Request for Information Regarding Third Party Testing for Lead Content, Phthalate Content, and the Solubility of the Eight Elements Listed in ASTM F963-11, 23918 [C1-2013-08858]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
23918
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Notices
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC 2011–0081]
Request for Information Regarding
Third Party Testing for Lead Content,
Phthalate Content, and the Solubility of
the Eight Elements Listed in ASTM
F963–11
Correction
In notice document 2013–8858
appearing on pages 22518–22520 in the
issue of Tuesday, April 16, 2013, make
the following correction:
On page 22518, in the second column,
in the ADDRESSES section, in the second
and third lines, ‘‘CPSC 2010–0037’’
should read ‘‘CPSC 2011–0081’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2013–08858 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER
SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Submission to OMB for Review and
Approval for Collection of Qualitative
Feedback on Agency Service Delivery;
Public Comment Request
Pretrial Services Agency for the
District of Columbia (PSA), CSOSA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
intention of the Pretrial Services Agency
for the District of Columbia, an
independent entity within the Court
Services and Offender Supervision
Agency (CSOSA) to request that the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project: ‘‘Pretrial
Services Agency for the District of
Columbia 2013 Judicial Survey.’’ In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521,
this notice announces PSA’s intent to
submit this collection to OMB for
approval. PSA invites the public to
comment on this proposed information
collection.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by June 24, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments, identified by ‘‘Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service
Delivery’’ to: Rorey Smith, Deputy
General Counsel and Chief Privacy
Officer, Office of General Counsel, Court
Services and Offender Supervision
Agency, 633 Indiana Avenue NW.,
Room 1380, Washington, DC 20004 or to
Rorey.Smith@csosa.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Comments submitted in response to
this notice may be made available to the
public. For this reason, please do not
include in your comments information
of a confidential nature, such as
sensitive personal information or
proprietary information. If you send an
email comment, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the comment that is placed in
the public docket and may be made
available on the Internet. Please note
that responses to this public comment
request containing any routine notice
about the confidentiality of the
communication will be treated as public
comments that may be made available to
the public notwithstanding the
inclusion of the routine notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rorey Smith, Deputy General Counsel
and Chief Privacy Officer, Office of
General Counsel, Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency, 633
Indiana Avenue NW., Room 1890,
Washington, DC 20004, (202) 220–5797
or to Rorey.Smith@csosa.gov. For
content support: Diane Bradley,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of
General Counsel, Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency, 633
Indiana Avenue NW., Room 1375,
Washington, DC 20004, (202) 220–5364
or to Diane.Bradley@csosa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Pretrial Services Agency for the
District of Columbia 2013 Judicial
Survey.
Abstract: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501–3520), federal agencies must
obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they collect or
sponsor. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA (944 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires
federal agencies to provide a 60-day
notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, before submitting the
collection of information to OMB for
approval. To comply with this
requirement, PSA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
The proposed information collection
activity provides a means to garner
qualitative customer and stakeholder
feedback in an efficient, timely manner,
in accordance with the Administration’s
commitment to improving service
delivery. This feedback will provide
insights into customer or stakeholder
perceptions, experiences and
expectations, provide an early warning
of issues with service, or focus attention
on areas where communication, training
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or changes in operations might improve
delivery of products or services. These
collections will allow for ongoing,
collaborative and actionable
communications between the Agency
and its customers and stakeholders. It
will also allow feedback to contribute
directly to the improvement of program
management.
The judicial officers at the District of
Columbia Superior and District Courts
are one of PSA’s critical customers. The
Agency’s mission statement notes that
‘‘assistance to the courts’’ is critical to
promoting pretrial justice and
community safety. The proposed survey
will assess judicial satisfaction with
PSA’s responsiveness, staff
professionalism, the quality and benefit
of PSA reports, PSA’s supervision of
higher risk defendants (including those
with mental health and substance
dependence issues), and the provision
of treatment services. The judicial
survey will represent the only
qualitative or quantitative measure of
this important metric. PSA will use the
collected information to support several
organizational improvements including:
Enhancements to PSA’s supervision of
medium to higher-risk pretrial
defendants; improve communications
with the Court regarding defendant
compliance and noncompliance with
supervision requirements; provide
better performance ratings of Senior
Executive Services staff; and creation of
a qualitative performance measure to
gauge overall judicial satisfaction under
PSA’s ‘‘partnerships’’ strategic objective.
This type of collection for qualitative
information will be used for quantitative
information collections that are
designed to yield reliable actionable
results, such as monitoring trends over
time or documenting program
performance.
As a general matter, information
collections will not result in any new
system of records containing privacy
information and will not ask questions
of a sensitive nature, such as sexual
behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs,
and other matters that are commonly
considered private.
This evaluation study addresses
PSA’s need for a report to inform
strategic planning for dissemination and
program activities to targeted 60 DC
Superior Court and District Court
judicial officers as survey participants—
the universe of judicial officers hearing
criminal matters in both courts and
those with bail setting duties.
The survey is intended to assess
judicial officers’ perceptions and
attitudes through a structured survey to
measure judicial perceptions and
attitudes about specific elements of
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 23918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-08858]
[[Page 23918]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC 2011-0081]
Request for Information Regarding Third Party Testing for Lead
Content, Phthalate Content, and the Solubility of the Eight Elements
Listed in ASTM F963-11
Correction
In notice document 2013-8858 appearing on pages 22518-22520 in the
issue of Tuesday, April 16, 2013, make the following correction:
On page 22518, in the second column, in the ADDRESSES section, in
the second and third lines, ``CPSC 2010-0037'' should read ``CPSC 2011-
0081''.
[FR Doc. C1-2013-08858 Filed 4-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
