Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Lake Andes, SD; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan, 24228-24229 [2013-09657]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24228
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act), rulemaking authority for and
certain enforcement authorities with
respect to the Real Estate Settlement
Procedures Act (RESPA) of 1974, as
amended by Section 461 of the Housing
and Urban-Rural Recovery Act of 1983
(HURRA), and other various
amendments, transferred from the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) to the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) on
July 21, 2011. The Dodd-Frank Act also
directed the CFPB to integrate certain
disclosures required by the Truth in
Lending Act (TILA) with certain
disclosures required by the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) of
1974. The CFPB expects the content and
format of information collection forms
under this clearance, HUD’s existing
HUD–1/1A and GFE forms, to be
significantly revised or replaced by
rulemaking. The CFPB published
proposed rules in July and August of
2012 to that effect.
Historically, in order to satisfy
information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), the HUD–1/1A and GFE listed
HUD’s Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) control number, 2502–
0265. While the CFPB will be, upon
OMB approval of this information
collection request, the ‘‘owner’’ of this
information collection, the CFPB
believes that requiring covered persons
to modify existing forms solely to
replace HUD’s OMB control number
with the Bureau’s OMB control number
would impose substantial burden on
covered persons with limited or no net
benefit to consumers. Accordingly, the
CFPB has reached an agreement with
OMB and HUD whereby covered
persons may continue to list HUD’s
OMB control number on the HUD–1/1A
and GFE forms until a final rule to the
contrary takes effect. Covered persons
also have the option of replacing HUD’s
OMB control number with the Bureau’s
OMB control number on the HUD–1/1A
and GFE forms until a final rule to the
contrary takes effect. Once the CFPB’s
final rule takes effect, regulated industry
will no longer be able to use the HUD
control number.
Agency form numbers, if applicable:
HUD–1 and HUD–1A, and GFE.
Estimation of the total numbers of
hours needed to prepare the information
collection including number of
respondents, frequency of response, and
hours of response: The total number of
annual burden hours needed to prepare
the information is 17,183,450; the
number of respondents is estimated to
be 50,000 generating approximately
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
149,589,500 responses annually; these
are third party disclosures, the
frequency of response is annually for
one disclosure and as required for
others; and the estimated time per
response varies from 2 minutes to 35
minutes.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended.
Status of the proposed information
collection: This is an extension of a
currently approved collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended.
Dated: April 19, 2013.
Laura M. Marin,
Acting General Deputy Assistant, Secretary
for Housing-Acting General Deputy, Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2013–09705 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R6–R–2013–N061; FF06R06000 134
FXRS1265066CCP0]
Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, Lake Andes, SD; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce
that our final comprehensive
conservation plan and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) for the Lake
Andes National Wildlife Refuge
Complex (Complex), which includes
Lake Andes NWR, Karl E. Mundt NWR,
and Lake Andes Wetland Management
District, is available. This final plan
describes how the Service intends to
manage these units for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the plan may be
obtained by any of the following
methods. You may request hard copies
or a CD–ROM of the plan.
• Email: bernardo_garza@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Lake Andes NWR Complex
Draft CCP and EA’’ in the subject line
of the message.
• Fax: Attn: Bernardo Garza, 303–
236–4792.
• U.S. Mail: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Division of Refuge Planning,
P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Center,
Denver, CO 80225.
• In-Person Pickup: Call 303–236–
4377 to make an appointment during
regular business hours at 134 Union
Boulevard, Suite 300, Lakewood, CO
80228.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bernardo Garza, 303–236–4377,
(phone); bernardo_garza@fws.gov
(email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The Complex encompasses three
distinct units: Lake Andes National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Lake Andes
Wetland Management District (WMD),
and Karl E. Mundt NWR. The Complex
lies within the Plains and Prairie
Potholes Region (Region) in South
Dakota, which is an ecological treasure
of biological importance for wildlife,
particularly waterfowl and other
migratory birds. This Region alone
produces approximately 50 percent of
the continent’s waterfowl population.
Hunting and wildlife observation are the
two most prevalent public uses on the
Complex.
Lake Andes NWR was authorized by
an Executive Order in 1936, and
formally established in 1939, to preserve
an important piece of shallow-water and
prairie habitats for waterfowl and other
water birds.
Lake Andes WMD was formed in the
1960s to protect wetland and grassland
habitat that is critical to our nation’s
duck population. The Complex manages
lands located within Aurora, Bon
Homme, Brule, Charles Mix, Clay,
Davison, Douglas, Hanson, Hutchinson,
Lincoln, Turner, Union and Yankton
Counties in southeastern South Dakota.
These lands include a variety of
grassland.
Karl E. Mundt NWR was established
in 1974 to protect an area hugging the
eastern bank of the Missouri River in
Gregory County, South Dakota, and
Boyd County, Nebraska, that was
supporting nearly 300 endangered bald
eagles each winter. It is the first national
wildlife refuge specifically established
for the conservation of bald eagles, and
its riparian forests, prairie, and upland
habitats provide important resting,
feeding, breeding, and nesting sites for
a wide array of neotropical migratory
birds, indigenous turkey, and whitetailed deer. Haying, grazing, prescribed
burning, invasive plant control, and
prairie restoration are used to maintain
riparian and upland habitats.
Cottonwoods and other native tree
species have been planted in the past to
anchor riverine banks in attempts to
safeguard important bald eagle roosting
sites.
The draft Plan and Environmental
Assessment (EA) was made available to
the public for review and comment
following the announcement in the
Federal Register on October 29, 2012
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
(77 FR 65574). The public was given 30
days to comment. Six individuals and
groups provided comments, and
appropriate changes were made to the
final Plan based on substantive
comments. The draft Plan and
Environmental Assessment identified
and evaluated four alternatives for
managing the refuge complex for the
next 15 years. Alternative B (the
proposed action submitted by the
planning team) was selected by the
Regional Director as the preferred
alternative, and will serve as the final
Plan.
The final Plan identifies goals,
objectives, and strategies that describe
the future management of all three units
of the Lake Andes National Wildlife
Refuge Complex. Alternative B, the
preferred alternative, acknowledges the
importance of naturally functioning
ecological communities on the refuge.
However, changes to the landscape (e.g.,
human alterations to the landscape and
past refuge management that created
wetlands) prevent managing the refuge
solely as a naturally functioning
ecological community. Because some of
these changes are significant, some
refuge habitats will require ‘‘hands-on’’
management actions during the life of
this Plan, while others will be restored.
Refuge habitats will continue to be
managed utilizing prescriptive cattle
grazing, prescribed fire, and a
combination of cropping and native
vegetation seeding to restore native
prairie. Management of the refuge
complex will emphasize developing and
implementing an improved, sciencebased priority system to restore prairie
habitats for the benefit of waterfowl,
State and federally listed species,
migratory birds, and other native
wildlife.
The refuge complex staff will focus on
high-priority lands and, when possible,
on lower-priority parcels. The focus is
to restore ecological processes and
native grassland species to the greatest
extent possible within the parameters of
available resources and existing
constraints. The staff of the refuge
complex staff will maintain and in some
cases expand the existing levels and
quality of hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation programs. The refuge
complex staff will continue to work
with local groups and agencies to
improve the quality, and augment the
quantity of Lake Andes’ water. The
refuge complex staff will continue to
work with the Corps of Engineers and
National Park Service local staffs to
ensure protection of bald eagle and
other migratory bird roosting and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
nesting sites from erosion along the
banks of the Missouri River in the Karl
E. Mundt National Wildlife Refuge.
Mechanical, biological, and chemical
treatments will be used to control
invasive plant species. Monitoring and
documenting the response to
management actions will be greatly
expanded. Additional habitat and
wildlife objectives will be clearly stated
in step down management plans to be
completed as this plan is implemented.
The Service is furnishing this notice
to advise other agencies and the public
of the availability of the final Plan, to
provide information on the desired
conditions for the refuge, and to detail
how the Service will implement
management strategies. Based on the
review and evaluation of the
information contained in the EA, the
Regional Director has determined that
implementation of the Final Plan does
not constitute a major Federal action
that would significantly affect the
quality of the human environment
within the meaning of Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act. Therefore, an Environmental
Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Dated: March 28, 2013.
Matt Hogan,
Deputy Regional Director, Mountain-Prairie
Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–09657 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[134A2100DD.AAK4004601.A0N5A2020]
Renewal of Agency Information
Collection for Grazing Permits
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of request for comments.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Bureau of Indian Affairs is seeking
comments on the renewal of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for the collection of
information for Grazing Permits
authorized by OMB Control Number
1076–0157. This information collection
expires July 31, 2013.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
June 24, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the information collection to David
Edington, Office of Trust Services, 1849
C Street NW., Mail Stop 4637 MIB,
Washington, DC 20240; facsimile: (202)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24229
219–0006; email:
David.Edington@bia.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Edington, (202) 513–0886.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is
seeking renewal of the approval for the
information collection conducted under
25 CFR 166, Grazing Permits, related to
grazing on tribal land, individuallyowned Indian land, or government land.
This information collection allows BIA
to obtain the information necessary to
determine whether an applicant is
eligible to acquire, modify, or assign a
grazing permit on trust or restricted
lands and to allow a successful
applicant to meet bonding requirements.
Some of this information is collected on
forms.
II. Request for Comments
The Bureau of Indian Affairs requests
your comments on this collection
concerning: (a) The necessity of this
information collection for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden (hours and cost)
of the collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
collecting information from
respondents.
Please note that an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and an individual
need not respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a valid
OMB Control Number.
It is our policy to make all comments
available to the public for review at the
location listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 1076–0157.
Title: Grazing Permits, 25 CFR 166.
Brief Description of Collection:
Submission of this information allows
individuals or organizations to acquire
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24228-24229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09657]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R6-R-2013-N061; FF06R06000 134 FXRS1265066CCP0]
Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Lake Andes, SD;
Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce
that our final comprehensive conservation plan and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) for the Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge
Complex (Complex), which includes Lake Andes NWR, Karl E. Mundt NWR,
and Lake Andes Wetland Management District, is available. This final
plan describes how the Service intends to manage these units for the
next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the plan may be obtained by any of the following
methods. You may request hard copies or a CD-ROM of the plan.
Email: bernardo_garza@fws.gov. Include ``Lake Andes NWR
Complex Draft CCP and EA'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Bernardo Garza, 303-236-4792.
U.S. Mail: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of
Refuge Planning, P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO
80225.
In-Person Pickup: Call 303-236-4377 to make an appointment
during regular business hours at 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300,
Lakewood, CO 80228.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bernardo Garza, 303-236-4377, (phone);
bernardo_garza@fws.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The Complex encompasses three distinct units: Lake Andes National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Lake Andes Wetland Management District (WMD),
and Karl E. Mundt NWR. The Complex lies within the Plains and Prairie
Potholes Region (Region) in South Dakota, which is an ecological
treasure of biological importance for wildlife, particularly waterfowl
and other migratory birds. This Region alone produces approximately 50
percent of the continent's waterfowl population. Hunting and wildlife
observation are the two most prevalent public uses on the Complex.
Lake Andes NWR was authorized by an Executive Order in 1936, and
formally established in 1939, to preserve an important piece of
shallow-water and prairie habitats for waterfowl and other water birds.
Lake Andes WMD was formed in the 1960s to protect wetland and
grassland habitat that is critical to our nation's duck population. The
Complex manages lands located within Aurora, Bon Homme, Brule, Charles
Mix, Clay, Davison, Douglas, Hanson, Hutchinson, Lincoln, Turner, Union
and Yankton Counties in southeastern South Dakota. These lands include
a variety of grassland.
Karl E. Mundt NWR was established in 1974 to protect an area
hugging the eastern bank of the Missouri River in Gregory County, South
Dakota, and Boyd County, Nebraska, that was supporting nearly 300
endangered bald eagles each winter. It is the first national wildlife
refuge specifically established for the conservation of bald eagles,
and its riparian forests, prairie, and upland habitats provide
important resting, feeding, breeding, and nesting sites for a wide
array of neotropical migratory birds, indigenous turkey, and white-
tailed deer. Haying, grazing, prescribed burning, invasive plant
control, and prairie restoration are used to maintain riparian and
upland habitats. Cottonwoods and other native tree species have been
planted in the past to anchor riverine banks in attempts to safeguard
important bald eagle roosting sites.
The draft Plan and Environmental Assessment (EA) was made available
to the public for review and comment following the announcement in the
Federal Register on October 29, 2012
[[Page 24229]]
(77 FR 65574). The public was given 30 days to comment. Six individuals
and groups provided comments, and appropriate changes were made to the
final Plan based on substantive comments. The draft Plan and
Environmental Assessment identified and evaluated four alternatives for
managing the refuge complex for the next 15 years. Alternative B (the
proposed action submitted by the planning team) was selected by the
Regional Director as the preferred alternative, and will serve as the
final Plan.
The final Plan identifies goals, objectives, and strategies that
describe the future management of all three units of the Lake Andes
National Wildlife Refuge Complex. Alternative B, the preferred
alternative, acknowledges the importance of naturally functioning
ecological communities on the refuge. However, changes to the landscape
(e.g., human alterations to the landscape and past refuge management
that created wetlands) prevent managing the refuge solely as a
naturally functioning ecological community. Because some of these
changes are significant, some refuge habitats will require ``hands-on''
management actions during the life of this Plan, while others will be
restored. Refuge habitats will continue to be managed utilizing
prescriptive cattle grazing, prescribed fire, and a combination of
cropping and native vegetation seeding to restore native prairie.
Management of the refuge complex will emphasize developing and
implementing an improved, science-based priority system to restore
prairie habitats for the benefit of waterfowl, State and federally
listed species, migratory birds, and other native wildlife.
The refuge complex staff will focus on high-priority lands and,
when possible, on lower-priority parcels. The focus is to restore
ecological processes and native grassland species to the greatest
extent possible within the parameters of available resources and
existing constraints. The staff of the refuge complex staff will
maintain and in some cases expand the existing levels and quality of
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, photography, and environmental
education and interpretation programs. The refuge complex staff will
continue to work with local groups and agencies to improve the quality,
and augment the quantity of Lake Andes' water. The refuge complex staff
will continue to work with the Corps of Engineers and National Park
Service local staffs to ensure protection of bald eagle and other
migratory bird roosting and nesting sites from erosion along the banks
of the Missouri River in the Karl E. Mundt National Wildlife Refuge.
Mechanical, biological, and chemical treatments will be used to control
invasive plant species. Monitoring and documenting the response to
management actions will be greatly expanded. Additional habitat and
wildlife objectives will be clearly stated in step down management
plans to be completed as this plan is implemented.
The Service is furnishing this notice to advise other agencies and
the public of the availability of the final Plan, to provide
information on the desired conditions for the refuge, and to detail how
the Service will implement management strategies. Based on the review
and evaluation of the information contained in the EA, the Regional
Director has determined that implementation of the Final Plan does not
constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the
quality of the human environment within the meaning of Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Dated: March 28, 2013.
Matt Hogan,
Deputy Regional Director, Mountain-Prairie Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-09657 Filed 4-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P