Klamath National Forest, California, Jess Project, 26317-26318 [2013-10489]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Notices through inspection, that they are generally pest free, and based on our determination that the restrictions in the Federal Order are sufficient to mitigate the risk associated with the quarantine pest in question. Generally, we would consider the importation from a country of 10 or more plants in each of the last 3 fiscal years to constitute significant trade in that taxon. However, we will also consider other data showing that there is significant trade in a taxon, even if it does not meet this standard. After reviewing any comments we receive, we will announce our decision regarding the addition of the taxa described in the data sheets to the NAPPRA lists in a subsequent notice. If the Administrator’s determination that the taxa are quarantine pests or hosts of quarantine pests remains unchanged following our consideration of the comments, then we will add the taxa described in the data sheets to the appropriate NAPPRA list. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450 and 7701–7772 and 7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. Done in Washington, DC, this 30th day of April 2013. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2013–10656 Filed 5–3–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Klamath National Forest, California, Jess Project Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. AGENCY: ACTION: The Klamath National Forest will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to document and publicly disclose the environmental effects of fuels treatments on ridge tops and along roadways, thinning in natural stands and plantations, and meadow treatments to improve ecosystem function and resiliency while contributing to rural economic health. The project area is south of Sawyers Bar, California. Treatments are proposed on approximately 1,950 acres. DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by June 20, 2013. The draft environmental impact statement is expected November 2013 and the final environmental impact statement is expected January 2014. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:06 May 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 Send written comments to Klamath National Forest Headquarters, ATTN: Angie Bell, Project Leader, 1711 S. Main Street, Yreka, CA 96097. Electronic comments can be made at the project’s Web page: https://www.fs.fed. us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project= 38943, or via facsimile to (530) 841– 4571. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angie Bell, 530–842–6131, or Patty Grantham, Forest Supervisor, 530–842– 6131. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose and Need for Action The Jess project was developed to improve ecosystem function and resiliency while contributing to rural economic health. A Forest Service interdisciplinary team (IDT), composed of specialists from a wide array of disciplines in collaboration with interested parties, developed a purpose and need. The collaboration efforts included several public meetings and a field trip to discuss the need for change and potential actions in the project area. The IDT identified the following purpose and need for this project by comparing the existing conditions in the project area with the desired conditions described in the Forest Plan, LateSuccessional Reserve Assessments, the North Fork Salmon Watershed Assessment and the Sawyers Bar Wildfire Community Protection Plan: • Manage fuel loadings to reduce the risk of wildfires affecting nearby communities. • Improve compositional, structural, and functional attributes of biologically diverse forest ecosystems by restoring ecological processes that build resiliency to high-intensity wildfire and insect and disease. • Provide a broad range of ecosystem services, including wood products, rural economic health, biodiversity, and the beneficial uses of water. Proposed Action The IDT, in conjunction with the informal collaborative group composed of local, interested parties, inventoried the project area to identify resource concerns and develop management activities (proposed actions) to achieve the purpose and need for the Jess Project. The following proposed actions have been identified to move the project area from the existing condition to the PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26317 desired condition. Project design features (PDFs) and best management practices (BMPs) are incorporated into this proposed action. The Forest Service proposes the following treatments on about 1,950 acres within the 8,735 acre project boundary: • Commercially harvest about 810 acres, including natural stands and plantations, with about 120 acres proposed for skyline and 690 acres of ground-based yarding; • Treating fuels on strategic ridge tops on about 165 acres, including 95 acres of thinning, handpiling, and burning and 70 acres of mastication; • Reducing roadside fuels on about 615 acres over 15 miles of National Forest Transportation System (NFTS) roads; • Prescribed underburning about 250 acres; • Planting rust-resistant sugar pine on scattered acres throughout the project area; • Enhancing meadows around Mud Lake and other locations in the project area; and • Masticating and handpiling/burning brush on about 150 acres for stand health and big game habitat enhancement. Acres by treatment type do not account for the overlap in treatment types. Thinning treatments are likely to take place over the first five years after decision, followed by prescribed burning and pile burning in subsequent years. A more detailed description of this proposal, including access, is below. Commercial harvest of trees larger than 9 inches dbh will occur on over 800 acres. Commercial treatments will vary with species preference and would be driven by topographic location, amount of disease present, and desired regeneration species. Trees with greater than 20–50% of their crown infected with mistletoe, depending on unit, will be candidates for removal. Dominant and co-dominant trees with full crowns, despite mistletoe infection will be maintained in treatment units. Several units have groups of older trees that will be retained as islands to provide spatial variation. Some small openings will be increased to resemble more historic gap sizes of 1–21⁄2 acres. Hardwoods will be favored and will be thinned around in areas. Enhancement of hardwoods and reduction of conifer competition is prescribed in several units. Patches of saplings and pole size trees will be avoided during treatment. Overall, the best crowns will be maintained with crown spacing varying from five to twenty feet wide. Sugar pines proven to be rust-resistant from a local seed zone E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1 26318 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 87 / Monday, May 6, 2013 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES and appropriate elevation bands will be planted in newly created openings within areas of historical dominance. Small diameter (less than 9 inches diameter at breast height (dbh)) conifers in ridge top fuel treatments will be thinned, handpiled, and burned. Mastication will occur along strategic ridges between the handpiled areas to complete the ridge treatments. Roadside treatments will manually cut, handpile, and burn brush and small diameter trees (less than 6 inches dbh) within buffers about 100 feet wide on either side of the road. Actual treatment may vary in size and width depending on fuel conditions. Trees less than 10 inches dbh will be thinned to an average of 20-foot bole spacing. Existing brush densities will be reduced by 40–60% where they exist. All hazard trees will be identified and removed in accordance with danger tree guidelines. Roadside fuels treatments would complement treatments proposed by the local fire safe council. Pre-commercial treatments will thin small diameter conifers (less than 9 inches dbh) to approximately 28–30 foot bole spacing or a specified distance from trees of a certain diameter. For example, if a tree is four inches dbh, then spacing will be dbh times 12 plus 10 feet, equaling 14-foot bole spacing. There will be species specific preferences for thinning in some units. Meadow treatments will consist of manually removing small diameter conifers (less than 9 inches dbh). The removed trees will be handpiled and burned. Noxious weed will be removal using manual techniques. Willows may be planted in and around the meadows where needed to increase shade and bank stability. Three miles of existing roadbeds will be used as temporary roads for shortterm access and then closed following project completion to reduce log skidding distances and associated impacts to soils and other resources. No new temporary roads are proposed. Existing landings will be used to the extent possible. The estimated number of new landings needed for the project is 30, with a maximum size less than one-acre each. Responsible Official Patricia Grantham, Klamath National Forest Supervisor, 1711 South Main Street, Yreka, California 96097, will prepare and sign the Record of Decision at the conclusion of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:06 May 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 Nature of Decision To Be Made DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE The Forest Service is the lead agency for the project. Based on the result of the NEPA analysis, the Forest Supervisor’s Record of Decision regarding the Jess Project will recommend implementation of one of the following: (1) The proposed action and mitigation necessary to minimize or avoid adverse impacts; (2) An alternative to the proposed action and mitigation necessary to minimize or avoid adverse impacts; or (3) The no-action alternative. The Record of Decision will also document the consistency of the proposed action or one of the alternatives with the Klamath National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Scoping Process This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments should be as specific as possible. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however. Dated: April 25, 2013. Patricia A. Grantham, Klamath National Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2013–10489 Filed 5–3–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. Title: U.S. Census—Age Search. OMB Control Number: 0607–0117. Form Number(s): BC–600, BC–600SP, BC–649(L), BC–658(L). Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection. Burden Hours: 628. Number of Respondents: 2,799. Average Hours per Response: 11 minutes. Needs and Uses: The U.S. Census Bureau maintains the 1910–2010 Federal censuses for searching purposes. The purpose of the searching is to provide, upon request, transcripts of personal data from historical population census records. Information relating to age, place of birth, and citizenship is provided upon payment of the established fee to individuals for their use in qualifying for social security, old age benefits, retirement, court litigation, passports, insurance settlements, etc. The age and citizenship searching service is a self-supporting operation. Expenses incurred in providing census transcripts are covered by the fees paid by individuals requesting a search of the census records. The census records are confidential by an Act of Congress. The Census Bureau is prohibited by federal laws from disclosing any information contained in the records except upon written request from the person to whom the information pertains or to a legal representative. Affected Public: Individuals or households. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain benefits. Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Section 8a. OMB Desk Officer: Brian HarrisKojetin, (202) 395–7314. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at jjessup@doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 87 (Monday, May 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26317-26318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Klamath National Forest, California, Jess Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Klamath National Forest will prepare an environmental 
impact statement (EIS) to document and publicly disclose the 
environmental effects of fuels treatments on ridge tops and along 
roadways, thinning in natural stands and plantations, and meadow 
treatments to improve ecosystem function and resiliency while 
contributing to rural economic health. The project area is south of 
Sawyers Bar, California. Treatments are proposed on approximately 1,950 
acres.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by June 20, 2013. The draft environmental impact statement is expected 
November 2013 and the final environmental impact statement is expected 
January 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Klamath National Forest 
Headquarters, ATTN: Angie Bell, Project Leader, 1711 S. Main Street, 
Yreka, CA 96097. Electronic comments can be made at the project's Web 
page: https://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=38943, 
or via facsimile to (530) 841-4571.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angie Bell, 530-842-6131, or Patty 
Grantham, Forest Supervisor, 530-842-6131.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose and Need for Action

    The Jess project was developed to improve ecosystem function and 
resiliency while contributing to rural economic health. A Forest 
Service interdisciplinary team (IDT), composed of specialists from a 
wide array of disciplines in collaboration with interested parties, 
developed a purpose and need. The collaboration efforts included 
several public meetings and a field trip to discuss the need for change 
and potential actions in the project area. The IDT identified the 
following purpose and need for this project by comparing the existing 
conditions in the project area with the desired conditions described in 
the Forest Plan, Late-Successional Reserve Assessments, the North Fork 
Salmon Watershed Assessment and the Sawyers Bar Wildfire Community 
Protection Plan:
     Manage fuel loadings to reduce the risk of wildfires 
affecting nearby communities.
     Improve compositional, structural, and functional 
attributes of biologically diverse forest ecosystems by restoring 
ecological processes that build resiliency to high-intensity wildfire 
and insect and disease.
     Provide a broad range of ecosystem services, including 
wood products, rural economic health, biodiversity, and the beneficial 
uses of water.

Proposed Action

    The IDT, in conjunction with the informal collaborative group 
composed of local, interested parties, inventoried the project area to 
identify resource concerns and develop management activities (proposed 
actions) to achieve the purpose and need for the Jess Project. The 
following proposed actions have been identified to move the project 
area from the existing condition to the desired condition. Project 
design features (PDFs) and best management practices (BMPs) are 
incorporated into this proposed action. The Forest Service proposes the 
following treatments on about 1,950 acres within the 8,735 acre project 
boundary:
     Commercially harvest about 810 acres, including natural 
stands and plantations, with about 120 acres proposed for skyline and 
690 acres of ground-based yarding;
     Treating fuels on strategic ridge tops on about 165 acres, 
including 95 acres of thinning, handpiling, and burning and 70 acres of 
mastication;
     Reducing roadside fuels on about 615 acres over 15 miles 
of National Forest Transportation System (NFTS) roads;
     Prescribed underburning about 250 acres;
     Planting rust-resistant sugar pine on scattered acres 
throughout the project area;
     Enhancing meadows around Mud Lake and other locations in 
the project area; and
     Masticating and handpiling/burning brush on about 150 
acres for stand health and big game habitat enhancement.
    Acres by treatment type do not account for the overlap in treatment 
types. Thinning treatments are likely to take place over the first five 
years after decision, followed by prescribed burning and pile burning 
in subsequent years. A more detailed description of this proposal, 
including access, is below.
    Commercial harvest of trees larger than 9 inches dbh will occur on 
over 800 acres. Commercial treatments will vary with species preference 
and would be driven by topographic location, amount of disease present, 
and desired regeneration species. Trees with greater than 20-50% of 
their crown infected with mistletoe, depending on unit, will be 
candidates for removal. Dominant and co-dominant trees with full 
crowns, despite mistletoe infection will be maintained in treatment 
units. Several units have groups of older trees that will be retained 
as islands to provide spatial variation. Some small openings will be 
increased to resemble more historic gap sizes of 1-2\1/2\ acres. 
Hardwoods will be favored and will be thinned around in areas. 
Enhancement of hardwoods and reduction of conifer competition is 
prescribed in several units. Patches of saplings and pole size trees 
will be avoided during treatment. Overall, the best crowns will be 
maintained with crown spacing varying from five to twenty feet wide. 
Sugar pines proven to be rust-resistant from a local seed zone

[[Page 26318]]

and appropriate elevation bands will be planted in newly created 
openings within areas of historical dominance.
    Small diameter (less than 9 inches diameter at breast height (dbh)) 
conifers in ridge top fuel treatments will be thinned, handpiled, and 
burned. Mastication will occur along strategic ridges between the 
handpiled areas to complete the ridge treatments.
    Roadside treatments will manually cut, handpile, and burn brush and 
small diameter trees (less than 6 inches dbh) within buffers about 100 
feet wide on either side of the road. Actual treatment may vary in size 
and width depending on fuel conditions. Trees less than 10 inches dbh 
will be thinned to an average of 20-foot bole spacing. Existing brush 
densities will be reduced by 40-60% where they exist. All hazard trees 
will be identified and removed in accordance with danger tree 
guidelines. Roadside fuels treatments would complement treatments 
proposed by the local fire safe council.
    Pre-commercial treatments will thin small diameter conifers (less 
than 9 inches dbh) to approximately 28-30 foot bole spacing or a 
specified distance from trees of a certain diameter. For example, if a 
tree is four inches dbh, then spacing will be dbh times 12 plus 10 
feet, equaling 14-foot bole spacing. There will be species specific 
preferences for thinning in some units.
    Meadow treatments will consist of manually removing small diameter 
conifers (less than 9 inches dbh). The removed trees will be handpiled 
and burned. Noxious weed will be removal using manual techniques. 
Willows may be planted in and around the meadows where needed to 
increase shade and bank stability.
    Three miles of existing roadbeds will be used as temporary roads 
for short-term access and then closed following project completion to 
reduce log skidding distances and associated impacts to soils and other 
resources. No new temporary roads are proposed. Existing landings will 
be used to the extent possible. The estimated number of new landings 
needed for the project is 30, with a maximum size less than one-acre 
each.

Responsible Official

    Patricia Grantham, Klamath National Forest Supervisor, 1711 South 
Main Street, Yreka, California 96097, will prepare and sign the Record 
of Decision at the conclusion of the National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA) review.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The Forest Service is the lead agency for the project. Based on the 
result of the NEPA analysis, the Forest Supervisor's Record of Decision 
regarding the Jess Project will recommend implementation of one of the 
following: (1) The proposed action and mitigation necessary to minimize 
or avoid adverse impacts; (2) An alternative to the proposed action and 
mitigation necessary to minimize or avoid adverse impacts; or (3) The 
no-action alternative. The Record of Decision will also document the 
consistency of the proposed action or one of the alternatives with the 
Klamath National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides 
the development of the environmental impact statement. To assist the 
Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on 
the proposed action, comments should be as specific as possible.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of 
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of 
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record 
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be 
accepted and considered, however.

    Dated: April 25, 2013.
Patricia A. Grantham,
Klamath National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2013-10489 Filed 5-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.