Sex Offender Registration Amendments, 23835-23836 [2013-09471]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
will lead to a modest burden reduction,
however, the Commission does not
expect that the economic impact of the
Rule will be significant.
Accordingly, this document serves as
notice to the Small Business
Administration of the FTC’s
certification of no effect. Although the
Commission certifies under the RFA
that the Rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, the Commission has
determined, nonetheless, that it is
appropriate to publish an FRFA.
Therefore, the Commission has prepared
the following analysis:
the final rule eliminates duplicative
labeling burden for alternative fueled
vehicles.
A. Description of the Reasons That
Action by the Agency Is Being Taken
To provide clear disclosures to
consumers and reduce labeling burden,
the final rule directs manufacturers to
use EPA fuel economy labels in lieu of
the existing FTC label. Section 406(a) of
EPAct 92 directs the Commission to
establish uniform labeling requirements,
to the greatest extent practicable, for
alternative fuels and AFVs.
PART 309—LABELING
REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTERNATIVE
FUELS AND ALTERNATIVE FUELED
VEHICLES
B. Issues Raised by Comments in
Response to the IRFA
No comments raised concerns with
the impacts of the amendments on small
businesses. By consolidating FTC labels
with EPA’s labels for new AFVs and
eliminating the used vehicle label
requirement, the amendments are likely
to reduce impacts on small businesses.
C. Estimate of Number of Small Entities
to Which the Amendments Will Apply
Under the Small Business Size
Standards issued by the Small Business
Administration, automobile
manufacturers qualify as small
businesses if they have fewer than 1,000
employees. The Commission estimates
that approximately six vehicle
manufacturers or commercial importers
subject to the Rule qualify as small
businesses.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping,
and Other Compliance Requirements
The final rule does not impose any
additional reporting, recordkeeping, or
compliance requirements. Rather, it
eliminates FTC labeling requirements
for certain vehicles. The classes of small
entities affected by the Rule include fuel
distributors, vehicle manufacturers, and
fuel retailers.
E. Description of Steps Taken To
Minimize Significant Economic Impact,
If Any, on Small Entities, Including
Alternatives
As discussed in the Paperwork
Reduction Act analysis of this Notice,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
Final Rule
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 309
Alternative fuel, Alternative fueled
vehicle, Energy conservation, Labeling,
reporting and recordkeeping, Trade
practices.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Trade
Commission amends Title 16, Chapter 1,
Subchapter C of the Code of Federal
Regulations, part 309, as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 309
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 13232(a).
2. In § 309.1, revise paragraph
(f)(2)(ii), add paragraph (f)(3), remove
paragraphs (dd), (ee), and (ff), and
redesignate (gg) as (dd).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 309.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Designed primarily for
transportation of persons and has a
capacity of more than 12 persons; or
(3) Any vehicle that is—
(i) A new qualified fuel cell motor
vehicle (as defined in 26 U.S.C.
30B(b)(3));
(ii) A new advanced lean burn
technology motor vehicle (as defined in
26 U.S.C. 30B(c)(3));
(iii) A new qualified hybrid motor
vehicle (as defined in 26 U.S.C.
30B(d)(3)); or
(iv) Any other type of vehicle that the
Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency demonstrates to the
Secretary would achieve a significant
reduction in petroleum consumption.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 309.20 to read as follows:
§ 309.20 Labeling requirements for new
covered vehicles.
(a) Before offering a new covered
vehicle for acquisition to consumers,
manufacturers shall affix or cause to be
affixed, and new vehicle dealers shall
maintain or cause to be maintained, fuel
economy labels as required by 40 CFR
part 600. For dual fueled vehicles, such
labels must include driving range
information for alternative fuel and
gasoline operation and be otherwise
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23835
consistent with provisions in 40 CFR
part 600.
(b) If an aftermarket conversion
system is installed on a vehicle by a
person other than the manufacturer
prior to such vehicle’s being acquired by
a consumer, the manufacturer shall
provide that person with the vehicle’s
fuel economy label prepared pursuant to
40 CFR part 600 and ensure that new
fuel economy vehicle labels are affixed
to such vehicles as required by
paragraph (a) of this section.
§§ 309.21 and 309.22
■
§ 309.23
■
[Removed]
4. Remove §§ 309.21 and 309.22.
[Redesignated as § 309.21]
5. Redesignate § 309.23 as § 309.21.
Appendix A to part 309 [Amended]
6. In Appendix A to part 309, remove
figures 4, 5, 5.1, and 6.
■
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–09568 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER
SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
28 CFR Part 811
RIN 3225–AA10
Sex Offender Registration
Amendments
Court Services and Offender
Supervision Agency for the District of
Columbia.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency for the
District of Columbia (‘‘CSOSA’’) is
amending its regulations which set forth
procedures and requirements relating to
periodic verification of registration
information for sex offenders.
Furthermore, the rule permits CSOSA to
verify addresses of sex offenders by
conducting home visits on its own
accord and with its law enforcement
partners. The rule also clarifies the
schedule for verifying home addresses,
even for those sex offenders who are
required to register but are not under
CSOSA’s supervision.
DATES: Effective April 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Office of the General
Counsel, CSOSA, 633 Indiana Avenue
NW., Room 1380, Washington, DC
20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rorey Smith, Deputy General Counsel,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
23836
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(202) 220–5797, or
rorey.smith@csosa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
CSOSA is responsible under the
District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, D.C. Law 13–
137, D.C. Official Code Sections 22–
4001 et seq., for carrying out the sex
offender registration functions in the
District of Columbia, including
verification of information maintained
on sex offenders. In addition, the Sex
Offender Registration and Notification
Act (SORNA), Title I of the Adam Walsh
Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,
(Pub. L. 109–248), provides a
comprehensive set of minimum
standards for sex offender registration
and notification in the United States.
SORNA is designed to strengthen and
increase the effectiveness of sex
offender registration and notification for
the protection of the public and to
reduce the risk that sex offenders could
evade registration requirements or the
consequences of registration violations.
On December 11, 2012, CSOSA
published a proposed rule to amend
part 811, Title 28 of the Code of the
Federal Regulations, and it can be found
at 77 FR 73558. The proposed rule was
published to allow CSOSA to better
meet the requirements of the District of
Columbia Sex Offender Registration Act
of 1999 and SORNA. CSOSA now
adopts the proposed rule as a final rule
without change.
II. Statutory Authority
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999
The District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, D.C. Law 13–
137, D.C. Official Code Sections 22–
4001 et seq., grants CSOSA the authority
to adopt and implement procedures and
requirements for verification of address
information and other information
required for registration.
The Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act (SORNA)
The Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act (SORNA), Title I of the
Adam Walsh Child Protection and
Safety Act of 2006, (Pub. L. 109–248),
requires a sex offender to appear in
person, allowing the jurisdiction to take
a current photograph and verify the
information in the sex offender registry
on a scheduled frequency. Jurisdictions
may require verification of registration
information with greater frequency than
that required by SORNA and may wish
to include in their systems additional
means of verification for registration
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Apr 22, 2013
Jkt 229001
information, such as mailing address
verification forms to the registered
residence address, requesting that the
sex offender to sign and return a
verification form, crosschecking
information provided by the sex
offender for inclusion in the registry
against other records systems, and
verifying home addresses through home
visits.
Jurisdictions are required to notify
appropriate law enforcement agencies of
failures by sex offenders to comply with
registration requirements, and such
registration violations must be reflected
in the sex offender registry. SORNA
requires that jurisdictions and the
appropriate law enforcement agencies
take any appropriate action to ensure
compliance. Federal law enforcement
resources, including those of the United
States Marshals Service, are permitted
to assist jurisdictions in locating and
apprehending sex offenders who violate
registration requirements.
III. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Executive Order 12866
CSOSA has determined that this rule
is not a significant rule within the
meaning of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive
Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications
requiring a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The rule will not have a significant
economic impact upon a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The rule will not cause State, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector,
to spend $100,000,000 or more in any
one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. No
action under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle E—
Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E—
Congressional Review Act), now
codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The rule will
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 811
Probation and parole.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency for the
District of Columbia amends 28 CFR
part 811 as follows:
PART 811—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR
part 811 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: DC ST sec. 24–133 and the
District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, D.C. Law 13–137.
2. In § 811.9, revise paragraph (c) and
add paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 811.9 Periodic verification of registration
information.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Quarterly or annually, as
appropriate, CSOSA will send a
certified letter with return receipt
requested to the home of the sex
offender.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) CSOSA, either on its own accord
or with its law enforcement partners,
will conduct home verifications of
registered sex offenders pursuant to the
following schedule:
(1) Semi-annually, at least every six
months, for all registered Class A sex
offenders without supervision
obligation.
(2) Annually, for all registered Class B
sex offenders without a supervision
obligation.
(3) As directed by CSOSA and
consistent with Agency policy for all
Class A and B sex offenders with
supervision obligation.
May 28, 2013.
Dated: April 16, 2013.
Nancy M. Ware,
Director, CSOSA.
[FR Doc. 2013–09471 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3129–04–P
E:\FR\FM\23APR1.SGM
23APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23835-23836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09471]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
28 CFR Part 811
RIN 3225-AA10
Sex Offender Registration Amendments
AGENCY: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District
of Columbia.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the
District of Columbia (``CSOSA'') is amending its regulations which set
forth procedures and requirements relating to periodic verification of
registration information for sex offenders. Furthermore, the rule
permits CSOSA to verify addresses of sex offenders by conducting home
visits on its own accord and with its law enforcement partners. The
rule also clarifies the schedule for verifying home addresses, even for
those sex offenders who are required to register but are not under
CSOSA's supervision.
DATES: Effective April 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Office of the General Counsel, CSOSA, 633 Indiana Avenue
NW., Room 1380, Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rorey Smith, Deputy General Counsel,
[[Page 23836]]
(202) 220-5797, or rorey.smith@csosa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
CSOSA is responsible under the District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, D.C. Law 13-137, D.C. Official Code Sections
22-4001 et seq., for carrying out the sex offender registration
functions in the District of Columbia, including verification of
information maintained on sex offenders. In addition, the Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), Title I of the Adam Walsh
Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, (Pub. L. 109-248), provides a
comprehensive set of minimum standards for sex offender registration
and notification in the United States. SORNA is designed to strengthen
and increase the effectiveness of sex offender registration and
notification for the protection of the public and to reduce the risk
that sex offenders could evade registration requirements or the
consequences of registration violations.
On December 11, 2012, CSOSA published a proposed rule to amend part
811, Title 28 of the Code of the Federal Regulations, and it can be
found at 77 FR 73558. The proposed rule was published to allow CSOSA to
better meet the requirements of the District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999 and SORNA. CSOSA now adopts the proposed rule
as a final rule without change.
II. Statutory Authority
The District of Columbia Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999
The District of Columbia Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999,
D.C. Law 13-137, D.C. Official Code Sections 22-4001 et seq., grants
CSOSA the authority to adopt and implement procedures and requirements
for verification of address information and other information required
for registration.
The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA)
The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), Title I
of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, (Pub. L.
109-248), requires a sex offender to appear in person, allowing the
jurisdiction to take a current photograph and verify the information in
the sex offender registry on a scheduled frequency. Jurisdictions may
require verification of registration information with greater frequency
than that required by SORNA and may wish to include in their systems
additional means of verification for registration information, such as
mailing address verification forms to the registered residence address,
requesting that the sex offender to sign and return a verification
form, crosschecking information provided by the sex offender for
inclusion in the registry against other records systems, and verifying
home addresses through home visits.
Jurisdictions are required to notify appropriate law enforcement
agencies of failures by sex offenders to comply with registration
requirements, and such registration violations must be reflected in the
sex offender registry. SORNA requires that jurisdictions and the
appropriate law enforcement agencies take any appropriate action to
ensure compliance. Federal law enforcement resources, including those
of the United States Marshals Service, are permitted to assist
jurisdictions in locating and apprehending sex offenders who violate
registration requirements.
III. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Executive Order 12866
CSOSA has determined that this rule is not a significant rule
within the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications requiring a Federalism
Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The rule will not have a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The rule will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or the
private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No action
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle
E--Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E--
Congressional Review Act), now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 811
Probation and parole.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia amends 28 CFR
part 811 as follows:
PART 811--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 811 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: DC ST sec. 24-133 and the District of Columbia Sex
Offender Registration Act of 1999, D.C. Law 13-137.
0
2. In Sec. 811.9, revise paragraph (c) and add paragraph (e) to read
as follows:
Sec. 811.9 Periodic verification of registration information.
* * * * *
(c) Quarterly or annually, as appropriate, CSOSA will send a
certified letter with return receipt requested to the home of the sex
offender.
* * * * *
(e) CSOSA, either on its own accord or with its law enforcement
partners, will conduct home verifications of registered sex offenders
pursuant to the following schedule:
(1) Semi-annually, at least every six months, for all registered
Class A sex offenders without supervision obligation.
(2) Annually, for all registered Class B sex offenders without a
supervision obligation.
(3) As directed by CSOSA and consistent with Agency policy for all
Class A and B sex offenders with supervision obligation.
May 28, 2013.
Dated: April 16, 2013.
Nancy M. Ware,
Director, CSOSA.
[FR Doc. 2013-09471 Filed 4-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3129-04-P