Safety Zones; National Cherry Festival Air Show and Fireworks Display; West Grand Traverse Bay, Traverse City, MI, 25407-25410 [2013-09993]
Download as PDF
25407
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
September 15, 2012, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
part 71.1. The Class D and Class E
airspace designation listed in this
document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
The FAA has determined this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation (1)
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority for
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
modify controlled airspace at Twin Falls
Joslin Field-Magic Valley Regional
Airport, Twin Falls, ID.
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:09 Apr 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
Part 71 continues to read as follows:
ANM ID E5 Twin Falls, ID [Modified]
Twin Falls Joslin Field-Magic Valley
Regional Airport, ID
(Lat. 42°28′55″ N., long. 114°29′16″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within 10.5 miles north
and 6 miles south of the Twin Falls Joslin
Field-Magic Valley Regional Airport 086°
bearing extending 26.1 miles east, and within
4.3 miles each side of the airport 156° bearing
extending 8.3 miles southeast and within
10.3 miles north and 7.3 miles south of the
airport 281° bearing extending 20 miles west;
that airspace extending upward from 1,200
feet above the surface bounded by a line
beginning at lat. 43°22′00″ N., long.
115°08′00″ W.; to lat. 43°09′00″ N., long.
114°03′00″ W.; to lat. 42°33′00″ N., long.
114°03′00″ W.; to lat. 42°18′00″ N., long.
114°06′00″ W.; to lat. 41°48′00″ N., long.
115°00′00″ W.; to lat. 43°01′00″ N., long.
115°20′00″ W., thence to the point of
beginning.
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012 is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 5000
Class D airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM ID D Twin Falls, ID [Modified]
Twin Falls Joslin Field-Magic Valley
Regional Airport, ID
(Lat. 42°28′55″ N., long. 114°29′16″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 6,700 feet MSL
within a 4.3-mile radius of Twin Falls Joslin
Field-Magic Valley Regional Airport. This
Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated
as surface areas.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM ID E2 Twin Falls, ID [Modified]
Twin Falls Joslin Field-Magic Valley
Regional Airport, ID
(Lat. 42°28′55″ N., long. 114°29′16″ W.)
Within a 4.3-mile radius of Twin Falls Joslin
Field-Magic Valley Regional Airport. This
Class E airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace designated
as an extension to Class D surface area.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM ID E4 Twin Falls, ID [Modified]
Twin Falls Joslin Field-Magic Valley
Regional Airport, ID
(Lat. 42°28′55″ N., long. 114°29′16″ W.)
Twin Falls VORTAC
(Lat. 42°28′48″ N., long. 114°29′22″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface 4.2 miles south and 4.4 miles north
of the Twin Falls VORTAC 086° and 281°
radials extending from the 4.3-mile radius of
Twin Falls Joslin Field-Magic Valley
Regional Airport to 9.2 miles east and 9.2
miles west of the VORTAC. This Class E
airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time
will thereafter be continuously published in
the Airport/Facility Directory.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 11,
2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–10284 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0189]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; National Cherry Festival
Air Show and Fireworks Display; West
Grand Traverse Bay, Traverse City, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish safety zones in the Captain of
the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone. These
proposed safety zones are intended to
restrict vessels from certain portions of
water areas within Sector Sault Sainte
Marie Captain of the Port zone. These
temporary safety zones are necessary to
protect spectators and vessels from the
hazards associated with fireworks
displays and aircraft involved in an air
show.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
25408
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
2013–0189 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email MST1 Thomas Link,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard,
Sector Sault Sainte Marie, MI, telephone
(906) 253–2443, email
thomas.a.link@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2013–0189),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:09 Apr 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0189) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0189) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Background and Purpose
From June 28 to June 30, 2013, the
National Cherry Festival in Traverse
City, MI will host an air show over the
West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay. At the
conclusion of the National Cherry
Festival on July 6, 2013, fireworks will
be launched in Grand Traverse Bay. The
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie
has determined that the air show and
fireworks display pose various potential
hazards to the public, including
premature detonations, dangerous
projectiles, and falling or burning
debris.
With these potential hazards in mind,
the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie proposes to establish a temporary
safety zone pursuant to the authority
granted in the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act (33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.)
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
To safeguard against the dangers
posed by the National Cherry Festival
air show and fireworks display, the
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie
has determined that temporary safety
zones are necessary. Thus, the Captain
of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie proposes
to establish two safety zones for the air
show and fireworks display over the
West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay.
The proposed safety zone for the air
show will be established on June 28,
2013, until June 30, 2013, in a position
over West Grand Traverse Bay bounded
by a line drawn from 44°46′48″ N,
085°38′18″ W, then southeast to
44°46′30″ N, 085°35′30″ W, then
southwest to 44°46′00″ N, 085°35′48″ W,
then northwest to 44°46′18″ N,
085°38′18″ W, then back to the point of
origin.
This proposed safety zone will be
effective from 12 p.m. on June 28, 2013,
until 3 p.m. on June 30, 2013. This
proposed safety zone will be enforced
daily from 12 p.m. until 3 p.m.
A proposed safety zone will be
established on July 6, 2013, for the
National Cherry Festival Fireworks
display over West Grand Traverse Bay
within the arc of a circle with a 1000foot radius from the fireworks launch
site located on a barge in position
44°46′12″ N, 085°37′06″ W.
This proposed safety zone will be
effective and enforced from 10 p.m. to
11:30 p.m. on July 6, 2013.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the proposed safety zones is
prohibited unless authorized by the
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie,
or his on-scene representative. All
persons and vessels authorized to enter
the proposed safety zones shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated onscene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will
not interfere with other agencies, will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients, and will not
raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zones established by this
proposed rule will be relatively small
and enforced for a relatively short time.
Also, the safety zones are designed to
minimize their impacts on navigable
waters in that vessels may still transit
unrestricted portions of the waterways.
Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the
safety zones when permitted by the
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie.
On the whole, the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the enforcement of this proposed
rule.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
around West Grand Traverse Bay,
Traverse City, Michigan, between 12:30
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:09 Apr 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
p.m. and 3 p.m. on June 28 to June 30,
2013, and from 10 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on
July 6, 2013.
These proposed safety zones will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section
above.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact MST1
Thomas Link, Prevention Department,
Coast Guard Sector Sault Sainte Marie,
MI at (906) 253–2443. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25409
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity,and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
25410
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34) (g), of the
Commandant Instruction because it
involves the establishment of a safety
zone. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0189 to read as
follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.T09–0189 Safety Zone; National
Cherry Festival Air Show and Fireworks
Display, West Grand Traverse Bay, Traverse
City, MI.
(a) National Cherry Festival Fireworks
Display; Traverse City, MI:
(1) Location: All U.S. navigable waters
and adjacent shoreline of the West Arm
of Grand Traverse Bay within the arc of
a circle with a 1000-foot radius from the
fireworks launch site located on a barge
in position 44°46′12″ N, 085°37′06″ W
[DATUM: NAD 83].
(2) Effective and Enforcement Period:
This regulation will be enforced on July
6, 2013, from 10 p.m. until 11:30 p.m.
(b) National Cherry Festival Air Show;
Traverse City, MI:
(1) Location: All U.S. navigable waters
of the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay
bounded by a line drawn from 44°46′48″
N, 085°38′18″ W, then southeast to
44°46′30″ N, 085°35′30″ W, then
southwest to 44°46′00″ N, 085°35′48″ W,
then northwest to 44°46′30″ N,
085°38′30″ W, then back to the point of
origin [DATUM: NAD 83].
(2) Effective and Enforcement period.
This regulation will be enforced from 12
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:09 Apr 30, 2013
Jkt 229001
p.m. until 3 p.m. daily from June 28, to
June 30, 2013.
(i) The Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie may suspend enforcement
of the safety zones established under
this section.
(ii) the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie will notify the public of
the enforcement and suspension of
enforcement of the safety zones
established by this section via any
means listed in 33 CFR 165.7(a). The
primary method of notification,
however, will be through Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and local Notice to
Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by
the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte
Marie to monitor these safety zones,
permit entry into these safety zones,
give legally enforceable orders to
persons or vessels within these safety
zones, or take other actions authorized
by the Captain of the Port.
(2) Public vessel means a vessel
owned, chartered, or operated by the
United States or by a State or political
subdivision thereof.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations in 33 CFR
165.23 apply.
(2) All persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie or a designated
representative. Upon being hailed by the
U.S. Coast Guard by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(3) When the safety zones are
established by this section and are being
enforced, all vessels must obtain
permission from the Captain of the Port,
Sault Sainte Marie or his or her
designated representative to enter, move
within, or exit that safety zone. Vessels
and persons granted permission to enter
the safety zones shall obey all lawful
orders or directions of the Captain of the
Port or his or her designated
representative. While within the safety
zones, all vessels shall operate at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course.
(e) Exemption. Public vessels, as
defined in paragraph (c) of this section,
are exempt from the requirements in
this section.
Dated: April 4, 2013.
J.C. McGuiness,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2013–09993 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0192]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Tall Ship Safety Zones;
War of 1812 Bicentennial
Commemoration, Great Lakes
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone
around each tall ship participating in
the Tall Ships Challenge Great Lakes
2013 and the War of 1812 Bicentennial
Commemoration. These safety zones
will ensure the safety of participating
tall ships, spectator vessels, and
commercial traffic throughout the Great
Lakes.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0192 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this proposed
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Mark
Bobal, Prevention Department, Ninth
Coast Guard District, Cleveland, OH
telephone (216) 902–6052, email
mark.d.bobal@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 1, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25407-25410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09993]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0189]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; National Cherry Festival Air Show and Fireworks
Display; West Grand Traverse Bay, Traverse City, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish safety zones in the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone. These proposed safety
zones are intended to restrict vessels from certain portions of water
areas within Sector Sault Sainte Marie Captain of the Port zone. These
temporary safety zones are necessary to protect spectators and vessels
from the hazards associated with fireworks displays and aircraft
involved in an air show.
DATES: Comments and related materials must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
[[Page 25408]]
2013-0189 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email MST1 Thomas Link, Prevention Department, Coast
Guard, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, MI, telephone (906) 253-2443, email
thomas.a.link@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2013-0189), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when
you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by the
Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0189) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0189) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
B. Background and Purpose
From June 28 to June 30, 2013, the National Cherry Festival in
Traverse City, MI will host an air show over the West Arm of Grand
Traverse Bay. At the conclusion of the National Cherry Festival on July
6, 2013, fireworks will be launched in Grand Traverse Bay. The Captain
of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie has determined that the air show and
fireworks display pose various potential hazards to the public,
including premature detonations, dangerous projectiles, and falling or
burning debris.
With these potential hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie proposes to establish a temporary safety zone pursuant to
the authority granted in the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (33 U.S.C.
1221 et seq.)
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
To safeguard against the dangers posed by the National Cherry
Festival air show and fireworks display, the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie has determined that temporary safety zones are necessary.
Thus, the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie proposes to establish
two safety zones for the air show and fireworks display over the West
Arm of Grand Traverse Bay.
The proposed safety zone for the air show will be established on
June 28, 2013, until June 30, 2013, in a position over West Grand
Traverse Bay bounded by a line drawn from 44[deg]46'48'' N,
085[deg]38'18'' W, then southeast to 44[deg]46'30'' N, 085[deg]35'30''
W, then southwest to 44[deg]46'00'' N, 085[deg]35'48'' W, then
northwest to 44[deg]46'18'' N, 085[deg]38'18'' W, then back to the
point of origin.
This proposed safety zone will be effective from 12 p.m. on June
28, 2013, until 3 p.m. on June 30, 2013. This proposed safety zone will
be enforced daily from 12 p.m. until 3 p.m.
A proposed safety zone will be established on July 6, 2013, for the
National Cherry Festival Fireworks display over West Grand Traverse Bay
within the arc of a circle with a 1000-foot radius from the fireworks
launch site located on a barge in position 44[deg]46'12'' N,
085[deg]37'06'' W.
This proposed safety zone will be effective and enforced from 10
p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on July 6, 2013.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the proposed safety
zones is prohibited unless authorized by the
[[Page 25409]]
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie, or his on-scene
representative. All persons and vessels authorized to enter the
proposed safety zones shall comply with the instructions of the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene representative.
The Captain of the Port or his on-scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies,
will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients,
and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zones established by this proposed rule will be
relatively small and enforced for a relatively short time. Also, the
safety zones are designed to minimize their impacts on navigable waters
in that vessels may still transit unrestricted portions of the
waterways. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still
transit through the safety zones when permitted by the Captain of the
Port, Sault Sainte Marie. On the whole, the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the enforcement of this
proposed rule.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit around West Grand Traverse Bay, Traverse City,
Michigan, between 12:30 p.m. and 3 p.m. on June 28 to June 30, 2013,
and from 10 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on July 6, 2013.
These proposed safety zones will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the reasons
discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review section above.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact MST1 Thomas Link, Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Sault Sainte Marie, MI at (906) 253-2443. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity,and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
[[Page 25410]]
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34) (g), of the
Commandant Instruction because it involves the establishment of a
safety zone. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0189 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0189 Safety Zone; National Cherry Festival Air Show and
Fireworks Display, West Grand Traverse Bay, Traverse City, MI.
(a) National Cherry Festival Fireworks Display; Traverse City, MI:
(1) Location: All U.S. navigable waters and adjacent shoreline of
the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay within the arc of a circle with a
1000-foot radius from the fireworks launch site located on a barge in
position 44[deg]46'12'' N, 085[deg]37'06'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
(2) Effective and Enforcement Period: This regulation will be
enforced on July 6, 2013, from 10 p.m. until 11:30 p.m.
(b) National Cherry Festival Air Show; Traverse City, MI:
(1) Location: All U.S. navigable waters of the West Arm of Grand
Traverse Bay bounded by a line drawn from 44[deg]46'48'' N,
085[deg]38'18'' W, then southeast to 44[deg]46'30'' N, 085[deg]35'30''
W, then southwest to 44[deg]46'00'' N, 085[deg]35'48'' W, then
northwest to 44[deg]46'30'' N, 085[deg]38'30'' W, then back to the
point of origin [DATUM: NAD 83].
(2) Effective and Enforcement period. This regulation will be
enforced from 12 p.m. until 3 p.m. daily from June 28, to June 30,
2013.
(i) The Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie may suspend
enforcement of the safety zones established under this section.
(ii) the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie will notify the
public of the enforcement and suspension of enforcement of the safety
zones established by this section via any means listed in 33 CFR
165.7(a). The primary method of notification, however, will be through
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and local Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie to monitor these safety zones, permit entry into these
safety zones, give legally enforceable orders to persons or vessels
within these safety zones, or take other actions authorized by the
Captain of the Port.
(2) Public vessel means a vessel owned, chartered, or operated by
the United States or by a State or political subdivision thereof.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or a designated
representative. Upon being hailed by the U.S. Coast Guard by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
(3) When the safety zones are established by this section and are
being enforced, all vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his or her designated representative to
enter, move within, or exit that safety zone. Vessels and persons
granted permission to enter the safety zones shall obey all lawful
orders or directions of the Captain of the Port or his or her
designated representative. While within the safety zones, all vessels
shall operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
(e) Exemption. Public vessels, as defined in paragraph (c) of this
section, are exempt from the requirements in this section.
Dated: April 4, 2013.
J.C. McGuiness,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2013-09993 Filed 4-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P