Drawbridge Operation Regulations; North Carolina Cut, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Wrightsville Beach, NC, 23847-23849 [2013-09549]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Ms. Judy LeungYee, Project Officer, First Coast Guard
District, judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil, or
(212) 668–7165. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Route
136 Bridge has a vertical clearance of 6
feet at mean high water in the closed
position. The existing drawbridge
operating regulations are found at 33
CFR 117.221(c).
The bridge owner, Connecticut
Department of Transportation, requested
a 24 hour advance notice requirement
for bridge openings to facilitate
emergency repairs to the mechanical
and electrical components at the bridge.
We previously authorized the above
request from March 5, 2013 through
May 3, 2013; however, an additional 29
days will be necessary in order to finish
storm related repairs from Hurricane
Sandy last October. The bridge can
operate manually in the event of an
emergency situation.
Under this temporary deviation at
least a 24 hour advance notice shall be
required for bridge openings at the
Route 136 Bridge, mile 1.3, across the
Saugatuck River at Westport,
Connecticut, from May 4, 2013 through
June 1, 2013.
The Saugatuck River is predominantly
a recreational waterway. During the
time period that this temporary
deviation will be in effect the impact on
navigation will be minimal.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the bridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated repair period.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0197]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
North Carolina Cut, Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW),
Wrightsville Beach, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2013–09555 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
The Coast Guard is
temporarily changing the operating
schedule that governs the operation of
the S.R. 74 Bridge, at AIWW mile 283.1,
over the North Carolina Cut, at
Wrightsville Beach, NC. This rule
restricts the operation of the draw span
to facilitate the additional unforeseen
structural repair of the bridge. This
change allows the bridge to open on a
two hour advance notification at night
so the necessary repairs may be made
while still providing reasonable needs
of navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective from April
23, 2013 until 7 a.m. on March 1, 2014,
and has been enforced with actual
notice since 7 p.m. on April 16, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–0197. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Mr. Jim Rousseau,
Bridge Management Specialist, Coast
Guard, telephone (757) 398–6422, email
James.L.Rousseau2@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on reviewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Table of Acronyms
Dated: April 10, 2013.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
SUMMARY:
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23847
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard published a
temporary deviation (77 FR 64411) on
October 22, 2012, which allowed the
bridge to operate under a restricted
schedule until March 15, 2013, so
structural repairs could be made to the
bridge. The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. The Coast Guard did not
learn of the severity of the bridge
damage and necessity of the repairs
until after the previous deviation period
ended. The repairs that are the subject
of this regulation need to be undertaken
as soon as possible to ensure safe use of
the bridge.
On March 22, 2013, the Coast Guard
received a letter from the bridge owner
identifying additional structural
problems with the bridge that would
require work to continue under an
altered bridge operating schedule. After
coordination with the bridge owner and
contractor, the Coast Guard established
a maintenance schedule. The necessary
repairs are more extensive and will
require a longer alteration period from
the bridge schedule. As of the effective
date, emergency work will be ongoing at
the bridge in accordance with the
schedule set forth in this document.
Forgoing notice and comment will
minimize disruption to the work already
underway, provide for the reasonable
needs of navigation, and allow for an
efficient course of repairs in order to
eventually return this bridge to its
regular operating schedule, and thus,
any delay is impracticable.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same
reasons as discussed above, the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The North Carolina Department of
Transportation, which owns and
operates this bascule lift bridge, has
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
23848
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
requested a temporary change to the
existing operating regulations set out in
33 CFR 117.821 (a)(4), to facilitate the
additional emergency structural repair
of the bridge. The current operating
schedule opens on the hour from 7 a.m.
to 7 p.m. and on demand during the rest
of the day.
The S.R. 74 Bridge, at AIWW mile
283.1, over the North Carolina Cut, at
Wrightsville Beach, NC has unlimited
vertical clearances in the open position
and closed position of 20 feet above
mean high water respectively.
The Coast Guard initially published a
temporary deviation (77 FR 64411) on
October 22, 2012, which allowed the
bridge to operate under a restricted
schedule until March 15, 2013, to
accommodate for repair. However, the
repairs are more extensive than initially
contemplated and were not discovered
until the end of the project. A contract
extension was granted and a formal
request to continue work by letter was
received on March 22, 2013. Therefore,
in order to facilitate the required
additional repair work and to minimize
the impact on navigation, from April 16,
2013, to March 1, 2014, the bridge shall
open providing 2-hour advance notice
during the evening and early morning
hours when impact to navigation will be
the least. The temporary final rule is
needed to complete extensive work on
the bridge.
Vessel traffic along this part of the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway consists
of commercial and pleasure craft
including sail boats, fishing boats, and
tug and barge traffic that transit mainly
during the daylight hours with the
occasional recreational and commercial
fishing vessel traffic at night. There are
fewer openings at night for mariners,
making it a more suitable time to restrict
the operation of the drawbridge. There
are no alternate routes for vessels
transiting this section of the North
Carolina.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. Discussion of Temporary Final Rule
Under this temporary final rule the
Coast Guard is temporarily revising the
operating regulations at 33 CFR 117.821
by suspending the current regulation
listed at 33 CFR 117.821(a)(4) and
adding the revised regulation at 33 CFR
117.821(a)(6). The regulation will now
read that between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., the
draw need only open on the hour and
from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. need not open,
except with a two hour advance notice.
The remainder of 33 CFR 117.821 will
remain unchanged. This temporary final
rule is necessary because of additional
problems discovered on the bridge.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The
Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under those Orders. This
change is not a significant regulatory
action because it is expected to have
minimal impact on mariners since the
operating hours effected are during the
evening and early morning when vessel
traffic is at a minimum. The Coast
Guard has carefully coordinated the
restrictions with commercial and
recreational waterway users.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be in
effect from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. with two
hour notification for opening when
vessel traffic is low. Vessels that can
safely transit under the bridge may do
so at any time.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
change to the operating schedule for the
Wrightsville Beach Bridge in order to
accommodate necessary repair. This
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 117.821, from 7 a.m. on April
16, 2013, through 7 p.m. on March 1,
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
2014, suspend paragraph (a)(4) and add
paragraph (a)(6) to read as follows:
§ 117.821 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Albemarle Sound to Sunset Beach.
(a) * * *
(6) S.R. 74 Bridge, mile 283.1 at
Wrightsville Beach, NC, between 7 a.m.
and 7 p.m., the draw need only open on
the hour and from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. need
not open, except with a two hour
advance notice; except that from 7 a.m.
to 9 a.m. on the second Saturday of July
of every year, from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. on
the third and fourth Saturday of
September of every year, and from 7
a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on the last Saturday
of October of every year or the first or
second Saturday of November of every
year, the draw need not open for vessels
due to annual races.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 4, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–09549 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 162
23849
If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email Lieutenant Lucas Mancini, U.S.
Coast Guard Eleventh District;
telephone (510) 437–3801 or email
Lucas.W.Mancini@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On
January 23, 2013, we published a direct
final rule and request for comment
entitled, ‘‘Inland Waterways Navigation
Regulation: Sacramento River, CA’’ in
the Federal Register (78 FR 4785). That
rule announced our intent to update the
inland waterways navigation regulations
by removing the Decker Island restricted
anchorage described in 33 CFR
162.205(c).
In the direct final rule we notified the
public of our intent to make the rule
effective on April 23, 2013, unless an
adverse comment, or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, was
received on or before March 25, 2013.
We did not receive any comments or
notices of intent to submit an adverse
comment on the rule. Therefore, under
33 CFR 1.05–55(d), we now confirm that
the removal of the Decker Island
restricted anchorage will become
effective, as scheduled, on April 23,
2013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 9, 2013.
K.L. Schultz,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–09518 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0952]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
RIN 1625–AB95
Inland Waterways Navigation
Regulation: Sacramento River, CA
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
Coast Guard
The Coast Guard is
confirming the removal of the Decker
Island restricted anchorage area in the
Sacramento River. The restricted
anchorage area was needed in the past
to prevent non-government vessels from
transiting through or anchoring in the
United States Army’s tug and barge
anchorage zones. The United States
Army relinquished control of the Island
in 1975. A direct final rule detailing the
removal of the restricted anchorage
regulation was published in the Federal
Register on January 23, 2013. We
received no comments in response,
therefore, the rule will go into effect as
scheduled.
DATES: The effective date of the direct
final rule published January 23, 2013
(78 FR 4785) is confirmed as April 23,
2013.
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0069]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33 CFR Part 165
Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks;
City of Antioch, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zone for the City of Antioch
Fourth of July Fireworks display in the
Captain of the Port, San Francisco area
of responsibility during the dates and
times noted below. This action is
necessary to protect life and property of
the maritime public from the hazards
associated with the fireworks display.
During the enforcement period,
unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring in the safety zone,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23847-23849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09549]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0197]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; North Carolina Cut, Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Wrightsville Beach, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the operating schedule
that governs the operation of the S.R. 74 Bridge, at AIWW mile 283.1,
over the North Carolina Cut, at Wrightsville Beach, NC. This rule
restricts the operation of the draw span to facilitate the additional
unforeseen structural repair of the bridge. This change allows the
bridge to open on a two hour advance notification at night so the
necessary repairs may be made while still providing reasonable needs of
navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective from April 23, 2013 until 7 a.m. on March
1, 2014, and has been enforced with actual notice since 7 p.m. on April
16, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0197. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Jim Rousseau, Bridge Management
Specialist, Coast Guard, telephone (757) 398-6422, email
James.L.Rousseau2@uscg.mil. If you have questions on reviewing the
docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
(202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard published a temporary deviation (77 FR 64411) on
October 22, 2012, which allowed the bridge to operate under a
restricted schedule until March 15, 2013, so structural repairs could
be made to the bridge. The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final
rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for
good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing
a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule
because it is impracticable. The Coast Guard did not learn of the
severity of the bridge damage and necessity of the repairs until after
the previous deviation period ended. The repairs that are the subject
of this regulation need to be undertaken as soon as possible to ensure
safe use of the bridge.
On March 22, 2013, the Coast Guard received a letter from the
bridge owner identifying additional structural problems with the bridge
that would require work to continue under an altered bridge operating
schedule. After coordination with the bridge owner and contractor, the
Coast Guard established a maintenance schedule. The necessary repairs
are more extensive and will require a longer alteration period from the
bridge schedule. As of the effective date, emergency work will be
ongoing at the bridge in accordance with the schedule set forth in this
document. Forgoing notice and comment will minimize disruption to the
work already underway, provide for the reasonable needs of navigation,
and allow for an efficient course of repairs in order to eventually
return this bridge to its regular operating schedule, and thus, any
delay is impracticable.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same reasons as discussed above,
the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, which owns and
operates this bascule lift bridge, has
[[Page 23848]]
requested a temporary change to the existing operating regulations set
out in 33 CFR 117.821 (a)(4), to facilitate the additional emergency
structural repair of the bridge. The current operating schedule opens
on the hour from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and on demand during the rest of the
day.
The S.R. 74 Bridge, at AIWW mile 283.1, over the North Carolina
Cut, at Wrightsville Beach, NC has unlimited vertical clearances in the
open position and closed position of 20 feet above mean high water
respectively.
The Coast Guard initially published a temporary deviation (77 FR
64411) on October 22, 2012, which allowed the bridge to operate under a
restricted schedule until March 15, 2013, to accommodate for repair.
However, the repairs are more extensive than initially contemplated and
were not discovered until the end of the project. A contract extension
was granted and a formal request to continue work by letter was
received on March 22, 2013. Therefore, in order to facilitate the
required additional repair work and to minimize the impact on
navigation, from April 16, 2013, to March 1, 2014, the bridge shall
open providing 2-hour advance notice during the evening and early
morning hours when impact to navigation will be the least. The
temporary final rule is needed to complete extensive work on the
bridge.
Vessel traffic along this part of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway consists of commercial and pleasure craft including sail
boats, fishing boats, and tug and barge traffic that transit mainly
during the daylight hours with the occasional recreational and
commercial fishing vessel traffic at night. There are fewer openings at
night for mariners, making it a more suitable time to restrict the
operation of the drawbridge. There are no alternate routes for vessels
transiting this section of the North Carolina.
C. Discussion of Temporary Final Rule
Under this temporary final rule the Coast Guard is temporarily
revising the operating regulations at 33 CFR 117.821 by suspending the
current regulation listed at 33 CFR 117.821(a)(4) and adding the
revised regulation at 33 CFR 117.821(a)(6). The regulation will now
read that between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., the draw need only open on the
hour and from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. need not open, except with a two hour
advance notice. The remainder of 33 CFR 117.821 will remain unchanged.
This temporary final rule is necessary because of additional problems
discovered on the bridge.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. This change is not a
significant regulatory action because it is expected to have minimal
impact on mariners since the operating hours effected are during the
evening and early morning when vessel traffic is at a minimum. The
Coast Guard has carefully coordinated the restrictions with commercial
and recreational waterway users.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be in effect from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. with two hour notification
for opening when vessel traffic is low. Vessels that can safely transit
under the bridge may do so at any time.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
[[Page 23849]]
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the change to the operating schedule
for the Wrightsville Beach Bridge in order to accommodate necessary
repair. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 117.821, from 7 a.m. on April 16, 2013, through 7 p.m. on
March 1, 2014, suspend paragraph (a)(4) and add paragraph (a)(6) to
read as follows:
Sec. 117.821 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Albemarle Sound to
Sunset Beach.
(a) * * *
(6) S.R. 74 Bridge, mile 283.1 at Wrightsville Beach, NC, between 7
a.m. and 7 p.m., the draw need only open on the hour and from 7 p.m. to
7 a.m. need not open, except with a two hour advance notice; except
that from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. on the second Saturday of July of every
year, from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. on the third and fourth Saturday of
September of every year, and from 7 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on the last
Saturday of October of every year or the first or second Saturday of
November of every year, the draw need not open for vessels due to
annual races.
* * * * *
Dated: April 4, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-09549 Filed 4-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P