Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Three Synthetic Cannabinoids Into Schedule I, 21858-21861 [2013-08671]
Download as PDF
21858
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 4,
2013.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2013–08546 Filed 4–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–373]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of Three
Synthetic Cannabinoids Into Schedule
I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
The Deputy Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) is issuing this notice of intent to
temporarily schedule three synthetic
cannabinoids into the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA) pursuant to the
temporary scheduling provisions of 21
U.S.C. 811(h). The substances are 1pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone
(UR–144), 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-1H-indol3-yl](2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (5fluoro-UR–144; XLR11) and N-(1adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3carboxamide (APINACA, AKB48). This
action is based on a finding by the
Deputy Administrator that the
placement of these synthetic
cannabinoids into Schedule I of the CSA
is necessary to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety. Any final
order will be published in the Federal
Register and may not be issued prior to
May 13, 2013. Any final order will
impose the administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions and regulatory
controls of Schedule I substances under
the CSA on the manufacture,
distribution, possession, importation,
and exportation of these synthetic
cannabinoids.
SUMMARY:
John
W. Partridge, Executive Assistant, Office
of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152, telephone (202) 307–7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Section 201 of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
811) provides the Attorney General with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
the authority to temporarily place a
substance into Schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if he
finds that such action is necessary to
avoid imminent hazard to the public
safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h). In addition, if
proceedings to control a substance are
initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the
Attorney General may extend the
temporary scheduling up to one year.
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under section 202 of the CSA
(21 U.S.C. 812) or if there is no
exemption or approval in effect under
section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
355) for the substance. The Attorney
General has delegated his authority
under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the
Administrator of DEA, who in turn has
delegated her authority to the Deputy
Administrator of DEA. 28 CFR 0.100,
Appendix to Subpart R.
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA (21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4)) requires the Deputy
Administrator to notify the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) of his intention to
temporarily place a substance into
Schedule I of the CSA.1 The Deputy
Administrator has transmitted notice of
his intent to place UR–144, XLR11, and
AKB48 in Schedule I on a temporary
basis to the Assistant Secretary by letter
dated February 14, 2013. The Assistant
Secretary responded to this notice by
letter dated March 14, 2013 (received by
DEA on March 21, 2013), and advised
that based on review by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), there are
currently no investigational new drug
applications or approved new drug
applications for UR–144, XLR11, or
AKB48. The Assistant Secretary also
stated that HHS has no objection to the
temporary placement of UR–144, XLR11
or AKB48 into Schedule I of the CSA.
DEA has taken into consideration the
Assistant Secretary’s comments. As UR–
144, XLR11, and AKB48 are not
currently listed in any schedule under
the CSA, and as no exemptions or
approvals are in effect for UR–144,
1 Because the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) has delegated to
the Assistant Secretary for Health the Department
of Health and Human Services the authority to
make domestic drug scheduling recommendations,
for purposes of this Notice of Intent, all subsequent
references to ‘‘Secretary’’ have been replaced with
‘‘Assistant Secretary.’’ As set forth in a
memorandum of understanding entered into by
HHS, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and
the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), FDA
acts as the lead agency within HHS in carrying out
the Secretary’s scheduling responsibilities under
the Controlled Substance Act (CSA), with the
concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
XLR11, and AKB48 under Section 505
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355), DEA
believes that the conditions of 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1) have been satisfied. Any
additional comments submitted by the
Assistant Secretary in response to this
notification shall also be taken into
consideration before a final order is
published. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4).
To make a finding that placing a
substance temporarily into Schedule I of
the CSA is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety,
the Deputy Administrator is required to
consider three of the eight factors set
forth in section 201(c) of the CSA (21
U.S.C. 811(c)). These factors are as
follows: the substance’s history and
current pattern of abuse; the scope,
duration and significance of abuse; and
what, if any, risk there is to the public
health. 21 U.S.C. 811(c)(4)–(6).
Consideration of these factors includes
actual abuse, diversion from legitimate
channels, and clandestine importation,
manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling
(21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1)) may only be placed
in Schedule I. Substances in Schedule I
are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States
(U.S.), and a lack of accepted safety for
use under medical supervision. 21
U.S.C. 812(b)(1). Available data and
information for UR–144, XLR11, and
AKB48 indicate that these three
synthetic cannabinoids have a high
potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
U.S., and a lack of accepted safety for
use under medical supervision.
Synthetic Cannabinoids
While synthetic cannabinoids have
been developed over the last 30 years
for research purposes to investigate the
cannabinoid system, no scientific
literature referring to UR–144, XLR11 or
AKB48 was available prior to these
drugs identification in the illicit market.
In addition, no legitimate non-research
uses have been identified for these
synthetic cannabinoids nor have they
been approved by FDA for human
consumption. These synthetic
cannabinoids, of which 1-pentyl-1Hindol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone
(UR–144), 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-1H-indol3-yl](2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (5fluoro-UR–144; XLR11), and N-(1adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3carboxamide (APINACA, AKB48) are
representative, are so-termed for their
D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)—like
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
pharmacological properties. Numerous
herbal products have been analyzed,
and UR–144, XLR11, and AKB48 have
been identified, in varying mixture
profiles and amounts, spiked on plant
material.
From January 2009 through January
24, 2013, according to the System to
Retrieve Information from Drug
Evidence (STRIDE) data, there are 1,074
reports involving 137 cases for UR–144,
773 reports involving 134 cases for
XLR11, and 66 reports involving 25
cases for AKB48. From March 2010 to
January 29, 2013, the National Forensic
Laboratory Information System (NFLIS)
registered 9,346 reports containing these
synthetic cannabinoids (UR–144—4,387
reports; XLR11—4,516 reports;
AKB48—443 reports) across 32 states.
No instances regarding UR–144, XLR11
or AKB48 were reported in NFLIS prior
to March of 2010. Collectively, reports
from NFLIS and (STRIDE) 2 (11,259
reports total through January 29, 2013)
for UR–144, XLR11 and AKB48 have
exceeded the number of reports for the
five synthetic cannabinoid substances
(JWH–018, JWH–200, JWH–073, CP–
47,497 and CP–47,497 C8 homologue
[cannabicyclohexanol]) (7,340 total
reports through December 31, 2012).
JWH–018, JWH–200, JWH–073, CP–
47,497 and CP–47,497 C8 homologue
were temporarily scheduled on March 1,
2011, and later placed in Schedule I by
Section 1152 of Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act (FDASIA), Pub. L. 112–144, on July
9, 2012. Section 1152 of the FDASIA 3
amended the CSA by placing
cannabimimetic agents and 26 specific
substances (including 15 synthetic
cannabinoids, 2 synthetic cathinones,
and 9 phenethylamines of the 2C-series)
in Schedule I. UR–144, XLR11, and
AKB48 were not included among the 15
specific named synthetic cannabinoids,
and do not fall under the definition of
cannabimimetic agents, under FDASIA.
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of
Abuse
Synthetic cannabinoids laced on plant
material were first reported in the U.S.
in December 2008, when a shipment of
2 National Forensic Laboratory Information
System (NFLIS) is a program sponsored by Drug
Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) Office of
Diversion Control which compiles information on
exhibits analyzed in State and local law
enforcement laboratories. System to Retrieve
Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) is a DEA
database which compiles information on exhibits
analyzed in DEA laboratories.
3 Subtitle D of Title XI of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation Act
(FDASIA), which includes Sections 1151–1153 of
Pub. L. 112–144, is also known as the ‘‘Synthetic
Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2012,’’ or ‘‘SDAPA.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
‘Spice’ was seized and analyzed by U.S.
Customs and Border Patrol in Dayton,
Ohio. Also in December 2008, JWH–018
and cannabicyclohexanol were
identified by German forensic
laboratories.
Since the initial identification of
JWH–018 (December 2008), many
additional synthetic cannabinoids with
purported psychotropic effects have
been found laced on plant material or
related products. The popularity of
these synthetic cannabinoids and their
associated products appears to have
increased since January 2010 in the U.S.
based on seizure exhibits and media
reports. This trend appears to mirror
that experienced in Europe since 2008.
Synthetic cannabinoids are being
encountered in several regions of the
U.S. with the substances primarily
found as adulterants on plant material
products as self-reported on internet
discussion boards. Since then,
numerous other synthetic cannabinoids
including UR–144, XLR11 and AKB48
have been identified as product
adulterants.
Data gathered from published studies,
supplemented by discussions on
Internet discussion Web sites and
personal communications with
toxicological testing laboratories,
demonstrate that products laced with
UR–144, XLR11 and/or AKB48 are being
abused mainly by smoking for their
psychoactive properties. The
adulterated products are marketed as
‘legal’ alternatives to marijuana. This
characterization, along with their
reputation as potent herbal intoxicants,
has increased their popularity. Several
synthetic cannabinoids have been
shown to display higher potency in
vitro when compared to THC. Smoking
mixtures of these substances for the
purpose of achieving intoxication has
been identified as a reason for numerous
emergency room visits and calls to
poison control centers. Abuse of these
synthetic cannabinoids and their
products has been characterized with
both acute and long term public health
and safety issues. In addition, numerous
states, local jurisdictions, and the
international community have
controlled these substances.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and
Significance of Abuse
According to forensic laboratory
reports, the first appearance of synthetic
cannabinoids in the U.S. occurred in
November 2008, when U.S. Customs
and Border Protection analyzed ‘‘Spice’’
products. NFLIS has reported 9,346
exhibits (March 2010 to January 29,
2013) related to UR–144, XLR11 and
AKB48 from various states including
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21859
Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, California,
Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa,
Indiana, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota,
Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New Mexico, North Dakota, Nebraska,
Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,
Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
STRIDE has reported 1,913 records
involving UR–144, XLR11 and AKB48
from January 2009 through January 24,
2013. From January 1 through December
31, 2012, the American Association of
Poison Control Centers 4 has reported
receiving in excess of 5,200 calls
relating to products purportedly laced
with synthetic cannabinoids. Although
the center does not identify specific
cannabinoid substances, the data does
indicate the magnitude of exposure to
synthetic cannabinoids.
Factor 6. What, If Any, Risk There Is
to the Public Health
UR–144, XLR11 and AKB48 are
pharmacologically similar to Schedule I
substances THC and JWH–018, as well
as other synthetic cannabinoids. By
sharing pharmacological similarities
with the Schedule I substances (THC
and JWH–018), synthetic cannabinoids
pose a risk to the abuser. In addition,
the chronic abuse of products laced
with synthetic cannabinoids has also
been linked to addiction and
withdrawal. Law enforcement, military,
and public health officials have reported
exposure incidents that demonstrate the
dangers associated with abuse of
synthetic cannabinoids to both the
individual abusers and other affected
individuals since these substances were
never intended for human use.
Warnings regarding the dangers
associated with abuse of synthetic
cannabinoids and their products have
been issued by numerous state public
health departments and poison control
centers and private organizations. In a
2012 report, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration 5
reported 11,406 emergency department
visits involving a synthetic cannabinoid
product during 2010.
Detailed product analyses have
detected variations in the amount and
type of synthetic cannabinoid laced on
plant material even within samplings of
4 American Association of Poison Control Centers
(AAPCC) is a non-profit, national organization that
represents the poison centers of the United States.
5 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) is a branch of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
It is charged with improving the quality and
availability of prevention, treatment, and
rehabilitative services in order to reduce illness,
death, disability, and cost to society resulting from
substance abuse and mental illnesses.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
21860
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the same product. Since abusers obtain
these drugs through unknown sources,
purity of these drugs is uncertain, thus
posing significant adverse health risk to
these users. Submissions to DEA
laboratories from January 2012 through
February 11, 2013, have documented
over 142 distinct packaging examples
containing a mixture of UR–144, XLR11
and/or AKB48. These unknown factors
present a significant risk of danger to
the abuser. Some of the adverse health
effects reported in response to the abuse
of synthetic cannabinoids include
vomiting, anxiety, agitation, irritability,
seizures, hallucinations, tachycardia,
elevated blood pressure, and loss of
consciousness. As mentioned above,
there are reported instances of
emergency department admissions in
association with the abuse of these THClike substances. There are no recognized
therapeutic uses of these substances in
the U.S.
In February 2013, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention
published a report by Murphy et al.
describing unexplained cases of acute
kidney injury in 16 patients, all of
whom had reported recent smoking of
synthetic cannabinoids. Upon further
investigation, it was determined that of
the 16 patients, 7 of the subjects had
smoked substances that were positive
for XLR11 or its metabolite. Cases were
reported from Wyoming (4 cases),
Rhode Island (1 case), New York (2
cases), Oregon (6 cases), Kansas (1 case)
and Oklahoma (2 cases).
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I
Scheduling To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
Based on the above data and
information, the continued uncontrolled
manufacture, distribution, importation,
exportation, and abuse of UR–144,
XLR11, and AKB48 pose an imminent
hazard to the public safety. DEA is not
aware of any currently accepted medical
uses for these synthetic cannabinoids in
the U.S. A substance meeting the
statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling (21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1)) may
only be placed in Schedule I.
Substances in Schedule I are those that
have a high potential for abuse, no
currently accepted medical use in
treatment in the U.S., and a lack of
accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. Available data and
information for UR–144, XLR11, and
AKB48 indicate that these three
synthetic cannabinoids have a high
potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
U.S., and a lack of accepted safety for
use under medical supervision. As
required by section 201(h)(4) of the CSA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
(21 U.S.C. 811(h)), the Deputy
Administrator through a letter dated
February 14, 2013, notified the Assistant
Secretary of Health of the intention to
temporarily place these three synthetic
cannabinoids in Schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates
expedited temporary scheduling action
and provides the 30-day notice pursuant
to section 201(h) of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
811(h)). In accordance with the
provisions of section 201(h) of the CSA
(21 U.S.C. 811(h)), the Deputy
Administrator has considered available
data and information and has set forth
herein the grounds for his determination
that it is necessary to temporarily
schedule three synthetic cannabinoids,
1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (UR144), 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-1H-indol-3yl](2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (5fluoro-UR-144; XLR11), and N-(1adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3carboxamide (APINACA, AKB48) in
Schedule I of the CSA and finds that
placement of these synthetic
cannabinoids into Schedule I of the CSA
is warranted in order to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
Because the Deputy Administrator
hereby finds that it is necessary to
temporarily place these synthetic
cannabinoids into Schedule I to avoid
an imminent hazard to the public safety,
any subsequent final order temporarily
scheduling these substances will be
effective on the date of publication in
the Federal Register, and will be in
effect for a period of up to three years
pending completion of the permanent or
regular scheduling process. It is the
intention of the Deputy Administrator to
issue such a final order as soon as
possible after the expiration of 30 days
from the date of publication of this
notice. UR–144, XLR11, and AKB48 will
then be subject to the regulatory
controls and administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions applicable to the
manufacture, distribution, possession,
importing and exporting of a Schedule
I controlled substance under the CSA.
Regular scheduling actions in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) are
subject to formal rulemaking procedures
done ‘‘on the record after opportunity
for a hearing’’ conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for
scheduling a drug or other substance.
While temporary scheduling orders are
not subject to judicial review (21 U.S.C.
811(h)(6)), the regular scheduling
process of formal rulemaking affords
interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any
additional relevant information needed
to make a determination. Final
decisions which conclude the regular
scheduling process of formal
rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877.
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
811(h)) provides for an expedited
temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
As provided in this subsection, the
Attorney General may, by order,
schedule a substance in schedule I on a
temporary basis. Such an order may not
be issued before the expiration of 30
days from (1) the publication of a notice
in the Federal Register of the intention
to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued,
and (2) the date that notice of a
proposed temporary scheduling order is
transmitted to the Secretary of HHS. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the
CSA directs that temporary scheduling
actions be issued by order and sets forth
the procedures by which such orders are
to be issued, DEA believes that the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) do
not apply to this notice of intent. In the
alternative, even assuming that this
notice of intent might be deemed to be
subject to section 553 of the APA, the
Deputy Administrator finds that there is
good cause to forgo the notice and
comment requirements of section 553,
as any further delays in the process for
issuance of temporary scheduling orders
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest in view of the
manifest urgency of the temporary
scheduling action to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
Although this notice of intent to issue
a temporary scheduling order is not
subject to the notice and comment
requirements of section 553 of the APA,
DEA notes that in accordance with 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Deputy
Administrator will be taking into
consideration any comments submitted
by the Secretary of HHS with regard to
the proposed temporary scheduling
order. Further, DEA believes that this
temporary scheduling action is not a
‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2),
and, accordingly, not subject to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The requirements for the
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are
not applicable where (as here) the
agency is not required by section 553 of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
21861
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the APA or any other law to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866 ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’, section 3(f), and,
accordingly, this action has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
‘‘Federalism’’ it is determined that this
action does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Under the authority vested in the
Attorney General by section 201(h) of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(h)), and
delegated to the Deputy Administrator
of the DEA by Department of Justice
regulations (28 CFR 0.100, Appendix to
Subpart R), the Deputy Administrator
hereby intends to order that 21 CFR Part
1308 be amended as follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for Part 1308
continues to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 1308.11 is amended by
adding new paragraphs (h)(9), (10), and
(11) to read as follows:
25 CFR Part 170
[BY–/AM65P0002.99900/]
■
§ 1308.11
Schedule I.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(9) 1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone, its
optical, positional, and geometric
isomers, salts and salts of isomers—
7144 (Other names: UR-144, 1-pentyl-3(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropoyl)indole)
(10) 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-1H-indol-3yl](2,2,3,3tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone, its
optical, positional, and geometric
isomers, salts and salts of isomers—
7011 (Other names: 5-fluoro-UR-144, 5F-UR-144, XLR11, 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-3(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropoyl)indole)
(11) N-(1-adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1Hindazole-3-carboxamide, its optical,
positional, and geometric isomers, salts
and salts of isomers—7048 (Other
names: APINACA, AKB48)
Dated: April 5, 2013.
Thomas M. Harrigan,
Deputy Administrator.
Tribal Consultation on the Draft
Regulations Governing the Tribal
Transportation Program
AGENCY:
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
Notice of Tribal Consultations
and Informational Meetings.
ACTION:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
is announcing tribal consultations to
discuss draft revisions of the regulations
governing the Tribal Transportation
Program. The consultations will also
cover requirements for proposed roads
and access roads to be included in the
National Tribal Transportation Facility
Inventory and will include an update
regarding the ongoing quality assurance
review of the facility inventory.
SUMMARY:
Comments on the draft rule are
due by June 14, 2013. The consultation
sessions will be held on the following
dates, at the following locations:
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2013–08671 Filed 4–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
Meeting date
Location
May 14, 2013 ..................................................
May 16, 2013 ..................................................
May 21, 2013 ..................................................
Anchorage, AK ...........................................................................................
Phoenix, AZ ...............................................................................................
Minneapolis, MN ........................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
• Send comments to: LeRoy M. Gishi,
Chief, Division of Transportation,
Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street,
NW., MS–4513, Washington, DC 20240,
telephone (202) 513–7711, email:
leroy.gishi@bia.gov; or Robert W.
Sparrow, Jr., Director, Tribal
Transportation Program, Federal
Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave, SE., Room E61–311,
Washington, DC 20159, telephone (202)
366–9483, email:
robert.sparrow@dot.gov.
• Addresses of the venues at which
each meeting will be held, a copy of the
draft regulation, and background
information are posted at the following
Web site (the address is case-sensitive,
please use capitals where indicated):
https://www.bia.gov/WhoWeAre/BIA/
OIS/Transportation.
LeRoy M. Gishi, telephone (202) 513–
7711; email: leroy.gishi@bia.gov; or
Robert W. Sparrow, Jr., telephone (202)
366–9483; email:
robert.sparrow@dot.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
Federally
recognized tribes are invited to attend
one or more of the consultation and
informational sessions regarding the
following topics:
• On July 6, 2012, Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP–
21), Public Law 112–141, a two-year
reauthorization of the transportation act,
was signed into law by President Obama
and became effective on October 1,
2012.
• Section 1119 of MAP–21 struck the
existing laws governing the Indian
Reservation Roads Program from 23
U.S.C. 201–204, and renumbered many
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Time
9 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
9 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
9 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
of those sections under 23 U.S.C. 201
and 202 and changed the name from
‘‘Indian Reservation Roads Program’’ to
‘‘Tribal Transportation Program (TTP).’’
MAP–21 also changed the name of the
‘‘Indian Reservation Roads Inventory’’
to the ‘‘National Tribal Transportation
Program Facility Inventory (NTTFI).’’
See 23 U.S.C. 202(b)(1). Section 1103 of
MAP–21 amended the name of an
‘‘Indian Reservation Road’’ to a ‘‘Tribal
Transportation Facility.’’
• Section 1119 of MAP–21 created a
new formula for distribution of TTP
funds among tribes, which had the
effect of overriding the existing Relative
Need Distribution Formula (RNDF) that
was published in 2004 at 25 CFR part
170, Subpart C. See 23 U.S.C. 202(b)(3).
Although the RNDF is no longer
applicable under the new TTP formula,
certain historical aspects of the former
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21858-21861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08671]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-373]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Three
Synthetic Cannabinoids Into Schedule I
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) is issuing this notice of intent to temporarily
schedule three synthetic cannabinoids into the Controlled Substances
Act (CSA) pursuant to the temporary scheduling provisions of 21 U.S.C.
811(h). The substances are 1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3-
tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (UR-144), 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-1H-
indol-3-yl](2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (5-fluoro-UR-144;
XLR11) and N-(1-adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (APINACA,
AKB48). This action is based on a finding by the Deputy Administrator
that the placement of these synthetic cannabinoids into Schedule I of
the CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
Any final order will be published in the Federal Register and may not
be issued prior to May 13, 2013. Any final order will impose the
administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions and regulatory controls
of Schedule I substances under the CSA on the manufacture,
distribution, possession, importation, and exportation of these
synthetic cannabinoids.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John W. Partridge, Executive
Assistant, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield,
Virginia 22152, telephone (202) 307-7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 201 of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811) provides the Attorney
General with the authority to temporarily place a substance into
Schedule I of the CSA for two years without regard to the requirements
of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if he finds that such action is necessary to avoid
imminent hazard to the public safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h). In addition, if
proceedings to control a substance are initiated under 21 U.S.C.
811(a)(1), the Attorney General may extend the temporary scheduling up
to one year.
Where the necessary findings are made, a substance may be
temporarily scheduled if it is not listed in any other schedule under
section 202 of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 812) or if there is no exemption or
approval in effect under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355) for the substance. The Attorney
General has delegated his authority under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the
Administrator of DEA, who in turn has delegated her authority to the
Deputy Administrator of DEA. 28 CFR 0.100, Appendix to Subpart R.
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4)) requires the
Deputy Administrator to notify the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) of his intention to temporarily place a
substance into Schedule I of the CSA.\1\ The Deputy Administrator has
transmitted notice of his intent to place UR-144, XLR11, and AKB48 in
Schedule I on a temporary basis to the Assistant Secretary by letter
dated February 14, 2013. The Assistant Secretary responded to this
notice by letter dated March 14, 2013 (received by DEA on March 21,
2013), and advised that based on review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are currently no investigational new drug
applications or approved new drug applications for UR-144, XLR11, or
AKB48. The Assistant Secretary also stated that HHS has no objection to
the temporary placement of UR-144, XLR11 or AKB48 into Schedule I of
the CSA. DEA has taken into consideration the Assistant Secretary's
comments. As UR-144, XLR11, and AKB48 are not currently listed in any
schedule under the CSA, and as no exemptions or approvals are in effect
for UR-144, XLR11, and AKB48 under Section 505 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355), DEA believes that the conditions of 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1)
have been satisfied. Any additional comments submitted by the Assistant
Secretary in response to this notification shall also be taken into
consideration before a final order is published. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has delegated to the Assistant Secretary for Health
the Department of Health and Human Services the authority to make
domestic drug scheduling recommendations, for purposes of this
Notice of Intent, all subsequent references to ``Secretary'' have
been replaced with ``Assistant Secretary.'' As set forth in a
memorandum of understanding entered into by HHS, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and the National Institute on Drug Abuse
(NIDA), FDA acts as the lead agency within HHS in carrying out the
Secretary's scheduling responsibilities under the Controlled
Substance Act (CSA), with the concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To make a finding that placing a substance temporarily into
Schedule I of the CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the
public safety, the Deputy Administrator is required to consider three
of the eight factors set forth in section 201(c) of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
811(c)). These factors are as follows: the substance's history and
current pattern of abuse; the scope, duration and significance of
abuse; and what, if any, risk there is to the public health. 21 U.S.C.
811(c)(4)-(6). Consideration of these factors includes actual abuse,
diversion from legitimate channels, and clandestine importation,
manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling (21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1)) may only be placed in Schedule I.
Substances in Schedule I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States (U.S.), and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1). Available data and information for
UR-144, XLR11, and AKB48 indicate that these three synthetic
cannabinoids have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the U.S., and a lack of accepted safety for
use under medical supervision.
Synthetic Cannabinoids
While synthetic cannabinoids have been developed over the last 30
years for research purposes to investigate the cannabinoid system, no
scientific literature referring to UR-144, XLR11 or AKB48 was available
prior to these drugs identification in the illicit market. In addition,
no legitimate non-research uses have been identified for these
synthetic cannabinoids nor have they been approved by FDA for human
consumption. These synthetic cannabinoids, of which 1-pentyl-1H-indol-
3-yl)(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (UR-144), 1-(5-fluoro-
pentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl](2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (5-
fluoro-UR-144; XLR11), and N-(1-adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-
carboxamide (APINACA, AKB48) are representative, are so-termed for
their [Delta]\9\-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)--like
[[Page 21859]]
pharmacological properties. Numerous herbal products have been
analyzed, and UR-144, XLR11, and AKB48 have been identified, in varying
mixture profiles and amounts, spiked on plant material.
From January 2009 through January 24, 2013, according to the System
to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) data, there are
1,074 reports involving 137 cases for UR-144, 773 reports involving 134
cases for XLR11, and 66 reports involving 25 cases for AKB48. From
March 2010 to January 29, 2013, the National Forensic Laboratory
Information System (NFLIS) registered 9,346 reports containing these
synthetic cannabinoids (UR-144--4,387 reports; XLR11--4,516 reports;
AKB48--443 reports) across 32 states. No instances regarding UR-144,
XLR11 or AKB48 were reported in NFLIS prior to March of 2010.
Collectively, reports from NFLIS and (STRIDE) \2\ (11,259 reports total
through January 29, 2013) for UR-144, XLR11 and AKB48 have exceeded the
number of reports for the five synthetic cannabinoid substances (JWH-
018, JWH-200, JWH-073, CP-47,497 and CP-47,497 C8 homologue
[cannabicyclohexanol]) (7,340 total reports through December 31, 2012).
JWH-018, JWH-200, JWH-073, CP-47,497 and CP-47,497 C8 homologue were
temporarily scheduled on March 1, 2011, and later placed in Schedule I
by Section 1152 of Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation
Act (FDASIA), Pub. L. 112-144, on July 9, 2012. Section 1152 of the
FDASIA \3\ amended the CSA by placing cannabimimetic agents and 26
specific substances (including 15 synthetic cannabinoids, 2 synthetic
cathinones, and 9 phenethylamines of the 2C-series) in Schedule I. UR-
144, XLR11, and AKB48 were not included among the 15 specific named
synthetic cannabinoids, and do not fall under the definition of
cannabimimetic agents, under FDASIA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) is a
program sponsored by Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) Office
of Diversion Control which compiles information on exhibits analyzed
in State and local law enforcement laboratories. System to Retrieve
Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) is a DEA database which
compiles information on exhibits analyzed in DEA laboratories.
\3\ Subtitle D of Title XI of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), which includes Sections 1151-
1153 of Pub. L. 112-144, is also known as the ``Synthetic Drug Abuse
Prevention Act of 2012,'' or ``SDAPA.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of Abuse
Synthetic cannabinoids laced on plant material were first reported
in the U.S. in December 2008, when a shipment of `Spice' was seized and
analyzed by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol in Dayton, Ohio. Also in
December 2008, JWH-018 and cannabicyclohexanol were identified by
German forensic laboratories.
Since the initial identification of JWH-018 (December 2008), many
additional synthetic cannabinoids with purported psychotropic effects
have been found laced on plant material or related products. The
popularity of these synthetic cannabinoids and their associated
products appears to have increased since January 2010 in the U.S. based
on seizure exhibits and media reports. This trend appears to mirror
that experienced in Europe since 2008. Synthetic cannabinoids are being
encountered in several regions of the U.S. with the substances
primarily found as adulterants on plant material products as self-
reported on internet discussion boards. Since then, numerous other
synthetic cannabinoids including UR-144, XLR11 and AKB48 have been
identified as product adulterants.
Data gathered from published studies, supplemented by discussions
on Internet discussion Web sites and personal communications with
toxicological testing laboratories, demonstrate that products laced
with UR-144, XLR11 and/or AKB48 are being abused mainly by smoking for
their psychoactive properties. The adulterated products are marketed as
`legal' alternatives to marijuana. This characterization, along with
their reputation as potent herbal intoxicants, has increased their
popularity. Several synthetic cannabinoids have been shown to display
higher potency in vitro when compared to THC. Smoking mixtures of these
substances for the purpose of achieving intoxication has been
identified as a reason for numerous emergency room visits and calls to
poison control centers. Abuse of these synthetic cannabinoids and their
products has been characterized with both acute and long term public
health and safety issues. In addition, numerous states, local
jurisdictions, and the international community have controlled these
substances.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and Significance of Abuse
According to forensic laboratory reports, the first appearance of
synthetic cannabinoids in the U.S. occurred in November 2008, when U.S.
Customs and Border Protection analyzed ``Spice'' products. NFLIS has
reported 9,346 exhibits (March 2010 to January 29, 2013) related to UR-
144, XLR11 and AKB48 from various states including Alaska, Alabama,
Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Indiana,
Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Nebraska, Nevada,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,
Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. STRIDE has reported 1,913 records
involving UR-144, XLR11 and AKB48 from January 2009 through January 24,
2013. From January 1 through December 31, 2012, the American
Association of Poison Control Centers \4\ has reported receiving in
excess of 5,200 calls relating to products purportedly laced with
synthetic cannabinoids. Although the center does not identify specific
cannabinoid substances, the data does indicate the magnitude of
exposure to synthetic cannabinoids.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) is a
non-profit, national organization that represents the poison centers
of the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 6. What, If Any, Risk There Is to the Public Health
UR-144, XLR11 and AKB48 are pharmacologically similar to Schedule I
substances THC and JWH-018, as well as other synthetic cannabinoids. By
sharing pharmacological similarities with the Schedule I substances
(THC and JWH-018), synthetic cannabinoids pose a risk to the abuser. In
addition, the chronic abuse of products laced with synthetic
cannabinoids has also been linked to addiction and withdrawal. Law
enforcement, military, and public health officials have reported
exposure incidents that demonstrate the dangers associated with abuse
of synthetic cannabinoids to both the individual abusers and other
affected individuals since these substances were never intended for
human use. Warnings regarding the dangers associated with abuse of
synthetic cannabinoids and their products have been issued by numerous
state public health departments and poison control centers and private
organizations. In a 2012 report, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration \5\ reported 11,406 emergency department visits
involving a synthetic cannabinoid product during 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) is a branch of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS). It is charged with improving the quality and
availability of prevention, treatment, and rehabilitative services
in order to reduce illness, death, disability, and cost to society
resulting from substance abuse and mental illnesses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detailed product analyses have detected variations in the amount
and type of synthetic cannabinoid laced on plant material even within
samplings of
[[Page 21860]]
the same product. Since abusers obtain these drugs through unknown
sources, purity of these drugs is uncertain, thus posing significant
adverse health risk to these users. Submissions to DEA laboratories
from January 2012 through February 11, 2013, have documented over 142
distinct packaging examples containing a mixture of UR-144, XLR11 and/
or AKB48. These unknown factors present a significant risk of danger to
the abuser. Some of the adverse health effects reported in response to
the abuse of synthetic cannabinoids include vomiting, anxiety,
agitation, irritability, seizures, hallucinations, tachycardia,
elevated blood pressure, and loss of consciousness. As mentioned above,
there are reported instances of emergency department admissions in
association with the abuse of these THC-like substances. There are no
recognized therapeutic uses of these substances in the U.S.
In February 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
published a report by Murphy et al. describing unexplained cases of
acute kidney injury in 16 patients, all of whom had reported recent
smoking of synthetic cannabinoids. Upon further investigation, it was
determined that of the 16 patients, 7 of the subjects had smoked
substances that were positive for XLR11 or its metabolite. Cases were
reported from Wyoming (4 cases), Rhode Island (1 case), New York (2
cases), Oregon (6 cases), Kansas (1 case) and Oklahoma (2 cases).
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I Scheduling To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
Based on the above data and information, the continued uncontrolled
manufacture, distribution, importation, exportation, and abuse of UR-
144, XLR11, and AKB48 pose an imminent hazard to the public safety. DEA
is not aware of any currently accepted medical uses for these synthetic
cannabinoids in the U.S. A substance meeting the statutory requirements
for temporary scheduling (21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1)) may only be placed in
Schedule I. Substances in Schedule I are those that have a high
potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in
the U.S., and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. Available data and information for UR-144, XLR11, and
AKB48 indicate that these three synthetic cannabinoids have a high
potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in
the U.S., and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. As required by section 201(h)(4) of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
811(h)), the Deputy Administrator through a letter dated February 14,
2013, notified the Assistant Secretary of Health of the intention to
temporarily place these three synthetic cannabinoids in Schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates expedited temporary scheduling
action and provides the 30-day notice pursuant to section 201(h) of the
CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(h)). In accordance with the provisions of section
201(h) of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(h)), the Deputy Administrator has
considered available data and information and has set forth herein the
grounds for his determination that it is necessary to temporarily
schedule three synthetic cannabinoids, 1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3-
tetramethylcyclopropyl) methanone (UR-144), 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-1H-
indol-3-yl](2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone (5-fluoro-UR-144;
XLR11), and N-(1-adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide
(APINACA, AKB48) in Schedule I of the CSA and finds that placement of
these synthetic cannabinoids into Schedule I of the CSA is warranted in
order to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
Because the Deputy Administrator hereby finds that it is necessary
to temporarily place these synthetic cannabinoids into Schedule I to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety, any subsequent final
order temporarily scheduling these substances will be effective on the
date of publication in the Federal Register, and will be in effect for
a period of up to three years pending completion of the permanent or
regular scheduling process. It is the intention of the Deputy
Administrator to issue such a final order as soon as possible after the
expiration of 30 days from the date of publication of this notice. UR-
144, XLR11, and AKB48 will then be subject to the regulatory controls
and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to the
manufacture, distribution, possession, importing and exporting of a
Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA.
Regular scheduling actions in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) are
subject to formal rulemaking procedures done ``on the record after
opportunity for a hearing'' conducted pursuant to the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 556 and 557. The CSA sets forth specific criteria for scheduling
a drug or other substance. While temporary scheduling orders are not
subject to judicial review (21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6)), the regular
scheduling process of formal rulemaking affords interested parties with
appropriate process and the government with any additional relevant
information needed to make a determination. Final decisions which
conclude the regular scheduling process of formal rulemaking are
subject to judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 877.
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(h)) provides for an
expedited temporary scheduling action where such action is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. As provided in this
subsection, the Attorney General may, by order, schedule a substance in
schedule I on a temporary basis. Such an order may not be issued before
the expiration of 30 days from (1) the publication of a notice in the
Federal Register of the intention to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued, and (2) the date that notice of
a proposed temporary scheduling order is transmitted to the Secretary
of HHS. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the CSA directs that temporary
scheduling actions be issued by order and sets forth the procedures by
which such orders are to be issued, DEA believes that the notice and
comment requirements of section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) do not apply to this notice of intent. In the
alternative, even assuming that this notice of intent might be deemed
to be subject to section 553 of the APA, the Deputy Administrator finds
that there is good cause to forgo the notice and comment requirements
of section 553, as any further delays in the process for issuance of
temporary scheduling orders would be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest in view of the manifest urgency of the temporary
scheduling action to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
Although this notice of intent to issue a temporary scheduling
order is not subject to the notice and comment requirements of section
553 of the APA, DEA notes that in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4),
the Deputy Administrator will be taking into consideration any comments
submitted by the Secretary of HHS with regard to the proposed temporary
scheduling order. Further, DEA believes that this temporary scheduling
action is not a ``rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2), and,
accordingly, not subject to the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The requirements for the preparation of an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are not applicable
where (as here) the agency is not required by section 553 of
[[Page 21861]]
the APA or any other law to publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 ``Regulatory Planning and Review'',
section 3(f), and, accordingly, this action has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132
``Federalism'' it is determined that this action does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Under the authority vested in the Attorney General by section
201(h) of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(h)), and delegated to the Deputy
Administrator of the DEA by Department of Justice regulations (28 CFR
0.100, Appendix to Subpart R), the Deputy Administrator hereby intends
to order that 21 CFR Part 1308 be amended as follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for Part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Section 1308.11 is amended by adding new paragraphs (h)(9), (10),
and (11) to read as follows:
Sec. 1308.11 Schedule I.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(9) 1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3-
tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone, its optical, positional, and
geometric isomers, salts and salts of isomers--7144 (Other names: UR-
144, 1-pentyl-3-(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropoyl)indole)
(10) 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl](2,2,3,3-
tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone, its optical, positional, and
geometric isomers, salts and salts of isomers--7011 (Other names: 5-
fluoro-UR-144, 5-F-UR-144, XLR11, 1-(5-fluoro-pentyl)-3-(2,2,3,3-
tetramethylcyclopropoyl)indole)
(11) N-(1-adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide, its
optical, positional, and geometric isomers, salts and salts of
isomers--7048 (Other names: APINACA, AKB48)
Dated: April 5, 2013.
Thomas M. Harrigan,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-08671 Filed 4-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P