Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 21576-21578 [2013-08450]
Download as PDF
21576
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 100
Maintenance Task Card 531X1, in Section 8,
Electrical Wiring Interconnection System
Inspection Program, of Part 1, Maintenance
Review Board Report, of the Bombardier
DHC–8 Maintenance Program Manual PSM
1–8–7, Revision 25, dated February 20, 2012.
(ii) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 100
Maintenance Task Card 631X1, in Section 8,
Electrical Wiring Interconnection System
Inspection Program, of Part 1, Maintenance
Review Board Report, of the Bombardier
DHC–8 Maintenance Program Manual PSM
1–8–7, Revision 25, dated February 20, 2012.
(iii) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 200
Maintenance Task Card 531X1, in Section 8,
Electrical Wiring Interconnection System
Inspection Program, of Part 1, Maintenance
Review Board Report, of the Bombardier
DHC–8 Maintenance Program Manual PSM
1–82–7, Revision 16, dated February 20,
2012.
(iv) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 200
Maintenance Task Card 631X1, in Section 8,
Electrical Wiring Interconnection System
Inspection Program, of Part 1, Maintenance
Review Board Report, of the Bombardier
DHC–8 Maintenance Program Manual PSM
1–82–7, Revision 16, dated February 20,
2012.
(v) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 300
Maintenance Task Card 531X1, in Section 8,
Electrical Wiring Interconnection System
Inspection Program, of Part 1, Maintenance
Review Board Report, of the Bombardier
DHC–8 Maintenance Program Manual PSM 1
83–7, Revision 25, dated February 20, 2012.
(vi) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 300
Maintenance Task Card 631X1, in Section 8,
Electrical Wiring Interconnection System
Inspection Program, of Part 1, Maintenance
Review Board Report, of the Bombardier
DHC–8 Maintenance Program Manual, PSM
1–83–7, Revision 25, dated February 20,
2012.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series
Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada;
telephone 416–375–4000; fax 416–375–4539;
email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
28, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08453 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0300; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–163–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 757–200,
757–200CB, and 757–200PF airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by a
report that a forward-most cam latch of
the forward center cam latch pair on a
main cargo door (MCD) broke during
flight. This proposed AD would require
performing repetitive inspections of the
MCD cam latches; replacing cam
latches, certain bolts, and door hinge
fittings; performing related investigative
and corrective actions, if necessary; and
MCD rigging. We are proposing this AD
to detect and correct cracked or
damaged cam latches, latch pins, and
latch pin cross bolts, which could
reduce the structural integrity of the
MCD, and result in potential rapid
decompression of the airplane and
potential loss of the cargo door from the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly DeVoe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: (425) 917–6495;
fax: (425) 917–6590; email:
kimberly.devoe@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2013–0300; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–163–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received a report that the forwardmost cam latch on the forward center
cam latch pair on a main cargo door
(MCD) broke during flight on a Model
757 airplane. Cracked or damaged cam
latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross
bolts, if not corrected, could reduce the
structural integrity of the MCD, and
result in potential rapid decompression
of the airplane and potential loss of the
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
cargo door from the airplane. Two of the
eight cam latches or latch pins being
broken in close proximity will cause
loss of the cargo door during flight.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated March 9,
2010. For information on the procedures
and compliance times, see this service
information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA–2013–0300.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of these same
type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information identified
previously under ‘‘Relevant Service
Information,’’ except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Information.’’
The phrase ‘‘related investigative
actions’’ might be used in this proposed
AD. ‘‘Related investigative actions’’ are
follow-on actions that (1) are related to
the primary actions, and (2) are actions
that further investigate the nature of any
condition found. Related investigative
actions in an AD could include, for
example, inspections.
In addition, the phrase ‘‘corrective
actions’’ might be used in this proposed
AD. ‘‘Corrective actions’’ are actions
21577
that correct or address any condition
found. Corrective actions in an AD
could include, for example, repairs.
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Information
The Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–
52A0091, dated March 9, 2010, specify
to contact the manufacturer for
disposition of certain repair conditions,
this proposed AD would require
operators to repair those conditions
using a method approved by the FAA.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 9 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Inspections/Modification ..........
Replace cross bolts .................
55 work-hours × $85 per hour = $4,675 .................................
3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ......................................
None ............
$0 .................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
16:45 Apr 10, 2013
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Regulatory Findings
VerDate Mar<15>2010
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Jkt 229001
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2013–0300; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–163–AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per
product
$4,675
255
Cost on U.S.
operators
$42,075
2,295
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 28,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 757–200, 757–200CB, and 757–200PF
airplanes; certified in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 52, Doors.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that a
forward most cam latch on the forward center
cam latch pair on a main cargo door (MCD)
broke during flight. We are issuing to detect
and correct cracked or damaged cam latches,
latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts, which
could reduce the structural integrity of the
MCD, and result in potential rapid
decompression of the airplane and potential
loss of the cargo door from the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) MCD Inspections, Bolt Torque, Latch Pin
Measurement, Bolt Replacement, and
Rigging
At the applicable times specified in table
1 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated
March 9, 2010, except as specified in
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21578
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed
inspection of the cam latches and latch pins
to detect damage, distress, and incorrect
rigging; torque the cross bolts; measure the
extension of the latch pins; replace all alloy
steel bolts used as latch pin cross bolts with
corrosion resistant steel (CRES) bolts; rig the
MCD, as applicable; and do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–52A0091, dated March 9, 2010, except
as required by paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Do
all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions at the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–52A0091,
dated March 9, 2010.
(h) Repetitive Inspections
Repeat the applicable inspections specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD, as specified in
paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of this
AD, at the applicable times specified in table
1 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated
March 9, 2010. The inspection conditions are
defined in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–
52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(1) For airplanes found with Inspection
Condition 5: Repeat the general visual
inspection for broken, cracked, missing, or
migrated parts of the cam latches and latch
pins.
(2) For airplanes found with Inspection
Condition 2, 4.2, or 5: Repeat the detailed
inspection for damage, distress, and incorrect
rigging of the cam latches and latch pins.
(3) For airplanes found with Inspection
Condition 5: Repeat the high frequency eddy
current or magnetic particle inspection to
detect signs of cracking of cam latches 1 and
2.
damage, distress, and incorrect rigging of the
cam latches and latch pins specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD on remaining cam
latches and cam pins at the applicable times
specified in table 2 of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(k) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an alloy steel bolt as a
cross bolt through any latch pin fitting
assembly in the lower sill of the MCD on any
airplane.
(l) Exceptions to Service Bulletin
Specifications
The following exceptions apply in this AD.
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–52A0091, dated March 9, 2010, specifies
a compliance time after the date of that
service bulletin, this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–52A0091, dated March 9, 2010, specifies
to contact Boeing for appropriate action:
Before further flight, repair the discrepancy
in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, Seattle, Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) MCD Post-Rigging Initial Inspections and
Related Investigative and Corrective Actions
At the applicable times specified in table
2 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated
March 9, 2010: Do a general visual inspection
of the cam latches and latch pins for
discrepancies; a detailed inspection of the
cam latches and latch pins for discrepancies;
and an HFEC or magnetic particle inspection
of cam latch 1 and cam latch 2 for cracking;
and do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions, except as required by
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–52A0091,
dated March 9, 2010. Do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions at
the applicable time specified in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
to make those findings. For a repair method
to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(j) MCD Post-Rigging Repetitive Inspections
(1) For all airplanes: Repeat the inspections
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD, at the
applicable times specified in table 2 of
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated
March 9, 2010.
(2) For airplanes found with Inspection
Condition 2 as defined in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–52A0091, dated March
9, 2010: Repeat the detailed inspection for
(n) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Kimberly DeVoe, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
phone: (425) 917–6495 ; fax: (425) 917–6590;
email: kimberly.devoe@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
28, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–08450 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0195; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NE–08–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
General Electric Company (GE) model
GEnx-2B67 and GEnx-2B67B turbofan
engines with booster anti-ice (BAI) air
duct, part number (P/N) 2469M32G01,
and support bracket, P/N 2469M46G01,
installed. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of cracks in the
BAI air duct. This proposed AD would
require initial and repetitive visual
inspections of the BAI air duct, removal
from service of the BAI air duct if it fails
inspection and, as a mandatory
terminating action, the installation of
new BAI air duct support brackets. We
are proposing this AD to prevent failure
of the BAI air duct, resulting in an inflight shutdown of one or more engines,
loss of thrust control, and damage to the
aircraft.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21576-21578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08450]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0300; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-163-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-200PF
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report that a forward-
most cam latch of the forward center cam latch pair on a main cargo
door (MCD) broke during flight. This proposed AD would require
performing repetitive inspections of the MCD cam latches; replacing cam
latches, certain bolts, and door hinge fittings; performing related
investigative and corrective actions, if necessary; and MCD rigging. We
are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracked or damaged cam
latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts, which could reduce the
structural integrity of the MCD, and result in potential rapid
decompression of the airplane and potential loss of the cargo door from
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly DeVoe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: (425) 917-6495; fax: (425) 917-6590; email:
kimberly.devoe@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0300;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-163-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received a report that the forward-most cam latch on the forward
center cam latch pair on a main cargo door (MCD) broke during flight on
a Model 757 airplane. Cracked or damaged cam latches, latch pins, and
latch pin cross bolts, if not corrected, could reduce the structural
integrity of the MCD, and result in potential rapid decompression of
the airplane and potential loss of the
[[Page 21577]]
cargo door from the airplane. Two of the eight cam latches or latch
pins being broken in close proximity will cause loss of the cargo door
during flight.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March
9, 2010. For information on the procedures and compliance times, see
this service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA-2013-0300.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information identified previously under ``Relevant
Service Information,'' except as discussed under ``Differences Between
the Proposed AD and the Service Information.''
The phrase ``related investigative actions'' might be used in this
proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions
that (1) are related to the primary actions, and (2) are actions that
further investigate the nature of any condition found. Related
investigative actions in an AD could include, for example, inspections.
In addition, the phrase ``corrective actions'' might be used in
this proposed AD. ``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or
address any condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include,
for example, repairs.
Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information
The Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010, specify to contact the manufacturer
for disposition of certain repair conditions, this proposed AD would
require operators to repair those conditions using a method approved by
the FAA.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 9 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections/Modification........ 55 work-hours x $85 per None................ $4,675 $42,075
hour = $4,675.
Replace cross bolts............. 3 work-hours x $85 per $0.................. 255 2,295
hour = $255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2013-0300; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-163-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 28, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 757-200, 757-200CB,
and 757-200PF airplanes; certified in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that a forward most cam latch
on the forward center cam latch pair on a main cargo door (MCD)
broke during flight. We are issuing to detect and correct cracked or
damaged cam latches, latch pins, and latch pin cross bolts, which
could reduce the structural integrity of the MCD, and result in
potential rapid decompression of the airplane and potential loss of
the cargo door from the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) MCD Inspections, Bolt Torque, Latch Pin Measurement, Bolt
Replacement, and Rigging
At the applicable times specified in table 1 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated
March 9, 2010, except as specified in
[[Page 21578]]
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of the cam
latches and latch pins to detect damage, distress, and incorrect
rigging; torque the cross bolts; measure the extension of the latch
pins; replace all alloy steel bolts used as latch pin cross bolts
with corrosion resistant steel (CRES) bolts; rig the MCD, as
applicable; and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated
March 9, 2010, except as required by paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Do
all applicable related investigative and corrective actions at the
applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(h) Repetitive Inspections
Repeat the applicable inspections specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD, as specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of
this AD, at the applicable times specified in table 1 of paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091,
dated March 9, 2010. The inspection conditions are defined in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(1) For airplanes found with Inspection Condition 5: Repeat the
general visual inspection for broken, cracked, missing, or migrated
parts of the cam latches and latch pins.
(2) For airplanes found with Inspection Condition 2, 4.2, or 5:
Repeat the detailed inspection for damage, distress, and incorrect
rigging of the cam latches and latch pins.
(3) For airplanes found with Inspection Condition 5: Repeat the
high frequency eddy current or magnetic particle inspection to
detect signs of cracking of cam latches 1 and 2.
(i) MCD Post-Rigging Initial Inspections and Related Investigative and
Corrective Actions
At the applicable times specified in table 2 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated
March 9, 2010: Do a general visual inspection of the cam latches and
latch pins for discrepancies; a detailed inspection of the cam
latches and latch pins for discrepancies; and an HFEC or magnetic
particle inspection of cam latch 1 and cam latch 2 for cracking; and
do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions,
except as required by paragraph (l)(2) of this AD; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions at the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(j) MCD Post-Rigging Repetitive Inspections
(1) For all airplanes: Repeat the inspections specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD, at the applicable times specified in table
2 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(2) For airplanes found with Inspection Condition 2 as defined
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010:
Repeat the detailed inspection for damage, distress, and incorrect
rigging of the cam latches and latch pins specified in paragraph (i)
of this AD on remaining cam latches and cam pins at the applicable
times specified in table 2 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March 9, 2010.
(k) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
alloy steel bolt as a cross bolt through any latch pin fitting
assembly in the lower sill of the MCD on any airplane.
(l) Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
The following exceptions apply in this AD.
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March
9, 2010, specifies a compliance time after the date of that service
bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-52A0091, dated March
9, 2010, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before
further flight, repair the discrepancy in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle, Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(n) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Kimberly DeVoe,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: (425) 917-6495 ; fax:
(425) 917-6590; email: kimberly.devoe@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 28, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-08450 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P