Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of Disapproval of Maine State Plan Amendments (SPA) 12-010, 21608-21610 [2013-08524]
Download as PDF
21608
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Notices
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
to improve users’ understanding of
levels of protection to be provided.
Product testing results will be
provided to the ASTM Committee on
Personal Protective Clothing and
Equipment—Biological Subcommittee
(a.k.a. ASTM Task Force), which will
utilize the data as the scientific basis to
develop a standard establishing
minimum performance criteria for
single-use and reusable isolation gowns.
The research objective is to evaluate
performance properties, such as strength
and barrier properties, of isolation
gowns to be provided to the ASTM Task
Force as scientific input for establishing
minimum performances for
conformance to this standard.
In this study, all testing will be
conducted blind. Results will be shared
with the ASTM Task Force only in a
blinded format. Results will be shared
with the individual manufacturers for
their gowns only. The final summary of
the testing will be shared in a blinded
format only with all manufacturers that
participated.
Randomized samples will be tested by
both NIOSH and Nelson Labs. The
ASTM Task Force will review and
analyze all test results. Establishment of
the minimum requirement for each
property will be the responsibility of the
ASTM Task Force. NIOSH plans to
conduct testing to measure the
following properties: Fabric weight,
breaking strength, tear strength, seam
strength, water resistance (impact
penetration and hydrostatic pressure),
microbial/viral penetration resistance,
air permeability, evaporative resistance,
and thermal insulation.
Neither this announcement, nor
product submittals in response to this
announcement, obligates NIOSH to
enter into a contractual agreement with
any respondent. Inquiries should be
sent to Selcen Kilinc at jcq8@cdc.gov.
NIOSH reserves the right to establish a
partnership based on scientific analysis
and capabilities found by way of this
announcement or other searches, if
determined to be in the best interest of
the government.
Dated: April 5, 2013.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–08461 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of
Disapproval of Maine State Plan
Amendments (SPA) 12–010
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of hearing.
AGENCY:
This notice announces an
administrative hearing to be held on
May 23, 2013, at the CMS Boston
Regional Office, JFK Federal Building,
15 N. Sudbury Street, Room 2050,
Boston, Massachusetts 02203–0003 to
reconsider CMS’ decision to disapprove
Maine SPA 12–010.
DATES: Closing Date: Requests to
participate in the hearing as a party
must be received by the presiding
officer by (15 days after publication).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin Cohen, Presiding Officer,
CMS, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite
L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Telephone: (410) 786–3169.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces an administrative
hearing to reconsider CMS’ decision to
disapprove Maine SPA 12–010 which
was submitted on August 1, 2012, and
disapproved on January 7, 2013. The
SPA proposed changes to eligibility for
parents, caretaker relatives, and
children whose income is at or below
133 percent of the federal poverty level
(FPL). The proposal would make
eligibility standards, methods, and
procedures more restrictive than those
in effect on March 23, 2010.
CMS disapproved this SPA after
consulting with the Secretary as
required by 42 CFR 430.15(c)(2) because
it appeared the proposal would have
eliminated Medicaid eligibility for
parents and caretaker relatives eligible
under sections 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and
1931 whose incomes are between 100
percent and 133 percent of the FPL, and
Medicaid eligibility of certain
individuals considered ‘‘children’’
under Maine’s state Medicaid plan. Both
proposals constituted more restrictive
eligibility standards than those in effect
in Maine as of March 23, 2010, that
could not be excepted from the
maintenance-of-effort (MOE) mandate
that Maine is subject to under section
1902(a)(74) and (gg) of the Social
Security Act (hereafter ‘‘the Act’’). At
issue in this appeal are the following
issues.
While states generally have authority
to modify Medicaid eligibility rules,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sections 1902(a)(74) and (gg) of the Act
require that states maintain eligibility
standards, methodologies, and
procedures that are no more restrictive
than those in effect under a state’s plan
as of the date of enactment of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(March 23, 2010). This MOE
requirement applies to adults until a
state’s health insurance exchange is
operational (January 1, 2014) and to
children until October 1, 2019.
Section 1902(gg)(3) of the Act offers a
partial non-application of the MOE
requirement during the period between
January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013,
when a state certifies to the Secretary
that it has a budget deficit during the
fiscal year for which it is seeking a nonapplication, or projects a budget deficit
during the succeeding fiscal year. This
provision limits the non-application to
‘‘nonpregnant, nondisabled adults who
are eligible for medical assistance under
the state plan or under a waiver of the
plan at the option of the state and whose
income exceeds 133 percent of the
poverty line.’’
Maine certified a projected budget
deficit for state fiscal year 2013 in
December 2011 and requested a nonapplication of the MOE requirement for
the period of July 1, 2012, through June
30, 2013. On February 10, 2012, CMS
notified Maine that it qualified for the
non-application for the requested
period.
Maine submitted SPA #12–010 on
August 1, 2012, which proposed
changes to its Medicaid eligibility rules
for parents, caretaker relatives, children,
and to Medicare savings programs
(MSPs). Specifically, Maine proposed:
Reducing the income eligibility limit
from 150 percent of the FPL to 100
percent for parents and caretaker
relatives who may qualify under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and 1931 of the Act;
lowering the age limit of eligibility from
20 to 18 for children who meet the
eligibility requirements for the aid to
families with dependent children
(AFDC) state plan but who would not
have received AFDC based on age; and
reducing income eligibility for the MSPs
through the elimination of certain
income disregards. Maine eventually
split the SPA into two, with the
proposal relating to families, caretaker
relatives, and children identified as SPA
#12–010, and the proposal relating to
MSPs identified as SPA #12–010A.
On January 7, 2013, CMS approved
SPA #12–010A, but disapproved SPA
#12–010. CMS determined that Maine’s
SPAs proposed eligibility rules more
restrictive than Maine’s rules in effect
on March 23, 2010. However, due to
Maine’s FY 2013 budget deficit
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Notices
certification, CMS determined that nonapplication of the MOE requirement
could apply to the changes to the MSP
eligibility rules in SPA #12–010A. (The
SPA will be effective only through June
30, 2013, unless the state certifies that
in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2013,
it again projects a budget deficit.) CMS
concluded that SPA #12–010A did not
reduce eligibility for any group of
individuals eligible for Medicaid on the
basis of a disability, pregnancy, or status
as a child. (On February 20, 2013, Louis
Bourgoin and others filed suit in the
United States District Court for the
District of Maine against the U.S.
Department of Health & Human Services
seeking to set aside the agency’s
approval of Maine SPA #12–010A.)
However, CMS determined that Maine
was not permitted an exception from the
MOE for the eligibility rule changes
proposed by SPA #12–010. The changes
proposed by SPA #12–010 applied to
individuals who are exempted from the
non-application provisions of the MOE
requirement, specifically, adults whose
incomes are below 133 percent of the
FPL and children.
Section 1116 of the Act and federal
regulations at 42 CFR part 430, establish
Department procedures that provide an
administrative hearing for
reconsideration of a disapproval of a
state plan or plan amendment. CMS is
required to publish a copy of the notice
to a State Medicaid agency that informs
the agency of the time and place of the
hearing, and the issues to be considered.
If we subsequently notify the agency of
additional issues that will be considered
at the hearing, we will also publish that
notice.
Any individual or group that wants to
participate in the hearing as a party
must petition the presiding officer
within 15 days after publication of this
notice, in accordance with the
requirements contained at 42 CFR
430.76(b)(2). Any interested person or
organization that wants to participate as
amicus curiae must petition the
presiding officer before the hearing
begins in accordance with the
requirements contained at 42 CFR
430.76(c). If the hearing is later
rescheduled, the presiding officer will
notify all participants.
The notice to Maine announcing an
administrative hearing to reconsider the
disapproval of its SPA reads as follows:
Mary C. Mayhew, Commissioner
Department of Health and Human
Services
Commissioner’s Office
221 State Street
11 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333–0011
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Dear Ms. Mayhew:
I am responding to your request for
reconsideration of the decision to
disapprove the Maine State Plan
Amendment (SPA) 12–010 which was
submitted on August 1, 2012, and
disapproved on January 7, 2013. The
SPA proposed changes to eligibility for
parents, caretaker relatives, and
children whose income is at or below
133 percent of the federal poverty level
(FPL). The proposal would make
eligibility standards, methods, and
procedures more restrictive than those
that were in effect on March 23, 2010.
I disapproved Maine SPA 12–010
because the proposal would have
eliminated Medicaid eligibility for
parents and caretaker relatives eligible
under sections 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and
1931 whose incomes are between 100
percent and 133 percent of the FPL, and
Medicaid eligibility of certain
individuals considered ‘‘children’’
under Maine’s state Medicaid plan. Both
proposals constituted more restrictive
eligibility standards than those in effect
in Maine as of March 23, 2010, that
could not be excepted from the
maintenance-of-effort (MOE) mandate
that Maine is subject to under section
1902(a)(74) and (gg) of the Social
Security Act (hereafter ‘‘the Act’’). At
issue in this appeal are the following
issues, which are more detailed than set
out in the disapproval letter:
While states generally have authority
to modify Medicaid eligibility rules,
sections 1902(a)(74) and (gg) of the Act
require that states maintain eligibility
standards, methodologies, and
procedures that are no more restrictive
than those in effect under a state’s plan
as of the date of enactment of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(March 23, 2010). This MOE
requirement applies to adults until a
state’s health insurance exchange is
operational (January 1, 2014) and to
children until October 1, 2019.
Section 1902(gg)(3) of the Act offers a
partial non-application of the MOE
requirement during the period between
January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013,
when a state certifies to the Secretary
that it has a budget deficit during the
fiscal year for which it is seeking a nonapplication, or projects a budget deficit
during the succeeding fiscal year. This
provision limits the non-application to
‘‘nonpregnant, nondisabled adults who
are eligible for medical assistance under
the state plan or under a waiver of the
plan at the option of the state and whose
income exceeds 133 percent of the
poverty line.’’
Maine certified a projected budget
deficit for state fiscal year 2013 in
December 2011 and requested a non-
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21609
application of the MOE requirement for
the period of July 1, 2012, through June
30, 2013. On February 10, 2012, the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) notified Maine that it
qualified for the non-application for the
requested period.
Maine submitted SPA #12–010 on
August 1, 2012, which proposed
changes to its Medicaid eligibility rules
for parents, caretaker relatives, children,
and to Medicare savings programs
(MSPs). Specifically, Maine proposed:
reducing the income eligibility limit
from 150 percent of the FPL to 100
percent for parents and caretaker
relatives who may qualify under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and 1931 of the Act;
lowering the age limit of eligibility from
20 to 18 for children who meet the
eligibility requirements for the aid to
families with dependent children
(AFDC) state plan but who would not
have received AFDC based on age; and
reducing income eligibility for the MSPs
through the elimination of certain
income disregards. Maine eventually
split the SPA into two, with the
proposal relating to families, caretaker
relatives and children identified as SPA
#12–010, and the proposal relating to
MSPs identified as SPA #12–010A.
On January 7, 2013, CMS approved
SPA #12–010A, but disapproved SPA
#12–010. CMS determined that Maine’s
SPAs proposed eligibility rules more
restrictive than Maine’s rules in effect
on March 23, 2010. However, due to
Maine’s FY 2013 budget deficit
certification, CMS determined that nonapplication of the MOE requirement
could apply to the changes to the MSP
eligibility rules in SPA #12–010A. (The
SPA will be effective only through June
30, 2013, unless the state certifies that
in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2013,
it again projects a budget deficit.) CMS
concluded that SPA #12–010A did not
reduce eligibility for any group of
individuals eligible for Medicaid on the
basis of a disability, pregnancy, or status
as a child. (On February 20, 2013, Louis
Bourgoin and others filed suit in the
United States District Court for the
District of Maine against the U.S.
Department of Health & Human Services
seeking to set aside the agency’s
approval of Maine SPA#12–010A.)
However, CMS determined that Maine
was not permitted an exception from the
MOE for the eligibility rule changes
proposed by SPA #12–010. The changes
proposed by SPA #12–010 applied to
individuals who are exempted from the
non-application provisions of the MOE
requirement, specifically, adults whose
incomes are below 133 percent of the
FPL and children.
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
21610
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Notices
In its letter of disapproval, CMS
responded to Maine’s claim that
National Federation of Independent
Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. ll, 132
S. Ct. 2566 (2012), directed approval of
the SPA. CMS pointed out that the
Supreme Court did not strike down any
provision of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, including the MOE
requirement, and that the MOE
requirement is unrelated to the
Medicaid eligibility expansion.
I am scheduling a hearing on your
request for reconsideration to be held on
May 23, 2013, at the CMS Boston
Regional Office, JFK Federal Building,
15 N. Sudbury Street, Room 2050,
Boston, Massachusetts 02203–0003 to
reconsider CMS’ decision to disapprove
Maine SPA #12–010.
If this date is not acceptable, I would
be glad to set another date that is
mutually agreeable to the parties. The
hearing will be governed by the
procedures prescribed by federal
regulations at 42 CFR Part 430.
I am designating Mr. Benjamin Cohen
as the presiding officer. If these
arrangements present any problems,
please contact Mr. Cohen at (410) 786–
3169. In order to facilitate any
communication that may be necessary
between the parties prior to the hearing,
please notify the presiding officer to
indicate acceptability of the hearing
date that has been scheduled and
provide names of the individuals who
will represent the state at the hearing.
Sincerely,
Marilyn Tavenner
Acting Administrator
Section 1116 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1316; 42 CFR 430.18)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
program No. 13.714, Medicaid Assistance
Program.)
Dated: April 4, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–08524 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Administration for Community Living
Expansion Funds for the Support of
the Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP)
Program
Notice of intent to provide
expansion and capacity building
funding to the incumbent Senior
Medicare Patrol (SMP) grantees under
limited competition.
ACTION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Administration for
Community Living is announcing the
availability of expansion funds for the
support of the Senior Medicare Patrol
(SMP) Program. This additional funding
opportunity will be used to expand the
reach of the SMP program with the
explicit purpose of expanding current
program capacity to recruit, train, and
support the SMP volunteer network. In
addition, this funding opportunity will
increase targeted collaborative efforts
with the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services, Office of Inspector
General and other law enforcement
entities in identified high fraud states.
Funding Opportunity Title/Program
Name: Health Care Fraud Prevention
Program Expansion and SMP Capacity
Building Grants.
Announcement Type: Health Care
Fraud Prevention Program Expansion
Capacity.
Funding Opportunity Number:
Program Announcement No. HHS–
2013–ACL–AoA–SP–0049
SUMMARY:
Statutory Authority: HIPAA of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–191).
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 93.048
Discretionary Projects
DATES: The deadline date for comments
on this program announcement is May
13, 2013. Other important dates:
• The application due date May 27,
2013.
• The anticipated start date is
September 30, 2013.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
During the past several years, the
Department of Health and Human
Services has increased efforts to fight
Medicare and Medicaid fraud. The
Administration for Community Living
(ACL), Administration on Aging (AoA),
through the SMP program, has worked
in partnership with the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
the Office of Inspector General (OIG),
and the Department of Justice to expand
strategies to eliminate waste, fraud, and
abuse in these Federal programs. This
additional funding opportunity will be
used to expand the reach of the SMP
program with the explicit purpose of
expanding efforts to target collaborative
efforts with CMS, OIG and other law
enforcement entities in high fraud states
and to expand current capacity to
recruit, train, and support the SMP
volunteer network.
Justification for the Exception to
Competition
It is necessary to limit competition for
this program to the current SMP
grantees to expand their implementation
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
efforts. In order for the outcomes
expected to be produced within the
allotted timeframe of the program, the
infrastructure for achieving these results
must already be in place. This
infrastructure includes:
• A proven SMP volunteer
management, training, and recruiting
program;
• Expertise in capturing data in the
SMP management, tracking, and
reporting system (SMART FACTS);
• Established partnership
relationships between the SMP program
and state and local fraud control
partners, including CMS, OIG, Attorney
General, and State Insurance
Commissioners offices;
• Developed and tested SMP program
public awareness materials, brochures,
PSAs, and other resources to use in
outreach and educational efforts;
• Expertise and experience in
reaching targeted populations with the
SMP message, among others.
The current SMP projects are
uniquely qualified to address the
requirements contained in this funding
opportunity. Their established
infrastructure and expertise will enable
them to successfully meet the
challenging and time-sensitive
requirements of this program. It is
essential that the infrastructure,
foundation of expertise, and proven
experience is in place to assure the grant
objectives are achieved.
II. Award Information
A. Purpose of the Program: Health
Care Fraud Prevention Program
Expansion.
B. Amount of the Awards: $20,000 to
$372,000 per budget period.
C. Project Period: September 30,
2013–September 29, 2015.
III. Eligible Applicants
Incumbent Senior Medicare Patrol
(SMP) grantees.
IV. Evaluation Criteria
A. Project Relevance & Current Need—
Weight: 5 points
B. Approach—Weight: 35 points
C. Budget—Weight: 10 points
D. Project Impact—Weight: 25 points
E. Organizational Capacity—Weight: 25
points
V. Application and Submission
Requirements
A. SF 424—Application for Federal
Assistance.
B. SF 424A—Budget Information.
C. Separate Budget Narrative/
Justification.
D. SF 424B—Assurances. Note: Be
sure to complete this form according to
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21608-21610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08524]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of Disapproval of Maine State
Plan Amendments (SPA) 12-010
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces an administrative hearing to be held on
May 23, 2013, at the CMS Boston Regional Office, JFK Federal Building,
15 N. Sudbury Street, Room 2050, Boston, Massachusetts 02203-0003 to
reconsider CMS' decision to disapprove Maine SPA 12-010.
DATES: Closing Date: Requests to participate in the hearing as a party
must be received by the presiding officer by (15 days after
publication).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin Cohen, Presiding Officer,
CMS, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Telephone: (410) 786-3169.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces an administrative
hearing to reconsider CMS' decision to disapprove Maine SPA 12-010
which was submitted on August 1, 2012, and disapproved on January 7,
2013. The SPA proposed changes to eligibility for parents, caretaker
relatives, and children whose income is at or below 133 percent of the
federal poverty level (FPL). The proposal would make eligibility
standards, methods, and procedures more restrictive than those in
effect on March 23, 2010.
CMS disapproved this SPA after consulting with the Secretary as
required by 42 CFR 430.15(c)(2) because it appeared the proposal would
have eliminated Medicaid eligibility for parents and caretaker
relatives eligible under sections 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and 1931 whose
incomes are between 100 percent and 133 percent of the FPL, and
Medicaid eligibility of certain individuals considered ``children''
under Maine's state Medicaid plan. Both proposals constituted more
restrictive eligibility standards than those in effect in Maine as of
March 23, 2010, that could not be excepted from the maintenance-of-
effort (MOE) mandate that Maine is subject to under section 1902(a)(74)
and (gg) of the Social Security Act (hereafter ``the Act''). At issue
in this appeal are the following issues.
While states generally have authority to modify Medicaid
eligibility rules, sections 1902(a)(74) and (gg) of the Act require
that states maintain eligibility standards, methodologies, and
procedures that are no more restrictive than those in effect under a
state's plan as of the date of enactment of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (March 23, 2010). This MOE requirement applies to
adults until a state's health insurance exchange is operational
(January 1, 2014) and to children until October 1, 2019.
Section 1902(gg)(3) of the Act offers a partial non-application of
the MOE requirement during the period between January 1, 2011, and
December 31, 2013, when a state certifies to the Secretary that it has
a budget deficit during the fiscal year for which it is seeking a non-
application, or projects a budget deficit during the succeeding fiscal
year. This provision limits the non-application to ``nonpregnant,
nondisabled adults who are eligible for medical assistance under the
state plan or under a waiver of the plan at the option of the state and
whose income exceeds 133 percent of the poverty line.''
Maine certified a projected budget deficit for state fiscal year
2013 in December 2011 and requested a non-application of the MOE
requirement for the period of July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. On
February 10, 2012, CMS notified Maine that it qualified for the non-
application for the requested period.
Maine submitted SPA 12-010 on August 1, 2012, which
proposed changes to its Medicaid eligibility rules for parents,
caretaker relatives, children, and to Medicare savings programs (MSPs).
Specifically, Maine proposed: Reducing the income eligibility limit
from 150 percent of the FPL to 100 percent for parents and caretaker
relatives who may qualify under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and 1931
of the Act; lowering the age limit of eligibility from 20 to 18 for
children who meet the eligibility requirements for the aid to families
with dependent children (AFDC) state plan but who would not have
received AFDC based on age; and reducing income eligibility for the
MSPs through the elimination of certain income disregards. Maine
eventually split the SPA into two, with the proposal relating to
families, caretaker relatives, and children identified as SPA
12-010, and the proposal relating to MSPs identified as SPA
12-010A.
On January 7, 2013, CMS approved SPA 12-010A, but
disapproved SPA 12-010. CMS determined that Maine's SPAs
proposed eligibility rules more restrictive than Maine's rules in
effect on March 23, 2010. However, due to Maine's FY 2013 budget
deficit
[[Page 21609]]
certification, CMS determined that non-application of the MOE
requirement could apply to the changes to the MSP eligibility rules in
SPA 12-010A. (The SPA will be effective only through June 30,
2013, unless the state certifies that in the fiscal year beginning July
1, 2013, it again projects a budget deficit.) CMS concluded that SPA
12-010A did not reduce eligibility for any group of
individuals eligible for Medicaid on the basis of a disability,
pregnancy, or status as a child. (On February 20, 2013, Louis Bourgoin
and others filed suit in the United States District Court for the
District of Maine against the U.S. Department of Health & Human
Services seeking to set aside the agency's approval of Maine SPA
12-010A.)
However, CMS determined that Maine was not permitted an exception
from the MOE for the eligibility rule changes proposed by SPA
12-010. The changes proposed by SPA 12-010 applied to
individuals who are exempted from the non-application provisions of the
MOE requirement, specifically, adults whose incomes are below 133
percent of the FPL and children.
Section 1116 of the Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR part 430,
establish Department procedures that provide an administrative hearing
for reconsideration of a disapproval of a state plan or plan amendment.
CMS is required to publish a copy of the notice to a State Medicaid
agency that informs the agency of the time and place of the hearing,
and the issues to be considered. If we subsequently notify the agency
of additional issues that will be considered at the hearing, we will
also publish that notice.
Any individual or group that wants to participate in the hearing as
a party must petition the presiding officer within 15 days after
publication of this notice, in accordance with the requirements
contained at 42 CFR 430.76(b)(2). Any interested person or organization
that wants to participate as amicus curiae must petition the presiding
officer before the hearing begins in accordance with the requirements
contained at 42 CFR 430.76(c). If the hearing is later rescheduled, the
presiding officer will notify all participants.
The notice to Maine announcing an administrative hearing to
reconsider the disapproval of its SPA reads as follows:
Mary C. Mayhew, Commissioner
Department of Health and Human Services
Commissioner's Office
221 State Street
11 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0011
Dear Ms. Mayhew:
I am responding to your request for reconsideration of the decision
to disapprove the Maine State Plan Amendment (SPA) 12-010 which was
submitted on August 1, 2012, and disapproved on January 7, 2013. The
SPA proposed changes to eligibility for parents, caretaker relatives,
and children whose income is at or below 133 percent of the federal
poverty level (FPL). The proposal would make eligibility standards,
methods, and procedures more restrictive than those that were in effect
on March 23, 2010.
I disapproved Maine SPA 12-010 because the proposal would have
eliminated Medicaid eligibility for parents and caretaker relatives
eligible under sections 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and 1931 whose incomes are
between 100 percent and 133 percent of the FPL, and Medicaid
eligibility of certain individuals considered ``children'' under
Maine's state Medicaid plan. Both proposals constituted more
restrictive eligibility standards than those in effect in Maine as of
March 23, 2010, that could not be excepted from the maintenance-of-
effort (MOE) mandate that Maine is subject to under section 1902(a)(74)
and (gg) of the Social Security Act (hereafter ``the Act''). At issue
in this appeal are the following issues, which are more detailed than
set out in the disapproval letter:
While states generally have authority to modify Medicaid
eligibility rules, sections 1902(a)(74) and (gg) of the Act require
that states maintain eligibility standards, methodologies, and
procedures that are no more restrictive than those in effect under a
state's plan as of the date of enactment of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (March 23, 2010). This MOE requirement applies to
adults until a state's health insurance exchange is operational
(January 1, 2014) and to children until October 1, 2019.
Section 1902(gg)(3) of the Act offers a partial non-application of
the MOE requirement during the period between January 1, 2011, and
December 31, 2013, when a state certifies to the Secretary that it has
a budget deficit during the fiscal year for which it is seeking a non-
application, or projects a budget deficit during the succeeding fiscal
year. This provision limits the non-application to ``nonpregnant,
nondisabled adults who are eligible for medical assistance under the
state plan or under a waiver of the plan at the option of the state and
whose income exceeds 133 percent of the poverty line.''
Maine certified a projected budget deficit for state fiscal year
2013 in December 2011 and requested a non-application of the MOE
requirement for the period of July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. On
February 10, 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
notified Maine that it qualified for the non-application for the
requested period.
Maine submitted SPA 12-010 on August 1, 2012, which
proposed changes to its Medicaid eligibility rules for parents,
caretaker relatives, children, and to Medicare savings programs (MSPs).
Specifically, Maine proposed: reducing the income eligibility limit
from 150 percent of the FPL to 100 percent for parents and caretaker
relatives who may qualify under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(I) and 1931
of the Act; lowering the age limit of eligibility from 20 to 18 for
children who meet the eligibility requirements for the aid to families
with dependent children (AFDC) state plan but who would not have
received AFDC based on age; and reducing income eligibility for the
MSPs through the elimination of certain income disregards. Maine
eventually split the SPA into two, with the proposal relating to
families, caretaker relatives and children identified as SPA
12-010, and the proposal relating to MSPs identified as SPA
12-010A.
On January 7, 2013, CMS approved SPA 12-010A, but
disapproved SPA 12-010. CMS determined that Maine's SPAs
proposed eligibility rules more restrictive than Maine's rules in
effect on March 23, 2010. However, due to Maine's FY 2013 budget
deficit certification, CMS determined that non-application of the MOE
requirement could apply to the changes to the MSP eligibility rules in
SPA 12-010A. (The SPA will be effective only through June 30,
2013, unless the state certifies that in the fiscal year beginning July
1, 2013, it again projects a budget deficit.) CMS concluded that SPA
12-010A did not reduce eligibility for any group of
individuals eligible for Medicaid on the basis of a disability,
pregnancy, or status as a child. (On February 20, 2013, Louis Bourgoin
and others filed suit in the United States District Court for the
District of Maine against the U.S. Department of Health & Human
Services seeking to set aside the agency's approval of Maine
SPA12-010A.)
However, CMS determined that Maine was not permitted an exception
from the MOE for the eligibility rule changes proposed by SPA
12-010. The changes proposed by SPA 12-010 applied to
individuals who are exempted from the non-application provisions of the
MOE requirement, specifically, adults whose incomes are below 133
percent of the FPL and children.
[[Page 21610]]
In its letter of disapproval, CMS responded to Maine's claim that
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. ----,
132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012), directed approval of the SPA. CMS pointed out
that the Supreme Court did not strike down any provision of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act, including the MOE requirement, and
that the MOE requirement is unrelated to the Medicaid eligibility
expansion.
I am scheduling a hearing on your request for reconsideration to be
held on May 23, 2013, at the CMS Boston Regional Office, JFK Federal
Building, 15 N. Sudbury Street, Room 2050, Boston, Massachusetts 02203-
0003 to reconsider CMS' decision to disapprove Maine SPA 12-
010.
If this date is not acceptable, I would be glad to set another date
that is mutually agreeable to the parties. The hearing will be governed
by the procedures prescribed by federal regulations at 42 CFR Part 430.
I am designating Mr. Benjamin Cohen as the presiding officer. If
these arrangements present any problems, please contact Mr. Cohen at
(410) 786-3169. In order to facilitate any communication that may be
necessary between the parties prior to the hearing, please notify the
presiding officer to indicate acceptability of the hearing date that
has been scheduled and provide names of the individuals who will
represent the state at the hearing.
Sincerely,
Marilyn Tavenner
Acting Administrator
Section 1116 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1316; 42 CFR
430.18)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program No. 13.714, Medicaid
Assistance Program.)
Dated: April 4, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-08524 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P