Safety Zones; Marine Week Air Ground Demonstration, Lake Washington; Seattle, WA, 20852-20855 [2013-08039]
Download as PDF
20852
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 67 / Monday, April 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves special local regulations
issued in conjunction with a regatta or
marine parade. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add § 100.35–T05–0156 to read as
follows:
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 100.35–T05–0156 Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; Potomac
River, National Harbor Access Channel, MD.
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is established as special
local regulations. All coordinates are
North American Datum 1983.
(1) Regulated Area: All water of the
Potomac River, from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded to the north by a
line drawn that originates at Jones Point
Park, VA at the west shoreline latitude
38°47′35″ N, longitude 077°02′22″ W,
thence east to latitude 38°47′12″ N,
longitude 077°00′58″ W, at east
shoreline near National Harbor, MD.
The regulated area is bounded to the
south by a line drawn originating at
George Washington Memorial Parkway
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Apr 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
highway overpass and Cameron Run,
west shoreline latitude 38°47′23″ N,
longitude 077°03′03″ W thence east to
latitude 38°46′52″ N, longitude
077°01′13″ W, at east shoreline near
National Harbor, MD.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U. S.
Coast Guard who has been designated
by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(3) Participant means all persons and
vessels participating in the Swim Across
the Potomac event under the auspices of
the Marine Event Permit issued to the
event sponsor and approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(c) Special local regulations. (1) The
Coast Guard Patrol Commander may
forbid and control the movement of all
vessels and persons in the regulated
area. When hailed or signaled by an
official patrol vessel, a vessel or person
in the regulated area shall immediately
comply with the directions given.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion
from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the
regulated area must first obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or his designated
representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port
Baltimore and his designated
representatives can be contacted at
telephone number 410–576–2693 or on
Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). All Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this regulated area can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) The Coast Guard Patrol
Commander may terminate the event, or
the operation of any participant in the
event, at any time it is deemed
necessary for the protection of life or
property.
(4) The Coast Guard will publish a
notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District
Local Notice to Mariners and issue a
marine information broadcast on VHF–
FM marine band radio announcing
specific event date and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section
will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 11
a.m. on June 2, 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dated: March 21, 2013.
Kevin C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2013–08040 Filed 4–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0124]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Marine Week Air Ground
Demonstration, Lake Washington;
Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Coast Guard
proposes to establish safety zones
around vessels and persons involved in
the Marine Week Seattle Special Marine
Air Ground Task Force Demonstration
on Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. This
event will occur from August 9, 2013,
until August 11, 2013. A safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
maritime public during this event,
which involves demonstrations of low
flying aircraft, amphibious vehicles,
swimmers, combat equipment, and
other elements that could create safety
concerns for waterway users. This safety
zone would ensure the safety of the
maritime public by prohibiting any
person or vessel from entering or
remaining in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) or a Designated Representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329. See the ‘‘Public Participation
and Request for Comments’’ portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 67 / Monday, April 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LTJG Anthony P. LaBoy,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector Puget Sound; Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6045, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0124] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2; by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Apr 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0124) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for one using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard received a marine
event permit application from the
United States Marine Corps on February
5, 2013. From August 5 to August 11,
2013, Special Purpose Marine Air
Ground Task Force Marine Week Seattle
will conduct Marine Week Seattle in
order to showcase and demonstrate the
value of the Marine Corps; cultivate
relationships with local government,
academia, and business communities;
reinforce recruiting efforts; promote
modernization of equipment and
training; promote the Corps’ Marine Air
Ground Task Force and expeditionary
agility; and, emphasize the Corps’
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20853
diversity in its ‘‘one team-one fight’’
ethos.
The Ports and Waterways Safety Act,
33 U.S.C. 1221–1232, authorizes the
Coast Guard to establish safety zones
under 33 U.S.C. 1226(b)(1). The Coast
Guard proposes to establish this safety
zone during the Marine Week
Demonstration on Lake Washington,
Seattle, WA. The safety zone will help
ensure the safety of the maritime public
by prohibiting any person or vessel from
entering or remaining in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) or a Designated
Representative.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Marine Air Ground Task Force
Demonstration Area will include low
flying aircraft, amphibious vehicles,
swimmers, combat equipment, and
other elements. The following proposed
safety zone is for the Marine Air Ground
Task Force Demonstration Area: All
waters of Lake Washington
encompassed by the following points:
47°33′50″ N, 122°14′51″ W, thence
northwesterly to 47°35′12″ N 122°16′25″
W, thence southwesterly to 47°34′56″ N,
122°17′9″ W; thence south easterly
along the shoreline to 47°33′32″ N,
122°15′50″ W, thence northwesterly
back to the point of origin.
A second proposed safety zone will be
used by amphibious vehicles transiting
from Proctor’s Landing into the
demonstration area and will be kept
clear to allow emergency response
vessels to transit and respond to
medical emergencies. The following
area is the proposed safety zone for the
Access Lane: All waters of Lake
Washington encompassed by the
following points: 47°34′49″ N,
122°14′58″ W, thence northwesterly to
47°34′59″ N, 122°15′10″ W, thence
southwesterly to 47°34′41″ N,
122°15′49″ W; thence southeasterly to
47°34′27″ N, 122°15′34″ W, thence back
to the point of origin.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
20854
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 67 / Monday, April 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This finding is based on the fact
that the waters encompassed by the
proposed Safety Zone are not frequented
by commercial navigation, and the zone
is small in size and short in duration.
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will
affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners
or operators of vessels intending to
transit this portion of Lake Washington
during the time this regulation is in
effect. The zone will not have a
significant economic impact because it
is limited in size and short in duration.
The only vessels likely to be impacted
will be recreational boaters and small
passenger vessel operators.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action″ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Apr 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 67 / Monday, April 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
2. Add section 165.T13–244 to read as
follows:
40 CFR Part 52
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.T13–244 Safety Zone; Marine Week
Air Ground Demonstration, Lake
Washington; Seattle, WA.
(a) Locations. The following areas are
designated as a safety zone:
(1) Marine Air Ground Task Force
Demonstration Area: All waters of Lake
Washington encompassed by the
following points: 47°33′50″ N,
122°14′51″ W, thence northwesterly to
47°35′12″ N, 122°16′25″ W, thence
southwesterly to 47°34′56″ N, 122°17′9″
W; thence southeasterly along the
shoreline to 47°33′32″ N, 122°15′50″ W,
thence northwesterly back to the point
of origin.
(2) Access Lane: All waters of Lake
Washington encompassed by the
following points: 47°34′49″ N,
122°14′58″ W, thence northwesterly to
47°34′59″ N, 122°15′10″ W, thence
southwesterly to 47°34′41″ N,
122°15′49″ W; thence southeasterly to
47°34′27″ N, 122°15′34″ W, thence back
to the point of origin.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, Subpart C, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the safety zone
created by this section without the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
his Designated Representative.
Designated Representatives are Coast
Guard Personnel authorized by the
Captain of the Port to grant persons or
vessels permission to enter or remain in
the safety zones created by this section.
See 33 CFR part 165, Subpart C, for
additional information and
requirements. The COTP may be
assisted by other federal, state or local
agencies with the enforcement of this
safety zone.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the COTP or a
Designated Representative by contacting
the on-scene Coast Guard patrol craft on
VHF 13 or Ch 16. Requests must include
the reason why movement within this
area is necessary. Vessel operators
granted permission to enter the safety
zone shall transit at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain course.
(d) Effective Period. This rule is
effective from 6:00 a.m. on August 9,
2013 through 11:59 p.m. on August 11,
2013.
Dated: March 4, 2013.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2013–08039 Filed 4–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Apr 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0322; FRL–9799–7]
RIN 2060–AR68
State Implementation Plans: Response
to Petition for Rulemaking; Findings of
Substantial Inadequacy; and SIP Calls
To Amend Provisions Applying to
Excess Emissions During Periods of
Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of extension of public
comment period.
AGENCY:
The EPA is announcing an
extension of the public comment period
for its proposal titled, ‘‘State
Implementation Plans: Response to
Petition for Rulemaking; Findings of
Substantial Inadequacy; and SIP Calls to
Amend Provisions Applying to Excess
Emissions During Periods of Startup,
Shutdown, and Malfunction.’’ The EPA
has received numerous requests for
extension of the comment period
beyond the current deadline of April 11,
2013, and one request that it not extend
the comment period by an additional 60
to 90 days, and in response to those
requests the EPA is extending the
comment period by an additional 30
days.
SUMMARY:
Comments on the proposed rule
published February 22, 2013 (78 FR
12460) must be received on or before
May 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2012–0322, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–9744.
• Mail: Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2012–0322, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
West (Air Docket), 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Mail Code: 6102T,
Washington, DC 20460. Please include a
total of two copies.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA West (Air
Docket), 1301 Constitution Avenue,
Northwest, Room 3334, Washington, DC
20004, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2012–0322. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20855
Instructions. Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–
0322. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any CD you submit.
If the EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA
may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, avoid any
form of encryption, and be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional
information about the EPA’s public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at www.epa.gov/epahome/
dockets.htm. For additional instructions
on submitting comments, go to section
I.A of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket. All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically at
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 67 (Monday, April 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20852-20855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08039]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0124]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Marine Week Air Ground Demonstration, Lake
Washington; Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard proposes to establish safety zones around
vessels and persons involved in the Marine Week Seattle Special Marine
Air Ground Task Force Demonstration on Lake Washington, Seattle, WA.
This event will occur from August 9, 2013, until August 11, 2013. A
safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the maritime public
during this event, which involves demonstrations of low flying
aircraft, amphibious vehicles, swimmers, combat equipment, and other
elements that could create safety concerns for waterway users. This
safety zone would ensure the safety of the maritime public by
prohibiting any person or vessel from entering or remaining in the
safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or a
Designated Representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329. See the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
[[Page 20853]]
duplication, please use only one of these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LTJG Anthony P. LaBoy, Waterways Management Division,
Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6045,
email SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2013-0124] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\; by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0124) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard received a marine event permit application from the
United States Marine Corps on February 5, 2013. From August 5 to August
11, 2013, Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force Marine Week
Seattle will conduct Marine Week Seattle in order to showcase and
demonstrate the value of the Marine Corps; cultivate relationships with
local government, academia, and business communities; reinforce
recruiting efforts; promote modernization of equipment and training;
promote the Corps' Marine Air Ground Task Force and expeditionary
agility; and, emphasize the Corps' diversity in its ``one team-one
fight'' ethos.
The Ports and Waterways Safety Act, 33 U.S.C. 1221-1232, authorizes
the Coast Guard to establish safety zones under 33 U.S.C. 1226(b)(1).
The Coast Guard proposes to establish this safety zone during the
Marine Week Demonstration on Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. The safety
zone will help ensure the safety of the maritime public by prohibiting
any person or vessel from entering or remaining in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or a Designated
Representative.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Marine Air Ground Task Force Demonstration Area will include
low flying aircraft, amphibious vehicles, swimmers, combat equipment,
and other elements. The following proposed safety zone is for the
Marine Air Ground Task Force Demonstration Area: All waters of Lake
Washington encompassed by the following points: 47[deg]33'50'' N,
122[deg]14'51'' W, thence northwesterly to 47[deg]35'12'' N
122[deg]16'25'' W, thence southwesterly to 47[deg]34'56'' N,
122[deg]17'9'' W; thence south easterly along the shoreline to
47[deg]33'32'' N, 122[deg]15'50'' W, thence northwesterly back to the
point of origin.
A second proposed safety zone will be used by amphibious vehicles
transiting from Proctor's Landing into the demonstration area and will
be kept clear to allow emergency response vessels to transit and
respond to medical emergencies. The following area is the proposed
safety zone for the Access Lane: All waters of Lake Washington
encompassed by the following points: 47[deg]34'49'' N, 122[deg]14'58''
W, thence northwesterly to 47[deg]34'59'' N, 122[deg]15'10'' W, thence
southwesterly to 47[deg]34'41'' N, 122[deg]15'49'' W; thence
southeasterly to 47[deg]34'27'' N, 122[deg]15'34'' W, thence back to
the point of origin.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under
[[Page 20854]]
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of
Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under those Orders. This finding is based on the fact that
the waters encompassed by the proposed Safety Zone are not frequented
by commercial navigation, and the zone is small in size and short in
duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit this portion of Lake Washington during the time
this regulation is in effect. The zone will not have a significant
economic impact because it is limited in size and short in duration.
The only vessels likely to be impacted will be recreational boaters and
small passenger vessel operators.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a safety zone. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L.
[[Page 20855]]
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add section 165.T13-244 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-244 Safety Zone; Marine Week Air Ground Demonstration,
Lake Washington; Seattle, WA.
(a) Locations. The following areas are designated as a safety zone:
(1) Marine Air Ground Task Force Demonstration Area: All waters of
Lake Washington encompassed by the following points: 47[deg]33'50'' N,
122[deg]14'51'' W, thence northwesterly to 47[deg]35'12'' N,
122[deg]16'25'' W, thence southwesterly to 47[deg]34'56'' N,
122[deg]17'9'' W; thence southeasterly along the shoreline to
47[deg]33'32'' N, 122[deg]15'50'' W, thence northwesterly back to the
point of origin.
(2) Access Lane: All waters of Lake Washington encompassed by the
following points: 47[deg]34'49'' N, 122[deg]14'58'' W, thence
northwesterly to 47[deg]34'59'' N, 122[deg]15'10'' W, thence
southwesterly to 47[deg]34'41'' N, 122[deg]15'49'' W; thence
southeasterly to 47[deg]34'27'' N, 122[deg]15'34'' W, thence back to
the point of origin.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, Subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
safety zone created by this section without the permission of the
Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative. Designated
Representatives are Coast Guard Personnel authorized by the Captain of
the Port to grant persons or vessels permission to enter or remain in
the safety zones created by this section. See 33 CFR part 165, Subpart
C, for additional information and requirements. The COTP may be
assisted by other federal, state or local agencies with the enforcement
of this safety zone.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to enter the
safety zone must obtain permission from the COTP or a Designated
Representative by contacting the on-scene Coast Guard patrol craft on
VHF 13 or Ch 16. Requests must include the reason why movement within
this area is necessary. Vessel operators granted permission to enter
the safety zone shall transit at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain course.
(d) Effective Period. This rule is effective from 6:00 a.m. on
August 9, 2013 through 11:59 p.m. on August 11, 2013.
Dated: March 4, 2013.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2013-08039 Filed 4-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P