Submission for OMB Review; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery (GSA), 21952-21953 [2013-08656]
Download as PDF
21952
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Notices
where the information is not knowingly
conveyed to Respondents or their
representatives (e.g., competitive
intelligence).
In addition, Paragraph III. of the
proposed Order requires Respondents to
institute programs to ensure compliance
with the proposed Order and U.S.
antitrust laws. Paragraph III. requires:
(1) Annual antitrust compliance training
for all Bosley officers, executives,
employees, and agents whose positions
entail contact with competitors or who
have sales, marketing, or pricing
responsibility for Respondents’
management of medical/surgical hair
transplantation practice; (2) the
provision of legal support to respond to
any questions regarding antitrust
compliance or U.S. antitrust laws; and
(3) document retention sufficient to
record compliance with Respondents’
obligations under the proposed Order.
Paragraph IV. requires Respondents to
submit periodic compliance reports to
the Commission. Respondents must
provide an initial compliance report
within sixty (60) days from the date the
Order becomes final and annually
thereafter for the next four (4) years or
upon written notice by the Commission.
Pursuant to Paragraph V. of the
proposed Order, Respondents must also
provide notice to the Commission thirty
(30) days prior to any planned
dissolution, acquisition, or other change
that may affect compliance obligations
arising from the proposed Order.
Paragraph VI. gives the Commission
access, upon five (5) days written
notice, to Respondents’ U.S. facilities,
records, and employees to ensure ongoing compliance.
Paragraph VII. of the proposed Order
provides that the proposed Order will
expire in twenty (20) years.
By direction of the Commission,
Commissioner Wright recused.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–08692 Filed 4–11–13; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 3090–0297; Docket No.
2012–0001; Sequence 26]
Submission for OMB Review;
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; General Services
Administration Acquisition Regulation;
Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency
Service Delivery (GSA)
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery, in all
correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information, please
contact General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417; telephone (202)
501–4755.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of a request for
comments regarding an existing
information collection.
A. Purpose
As part of a Federal
Government wide effort to streamline
the process to seek feedback from the
public on service delivery, the General
Services Administration (GSA) will be
submitting a renewal to the Generic
Information Collection Request (Generic
ICR): ‘‘Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery’’ to OMB for
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA). A notice was
published in the Federal Register at 77
FR 74191, on December 13, 2012. Two
comments were received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
3090–0297, Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery, by any of the
following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘Information Collection
3090–0297’’, Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery. Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘Information Collection 3090–
0297’’, Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery. Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 3090–0297’’ on
your attached document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. Attn: Hada
Flowers/IC 3090–0297, Generic
Clearance.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
3090–0297, Generic Clearance for the
Title: Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery
Abstract: The information collection
activity will garner qualitative customer
and stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback we mean
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions,
but are not statistical surveys that yield
quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study.
This feedback will provide insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences and expectations, provide
an early warning of issues with service,
or focus attention on areas where
communication, training or changes in
operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the
Agency and its customers and
stakeholders. It will also allow feedback
to contribute directly to the
improvement of program management.
Feedback collected under this generic
clearance will provide useful
information, but it will not yield data
that can be generalized to the overall
population. This type of generic
clearance for qualitative information
will not be used for quantitative
information collections that are
designed to yield reliably actionable
results, such as monitoring trends over
time or documenting program
performance. Such data uses require
more rigorous designs that address: The
target population to which
generalizations will be made, the
sampling frame, the sample design
(including stratification and clustering),
the precision requirements or power
calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate,
methods for assessing potential non-
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 71 / Friday, April 12, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
response bias, the protocols for data
collection, and any testing procedures
that were or will be undertaken prior
fielding the study. Depending on the
degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be
eligible for submission for other generic
mechanisms that are designed to yield
quantitative results.
The Digital Government Strategy
released by the White House in May
2012 drives agencies to have a more
customer-centric focus. Because of this,
GSA anticipates an increase in requests
to use this generic clearance as the plan
states that: A customer-centric principle
charges us to do several things: Conduct
research to understand the customer’s
business, needs and desires; ‘‘make
content more broadly available and
accessible and present it through
multiple channels in a program- and
device-agnostic way; make content more
accurate and understandable by
maintaining plain language and content
freshness standards; and offer easy
paths for feedback to ensure we
continually improve service delivery.
The customer-centric principle holds
true whether our customers are internal
(e.g., the civilian and military federal
workforce in both classified and
unclassified environments) or external
(e.g., individual citizens, businesses,
research organizations, and state, local,
and tribal governments).’’
B. Discussion and Analysis
A notice was published in the Federal
Register at 77 FR 74191 on December
13, 2012. Two respondents submitted
public comments on the extension of
the previously approved information
collection. One comment was not in
scope of this collection. The analysis of
the public comments is summarized as
follows:
Comment: The respondent
commented that the extension of the
information collection would violate the
fundamental purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act because of the burden it
puts on the entity submitting the
information and the agency collecting
the information.
Response: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
agencies can request OMB approval of
an existing information collection. The
PRA requires that agencies use the
Federal Register notice and comment
process, to extend OMB’s approval, at
least every three years. This extension,
to a previously approved information
collection, pertains to a Paperwork
Reduction Act Generic Clearance (also
known as Fast Track Process). Generic
Clearance Information Collection
Requests (ICRs) provide a significantly
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Apr 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
streamlined process by which agencies
may obtain OMB’s approval for
particular information collections—
voluntary, low-burden, and
uncontroversial collections. Generic
ICRs are a useful way for agencies to
meet the obligations of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 while
eliminating unnecessary burdens and
delays. They can be used for a number
of information collections, including
methodological testing, customer
satisfaction surveys, focus groups,
contests, and Web site satisfaction
surveys. Therefore the extension of this
information collection actually serves
the purpose of reducing the burden on
the entity submitting the information
and the agency collecting the
information.
Comment: The respondent
commented that the agency did not
accurately estimate the public burden
an extension of the information
collection requirement would create,
and that the agency’s methodology for
calculating it is insufficient and does
not reflect the total burden. The
respondent indicated that the Agency’s
estimate of 145,534 respondents,
average burden estimate of 3.82
minutes, and the total burden hours
estimated by the Agency of 9,314 appear
understated.
Response: Serious consideration is
given, during the open comment period,
to all comments received and
adjustments are made to the paperwork
burden estimate based on
considerations provided by the public.
The burden is prepared taking into
consideration the necessary criteria in
OMB guidance for estimating the
paperwork burden put on the entity
submitting the information. Specific to
the approved use of a generic clearance,
the collections are low-burden for
respondents (based on considerations of
total burden hours, total number of
respondents, or burden-hours per
respondent) and are low-cost for both
the respondents and the Federal
Government. If this among other
conditions is not met, the Agency will
submit an information collection
request to OMB for approval through the
normal PRA process. Careful
consideration went into assessing the
estimated burden hours for this
collection, and it is determined that an
upward adjustment is not required at
this time.
Comment: The respondent
commented that the collective burden of
compliance with information collection
requirement greatly exceeds the
agency’s estimate and outweighs any
potential utility of the extension.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21953
Response: The Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) was designed to improve the
quality and use of Federal information
to strengthen decision-making,
accountability, and openness in
government and society. A key criteria
for using the Fast Track Process for data
collection is when participation by
respondents is voluntary, not
mandatory. The collective burden does
not outweigh the utility of the
extension.
Comment: The respondent
commented that the government’s
response to the Paperwork Reduction
Act Waiver of FAR case 2009 is
instructive on the total burden for
respondents.
Response: The details of that
particular FAR case are not specifically
relevant to this notice.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Below we provide GSA’s projected
average estimates for the next three
years:
Affected Public: Individuals and
households, businesses and
organizations, State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Average Expected Annual Number of
Activities: 48.
Respondents: 145,534.
Annual Responses: 48,511.
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average Minutes per Response: 3.82.
Burden hours: 9,314.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
control number.
Dated: April 5, 2013.
Casey Coleman,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–08656 Filed 4–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
[Document Identifier: HHS–OS–19201–60D]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection; Public
Comment Request
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In compliance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the
Secretary (OS), Department of Health
and Human Services, announces plans
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21952-21953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08656]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 3090-0297; Docket No. 2012-0001; Sequence 26]
Submission for OMB Review; Proposed Collection; Comment Request;
General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Generic
Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service
Delivery (GSA)
AGENCY: General Services Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of a request for comments regarding an existing
information collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of a Federal Government wide effort to streamline the
process to seek feedback from the public on service delivery, the
General Services Administration (GSA) will be submitting a renewal to
the Generic Information Collection Request (Generic ICR): ``Generic
Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service
Delivery'' to OMB for approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
A notice was published in the Federal Register at 77 FR 74191, on
December 13, 2012. Two comments were received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before May 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 3090-
0297, Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery, by any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for
``Information Collection 3090-0297'', Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery. Select
the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``Information
Collection 3090-0297'', Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery. Follow the
instructions provided at the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please
include your name, company name (if any), and ``Information Collection
3090-0297'' on your attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417. Attn:
Hada Flowers/IC 3090-0297, Generic Clearance.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information
Collection 3090-0297, Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery, in all correspondence
related to this collection. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information,
please contact General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417; telephone
(202) 501-4755.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Title: Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback
on Agency Service Delivery
Abstract: The information collection activity will garner
qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely
manner, in accordance with the Administration's commitment to improving
service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that
provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not
statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study. This feedback will provide
insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and
expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus
attention on areas where communication, training or changes in
operations might improve delivery of products or services. These
collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable
communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders.
It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement
of program management.
Feedback collected under this generic clearance will provide useful
information, but it will not yield data that can be generalized to the
overall population. This type of generic clearance for qualitative
information will not be used for quantitative information collections
that are designed to yield reliably actionable results, such as
monitoring trends over time or documenting program performance. Such
data uses require more rigorous designs that address: The target
population to which generalizations will be made, the sampling frame,
the sample design (including stratification and clustering), the
precision requirements or power calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate, methods for assessing
potential non-
[[Page 21953]]
response bias, the protocols for data collection, and any testing
procedures that were or will be undertaken prior fielding the study.
Depending on the degree of influence the results are likely to have,
such collections may still be eligible for submission for other generic
mechanisms that are designed to yield quantitative results.
The Digital Government Strategy released by the White House in May
2012 drives agencies to have a more customer-centric focus. Because of
this, GSA anticipates an increase in requests to use this generic
clearance as the plan states that: A customer-centric principle charges
us to do several things: Conduct research to understand the customer's
business, needs and desires; ``make content more broadly available and
accessible and present it through multiple channels in a program- and
device-agnostic way; make content more accurate and understandable by
maintaining plain language and content freshness standards; and offer
easy paths for feedback to ensure we continually improve service
delivery. The customer-centric principle holds true whether our
customers are internal (e.g., the civilian and military federal
workforce in both classified and unclassified environments) or external
(e.g., individual citizens, businesses, research organizations, and
state, local, and tribal governments).''
B. Discussion and Analysis
A notice was published in the Federal Register at 77 FR 74191 on
December 13, 2012. Two respondents submitted public comments on the
extension of the previously approved information collection. One
comment was not in scope of this collection. The analysis of the public
comments is summarized as follows:
Comment: The respondent commented that the extension of the
information collection would violate the fundamental purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act because of the burden it puts on the entity
submitting the information and the agency collecting the information.
Response: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
agencies can request OMB approval of an existing information
collection. The PRA requires that agencies use the Federal Register
notice and comment process, to extend OMB's approval, at least every
three years. This extension, to a previously approved information
collection, pertains to a Paperwork Reduction Act Generic Clearance
(also known as Fast Track Process). Generic Clearance Information
Collection Requests (ICRs) provide a significantly streamlined process
by which agencies may obtain OMB's approval for particular information
collections--voluntary, low-burden, and uncontroversial collections.
Generic ICRs are a useful way for agencies to meet the obligations of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 while eliminating unnecessary
burdens and delays. They can be used for a number of information
collections, including methodological testing, customer satisfaction
surveys, focus groups, contests, and Web site satisfaction surveys.
Therefore the extension of this information collection actually serves
the purpose of reducing the burden on the entity submitting the
information and the agency collecting the information.
Comment: The respondent commented that the agency did not
accurately estimate the public burden an extension of the information
collection requirement would create, and that the agency's methodology
for calculating it is insufficient and does not reflect the total
burden. The respondent indicated that the Agency's estimate of 145,534
respondents, average burden estimate of 3.82 minutes, and the total
burden hours estimated by the Agency of 9,314 appear understated.
Response: Serious consideration is given, during the open comment
period, to all comments received and adjustments are made to the
paperwork burden estimate based on considerations provided by the
public. The burden is prepared taking into consideration the necessary
criteria in OMB guidance for estimating the paperwork burden put on the
entity submitting the information. Specific to the approved use of a
generic clearance, the collections are low-burden for respondents
(based on considerations of total burden hours, total number of
respondents, or burden-hours per respondent) and are low-cost for both
the respondents and the Federal Government. If this among other
conditions is not met, the Agency will submit an information collection
request to OMB for approval through the normal PRA process. Careful
consideration went into assessing the estimated burden hours for this
collection, and it is determined that an upward adjustment is not
required at this time.
Comment: The respondent commented that the collective burden of
compliance with information collection requirement greatly exceeds the
agency's estimate and outweighs any potential utility of the extension.
Response: The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) was designed to improve
the quality and use of Federal information to strengthen decision-
making, accountability, and openness in government and society. A key
criteria for using the Fast Track Process for data collection is when
participation by respondents is voluntary, not mandatory. The
collective burden does not outweigh the utility of the extension.
Comment: The respondent commented that the government's response to
the Paperwork Reduction Act Waiver of FAR case 2009 is instructive on
the total burden for respondents.
Response: The details of that particular FAR case are not
specifically relevant to this notice.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Below we provide GSA's projected average estimates for the next
three years:
Affected Public: Individuals and households, businesses and
organizations, State, Local or Tribal Government.
Average Expected Annual Number of Activities: 48.
Respondents: 145,534.
Annual Responses: 48,511.
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average Minutes per Response: 3.82.
Burden hours: 9,314.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
Dated: April 5, 2013.
Casey Coleman,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-08656 Filed 4-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P