Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge Humboldt and Washoe Counties, NV, and Lake County, OR; Record of Decision for Final Environmental Impact Statement, 21964-21965 [2013-08740]
Download as PDF
21964
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Notices
• Commission review and discussion
of preliminary recommendations and
public comment;
• Closing thoughts from United South
and Eastern Tribes, Inc.;
• Review action items, meeting
accomplishments; and
• Closing blessing, adjourn.
Written comments may be sent to the
Designated Federal Official listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above. All meetings are open to
the public; however, transportation,
lodging, and meals are the responsibility
of the participating public. To review all
related material on the Commission’s
work, please refer to https://
www.doi.gov/cobell/commission/
index.cfm.
Dated: April 8, 2013.
David J. Hayes,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–08616 Filed 4–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–R–2012–N250; 1265–0000–10137–
S3]
Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge
Humboldt and Washoe Counties, NV,
and Lake County, OR; Record of
Decision for Final Environmental
Impact Statement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the record of decision
(ROD) for the final environmental
impact statement (EIS) for the Sheldon
National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). We
completed a thorough analysis of the
environmental, social, and economic
considerations and presented it in our
Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP) and EIS, which we released to the
public on August 24, 2012.
DATES: The Regional Director, Pacific
Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
signed the ROD on September 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of our final CCP and ROD by any
of the following methods:
Agency Web site: Download a copy of
the document(s) at https://www.fws.gov/
pacific/planning/main/docs/NV/
docssheldon.htm.
Email: Sheldon-Hart@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Sheldon Refuge ROD’’ in the subject
line of the message.
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
Mail: Sheldon-Hart Mountain
National Wildlife Refuge Complex, P.O.
Box 111, Lakeview, OR 97630.
Fax: (541) 947–4414.
In-person viewing: Copies of the final
CCP/EIS and ROD may be viewed at the
Sheldon-Hart Mountain National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 20995 Rabbit
Hill Road, Lakeview, Oregon.
Local Libraries: The final documents
are also available for review at the
libraries listed under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aaron Collins, (541) 947–3315 ext. 223.
referred to as the Refuge Administration
Act), 16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee, requires
us to develop a CCP for each refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. We
will review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Refuge Administration Act.
Introduction
With this notice, we complete the
CCP planning process for the Refuge.
We started this process with a Federal
Register notice (73 FR 27003; May 12,
2008). We released the draft CCP/EIS to
the public, announcing and requesting
comments in a notice of availability in
the Federal Register (76 FR 55937;
September 9, 2011). We announced the
availability of the final CCP/EIS in the
Federal Register (77 FR 51556) on
August 24, 2012.
The Refuge encompasses 575,000
acres of sagebrush-steppe habitat
located in a remote area of northwest
Nevada and southeast Oregon. The
Refuge resides in the Great Basin, and
was established in 1931 for the
conservation and protection of the onceimperiled American pronghorn.
Sheldon Refuge (along with the Hart
Mountain National Antelope Refuge)
now conserves habitat for a number of
native, rare, and imperiled species of
fish, wildlife, and plants that depend
upon the sagebrush-steppe ecosystem.
In accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice
announces the availability of the ROD
for the Refuge’s final CCP/EIS. We
completed a thorough analysis of the
environmental, social, and economic
considerations, which we included in
the final CCP/EIS, and evaluated three
management alternatives for the Refuge.
The ROD documents our selection of
Alternative 2, the preferred alternative,
in the final CCP/EIS. The CCP will
guide us in managing and administering
the Refuge for the next 15 years.
Alternative 2, as we described in the
final CCP/EIS and ROD, is the
foundation for the CCP.
CCP Alternatives and Selected
Alternatives
We identified several issues in our
draft CCP/EIS. To address these, we
developed and evaluated the following
Refuge management alternatives.
Alternative 1 (No Action Alternative)
Under Alternative 1, the no-action
alternative, we would assume no change
from current management; this
alternative is considered the base from
which to compare the other two
alternatives. We would continue to
focus our management activities on
maintaining relatively stable
populations of approximately 800 feral
horses and 90 feral burros on Refuge
lands. Fish populations in Big Spring
Reservoir would be maintained through
continued stocking of sterile rainbow
trout. Our management of Refuge
habitats would continue to include the
use of prescribed fire and mechanical
treatments to achieve habitat
management objectives.
Current public uses including
hunting, fishing, guiding, research, rock
collecting, wildlife observation,
photography, environmental education,
and interpretation would continue.
Opportunities to expand public uses or
reduce ongoing resource impacts from
public uses would be limited.
Designated campgrounds and roads
would be maintained at their current
locations. We would continue to protect
the natural primitive character and
other resource values of the Refuge’s
341,500 acres recommended for
wilderness designation in 1974, and
provide opportunities for solitude and
primitive recreation. Inventory,
monitoring, and cultural and historic
resources protection would continue to
occur on the Refuge.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (together
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Under Alternative 2, our preferred
alternative, current fish, wildlife,
habitat, and public use management
would continue, with the following key
enhancements. Native habitat
conditions would improve, by removing
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
all feral horses and burros from the
Refuge within 5 years. Populations of
trout species indigenous to the region—
Lahontan cutthroat trout, Alvord
cutthroat trout, or redband trout—would
be maintained through restocking if
necessary, replacing nonnative rainbow
trout in Big Spring Reservoir and Virgin
Creek. Control of noxious weeds and
other invasive plants would increase,
including weed control along road
corridors. Western juniper would be
removed where it is encroaching on
sagebrush-steppe habitats. Degraded
habitats would be rehabilitated and
restored, using management techniques
such as seeding, erosion control
structures, and recontouring.
Abandoned livestock water
developments would be removed, and
spring, playa, wet meadow, and stream
habitats would be restored to more
natural conditions where beneficial to
wildlife.
Recreation opportunities would
improve by relocating and enlarging the
visitor contact station, improving
campground facilities, developing an
accessible interpretive trail, creating a
self-guided auto tour route, and
improving signage of vehicle routes. We
would reopen existing routes, following
revisions to proposed Refuge wilderness
area boundaries. Maintenance of
improved gravel roads would occur
more frequently. We would relocate up
to nine campgrounds, and realign road
segments to reduce erosion and impacts
to sensitive riparian areas and cultural
resources. Seasonal road closures would
be implemented as appropriate, to
protect sensitive species and habitats.
A larger portion of Sheldon Refuge
(424,360 acres) would be recommended
for wilderness designation and managed
for wilderness character under
Alternative 2, encompassing some of the
lands identified in Alternative 1, and
additional wilderness study areas
identified in the 2009 Sheldon Refuge
Wilderness Review. We would increase
our inventory and protection of historic
and cultural resources, and improve
historic and cultural resources
interpretation.
Alternative 3
Under Alternative 3, changes to
current management would include
removing all feral horses and burros
from the Refuge over a period of 15
years; replacing nonnative trout in Big
Spring Reservoir with trout species
indigenous to the region, but not
maintaining the trout population
through restocking; and managing
habitats by creating conditions where
natural processes such as fire could be
allowed more frequently with less
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
dependence on prescribed fire and other
intensive management actions. Current
public uses would continue; however,
some facilities would be consolidated
and some uses would be curtailed.
Vehicle access to the Refuge would be
reduced under Alternative 3 due to the
closure of two roads and road
maintenance limited to main routes,
resulting in fewer miles of primitive
routes open to the public.
The area managed for wilderness
character would include 236,791 acres,
which would provide less long-term
protection and preservation of
wilderness values than the other
alternatives. In addition, Alternative 3
would provide the least amount of
protection and preservation of historic
resources, compared to the other
alternatives.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we
received, we selected Alternative 2, our
preferred alternative, for
implementation on the Refuge.
Alternative 2 would result in the
greatest improvements to native habitat
conditions throughout the Refuge,
would best meet the Service’s policies
and directives, is compatible with the
Refuge’s purposes, and would maintain
balance among the Refuge’s varied
management needs and programs.
Public Availability of Documents
In addition to the methods in
you can view the CCP at the
following libraries.
D Lake County Public Library, 513
Center St., Lakeview, OR.
D Humboldt County Public Library,
85 East Fifth St., Winnemucca, NV.
D Washoe County Public Library, 301
South Center St., Reno, NV
ADDRESSES,
Dated: April 4, 2013.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region,
Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2013–08740 Filed 4–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNML00000 L16100000.DP000/
LXSS024G0000]
Notice of Availability of the Draft TriCounty Resource Management Plan
and Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Las Cruces District
Office, New Mexico
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
21965
Notice of availability.
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a Draft
Resource Management Plan (RMP) and
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Tri-County planning area in
the Las Cruces District Office and by
this notice is announcing the opening of
the public comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP/
Draft EIS within 90 days following the
date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its notice of the filing
of the Draft RMP/Draft EIS in the
Federal Register. The BLM will
announce future meetings or hearings
and any other public participation
activities at least 15 days in advance
through public notices, media releases,
and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the Tri-County Draft RMP/
Draft EIS by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: www.blm.gov/nm/
tricountyrmp
• Email:
BLM_NM_LCDO_comments@blm.gov
• Fax: 575–525–4412, Attention: TriCounty Comments
• Mail: BLM Las Cruces District
Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las
Cruces, New Mexico 88005–3371,
Attention: Tri-County Comments
Copies of the Tri-County Draft RMP/
Draft EIS are available at the Las Cruces
District Office, at the above address; the
New Mexico State BLM Office at 301
Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM; the
Albuquerque District BLM Office at 435
Montano Rd. NE., Albuquerque, NM;
the Socorro BLM Field Office at 901
South Highway 85, Socorro, NM; the
Carlsbad BLM Field Office at 620 East
Greene St., Carlsbad, NM; and the Pecos
District Office at 2909 West Second St.,
Roswell, NM.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Montoya, Planning and
Environmental Coordinator; telephone
575–525–4316; address 1800 Marquess
Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005–
3371; email jamontoy@blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The service is available 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21964-21965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08740]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2012-N250; 1265-0000-10137-S3]
Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge Humboldt and Washoe Counties,
NV, and Lake County, OR; Record of Decision for Final Environmental
Impact Statement
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the record of decision (ROD) for the final
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Sheldon National Wildlife
Refuge (Refuge). We completed a thorough analysis of the environmental,
social, and economic considerations and presented it in our Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and EIS, which we released to the
public on August 24, 2012.
DATES: The Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, signed the ROD on September 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of our final CCP and ROD by
any of the following methods:
Agency Web site: Download a copy of the document(s) at https://www.fws.gov/pacific/planning/main/docs/NV/docssheldon.htm.
Email: Sheldon-Hart@fws.gov. Include ``Sheldon Refuge ROD'' in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: Sheldon-Hart Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex, P.O.
Box 111, Lakeview, OR 97630.
Fax: (541) 947-4414.
In-person viewing: Copies of the final CCP/EIS and ROD may be
viewed at the Sheldon-Hart Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex,
20995 Rabbit Hill Road, Lakeview, Oregon.
Local Libraries: The final documents are also available for review
at the libraries listed under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aaron Collins, (541) 947-3315 ext.
223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we complete the CCP planning process for the
Refuge. We started this process with a Federal Register notice (73 FR
27003; May 12, 2008). We released the draft CCP/EIS to the public,
announcing and requesting comments in a notice of availability in the
Federal Register (76 FR 55937; September 9, 2011). We announced the
availability of the final CCP/EIS in the Federal Register (77 FR 51556)
on August 24, 2012.
The Refuge encompasses 575,000 acres of sagebrush-steppe habitat
located in a remote area of northwest Nevada and southeast Oregon. The
Refuge resides in the Great Basin, and was established in 1931 for the
conservation and protection of the once-imperiled American pronghorn.
Sheldon Refuge (along with the Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge)
now conserves habitat for a number of native, rare, and imperiled
species of fish, wildlife, and plants that depend upon the sagebrush-
steppe ecosystem.
In accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR
1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice announces the availability of the
ROD for the Refuge's final CCP/EIS. We completed a thorough analysis of
the environmental, social, and economic considerations, which we
included in the final CCP/EIS, and evaluated three management
alternatives for the Refuge. The ROD documents our selection of
Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, in the final CCP/EIS. The CCP
will guide us in managing and administering the Refuge for the next 15
years. Alternative 2, as we described in the final CCP/EIS and ROD, is
the foundation for the CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
(together referred to as the Refuge Administration Act), 16 U.S.C.
668dd-668ee, requires us to develop a CCP for each refuge. The purpose
for developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan
for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles
of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in
accordance with the Refuge Administration Act.
CCP Alternatives and Selected Alternatives
We identified several issues in our draft CCP/EIS. To address
these, we developed and evaluated the following Refuge management
alternatives.
Alternative 1 (No Action Alternative)
Under Alternative 1, the no-action alternative, we would assume no
change from current management; this alternative is considered the base
from which to compare the other two alternatives. We would continue to
focus our management activities on maintaining relatively stable
populations of approximately 800 feral horses and 90 feral burros on
Refuge lands. Fish populations in Big Spring Reservoir would be
maintained through continued stocking of sterile rainbow trout. Our
management of Refuge habitats would continue to include the use of
prescribed fire and mechanical treatments to achieve habitat management
objectives.
Current public uses including hunting, fishing, guiding, research,
rock collecting, wildlife observation, photography, environmental
education, and interpretation would continue. Opportunities to expand
public uses or reduce ongoing resource impacts from public uses would
be limited. Designated campgrounds and roads would be maintained at
their current locations. We would continue to protect the natural
primitive character and other resource values of the Refuge's 341,500
acres recommended for wilderness designation in 1974, and provide
opportunities for solitude and primitive recreation. Inventory,
monitoring, and cultural and historic resources protection would
continue to occur on the Refuge.
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Under Alternative 2, our preferred alternative, current fish,
wildlife, habitat, and public use management would continue, with the
following key enhancements. Native habitat conditions would improve, by
removing
[[Page 21965]]
all feral horses and burros from the Refuge within 5 years. Populations
of trout species indigenous to the region--Lahontan cutthroat trout,
Alvord cutthroat trout, or redband trout--would be maintained through
restocking if necessary, replacing nonnative rainbow trout in Big
Spring Reservoir and Virgin Creek. Control of noxious weeds and other
invasive plants would increase, including weed control along road
corridors. Western juniper would be removed where it is encroaching on
sagebrush-steppe habitats. Degraded habitats would be rehabilitated and
restored, using management techniques such as seeding, erosion control
structures, and recontouring. Abandoned livestock water developments
would be removed, and spring, playa, wet meadow, and stream habitats
would be restored to more natural conditions where beneficial to
wildlife.
Recreation opportunities would improve by relocating and enlarging
the visitor contact station, improving campground facilities,
developing an accessible interpretive trail, creating a self-guided
auto tour route, and improving signage of vehicle routes. We would
reopen existing routes, following revisions to proposed Refuge
wilderness area boundaries. Maintenance of improved gravel roads would
occur more frequently. We would relocate up to nine campgrounds, and
realign road segments to reduce erosion and impacts to sensitive
riparian areas and cultural resources. Seasonal road closures would be
implemented as appropriate, to protect sensitive species and habitats.
A larger portion of Sheldon Refuge (424,360 acres) would be
recommended for wilderness designation and managed for wilderness
character under Alternative 2, encompassing some of the lands
identified in Alternative 1, and additional wilderness study areas
identified in the 2009 Sheldon Refuge Wilderness Review. We would
increase our inventory and protection of historic and cultural
resources, and improve historic and cultural resources interpretation.
Alternative 3
Under Alternative 3, changes to current management would include
removing all feral horses and burros from the Refuge over a period of
15 years; replacing nonnative trout in Big Spring Reservoir with trout
species indigenous to the region, but not maintaining the trout
population through restocking; and managing habitats by creating
conditions where natural processes such as fire could be allowed more
frequently with less dependence on prescribed fire and other intensive
management actions. Current public uses would continue; however, some
facilities would be consolidated and some uses would be curtailed.
Vehicle access to the Refuge would be reduced under Alternative 3 due
to the closure of two roads and road maintenance limited to main
routes, resulting in fewer miles of primitive routes open to the
public.
The area managed for wilderness character would include 236,791
acres, which would provide less long-term protection and preservation
of wilderness values than the other alternatives. In addition,
Alternative 3 would provide the least amount of protection and
preservation of historic resources, compared to the other alternatives.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we received, we selected Alternative
2, our preferred alternative, for implementation on the Refuge.
Alternative 2 would result in the greatest improvements to native
habitat conditions throughout the Refuge, would best meet the Service's
policies and directives, is compatible with the Refuge's purposes, and
would maintain balance among the Refuge's varied management needs and
programs.
Public Availability of Documents
In addition to the methods in ADDRESSES, you can view the CCP at
the following libraries.
[ssquf] Lake County Public Library, 513 Center St., Lakeview, OR.
[ssquf] Humboldt County Public Library, 85 East Fifth St.,
Winnemucca, NV.
[ssquf] Washoe County Public Library, 301 South Center St., Reno,
NV
Dated: April 4, 2013.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2013-08740 Filed 4-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P