Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the St. Louis, MO; Southern Missouri; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas, 21515-21517 [2013-08518]
Download as PDF
21515
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 70
Thursday, April 11, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AM70
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition
of the St. Louis, MO; Southern
Missouri; Cleveland, OH; and
Pittsburgh, PA, Appropriated Fund
Federal Wage System Wage Areas
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management is issuing a final rule to
redefine the geographic boundaries of
the St. Louis, MO; Southern Missouri;
Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA,
appropriated fund Federal Wage System
(FWS) wage areas. The final rule
redefines Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, and
Perry Counties, MO, from the Southern
Missouri wage area to the St. Louis wage
area and Mercer County, PA, from the
Pittsburgh wage area to the Cleveland
wage area. These changes are based on
recent consensus recommendations of
the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee to best match the counties
proposed for redefinition to a nearby
FWS survey area. This final rule makes
two additional corrections. It renames
the Champaign-Urbana, IL, wage area as
the Central Illinois wage area and
updates the name of the White Sands
Proving Ground in the Albuquerque,
NM, and El Paso, TX, wage areas to
White Sands Missile Range.
DATES: This regulation is effective on
May 13, 2013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 15, 2012, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) issued a
proposed rule (77 FR 68073) to redefine
Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, and Perry
Counties, MO, from the Southern
Missouri wage area to the St. Louis wage
area and Mercer County, PA, from the
SUMMARY:
Pittsburgh wage area to the Cleveland
wage area. These changes are based on
recent consensus recommendations of
the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee to best match the above
counties to a nearby FWS survey area.
This final rule makes two additional
corrections. It renames the ChampaignUrbana, IL, wage area as the Central
Illinois wage area and updates the name
of the White Sands Proving Ground in
the Albuquerque, NM, and El Paso, TX,
wage areas to White Sands Missile
Range. These corrections do not affect
the pay of any FWS employees.
The proposed rule had a 30-day
comment period during which OPM
received no comments.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management amends 5 CFR
part 532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 532—
[Amended]
2. In appendix A to subpart B of part
532, under the State of Illinois, revise
‘‘Champaign-Urbana’’ wage area to read
‘‘Central Illinois’’.
■ 3. In appendix C to subpart B of part
532, under the State of Illinois, revise
‘‘Champaign-Urbana’’ wage area to read
‘‘Central Illinois’’, and revise the wage
area listings for the St. Louis, MO;
Southern Missouri; Albuquerque, NM;
Cleveland, OH; Pittsburgh, PA, and El
Paso, TX, wage areas to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—
Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MISSOURI
*
*
*
St. Louis
Survey Area
Illinois:
Clinton
Madison
Monroe
St. Clair
Missouri: (city)
St. Louis
Missouri: (counties)
Franklin
Jefferson
St. Charles
St. Louis
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Illinois:
Alexander
Bond
Calhoun
Clay
Effingham
Fayette
Franklin
Greene
Hamilton
Jackson
Jefferson
Jersey
Johnson
Macoupin
Marion
Massac
Montgomery
Morgan
Perry
Pike
Pope
Pulaski
Randolph
Saline
Scott
Union
Washington
Wayne
Williamson
Missouri:
Audrain
Bollinger
Boone
Callaway
Cape Girardeau
Clark
Cole
Crawford
Gasconade
Knox
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
21516
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Lewis
Lincoln
Marion
Moniteau
Monroe
Montgomery
Osage
Perry
Pike
Ralls
Randolph
St. Francois
Ste. Genevieve
Scotland
Shelby
Warren
Washington
Southern Missouri
Survey Area
Missouri:
Christian
Greene
Laclede
Phelps
Pulaski
Webster
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Kansas:
Cherokee
Crawford
Missouri:
Barry
Barton
Benton
Butler
Camden
Carter
Cedar
Dade
Dallas
Dent
Douglas
Hickory
Howell
Iron
Jasper
Lawrence
Madison
Maries
Miller
Mississippi
Morgan
New Madrid
Newton
Oregon
Ozark
Polk
Reynolds
Ripley
St. Clair
Scott
Shannon
Stoddard
Stone
Taney
Texas
Vernon
Wayne
Wright
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
*
*
NEW MEXICO
Albuquerque
Survey Area
New Mexico:
Bernalillo
Sandoval
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New Mexico:
Catron
Cibola
Colfax
Curry
De Baca
Guadalupe
Harding
Lincoln (Does not include White Sands
Missile Range portion)
Los Alamos
Mora
Quay
Rio Arriba
Roosevelt
San Miguel
Santa Fe
Socorro (Does not include White Sands
Missile Range portion)
Taos
Torrance
Union
Valencia
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
OHIO
*
*
*
Cleveland
Survey Area
Ohio:
Cuyahoga
Geauga
Lake
Medina
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Ohio:
Ashland
Ashtabula
Carroll
Columbiana
Erie
Huron
Lorain
Mahoning
Ottawa
Portage
Sandusky
Seneca
Stark
Summit
Trumbull
Wayne
Pennsylvania:
Mercer
*
*
*
*
PENNSYLVANIA
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
Pittsburgh
Survey Area
Ohio:Pennsylvania:
Allegheny
Beaver
Butler
Washington
Westmoreland
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Ohio:
Belmont
Harrison
Jefferson
Tuscarawas
Pennsylvania:
Armstrong
Bedford
Blair
Cambria
Cameron
Centre
Clarion
Clearfield
Clinton
Crawford
Elk (Does not include the Allegheny
National Forest portion)
Erie
Fayette
Forest (Does not include the Allegheny
National Forest portion)
Greene
Huntingdon
Indiana
Jefferson
Lawrence
Potter
Somerset
Venango
West Virginia:
Brooke
Hancock
Marshall
Ohio
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
TEXAS
*
*
*
El Paso
Survey Area
New Mexico:
Dona Ana
Otero
Texas:
El Paso
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New Mexico:
Chaves
Eddy
Grant
Hidalgo
Lincoln (Only White Sands Missile
Range portion)
Luna
Sierra
Socorro (Only White Sands Missile
Range portion)
Texas:
Culberson
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Hudspeth
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–08518 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION
BOARD
5 CFR Part 1201
Practices and Procedures
AGENCY:
Merit Systems Protection
Board.
ACTION:
Interim final rule.
The Merit Systems Protection
Board (MSPB or Board) hereby amends
its rules of practice and procedure to
allow federal agencies, when issuing a
decision notice to an employee on a
matter that is appealable to MSPB, to
satisfy the obligation to provide a copy
of the MSPB appeal form (MSPB Form
185) to an employee by providing the
employee with access to a copy of the
appeal form, i.e., in paper or electronic
form.
DATES: This interim final rule is
effective on April 11, 2013. Submit
written comments concerning this
interim final rule on or before May 13,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
concerning this interim final rule by one
of the following methods and in
accordance with the relevant
instructions:
Email: Comments submitted by email
should be addressed to mspb@mspb.gov
and can be contained in the body of the
email or as an attachment in any
common electronic format, including
word processing applications, HTML or
PDF. Commenters are asked to use a text
format and not an image format for
attachments. The email should contain
a subject line indicating that the
submission contains comments on
MSPB’s interim final rule. The MSPB
asks that parties use email to submit
comments if possible;
Fax: Comments submitted by fax
should be sent to (202) 653–7130. Faxes
should be addressed to William D.
Spencer and contain a subject line
indicating that the submission contains
comments concerning MSPB’s interim
final rule;
Mail or other commercial delivery:
Mailed submissions should be
addressed to William D. Spencer, Clerk
of the Board, Merit Systems Protection
Board, 1615 M Street NW., Washington,
DC 20419;
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Hand delivery or courier: Handdelivered submissions should be
addressed to William D. Spencer, Clerk
of the Board, Merit Systems Protection
Board, 1615 M Street NW., Washington,
DC 20419, and delivered to the 5th floor
reception window at this street address.
Such deliveries are only accepted
Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
Instructions: As noted above, MSPB
requests that commenters use email to
submit comments, if possible. All
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
will be made available online at the
Board’s Web site (https://
www.mspb.gov), including any personal
information provided, unless the
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by law. Those desiring to
submit anonymous comments must
submit comments in a manner that does
not reveal the commenter’s identity,
include a statement that the comment is
being submitted anonymously, and
include no personally-identifiable
information. The email address of a
commenter who chooses to submit
comments using email will not be
disclosed unless it appears in comments
attached to an email or in the body a
comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William D. Spencer, Clerk of the Board,
Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M
Street NW., Washington, DC, 20419;
phone: (202) 653–7200; fax: (202) 653–
7130; or email: mspb@mspb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
interim final rule amends 5 CFR
1201.21(c). Currently, this regulation
requires that, when a federal agency
issues a decision notice to an employee
on a matter that is appealable to MSPB,
the federal agency must provide the
employee with ‘‘[a] copy of the MSPB
appeal form * * *’’ The amendment set
forth herein will allow federal agencies
to provide employees ‘‘[a] copy, or
access to a copy, of the MSPB appeal
form * * * ’’ This amendment will
make paragraph (c) similar to paragraph
(b), which requires a federal agency to
provide the employee with ‘‘[a] copy, or
access to a copy, of the Board’s
regulations’’ under the same
circumstances.
The initial impetus to amend this
regulation arose when MSPB realized
that, under our current regulations,
federal agencies that furlough their
employees as a result of the
implementation of government-wide
‘‘sequestration’’ on March 1, 2013,
would be required to distribute
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21517
potentially hundreds of thousands of
copies of the 9-page MSPB appeal form
to employees along with the furlough
notifications. The existing MSPB
regulations were not drafted with such
a situation in mind. Moreover,
widespread access by federal employees
to the Internet, electronic mail, and
MSPB’s electronic filing system,
e-Appeal Online (https://eappeal.mspb.gov), ensure, in the vast
majority of cases, that the distribution of
thousands of paper copies of the MSPB
appeal form by federal agencies is
unnecessary.
This interim final rule is intended to
avoid the costly duplication of
hundreds of thousands of paper copies
of the MSPB appeal form and to allow
federal agencies to make better use of
electronic means of making documents
available to employees.
The Board is further convinced that
this minor amendment to its regulations
will not impose any hardship or
disadvantage upon employees who
receive a decision notice regarding a
matter that is appealable to MSPB. A
federal agency’s obligation under
1201.21(b) and (c) to provide access to
MSPB’s regulations and the MSPB
appeal form must be effective under the
circumstances. For example, if a federal
agency attempts to satisfy to 1201.21(b)
and (c) by providing an employee access
to MSPB’s regulations and appeal form
via the Internet or electronic mail and
the employee informs the agency that he
or she lacks Internet access, the agency
would be required to take other steps to
ensure that the employee has actual
access to these documents, including
providing the employee with a copy of
these documents upon the employee’s
request. Thus, the regulation, as
amended, continues to ensure that all
employees subject to a final decision
appealable to MSPB will have effective
access to the MSPB appeal form.
The rulemaking process must
normally observe notice-and-comment
procedures outlined in the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
However, an exemption from notice and
comment rulemaking requirements
exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) where
an ‘‘agency for good cause finds (and
incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the
rules issued) that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ The good cause exception ‘‘is
to be narrowly construed and only
reluctantly countenanced.’’ Mack
Trucks, Inc. v. Environmental Protection
Agency, 682 F.3d 87, 93 (D.C. Cir. 2012)
(citations omitted).
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21515-21517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08518]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 21515]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AM70
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the St. Louis, MO;
Southern Missouri; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, Appropriated Fund
Federal Wage System Wage Areas
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a final
rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of the St. Louis, MO;
Southern Missouri; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, appropriated fund
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. The final rule redefines
Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, and Perry Counties, MO, from the Southern
Missouri wage area to the St. Louis wage area and Mercer County, PA,
from the Pittsburgh wage area to the Cleveland wage area. These changes
are based on recent consensus recommendations of the Federal Prevailing
Rate Advisory Committee to best match the counties proposed for
redefinition to a nearby FWS survey area. This final rule makes two
additional corrections. It renames the Champaign-Urbana, IL, wage area
as the Central Illinois wage area and updates the name of the White
Sands Proving Ground in the Albuquerque, NM, and El Paso, TX, wage
areas to White Sands Missile Range.
DATES: This regulation is effective on May 13, 2013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 15, 2012, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) issued a proposed rule (77 FR 68073) to
redefine Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, and Perry Counties, MO, from the
Southern Missouri wage area to the St. Louis wage area and Mercer
County, PA, from the Pittsburgh wage area to the Cleveland wage area.
These changes are based on recent consensus recommendations of the
Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee to best match the above
counties to a nearby FWS survey area.
This final rule makes two additional corrections. It renames the
Champaign-Urbana, IL, wage area as the Central Illinois wage area and
updates the name of the White Sands Proving Ground in the Albuquerque,
NM, and El Paso, TX, wage areas to White Sands Missile Range. These
corrections do not affect the pay of any FWS employees.
The proposed rule had a 30-day comment period during which OPM
received no comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
will affect only Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management amends 5 CFR
part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 532--[Amended]
0
2. In appendix A to subpart B of part 532, under the State of Illinois,
revise ``Champaign-Urbana'' wage area to read ``Central Illinois''.
0
3. In appendix C to subpart B of part 532, under the State of Illinois,
revise ``Champaign-Urbana'' wage area to read ``Central Illinois'', and
revise the wage area listings for the St. Louis, MO; Southern Missouri;
Albuquerque, NM; Cleveland, OH; Pittsburgh, PA, and El Paso, TX, wage
areas to read as follows:
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
* * * * *
MISSOURI
* * * * *
St. Louis
Survey Area
Illinois:
Clinton
Madison
Monroe
St. Clair
Missouri: (city)
St. Louis
Missouri: (counties)
Franklin
Jefferson
St. Charles
St. Louis
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Illinois:
Alexander
Bond
Calhoun
Clay
Effingham
Fayette
Franklin
Greene
Hamilton
Jackson
Jefferson
Jersey
Johnson
Macoupin
Marion
Massac
Montgomery
Morgan
Perry
Pike
Pope
Pulaski
Randolph
Saline
Scott
Union
Washington
Wayne
Williamson
Missouri:
Audrain
Bollinger
Boone
Callaway
Cape Girardeau
Clark
Cole
Crawford
Gasconade
Knox
[[Page 21516]]
Lewis
Lincoln
Marion
Moniteau
Monroe
Montgomery
Osage
Perry
Pike
Ralls
Randolph
St. Francois
Ste. Genevieve
Scotland
Shelby
Warren
Washington
Southern Missouri
Survey Area
Missouri:
Christian
Greene
Laclede
Phelps
Pulaski
Webster
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Kansas:
Cherokee
Crawford
Missouri:
Barry
Barton
Benton
Butler
Camden
Carter
Cedar
Dade
Dallas
Dent
Douglas
Hickory
Howell
Iron
Jasper
Lawrence
Madison
Maries
Miller
Mississippi
Morgan
New Madrid
Newton
Oregon
Ozark
Polk
Reynolds
Ripley
St. Clair
Scott
Shannon
Stoddard
Stone
Taney
Texas
Vernon
Wayne
Wright
* * * * *
NEW MEXICO
Albuquerque
Survey Area
New Mexico:
Bernalillo
Sandoval
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New Mexico:
Catron
Cibola
Colfax
Curry
De Baca
Guadalupe
Harding
Lincoln (Does not include White Sands Missile Range portion)
Los Alamos
Mora
Quay
Rio Arriba
Roosevelt
San Miguel
Santa Fe
Socorro (Does not include White Sands Missile Range portion)
Taos
Torrance
Union
Valencia
* * * * *
OHIO
* * * * *
Cleveland
Survey Area
Ohio:
Cuyahoga
Geauga
Lake
Medina
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Ohio:
Ashland
Ashtabula
Carroll
Columbiana
Erie
Huron
Lorain
Mahoning
Ottawa
Portage
Sandusky
Seneca
Stark
Summit
Trumbull
Wayne
Pennsylvania:
Mercer
* * * * *
PENNSYLVANIA
* * * * *
Pittsburgh
Survey Area
Ohio:Pennsylvania:
Allegheny
Beaver
Butler
Washington
Westmoreland
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Ohio:
Belmont
Harrison
Jefferson
Tuscarawas
Pennsylvania:
Armstrong
Bedford
Blair
Cambria
Cameron
Centre
Clarion
Clearfield
Clinton
Crawford
Elk (Does not include the Allegheny National Forest portion)
Erie
Fayette
Forest (Does not include the Allegheny National Forest portion)
Greene
Huntingdon
Indiana
Jefferson
Lawrence
Potter
Somerset
Venango
West Virginia:
Brooke
Hancock
Marshall
Ohio
* * * * *
TEXAS
* * * * *
El Paso
Survey Area
New Mexico:
Dona Ana
Otero
Texas:
El Paso
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New Mexico:
Chaves
Eddy
Grant
Hidalgo
Lincoln (Only White Sands Missile Range portion)
Luna
Sierra
Socorro (Only White Sands Missile Range portion)
Texas:
Culberson
[[Page 21517]]
Hudspeth
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-08518 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P