Safety Zone; Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks; Crescent City Harbor, Crescent City, CA, 23866-23869 [2013-09547]
Download as PDF
23866
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 78
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Ray
Mei, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and
Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6467; fax:
425–917–6590; email:
raymont.mei@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration
Discussion
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0678; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–020–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing
Company
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The FAA withdraws a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that
proposed a new airworthiness directive
(AD) for certain The Boeing Company
Model 777–200 and –300 series
airplanes. The proposed AD would have
required installing new operational
software in the cabin management
system, and loading new software into
the mass memory card. Since the
proposed AD was issued, we have
received new data that indicates the
unsafe condition would not be
adequately addressed by the proposed
action. Subsequently, we are
considering issuing new rulemaking
that positively addresses the unsafe
condition identified in the NPRM and
eliminates the need for the actions
proposed in the NPRM. Accordingly,
the proposed AD is withdrawn.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD action, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is the Document
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
We proposed to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
part 39) with a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for a new AD for
certain Model 777–200 and –300 series
airplanes. That NPRM published in the
Federal Register on July 7, 2010 (75 FR
38945). The NPRM would have required
installing new operational software in
the cabin management system, and
loading new software into the mass
memory card. The NPRM resulted from
an in-flight entertainment (IFE) systems
review. The proposed actions were
intended to ensure that the flightcrew is
able to turn off electrical power to the
IFE system and other non-essential
electrical systems through a switch in
the flight compartment in the event of
smoke or flames. In the event of smoke
or flames in the airplane flight deck or
passenger cabin, the flightcrew’s
inability to turn off electrical power to
the IFE system and other non-essential
electrical systems could result in the
inability to control smoke or flames in
the airplane flight deck or passenger
cabin during a non-normal or
emergency situation.
Actions Since NPRM (75 FR 38945, July
7, 2010) Was Issued
Since we issued the NPRM (75 FR
38945, July 7, 2010), we have received
new data that the actions that indicates
the unsafe condition would not be
adequately addressed by the proposed
action. Subsequently, we are
considering issuing new rulemaking
that positively addresses the unsafe
condition identified in the NPRM and
eliminates the need for the actions
proposed in the NPRM.
FAA’s Conclusions
Upon further consideration, we have
determined that the unsafe condition
still exists, however, we intend to
address it with new AD rulemaking.
Accordingly, the NPRM (75 FR 38945,
July 7, 2010) is withdrawn.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Withdrawal of the NPRM (75 FR
38945, July 7, 2010) does not preclude
the FAA from issuing another related
action or commit the FAA to any course
of action in the future.
Regulatory Impact
Since this action only withdraws an
NPRM (75 FR 38945, July 7, 2010), it is
neither a proposed nor a final rule and
therefore is not covered under Executive
Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, we withdraw the NPRM,
Docket No. FAA–2010–0678, Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–020–AD, which
published in the Federal Register on
July 7, 2010 (75 FR 38945).
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
1, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–09428 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0076]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Crescent City 4th of July
Fireworks; Crescent City Harbor,
Crescent City, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters near Crescent City,
CA in support of the Crescent City 4th
of July Fireworks on July 4, 2013. This
safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of participants and spectators
from the dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. The safety zone will
temporarily restrict vessel movement
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
within the designated area on July 4,
2013, from 9:30 p.m. until 10:15 p.m.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 23, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or May
7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0076 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade
William J. Hawn at 415–399–7442, or
email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket,
contact the Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0076) in
the ‘‘Search’’ box and click ‘‘Search.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0076) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23867
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold public
meetings on this proposed rule. But you
may submit a request for one using one
of the methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to establish safety zones.
Crescent City-Del Norte County
Chamber of Commerce will sponsor the
Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks on
July 4, 2013, off of the West Jetty in
Crescent City Harbor, CA in
approximate position 41°44′41″ N,
124°11′59″ W (NAD 83) as depicted in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Chart 18603.
Upon the commencement of the
fireworks display, the safety zone will
encompass the navigable waters around
and under the launch site within a
radius of 560 feet. The fireworks display
is meant for entertainment purposes.
This restricted area around the launch
site is necessary to protect spectators,
vessels, and other property from the
hazards associated with the
pyrotechnics.
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone will
encompass the navigable waters around
the land based launch site on the West
Jetty in Crescent City Harbor, Crescent
City, CA. Upon the commencement of
the fireworks display, scheduled to take
place from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July
4, 2013, the safety zone will encompass
the navigable waters around the
fireworks launch site within a radius
560 feet from position 41°44′41″ N,
124°11′59″ W (NAD 83) for the Crescent
City 4th of July Fireworks. At the
conclusion of the fireworks display the
safety zone shall terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety
zone will be to restrict navigation in the
vicinity of the launch site until the
conclusion of the scheduled display.
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations
are needed to keep spectators and
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
23868
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
vessels away from the immediate
vicinity of the launch site to ensure the
safety of participants, spectators, and
transiting vessels.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule does not rise to the level of
necessitating a full Regulatory
Evaluation. The safety zone is limited in
duration and is limited to a narrowly
tailored geographic area. In addition,
although this rule restricts access to the
waters encompassed by the safety zone,
the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway
users will be notified via public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure
the safety zone will result in minimum
impact. The entities most likely to be
affected are waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and
operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities and
sightseeing. This safety zone would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety
zone would be activated, and thus
subject to enforcement, for a limited
duration. When the safety zone is
activated, vessel traffic could pass safely
around the safety zone. The maritime
public will be advised in advance of this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
safety zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone of limited size and duration. This
rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g)
and 35(b) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165–T11–0076 to read as
follows:
■
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2013–09547 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0033]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Redwood City 4th of July
Fireworks Show; Port of Redwood
City, Redwood City, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of the Port of Redwood
City near Redwood City, CA in support
of the Redwood City 4th of July
Fireworks Show on July 4, 2013. This
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of participants and spectators
from the dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. The safety zone will
temporarily restrict vessel movement
within the designated area on July 4,
2013, from 9:30 p.m. until 10 p.m.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0033 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joshua V. Dykman at 415–399–3585, or
email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket,
contact the Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
33 CFR Part 165
(a) Location. This safety zone is
established in the navigable waters near
the West Jetty of Crescent City Harbor,
Crescent City, CA, as depicted in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Chart 18603.
The temporary safety zone will
encompass the navigable waters around
the fireworks launch site in position
41°44′41″ N, 124°11′59″ W (NAD 83)
within a radius of 560 feet.
(b) Enforcement period. The zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced from 9:30 p.m.
through 10:15 p.m. on July 4, 2013. The
15:03 Apr 22, 2013
Dated: April 1, 2013.
Cynthia L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
Coast Guard
§ 165–T11–0076 Safety Zone; Crescent
City 4th of July Fireworks, Crescent City
Harbor, Crescent City, CA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Captain of the Port San Francisco
(COTP) will notify the maritime
community of periods during which this
zone will be enforced via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners in accordance with
33 CFR 165.7.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
on a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal,
State, or local officer designated by or
assisting the COTP in the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in 33 CFR Part 165.23, entry
into, transiting or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone on VHF–23A or through the 24hour Command Center at telephone
(415) 399–3547.
23869
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2013–0033),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23866-23869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09547]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0076]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks; Crescent City
Harbor, Crescent City, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
in the navigable waters near Crescent City, CA in support of the
Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks on July 4, 2013. This safety zone
is necessary to ensure the safety of participants and spectators from
the dangers associated with the pyrotechnics. The safety zone will
temporarily restrict vessel movement
[[Page 23867]]
within the designated area on July 4, 2013, from 9:30 p.m. until 10:15
p.m.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 23, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or May 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2013-0076 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade William J. Hawn at 415-
399-7442, or email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact the Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0076) in the ``Search'' box and click
``Search.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0076) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold public meetings on this proposed rule. But
you may submit a request for one using one of the methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would
be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize
the Coast Guard to establish safety zones.
Crescent City-Del Norte County Chamber of Commerce will sponsor the
Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks on July 4, 2013, off of the West
Jetty in Crescent City Harbor, CA in approximate position
41[deg]44'41'' N, 124[deg]11'59'' W (NAD 83) as depicted in National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18603. Upon the
commencement of the fireworks display, the safety zone will encompass
the navigable waters around and under the launch site within a radius
of 560 feet. The fireworks display is meant for entertainment purposes.
This restricted area around the launch site is necessary to protect
spectators, vessels, and other property from the hazards associated
with the pyrotechnics.
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone will encompass the navigable waters around
the land based launch site on the West Jetty in Crescent City Harbor,
Crescent City, CA. Upon the commencement of the fireworks display,
scheduled to take place from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013, the
safety zone will encompass the navigable waters around the fireworks
launch site within a radius 560 feet from position 41[deg]44'41'' N,
124[deg]11'59'' W (NAD 83) for the Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks.
At the conclusion of the fireworks display the safety zone shall
terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the launch site until the conclusion of
the scheduled display. Except for persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations are needed to keep spectators
and
[[Page 23868]]
vessels away from the immediate vicinity of the launch site to ensure
the safety of participants, spectators, and transiting vessels.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this rule does not rise to the
level of necessitating a full Regulatory Evaluation. The safety zone is
limited in duration and is limited to a narrowly tailored geographic
area. In addition, although this rule restricts access to the waters
encompassed by the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway users will be notified via
public Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will
result in minimum impact. The entities most likely to be affected are
waterfront facilities, commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing. This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety zone would be activated, and
thus subject to enforcement, for a limited duration. When the safety
zone is activated, vessel traffic could pass safely around the safety
zone. The maritime public will be advised in advance of this safety
zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 23869]]
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone of limited size and
duration. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) and 35(b) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction.
An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165-T11-0076 to read as follows:
Sec. 165-T11-0076 Safety Zone; Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks,
Crescent City Harbor, Crescent City, CA.
(a) Location. This safety zone is established in the navigable
waters near the West Jetty of Crescent City Harbor, Crescent City, CA,
as depicted in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Chart 18603. The temporary safety zone will encompass the navigable
waters around the fireworks launch site in position 41[deg]44'41'' N,
124[deg]11'59'' W (NAD 83) within a radius of 560 feet.
(b) Enforcement period. The zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. through 10:15 p.m. on July 4,
2013. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) will notify the
maritime community of periods during which this zone will be enforced
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer on a Coast Guard
vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting
the COTP in the enforcement of the safety zone.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165.23, entry into, transiting or anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
Dated: April 1, 2013.
Cynthia L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2013-09547 Filed 4-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P