Programmatic Environmental Assessment, 25297-25298 [2013-09898]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2013 / Notices
Varanidae
Applicant: Armando Bazaldua, Ventura,
CA; PRT–203351
The applicant requests renewal of
their captive-bred wildlife registration
under 50 CFR 17.21(g) for the radiated
tortoise (Astrochelys radiata) to enhance
their propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Applicant: Terry Shinn, Yukon, OK;
PRT–228672
The applicant requests renewal of
their captive-bred wildlife registration
under 50 CFR 17.21(g) for the radiated
tortoise (Astrochelys radiata) to enhance
their propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Applicant: David Hanson, Bend, OR;
PRT–701525
The applicant requests renewal of
their captive-bred wildlife registration
under 50 CFR 17.21(g) for Bengal tiger
(Panthera tigris tigris), leopard
(Panthera pardus) and snow leopard
(Uncia uncia) to enhance their
propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Applicant: Patterson Energy of Texas
LLC, Hondo, TX; PRT–71533A
The applicant requests amendment of
their captive-bred wildlife registration
under 50 CFR 17.21(g) to add the
Barasingha (Rucervus duvaucelii), Eld’s
deer (Rucervus eldii), Arabian oryx
(Oryx leucoryx), addax (Addax
nasomaculatus), dama gazelle (Nanger
dama), and red lechwe (Kobus leche) to
enhance the species’ propagation or
survival. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
Applicant: Patterson Energy of Texas
LLC, Hondo, TX; PRT–03577B
The applicant requests a permit
authorizing interstate and foreign
commerce, export, and cull of excess
scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah)
from the captive herd maintained at
their facility, for the purpose of
enhancement of the survival of the
species. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
Applicant: Tiemann Land and Cattle
Development Inc., Pflugerville, TX;
PRT–03591B
The applicant requests a captive-bred
wildlife registration under 50 CFR
17.21(g) for the barasingha (Rucervus
duvaucelii), Eld’s deer (Rucervus eldii),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:22 Apr 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah),
Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx), addax
(Addax nasomaculatus), dama gazelle
(Nanger dama), red lechwe (Kobus
leche), bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus
pygargus), slender-horned gazelle
(Gazella leptoceros), Grevy’s zebra
(Equus grevyi) and Hartmann’s
mountain zebra (Equus zebra
hartmannae) to enhance the species’
propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Applicant: Coastal Exotics Inc.,
Jacksonville, FL; PRT–03596B
The applicant requests a captive-bred
wildlife registration under 50 CFR
17.21(g) for radiated tortoise
(Astrochelys radiata) and black and
white ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata)
to enhance the species’ propagation or
survival. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
Applicant: Susan Minor, Medina, TX;
PRT–03445B
The applicant requests a captive-bred
wildlife registration under 50 CFR
17.21(g) for the barasingha (Rucervus
duvaucelii), Eld’s deer (Rucervus eldii),
scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah),
Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx), addax
(Addax nasomaculatus), dama gazelle
(Nanger dama), and red lechwe (Kobus
leche) to enhance the species’
propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Applicant: Four A Ranch, Oglesby, TX;
PRT–03434B
The applicant requests a captive-bred
wildlife registration under 50 CFR
17.21(g) for the barasingha (Rucervus
duvaucelii), Eld’s deer (Rucervus eldii),
scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah),
Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx), addax
(Addax nasomaculatus), dama gazelle
(Nanger dama), and red lechwe (Kobus
leche) to enhance the species’
propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Applicant: Four A Ranch, Oglesby, TX;
PRT–03435B
The applicant requests a permit
authorizing interstate and foreign
commerce, export, and cull of excess
scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah)
from the captive herd maintained at
their facility, for the purpose of
enhancement of the survival of the
species. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25297
Applicant: Zoological Society of San
Diego, San Diego, CA; PRT–057398
The applicant requests renewal of
their permit to authorize the import of
wild live specimens, viable and nonviable eggs, biological samples and
salvaged materials of California condors
(Gymnogyps californianus) originating
in Mexico, as well as the re-import of
captive-bred/captive hatched live
specimens, viable and non-viable eggs,
biological samples and salvaged
materials of condors originating in the
United States, to enhance the survival of
the species through completion of
identified tasks and objectives
mandated under the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service California Condor
Recovery Plan. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
Brenda Tapia,
Program Analyst/Data Administrator, Branch
of Permits, Division of Management
Authority.
[FR Doc. 2013–10128 Filed 4–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2013–N052;
FXRS12650400000S3–123–FF04R02000]
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), intend to prepare a
programmatic environmental
assessment (PEA) to evaluate the effects
of the cultivation and use of genetically
modified crops (GMCs) on lands that are
part of the National Wildlife Refuge
System in the Southeast Region (Refuge
System lands). The Service’s Southeast
Region includes: Alabama, Arkansas,
Tennessee, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina,
South Carolina, and the Caribbean. We
provide this notice to advise other
Federal and State agencies, Native
American tribes, non-governmental
organizations, and the public of our
intention as well as to obtain
suggestions and information on the
scope of issues to consider during the
PEA planning process.
These actions are part of our effort to
comply with the general provisions of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended (NEPA); NEPA
regulations; other appropriate Federal
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
25298
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2013 / Notices
laws and regulations; and our policies
and procedures for compliance with
those laws and regulations. As a
requirement of NEPA, we must identify
resource issues, develop alternatives for
the use of GMCs, and evaluate the
effects of each of our chosen alternatives
on the human environment.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: A private consultant,
Environmental Management and
Planning Solutions, Inc. (EMPSi), will
support the Internet Web site associated
with the PEA and collect and organize
comments.
You may send comments, questions,
and requests for information by one of
the following methods:
Email: fw4_gmcpea@fws.gov (this
email address will transmit comments
directly to the Service as well as to
EMPSi’s database);
Online portal: https://
sites.google.com/site/
fwsregion4gmcpeis/home (this Internet
Web site, which will serve as the
primary source of information to the
public on the PEA, includes a portal for
sending comments directly to the
Service through EMPSi);
U.S. mail: Richard Warner, NEPA
Coordinator, GMCPEA, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Suite 420, Atlanta, GA
30345.
Mr.
Richard Warner, NEPA Coordinator, at
404–679–7110 (telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Introduction
With this notice, we initiate the
process for developing a PEA on the
cultivation and use of genetically
modified crops (GMCs) on our Refuge
System lands. Our PEA will concentrate
on the refuges in our Region that have
used farming in the recent past and are
likely to do so in the foreseeable future.
The overall analysis in the PEA is
intended, however, to apply to the
entire Southeast Region.
The specific GMCs that will be
analyzed in our PEA are varieties of
corn and soybean that could be used to
provide a sufficient amount of food for
migratory waterfowl and satisfy the
conservation goals of our refuges. The
proposed use of any other GMCs will
require a separate NEPA analysis on a
case-by-case basis.
Background
As part of a settlement in Center for
Food Safety v. Salazar, Case No. 1:11 cv
01457 (D.D.C. 2011), which challenged
the cultivation and use of GMCs on our
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:22 Apr 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
Refuge System lands, we agreed to cease
using GMCs after the 2012 planting
season and to refrain from doing so until
we completed the appropriate level of
NEPA analysis. Up through the end of
the 2012 planting season, certain of our
refuges cultivated and used GMCs as a
management tool to provide food for
millions of ducks, geese, doves, cranes,
and other migrating waterfowl and
shorebirds that inhabit our Refuge
System lands.
At this juncture, we have determined
that a PEA is appropriate to sufficiently
analyze the environmental impacts of
the cultivation and use of GMCs on our
Refuge System lands. If we determine
during preparation of the PEA that it is
not appropriate for our NEPA analysis
or if we are unable to make a finding of
no significant impact at the conclusion
of our analysis via the PEA, we will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) in accordance with
NEPA.
Refuge farming in the Southeast
Region primarily occurs through
cooperative farming agreements that are
entered into by a refuge manager and a
farmer. Via the agreement, the farmer is
authorized to grow crops on a
designated number of acres on the
refuge. In return, the farmer agrees to
harvest an agreed upon percentage share
of the crop and to leave the remaining
crop in the fields as a food source for
migrating birds.
The only GMCs that have been
cultivated and used on our Refuge
System lands are those that have been
evaluated and deregulated by the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture, as described in 7 CFR
340.6. Each of these GMCs was
subjected to extensive scientific
evaluation and regulatory processes
before being granted non-regulated
status, as described at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/regulations/
index.shtml. Each proposal to grant nonregulated status to the GMCs underwent
a NEPA analysis via an environmental
assessment. These environmental
assessments are posted on the APHIS
Web site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
biotechnology/not_reg.html. In addition,
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency evaluates all pesticides
associated with GMCs for general
environmental effects, while the Food
and Drug Administration evaluates the
potential impact of the GMC on food
safety.
The authority for approving GMCs on
refuge lands, nationwide, was delegated
by the Director of the Fish and Wildlife
Service to the Regional Chiefs of the
National Wildlife Refuge System in
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
April 2007. This policy may be found at
https://www.fws.gov/policy/601fw3.html.
We will conduct six public scoping
meetings to solicit input on the issues,
concerns, and alternatives for the
cultivation and use of GMCs on refuges
in the Region. Meetings will be
conducted at the following locations:
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge
(North Carolina); Wheeler National
Wildlife Refuge (Alabama); Tennessee
National Wildlife Refuge (Tennessee);
Vicksburg, Mississippi; and Alexandria,
Louisiana. The addresses, dates, and
times of meetings will be announced
through local and regional media.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, suggestion or
correspondence, you should be aware
that your entire comment—including
your personal identifying information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you may request in your
comment that we withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the
authority of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Dated: March 27, 2013.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–09898 Filed 4–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Geological Survey
[USGS–GX13LR000F60100]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request for the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
(1 Form)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of an extension of a
currently approved information
collection (1028–0059).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We (the USGS) will ask the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to approve the information
collection request (ICR) described
below. This collection consists of 1
form. As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, and as
part of our continuing efforts to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, we
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25297-25298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09898]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2013-N052; FXRS12650400000S3-123-FF04R02000]
Programmatic Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to prepare
a programmatic environmental assessment (PEA) to evaluate the effects
of the cultivation and use of genetically modified crops (GMCs) on
lands that are part of the National Wildlife Refuge System in the
Southeast Region (Refuge System lands). The Service's Southeast Region
includes: Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and the
Caribbean. We provide this notice to advise other Federal and State
agencies, Native American tribes, non-governmental organizations, and
the public of our intention as well as to obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues to consider during the PEA planning
process.
These actions are part of our effort to comply with the general
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended
(NEPA); NEPA regulations; other appropriate Federal
[[Page 25298]]
laws and regulations; and our policies and procedures for compliance
with those laws and regulations. As a requirement of NEPA, we must
identify resource issues, develop alternatives for the use of GMCs, and
evaluate the effects of each of our chosen alternatives on the human
environment.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: A private consultant, Environmental Management and Planning
Solutions, Inc. (EMPSi), will support the Internet Web site associated
with the PEA and collect and organize comments.
You may send comments, questions, and requests for information by
one of the following methods:
Email: fw4_gmcpea@fws.gov (this email address will transmit
comments directly to the Service as well as to EMPSi's database);
Online portal: https://sites.google.com/site/fwsregion4gmcpeis/home
(this Internet Web site, which will serve as the primary source of
information to the public on the PEA, includes a portal for sending
comments directly to the Service through EMPSi);
U.S. mail: Richard Warner, NEPA Coordinator, GMCPEA, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Suite 420, Atlanta, GA 30345.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Warner, NEPA Coordinator,
at 404-679-7110 (telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we initiate the process for developing a PEA on
the cultivation and use of genetically modified crops (GMCs) on our
Refuge System lands. Our PEA will concentrate on the refuges in our
Region that have used farming in the recent past and are likely to do
so in the foreseeable future. The overall analysis in the PEA is
intended, however, to apply to the entire Southeast Region.
The specific GMCs that will be analyzed in our PEA are varieties of
corn and soybean that could be used to provide a sufficient amount of
food for migratory waterfowl and satisfy the conservation goals of our
refuges. The proposed use of any other GMCs will require a separate
NEPA analysis on a case-by-case basis.
Background
As part of a settlement in Center for Food Safety v. Salazar, Case
No. 1:11 cv 01457 (D.D.C. 2011), which challenged the cultivation and
use of GMCs on our Refuge System lands, we agreed to cease using GMCs
after the 2012 planting season and to refrain from doing so until we
completed the appropriate level of NEPA analysis. Up through the end of
the 2012 planting season, certain of our refuges cultivated and used
GMCs as a management tool to provide food for millions of ducks, geese,
doves, cranes, and other migrating waterfowl and shorebirds that
inhabit our Refuge System lands.
At this juncture, we have determined that a PEA is appropriate to
sufficiently analyze the environmental impacts of the cultivation and
use of GMCs on our Refuge System lands. If we determine during
preparation of the PEA that it is not appropriate for our NEPA analysis
or if we are unable to make a finding of no significant impact at the
conclusion of our analysis via the PEA, we will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) in accordance with NEPA.
Refuge farming in the Southeast Region primarily occurs through
cooperative farming agreements that are entered into by a refuge
manager and a farmer. Via the agreement, the farmer is authorized to
grow crops on a designated number of acres on the refuge. In return,
the farmer agrees to harvest an agreed upon percentage share of the
crop and to leave the remaining crop in the fields as a food source for
migrating birds.
The only GMCs that have been cultivated and used on our Refuge
System lands are those that have been evaluated and deregulated by the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, as described in 7 CFR 340.6. Each of these
GMCs was subjected to extensive scientific evaluation and regulatory
processes before being granted non-regulated status, as described at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/regulations/index.shtml. Each proposal to
grant non-regulated status to the GMCs underwent a NEPA analysis via an
environmental assessment. These environmental assessments are posted on
the APHIS Web site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/not_reg.html. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
evaluates all pesticides associated with GMCs for general environmental
effects, while the Food and Drug Administration evaluates the potential
impact of the GMC on food safety.
The authority for approving GMCs on refuge lands, nationwide, was
delegated by the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service to the
Regional Chiefs of the National Wildlife Refuge System in April 2007.
This policy may be found at https://www.fws.gov/policy/601fw3.html.
We will conduct six public scoping meetings to solicit input on the
issues, concerns, and alternatives for the cultivation and use of GMCs
on refuges in the Region. Meetings will be conducted at the following
locations: Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge (North Carolina);
Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge (Alabama); Tennessee National Wildlife
Refuge (Tennessee); Vicksburg, Mississippi; and Alexandria, Louisiana.
The addresses, dates, and times of meetings will be announced through
local and regional media.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, suggestion or
correspondence, you should be aware that your entire comment--including
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available
at any time. While you may request in your comment that we withhold
your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the authority of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Dated: March 27, 2013.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-09898 Filed 4-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P