Superior Supplier Incentive Program, 21116-21118 [2013-08190]
Download as PDF
21116
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DOD–2013–OS–0080]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Defense Security Service, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Defense
Security Service (DSS) announces the
proposed extension of a public
information collection and seeks public
comment on the provisions thereof.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by June 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include agency name, docket
number, and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
Any associated form(s) for this
collection may be located within this
same electronic docket and downloaded
for review/testing. Follow the
instructions at https://
www.regulations.gov for submitting
comments. Please submit comments on
any given form identified by docket
number, form number, and title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to: Defense Security
Service, ISFO, ATTN: Ms. Sharon
Bickmore, Russell-Knox Building, 27130
Telegraph Road, Quantico, VA 22134–
2253, or call Defense Security Service at
(571) 305–6620.
Title, Associated Form, and OMB
Number: Voice of Industry Survey, OMB
Control Number 0704–0472.
Needs and Uses: Executive Order
12829, ‘‘National Industrial Security
Program (NISP)’’ Section 202(a)
stipulates that the Secretary of Defense
shall serve as the Executive Agent for
inspecting and monitoring the
contractors, licensees, and grantees who
require or will require access to or who
store or will store classified information;
and for determining the eligibility for
access to classified information of
contractors, licensees, and grantees and
their respective employees. The
Executive Agent has the authority to
issue, after consultation with affected
agencies, standard forms or other
standardization that will promote the
implementation of the NISP.
Department of Defense Directive
5105.42, ‘‘Defense Security Service,’’
dated August 3, 2010, delineates the
mission, functions, and responsibilities
of DSS. DSS functions and
responsibilities include the
administration and implementation of
the Defense portion of the NISP.
This survey will provide feedback on
how DSS is performing with respect to
the administration and implementation
of the NISP. Participation in the survey
is strictly voluntary.
Affected Public: Contractors,
licensees, and grantees in the NISP
under DSS cognizance.
Annual Burden Hours: 6,119.
Number of Respondents: 12,238.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Average Burden per Response: 30
minutes.
Frequency: Annually.
Dated: April 2, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–08185 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Superior Supplier Incentive Program
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice of proposed policy letter.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY: The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Navy, Acquisition and
Procurement (DASN (AP)), is soliciting
comments that the Department of the
Navy (DoN) may use in drafting a policy
that will establish a Superior Supplier
Incentive Program (SSIP). Under the
SSIP, contractors that have
demonstrated exemplary performance at
the business unit level in the areas of
cost, schedule, performance, quality,
and business relations would be granted
Superior Supplier Status (SSS).
Contractors that achieve SSS could
receive more favorable contract terms
and conditions in DoN contracts. In
addition to recognition of SSS at the
business unit level, multi-business unit
corporations, that have several business
units which attain SSS, may receive
additional recognition by the DoN at the
corporate level. This additional
corporate recognition will not result in
the receipt of more favorable contract
terms and conditions in DoN contracts,
but may result in the use of more
favorable business practices by the DoN
in its relations at the corporate level.
Upon approval of the policy by the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy for
Research, Development and
Acquisition, DoN will initiate the pilot
phase of the SSIP.
The SSIP pilot is a revision of DoN’s
previous initiative to recognize superior
performance. This initiative was known
as the Preferred Supplier Program (PSP).
DoN published a previous notice of
proposed policy letter on May 14, 2010.
Summary of Information Collection
DATES:
This collection of information
requests the assistance of the facility
security officer (FSO) or senior
management official to provide feedback
as to how DSS is doing with respect to
the administration and implementation
of the NISP. The survey will be
distributed electronically via a webbased, commercial survey tool.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DoN invites interested parties
from both the public and private sectors
to provide comments to be considered
in the formulation of the final policy
letter. In particular, DoN encourages
respondents to offer their views as
discussed below, in Section C,
‘‘Solicitation of Public Comment.’’
Interested parties should submit
comments, in writing, to the address
below, on or before May 3, 2013.
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Email: SSIP@navy.mil; Facsimile:
703–614–9394; Mail: DASN (AP), Attn:
Clarence Belton, 1000 Navy Pentagon,
Room BF992, Washington, DC 20350–
1000.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite ‘‘Proposed DoN SSIP
Policy Letter’’ in all correspondence. All
comments received will be posted,
without change or redaction, to https://
acquisition.navy.mil/rda/home/
acquisition_one_source/
business_opportunities/SSIP, so
commenters should not include
information that they do not wish to be
posted (for example, personal or
business-confidential).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clarence Belton, 703–693–4006 or
clarence.belton@navy.mil.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Background
Companies in the private sector that
have implemented SSIPs have
significantly improved performance.
Cash flow, contract terms and
conditions, and relief from nonstatutory compliance requirements,
either procedurally or with respect to
timing, can reduce contractor costs and
risk; and, as such, are powerful
incentives that can be used to motivate
contractors to perform at a high level.
DoN and its contractors negotiate these
key components of the business
arrangement contract by contract. As a
result of this decentralized and
individualized approach, DoN fails to
take advantage of an extremely
important opportunity to motivate
industry behavior. This policy would
establish the SSIP to leverage that
opportunity through the use of favorable
contract terms and conditions and other
changes in business process that would
be available to Superior Suppliers (i.e.,
suppliers that have demonstrated
exemplary performance, at the business
unit or corporate level, in the areas of
cost, schedule, performance, quality,
and business relations).
The proposed policy has been revised
from the original concept of the PSP.
DoN is again considering comments to
capture the public’s views as it revises
the concept of operations for SSIP. After
consideration of the comments, DoN
may publish a draft proposed policy
letter for additional public comments.
B. Proposed Policy Letter Concepts
The general outline of the pilot phase
of the SSIP, to be established under the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
proposed policy letter, is set forth
below.
Assessment of contractors for
designation as Superior Suppliers will
be conducted by teams consisting of
members from the DoN’s Echelon II
contracting activities. These contracting
activities are identified in Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement 202.101. Contracting
activities may be assigned as evaluation
team leads, based on the volume of
contracting activity between a
contractor under evaluation and a
particular contracting activity. DASN
(AP) will oversee the assessment of
contractors under the SSIP. DASN (AP)
will make recommendations to a panel
of senior DoN leaders as to which
companies should be designated as
Superior Suppliers. The panel will
include the Assistant Secretary of the
Navy for Research, Development and
Acquisition and may include the Vice
Chief of Naval Operations; the Assistant
Commandant of the Marine Corps; and
Commander, Fleet Forces Command; or
their representatives.
DoN will use the Contractor
Performance Assessment Reporting
System (CPARS) as the baseline data
during the pilot phase of the SSIP. In
the course of the pilot phase, DoN may
also identify other sources of data,
including information available to DoN
program offices and government
contract administration organizations
that the DoN may use to supplement
CPARS data in implementing the SSIP.
During the pilot phase, contractors will
be assessed in the following CPARS
areas:
• Technical (Quality of Product).
• Schedule.
• Cost Control.
• Management Responsiveness.
• Management of Key Personnel.
• Utilization of Small Business.
• Other CPARS Factors As
Appropriate.
During the SSIP pilot phase, DoN will
use a 5-star rating system based upon
the 5-color ratings used in CPARS, as
follows:
21117
designated as a Superior Supplier. A 5–
Star rating can only be achieved if the
contractor maintains an active Energy
Efficiency Program, and otherwise has
received a 4–Star rating. Failure to
demonstrate an active Energy Efficiency
Program will not diminish the
contractor’s SSIP rating. If a contractor
provides documentation sufficient to
establish that it has an Energy Efficiency
Program, it will receive an additional
star, up to a maximum rating of 5 Stars.
For the pilot, DoN intends to evaluate
the top 15 DoN contractors that supply
goods and the top 15 DoN contractors
that supply services. The top 15 DoN
contractors will be determined by the
value of contract awards for the most
recent fiscal year at the business unit
level. A business unit can only be rated
in either the goods or services category.
In the event a contractor is within the
top 15 suppliers of both goods and
services, it will be evaluated in the
category that represents the
preponderance of sales to the DoN.
DoN plans to seek policy changes that
will allow it to offer more favorable
terms and conditions to its preferred
suppliers. Once approved, DoN
contracting officers will be authorized to
offer some or all of the following more
favorable contract terms and conditions:
• More favorable progress payments.
Adjustments may be made to progress
payment percentages or retention
percentages.
• Priority for adjudication of final
labor and indirect cost rates.
• Increase in the intervals between
business system reviews.
C. Solicitation of Public Comment
DoN invites interested parties from
both the public and private sectors to
provide comments for consideration in
the formulation of a policy letter
establishing the SSIP. In particular, DoN
seeks to better understand how to
incentivize contractors, to achieve
sustained superior performance in the
areas of cost, schedule, performance,
quality, and business relations.
Accordingly, DoN welcomes feedback
regarding the following questions.
Number of
1. What clauses are currently being
CPARS color rating
stars
used in government subcontracts, and
Red ...........................................
0 commercial contracts and subcontracts,
Yellow .......................................
1 to incentivize superior performance, at
Green ........................................
2 the corporate level, in the areas of cost,
Purple .......................................
3 schedule, performance, quality, and
Dark Blue ..................................
4 business relations?
2. What solicitation provisions,
DoN will use the CPARS conversion
contract clauses, and performance
table above, based upon CPARS data;
incentives will provide contractors with
and, as appropriate, may use other
the greatest motivation to achieve SSS?
sources of information and may weight
3. What contract terms and conditions
evaluation factors. Contractors must
increase cost or impair performance and
achieve at least a 3–Star rating to be
could be removed from contracts with
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
21118
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
Superior Suppliers without significant
risk to the Government?
4. Energy Efficiency is a critical DoN
requirement significantly impacting the
successful achievement of DoN’s
missions. How should a contractor’s use
of energy as it relates to the entire lifecycle of a product—design,
manufacture, use, maintenance, and
disposal—be considered in the
designation of Superior Suppliers?
5. How long should SSS last?
6. What criteria, other than CPARS
data elements, should DoN use to select
companies for evaluation as superior
suppliers?
7. Is there any other aspect of the
proposed SSIP on which you wish to
comment?
Dated: April 1, 2013.
C. K. Chiappetta,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–08190 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2013–ICCD–0009]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Private School Universe Survey
2013–16
Institute of Education Sciences/
National Center for Education Statistics
(IES), Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing a revision of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before May 9,
2013.
Comments submitted in
response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting
Docket ID number ED–2013–ICCD–0009
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. Please note that
comments submitted by fax or email
and those submitted after the comment
period will not be accepted. Written
requests for information or comments
submitted by postal mail or delivery
should be addressed to the Director of
the Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E105,Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Electronically mail
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please do not
send comments here.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Private School
Universe Survey 2013–16.
OMB Control Number: 1850–0641.
Type of Review: Revision of an
existing collection of information.
Respondents/Affected Public: Private
Sector.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 25,567.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 6,410.
Abstract: The Private School Universe
Survey (PSS) is the NCES collection of
basic data from the universe of private
elementary and secondary schools in
the United States. The PSS is designed
to gather biennial data on the total
number of private schools, teachers, and
students, along with a variety of related
data, including: religious orientation;
grade-levels taught and size of school;
length of school year and of school day;
total student enrollment by gender (K–
12); number of high school graduates;
whether a school is single-sexed or
coeducational; number of teachers
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
employed; program emphasis; and
existence and type of its kindergarten
program. The PSS includes all schools
that are not supported primarily by
public funds, that provide classroom
instruction for one or more of grades K–
12 or comparable ungraded levels, and
that have one or more teachers. The PSS
is also used to create a universe list of
private schools that can be used as a
sampling frame for NCES surveys of
private schools. No substantive changes
have been made to the survey or its
procedures since its last approved PSS
2010–13. This clearance is for the 2013–
14 and 2015–16 PSS data collections,
and the 2015–16 PSS list- and areaframe building operations.
Dated: April 3, 2013.
Stephanie Valentine,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Privacy, Information and
Records Management Services, Office of
Management.
[FR Doc. 2013–08248 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2013–ICCD–0042]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request;
Streamlined Clearance Process for
Discretionary Grants
Department of Education (ED),
Office of the Secretary/Office of the
Deputy Secretary (OS).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 10,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted in
response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting
Docket ID number ED–2013–ICCD–0042
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. Please note that
comments submitted by fax or email
and those submitted after the comment
period will not be accepted. Written
requests for information or comments
submitted by postal mail or delivery
should be addressed to the Director of
the Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E105, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21116-21118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08190]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Superior Supplier Incentive Program
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of proposed policy letter.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Acquisition and
Procurement (DASN (AP)), is soliciting comments that the Department of
the Navy (DoN) may use in drafting a policy that will establish a
Superior Supplier Incentive Program (SSIP). Under the SSIP, contractors
that have demonstrated exemplary performance at the business unit level
in the areas of cost, schedule, performance, quality, and business
relations would be granted Superior Supplier Status (SSS). Contractors
that achieve SSS could receive more favorable contract terms and
conditions in DoN contracts. In addition to recognition of SSS at the
business unit level, multi-business unit corporations, that have
several business units which attain SSS, may receive additional
recognition by the DoN at the corporate level. This additional
corporate recognition will not result in the receipt of more favorable
contract terms and conditions in DoN contracts, but may result in the
use of more favorable business practices by the DoN in its relations at
the corporate level. Upon approval of the policy by the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition, DoN
will initiate the pilot phase of the SSIP.
The SSIP pilot is a revision of DoN's previous initiative to
recognize superior performance. This initiative was known as the
Preferred Supplier Program (PSP). DoN published a previous notice of
proposed policy letter on May 14, 2010.
DATES: DoN invites interested parties from both the public and private
sectors to provide comments to be considered in the formulation of the
final policy letter. In particular, DoN encourages respondents to offer
their views as discussed below, in Section C, ``Solicitation of Public
Comment.'' Interested parties should submit comments, in writing, to
the address below, on or before May 3, 2013.
[[Page 21117]]
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Email: SSIP@navy.mil; Facsimile: 703-614-9394; Mail: DASN (AP),
Attn: Clarence Belton, 1000 Navy Pentagon, Room BF992, Washington, DC
20350-1000.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite ``Proposed DoN
SSIP Policy Letter'' in all correspondence. All comments received will
be posted, without change or redaction, to https://acquisition.navy.mil/rda/home/acquisition_one_source/business_opportunities/SSIP, so commenters should not include information that
they do not wish to be posted (for example, personal or business-
confidential).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clarence Belton, 703-693-4006 or
clarence.belton@navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Companies in the private sector that have implemented SSIPs have
significantly improved performance. Cash flow, contract terms and
conditions, and relief from non-statutory compliance requirements,
either procedurally or with respect to timing, can reduce contractor
costs and risk; and, as such, are powerful incentives that can be used
to motivate contractors to perform at a high level. DoN and its
contractors negotiate these key components of the business arrangement
contract by contract. As a result of this decentralized and
individualized approach, DoN fails to take advantage of an extremely
important opportunity to motivate industry behavior. This policy would
establish the SSIP to leverage that opportunity through the use of
favorable contract terms and conditions and other changes in business
process that would be available to Superior Suppliers (i.e., suppliers
that have demonstrated exemplary performance, at the business unit or
corporate level, in the areas of cost, schedule, performance, quality,
and business relations).
The proposed policy has been revised from the original concept of
the PSP. DoN is again considering comments to capture the public's
views as it revises the concept of operations for SSIP. After
consideration of the comments, DoN may publish a draft proposed policy
letter for additional public comments.
B. Proposed Policy Letter Concepts
The general outline of the pilot phase of the SSIP, to be
established under the proposed policy letter, is set forth below.
Assessment of contractors for designation as Superior Suppliers
will be conducted by teams consisting of members from the DoN's Echelon
II contracting activities. These contracting activities are identified
in Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 202.101.
Contracting activities may be assigned as evaluation team leads, based
on the volume of contracting activity between a contractor under
evaluation and a particular contracting activity. DASN (AP) will
oversee the assessment of contractors under the SSIP. DASN (AP) will
make recommendations to a panel of senior DoN leaders as to which
companies should be designated as Superior Suppliers. The panel will
include the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development
and Acquisition and may include the Vice Chief of Naval Operations; the
Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps; and Commander, Fleet Forces
Command; or their representatives.
DoN will use the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System
(CPARS) as the baseline data during the pilot phase of the SSIP. In the
course of the pilot phase, DoN may also identify other sources of data,
including information available to DoN program offices and government
contract administration organizations that the DoN may use to
supplement CPARS data in implementing the SSIP. During the pilot phase,
contractors will be assessed in the following CPARS areas:
Technical (Quality of Product).
Schedule.
Cost Control.
Management Responsiveness.
Management of Key Personnel.
Utilization of Small Business.
Other CPARS Factors As Appropriate.
During the SSIP pilot phase, DoN will use a 5-star rating system
based upon the 5-color ratings used in CPARS, as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
CPARS color rating stars
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Red........................................................ 0
Yellow..................................................... 1
Green...................................................... 2
Purple..................................................... 3
Dark Blue.................................................. 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DoN will use the CPARS conversion table above, based upon CPARS
data; and, as appropriate, may use other sources of information and may
weight evaluation factors. Contractors must achieve at least a 3-Star
rating to be designated as a Superior Supplier. A 5-Star rating can
only be achieved if the contractor maintains an active Energy
Efficiency Program, and otherwise has received a 4-Star rating. Failure
to demonstrate an active Energy Efficiency Program will not diminish
the contractor's SSIP rating. If a contractor provides documentation
sufficient to establish that it has an Energy Efficiency Program, it
will receive an additional star, up to a maximum rating of 5 Stars.
For the pilot, DoN intends to evaluate the top 15 DoN contractors
that supply goods and the top 15 DoN contractors that supply services.
The top 15 DoN contractors will be determined by the value of contract
awards for the most recent fiscal year at the business unit level. A
business unit can only be rated in either the goods or services
category. In the event a contractor is within the top 15 suppliers of
both goods and services, it will be evaluated in the category that
represents the preponderance of sales to the DoN.
DoN plans to seek policy changes that will allow it to offer more
favorable terms and conditions to its preferred suppliers. Once
approved, DoN contracting officers will be authorized to offer some or
all of the following more favorable contract terms and conditions:
More favorable progress payments. Adjustments may be made
to progress payment percentages or retention percentages.
Priority for adjudication of final labor and indirect cost
rates.
Increase in the intervals between business system reviews.
C. Solicitation of Public Comment
DoN invites interested parties from both the public and private
sectors to provide comments for consideration in the formulation of a
policy letter establishing the SSIP. In particular, DoN seeks to better
understand how to incentivize contractors, to achieve sustained
superior performance in the areas of cost, schedule, performance,
quality, and business relations. Accordingly, DoN welcomes feedback
regarding the following questions.
1. What clauses are currently being used in government
subcontracts, and commercial contracts and subcontracts, to incentivize
superior performance, at the corporate level, in the areas of cost,
schedule, performance, quality, and business relations?
2. What solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and performance
incentives will provide contractors with the greatest motivation to
achieve SSS?
3. What contract terms and conditions increase cost or impair
performance and could be removed from contracts with
[[Page 21118]]
Superior Suppliers without significant risk to the Government?
4. Energy Efficiency is a critical DoN requirement significantly
impacting the successful achievement of DoN's missions. How should a
contractor's use of energy as it relates to the entire life-cycle of a
product--design, manufacture, use, maintenance, and disposal--be
considered in the designation of Superior Suppliers?
5. How long should SSS last?
6. What criteria, other than CPARS data elements, should DoN use to
select companies for evaluation as superior suppliers?
7. Is there any other aspect of the proposed SSIP on which you wish
to comment?
Dated: April 1, 2013.
C. K. Chiappetta,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-08190 Filed 4-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P