Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Assessment Rate Decrease for Processed Pears, 21521-21522 [2013-08475]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
February 4, 2013. No comments were
received. Therefore, for reasons given in
the interim rule, we are adopting the
interim rule as a final rule, without
change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-12-00260001.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, and
the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (77 FR 72683, December 6,
2012) will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 923
Cherries, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 923—SWEET CHERRIES
GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES
IN WASHINGTON
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 923, which was
published at 77 FR 72683 on December
6, 2012, is adopted as a final rule,
without change.
Dated: April 5, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08463 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–12–0031; FV12–927–2
FIR]
Pears Grown in Oregon and
Washington; Assessment Rate
Decrease for Processed Pears
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Department of
Agriculture is adopting, as a final rule,
without change, an interim rule that
decreased the assessment rate
established for the Processed Pear
Committee (Committee) for the 2012–
2013 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$7.73 to $7.00 per ton of summer/fall
processed pears. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order that
regulates the handling of processed
pears grown in Oregon and Washington.
The Committee recommended the
assessment rate decrease because the
summer/fall processed pear promotion
budget for the 2012–2013 fiscal period
was reduced.
DATES: Effective April 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–
2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or Email:
Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide or
by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
927, as amended (7 CFR part 927),
regulating the handling of pears grown
in Oregon and Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Under the order, processed pear
handlers are subject to assessments,
which provide funds to administer the
order. Assessment rates issued under
the order are intended to be applicable
to all assessable processed pears for the
entire fiscal period, and continue
indefinitely until amended, suspended,
or terminated. The Committee’s fiscal
period begins on July 1, and ends on
June 30.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on December 5, 2012,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21521
and effective on December 6, 2012 (77
FR 72197, Doc. No. AMS–FV–12–0031,
FV12–927–2 IR), § 927.237 was
amended by decreasing the assessment
rate established for Oregon-Washington
processed pears for the 2012–2013 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $7.73 to
$7.00 per ton of summer/fall processed
pears handled. The Committee
recommended the assessment rate
decrease because the 2012–2013
summer/fall processed pear promotion
budget was reduced.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 1,500
producers of processed pears in the
regulated production area and
approximately 50 handlers of processed
pears subject to regulation under the
order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are
defined as those whose annual receipts
are less than $7,000,000. (13 CFR
121.201)
According to the Noncitrus Fruits and
Nuts 2011 Preliminary Summary issued
in March 2012 by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the total
farm-gate value of summer/fall
processed pears grown in Oregon and
Washington for 2011 was $35,315,000.
Based on the number of processed pear
producers in Oregon and Washington,
the average gross revenue for each
producer can be estimated at
approximately $23,543. Furthermore,
based on Committee records, the
Committee has estimated that each of
the Oregon-Washington pear handlers
currently ship less than $7,000,000
worth of processed pears all on an
annual basis. From this information, it
is concluded that the majority of
producers and handlers of Oregon and
Washington processed pears may be
classified as small entities.
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
21522
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
There are three pear processing plants
in the production area, all located in
Washington. All three pear processors
would be considered large entities
under the SBA’s definition of small
businesses.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2012–
2013 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$7.73 to $7.00 per ton of processed
pears handled. The Committee also
unanimously recommended 2012–2013
expenditures of $842,137. The
assessment rate of $7.00 is $0.73 lower
than the rate previously in effect.
The quantity of assessable summer/
fall processed pears for the 2012–2013
fiscal period is estimated at 120,000
tons. Thus, the $7.00 rate should
provide $840,000 in assessment income.
Income derived from summer/fall
processed pear handler assessments,
monetary reserve, interest, and other
income will be adequate to cover the
budgeted expenses. The Committee
recommended the assessment rate
decrease because the 2012–2013
summer/fall processed pear promotion
budget was reduced.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers and may reduce
the burden on producers.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Oregon-Washington pear industry. All
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the May
30, 2012, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Generic
Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are anticipated. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large OregonWashington processed pear handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
February 4, 2013. No comments were
received. Therefore, for the reasons
given in the interim rule, we are
adopting the interim rule as a final rule,
without change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=AMS-FV-12-0031
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, and
the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (77 FR 72197, December 5,
2012) will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 927—PEARS GROWN IN
OREGON AND WASHINGTON
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 927, which was
published at 77 FR 72197 on December
5, 2012, is adopted as a final rule,
without change.
Dated: April 5, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08475 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 140
RIN 3038–AE04
Delegation of Authority To Disclose
Confidential Information to a Contract
Market, Registered Futures
Association or Self-Regulatory
Organization
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission is revising
its regulations to add to its delegation of
authority to staff respecting the
disclosure of information to self-
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulatory organizations newly
established in the Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (the
‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’) and not previously
enumerated in the relevant regulations.
DATES: This rulemaking is effective on
April 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC
20581; David Van Wagner, Chief
Counsel, Division of Market Oversight,
telephone (202) 418–5481 and email
dvanwagner@cftc.gov; and Robert
Wasserman, Chief Counsel, Division of
Clearing and Risk, telephone (202) 418–
5092 and email rwasserman@cftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 8a(6) of the Commodity
Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’), 7 U.S.C. 12a(6),
authorizes the Commission to
communicate to the proper committee
of any registered entity the ‘‘full facts
concerning any transaction or market
operation, including the names of
parties thereto, which in the judgment
of the Commission disrupts or tends to
disrupt any market or is otherwise
harmful or against the best interests of
producers, consumers, or investors, or
which is necessary or appropriate to
effectuate the purposes of [the CEA].’’
The term ‘‘registered entity’’ has been
defined to include boards of trade
designated as contract markets,
derivatives clearing organizations, swap
execution facilities, swap data
repositories, and certain electronic
facilities on which a contract
determined by the Commission to be a
significant price discovery contract is
executed or traded.1
The definition of ‘‘registered entity’’
in the CEA was amended by the DoddFrank Act, which was enacted on July
21, 2010.2 Two new categories of
registered entity were established: Swap
execution facilities (‘‘SEFs’’) and swap
data repositories (‘‘SDRs’’), which have
self-regulatory roles in the swaps
markets established in the CEA and its
implementing regulations. Additionally,
the core principles for derivatives
clearing organizations (‘‘DCOs’’) were
revised to expand the scope of a DCO’s
self-regulatory responsibilities, in
particular with respect to risk
management. Commission regulations
implementing the core principles
require, for example, monitoring by the
DCO of the large trader reports of its
17
U.S.C. 1a(40).
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111–203, 124
Stat. 1376 (2010).
2 See
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21521-21522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-12-0031; FV12-927-2 FIR]
Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Assessment Rate Decrease
for Processed Pears
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture is adopting, as a final rule,
without change, an interim rule that decreased the assessment rate
established for the Processed Pear Committee (Committee) for the 2012-
2013 and subsequent fiscal periods from $7.73 to $7.00 per ton of
summer/fall processed pears. The Committee locally administers the
marketing order that regulates the handling of processed pears grown in
Oregon and Washington. The Committee recommended the assessment rate
decrease because the summer/fall processed pear promotion budget for
the 2012-2013 fiscal period was reduced.
DATES: Effective April 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-
2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email: Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide or
by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax:
(202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 927, as amended (7 CFR part 927), regulating the handling of pears
grown in Oregon and Washington, hereinafter referred to as the
``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
Under the order, processed pear handlers are subject to
assessments, which provide funds to administer the order. Assessment
rates issued under the order are intended to be applicable to all
assessable processed pears for the entire fiscal period, and continue
indefinitely until amended, suspended, or terminated. The Committee's
fiscal period begins on July 1, and ends on June 30.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on December 5,
2012, and effective on December 6, 2012 (77 FR 72197, Doc. No. AMS-FV-
12-0031, FV12-927-2 IR), Sec. 927.237 was amended by decreasing the
assessment rate established for Oregon-Washington processed pears for
the 2012-2013 and subsequent fiscal periods from $7.73 to $7.00 per ton
of summer/fall processed pears handled. The Committee recommended the
assessment rate decrease because the 2012-2013 summer/fall processed
pear promotion budget was reduced.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 1,500 producers of processed pears in the
regulated production area and approximately 50 handlers of processed
pears subject to regulation under the order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as
those having annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts
are less than $7,000,000. (13 CFR 121.201)
According to the Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2011 Preliminary Summary
issued in March 2012 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service,
the total farm-gate value of summer/fall processed pears grown in
Oregon and Washington for 2011 was $35,315,000. Based on the number of
processed pear producers in Oregon and Washington, the average gross
revenue for each producer can be estimated at approximately $23,543.
Furthermore, based on Committee records, the Committee has estimated
that each of the Oregon-Washington pear handlers currently ship less
than $7,000,000 worth of processed pears all on an annual basis. From
this information, it is concluded that the majority of producers and
handlers of Oregon and Washington processed pears may be classified as
small entities.
[[Page 21522]]
There are three pear processing plants in the production area, all
located in Washington. All three pear processors would be considered
large entities under the SBA's definition of small businesses.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee and collected from
handlers for the 2012-2013 and subsequent fiscal periods from $7.73 to
$7.00 per ton of processed pears handled. The Committee also
unanimously recommended 2012-2013 expenditures of $842,137. The
assessment rate of $7.00 is $0.73 lower than the rate previously in
effect.
The quantity of assessable summer/fall processed pears for the
2012-2013 fiscal period is estimated at 120,000 tons. Thus, the $7.00
rate should provide $840,000 in assessment income. Income derived from
summer/fall processed pear handler assessments, monetary reserve,
interest, and other income will be adequate to cover the budgeted
expenses. The Committee recommended the assessment rate decrease
because the 2012-2013 summer/fall processed pear promotion budget was
reduced.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers and some of the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden
on handlers and may reduce the burden on producers.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the Oregon-Washington pear industry. All interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the May 30,
2012, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Generic Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action are anticipated. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Oregon-Washington processed pear
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before February 4, 2013. No comments were received. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule as
a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=AMS-FV-12-0031
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 72197, December 5, 2012) will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 927--PEARS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 7 CFR part 927, which was
published at 77 FR 72197 on December 5, 2012, is adopted as a final
rule, without change.
Dated: April 5, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-08475 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P