Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests; Idaho; Lolo Insect & Disease Project, 24718-24721 [2013-09710]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24718
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices
District, P.O. Box 208, Crescent, Oregon
97733, phone (541) 433–3200.
Responsible Official: The responsible
official will be Holly Jewkes, Crescent
District Ranger, P.O. Box 208, Crescent,
Oregon 97733.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need: As directed by the
Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act, there
is a need to maintain and enhance the
variety of resources, or environmental
benefits, in combination provided by
National Forest System lands. The
purpose of this project is to manage for
the provision of a suite of ecological and
cultural benefits expressed by the public
which are distinctive to the Marsh
planning area and can be effectively
managed by the Forest Service and its
partners: high quality dispersed
recreation opportunities; matsutake
mushroom habitat; a clean, functioning
water source to the hydrologic system;
high quality habitat for a variety of plant
and animal species, including some
species classified as threatened or
endangered; scenic views; and a sense
of remoteness. There is a need to both
address natural and human threats to
this current range of benefits being
provided, and also enhance the
ecosystem’s capacity to provide a
similar amount and diverse set of
benefits in the future.
Proposed Action: The goal of the
project is to balance impacts to values,
in such a way that the values most at
risk get addressed without substantially
reducing the ability of the landscape to
provide any of the other benefits into
the future. It is in this vein that the
Forest Service proposes the following
actions: Remove approximately 225
acres of lodgepole pine encroachment in
meadows and riparian areas; Plant
approximately 100 acres of hardwoods
and other natural vegetation in riparian
areas; Restore of natural water flow by
recontouring approximately 5 miles of
historical ditches and creating a small
number of beaver dams in the upper
reaches of the watershed; Redefine the
boundaries of approximately 25
dispersed campsites; Restore
approximately 2 miles of closed roads
and user-created ATV trails; Open
approximately 1⁄2 mile of Forest Service
road 5825–540 to the public; Remove
approximately 65 acres of Invasive Reed
Canary Grass; Thin approximately 725
acres of trees for fuels and density
management; Approximately 1,000
acres of prescribed fire in areas
dominated by ponderosa pine; Enhance
a small number of scenic view
opportunities through vegetation
management.
Comment: Public comments about
this proposal are requested in order to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Apr 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
assist in identifying issues, determine
how to best manage the resources, and
to focus the analysis. Comments
received to this notice, including names
and addresses of those who comment,
will be considered part of the public
record on this proposed action and will
be available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to
object to the subsequent decision under
36 CFR part 218. Additionally, pursuant
to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may
request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by
showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that,
under FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the agency’s decision
regarding the request for confidentiality,
and where the request is denied the
agency will return the submission and
notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without
name and address within a specified
number of days. A draft EIS will be filed
with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and available for public
review by Spring 2014. The EPA will
publish a Notice of Availability (NOA)
of the draft EIS in the Federal Register.
The final EIS is scheduled to be
available early fall 2014. The comment
period on the draft EIS will be 45 days
from the date the EPA publishes the
notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions
[Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)].
Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft EIS stage but
that are not raised until after completion
of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon
v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that comments and
objections are made available to the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits
of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
In the final EIS, the Forest Service is
required to respond to substantive
comments received during the comment
period for the draft EIS. The Forest
Service is the lead agency and the
responsible official is the Crescent
District Ranger, Deschutes National
Forest. The responsible official will
decide where, and whether or not to
manage for recreation, hydrology,
access, vegetation and other resources,
values and ecosystem services within
the project area. The responsible official
will also decide how to mitigate impacts
of these actions and will determine
when and how monitoring of effects
will take place.
The Marsh Project decision and
rationale will be documented in the
Record of Decision. Per 36 CFR
218.7(a)(2), this is a project
implementing a land management plan
and not authorized under the HFRA,
section 101(2), and is thus subject to
subparts A and C of 36 CFR part 218—
Project-level Predecisional
Administrative Review Process.
Dated: April 16, 2013.
Holly Jewkes,
Crescent District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2013–09747 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests;
Idaho; Lolo Insect & Disease Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service gives
notice of its intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Lolo Insect & Disease project to analyze
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices
and disclose the effects of proposed
forest management and watershed
improvement activities within the Lolo
Creek watershed, located approximately
16 miles northeast of Kamiah, Idaho.
The proposed action would use a
combination of timber harvest, precommercial thinning, and reforestation
to achieve the desired range of age
classes, size classes, vegetative species
distributions, habitat complexity
(diversity) and landscape patterns
across the forested portions of the
project area. Road decommissioning,
culvert replacements, road
improvements, and soils rehabilitation
are also proposed to improve watershed
health. The EIS will analyze the effects
of the proposed action and alternatives.
The Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest invites
comments and suggestions on the issues
to be addressed. The agency gives notice
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) analysis and decision
making process on the proposal so
interested and affected members of the
public may participate and contribute to
the final decision.
DATES: The Draft Environmental Impact
Statement is expected in February 2014,
and will be followed by a 45-day public
comment period. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected in October 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send written or electronic
comments to Lois Hill, Interdisciplinary
Team Leader; Kamiah Ranger Station;
903 3rd Street; Kamiah, ID 83536; FAX
208–935–4257; Email commentsnorthern-clearwater-lochsa@fs.fed.us.
Include your name, address,
organization represented (if any), and
the name of the project for which you
are submitting comments. Electronic
comments will be accepted in MS Word,
Word Perfect, or Rich Text formats.
Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois
Hill, Interdisciplinary Team Leader,
(208) 935–4258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
objective of the Lolo Insect & Disease
Project is to manage forest vegetation to
restore natural disturbance patterns;
improve long term resistance and
resilience at the landscape level; reduce
fuels; improve watershed conditions;
improve habitat for early seral species;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Apr 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
and maintain habitat structure, function,
and diversity. Timber outputs from the
proposed action would be used to offset
treatment costs and support the
economic structure of local
communities and provide for regional
and national needs.
Purpose and Need for the Proposal
Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat
Improvement
Existing Condition: Most of the
project area is in Forest Plan
Management Area (MA) E1. MA E1 is
timber-producing land to be managed
for healthy timber stands to optimize
potential timber growing. Timber
production is to be cost-effective and
provide maximum protection of soil and
water quality. Big game, primarily elk,
is to be managed through limited road
closures. Dispersed recreation and
livestock grazing will be provided if
compatible with timber management
goals.
In the project area, fires that occurred
in 1910 and 1934 and the introduction
of white pine blister rust have created
a homogeneous age class and species
composition which has become highly
susceptible to insect and disease change
agents due to its current age. Mortality
in grand fir and Douglas-fir dominated
stands is increasing from root disease,
Douglas-fir bark beetle and grand fir
engraver. Currently, a higher percentage
of grand fir and Douglas-fir exist than
natural long-term disturbances patterns
would have created and that would
have dominated these habitat types in
the absence of historical disturbance
events. Grand fir and Douglas-fir are
more susceptible to insects and
diseases, and grand fir is less likely to
survive intense wildfires, than early
seral species such as ponderosa pine,
western larch, and western white pine.
Young forest habitat is lacking on this
landscape, while the quality of available
habitat for sensitive and old growthassociated species has declined. Patches
of young forest that do exist are smaller
with edges that are straighter and more
even than natural disturbances would
have created.
Desired Condition: The desired
condition is a forest structure with a
range of age and size classes with
species diversity that is resistant and
resilient to change agents such as
insects, diseases, and wildfires. Early
seral species (white pine, larch) should
represent a greater percentage of the
species mix.
Need for Action: Vegetation in this
area needs to be managed to create a
more diverse and resilient forest
structure by creating a range of age and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24719
size classes, species diversity, and
disturbance patterns that more closely
emulate the results of natural
disturbance. A need exists to shift tree
species composition away from shadetolerant species toward more resistant
and resilient early seral species.
Restoration of blister rust resistant white
pine is a primary objective.
Goods and Services
Existing Condition: Much of the
Project area consists of grand firdominated stands. Insect and disease
infestations are contributing to
increased tree mortality, while
decreasing timber volume and value.
Desired Condition: The desired
condition is to provide a sustained yield
of resource outputs as directed by the
Clearwater Forest Plan.
Need for Action: Stands that are
infested with insects and diseases need
to be treated so that the harvested
timber can provide materials for local
industries.
Watershed Improvement
The emphasis for watershed
restoration in the Lolo Creek drainage is
associated with roads and soil
improvement.
Existing Condition: Gravel and native
surface roads could contribute sediment
to stream channels, which can affect
water quality and fish habitat. There are
555 miles of system and 40 miles of
non-system road in the Lolo Creek
watershed. A total of 500 miles occurs
within designated PACFISH buffers.
Desired Condition: The desired
condition is to maintain a road system
in the Lolo Creek watershed that is
adequate to provide for continued
recreation, commodity production, and
administrative use as described in the
Clearwater Forest Plan while
maintaining fish and water quality
objectives.
Need for Action: Improving watershed
function and stream conditions by
reducing road densities and repairing
existing roads and culverts to reduce
sediment and improve drainage is
needed. New system roads would be
constructed to provide a long term
transportation system while reducing
roads located within riparian habitat
conservation areas.
Transportation Planning
Existing Condition: Transportation
planning has been done on a project by
project basis without analyzing the
entire transportations system as a
whole.
Desired Condition: A diversity of
motorized access adequate to provide
for continued recreation, commodity
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
24720
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices
production, and administrative use as
described in the Clearwater Forest Plan.
Need for Action: A comprehensive
transportation plan including all
motorized access opportunities.
Implementation of the resulting
transportation plan would create a
sustainable transportation system.
Soil Improvement
Existing Condition: Past management
activities have resulted in areas of soil
detrimental disturbance, mostly in the
form of compacted or displaced soil or
loss of organic matter.
Desired Condition: Soils are
productive (functioning soil biology,
soil hydrology, and nutrient cycling)
and stable.
Need for Action: Watershed function
can be improved by restoring compacted
soils and adding organic material on old
skid trails and landings. Restoration of
meadow function with seeding and
planting of native species.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Proposed Action
The Lochsa District proposes the
following vegetation management
actions to improve forest health, provide
goods and services, and improve
wildlife habitat:
General Project Area
• Variable retention regeneration
harvest and site preparation activities
would be conducted on approximately
3,000 acres. Stands that are currently
being affected by biotic change agents
would be targeted for treatment.
Regeneration harvest would create early
successional plant communities and
habitat. Other silvicultural prescriptions
would be used in portions of units to
address specific resource concerns, such
as areas within the National Historic
Landmark Corridor that require
retention to meet visual objectives.
• Regeneration would focus on
restoring white pine and other longlived early seral species.
• Variable retention regeneration
harvest would include areas of full
retention (clumps), irregular edges, and
retention of snags and legacy trees to
provide structure and a future source of
woody debris. Some openings may
exceed 40 acres.
• Construct a minimum temporary
road system to carry out the proposed
action. Roads would be
decommissioned after use.
• Harvest would include utilizing
ground based, skyline, and helicopter
yarding systems.
• Harvesting may occur within
Pacfish buffers where they overlap on
dry ridges or occur as a sliver above
system roads.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Apr 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Soil rehabilitation would occur on
approximately 50 acres of currently
detrimentally disturbed areas associated
with past harvest related activities.
Activities could include decompaction,
mastication, fertilization, seeding, and
addition of woody material/organic
material. These 50 acres of soil
rehabilitation would be in addition to
the soil rehabilitation associated with
the transportation system and the
Musselshell rehabilitation area.
Transportation System
The following road improvement
actions are proposed to reduce sediment
production and address transportation
needs. Road improvements would occur
on up to 125 miles of roads within the
project area:
• Add cross drains on either side of
perennial streams, fish-bearing would
be the highest priority followed by nonfish bearing perennials. These would be
determined and prioritized based on
field review.
• Replace crossings on perennial
streams with structures appropriately
sized for a 100-year event. These would
be prioritized by the zone fish biologist.
• Stabilize eroding sections of road:
this could include blading followed by
spot rocking or the addition of drainage
structures where needed.
• Road decommissioning is proposed
on approximately 100–150 miles of
system road and approximately 40 miles
of non-system road. In most cases this
includes fully re-contouring the road.
• Off-highway vehicle opportunities
would be considered during the roads
analysis.
• Soil rehabilitation would occur on
approximately 45 acres of currently
detrimentally disturbed areas associated
with past harvest related activities.
Activities could include decompaction,
mastication, fertilization, seeding, and
addition of woody material/organic
material. These 45 acres of soil
rehabilitation would be in addition to
the soil rehabilitation associated with
the general project area and the
Musselshell rehabilitation area.
• New system roads would be
constructed to provide a long term
transportation system while reducing
roads located within riparian habitat
conservation areas.
• Deferred maintenance opportunities
(such as any needed reconstruction on
trails in the National Historic Trail
corridors) will be considered during
alternative development and the
environmental analysis.
Musselshell Restoration Area
The following actions are proposed to
improve soil and vegetation conditions
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in the Musselshell Restoration Area
portion (1600 acres) of the Lolo Insect
& Disease project area:
• Approximately 500 acres of white
pine restoration would be accomplished
through commercial thinning and
creating small openings to plant blister
rust resistant seedlings. Commercial
thinning would also benefit other
species and contribute to ecosystem
health.
• Meadow restoration would occur in
various places across the restoration
area, and would be achieved through
riparian shrub/tree/grass/forbs planting
along the meadow in the Musselshell
restoration area. Temporary fencing or
other protection, such as tubing, would
be installed to keep livestock and
wildlife out.
• Meadow restoration would be
conducted in two phases. During the
first phase, half of the area would be
planted and then protected for 5 years
to allow for establishment. After that,
the second phase would be completed.
This approach would minimize impacts
to the grazing allotment permittee.
• Soil rehabilitation would occur on
approximately 55 acres of currently
detrimentally disturbed areas associated
with past harvest related activities.
Activities could include decompaction,
mastication, fertilization, seeding, and
addition of woody material/organic
material. These 55 acres of soil
rehabilitation would be in addition to
the soil rehabilitation associated with
the transportation system and the
Musselshell rehabilitation area.
Possible Alternatives: The Forest
Service will consider include a noaction alternative, which will serve as a
baseline for comparison of alternatives.
The proposed action will be considered
along with additional alternatives that
will be developed to meet the purpose
and need for action, and to address
significant issues identified during
scoping.
The Responsible Official: Rick Brazell,
Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest Supervisor,
Clearwater National Forest Supervisor’s
Office, 12730 Highway 12, Orofino, ID
83544.
The Decision To Be Made: Whether to
adopt the proposed action, in whole or
in part, or another alternative; and what
mitigation measures and management
requirements will be implemented.
The Scoping Process: The scoping
process identifies issues to be analyzed
in detail and leads to the development
of alternatives to the proposal. The
Forest Service is seeking information
and comments from other Federal, State,
and local agencies; Tribal Governments;
and organizations and individuals who
may be interested in or affected by the
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2013 / Notices
proposed action. Comments received in
response to this notice, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be a part of the project
record and available for public review.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
will be prepared for comment. The next
major opportunity for public input will
be when the DEIS is published. The
comment period for the DEIS will be 45
days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice
of availability in the Federal Register.
The Draft EIS is anticipated to be
available for public review in February
2014.
Dated: April 15, 2013.
Rick Brazell,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2013–09710 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
Notice of Request for Extension of a
Currently Approved Information
Collection
The Rural Housing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed collection; Comments
requested.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Rural Housing
Service’s intention to request an
extension for a currently approved
information collection in support of the
program for ‘‘Section 515 Multi-Family
Housing Preservation and Revitalization
Restructuring Demonstration Program
(MPR) for Fiscal Year 2006.’’
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by June 25, 2013 to be assured
of consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melinda Price, Finance and Housing
Analyst, Multi-Family Housing and
Preservation and Direct Loan Division,
Federal Building, 200 North High Street,
Room 597, Columbia, Ohio 43215, (614)
255–2403
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Section 515 Multi-Family
Housing Preservation and Revitalization
Restructuring (MPR) Demonstration
Program.
OMB Number: 0575–0190.
Expiration Date of Approval: July 31,
2013.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Apr 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: The Agriculture, Rural
Development, Food and Drug
Administration, and Related Agencies
Appropriation Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109–
97) provides funding for, and authorizes
Rural Development to conduct a
demonstration program for the
preservation and revitalization of the
Section 515 Multi-Family Housing
portfolio. Section 515 of the Housing
Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1485) provides
Rural Development the authority to
make loans for low-income MultiFamily Housing and related facilities.
Rural Development refers to this
program as Multi-Family Housing
Preservation and Revitalization
Restructuring Program (MPR). A NOFA
sets forth the eligibility and application
requirements. Information will be
collected from applicants and grant
recipients by Rural Development staff in
its Local, Area, State, and National
offices. This information will be used to
determine applicant eligibility for this
demonstration program. If an applicant
proposal is selected, that applicant will
be notified of the selection and given
the opportunity to submit a formal
application.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 1 hour per
response.
Respondents: Individuals,
partnerships, public and private
nonprofit corporations, agencies,
institutions, organizations, and Indian
tribes.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,500.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Number of Responses:
2,420.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2,720.
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Jeanne Jacobs,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, Support Services
Division at (202) 692–0040.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of Rural
Development, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of Rural Development’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24721
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Jeanne Jacobs,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, Support Services
Division, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Support Services Division,
STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20250. All
responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Dated: April 17, 2013.
˜
Tammye Trevino,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–09894 Filed 4–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China: Amended Final
Results of the Third Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 26, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On March 18, 2013, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published
the final results of the third
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’).1 On March 13, 2013,
Hongli et al.2 filed timely allegations
1 See Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China; Final Results of Third
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–
2011, 78 FR 16651 (March 18, 2013), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
(‘‘Final Results’’).
2 Itochu Building Products Co., Inc., Tianjin
Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Hongli’’), Certified Products International Inc.
(‘‘CPI’’), China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
(‘‘China Staple’’), Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp.,
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
Continued
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24718-24721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09710]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests; Idaho; Lolo Insect &
Disease Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service gives notice of its intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the Lolo Insect & Disease project to
analyze
[[Page 24719]]
and disclose the effects of proposed forest management and watershed
improvement activities within the Lolo Creek watershed, located
approximately 16 miles northeast of Kamiah, Idaho. The proposed action
would use a combination of timber harvest, pre-commercial thinning, and
reforestation to achieve the desired range of age classes, size
classes, vegetative species distributions, habitat complexity
(diversity) and landscape patterns across the forested portions of the
project area. Road decommissioning, culvert replacements, road
improvements, and soils rehabilitation are also proposed to improve
watershed health. The EIS will analyze the effects of the proposed
action and alternatives. The Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest invites
comments and suggestions on the issues to be addressed. The agency
gives notice of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis
and decision making process on the proposal so interested and affected
members of the public may participate and contribute to the final
decision.
DATES: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is expected in February
2014, and will be followed by a 45-day public comment period. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement is expected in October 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send written or electronic comments to Lois Hill,
Interdisciplinary Team Leader; Kamiah Ranger Station; 903 3rd Street;
Kamiah, ID 83536; FAX 208-935-4257; Email comments-northern-clearwater-lochsa@fs.fed.us. Include your name, address, organization represented
(if any), and the name of the project for which you are submitting
comments. Electronic comments will be accepted in MS Word, Word
Perfect, or Rich Text formats. Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments
submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however,
anonymous comments will not provide the Agency with the ability to
provide the respondent with subsequent environmental documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Hill, Interdisciplinary Team
Leader, (208) 935-4258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The objective of the Lolo Insect & Disease
Project is to manage forest vegetation to restore natural disturbance
patterns; improve long term resistance and resilience at the landscape
level; reduce fuels; improve watershed conditions; improve habitat for
early seral species; and maintain habitat structure, function, and
diversity. Timber outputs from the proposed action would be used to
offset treatment costs and support the economic structure of local
communities and provide for regional and national needs.
Purpose and Need for the Proposal
Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Improvement
Existing Condition: Most of the project area is in Forest Plan
Management Area (MA) E1. MA E1 is timber-producing land to be managed
for healthy timber stands to optimize potential timber growing. Timber
production is to be cost-effective and provide maximum protection of
soil and water quality. Big game, primarily elk, is to be managed
through limited road closures. Dispersed recreation and livestock
grazing will be provided if compatible with timber management goals.
In the project area, fires that occurred in 1910 and 1934 and the
introduction of white pine blister rust have created a homogeneous age
class and species composition which has become highly susceptible to
insect and disease change agents due to its current age. Mortality in
grand fir and Douglas-fir dominated stands is increasing from root
disease, Douglas-fir bark beetle and grand fir engraver. Currently, a
higher percentage of grand fir and Douglas-fir exist than natural long-
term disturbances patterns would have created and that would have
dominated these habitat types in the absence of historical disturbance
events. Grand fir and Douglas-fir are more susceptible to insects and
diseases, and grand fir is less likely to survive intense wildfires,
than early seral species such as ponderosa pine, western larch, and
western white pine.
Young forest habitat is lacking on this landscape, while the
quality of available habitat for sensitive and old growth-associated
species has declined. Patches of young forest that do exist are smaller
with edges that are straighter and more even than natural disturbances
would have created.
Desired Condition: The desired condition is a forest structure with
a range of age and size classes with species diversity that is
resistant and resilient to change agents such as insects, diseases, and
wildfires. Early seral species (white pine, larch) should represent a
greater percentage of the species mix.
Need for Action: Vegetation in this area needs to be managed to
create a more diverse and resilient forest structure by creating a
range of age and size classes, species diversity, and disturbance
patterns that more closely emulate the results of natural disturbance.
A need exists to shift tree species composition away from shade-
tolerant species toward more resistant and resilient early seral
species. Restoration of blister rust resistant white pine is a primary
objective.
Goods and Services
Existing Condition: Much of the Project area consists of grand fir-
dominated stands. Insect and disease infestations are contributing to
increased tree mortality, while decreasing timber volume and value.
Desired Condition: The desired condition is to provide a sustained
yield of resource outputs as directed by the Clearwater Forest Plan.
Need for Action: Stands that are infested with insects and diseases
need to be treated so that the harvested timber can provide materials
for local industries.
Watershed Improvement
The emphasis for watershed restoration in the Lolo Creek drainage
is associated with roads and soil improvement.
Existing Condition: Gravel and native surface roads could
contribute sediment to stream channels, which can affect water quality
and fish habitat. There are 555 miles of system and 40 miles of non-
system road in the Lolo Creek watershed. A total of 500 miles occurs
within designated PACFISH buffers.
Desired Condition: The desired condition is to maintain a road
system in the Lolo Creek watershed that is adequate to provide for
continued recreation, commodity production, and administrative use as
described in the Clearwater Forest Plan while maintaining fish and
water quality objectives.
Need for Action: Improving watershed function and stream conditions
by reducing road densities and repairing existing roads and culverts to
reduce sediment and improve drainage is needed. New system roads would
be constructed to provide a long term transportation system while
reducing roads located within riparian habitat conservation areas.
Transportation Planning
Existing Condition: Transportation planning has been done on a
project by project basis without analyzing the entire transportations
system as a whole.
Desired Condition: A diversity of motorized access adequate to
provide for continued recreation, commodity
[[Page 24720]]
production, and administrative use as described in the Clearwater
Forest Plan.
Need for Action: A comprehensive transportation plan including all
motorized access opportunities. Implementation of the resulting
transportation plan would create a sustainable transportation system.
Soil Improvement
Existing Condition: Past management activities have resulted in
areas of soil detrimental disturbance, mostly in the form of compacted
or displaced soil or loss of organic matter.
Desired Condition: Soils are productive (functioning soil biology,
soil hydrology, and nutrient cycling) and stable.
Need for Action: Watershed function can be improved by restoring
compacted soils and adding organic material on old skid trails and
landings. Restoration of meadow function with seeding and planting of
native species.
The Proposed Action
The Lochsa District proposes the following vegetation management
actions to improve forest health, provide goods and services, and
improve wildlife habitat:
General Project Area
Variable retention regeneration harvest and site
preparation activities would be conducted on approximately 3,000 acres.
Stands that are currently being affected by biotic change agents would
be targeted for treatment. Regeneration harvest would create early
successional plant communities and habitat. Other silvicultural
prescriptions would be used in portions of units to address specific
resource concerns, such as areas within the National Historic Landmark
Corridor that require retention to meet visual objectives.
Regeneration would focus on restoring white pine and other
long-lived early seral species.
Variable retention regeneration harvest would include
areas of full retention (clumps), irregular edges, and retention of
snags and legacy trees to provide structure and a future source of
woody debris. Some openings may exceed 40 acres.
Construct a minimum temporary road system to carry out the
proposed action. Roads would be decommissioned after use.
Harvest would include utilizing ground based, skyline, and
helicopter yarding systems.
Harvesting may occur within Pacfish buffers where they
overlap on dry ridges or occur as a sliver above system roads.
Soil rehabilitation would occur on approximately 50 acres
of currently detrimentally disturbed areas associated with past harvest
related activities. Activities could include decompaction, mastication,
fertilization, seeding, and addition of woody material/organic
material. These 50 acres of soil rehabilitation would be in addition to
the soil rehabilitation associated with the transportation system and
the Musselshell rehabilitation area.
Transportation System
The following road improvement actions are proposed to reduce
sediment production and address transportation needs. Road improvements
would occur on up to 125 miles of roads within the project area:
Add cross drains on either side of perennial streams,
fish-bearing would be the highest priority followed by non-fish bearing
perennials. These would be determined and prioritized based on field
review.
Replace crossings on perennial streams with structures
appropriately sized for a 100-year event. These would be prioritized by
the zone fish biologist.
Stabilize eroding sections of road: this could include
blading followed by spot rocking or the addition of drainage structures
where needed.
Road decommissioning is proposed on approximately 100-150
miles of system road and approximately 40 miles of non-system road. In
most cases this includes fully re-contouring the road.
Off-highway vehicle opportunities would be considered
during the roads analysis.
Soil rehabilitation would occur on approximately 45 acres
of currently detrimentally disturbed areas associated with past harvest
related activities. Activities could include decompaction, mastication,
fertilization, seeding, and addition of woody material/organic
material. These 45 acres of soil rehabilitation would be in addition to
the soil rehabilitation associated with the general project area and
the Musselshell rehabilitation area.
New system roads would be constructed to provide a long
term transportation system while reducing roads located within riparian
habitat conservation areas.
Deferred maintenance opportunities (such as any needed
reconstruction on trails in the National Historic Trail corridors) will
be considered during alternative development and the environmental
analysis.
Musselshell Restoration Area
The following actions are proposed to improve soil and vegetation
conditions in the Musselshell Restoration Area portion (1600 acres) of
the Lolo Insect & Disease project area:
Approximately 500 acres of white pine restoration would be
accomplished through commercial thinning and creating small openings to
plant blister rust resistant seedlings. Commercial thinning would also
benefit other species and contribute to ecosystem health.
Meadow restoration would occur in various places across
the restoration area, and would be achieved through riparian shrub/
tree/grass/forbs planting along the meadow in the Musselshell
restoration area. Temporary fencing or other protection, such as
tubing, would be installed to keep livestock and wildlife out.
Meadow restoration would be conducted in two phases.
During the first phase, half of the area would be planted and then
protected for 5 years to allow for establishment. After that, the
second phase would be completed. This approach would minimize impacts
to the grazing allotment permittee.
Soil rehabilitation would occur on approximately 55 acres
of currently detrimentally disturbed areas associated with past harvest
related activities. Activities could include decompaction, mastication,
fertilization, seeding, and addition of woody material/organic
material. These 55 acres of soil rehabilitation would be in addition to
the soil rehabilitation associated with the transportation system and
the Musselshell rehabilitation area.
Possible Alternatives: The Forest Service will consider include a
no-action alternative, which will serve as a baseline for comparison of
alternatives. The proposed action will be considered along with
additional alternatives that will be developed to meet the purpose and
need for action, and to address significant issues identified during
scoping.
The Responsible Official: Rick Brazell, Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest
Supervisor, Clearwater National Forest Supervisor's Office, 12730
Highway 12, Orofino, ID 83544.
The Decision To Be Made: Whether to adopt the proposed action, in
whole or in part, or another alternative; and what mitigation measures
and management requirements will be implemented.
The Scoping Process: The scoping process identifies issues to be
analyzed in detail and leads to the development of alternatives to the
proposal. The Forest Service is seeking information and comments from
other Federal, State, and local agencies; Tribal Governments; and
organizations and individuals who may be interested in or affected by
the
[[Page 24721]]
proposed action. Comments received in response to this notice,
including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be a part
of the project record and available for public review.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
will be prepared for comment. The next major opportunity for public
input will be when the DEIS is published. The comment period for the
DEIS will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Draft
EIS is anticipated to be available for public review in February 2014.
Dated: April 15, 2013.
Rick Brazell,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2013-09710 Filed 4-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P