Airworthiness Directives; Kelowna Flightcraft R & D Ltd. Airplanes, 24340-24343 [2013-08987]
Download as PDF
24340
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
21, 2011, as revised by Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1312, Revision 1, dated
March 14, 2012, except as required by
paragraph (k) of this AD: Do an external
detailed inspection and an external
nondestructive inspection (a medium
frequency eddy current (MFEC), magneto
optic imager (MOI), C-scan, or ultrasonic
phased array (UTPA) inspection) for cracking
in the fuselage skin along the chem-mill steps
at certain locations specified in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
53–1312, dated October 21, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312,
Revision 1, dated March 14, 2012. Repeat the
inspections thereafter at the applicable times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, dated
October 21, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, Revision 1,
dated March 14, 2012.
(h) Inspections of Shear Wrinkle Areas
For Group 1 airplanes as identified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, dated
October 21, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, Revision 1,
dated March 14, 2012: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, dated
October 21, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, Revision 1,
dated March 14, 2012, except as required by
paragraph (k) of this AD, do an external
detailed inspection and an external
nondestructive inspection (MFEC, MOI, Cscan, or UTPA) for cracking in the fuselage
skin along the chem-mill steps at certain
shear wrinkle locations specified in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
53–1312, dated October 21, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312,
Revision 1, dated March 14, 2012. Repeat the
inspections thereafter at the applicable times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, dated
October 21, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, Revision 1,
dated March 14, 2012.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(i) Repair
If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by either paragraph (g) or
(h) of this AD, before further flight, repair the
cracking using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (m) of this AD. Accomplishing the
repair approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this
AD terminates the repetitive inspection
requirement for that area under the repair
only.
(j) Optional Terminating Modification
Modification of an inspection area
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
including doing an external detailed
inspection and an external nondestructive
inspection (MFEC, MOI, C-scan, or UTPA) for
cracking of the area to be modified, and a
high frequency eddy current inspection of all
existing holes for cracking as applicable, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
53–1312, dated October 21, 2011, as revised
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
by Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312,
Revision 1, dated March 14, 2012, terminates
the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (g) of this AD for that modified
area only. If any cracking is found during any
inspection described by this paragraph,
before further flight, repair the cracking using
a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this
AD.
(k) Service Bulletin Exception
Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312,
dated October 21, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1312, Revision 1,
dated March 14, 2012, specifies compliance
times ‘‘after the original issue date of this
service bulletin.’’ However, this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance
times ‘‘after the effective date of this AD.’’
(l) Post-Modification Inspections
The post-modification inspections
specified in Tables 3 and 4 of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service Bulletin
737–53–1312, dated October 21, 2011, as
revised by Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–
1312, Revision 1, dated March 14, 2012, are
not required by this AD.
Note 1 to paragraph (l) of this AD: The
damage tolerance inspections specified in
Tables 3 and 4 of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service Bulletin
737–53–1312, dated October 21, 2011, as
revised by Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–
1312, Revision 1, dated March 14, 2012, may
be used in support of compliance with
section 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). The
actions specified in Part 5 of the
Accomplishment Instructions and
corresponding figures of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1312, dated October 21,
2011, as revised by Boeing Service Bulletin
737–53–1312, Revision 1, dated March 14,
2012, are not required by this AD.
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(n) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
phone: (425) 917–6447; fax: (425) 917–6590;
email: Wayne.Lockett@faa.gov.
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312,
dated October 21, 2011.
(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1312,
Revision 1, dated March 14, 2012.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 4,
2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08996 Filed 4–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0330; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–051–AD; Amendment
39–17427; AD 2013–08–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Kelowna
Flightcraft R & D Ltd. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Tracor (Convair) Model 340 and 440
airplanes and certain Military Model C–
131B, C–131D, C–131E, and C131F/
R4Y–1 airplanes. This AD requires
repetitive inspections of the lower skin
of the wings for cracking around the
inboard side of the wing station (WS) 6
and 7 access panel doubler fingers and
between stringers 5 and 11; repetitive
inspections of the lower skin of the
wings for cracking around stringers 6, 8,
and 10, and around the WS 6 and WS
7 access panel doubler fingers; and
repair if necessary. This AD was
prompted by a report of a crack found
on the lower skin of the right-hand wing
between WS 5 and WS 6. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the lower skin of the wings,
which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the wings.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May
10, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of May 10, 2013.
We must receive comments on this
AD by June 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Zimmer, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone (516) 228–7306;
fax (516) 794–5531; email:
jeffrey.zimmer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Emergency Airworthiness Directive CF–
2013–04, dated February 14, 2013
(referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
While performing a corrosion inspection of
the wing internal structures, an operator
discovered a crack of significant length
between Wing Station (WS) 5 and 6, on the
right hand wing lower skin of a Convair 580
aeroplane. Although an investigation is still
ongoing to determine the cause, the crack
appears to originate from a fastener located
at the wing skin to wing access door doubler
attachment.
Previous repetitive external inspections of
the wing lower skin in accordance with
Structurally Significant Detail (SSD) 57–1–4,
that was mandated by FAA AD 92–06–06,
[Amendment 39–8186 (57 FR 9382, March
18, 1992)], did not detect the crack because
the location of the crack is covered by the
nacelle drag angle.
Cracking of the wing lower skin at a fatigue
critical area, if not detected, could
compromise the structural integrity of the
wing. This [TCCA] AD mandates internal
visual and eddy current inspections to detect
cracking of the wing lower skin to mitigate
this unsafe condition. Transport Canada may
mandate additional corrective actions [repair]
pending the outcome of the failure
investigation and fleet findings.
The visual and eddy current inspections
mandated by this [TCCA] AD are considered
as Alternative Means of Compliance (AMOC)
to the SSD 57–1–4 inspection that was
mandated by FAA AD 92–06–06, for the
locations addressed by the visual and eddy
current inspections.
Corrective action includes repairing any
cracking of the lower skin of the wings.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Kelowna Flightcraft Ltd. has issued
Service Bulletin 340–57–001, dated
February 12, 2013. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24341
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are issuing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between the AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
The MCAI and Kelowna Flightcraft
Service Bulletin 340–57–001, dated
February 12, 2013, specify that
operators with a damage rate factor
(DRF) must divide 1,000 flight hours by
their DRF to get the repetitive
inspection interval. However, there are
no U.S.-registered airplanes that have a
DRF; therefore, this AD requires that the
repetitive inspections be done at
intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight
hours.
The MCAI and Kelowna Flightcraft
Service Bulletin 340–57–001, dated
February 12, 2013, do not contain
instructions to repair certain cracking
conditions; however, this AD requires
repairing those conditions using a
method approved by either the Manager,
New York Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or TCCA (or its delegated
agent).
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD. The FAA has found that the risk to
the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule based on the manufacturer’s
engineering analysis of the structural
failure condition and flight hours/cycles
on the affected fleet, which showed that
certain areas of the lower skin of the
wings must be inspected for fatigue
cracking. Such fatigue cracking could
result in reduced structural integrity of
the wings. Therefore, we determined
that notice and opportunity for public
comment before issuing this AD are
impracticable and that good cause exists
for making this amendment effective in
fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not precede it by notice and
opportunity for public comment. We
invite you to send any written relevant
data, views, or arguments about this AD.
Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2013–0330;
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
24342
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–051–
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
70 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 6 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $35,700, or $510 per product.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2013–08–10 Kelowna Flightcraft R & D
Ltd.: Amendment 39–17427. Docket
No. FAA–2013–0330; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–051–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective May 10, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Tracor (Convair) Model
340 and 440 airplanes, including airplanes
modified by Supplemental Type Certificates
(STC) SA1096WE https://rgl.faa.gov/
Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/
0/BAB5BE3241FF1FD085256CC
10080DDDC?OpenDocument&
Highlight=sa1096we (commonly referred to
as Model 640 airplanes), STC SA6088NM
https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_
Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
BEFFE27E85EAFF918625771
4007C8B4B?OpenDocument&
Highlight=sa6088nm (commonly referred to
as Model 5800 airplanes), and STC SA4–1100
https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_
Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
AFD81364EE6A3EAC85256C
C2000C5CC2?OpenDocument&
Highlight=sa4-1100 (commonly referred to as
Model 580 airplanes) and Military Model C–
131B, C–131D, C–131E, and C131F/R4Y–1
airplanes; certificated in any category.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of a
crack found on the lower skin of the righthand (RH) wing between wing station (WS)
5 and 6. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking of the lower skin of
the wings, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the wings.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Repetitive Detailed Inspections
Within 20 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD: Do a one-time detailed
inspection for cracking of the lower skin of
the left-hand (LH) and RH wings around the
inboard side of the WS 6 and WS 7 access
panel doubler fingers and between stringers
5 and 11, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Kelowna
Flightcraft Service Bulletin 340–57–001,
dated February 12, 2013. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 1,000 flight hours.
(h) Repetitive Eddy Current Inspections
Within 100 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD: Do an eddy current
inspection for cracking of the lower skin of
the LH and RH wings for cracking around
stringers 6, 8, and 10, and around the WS 6
and WS 7 access panel doubler fingers, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Kelowna Flightcraft Service
Bulletin 340–57–001, dated February 12,
2013. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight hours.
(i) Repair
If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) or (h) of
this AD: Before further flight, repair using a
method approved by either the Manager,
New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) (or its delegated agent).
(j) Method of Compliance
The inspections required by this AD are
approved as a method of compliance to the
structurally significant detail (SSD) 57–1–4
inspection required by AD 92–06–06,
Amendment 39–8186 (57 FR 9382, March 18,
1992), for only the locations addressed by the
detailed and eddy current inspections
specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
Inspections at all other locations addressed
by SSD 57–1–4 remain applicable.
(k) Reporting
Submit a report of the findings (both
positive and negative) of each inspection
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD
to Kelowna Flightcraft Convair Division,
5655 Airport Way, Kelowna, Canada BC, V1V
1S1; telephone (250) 807–5416; fax (250)
765–7140; email
matt_palmberg@flghtcraft.ca; at the
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1)
or (k)(2) of this AD.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the ACO send it to
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax
516–794–5531. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(m) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Emergency Airworthiness Directive CF–
2013–04, dated February 14, 2013; and
Kelowna Flightcraft Service Bulletin 340–57–
001, dated February 12, 2013; for related
information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:12 Apr 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
24343
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Kelowna Flightcraft Service Bulletin
340–57–001, dated February 12, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Kelowna Flightcraft Ltd.,
5655 Airport Way, Kelowna, BC Canada, V1V
1S1; telephone (250) 807–5416; fax (250)
765–7140; Internet https://www.flightcraft.ca/
convair.asp.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
of the brushes on certain P/N A/C
compressor motors or deactivation of
the A/C system until replacement of the
brushes, and reporting of airplane
information related to the replacement
of the brushes. We are issuing this AD
to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective May 30,
2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of May 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Cessna
Aircraft Company, Product Support,
P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277;
telephone: (316) 517–5800; fax: (316)
942–9006; email:
customercare@cessna.textron.com;
Internet: www.cessna.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8,
2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Abraham, Aerospace Engineer,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; phone: (316)
946–4165; fax: (316) 946–4107; email:
christine.abraham@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2013–08987 Filed 4–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0880; Directorate
Identifier 2012–CE–004–AD; Amendment
39–17422; AD 2013–08–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna
Aircraft Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna)
Model 525 airplanes equipped with
certain part number (P/N) air
conditioning (A/C) compressor motors.
This AD was prompted by reports of
smoke and/or fire in the tailcone caused
by brushes wearing beyond their limits
on the A/C motor. This AD requires
inspection of the number of hours on
the A/C compressor hour meter,
inspection of the logbook, replacement
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion
We issued a supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an
airworthiness directive (AD) that would
apply to the specified products. That
SNPRM published in the Federal
Register on December 6, 2012 (77 FR
72778). The original NPRM (77 FR
50644, August 22, 2012) proposed to
require inspection of the number of
hours on the A/C compressor hour
meter, inspection of the logbook, and
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 80 (Thursday, April 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24340-24343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08987]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0330; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-051-AD;
Amendment 39-17427; AD 2013-08-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Kelowna Flightcraft R & D Ltd.
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 24341]]
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Tracor (Convair) Model 340 and 440 airplanes and certain Military Model
C-131B, C-131D, C-131E, and C131F/R4Y-1 airplanes. This AD requires
repetitive inspections of the lower skin of the wings for cracking
around the inboard side of the wing station (WS) 6 and 7 access panel
doubler fingers and between stringers 5 and 11; repetitive inspections
of the lower skin of the wings for cracking around stringers 6, 8, and
10, and around the WS 6 and WS 7 access panel doubler fingers; and
repair if necessary. This AD was prompted by a report of a crack found
on the lower skin of the right-hand wing between WS 5 and WS 6. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the lower
skin of the wings, which could result in reduced structural integrity
of the wings.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May 10, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of May 10, 2013.
We must receive comments on this AD by June 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Zimmer, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone (516) 228-7306; fax (516) 794-5531; email:
jeffrey.zimmer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Emergency Airworthiness
Directive CF-2013-04, dated February 14, 2013 (referred to after this
as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
While performing a corrosion inspection of the wing internal
structures, an operator discovered a crack of significant length
between Wing Station (WS) 5 and 6, on the right hand wing lower skin
of a Convair 580 aeroplane. Although an investigation is still
ongoing to determine the cause, the crack appears to originate from
a fastener located at the wing skin to wing access door doubler
attachment.
Previous repetitive external inspections of the wing lower skin
in accordance with Structurally Significant Detail (SSD) 57-1-4,
that was mandated by FAA AD 92-06-06, [Amendment 39-8186 (57 FR
9382, March 18, 1992)], did not detect the crack because the
location of the crack is covered by the nacelle drag angle.
Cracking of the wing lower skin at a fatigue critical area, if
not detected, could compromise the structural integrity of the wing.
This [TCCA] AD mandates internal visual and eddy current inspections
to detect cracking of the wing lower skin to mitigate this unsafe
condition. Transport Canada may mandate additional corrective
actions [repair] pending the outcome of the failure investigation
and fleet findings.
The visual and eddy current inspections mandated by this [TCCA] AD
are considered as Alternative Means of Compliance (AMOC) to the SSD
57-1-4 inspection that was mandated by FAA AD 92-06-06, for the
locations addressed by the visual and eddy current inspections.
Corrective action includes repairing any cracking of the lower skin of
the wings. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Kelowna Flightcraft Ltd. has issued Service Bulletin 340-57-001,
dated February 12, 2013. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information
The MCAI and Kelowna Flightcraft Service Bulletin 340-57-001, dated
February 12, 2013, specify that operators with a damage rate factor
(DRF) must divide 1,000 flight hours by their DRF to get the repetitive
inspection interval. However, there are no U.S.-registered airplanes
that have a DRF; therefore, this AD requires that the repetitive
inspections be done at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight hours.
The MCAI and Kelowna Flightcraft Service Bulletin 340-57-001, dated
February 12, 2013, do not contain instructions to repair certain
cracking conditions; however, this AD requires repairing those
conditions using a method approved by either the Manager, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or TCCA (or its delegated
agent).
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule based on the
manufacturer's engineering analysis of the structural failure condition
and flight hours/cycles on the affected fleet, which showed that
certain areas of the lower skin of the wings must be inspected for
fatigue cracking. Such fatigue cracking could result in reduced
structural integrity of the wings. Therefore, we determined that notice
and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0330;
[[Page 24342]]
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-051-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 70 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $35,700, or $510 per product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2013-08-10 Kelowna Flightcraft R & D Ltd.: Amendment 39-17427.
Docket No. FAA-2013-0330; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-051-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 10,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Tracor (Convair) Model 340 and 440 airplanes,
including airplanes modified by Supplemental Type Certificates (STC)
SA1096WE https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/BAB5BE3241FF1FD085256CC10080DDDC?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa1096we
(commonly referred to as Model 640 airplanes), STC SA6088NM https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/BEFFE27E85EAFF9186257714007C8B4B?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa6088nm
(commonly referred to as Model 5800 airplanes), and STC SA4-1100
https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/AFD81364EE6A3EAC85256CC2000C5CC2?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa4-1100
(commonly referred to as Model 580 airplanes) and Military Model C-
131B, C-131D, C-131E, and C131F/R4Y-1 airplanes; certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of a crack found on the lower
skin of the right-hand (RH) wing between wing station (WS) 5 and 6.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the
lower skin of the wings, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the wings.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Repetitive Detailed Inspections
Within 20 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Do a
one-time detailed inspection for cracking of the lower skin of the
left-hand (LH) and RH wings around the inboard side of the WS 6 and
WS 7 access panel doubler fingers and between stringers 5 and 11, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Kelowna
Flightcraft Service Bulletin 340-57-001, dated February 12, 2013.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000
flight hours.
(h) Repetitive Eddy Current Inspections
Within 100 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Do
an eddy current inspection for cracking of the lower skin of the LH
and RH wings for cracking around stringers 6, 8, and 10, and around
the WS 6 and WS 7 access panel doubler fingers, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Kelowna Flightcraft Service
Bulletin 340-57-001, dated February 12, 2013. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight hours.
(i) Repair
If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD: Before further flight, repair using
a method approved by either the Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) (or its delegated agent).
(j) Method of Compliance
The inspections required by this AD are approved as a method of
compliance to the structurally significant detail (SSD) 57-1-4
inspection required by AD 92-06-06, Amendment 39-8186 (57 FR 9382,
March 18, 1992), for only the locations addressed by the detailed
and eddy current inspections specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD. Inspections at all other locations addressed by SSD 57-1-4
remain applicable.
(k) Reporting
Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative) of
each inspection required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD to
Kelowna Flightcraft Convair Division, 5655 Airport Way, Kelowna,
Canada BC, V1V 1S1; telephone (250) 807-5416; fax (250) 765-7140;
email matt_palmberg@flghtcraft.ca; at the
[[Page 24343]]
applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the ACO send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax
516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
(m) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
Canadian Emergency Airworthiness Directive CF-2013-04, dated
February 14, 2013; and Kelowna Flightcraft Service Bulletin 340-57-
001, dated February 12, 2013; for related information.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Kelowna Flightcraft Service Bulletin 340-57-001, dated
February 12, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Kelowna Flightcraft Ltd., 5655 Airport Way, Kelowna, BC Canada, V1V
1S1; telephone (250) 807-5416; fax (250) 765-7140; Internet https://www.flightcraft.ca/convair.asp.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-08987 Filed 4-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P