Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 21571-21573 [2013-08451]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(j) Post-Replacement Inspection Compliance
Time
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 28,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 727, 727C, 727–100, 727–
100C, 727–200, and 727–200F series
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 55, Stabilizers.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks
on the elevator rear spar stiffener assembly.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracking of the elevator rear spar stiffener
assembly, which could adversely affect
elevator structural stiffness, that could lead
to elevator vibration and possible
interference with the tab control rod and
which could result in elevator flutter and
consequent loss of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Repetitive Inspections and Corrective
Actions
Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this
AD, at the applicable time specified in table
1 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 727–55–
0094, dated March 21, 2012, do a detailed
inspection for any cracking of the elevator
rear spar stiffener assembly, and all
applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
727–55–0094, dated March 21, 2012. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further
flight. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable time specified in table 1 of
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 727–55–
0094, dated March 21, 2012, except as
provided by paragraph (j) of this AD.
(h) Exception
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Where Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 727–55–0094, dated March 21, 2012,
specifies a compliance time ‘‘from the
original issue date of this service bulletin,’’
this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
(i) Optional Replacement
Replacing the elevator rear spar stiffener
assembly with a new assembly in accordance
with Part 4 or 5, as applicable, of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 727–55–
0094, dated March 21, 2012, terminates the
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD for that assembly, except as required by
paragraph (j) of this AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
21571
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
For any elevator rear spar stiffener
assembly replaced as required by paragraph
(g) of the AD or as specified in paragraph (i)
of this AD: Do the next inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD for that assembly
within 96 months after accomplishing the
replacement and repeat thereafter at the
times specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
Federal Aviation Administration
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
phone: 425–917–6577; fax: 425–917–6590;
email: berhane.alazar@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
28, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08454 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0304; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–005–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747–400,
–400D, and –400F series airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report
of water leakage into the main deck
cargo wire integration unit (WIU). The
water flowed from the drip shield
through disbonded floor seams into the
aft main equipment center (MEC) drip
shield gutter, then onto the WIU. This
proposed AD would require removing
the cargo liner support; cleaning the aft
MEC drip shield gutter; and doing a
one-time general visual inspection for
disbonded seams, and repair if
necessary. This proposed AD would
also require installing a fiberglass
reinforcement overcoat to the top
surface of the aft MEC drip shield
gutters and installing the cargo liner
support. We are proposing this AD to
prevent water penetration into the MEC,
which could result in the loss of flight
critical systems.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21572
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Francis Smith, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6596; fax (425) 917–6590;
email francis.smith@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2013–0304; Directorate Identifier 2013–
NM–005–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received a report indicating that
water leakage into the main deck cargo
WIU was found. The water flowed from
the drip shield through disbonded floor
seams into the aft MEC drip shield
gutter, then onto the WIU. Liquids can
leak through the MEC drip shield due to
disbonded aft MEC drip shield gutters,
resulting in water intrusion into the
WIU of the MEC. Disbonding can occur
due to improper preparation of the drip
shield/gutter material and aging of
materials. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in water
penetration into the MEC, and loss of
flight critical systems.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–25A3613, dated June 22,
2012. For information on the procedures
and compliance times, see this service
information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA–2013–0304.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously.
The phrase ‘‘related investigative
actions’’ might be used in this proposed
AD. ‘‘Related investigative actions’’ are
follow-on actions that: (1) are related to
the primary actions, and (2) further
investigate the nature of any condition
found. Related investigative actions in
an AD could include, for example,
inspections.
In addition, the phrase ‘‘corrective
actions’’ might be used in this proposed
AD. ‘‘Corrective actions’’ are actions
that correct or address any condition
found. Corrective actions in an AD
could include, for example, repairs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 79 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost per
product
Labor cost
Remove cargo liner support, clean gutter, inspection.
Install fiberglass reinforcement and cargo
liner support.
6 work-hours × $85 per hour = $510 .............
$0
$510
$40,290
6 work-hours × $85 per hour = $510 .............
100
610
48,190
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Parts cost
Cost on U.S.
operators
Action
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD): Docket No. FAA–2013–
0304; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–
005–AD.
■
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May
28, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 747–400, –400D, and
–400F series airplanes, certificated in
any category, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–25A3613,
dated June 22, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component
(JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA)
of America Code 25: Equipment/
Furnishings.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report
indicating that water leakage into the
main deck cargo wire integration unit
(WIU) was found. The water flowed
from the drip shield through disbonded
floor seams into the aft main equipment
center (MEC) drip shield gutter, then
onto the WIU. We are issuing this AD
to prevent water penetration into the
MEC, which could result in the loss of
flight critical systems.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless
already done.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD: Do the actions specified
in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this
AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–25A3613,
dated June 22, 2012.
(1) Remove the cargo liner support,
clean the aft MEC drip shield gutter, and
do a general visual inspection for
disbonded seams; repair before further
flight if any seam disbonding is found.
(2) Install a fiberglass reinforcement
overcoat to the top surface of the aft
MEC drip shield gutters, and install a
cargo liner support.
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
29, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08451 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 39.13
(g) Removal/Cleaning/Inspection/Repair
if Necessary/Installations
21573
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to
your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate
holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an
acceptable level of safety may be used
for any repair required by this AD if it
is approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the
airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Federal Aviation Administration
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this
AD, contact Francis Smith, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and
Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–
150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6596; fax (425) 917–6590;
email francis.smith@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified
in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0298; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–175–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC–8–102,
–103, –106, –201, –202, –301, –311, and
–315 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of dual alternating
current (AC) generator failure during
flight. The failure was attributed to wire
chafing along the wing lower flap
shroud. This proposed AD would
require revising the maintenance
program to incorporate certain tasks for
the electrical wiring interconnection
system inspection program. We are
proposing this AD to prevent failure of
both AC generators due to wire chafing,
which could result in loss of power to
the anti-icing heaters for the elevator
horn, engine inlet, and propeller, and
consequent ice accumulation in these
areas, which could adversely affect the
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21571-21573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08451]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0304; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-005-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 747-400, -400D, and -400F series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of water leakage
into the main deck cargo wire integration unit (WIU). The water flowed
from the drip shield through disbonded floor seams into the aft main
equipment center (MEC) drip shield gutter, then onto the WIU. This
proposed AD would require removing the cargo liner support; cleaning
the aft MEC drip shield gutter; and doing a one-time general visual
inspection for disbonded seams, and repair if necessary. This proposed
AD would also require installing a fiberglass reinforcement overcoat to
the top surface of the aft MEC drip shield gutters and installing the
cargo liner support. We are proposing this AD to prevent water
penetration into the MEC, which could result in the loss of flight
critical systems.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet
[[Page 21572]]
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francis Smith, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6596; fax (425) 917-6590; email
francis.smith@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0304;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-005-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received a report indicating that water leakage into the main
deck cargo WIU was found. The water flowed from the drip shield through
disbonded floor seams into the aft MEC drip shield gutter, then onto
the WIU. Liquids can leak through the MEC drip shield due to disbonded
aft MEC drip shield gutters, resulting in water intrusion into the WIU
of the MEC. Disbonding can occur due to improper preparation of the
drip shield/gutter material and aging of materials. This condition, if
not corrected, could result in water penetration into the MEC, and loss
of flight critical systems.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-25A3613, dated June
22, 2012. For information on the procedures and compliance times, see
this service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA-2013-0304.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.
The phrase ``related investigative actions'' might be used in this
proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions
that: (1) are related to the primary actions, and (2) further
investigate the nature of any condition found. Related investigative
actions in an AD could include, for example, inspections.
In addition, the phrase ``corrective actions'' might be used in
this proposed AD. ``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or
address any condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include,
for example, repairs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 79 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remove cargo liner support, clean 6 work-hours x $85 per $0 $510 $40,290
gutter, inspection. hour = $510.
Install fiberglass reinforcement and 6 work-hours x $85 per 100 610 48,190
cargo liner support. hour = $510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
[[Page 21573]]
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD): Docket No. FAA-2013-0304; Directorate Identifier 2013-
NM-005-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 28, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400, -400D, and -
400F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-25A3613, dated June 22, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 25: Equipment/Furnishings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report indicating that water leakage into
the main deck cargo wire integration unit (WIU) was found. The water
flowed from the drip shield through disbonded floor seams into the aft
main equipment center (MEC) drip shield gutter, then onto the WIU. We
are issuing this AD to prevent water penetration into the MEC, which
could result in the loss of flight critical systems.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless
already done.
(g) Removal/Cleaning/Inspection/Repair if Necessary/Installations
Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD: Do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-25A3613, dated June 22, 2012.
(1) Remove the cargo liner support, clean the aft MEC drip shield
gutter, and do a general visual inspection for disbonded seams; repair
before further flight if any seam disbonding is found.
(2) Install a fiberglass reinforcement overcoat to the top surface
of the aft MEC drip shield gutters, and install a cargo liner support.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information section
of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used
for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that
has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make those findings.
For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane and the approval must specifically
refer to this AD.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Francis Smith,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-
150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6596; fax (425) 917-
6590; email francis.smith@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 29, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-08451 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P