Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, California; Decreased Assessment Rate, 24983-24985 [2013-09999]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 82 / Monday, April 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
expenditures of $37,400. The
assessment rate of $0.0025 is $0.0005
lower than the previous rate. This action
will allow the Committee to reduce its
financial reserve while still providing
adequate funding to meet program
expenses.
The quantity of assessable potatoes for
the 2013–2014 fiscal period is estimated
at 10,000,000 hundredweight. Thus, the
$0.0025 rate should provide $25,000 in
assessment income. Income derived
from handler assessments, along with
interest income and funds from the
Committee’s authorized reserve, will be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2013–2014 year include $20,000 for
surveillance inspection (compliance
activity), $4,800 for a management
agreement with the Washington State
Potato Commission, $2,500 for
committee expense, and $2,500 for
bonds and insurance. These budgeted
expenses are the same as those
approved for the 2012–2013 fiscal
period.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this rule, including alternative
expenditure levels, but determined that
the recommended expenses were
reasonable and necessary to adequately
cover program operations. Lower
assessment rates were considered, but
not recommended because they would
reduce the financial reserve more than
desired.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming fiscal period indicates
that the producer price for the 2013–
2014 fiscal period could average $7.65
per hundredweight of potatoes.
Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2013–2014 fiscal period
as a percentage of total producer
revenue is 0.0327 percent.
This action decreases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Washington
potato industry. All interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the January 30, 2013, meeting
was a public meeting. All entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments
on this interim rule, including the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, Generic
Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Washington
potato handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2013–2014 fiscal
period begins on July 1, 2013, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each fiscal period apply
to all assessable potatoes handled
during such fiscal period; (2) this action
decreases the assessment rate for
assessable potatoes beginning with the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24983
2013–2014 fiscal period; (3) handlers
are aware of this action, which was
unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting and is
similar to other assessment rate actions
issued in past years; and (4) this interim
rule provides a 60-day comment period,
and all comments timely received will
be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 946
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 946 is amended as
follows:
PART 946—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
IN WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 946 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 946.248 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 946.248
Assessment rate.
On and after July 1, 2013, an
assessment rate of $0.0025 per
hundredweight is established for
Washington potatoes.
Dated: April 23, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–09997 Filed 4–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Docket No. AMS–FV–12–0035; FV12–987–
1 FIR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in
Riverside County, California;
Decreased Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting as a
final rule, without change, an interim
rule that decreased the assessment rate
established for the California Date
Administrative Committee (Committee)
for the 2012–13 and subsequent crop
years from $1.00 to $0.90 per
hundredweight of dates handled. The
Committee locally administers the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
24984
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 82 / Monday, April 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
marketing order which regulates the
handling of dates grown or packed in
Riverside County, California.
Assessments upon date handlers are
used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The crop year begins
October 1 and ends September 30. The
interim rule was necessary because the
2012–13 crop is expected to be larger
than last year’s crop and the current
assessment rate would generate excess
assessment revenues.
DATES: Effective April 30, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathie M. Notoro, Marketing Specialist,
or Martin Engeler, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide;
or by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 987, both as amended (7
CFR part 987), regulating the handling
of dates produced or packed in
Riverside County, California, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Under the order, date handlers are
subject to assessments, which provide
funds to administer the order. It is
intended that the assessment rate as
issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable dates for the entire crop year,
and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. The
Committee’s crop year begins on
October 1 and ends on September 30.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on January 8, 2013,
and effective on January 9, 2013, (78 FR
1130, Doc No. AMS–FV–12–0035;
FV12–987–1 IR), § 987.339 was
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
amended by decreasing the assessment
rate established for dates because the
2012–13 crop is expected to be larger
than last year’s crop and the current
assessment rate would generate excess
assessment revenues. Assessment
revenue, combined with funds from the
sale of cull dates and a contribution
from the California Date Commission to
offset shared marketing expenses, is
expected to provide sufficient funds to
cover the anticipated expenses.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 79 producers
of dates in the production area and 11
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,000,000.
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the 2011 crop year shows that
about 3.68 tons, or 7,360 pounds, of
dates were produced per acre. The 2011
grower price published by the NASS
was $1,320 per ton, or $.66 per pound.
Thus, the value of date production per
acre in 2011 averaged about $4,858
(7,360 pounds times $.66 per pound). At
that average price, a producer would
have to farm over 154 acres to receive
an annual income from dates of
$750,000 ($750,000 divided by $4,858
per acre equals 154 acres). According to
Committee staff, the majority of
California date producers farm less than
154 acres. Thus, it can be concluded
that the majority of date producers
could be considered small entities.
According to data from the Committee
staff, the majority of handlers of
California dates may also be considered
small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2012–13
and subsequent crop years from $1.00 to
$0.90 per hundredweight of dates
handled. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2012–13 expenditures of
$260,000 and an assessment rate of
$0.90 per hundredweight of dates,
which is $0.10 lower than the rate
previously in effect. The quantity of
assessable dates for the 2012–13 crop
year is estimated at 26,500,000 pounds.
Thus, the $0.90 rate should provide
$238,500 in assessment income. Income
derived from handler’s assessments,
along with proceeds from the sale of
cull dates and a contribution from the
California Date Commission for shared
marketing expenses should be adequate
to meet the 2012–13 crop year expenses.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
California date industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the June
12, 2012, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Riverside
County, California, date handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
March 11, 2013. No comments were
received. Therefore, for reasons given in
the interim rule, we are adopting the
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 82 / Monday, April 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
interim rule as a final rule, without
change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov/#!document
Detail;D=AMS–FV-12-0035-0001.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, and
the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (78 FR 1130, January 8, 2013)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 987—DATES PRODUCED OR
PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 987, which was
published at 78 FR 1130 on January 8,
2013, is adopted as a final rule, without
change.
■
Dated: April 23, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–09999 Filed 4–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2004–18033; Directorate
Identifier 2004–CE–16–AD; Amendment 39–
17400; AD 2004–21–08 R1]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna
Aircraft Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The FAA is correcting an
airworthiness directive (AD) that
published in the Federal Register. That
AD applies to all Cessna Aircraft
Company (Cessna) Models 190, 195 (L–
126A,B,C), 195A, and 195B airplanes
that are equipped with certain inboard
aileron hinge brackets. The AD docket
number in the preamble section and the
rule portion of the AD is incorrect. Also,
the statement that no comments on the
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
were received is incorrect. This
document corrects these errors. In all
other respects, the original document
remains the same.
DATES: This correction is effective April
29, 2013. The effective date for AD
2004–21–08 R1 remains May 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Park, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita ACO,
FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Wichita, KS
67209; phone: (316) 946–4123; fax: (316)
946–4107; email: gary.park@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AD 2004–
21–08 R1, amendment 39–17400 (78 FR
20227, April 4, 2013), currently requires
you to repetitively inspect the affected
inboard aileron hinge brackets for cracks
or corrosion and replace them if cracks
or corrosion is found for all Cessna
Models 190, 195 (L–126A,B,C), 195A,
and 195B airplanes that are equipped
with certain inboard aileron hinge
brackets. Replacement with aluminum
brackets would terminate the need for
the repetitive inspections. Future
compliance requires following a revised
service bulletin that clarifies the casting
numbers and part numbers to be
inspected.
As published, the AD docket number
in the final rule headings and in the
headings of the AD is incorrect.
It was incorrectly stated in the
comments section that we received no
comments on the NPRM (78 FR 1155,
January 8, 2013). We received one
supportive comment on the NPRM.
No other part of the preamble or
regulatory information has been
changed; therefore, only the changed
portion of the final rule is being
published in the Federal Register.
The effective date of this AD remains
May 9, 2013.
Correction of Non-Regulatory Text
In the Federal Register of April 4,
2013, AD 2004–21–08 R1; Amendment
39–17400 is corrected as follows:
On page 20227, in the first column, on
line 4 in the headings of the final rule,
change ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2012–18033
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24985
* * *.’’ to ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2004–
18033 * * *.’’
On page 20227, in the third column,
beginning on the second line under the
‘‘Comments’’ section, change the second
sentence from ‘‘We received no
comments on the NPRM (78 FR 1155,
January 8, 2013) or on the determination
of the cost to the public.’’ to ‘‘We
received one supportive comment on
the NPRM (78 FR 1155, January 8, 2013)
and no comments on the determination
of the cost to the public.’’
Correction of Regulatory Text
§ 39.13
[Corrected]
In the Federal Register of April 4,
2013, on page 20228, in the second
column, the AD headings immediately
following the second amendatory
instruction are corrected to read as
follows:
■
2004–21–08 R1 Cessna Aircraft Company:
Amendment 39–17400; Docket No.
FAA–2004–18033; Directorate Identifier
2004–CE–16–AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April
17, 2013.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–09496 Filed 4–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0371; Airspace
Docket No. 12–ANM–14]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Restricted Areas R–
6703A, B, C, D; and Establishment of
Restricted Areas R–6703E, F, G, H, I,
and J; WA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies the
internal boundaries of R–6703 by
further subdividing the airspace from
the current four subareas (A through D)
to ten subareas (A through J). This
change is totally contained within the
current outer boundaries of R–6703. The
designated altitudes and time of
designation remain as currently
published. In addition, the name ‘‘Fort
Lewis, WA,’’ in the titles of the
restricted areas is changed to ‘‘Joint Base
Lewis-McChord, WA. The name of the
using agency is changed from
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 82 (Monday, April 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24983-24985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09999]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Docket No. AMS-FV-12-0035; FV12-987-1 FIR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County,
California; Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule that decreased the assessment
rate established for the California Date Administrative Committee
(Committee) for the 2012-13 and subsequent crop years from $1.00 to
$0.90 per hundredweight of dates handled. The Committee locally
administers the
[[Page 24984]]
marketing order which regulates the handling of dates grown or packed
in Riverside County, California. Assessments upon date handlers are
used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the
program. The crop year begins October 1 and ends September 30. The
interim rule was necessary because the 2012-13 crop is expected to be
larger than last year's crop and the current assessment rate would
generate excess assessment revenues.
DATES: Effective April 30, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathie M. Notoro, Marketing
Specialist, or Martin Engeler, Regional Director, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or Email: Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or
by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax:
(202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 987, both as amended (7 CFR part 987),
regulating the handling of dates produced or packed in Riverside
County, California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order
is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
Under the order, date handlers are subject to assessments, which
provide funds to administer the order. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable
dates for the entire crop year, and continue until amended, suspended,
or terminated. The Committee's crop year begins on October 1 and ends
on September 30.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on January 8,
2013, and effective on January 9, 2013, (78 FR 1130, Doc No. AMS-FV-12-
0035; FV12-987-1 IR), Sec. 987.339 was amended by decreasing the
assessment rate established for dates because the 2012-13 crop is
expected to be larger than last year's crop and the current assessment
rate would generate excess assessment revenues. Assessment revenue,
combined with funds from the sale of cull dates and a contribution from
the California Date Commission to offset shared marketing expenses, is
expected to provide sufficient funds to cover the anticipated expenses.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 79 producers of dates in the production
area and 11 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order.
Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts less
than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000.
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the 2011 crop year shows that about 3.68 tons, or 7,360
pounds, of dates were produced per acre. The 2011 grower price
published by the NASS was $1,320 per ton, or $.66 per pound. Thus, the
value of date production per acre in 2011 averaged about $4,858 (7,360
pounds times $.66 per pound). At that average price, a producer would
have to farm over 154 acres to receive an annual income from dates of
$750,000 ($750,000 divided by $4,858 per acre equals 154 acres).
According to Committee staff, the majority of California date producers
farm less than 154 acres. Thus, it can be concluded that the majority
of date producers could be considered small entities. According to data
from the Committee staff, the majority of handlers of California dates
may also be considered small entities.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee and collected from
handlers for the 2012-13 and subsequent crop years from $1.00 to $0.90
per hundredweight of dates handled. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2012-13 expenditures of $260,000 and an assessment rate of
$0.90 per hundredweight of dates, which is $0.10 lower than the rate
previously in effect. The quantity of assessable dates for the 2012-13
crop year is estimated at 26,500,000 pounds. Thus, the $0.90 rate
should provide $238,500 in assessment income. Income derived from
handler's assessments, along with proceeds from the sale of cull dates
and a contribution from the California Date Commission for shared
marketing expenses should be adequate to meet the 2012-13 crop year
expenses.
Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some of the
costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the assessment
rate reduces the burden on handlers, and may reduce the burden on
producers.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California date industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the June 12,
2012, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178. No changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Riverside County, California,
date handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports
and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements
and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before March 11, 2013. No comments were received. Therefore, for
reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the
[[Page 24985]]
interim rule as a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-12-0035-0001.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (78 FR 1130, January 8, 2013) will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 987--DATES PRODUCED OR PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 7 CFR part 987, which was
published at 78 FR 1130 on January 8, 2013, is adopted as a final rule,
without change.
Dated: April 23, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-09999 Filed 4-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P