish two separate rules for the final listing
determination and the final critical habitat determination for the
Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle. The final listing rule will publish
under the existing Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2012-0053, and the final
critical habitat designation will publish under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-
2013-0020.
We request that you provide comments specifically on our listing
determination under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2012-0053.
We request that you provide comments specifically on the critical
habitat determination and related DEA and Draft EA under Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020. We are particularly interested in comments
concerning:
(1) The reasons why we should or should not designate habitat as
``critical habitat'' under section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) including whether there are threats to these species from human
activity, the degree of which can be expected to increase due to the
designation, and whether that increase in threat outweighs the benefit
of designation such that the designation of critical habitat may not be
prudent;
(2) Specific information on:
(a) The amount and distribution of Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle habitat;
(b) What areas that are occupied and that contain features
essential to the conservation of this species should be included in the
designation and why;
(c) Special management considerations or protection that may be
needed in the critical habitat area we are proposing, including
managing for the potential effects of climate change;
(d) What areas not occupied at the time of listing are essential
for the conservation of these species and why; and
(e) Means to quantify the amount of natural and human-caused
disturbance this species prefers or can tolerate.
(3) Land use designations and current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts on proposed critical habitat.
(4) Information on the projected and reasonably likely impacts of
climate change on the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle and proposed
critical habitat.
(5) Any probable economic, national security, or other relevant
impacts of designating any area that may be included in the final
designation; in particular, any impacts on small entities or families,
and the benefits of including or excluding areas that exhibit these
impacts.
(6) Whether any specific areas we are proposing for critical
habitat designation should be considered for exclusion under section
4(b)(2) of the Act, and whether the benefits of potentially excluding
any specific area outweigh the benefits of including that area under
section 4(b)(2) of the Act.
(7) Whether our approach to designating critical habitat could be
improved or modified in any way to provide for greater public
participation and understanding, or to better accommodate public
concerns and comments.
(8) Information on the extent to which the description of potential
economic impacts in the DEA is complete and accurate.
(9) Whether the DEA makes appropriate assumptions regarding current
practices and any regulatory changes that will likely occur if we
designate critical habitat.
(10) Whether the DEA correctly assesses the effect of regional
costs associated with land use controls that may result from the
designation of critical habitat.
(11) Whether the DEA identifies all Federal, State, and local costs
and benefits attributable to the proposed designation of critical
habitat, and information on any costs that have been inadvertently
overlooked.
(12) Whether the Draft EA adequately presents the purpose of and
need for the proposed action, the proposed action and alternatives, and
the evaluation of the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the
alternatives.
(13) Whether the amended Conservation Agreement for the Coral Pink
Sand Dunes tiger beetle provides sufficient conservation measures to
reduce threats to the species.
You may submit your comments and materials concerning our proposed
rule or the associated DEA and draft EA by one of the methods listed in
ADDRESSES.
If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment--including your personal identifying information--will be
posted on the Web site. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes
[[Page 26310]]
personal identifying information, you may request at the top of your
document that we withhold this information from public review. However,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing this proposed rule, DEA, and Draft
EA, will be available for public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2012-0053 and Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020, or by appointment, during normal business hours,
at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Utah Ecological Services Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). You may obtain copies of the
proposed critical habitat, the DEA, the Conservation Agreement
amendment, and the Draft EA on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2012-0053 and Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020, or at https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/invertebrates/CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/, or by mail from
the Utah Ecological Services Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Background
Previous Federal Actions
It is our intent to discuss only those topics directly relevant to
the proposed designation of critical habitat for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle and our consideration of the Conservation Agreement
amendment relative to the proposed listing rule. For more information
on previous Federal actions and the biology of the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle, refer to the proposed listing rule and proposed
designation of critical habitat published in the Federal Register on
October 2, 2012 (77 FR 60208), which is available online at https://www.regulations.gov (at Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2012-0053 or Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020).
In total, we proposed approximately 921 hectares (ha) (2,276 acres
(ac)) in Kane County, Utah, for designation as critical habitat in our
October 2, 2012, proposed rule. However, the 2012 Coral Pink Sand Dunes
tiger beetle surveys found beetle adults and larvae in habitat adjacent
to the proposed critical habitat area (Knisley and Gowan 2013, pp. 12-
13). Therefore, based on the availability of this new information, we
request that the public review this data and provide input on how it
might be considered for the designation of critical habitat (see 2012
Survey Information, below).
The original proposal had a 60-day public comment period, ending
November 16, 2012. We will publish in the Federal Register a final
listing decision and final critical habitat designation for the Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle on or before the statutory deadline of
October 2, 2013.
Section 3 of the Act defines critical habitat as the specific areas
within the geographical area occupied by the species, at the time it is
listed in accordance with the Act, on which are found those physical or
biological features essential to the conservation of the species and
that may require special management considerations or protection; and
specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species at
the time it is listed upon a determination that such areas are
essential for the conservation of the species. If the proposed rule is
made final, section 7 of the Act will prohibit destruction or adverse
modification of critical habitat by any activity funded, authorized, or
carried out by any Federal agency. Federal agencies proposing actions
that affect critical habitat must consult with us on the effects of
their proposed actions, under section 7(a)(2) of the Act.
Our October 2, 2012, proposed rule evaluated the 2009 Conservation
Agreement for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle. The 2009
Conservation Agreement resulted in the establishment of two
Conservation Areas that protect the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle
from off-road vehicle use. Based on new survey information, we have
worked with the State of Utah and Bureau of Land Management to amend
the 2009 Conservation Agreement and expand the protected habitats for
the species (see Conservation Agreement Amendment, below). We are
seeking public comment on this amendment, including whether it provides
sufficient conservation measures to reduce threats to the species to
the point it does not meet the definition of threatened or endangered
under the Act.
Consideration of Impacts Under Section 4(b)(2) of the Act
Section 4(b)(2) of the Act requires that we designate or revise
critical habitat based upon the best scientific data available, after
taking into consideration the economic impact, impact on national
security, or any other relevant impact of specifying any particular
area as critical habitat. We may exclude an area from critical habitat
if we determine that the benefits of excluding the area outweigh the
benefits of including the area as critical habitat, provided such
exclusion will not result in the extinction of the species.
When considering the benefits of inclusion for an area, we consider
the additional regulatory benefits that the area would receive from the
protection from adverse modification or destruction as a result of
actions with a Federal nexus (activities conducted, funded, permitted,
or authorized by Federal agencies), the educational benefits of mapping
areas containing essential features that aid in the recovery of the
listed species, and any benefits that may result from the designation
due to State or Federal laws that may apply to critical habitat.
When considering the benefits of exclusion, we consider, among
other things, whether exclusion of a specific area is likely to result
in conservation; the continuation, strengthening, or encouragement of
partnerships; or implementation of a management plan.
In the case of the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle, the benefits
of critical habitat designation include public awareness of the
presence of these species and the importance of habitat protection,
and, where a Federal action exists, increased habitat protection for
these species due to protection from adverse modification or
destruction of critical habitat. In practice, situations with a Federal
action occur primarily on Federal lands or for projects implemented,
funded, or permitted by Federal agencies.
The final decision on whether to exclude any areas will be based on
the best scientific data available at the time of the final
designation, including information obtained during the comment period
and information about the economic impact of designation. Accordingly,
we have prepared a DEA concerning the economic effects of the proposed
critical habitat designation, which is available for review and comment
(see ADDRESSES).
Draft Economic Analysis
The purpose of the DEA is to identify and analyze the potential
economic impacts associated with the proposed critical habitat
designation for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle. The DEA also
describes the economic impacts of all potential conservation efforts
for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle. Some of these costs will
likely be incurred regardless of whether or not we designate critical
habitat.
The economic impact of the proposed critical habitat designation is
analyzed by comparing scenarios both ``with critical habitat'' and
``without critical habitat.'' The ``without critical habitat'' scenario
represents the baseline for the
[[Page 26311]]
analysis, considering protections already in place for the species
(e.g., under the Federal listing and other Federal, State, and local
regulations). Therefore, the baseline represents the costs incurred
regardless of whether critical habitat is designated. The ``with
critical habitat'' scenario describes the incremental impacts
associated specifically with the designation of critical habitat for
the species. The incremental conservation efforts and associated
impacts are those not expected to occur absent the designation of
critical habitat for the species. In other words, the incremental costs
are those attributable solely to the designation of critical habitat
above and beyond the baseline costs; these are the costs we may
consider in the final designation of critical habitat. The analysis
looks at baseline impacts incurred as a result of the species listing,
and forecasts both baseline and incremental impacts likely to occur if
we finalize the proposed critical habitat designation.
In light of the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling in New
Mexico Cattle Growers Association v. United States Fish and Wildlife
Service, the DEA also considers the coextensive cost impacts of the
critical habitat's protection. Coextensive impacts include the baseline
impacts, which are a result of the listing, and incremental impacts,
which are solely attributable to the designation of critical habitat.
The DEA provides estimated costs of the foreseeable potential
economic impacts of the proposed critical habitat designation for the
Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle over the next 20 years, which was
determined to be the appropriate period for analysis because planning
information was available for most activities to reasonably forecast
activity levels for projects for a 20-year timeframe. The DEA
identifies potential incremental costs as a result of the proposed
critical habitat designation; these are the costs attributed to
critical habitat over and above those baseline costs attributed to
listing. The DEA quantifies economic impacts of conservation efforts
for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle associated with the
following categories of activity: (1) Bureau of Land Management Kanab
Field Office Resource Management Plan administration; (2) off-road
vehicle (ORV) related consumer surplus losses (i.e., economic measure
of consumer satisfaction--ORV restrictions might result in some
consumers feeling like they were not receiving sufficient recreational
enjoyment for the expenses of traveling to and staying in the area);
(3) consultation on a Coral Pink Sand Dunes State Park incidental take
permit; (4) other management activities; and (5) conservation
activities.
The proposed critical habitat designation for the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle will result in minimal incremental costs because the
proposed critical habitat is occupied by the species or likely used as
a dispersal corridor between occupied habitats and we would expect
costs beyond those attributable to the species listing (baseline costs)
to be minimal (see discussion below). Furthermore, the baseline
protections afforded by existing conservation activities partially
address ORV use, which is one of the primary threats to the species and
its habitat (77 FR 60208). Table 1 summarizes the coextensive economic
impacts of the proposed listing and critical habitat.
Coextensive impacts to economic activities are anticipated to be
associated primarily with the administrative costs of Section 7
consultations, development of incidental take permits, and consumer
surplus losses from anticipated ORV restrictions in the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes State Park. The cost of these impacts is estimated to be
approximately $225,298 over the next 20 years, at an annualized cost of
$13,416. Costs associated with conservation activities that are
indirectly attributable to the listing are projected to be $538,441
(Table 1). In addition, ORV visitors to BLM land adjacent to the State
Park would potentially lose consumer surplus, but these costs are
unquantified because of a lack of reliable visitation data. Additional
information can be found in the DEA, which is available at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020 and at https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/invertebrates/CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/.
Table 1--Summary of Coextensive Impacts to Economic Activities Over the Next 20 Years (Including a 7 Percent Discount Rate) Pertaining to Critical
Habitat Designation for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger Beetle
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economic activities
----------------------------------------------------------------
OHV-Related State park Other Conservation Total
Reinitiation consumer incidental management activities coextensive
of BLM RMP surplus losses take permit activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Undiscounted............................................ $29,655 $275,698 $2,263 $73,000 $950,000 $1,330,616
Net Present Vaule @ 7%.................................. 25,400 156,260 a 2,263 41,375 538,441 763,738
Average Annual Discounted Cost.......................... 1,270 7,813 a 2,263 2,069 26,922 40,337
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Undiscounted because the action is expected to take place in 2013.
Incremental costs associated with the designation of critical
habitat are expected to be minimal. Designation of critical habitat for
the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle is not likely to result in
additional consultations since the proposed designated critical habitat
unit is occupied. Therefore, actions that would affect critical habitat
would also affect the species present in the occupied Unit of critical
habitat. However, the designation of critical habitat would result in
direct incremental administrative costs to address adverse modification
analyses, although these would be minimal. With no critical habitat
designated outside the Coral Pink Sand Dunes habitat range, all
indirect conservation costs or benefits are considered part of the
baseline. No additional project modifications are expected relative to
the baseline. Costs associated with reinitiating consultations will
also be considered part of the baseline.
We are seeking data and comments from the public on the DEA. We may
revise the proposed rule or supporting documents to incorporate or
address information we receive during the public comment period. In
particular, we may exclude an area from critical habitat if we
determine that the benefits of excluding the area outweigh the benefits
of including the area, provided
[[Page 26312]]
the exclusion will not result in the extinction of the species.
Draft Environmental Assessment; National Environmental Policy Act
When the range of a species includes States within the U.S. Tenth
Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to the ruling in Catron County Board
of Commissioners v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 75 F .3d 1429 (10th
Cir. 1996), we will complete an analysis under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (NEPA) on
critical habitat designations. The range of Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger
beetle is entirely within the State of Utah, which is within the Tenth
Circuit.
The Draft EA presents the purpose of and need for critical habitat
designation, the proposed action and alternatives, and an evaluation of
the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the alternatives under
the requirements of NEPA as implemented by the Council on Environmental
Quality regulations (40 CFR 1500 through 1518) and according to the
Department of the Interior's NEPA procedures.
The Draft EA will be used by the Service to decide whether or not
critical habitat will be designated as proposed; if the proposed action
requires refinement, or if another alternative is appropriate; or if
further analyses are needed through preparation of an environmental
impact statement. If the proposed action is selected as described (or
is changed minimally) and no further environmental analyses are needed,
then a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) would be the
appropriate conclusion of this process. A FONSI would then be prepared
for the environmental assessment. We are seeking data and comments from
the public on the draft EA, which is available at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020 and at https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/invertebrates/CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/.
2012 Survey Information
A survey for Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle was conducted south
of Conservation Area A in 2012, and we request that the public review
this data and provide input on how it is considered for the designation
of critical habitat (Knisley and Gowan 2013, entire). Researchers found
a total of 16 adults and 13 larvae singly or in small numbers
throughout the area directly south of Conservation Area A (Knisley and
Gowan 2013, pp. 12-13). Large numbers of adult tiger beetles were also
found in this area in earlier years (1998-2000) (Knisley and Gowan
2013, pp. 12-13), but this area was not included in our October 2,
2012, proposed critical habitat designation because beetles were
generally not observed there for a decade. As described in our October
2, 2012, proposed rule, the area supports the following primary
constituent elements: (1) Elevations from 5,610 to 6,857 feet (1,710 to
2,090 meters); (2) appropriate levels of moisture and compaction to
allow for burrowing (greater than 3 percent); and (3) vegetative cover
of 23-57 percent that allows for ovipositing, adult thermoregulation,
and abundant prey (77 FR 60208). Portions of this area are also
included in the Conservation Agreement amendment (see Conservation
Agreement Amendment, below). We seek comments from the public on the
survey results, which are available at https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2013-0020 and at https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/invertebrates/CoralPinkSandDunesTigerBeetle/.
Conservation Agreement Amendment
Initially formalized in 1997 (Conservation Committee 1997, entire),
and revised in 2009 (Conservation Committee 2009, entire), the
Conservation Agreement for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger Beetle is a
partnership for the development and implementation of conservation
measures to protect the tiger beetle and its habitat. The purpose of
the partnership is to ensure the long-term persistence of the Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle within its historical range and provide a
framework for future conservation efforts. The Utah Department of
Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Kane County,
Utah, are signatories to these agreements and comprise the conservation
committee. The conservation committee has implemented conservation
actions to benefit the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle and its
habitat, monitored their effectiveness, and adapted strategies as new
information became available. Coordination under the Conservation
Agreement resulted in the establishment of two Conservation Areas that
protect the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle from ORV use--
Conservation Areas A and B (see our proposed rule (77 FR 60208, October
2, 2012) for more information on these Conservation Areas).
On March 21, 2013, signatories to the Conservation Agreement signed
an amendment (Amendment to the 2009 Conservation Agreement and Strategy
for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger Beetle (Cicindela albissima))
(Conservation Committee 2013, entire) to the 2009 Conservation
Agreement that outlines several new conservation actions that will be
enacted to address the threats that were identified in the October 2,
2012, proposed rule (77 FR 60208). The amendment evaluates the most
recent tiger beetle survey information (Knisley and Gowan 2013, entire;
see 2012 Survey Information, above) and concludes that modifications to
the boundaries of the Conservation Areas are needed to ensure continued
protection of the tiger beetle from ongoing threats (see below
description of threats). The amendment enlarges Conservation Area A by
29 percent from 84 to 108 ha (207 to 266 ac). The expansion of
Conservation Area A protects 88 percent of the species' population from
ORV use. In addition, the amendment provides protection for islands of
habitat between Conservation Areas A and B (an additional 106 ha (263
ac)), with the intent of providing dispersal habitat for the species.
Overall, the Conservation Agreement amendment addresses the
following threats to the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle: (1)
Habitat loss and degradation caused by off-road vehicle use; (2) small
population effects, such as vulnerability to random chance events; (3)
the effects of climate change and drought; and (4) cumulative
interaction of individual factors such as off-road vehicle use, climate
change, and drought (77 FR 60208, October 2, 2012) (Table 3).
Additional information can be found in the Conservation Agreement
amendment, which can be obtained as specified at the beginning of this
document (see ADDRESSES: Document Availability).
[[Page 26313]]
Table 2--Threats to the Coral Pink Sand Dunes Tiger Beetle as Identified
in the October 2, 2012, Proposed Listing Decision and Proposed
Designation of Critical Habitat, and Planned Actions to Address Those
Threats Through the Conservation Agreement and Strategy Amendment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threat Planned action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Habitat loss/degradation and Utah Department of Natural
mortality associated with ORV use. Resources, Division of Parks and
Recreation agrees to expand the
boundary of Conservation Area A to
protect additional habitat while
addressing diversity in recreation
and maintaining safety standards
for dune visitors. This area will
be expanded in the 2013 field
season from 84 to 108 ha (207 to
266 ac), thus increasing protection
of tiger beetle occupied swales
from 48 percent to 88 percent. All
new or expanded habitat areas will
be demarcated with carsonite
marking posts to facilitate
compliance by Park visitors.
Utah Department of Natural
Resources, Division of Parks and
Recreation and the BLM will protect
vegetated habitat islands of
connectivity between the southern
and northern conservation areas and
monitor to ensure compliance. This
action will occur in 2013 and will
protect 106 ha (263 ac) of
additional sand dune habitat
comprising 14 individual habitat
patches, which range in size from 1
to 15 ha (2.6 to 37 ac). All new or
expanded habitat areas will be
demarcated with carsonite marking
posts to facilitate compliance by
Park visitors.
Tiger beetle adults and
larvae were found to the south of
Conservation Area A in 2012. The
conservation committee will visit
this area in spring of 2013 to
determine any additional habitats
that should be protected to support
the tiger beetle. The size and
configuration of any protected
areas will be determined during the
2013 field season with input from
all members of the conservation
committee. All new or expanded
habitat areas will be demarcated
with carsonite posts to facilitate
compliance by Park visitors.
The conservation committee
will analyze available historic
aerial imagery and other data to
better understand dune movement and
associated vegetation changes as
they relate to beetle occupation
and suitable habitat over time.
Knowledge of dune movement patterns
will be used in adaptive management
planning to accommodate dune
changes and the need to alter
conservation area boundaries.
The conservation committee
will conduct experimental
vegetation treatments within
existing conservation areas to
determine if this activity could be
an effective mechanism to increase
suitable habitat.
The conservation committee
will revisit conservation area
boundaries on a routine cycle
(every 3 years) and make necessary
adjustments as a result of shifting
dunes, vegetation changes,
population increases and decreases,
and resulting changes to suitable
habitat.
Utah Department of Natural
Resources, Division of Parks and
Recreation and the BLM will
continue efforts in law
enforcement, education, and
outreach.
Vulnerability to stochastic events We are not aware of any
due to small population size. additional populations of Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetles
outside of the Coral Pink Sand
Dunes geologic feature. However,
the conservation committee believes
it is appropriate to continue
surveys for the species and
suitable habitat in the area. The
conservation committee will
identify potential habitat within
an 80-km (50-mi) radius of the
Coral Pink Sand Dunes using aerial
imagery, and survey for tiger
beetle presence and habitat
suitability. If appropriate habitat
is found, the area will be
considered for experimental
introduction.
The conservation committee
will increase research efforts in
experimental translocations in
Conservation Area B and evaluate
new habitat islands for
appropriateness for reintroduction
efforts.
The conservation committee
will introduce individuals into
suitable habitats (potential sites
have been identified), monitor
these sites, and revise
translocation activities via an
adaptive management process.
Inadequacy of existing regulatory The Utah Department of
mechanisms. Natural Resources, Division of
Parks and Recreation and the BLM
have done a creditable job of
enforcing the protection boundaries
of Conservation Areas A and B for
approximately the last 15 years.
This amendment increases the size
of Conservation Area A by 24 ha (59
ac), and the conservation committee
will consider further protection of
habitats to the south of
Conservation Area A (see Habitat
loss/degradation and mortality
associated with ORV use, above). In
addition, the amendment establishes
14 habitat patches to support
dispersal of tiger beetles between
Conservation Areas A and B,
increasing the total protected area
by an additional 106 ha (263 ac).
Because these signatory agencies
have complied with the Conservation
Agreement and Strategy for the last
15 years, we can reasonably
conclude that the BLM and Utah
Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Parks and Recreation
will continue to properly enforce
the boundaries of all protected
areas.
Climate change and drought........ The BLM is installing a
weather station onsite in spring
2013 to better correlate weather
patterns with beetle abundance.
Understanding the effects of
weather patterns on Coral Pink Sand
Dunes tiger beetle populations may
help us develop adaptive management
strategies by identifying important
habitat use areas during
particularly warm or dry years.
The establishment of 14
additional habitat patches totaling
106 ha (263 ac) will occur at
higher elevations in the sand dune
area, and at locations that provide
significant vegetated habitat. This
effort has the potential to offset
the drying and warming effects of
climate change and drought on Coral
Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle
habitat. In addition these habitat
patches will provide dispersal
habitat and connectivity between
Conservation Areas A and B, which
will better allow the tiger beetle
to disperse to potentially cooler
and wetter habitat that occurs in
Conservation Area B.
Cumulative effects of the above... Addressing the threats
listed above independently will
prevent these threats from acting
cumulatively.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Required Determinations--Amended
In our October 2, 2012, proposed rule (77 FR 60208), we indicated
that we would defer our determination of compliance with several
statutes and Executive Orders (EOs) until the information concerning
potential economic impacts of the designation and potential effects on
landowners and stakeholders became available in the DEA. We have now
made use of the DEA data in making these determinations. In this
document, we affirm the information in our proposed rule concerning
E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O. 12630 (Takings), E.O.
13132 (Federalism), E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform), the Paperwork
Reduction Act, E.O. 12866 and E.O. 12988 (Clarity of the Rule), and the
President's memorandum of April 29, 1994, ``Government-to-Government
Relations with Native American Tribal Governments'' (59 FR 22951).
However, based on the DEA data, we are amending our required
determinations concerning the Regulatory Flexibility
[[Page 26314]]
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996), whenever an agency must publish a notice of rulemaking for any
proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for public
comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effects of
the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small government jurisdictions). However, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of the agency
certifies the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Based on our DEA of the proposed
designation, we provide our analysis for determining whether the
proposed rule would result in a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Based on comments we receive, we
may revise this determination as part of our final rulemaking.
According to the Small Business Administration, small entities
include small organizations, such as independent nonprofit
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions, including school
boards and city and town governments that serve fewer than 50,000
residents, as well as small businesses (13 CFR 121.201). Small
businesses include manufacturing and mining concerns with fewer than
500 employees, wholesale trade entities with fewer than 100 employees,
retail and service businesses with less than $5 million in annual
sales, general and heavy construction businesses with less than $27.5
million in annual business, special trade contractors doing less than
$11.5 million in annual business, and agricultural businesses with
annual sales less than $750,000. To determine if potential economic
impacts to these small entities are significant, we considered the
types of activities that might trigger regulatory impacts under the
rule, as well as the types of project modifications that may result. In
general, the term ``significant economic impact'' is meant to apply to
a typical small business firm's business operations.
A significant economic impact threshold is generally a 3 percent
impact as measured by appropriate quantitative metrics, such as
annualized cost of compliance as a percentage of sales, government
revenue, or annual operating expenditures. In general, if more than 20
percent of the affected small entities experience a significant
economic impact, then there is considered to be a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities, and a regulatory flexibility
analysis must be prepared.
For there to be a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities associated with designating critical habitat, then the
incremental direct compliance costs must exceed the 3 percent threshold
for more than 20 percent of the affected small entities. Since the
Service, BLM, and Coral Pink Sand Dunes State Park are the only
entities with expected direct compliance costs and are not considered
small entities, this rule will not result in a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
However, small entities, such as Kane County, ORV tour and rental
businesses, and other local tourism-related businesses, may be
indirectly affected as a result of the proposed listing and critical
habitat designation. Because motorized visitors to the dunes may be
further restricted access in the dune area than under the current
boundaries, ORV use and rentals may be displaced or reduced, impacting
the ORV rental entities and any businesses the visitors might frequent
as part of their overall trip.
Executive Order 13211--Energy Supply, Distribution, and Use
E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use, requires agencies to
prepare Statements of Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions.
The Office of Management and Budget's guidance for implementing this
Executive order outlines nine outcomes that may constitute ``a
significant adverse effect'' when compared to no regulatory action.
Critical habitat designation for Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle is
not anticipated to affect energy supply, distribution, and use.
Therefore, designation of critical habitat is not expected to lead to
any adverse outcomes (such as a reduction in oil and natural gas
production or distribution), and a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.), we make the following findings:
(a) This rule will not produce a Federal mandate. In general, a
Federal mandate is a provision in legislation, statute, or regulation
that would impose an enforceable duty upon State, local, or Tribal
governments, or the private sector, and includes both ``Federal
intergovernmental mandates'' and ``Federal private sector mandates.''
These terms are defined in 2 U.S.C. 658(5)-(7). ``Federal
intergovernmental mandate'' includes a regulation that ``would impose
an enforceable duty upon State, local, or Tribal governments,'' with
two exceptions. First, it excludes ``a condition of federal
assistance.'' Second, it excludes ``a duty arising from participation
in a voluntary Federal program,'' unless the regulation ``relates to a
then-existing Federal program under which $500,000,000 or more is
provided annually to State, local, and Tribal governments under
entitlement authority,'' if the provision would ``increase the
stringency of conditions of assistance'' or ``place caps upon, or
otherwise decrease, the Federal Government's responsibility to provide
funding'' and the State, local, or Tribal governments ``lack
authority'' to adjust accordingly. At the time of enactment, these
entitlement programs were: Medicaid; Aid to Families with Dependent
Children work programs; Child Nutrition; Food Stamps; Social Services
Block Grants; Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants; Foster Care,
Adoption Assistance, and Independent Living; Family Support Welfare
Services; and Child Support Enforcement. ``Federal private sector
mandate'' includes a regulation that ``would impose an enforceable duty
upon the private sector, except (i) a condition of Federal assistance;
or (ii) a duty arising from participation in a voluntary Federal
program.''
The designation of critical habitat does not impose a legally
binding duty on non-Federal government entities or private parties.
Under the Act, the only regulatory effect is that Federal agencies must
ensure that their actions do not destroy or adversely modify critical
habitat under section 7. While non-Federal entities that receive
Federal funding, assistance, or permits, or that otherwise require
approval or authorization from a Federal agency for an action, may be
indirectly impacted by the designation of critical habitat, the legally
binding duty to avoid destruction or adverse modification of critical
habitat rests squarely on the Federal agency. Furthermore, to the
extent that non-Federal entities are indirectly impacted because they
receive Federal assistance or participate in a voluntary Federal aid
program, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act would not apply, nor would
critical habitat
[[Page 26315]]
shift the costs of the large entitlement programs listed above on to
State governments.
(b) As discussed in the DEA of the proposed designation of critical
habitat for Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle, we do not believe that
the rule would significantly or uniquely affect small governments
because it would not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year; that is, it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. The DEA concludes that
incremental impacts may occur due to project modifications and
administrative costs of consultation that may need to be made for
grazing, maintenance, and recreational activities; however, these are
not expected to affect small governments to the extent described above.
Consequently, we do not believe that the proposed critical habitat
designation would significantly or uniquely affect small government
entities. As such, a Small Government Agency Plan is not required.
References Cited
A complete list of all references we cited in the proposed rule and
in this document is available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or by contacting the Utah Ecological Services
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this document are the staff members of the
Utah Ecological Services Office.
Dated: April 26, 2013.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013-10568 Filed 5-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
