Crescent Ranger District; Deschutes National Forest; Klamath County, Oregon; Marsh Project Environmental Impact Statement, 24717-24718 [2013-09747]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices
Geology Management, Federal Building,
200 East Broadway, P.O. Box 7669,
Missoula, MT 59807.
Comments also may be submitted via
facsimile to (406) 329–3536 or by email
to: rtesoro@fs.fed.us.
The public may inspect comments
received at the USDA Forest Service
Northern Region, Minerals and Geology
Management, Federal Building, 200 East
Broadway, Missoula, MT 59807 during
normal business hours. Visitors are
encouraged to call ahead to (406) 329–
3523 to facilitate entry to the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray
TeSoro, Senior Geologist, Minerals and
Geology Management Staff, 406–329–
3523.
Individuals who use TDD may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339, 24 hours a day, every day of
the year, including holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Disposal of Mineral Materials.
OMB Number: 0596–0081.
Expiration Date of Approval:
September 30, 2013.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Mineral Materials Act
of 1947, as amended, and the Multiple
Use Mining Act of 1955, as amended,
authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to
dispose of petrified wood and common
varieties of sand, stone, gravel, pumice,
pumicite, cinders, clay, and other
similar materials on lands administered
by the USDA Forest Service. The
collected information enables the Forest
Service to document planned
operations, to prescribe the terms and
conditions the Agency deems necessary
to protect surface resources, and to
affect a binding contract agreement.
Forest Service employees will evaluate
the collected information to ensure that
entities applying to mine mineral
materials are financially accountable
and will conduct their activities in
accordance with the mineral regulations
of Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 228, Subpart C (36 CFR part 228).
Individuals, organizations,
companies, or corporations interested in
mining mineral materials on National
Forest System lands may contact their
local Forest Service office to inquire
about opportunities, to learn about areas
on which such activities are permitted,
and to request form FS–2800–9
(Contract of Sale for Minerals Materials).
Interested parties are asked to provide
information that includes the
purchaser’s name and address, the
location and dimensions of the area to
be mined, the kind of material that will
be mined, the quantity of material to be
mined, the sales price of the mined
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Apr 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
material, the payment schedule, the
amount of the bond, and the period of
the contract. If this information is not
collected, the Forest Service would be
unable to comply with Federal
regulations to mine materials and
operations could cause undue damage
to surface resources.
Estimate of Burden per Response: 2.5
hours.
Type of Respondents: Mineral
materials operators.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 5,646 responses.
Estimated Annual Number of
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 14,115 hours.
Comment is invited on: (1) Whether
this collection of information is
necessary for the stated purposes and
the proper performance of the functions
of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical or
scientific utility; (2) the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
All comments received in response to
this notice, including names and
addresses when provided, will be a
matter of public record. Comments will
be summarized and included in the
submission request toward Office of
Management and Budget approval.
24717
[FR Doc. 2013–09928 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am]
the Crescent Ranger District just south
of Crescent Lake. The Forest Service is
approaching this project by looking at
the environmental benefits that the
project area provides, from recreation
experiences to wildlife habitat, and from
water quality to scenic views. The goal
of the project is to increase the net
benefits that people receive from the
project area currently, and allow the
area to continue to provide this diverse
range of benefits into the future. We are
using the term ‘‘ecosystem services’’ to
represent all these benefits that areas
such as the Marsh project area provide
to people.
The focal point of the planning area
is Big Marsh, one of the largest high
elevation wetland/marsh complexes in
the continental United States. In the
upland portions of the planning area,
the vegetation is primarily comprised of
lodgepole pine with some ponderosa
pine to the north and mixed conifer on
the valley flanks. The area is also of
high value for its biological resources
(including the largest Oregon Spotted
Frog population in the state), dispersed
recreation opportunities, matsutake
mushroom habitat (a commercially
harvested and culturally significant
species), big game and fish habitat, and
cultural resources, as well as provision
of water quality and quantity flowing
into the Little Deschutes River and
beyond.
The project area is an approximately
30,000 acre watershed, located in T. 24,
25, 25.5, & 26 S, R. 5.5, 6, 6.5, & 7 E.,
Willamette Meridian. The alternatives
will include the proposed action, no
action, and additional alternatives that
respond to issues generated through the
scoping process. The agency will give
notice of the full environmental analysis
and decision making process so
interested and affected people may
participate and contribute to the final
decision.
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DATES:
Dated: April 18, 2013.
Leslie A. C. Weldon,
Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Crescent Ranger District; Deschutes
National Forest; Klamath County,
Oregon; Marsh Project Environmental
Impact Statement
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The USDA, Forest Service,
will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) for a project called
Marsh, in the southwestern portion of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by 30
days following the date that this notice
appears in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Tim Foley, Team Leader, Crescent
Ranger District, P.O. Box 208, Crescent,
Oregon 97733, or submit to commentspacificnorthwest-deschutescrescent@fs.fed.us. Please put ‘‘Marsh
Scoping’’ in the subject line of your
email. You will have another
opportunity for comment when
alternatives have been developed and
the Environmental Impact Statement is
made available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Foley, Team Leader, Crescent Ranger
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24718
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices
District, P.O. Box 208, Crescent, Oregon
97733, phone (541) 433–3200.
Responsible Official: The responsible
official will be Holly Jewkes, Crescent
District Ranger, P.O. Box 208, Crescent,
Oregon 97733.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need: As directed by the
Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act, there
is a need to maintain and enhance the
variety of resources, or environmental
benefits, in combination provided by
National Forest System lands. The
purpose of this project is to manage for
the provision of a suite of ecological and
cultural benefits expressed by the public
which are distinctive to the Marsh
planning area and can be effectively
managed by the Forest Service and its
partners: high quality dispersed
recreation opportunities; matsutake
mushroom habitat; a clean, functioning
water source to the hydrologic system;
high quality habitat for a variety of plant
and animal species, including some
species classified as threatened or
endangered; scenic views; and a sense
of remoteness. There is a need to both
address natural and human threats to
this current range of benefits being
provided, and also enhance the
ecosystem’s capacity to provide a
similar amount and diverse set of
benefits in the future.
Proposed Action: The goal of the
project is to balance impacts to values,
in such a way that the values most at
risk get addressed without substantially
reducing the ability of the landscape to
provide any of the other benefits into
the future. It is in this vein that the
Forest Service proposes the following
actions: Remove approximately 225
acres of lodgepole pine encroachment in
meadows and riparian areas; Plant
approximately 100 acres of hardwoods
and other natural vegetation in riparian
areas; Restore of natural water flow by
recontouring approximately 5 miles of
historical ditches and creating a small
number of beaver dams in the upper
reaches of the watershed; Redefine the
boundaries of approximately 25
dispersed campsites; Restore
approximately 2 miles of closed roads
and user-created ATV trails; Open
approximately 1⁄2 mile of Forest Service
road 5825–540 to the public; Remove
approximately 65 acres of Invasive Reed
Canary Grass; Thin approximately 725
acres of trees for fuels and density
management; Approximately 1,000
acres of prescribed fire in areas
dominated by ponderosa pine; Enhance
a small number of scenic view
opportunities through vegetation
management.
Comment: Public comments about
this proposal are requested in order to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Apr 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
assist in identifying issues, determine
how to best manage the resources, and
to focus the analysis. Comments
received to this notice, including names
and addresses of those who comment,
will be considered part of the public
record on this proposed action and will
be available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to
object to the subsequent decision under
36 CFR part 218. Additionally, pursuant
to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may
request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by
showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that,
under FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the agency’s decision
regarding the request for confidentiality,
and where the request is denied the
agency will return the submission and
notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without
name and address within a specified
number of days. A draft EIS will be filed
with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and available for public
review by Spring 2014. The EPA will
publish a Notice of Availability (NOA)
of the draft EIS in the Federal Register.
The final EIS is scheduled to be
available early fall 2014. The comment
period on the draft EIS will be 45 days
from the date the EPA publishes the
notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions
[Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)].
Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft EIS stage but
that are not raised until after completion
of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon
v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that comments and
objections are made available to the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits
of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
In the final EIS, the Forest Service is
required to respond to substantive
comments received during the comment
period for the draft EIS. The Forest
Service is the lead agency and the
responsible official is the Crescent
District Ranger, Deschutes National
Forest. The responsible official will
decide where, and whether or not to
manage for recreation, hydrology,
access, vegetation and other resources,
values and ecosystem services within
the project area. The responsible official
will also decide how to mitigate impacts
of these actions and will determine
when and how monitoring of effects
will take place.
The Marsh Project decision and
rationale will be documented in the
Record of Decision. Per 36 CFR
218.7(a)(2), this is a project
implementing a land management plan
and not authorized under the HFRA,
section 101(2), and is thus subject to
subparts A and C of 36 CFR part 218—
Project-level Predecisional
Administrative Review Process.
Dated: April 16, 2013.
Holly Jewkes,
Crescent District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2013–09747 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests;
Idaho; Lolo Insect & Disease Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service gives
notice of its intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Lolo Insect & Disease project to analyze
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24717-24718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09747]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Crescent Ranger District; Deschutes National Forest; Klamath
County, Oregon; Marsh Project Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service, will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) for a project called Marsh, in the southwestern portion
of the Crescent Ranger District just south of Crescent Lake. The Forest
Service is approaching this project by looking at the environmental
benefits that the project area provides, from recreation experiences to
wildlife habitat, and from water quality to scenic views. The goal of
the project is to increase the net benefits that people receive from
the project area currently, and allow the area to continue to provide
this diverse range of benefits into the future. We are using the term
``ecosystem services'' to represent all these benefits that areas such
as the Marsh project area provide to people.
The focal point of the planning area is Big Marsh, one of the
largest high elevation wetland/marsh complexes in the continental
United States. In the upland portions of the planning area, the
vegetation is primarily comprised of lodgepole pine with some ponderosa
pine to the north and mixed conifer on the valley flanks. The area is
also of high value for its biological resources (including the largest
Oregon Spotted Frog population in the state), dispersed recreation
opportunities, matsutake mushroom habitat (a commercially harvested and
culturally significant species), big game and fish habitat, and
cultural resources, as well as provision of water quality and quantity
flowing into the Little Deschutes River and beyond.
The project area is an approximately 30,000 acre watershed, located
in T. 24, 25, 25.5, & 26 S, R. 5.5, 6, 6.5, & 7 E., Willamette
Meridian. The alternatives will include the proposed action, no action,
and additional alternatives that respond to issues generated through
the scoping process. The agency will give notice of the full
environmental analysis and decision making process so interested and
affected people may participate and contribute to the final decision.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by 30 days following the date that this notice appears in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Tim Foley, Team Leader, Crescent
Ranger District, P.O. Box 208, Crescent, Oregon 97733, or submit to
comments-pacificnorthwest-deschutes-crescent@fs.fed.us. Please put
``Marsh Scoping'' in the subject line of your email. You will have
another opportunity for comment when alternatives have been developed
and the Environmental Impact Statement is made available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Foley, Team Leader, Crescent
Ranger
[[Page 24718]]
District, P.O. Box 208, Crescent, Oregon 97733, phone (541) 433-3200.
Responsible Official: The responsible official will be Holly
Jewkes, Crescent District Ranger, P.O. Box 208, Crescent, Oregon 97733.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need: As directed by the Multiple Use Sustained Yield
Act, there is a need to maintain and enhance the variety of resources,
or environmental benefits, in combination provided by National Forest
System lands. The purpose of this project is to manage for the
provision of a suite of ecological and cultural benefits expressed by
the public which are distinctive to the Marsh planning area and can be
effectively managed by the Forest Service and its partners: high
quality dispersed recreation opportunities; matsutake mushroom habitat;
a clean, functioning water source to the hydrologic system; high
quality habitat for a variety of plant and animal species, including
some species classified as threatened or endangered; scenic views; and
a sense of remoteness. There is a need to both address natural and
human threats to this current range of benefits being provided, and
also enhance the ecosystem's capacity to provide a similar amount and
diverse set of benefits in the future.
Proposed Action: The goal of the project is to balance impacts to
values, in such a way that the values most at risk get addressed
without substantially reducing the ability of the landscape to provide
any of the other benefits into the future. It is in this vein that the
Forest Service proposes the following actions: Remove approximately 225
acres of lodgepole pine encroachment in meadows and riparian areas;
Plant approximately 100 acres of hardwoods and other natural vegetation
in riparian areas; Restore of natural water flow by recontouring
approximately 5 miles of historical ditches and creating a small number
of beaver dams in the upper reaches of the watershed; Redefine the
boundaries of approximately 25 dispersed campsites; Restore
approximately 2 miles of closed roads and user-created ATV trails; Open
approximately \1/2\ mile of Forest Service road 5825-540 to the public;
Remove approximately 65 acres of Invasive Reed Canary Grass; Thin
approximately 725 acres of trees for fuels and density management;
Approximately 1,000 acres of prescribed fire in areas dominated by
ponderosa pine; Enhance a small number of scenic view opportunities
through vegetation management.
Comment: Public comments about this proposal are requested in order
to assist in identifying issues, determine how to best manage the
resources, and to focus the analysis. Comments received to this notice,
including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered
part of the public record on this proposed action and will be available
for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted
and considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not
have standing to object to the subsequent decision under 36 CFR part
218. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request
the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing
how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality.
Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under
FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service
will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding the
request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied the agency
will return the submission and notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a specified
number of days. A draft EIS will be filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and available for public review by Spring 2014.
The EPA will publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft EIS in
the Federal Register. The final EIS is scheduled to be available early
fall 2014. The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the
date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)]. Also, environmental
objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not
raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334,
1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by
the close of the 45-day comment period so that comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
In the final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to
substantive comments received during the comment period for the draft
EIS. The Forest Service is the lead agency and the responsible official
is the Crescent District Ranger, Deschutes National Forest. The
responsible official will decide where, and whether or not to manage
for recreation, hydrology, access, vegetation and other resources,
values and ecosystem services within the project area. The responsible
official will also decide how to mitigate impacts of these actions and
will determine when and how monitoring of effects will take place.
The Marsh Project decision and rationale will be documented in the
Record of Decision. Per 36 CFR 218.7(a)(2), this is a project
implementing a land management plan and not authorized under the HFRA,
section 101(2), and is thus subject to subparts A and C of 36 CFR part
218--Project-level Predecisional Administrative Review Process.
Dated: April 16, 2013.
Holly Jewkes,
Crescent District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2013-09747 Filed 4-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P