Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District and South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21542-21545 [2013-08261]
Download as PDF
21542
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 10, 2013.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the Proposed Rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: January 14, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(419)(i)(C) and
(c)(423)(i)(B) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(419) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Butte County Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 207, ‘‘Wood Burning
Devices,’’ amended on December 11,
2008.
*
*
*
*
*
(423) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Sacramento Metropolitan Air
Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 417, ‘‘Wood Burning
Appliances,’’ adopted on October 26,
2006.
[FR Doc. 2013–08246 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0828; FRL–9776–6]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara
County Air Pollution Control District
and South Coast Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the Santa
Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District (SBCAPCD) and South Coast Air
Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) portions of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) emissions from gas-fired fan-type
central furnaces, small water heaters,
and the transfer and dispensing of
gasoline. We are approving local rules
that regulate these emission sources
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
21543
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
This rule is effective on June 10,
2013 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 13,
2013. If we receive such comments, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2012–0828, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
DATES:
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
section.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA recommendations To Further
Improve the Rules.
D. Public Comment and Final Action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are
approving with the dates that they were
amended by the local air agencies and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
SBCAPCD .......................
352
SCAQMD .........................
461
Natural Gas-Fire Fan-Type Central Furnaces and Small Water
Heaters.
Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing ................................................
On March 13, 2012 and October 11,
2012, EPA determined that the
submittal for SBCAPCD Rule 352 and
SCAQMD Rule 461 met the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51
Appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
We approved an earlier version of
SBCAPCD Rule 352 into the SIP on
December 20, 2000 (65 FR 79752). We
approved an earlier version of SCAQMD
Rule 461 into the SIP on April 11, 2006
(71 FR 18216). The SCAQMD adopted
revisions to the SIP-approved version on
March 7, 2008 but the revision was not
submitted to EPA. While we can act on
only the most recently submitted
version, we have reviewed materials
from previous rule revisions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Amended/
revised
Rule title
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
VOCs help produce ground-level
ozone and smog, which harm human
health and the environment. NOX helps
produce ground-level ozone, smog and
particulate matter, which harm human
health and the environment. Section
110(a) of the CAA requires States to
submit regulations that control VOC and
NOX emissions. SBCAPCD Rule 352
limits emissions from gas-fired fan-type
central furnaces and small water heaters
and SCAQMD Rule 461 controls
emissions from the transfer and
dispensing of gasoline. EPA’s technical
support documents (TSD) have more
information about these rules.
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
Generally, SIP rules must be
enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) for each
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
10/20/11
02/23/12
04/06/12
09/21/12
category of sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
as well as each major source in
nonattainment areas (see sections
182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax
existing requirements (see sections
110(l) and 193). The SCAQMD regulates
an ozone nonattainment area (see 40
CFR part 81), so Rule 461 must fulfill
RACT. SBCAPCD is designated as
unclassifiable/attainment for all
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) so that submitted Rule 352
does not have to fulfill RACT
requirements.
Guidance and policy documents that
we use to evaluate enforceability and
RACT requirements consistently
include the following:
1. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,’’ EPA, May 25, 1988 (the
Bluebook).
2. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
21544
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region 9, August 21,
2001 (the Little Bluebook).
3. ‘‘Gasoline Vapor Recovery
Guidelines’’, EPA Region IX, April 24,
2000.
4. ‘‘Technical Guidance—Stage II
vapor Recovery Systems for Control of
Vehicle Refueling Emissions at Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities.’’ (EPA–450/3–91–
022a) November 1991.
5. ‘‘EPA’s Draft Model Rule, Gasoline
Dispensing Facility—Stage II Vapor
Recovery,’’ August 17, 1992.
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
We believe these rules are consistent
with the relevant policy and guidance
regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP
relaxations. The TSDs have more
information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Improve the Rules
The TSDs describe additional rule
revisions that we recommend for the
next time the local agencies modify the
rules.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, EPA is fully approving the
submitted rules because we believe they
fulfill all relevant requirements. We do
not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without
proposing it in advance. However, in
the Proposed Rules section of this
Federal Register, we are simultaneously
proposing approval of the same
submitted rules. If we receive adverse
comments by May 13, 2013, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not
receive timely adverse comments, the
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on June 10, 2013.
This will incorporate these rules into
the federally enforceable SIP.
Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if
that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 10, 2013.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the Proposed Rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: January 23, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220, is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(411)(i)(G) and
(c)(423)(i)(C) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(411) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) Santa Barbara County Air
Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 352, ‘‘Natural Gas-Fired FanType Central Furnaces and Small Water
Heaters,’’ revised on October 20, 2011.
*
*
*
*
*
(423) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 461, ‘‘Gasoline Transfer and
Dispensing,’’ amended on April 6, 2012.
[FR Doc. 2013–08261 Filed 4–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0886; FRL–9778–4]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley
Air Quality Management District and
Monterey Bay Unified and Santa
Barbara County Air Pollution Control
Districts
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District (AVAQMD) and
Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution
Control District (MBUAPCD) and Santa
Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District (SBCAPCD) portions of the
SUMMARY:
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). Under authority of the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act), we are approving local rules that
address emission statements for
AVAQMD, rule rescissions that
addresses public records for MBUAPCD,
and define terms for SBCAPCD.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 10,
2013 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 13,
2013. If we receive such comments, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2012–0886, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
21545
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. Public Comment and Final Action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are
approving and the rules we are
rescinding with the dates that they were
adopted by the local air agencies and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Local
agency
Rule No.
Rule title
AVAQMD .........................
MBUAPCD .......................
MBUAPCD .......................
MBUAPCD .......................
MBUAPCD .......................
MBUAPCD .......................
107
900
901
902
903
904
SBCAPCD .......................
102
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:35 Apr 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Adopted
Certification of Submissions and Emission Statements ................
Inspection of Public Records—Disclosure Policy (rescinded) ......
Public Records—Definitions (rescinded) .......................................
Districts Request for Information (rescinded) ................................
Inspection of Public Records—Disclosure Procedure (rescinded)
Trade Secrets—Procedure When Inspection is Requested (rescinded).
Definitions ......................................................................................
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Submitted
05/15/12
04/20/05
04/20/05
04/20/05
04/20/05
04/20/05
09/21/12
07/15/05
07/15/05
07/15/05
07/15/05
07/15/05
06/21/12
09/21/12
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21542-21545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08261]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0828; FRL-9776-6]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Santa
Barbara County Air Pollution Control District and South Coast Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) and South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portions of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
volatile organic compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
emissions from gas-fired fan-type central furnaces, small water
heaters, and the transfer and dispensing of gasoline. We are approving
local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).
[[Page 21543]]
DATES: This rule is effective on June 10, 2013 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by May 13, 2013. If we receive
such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2012-0828, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some
information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA recommendations To Further Improve the Rules.
D. Public Comment and Final Action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they
were amended by the local air agencies and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended/
Local agency Rule No. Rule title revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBCAPCD............................ 352 Natural Gas-Fire Fan-Type 10/20/11 02/23/12
Central Furnaces and Small
Water Heaters.
SCAQMD............................. 461 Gasoline Transfer and 04/06/12 09/21/12
Dispensing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 13, 2012 and October 11, 2012, EPA determined that the
submittal for SBCAPCD Rule 352 and SCAQMD Rule 461 met the completeness
criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal
EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
We approved an earlier version of SBCAPCD Rule 352 into the SIP on
December 20, 2000 (65 FR 79752). We approved an earlier version of
SCAQMD Rule 461 into the SIP on April 11, 2006 (71 FR 18216). The
SCAQMD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved version on March 7, 2008
but the revision was not submitted to EPA. While we can act on only the
most recently submitted version, we have reviewed materials from
previous rule revisions.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human
health and the environment. NOX helps produce ground-level
ozone, smog and particulate matter, which harm human health and the
environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit
regulations that control VOC and NOX emissions. SBCAPCD Rule
352 limits emissions from gas-fired fan-type central furnaces and small
water heaters and SCAQMD Rule 461 controls emissions from the transfer
and dispensing of gasoline. EPA's technical support documents (TSD)
have more information about these rules.
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines
(CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see
sections 182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax existing
requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). The SCAQMD regulates an
ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR part 81), so Rule 461 must fulfill
RACT. SBCAPCD is designated as unclassifiable/attainment for all
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) so that submitted Rule
352 does not have to fulfill RACT requirements.
Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the
following:
1. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
[[Page 21544]]
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
3. ``Gasoline Vapor Recovery Guidelines'', EPA Region IX, April 24,
2000.
4. ``Technical Guidance--Stage II vapor Recovery Systems for
Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities.'' (EPA-450/3-91-022a) November 1991.
5. ``EPA's Draft Model Rule, Gasoline Dispensing Facility--Stage II
Vapor Recovery,'' August 17, 1992.
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSDs
have more information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agencies modify the rules.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by May 13, 2013, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on June 10, 2013. This will incorporate these
rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 10, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: January 23, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 21545]]
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(411)(i)(G) and
(c)(423)(i)(C) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(411) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 352, ``Natural Gas-Fired Fan-Type Central Furnaces and
Small Water Heaters,'' revised on October 20, 2011.
* * * * *
(423) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 461, ``Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing,'' amended on
April 6, 2012.
[FR Doc. 2013-08261 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P