Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oregon: Open Burning and Enforcement Procedures, 24347-24349 [2013-09695]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures, paragraph
311a. This airspace action consists of a
modification of an existing airway and
is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6010(a)—Domestic VOR Federal
Airways
V–595 [Amended]
From Rogue Valley, OR, to Deschutes, OR.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 10,
2013.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2013–09566 Filed 4–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ACTION:
Final rule.
The EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Oregon on
February 16, 2001, July 14, 2005, August
28, 2006, and May 20, 2008 that relate
to open burning rules, enforcement
procedures, civil penalties, and
procedures in contested cases (appeals).
These revisions were made to the
Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR)
Chapter 340, Division 264 (OAR 340–
264), OAR 340–012, and OAR 340–011.
The EPA is approving the SIP revisions
because the revisions clarify and
strengthen the SIP and meet the criteria
of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2008–0903. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics, AWT–107, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin A. Spenillo at (206) 553–6125,
spenillo.justin@epa.gov, or the above
EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
40 CFR Part 52
I. Background
Title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as
amended by Congress in 1990, specifies
the general requirements for states to
submit State Implementation Plans
(SIPs) to attain and maintain the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and the EPA’s actions
[EPA–R10–OAR–2008–0903: FRL–9793–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Oregon: Open
Burning and Enforcement Procedures
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24347
regarding approval of those SIPs. The
EPA is approving the SIP revisions
submitted by the State of Oregon on
February 16, 2001, July 14, 2005, August
28, 2006, and May 20, 2008. These
revisions relate to open burning rules,
enforcement procedures, civil penalties,
and procedures in contested cases
(appeals). On January 7, 2013 (78 FR
918) the EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR), proposing
approval of the revisions. The NPR
includes a detailed description and
analysis of the revisions, and rationale
for this final action. A brief summary is
provided below.
Oregon’s February 16, 2001 submittal
recodifies and revises the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality’s
(ODEQ) open burning regulations, now
codified at OAR 340–264. The EPA
proposed to determine that the revisions
to OAR 340–264 either clarify or do not
affect the overall stringency of the
ODEQ’s open burning regulations, and
that approval of the revisions will not
interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or other
requirements of the CAA as described in
the EPA’s proposed rule.
Oregon’s July 14, 2005, August 28,
2006, and May 20, 2008 SIP submittals
relate to enforcement procedures, civil
penalties, and procedures in contested
cases (appeals). OAR 340–012
Enforcement Procedures and Civil
Penalties contains enforcement
procedures and civil penalty provisions
that apply to the air quality regulations
in the Oregon SIP. The revisions to OAR
340–012 clarify the differences between
formal and informal enforcement
processes, make adjustments to the
penalty matrices, and streamline and
reorganize the rules to more closely
track the ODEQ’s enforcement and
penalty calculation process. The EPA
proposed to find that these revisions
continue to provide the ODEQ with
adequate authority for enforcing the SIP
as required by Section 110 of the CAA
and 40 CFR 51.230(b). OAR 340–011
Rules of General Applicability and
Organization contain procedures in
contested cases (appeals of the ODEQ
actions). The EPA proposed to
determine that these rule revisions
improve the clarity and completeness of
contested case appeals coming before
the Environmental Quality Commission
and provide the authority needed for
implementing the SIP.
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period on the January 7, 2013
(78 FR 918) NPR. No comments were
received on the NPR and the EPA is
now taking final action to approve the
proposed revisions.
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
24348
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving and
incorporating by reference the renumbering of OAR 340–264 to replace
OAR 340–23 and the revisions to
Oregon’s open burning rules, OAR 340–
264, submitted by the ODEQ on
February 16, 2001.
The EPA is approving but not
incorporating by reference the
enforcement provisions in OAR 340–
012 submitted by the ODEQ on July 14,
2005 and August 28, 2006, subject to the
qualifications and in the manner
discussed below. First, where ODEQ
submitted a regulation in Division 12 as
part of its July 14, 2005 submittal and
that regulation was subsequently
revised and submitted as part of ODEQ’s
August 28, 2006 submittal, EPA is
approving the version of the regulation
submitted as part of the August 28, 2006
submittal. The docket contains a chart
showing the version of the regulations
in Division 12 we are approving.
Second, EPA’s authority to approve SIPs
extends to provisions related to
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS and carrying out other specific
requirements of Section 110 of the CAA.
Therefore, EPA is not approving the
following regulations in Division 12 that
do not relate to air emissions: OAR–
340–012–0055, –0060, –0065, –0066,
–0067, –0068, –0071, –0072, –0074,
–0079, –0081, –0083, –0097. In
addition, EPA is approving the
remaining sections in Chapter 340,
Division 12 only to the extent they
relate to enforcement of requirements
contained in the Oregon SIP. Finally,
although the EPA is approving the rules
in Division 12 in the manner discussed
above, the EPA is not incorporating
these rules by reference into the Code of
Federal Regulations because the EPA
relies on its independent enforcement
procedures and penalty provisions in
bringing enforcement actions and
assessing penalties under the CAA.
Finally, the EPA is approving but not
incorporating by reference revisions
related to procedures in contested cases
(that is, appeals from the ODEQ actions)
found at OAR 340–011. These revisions
were submitted by the ODEQ on May
20, 2008. It is not appropriate to
incorporate these rules by reference into
the Code of Federal Regulations because
the EPA relies on its own administrative
and enforcement procedures in
enforcing the CAA.
The EPA is taking no action on the
revisions to OAR 340–200–0040 in each
of the ODEQ’s SIP submittals (February
16, 2001, July 14, 2005, August 28,
2006, and May 20, 2008) because it is
unnecessary to take action on this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
provision addressing State SIP adoption
procedures and because the Federallyapproved SIP consists only of
regulations and other requirements that
have been submitted by the ODEQ and
approved by the EPA.
Finally, the EPA is taking no action
on the expedited enforcement process
set forth in OAR 340–150 –0250
Expedited Enforcement Process for
underground storage tanks included in
the ODEQ’s July 14, 2005 submittal
because this section applies to
underground storage tank regulations
and does not relate to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or other
requirements of section 110 of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to the requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 24, 2013.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 13, 2013.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator. Region 10.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart MM—Oregon
2. Section 52.1970 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(116)(i)(D) and (c)
(156) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1970
Identification of plan.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(116) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Based on a SIP revision submitted
by Oregon on February 16, 2001, Oregon
Administrative Rules Chapter 340,
Division 23 ‘‘Rules for Open Burning,’’
as effective March 10, 1993, is removed
from the SIP.
*
*
*
*
*
(156) On February 16, 2001, May 13,
2005, March 29, 2006, and March 20,
2008, the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality submitted
revisions to the Oregon Administrative
Rules (OAR) Chapter 340 as revisions to
the Oregon State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The submissions relate to
Oregon’s open burning rules,
enforcement procedures, civil penalties,
and procedures in contested cases
(appeals).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) The following sections of the OAR
Chapter 340, Division 264, effective
December 15, 2000: Division 264, Rules
For Open Burning: Rule 0010 How to
Use These Open Burning Rules; Rule
0020 Policy; Rule 0030 Definitions; Rule
0040 Exemptions, Statewide; Rule 0050
General Requirements Statewide; Rule
0060 General Prohibitions Statewide;
Rule 0070 Open Burning Conditions;
Rule 0075 Delegation of Authority; Rule
0078 Open Burning Control Areas; Rule
0080 County Listing of Specific Open
Burning Rules; Rule 0100 Open Burning
Requirements, Baker, Clatsop, Crook,
Curry, Deschutes, Gilliam, Grant,
Harney, Hood River, Jefferson, Klamath,
Lake, Lincoln, Malheur, Morrow,
Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union,
Wallowa, Wasco and Wheeler Counties;
Rule 0110 Open Burning Requirements,
Benton, Linn, Marion, Polk, and
Yamhill Counties; Rule 0120, Open
Burning Requirements, Clackmas
County; Rule 0130, Open Burning
Requirements, Multnomah County; Rule
0140 Open Burning Requirements,
Washington County; Rule 0150 Open
Burning Requirements, Columbia
County; Rule 0160 Open Burning
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
Requirements, Lane County; Rule 0170
Open Burning Requirements, Coos,
Douglas, Jackson and Josephine
Counties; Rule 0180 Open Burning
Requirements, Letter Permits, Rule 0190
Open Burning Requirements, Forced-Air
Pit Incinerators.
(B) [Reserved.]
(ii) Additional Material:
(A) The following revised sections of
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter
340 effective May 13, 2005: Division 12
Enforcement Procedures and Civil
Penalties: Rule 0026 Policy, Rule 0028
Scope of Applicability, Rule 0030
Definitions, Rule 0038 Warning Letters,
Pre-Enforcement Notices and Notices of
Permit Violation, Rule 0041 Formal
Enforcement Action, Rule 0042
Determination of Base Penalty, Rule
0045 Civil Penalty Determination
Procedure, Rule 0145 Determination of
Aggravating or Mitigating Factors, Rule
0150 Determination of Economic
Benefit, Rule 0160 Department
Discretion Regarding Penalty
Assessment, Rule 0162 Inability to Pay
the Penalty, Rule 0165 Stipulated
Penalties, Rule 0170 Compromise or
Settlement of Civil Penalty by
Department.
(B) The following revised sections of
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter
340 effective March 29, 2006: Division
12 Enforcement Procedures and Civil
Penalties: Rule 0027 Rule Effective Date,
Rule 0053 Violations that Apply to all
Programs, Rule 0054 Air Quality
Classification of Violations, Rule 0073
Environmental Cleanup Classification of
Violation, Rule 0082 Contingency
Planning Classification of Violations,
Rule 0130 Determination of Violation
Magnitude, Rule 0135 Selected
Magnitude Categories, Rule 0140
Determination of Base Penalty, Rule
0155 Additional or Alternate Civil
Penalties.
(C) The following revised sections of
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter
340 effective March 20, 2008: Division
11, Rules of General Applicability and
Organization, Rule 0005 Definitions,
Rule 0009 Incorporation of Attorney
General’s Uniform and Model Rules,
Rule 0510 Agency Representation by
Environmental Law Specialist, Rule
0515 Authorized Representative of
Respondent other than a Natural Person
in a Contested Case Hearing, Rule 0573
Proposed Orders in Contested Cases,
Rule 0575 Review of Proposed Orders in
Contested Cases.
24349
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0397; FRL–9383–1]
Bacillus mycoides Isolate J; TimeLimited Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2013–09695 Filed 4–24–13; 8:45 am]
This regulation establishes a
time-limited exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of Bacillus mycoides isolate J in or on
potato, when used in accordance with
the terms of the section 18 emergency
exemption. This action is in response to
EPA’s granting of an emergency
exemption under section 18 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing
use of the pesticide on potato. The timelimited exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance expires on December 31,
2015.
DATES: This regulation is effective April
25, 2013. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
June 24, 2013, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0397, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debra Rate, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 306–0309; email address:
rate.debra@epa.gov.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 80 (Thursday, April 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24347-24349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09695]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0903: FRL-9793-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oregon: Open
Burning and Enforcement Procedures
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Oregon on February 16, 2001, July 14, 2005,
August 28, 2006, and May 20, 2008 that relate to open burning rules,
enforcement procedures, civil penalties, and procedures in contested
cases (appeals). These revisions were made to the Oregon Administrative
Rules (OAR) Chapter 340, Division 264 (OAR 340-264), OAR 340-012, and
OAR 340-011. The EPA is approving the SIP revisions because the
revisions clarify and strengthen the SIP and meet the criteria of the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective on May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0903. All documents in the docket are
listed in the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information may not be publicly available,
i.e., confidential business information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics, AWT-107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin A. Spenillo at (206) 553-6125,
spenillo.justin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' are used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background
Title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended by Congress in 1990,
specifies the general requirements for states to submit State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) to attain and maintain the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the EPA's actions regarding approval
of those SIPs. The EPA is approving the SIP revisions submitted by the
State of Oregon on February 16, 2001, July 14, 2005, August 28, 2006,
and May 20, 2008. These revisions relate to open burning rules,
enforcement procedures, civil penalties, and procedures in contested
cases (appeals). On January 7, 2013 (78 FR 918) the EPA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR), proposing approval of the
revisions. The NPR includes a detailed description and analysis of the
revisions, and rationale for this final action. A brief summary is
provided below.
Oregon's February 16, 2001 submittal recodifies and revises the
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality's (ODEQ) open burning
regulations, now codified at OAR 340-264. The EPA proposed to determine
that the revisions to OAR 340-264 either clarify or do not affect the
overall stringency of the ODEQ's open burning regulations, and that
approval of the revisions will not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or other requirements of the CAA as described
in the EPA's proposed rule.
Oregon's July 14, 2005, August 28, 2006, and May 20, 2008 SIP
submittals relate to enforcement procedures, civil penalties, and
procedures in contested cases (appeals). OAR 340-012 Enforcement
Procedures and Civil Penalties contains enforcement procedures and
civil penalty provisions that apply to the air quality regulations in
the Oregon SIP. The revisions to OAR 340-012 clarify the differences
between formal and informal enforcement processes, make adjustments to
the penalty matrices, and streamline and reorganize the rules to more
closely track the ODEQ's enforcement and penalty calculation process.
The EPA proposed to find that these revisions continue to provide the
ODEQ with adequate authority for enforcing the SIP as required by
Section 110 of the CAA and 40 CFR 51.230(b). OAR 340-011 Rules of
General Applicability and Organization contain procedures in contested
cases (appeals of the ODEQ actions). The EPA proposed to determine that
these rule revisions improve the clarity and completeness of contested
case appeals coming before the Environmental Quality Commission and
provide the authority needed for implementing the SIP.
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period on the January 7,
2013 (78 FR 918) NPR. No comments were received on the NPR and the EPA
is now taking final action to approve the proposed revisions.
[[Page 24348]]
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving and incorporating by reference the re-
numbering of OAR 340-264 to replace OAR 340-23 and the revisions to
Oregon's open burning rules, OAR 340-264, submitted by the ODEQ on
February 16, 2001.
The EPA is approving but not incorporating by reference the
enforcement provisions in OAR 340-012 submitted by the ODEQ on July 14,
2005 and August 28, 2006, subject to the qualifications and in the
manner discussed below. First, where ODEQ submitted a regulation in
Division 12 as part of its July 14, 2005 submittal and that regulation
was subsequently revised and submitted as part of ODEQ's August 28,
2006 submittal, EPA is approving the version of the regulation
submitted as part of the August 28, 2006 submittal. The docket contains
a chart showing the version of the regulations in Division 12 we are
approving. Second, EPA's authority to approve SIPs extends to
provisions related to attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS and
carrying out other specific requirements of Section 110 of the CAA.
Therefore, EPA is not approving the following regulations in Division
12 that do not relate to air emissions: OAR-340-012-0055, -0060, -0065,
-0066, -0067, -0068, -0071, -0072, -0074, -0079, -0081, -0083, -0097.
In addition, EPA is approving the remaining sections in Chapter 340,
Division 12 only to the extent they relate to enforcement of
requirements contained in the Oregon SIP. Finally, although the EPA is
approving the rules in Division 12 in the manner discussed above, the
EPA is not incorporating these rules by reference into the Code of
Federal Regulations because the EPA relies on its independent
enforcement procedures and penalty provisions in bringing enforcement
actions and assessing penalties under the CAA.
Finally, the EPA is approving but not incorporating by reference
revisions related to procedures in contested cases (that is, appeals
from the ODEQ actions) found at OAR 340-011. These revisions were
submitted by the ODEQ on May 20, 2008. It is not appropriate to
incorporate these rules by reference into the Code of Federal
Regulations because the EPA relies on its own administrative and
enforcement procedures in enforcing the CAA.
The EPA is taking no action on the revisions to OAR 340-200-0040 in
each of the ODEQ's SIP submittals (February 16, 2001, July 14, 2005,
August 28, 2006, and May 20, 2008) because it is unnecessary to take
action on this provision addressing State SIP adoption procedures and
because the Federally-approved SIP consists only of regulations and
other requirements that have been submitted by the ODEQ and approved by
the EPA.
Finally, the EPA is taking no action on the expedited enforcement
process set forth in OAR 340-150 -0250 Expedited Enforcement Process
for underground storage tanks included in the ODEQ's July 14, 2005
submittal because this section applies to underground storage tank
regulations and does not relate to attainment or maintenance of the
NAAQS or other requirements of section 110 of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to the requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 24, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 13, 2013.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator. Region 10.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
[[Page 24349]]
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart MM--Oregon
0
2. Section 52.1970 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(116)(i)(D) and
(c) (156) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1970 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(116) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Based on a SIP revision submitted by Oregon on February 16,
2001, Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 340, Division 23 ``Rules for
Open Burning,'' as effective March 10, 1993, is removed from the SIP.
* * * * *
(156) On February 16, 2001, May 13, 2005, March 29, 2006, and March
20, 2008, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality submitted
revisions to the Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter 340 as
revisions to the Oregon State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
submissions relate to Oregon's open burning rules, enforcement
procedures, civil penalties, and procedures in contested cases
(appeals).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) The following sections of the OAR Chapter 340, Division 264,
effective December 15, 2000: Division 264, Rules For Open Burning: Rule
0010 How to Use These Open Burning Rules; Rule 0020 Policy; Rule 0030
Definitions; Rule 0040 Exemptions, Statewide; Rule 0050 General
Requirements Statewide; Rule 0060 General Prohibitions Statewide; Rule
0070 Open Burning Conditions; Rule 0075 Delegation of Authority; Rule
0078 Open Burning Control Areas; Rule 0080 County Listing of Specific
Open Burning Rules; Rule 0100 Open Burning Requirements, Baker,
Clatsop, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Hood River,
Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Lincoln, Malheur, Morrow, Sherman, Tillamook,
Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco and Wheeler Counties; Rule 0110 Open
Burning Requirements, Benton, Linn, Marion, Polk, and Yamhill Counties;
Rule 0120, Open Burning Requirements, Clackmas County; Rule 0130, Open
Burning Requirements, Multnomah County; Rule 0140 Open Burning
Requirements, Washington County; Rule 0150 Open Burning Requirements,
Columbia County; Rule 0160 Open Burning Requirements, Lane County; Rule
0170 Open Burning Requirements, Coos, Douglas, Jackson and Josephine
Counties; Rule 0180 Open Burning Requirements, Letter Permits, Rule
0190 Open Burning Requirements, Forced-Air Pit Incinerators.
(B) [Reserved.]
(ii) Additional Material:
(A) The following revised sections of Oregon Administrative Rules
Chapter 340 effective May 13, 2005: Division 12 Enforcement Procedures
and Civil Penalties: Rule 0026 Policy, Rule 0028 Scope of
Applicability, Rule 0030 Definitions, Rule 0038 Warning Letters, Pre-
Enforcement Notices and Notices of Permit Violation, Rule 0041 Formal
Enforcement Action, Rule 0042 Determination of Base Penalty, Rule 0045
Civil Penalty Determination Procedure, Rule 0145 Determination of
Aggravating or Mitigating Factors, Rule 0150 Determination of Economic
Benefit, Rule 0160 Department Discretion Regarding Penalty Assessment,
Rule 0162 Inability to Pay the Penalty, Rule 0165 Stipulated Penalties,
Rule 0170 Compromise or Settlement of Civil Penalty by Department.
(B) The following revised sections of Oregon Administrative Rules
Chapter 340 effective March 29, 2006: Division 12 Enforcement
Procedures and Civil Penalties: Rule 0027 Rule Effective Date, Rule
0053 Violations that Apply to all Programs, Rule 0054 Air Quality
Classification of Violations, Rule 0073 Environmental Cleanup
Classification of Violation, Rule 0082 Contingency Planning
Classification of Violations, Rule 0130 Determination of Violation
Magnitude, Rule 0135 Selected Magnitude Categories, Rule 0140
Determination of Base Penalty, Rule 0155 Additional or Alternate Civil
Penalties.
(C) The following revised sections of Oregon Administrative Rules
Chapter 340 effective March 20, 2008: Division 11, Rules of General
Applicability and Organization, Rule 0005 Definitions, Rule 0009
Incorporation of Attorney General's Uniform and Model Rules, Rule 0510
Agency Representation by Environmental Law Specialist, Rule 0515
Authorized Representative of Respondent other than a Natural Person in
a Contested Case Hearing, Rule 0573 Proposed Orders in Contested Cases,
Rule 0575 Review of Proposed Orders in Contested Cases.
[FR Doc. 2013-09695 Filed 4-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P