Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters, 23462-23465 [2013-08459]
Download as PDF
23462
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(k) Definition
For purposes of this AD, a serviceable
stowage box has P/N CSD 30–005–3–8 with
any S/N 1013 or higher, or any serial number
below 1013 with the suffix ‘‘–A.’’
emergency European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) Airworthiness Directive 2013–0059–
E, dated March 8, 2013; and Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–241, dated
March 7, 2013; for related information.
(l) Terminating Action
Except as required by paragraph (j) of this
AD, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD, replace
any non-serviceable stowage box with a
serviceable stowage box, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–241, dated
March 7, 2013. Replacement of all affected
stowage boxes terminates the requirements of
paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD, and the
AFM revision required by paragraph (h) of
this AD may be removed from the AFM.
(1) For a stowage box that has accumulated
less than 50 total flight hours as of the
effective date of this AD: Replace the stowage
box within 8 days after the AFM revision
required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) For a stowage box that has accumulated
50 or more total flight hours as of the
effective date of this AD: Replace the stowage
box within 65 days after the AFM revision
required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
(p) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin
7X–241, dated March 7, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606;
telephone 201–440–6700; Internet https://
www.dassaultfalcon.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
(m) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a non-serviceable flight
crew oxygen mask stowage box any airplane.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically refer to this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to ensure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(o) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Apr 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
chip collector, both installed on the
main gearbox (MGB). This AD is
prompted by an investigation which
showed a failure within the epicyclic
reduction gear module (epicyclic
module) resulted in the rupture of the
MGB case and separation of the main
rotor head of a Model AS332L2
helicopter. These actions are intended
to prevent failure of the MGB and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 3,
2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager,Transport Airplane
Directorate,Aircraft Certification Service.
This AD becomes effective May
6, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain documents listed in this AD
as of May 6, 2013.
We must receive comments on this
AD by June 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
[FR Doc. 2013–09108 Filed 4–18–13; 8:45 am]
Examining the AD Docket
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations Office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, Texas 75052, telephone
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax
(972) 641–3775, or at https://
www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may
review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rao
Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and
Policy Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0307; Directorate
Identifier 2012–SW–079–AD; Amendment
39–17410; AD 2013–07–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting an
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model
AS332C, AS332L, and AS332L1
helicopters and superseding an AD for
Model AS332L2 and EC225LP
helicopters. This AD requires inspecting
the chip detector and modifying the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM
19APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone:
(817) 222–4389; fax: (817) 222–5961,
email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments prior to it becoming effective.
However, we invite you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that resulted from
adopting this AD. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the AD, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file
in the docket all comments that we
receive, as well as a report summarizing
each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerning this
rulemaking during the comment period.
We will consider all the comments we
receive and may conduct additional
rulemaking based on those comments.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion
On December 28, 2011, we issued AD
2012–01–03, Amendment 39–16914 (77
FR 5991, February 7, 2012) for
Eurocopter Model AS332L2 and
EC225LP helicopters. AD 2012–01–03,
Amendment 39–16914 requires
determining whether the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light illuminated because of a
metal particle on the chip detector of
the epicyclic module, and whether the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light stayed
illuminated after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
switch was turned to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’
setting. If so, or if the maintenance
records do not indicate which ‘‘CHIP’’
detector caused the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
light to illuminate or whether the
detector light stayed illuminated after
the switch was turned, AD 2012–01–03
requires replacing the epicyclic module
before further flight. AD 2012–01–03
also requires replacing the epicyclic
module if, thereafter, the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light illuminates, stays
illuminated after the switch is turned,
and there is a metal particle on the
epicyclic module chip detector. Lastly,
AD 2012–01–03 requires removing,
modifying, re-identifying, and
reinstalling the chip collector within 50
hours time-in-serivce (TIS) and before
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Apr 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
installing a MGB on any applicable
helicopter.
AD 2012–01–03, Amendment 39–
16914 (77 FR 5991, February 7, 2012)
was prompted by an investigation of an
accident that showed a failure within
the epicyclic reduction gear module of
the MGB resulted in the rupture of the
MGB case, which allowed the main
rotor head to separate from the
helicopter. The European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States
of the European Union, had issued
EASA AD 2009–0099–E, dated April 23,
2009 (2009–0099–E) to correct an unsafe
condition for Eurocopter Model
AS332L2 and EC225LP helicopters, and
notified us of the unsafe condition in its
AD. The actions of AD 2012–01–03 are
intended to prevent failure of the MGB
and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2012–01–03,
Amendment 39–16914 (77 FR 5991,
February 7, 2012), EASA issued EASA
AD No. 2012–0129–E, dated July 13,
2012 (2012–0129–E), which superseded
EASA AD 2009–0099–E, to correct an
unsafe condition for Eurocopter Model
AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, AS332L1,
AS332L2, and EC225LP helicopters.
EASA advises that, based on the final
accident report following investigation
of the accident that prompted its
original AD, it is necessary to
standardize the inspection intervals for
all electrical and non-electrical chip
detectors, require the inspection for all
models of the ‘‘Super-Puma’’ helicopter
family, and expand the inspection to all
rotor drive system gear boxes (the
intermediate gearbox (IGB) and the tail
gear box (TGB), in addition to the MGB.
EASA AD 2012–0129–E retains the
modification of the MGB epicyclic
reduction gear module requirement of
EASA AD 2009–0099–E, but expands
the applicability and requires a
recurring inspection of all electrical and
non-electrical chip detectors installed
on the MGB, IGB, and TGB.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of France and
are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with France, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
EASA AD. We are issuing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23463
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued Emergency
ASB No. 05.00.81, Revision 3, dated
July 13, 2012 (EASB 05.00.81), for
Model AS332L2 helicopters and
Emergency ASB No. 05A017, Revision
3, dated July 13, 2012 (EASB 05A017)
for Model EC225LP helicopters. Both
Emergency ASBs specify procedures for
checking the chip detector on the MGB
epicyclic module, modifying the main
module chip collector, reidentifying the
chip collector, and installing the chip
detector.
Eurocopter has also issued Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332–
05.00.94, Revision 0, dated July 13, 2012
(ASB AS332–05.00.94), for Model
AS332 C, C1, L, L1, and L2 helicopters
and ASB No. EC225–05A29, Revision 0,
dated July 13, 2012 (ASB EC225–05A29)
for Model EC225 LP helicopters. Both
ASBs standardize the time interval
between chip detector inspections of the
MGB, IGB, and TGB.
EASA classified these ASBs as
mandatory and issued EASA AD 2012–
0129–E to ensure continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.
AD Requirements
This AD retains the inspection and
modification requirements of AD 2012–
01–03, Amendment 39–16914 (77 FR
5991, February 7, 2012), and adds the
following requirements:
• For AS332 helicopters with nonelectrical chip detectors and electrical
chip detectors without a caution light
on the instrument panel, within 25
hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not
exceeding 25 hours TIS, inspecting the
MGB, IGB, and TGB chip detectors for
a chip or magnetic particle.
• For AS332 helicopters with
electrical chip detectors with a caution
light on the instrument panel, within 50
hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not
exceeding 50 hours TIS, inspecting the
MGB, IGB, and TGB chip detectors for
a chip or magnetic particle.
• For EC225 helicopters, within 50
hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not
exceeding 50 hours TIS, inspecting the
MGB, IGB, and TGB chip detectors for
a chip or magnetic particle. If there is a
chip or magnetic particle, verifying that
the ‘‘CHIP’’ caution light illuminates on
the ‘‘Vehicle’’ page of the Vehicle
Management System.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 6
helicopters of U.S. Registry. Based on an
average labor rate of $85 per work hour,
we estimate that operators may incur
the following costs in order to comply
with this AD:
E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM
19APR1
23464
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
• Inspecting maintenance records to
determine if a ‘‘CHIP’’ light illuminated
within the past 200 hours TIS will take
about 1.0 work-hour, for a total cost per
helicopter of $85;
• Removing, inspecting, and
replacing an affected epicyclic module
will require about 10 work-hours and
required parts would cost
approximately $512,318, for a total cost
per helicopter of $513,168;
• Removing, modifying, and
reidentifying the ‘‘CHIP’’ collector will
require about 14 work-hours, for a total
cost per helicopter of $1,190; and
• Inspecting the module magnetic
chip detector circuit and the MGB, IGB,
and TGB chip detectors will require
about 2 work-hours, for a total cost per
helicopter of $170 per inspection cycle.
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
The short compliance time involved
is required because the previouslydescribed unsafe condition can
adversely affect both the structural
integrity and controllability of the
helicopter. Therefore, because these
helicopters are primarily used for longrange offshore transportation and the
inspection of the MGB, IGB, and TGB
chip detectors is required within 25
hours TIS, a very short time period
based on the average flight-hour
utilization rate of these helicopters, this
AD must be issued immediately.
Since an unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD, we determined that notice and
opportunity for public comment before
issuing this AD are impracticable and
that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30
days.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Jkt 229001
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
15:06 Apr 18, 2013
Regulatory Findings
■
Authority for This Rulemaking
VerDate Mar<15>2010
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2012–01–03, Amendment 39–16914 (77
FR 5991, February 7, 2012) and adding
the following new AD:
■
2013–07–06 Eurocopter France
(Eurocopter): Amendment 39–17410;
Docket No. FAA–2013–0307; Directorate
Identifier 2012–SW–079–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Eurocopter Model
AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and
EC225LP helicopters, certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
degradation of the epicyclic reduction gear
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
module within a rotor drive system gearbox.
This condition could result in failure of the
main gearbox (MGB), intermediate gearbox
(IGB), or tail gearbox (TGB) and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2012–01–03,
Amendment No. 39–16914 (77 FR 5991,
February 7, 2012).
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective May 6, 2013.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) For Model AS332L2 and EC225LP
helicopters, before further flight:
(i) Determine from the maintenance
records whether, within the last 200 hours
time-in-service (TIS), the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
light illuminated because of a metal particle
on the chip detector of the MGB epicyclic
module (module), and if so, whether the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light stayed illuminated
after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch was turned
to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting to activate the
‘‘fuzz burn-off’’ feature.
(A) If the maintenance records indicate that
the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light illuminated
because of a metal particle on the chip
detector of the module, and the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light stayed illuminated after the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch was turned to the
‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting, replace the module
with an airworthy module before further
flight.
(B) If the maintenance records do not
indicate which ‘‘CHIP’’ detector caused the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light to illuminate, or
whether the detector light stayed illuminated
after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch was turned
to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting, replace the
module with an airworthy module before
further flight.
(ii) Inspect the module magnetic chip
detector electrical circuit and determine
whether the system is functioning properly,
including whether the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light
annunciates on the instrument panel (Vehicle
Monitoring System Screen).
(iii) After accomplishing paragraph
(f)(1)(i)–(ii) of this AD, thereafter, if the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light illuminates, stays
illuminated after the chip detector switch is
turned to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting, and
there is a metal particle on the module
magnetic chip detector (rather than the main
reduction gear (lower MGB), the flared
housing (mast assembly), the IGB, or the TGB
chip detectors) that caused the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light to illuminate, replace the
module with an airworthy module.
(iv) Within 50 hours TIS, remove, modify,
reidentify, and reinstall the chip collector as
shown in Figures 2 through 5, and in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.b.1 through
2.B.1.b.5, of Eurocopter Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 05.00.81,
Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012, or
Eurocopter EASB No. 05A017, Revision 3,
E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM
19APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
dated July 13, 2012, for your model
helicopter.
(v) Before installing a MGB, modify,
reidentify, and reinstall the chip collector in
accordance with paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this
AD.
(2) Within 25 hours TIS, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 25 hours TIS:
(i) For Model AS332C, L, and L1
helicopters with non-electrical chip detectors
and electrical chip detectors without a
caution light on the instrument panel,
inspect the IGB, TGB, tapered housing, and
MGB bottom casing chip detectors for a chip
or metallic particle.
(ii) For Model AS332L2 helicopters with
non-electrical chip detectors and electrical
chip detectors without a caution light on the
instrument panel, inspect the module, main
rotor mast tapered housing, IGB, and TGB
chip detectors for a chip or metallic particle.
(3) Within 50 hours TIS, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 50 hours TIS:
(i) For Model AS332C, L, and L1
helicopters with electrical chip detectors
with a caution light on the instrument panel,
inspect the MGB bottom casing, TGB, and
IGB chip detectors for a chip or metallic
particle.
(ii) For Model AS332L2 helicopters with
electrical chip detectors with a caution light
on the instrument panel, inspect the MGB
bottom casing chip detector for a chip or
magnetic particle.
(iii) For Model EC225LP helicopters,
inspect the MGB, IGB, and TGB chip
detectors for a chip or magnetic particle. If
there is a chip or magnetic particle,
determine whether the ‘‘CHIP’’ caution light
illuminates on the ‘‘Vehicle’’ page of the
Vehicle Management System. If the ‘‘CHIP’’
caution light does not illuminate on the
‘‘Vehicle’’ page, perform a fault analysis.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137; telephone: (817) 222–5110; fax: (817)
222–5961, email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
(1) Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
No. AS332–05–00–94, Revision 0, dated July
13, 2012, and ASB No. EC225–05A29,
Revision 0, dated July 13, 2012, which are
not incorporated by reference, contain
additional information about the subject of
this AD. For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, Texas 75052, telephone (972) 641–
0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax (972) 641–3775,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Apr 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
23465
or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub.
You may review a copy of the service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency AD No.
2012–0129–E, dated July 13, 2012.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(i) Subject
RIN 2120–AA64
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6320: Main Rotor Gearbox and 6520:
Tail Rotor Gearbox.
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin (EASB) No. 05.00.81, Revision 3,
dated July 13, 2012.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(2)(i): Eurocopter
EASB No. 05.00.81, Revision 3, dated July 13,
2012, and EASB No. 05.00.58, Revision 3,
dated July 13, 2012, were published together
as a single document. EASB No. 05.00.58,
Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012 is not
incorporated by reference.
(ii) Eurocopter EASB No. 05A017, Revision
3, dated July 13, 2012.
Note 2 to paragraph (j)(2)(ii): Eurocopter
EASB No. 05A017, Revision 3, dated July 13,
2012, and EASB No. 05A016, Revision 3,
dated July 13, 2012, were published together
as a single document. EASB No. 05A016,
Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012 is not
incorporated by reference.
(3) For Eurocopter service information
identified in this AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas 75052, telephone
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax (972)
641–3775, or at https://www.eurocopter.com/
techpub.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 27,
2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08459 Filed 4–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0938; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–271–AD; Amendment
39–17425; AD 2013–08–08]
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737–600
series airplanes. This AD was prompted
by reports of early fatigue cracks at
chem-mill areas on the crown skin
panels. This AD requires repetitive
inspections for cracking of the fuselage
skin at certain locations at chem-mill
areas, and repair if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking of the skin panel at the
specified chem-mill step locations,
which could result in rapid
decompression of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective May 24,
2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of May 24, 2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
E:\FR\FM\19APR1.SGM
19APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23462-23465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08459]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0307; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-079-AD;
Amendment 39-17410; AD 2013-07-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting an airworthiness directive (AD) for Eurocopter
France (Eurocopter) Model AS332C, AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters and
superseding an AD for Model AS332L2 and EC225LP helicopters. This AD
requires inspecting the chip detector and modifying the chip collector,
both installed on the main gearbox (MGB). This AD is prompted by an
investigation which showed a failure within the epicyclic reduction
gear module (epicyclic module) resulted in the rupture of the MGB case
and separation of the main rotor head of a Model AS332L2 helicopter.
These actions are intended to prevent failure of the MGB and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May 6, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of May 6, 2013.
We must receive comments on this AD by June 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
For service information identified in this AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas
75052, telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-3775,
or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rao Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group, 2601 Meacham
Blvd.,
[[Page 23463]]
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: (817) 222-4389; fax: (817) 222-
5961, email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that
we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the
comment period. We will consider all the comments we receive and may
conduct additional rulemaking based on those comments.
Discussion
On December 28, 2011, we issued AD 2012-01-03, Amendment 39-16914
(77 FR 5991, February 7, 2012) for Eurocopter Model AS332L2 and EC225LP
helicopters. AD 2012-01-03, Amendment 39-16914 requires determining
whether the ``CHIP'' detector light illuminated because of a metal
particle on the chip detector of the epicyclic module, and whether the
``CHIP'' detector light stayed illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector
switch was turned to the ``CHIP PULSE'' setting. If so, or if the
maintenance records do not indicate which ``CHIP'' detector caused the
``CHIP'' detector light to illuminate or whether the detector light
stayed illuminated after the switch was turned, AD 2012-01-03 requires
replacing the epicyclic module before further flight. AD 2012-01-03
also requires replacing the epicyclic module if, thereafter, the
``CHIP'' detector light illuminates, stays illuminated after the switch
is turned, and there is a metal particle on the epicyclic module chip
detector. Lastly, AD 2012-01-03 requires removing, modifying, re-
identifying, and reinstalling the chip collector within 50 hours time-
in-serivce (TIS) and before installing a MGB on any applicable
helicopter.
AD 2012-01-03, Amendment 39-16914 (77 FR 5991, February 7, 2012)
was prompted by an investigation of an accident that showed a failure
within the epicyclic reduction gear module of the MGB resulted in the
rupture of the MGB case, which allowed the main rotor head to separate
from the helicopter. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, had
issued EASA AD 2009-0099-E, dated April 23, 2009 (2009-0099-E) to
correct an unsafe condition for Eurocopter Model AS332L2 and EC225LP
helicopters, and notified us of the unsafe condition in its AD. The
actions of AD 2012-01-03 are intended to prevent failure of the MGB and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2012-01-03, Amendment 39-16914 (77 FR 5991,
February 7, 2012), EASA issued EASA AD No. 2012-0129-E, dated July 13,
2012 (2012-0129-E), which superseded EASA AD 2009-0099-E, to correct an
unsafe condition for Eurocopter Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, AS332L1,
AS332L2, and EC225LP helicopters. EASA advises that, based on the final
accident report following investigation of the accident that prompted
its original AD, it is necessary to standardize the inspection
intervals for all electrical and non-electrical chip detectors, require
the inspection for all models of the ``Super-Puma'' helicopter family,
and expand the inspection to all rotor drive system gear boxes (the
intermediate gearbox (IGB) and the tail gear box (TGB), in addition to
the MGB. EASA AD 2012-0129-E retains the modification of the MGB
epicyclic reduction gear module requirement of EASA AD 2009-0099-E, but
expands the applicability and requires a recurring inspection of all
electrical and non-electrical chip detectors installed on the MGB, IGB,
and TGB.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same
type designs.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued Emergency ASB No. 05.00.81, Revision 3, dated
July 13, 2012 (EASB 05.00.81), for Model AS332L2 helicopters and
Emergency ASB No. 05A017, Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012 (EASB 05A017)
for Model EC225LP helicopters. Both Emergency ASBs specify procedures
for checking the chip detector on the MGB epicyclic module, modifying
the main module chip collector, reidentifying the chip collector, and
installing the chip detector.
Eurocopter has also issued Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332-
05.00.94, Revision 0, dated July 13, 2012 (ASB AS332-05.00.94), for
Model AS332 C, C1, L, L1, and L2 helicopters and ASB No. EC225-05A29,
Revision 0, dated July 13, 2012 (ASB EC225-05A29) for Model EC225 LP
helicopters. Both ASBs standardize the time interval between chip
detector inspections of the MGB, IGB, and TGB.
EASA classified these ASBs as mandatory and issued EASA AD 2012-
0129-E to ensure continued airworthiness of these helicopters.
AD Requirements
This AD retains the inspection and modification requirements of AD
2012-01-03, Amendment 39-16914 (77 FR 5991, February 7, 2012), and adds
the following requirements:
For AS332 helicopters with non-electrical chip detectors
and electrical chip detectors without a caution light on the instrument
panel, within 25 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not exceeding 25
hours TIS, inspecting the MGB, IGB, and TGB chip detectors for a chip
or magnetic particle.
For AS332 helicopters with electrical chip detectors with
a caution light on the instrument panel, within 50 hours TIS and
thereafter at intervals not exceeding 50 hours TIS, inspecting the MGB,
IGB, and TGB chip detectors for a chip or magnetic particle.
For EC225 helicopters, within 50 hours TIS and thereafter
at intervals not exceeding 50 hours TIS, inspecting the MGB, IGB, and
TGB chip detectors for a chip or magnetic particle. If there is a chip
or magnetic particle, verifying that the ``CHIP'' caution light
illuminates on the ``Vehicle'' page of the Vehicle Management System.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 6 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Based on an average labor rate of $85 per work hour, we
estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to
comply with this AD:
[[Page 23464]]
Inspecting maintenance records to determine if a ``CHIP''
light illuminated within the past 200 hours TIS will take about 1.0
work-hour, for a total cost per helicopter of $85;
Removing, inspecting, and replacing an affected epicyclic
module will require about 10 work-hours and required parts would cost
approximately $512,318, for a total cost per helicopter of $513,168;
Removing, modifying, and reidentifying the ``CHIP''
collector will require about 14 work-hours, for a total cost per
helicopter of $1,190; and
Inspecting the module magnetic chip detector circuit and
the MGB, IGB, and TGB chip detectors will require about 2 work-hours,
for a total cost per helicopter of $170 per inspection cycle.
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
The short compliance time involved is required because the
previously-described unsafe condition can adversely affect both the
structural integrity and controllability of the helicopter. Therefore,
because these helicopters are primarily used for long-range offshore
transportation and the inspection of the MGB, IGB, and TGB chip
detectors is required within 25 hours TIS, a very short time period
based on the average flight-hour utilization rate of these helicopters,
this AD must be issued immediately.
Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2012-01-03, Amendment 39-16914 (77 FR 5991, February 7, 2012) and
adding the following new AD:
2013-07-06 Eurocopter France (Eurocopter): Amendment 39-17410;
Docket No. FAA-2013-0307; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-079-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Eurocopter Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1,
AS332L2, and EC225LP helicopters, certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as degradation of the
epicyclic reduction gear module within a rotor drive system gearbox.
This condition could result in failure of the main gearbox (MGB),
intermediate gearbox (IGB), or tail gearbox (TGB) and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2012-01-03, Amendment No. 39-16914 (77 FR
5991, February 7, 2012).
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective May 6, 2013.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) For Model AS332L2 and EC225LP helicopters, before further
flight:
(i) Determine from the maintenance records whether, within the
last 200 hours time-in-service (TIS), the ``CHIP'' detector light
illuminated because of a metal particle on the chip detector of the
MGB epicyclic module (module), and if so, whether the ``CHIP''
detector light stayed illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch
was turned to the ``CHIP PULSE'' setting to activate the ``fuzz
burn-off'' feature.
(A) If the maintenance records indicate that the ``CHIP''
detector light illuminated because of a metal particle on the chip
detector of the module, and the ``CHIP'' detector light stayed
illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch was turned to the
``CHIP PULSE'' setting, replace the module with an airworthy module
before further flight.
(B) If the maintenance records do not indicate which ``CHIP''
detector caused the ``CHIP'' detector light to illuminate, or
whether the detector light stayed illuminated after the ``CHIP''
detector switch was turned to the ``CHIP PULSE'' setting, replace
the module with an airworthy module before further flight.
(ii) Inspect the module magnetic chip detector electrical
circuit and determine whether the system is functioning properly,
including whether the ``CHIP'' detector light annunciates on the
instrument panel (Vehicle Monitoring System Screen).
(iii) After accomplishing paragraph (f)(1)(i)-(ii) of this AD,
thereafter, if the ``CHIP'' detector light illuminates, stays
illuminated after the chip detector switch is turned to the ``CHIP
PULSE'' setting, and there is a metal particle on the module
magnetic chip detector (rather than the main reduction gear (lower
MGB), the flared housing (mast assembly), the IGB, or the TGB chip
detectors) that caused the ``CHIP'' detector light to illuminate,
replace the module with an airworthy module.
(iv) Within 50 hours TIS, remove, modify, reidentify, and
reinstall the chip collector as shown in Figures 2 through 5, and in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.b.1
through 2.B.1.b.5, of Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
(EASB) No. 05.00.81, Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012, or Eurocopter
EASB No. 05A017, Revision 3,
[[Page 23465]]
dated July 13, 2012, for your model helicopter.
(v) Before installing a MGB, modify, reidentify, and reinstall
the chip collector in accordance with paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this
AD.
(2) Within 25 hours TIS, and thereafter at intervals not
exceeding 25 hours TIS:
(i) For Model AS332C, L, and L1 helicopters with non-electrical
chip detectors and electrical chip detectors without a caution light
on the instrument panel, inspect the IGB, TGB, tapered housing, and
MGB bottom casing chip detectors for a chip or metallic particle.
(ii) For Model AS332L2 helicopters with non-electrical chip
detectors and electrical chip detectors without a caution light on
the instrument panel, inspect the module, main rotor mast tapered
housing, IGB, and TGB chip detectors for a chip or metallic
particle.
(3) Within 50 hours TIS, and thereafter at intervals not
exceeding 50 hours TIS:
(i) For Model AS332C, L, and L1 helicopters with electrical chip
detectors with a caution light on the instrument panel, inspect the
MGB bottom casing, TGB, and IGB chip detectors for a chip or
metallic particle.
(ii) For Model AS332L2 helicopters with electrical chip
detectors with a caution light on the instrument panel, inspect the
MGB bottom casing chip detector for a chip or magnetic particle.
(iii) For Model EC225LP helicopters, inspect the MGB, IGB, and
TGB chip detectors for a chip or magnetic particle. If there is a
chip or magnetic particle, determine whether the ``CHIP'' caution
light illuminates on the ``Vehicle'' page of the Vehicle Management
System. If the ``CHIP'' caution light does not illuminate on the
``Vehicle'' page, perform a fault analysis.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: (817) 222-
5110; fax: (817) 222-5961, email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
(1) Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332-05-00-94,
Revision 0, dated July 13, 2012, and ASB No. EC225-05A29, Revision
0, dated July 13, 2012, which are not incorporated by reference,
contain additional information about the subject of this AD. For
service information identified in this AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas
75052, telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-
3775, or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review a copy
of the service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency AD No. 2012-0129-E, dated July 13, 2012.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6320: Main Rotor
Gearbox and 6520: Tail Rotor Gearbox.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No.
05.00.81, Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(2)(i): Eurocopter EASB No. 05.00.81,
Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012, and EASB No. 05.00.58, Revision 3,
dated July 13, 2012, were published together as a single document.
EASB No. 05.00.58, Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012 is not
incorporated by reference.
(ii) Eurocopter EASB No. 05A017, Revision 3, dated July 13,
2012.
Note 2 to paragraph (j)(2)(ii): Eurocopter EASB No. 05A017,
Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012, and EASB No. 05A016, Revision 3,
dated July 13, 2012, were published together as a single document.
EASB No. 05A016, Revision 3, dated July 13, 2012 is not incorporated
by reference.
(3) For Eurocopter service information identified in this AD,
contact American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, Texas 75052, telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323,
fax (972) 641-3775, or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 27, 2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-08459 Filed 4-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P