Enhanced Document Requirements To Support Use of the Dolphin Safe Label on Tuna Products, 20604-20611 [2013-07990]
Download as PDF
20604
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
also evaluate the Monroney label
content comprehension and identify
potential tradeoffs involved in
alternative approaches. The results of
this research will help guide effective
changes to the safety ratings section of
the Monroney label, and identify
potential communication approaches to
use in a consumer education program.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
c. Vehicle-CRS Fit Program
As indicated in Section III of this
notice, the agency has already
separately sought public comment
regarding the Vehicle-CRS Fit program
in a Federal Register ‘‘Request for
comments’’ notice published on
February 25, 2011.22 Thus, the agency is
not seeking through this notice to obtain
additional comments on this program.
This proposed voluntary program is
intended to have vehicle manufacturers
evaluate CRSs for compatibility with a
specific vehicle model based on a set of
objective criteria. Vehicle manufacturers
would provide NHTSA with a list of
recommended CRSs that they have
determined fit in their vehicles, and
NHTSA would in turn publish that
information. The agency plans to spotcheck the CRS-vehicle combinations to
ensure they actually comply with the
requirements of the new voluntary
Vehicle-CRS Fit program. A final
decision notice for this program is
currently being developed.
d. Child Seat Ease of Use Rating
Program Upgrade
In response to Section 14(g) of the
Transportation Recall Enhancement,
Accountability and Documentation
(TREAD) Act, NHTSA established a
yearly Ease of Use assessment program
for add-on child restraints. Since the
program was established, the most
notable improvements are ones that
have been made to child restraint
harness designs, labels and manuals. On
February 1, 2008, the agency enhanced
the program by including new rating
features and criteria, adjusting the
scoring systems, and using stars to
display the Ease of Use ratings.
The agency is now considering
additional improvements to the Ease of
Use Program to address added CRS
features that are not currently assessed,
but may have an effect on usability.
Additionally, it may be necessary to
strengthen the current rating criteria
since manufacturers continually make
improvements to their products.
Comments are requested on what
additional CRS features should be
addressed and what aspects of the
22 76 FR 10637 (February 25, 2011) (Docket No.
NHTSA–2010–00062–0001).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
current rating criteria should be
strengthened.
VI. Public Participation
How do I prepare and submit
comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are filed correctly in the
docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long (49 CFR 553.21).
NHTSA established this limit to
encourage you to write your primary
comments in a concise fashion.
However, you may attach necessary
additional documents to your
comments. There is no limit on the
length of the attachments.
Please submit one copy (two copies if
submitting by mail or hand delivery) of
your comments, including the
attachments, to the docket following the
instructions given above under
ADDRESSES. Please note, if you are
submitting comments electronically as a
PDF (Adobe) file, we ask that the
documents submitted be scanned using
an Optical Character Recognition (OCR)
process, thus allowing the agency to
search and copy certain portions of your
submissions.
How do I submit confidential business
information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Office of
the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the
address given above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, you
may submit a copy (two copies if
submitting by mail or hand delivery),
from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business
information, to the docket by one of the
methods given above under ADDRESSES.
When you send a comment containing
information claimed to be confidential
business information, you should
include a cover letter setting forth the
information specified in NHTSA’s
confidential business information
regulation (49 CFR Part 512).
Will the agency consider late
comments?
NHTSA will consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent
possible, the agency will also consider
comments received after that date.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may read the comments received
at the address given above under
ADDRESSES. The hours of the docket are
indicated above in the same location.
You may also see the comments on the
Internet, identified by the docket
number at the heading of this notice, at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Please note that, even after the
comment closing date, NHTSA will
continue to file relevant information in
the docket as it becomes available.
Further, some people may submit late
comments. Accordingly, the agency
recommends that you periodically
check the docket for new material.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Issued on: March 28, 2013.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2013–07766 Filed 4–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 130221153–3153–01]
RIN 0648–BC78
Enhanced Document Requirements To
Support Use of the Dolphin Safe Label
on Tuna Products
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to revise
regulations under the Dolphin
Protection Consumer Information Act
(DPCIA) to enhance the requirements for
documentation to support labels on tuna
products that represent the product as
dolphin-safe. This proposed rule would
modify the requirements for the
certifications that must accompany the
Fisheries Certificate of Origin (FCO);
change storage requirements related to
dolphin-safe and non-dolphin-safe tuna
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
on board fishing vessels; create new
requirements for processors, other than
tuna canners, of tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe; and modify the reporting
requirements associated with tracking
domestic tuna canning and processing
operations. This proposed rule is
intended to better ensure dolphin-safe
labels comply with the requirements of
the DPCIA and to ensure that the United
States satisfies its obligations as a
member of the World Trade
Organization (WTO).
Comments must be submitted in
writing by May 6, 2013.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2013–0016,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130016, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, NMFS Southwest
Regional Office, 501 W. Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
• Fax: 562–980–4047, Attn: Rodney
R. McInnis.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to the NMFS
Southwest Region (SWR) and by email
to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or
faxed to (202) 395–7285.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Jacobson, NMFS SWR, 562–
980–4035.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
Background
Enacted in 1990, the DPCIA (16 U.S.C.
1385) established a dolphin-safe
labeling standard for tuna products. The
law addressed a Congressional finding
that ‘‘consumers would like to know if
the tuna they purchase is falsely labeled
as to the effect of the harvesting of the
tuna on dolphins.’’ The DPCIA sets out
minimum criteria for when tuna
product producers, importers, exporters,
distributors, or sellers may label their
product dolphin-safe or with any other
similar term or symbol suggesting that
the tuna contained in the product were
harvested using a method of fishing that
is not harmful to dolphins. Specifically,
the DPCIA prohibits producers,
importers, exporters, distributers, or
sellers from labeling as dolphin-safe any
tuna product that was harvested: (i) ‘‘on
the high seas by a vessel engaged in
driftnet fishing,’’ (ii) in the eastern
tropical Pacific Ocean (ETP) by purse
seine vessels with a carrying capacity of
400 short tons or greater unless
accompanied by a captain’s statement
and observer’s statement that no
dolphins were intentionally encircled
during the trip and no dolphins were
killed or seriously injured during the
set, or (iii) outside the ETP by purse
seine vessels unless the captain certifies
that no dolphins were intentionally
encircled during the trip (16 U.S.C.
1385(d)(1)). The ETP is defined as the
waters of the Pacific Ocean bounded by
40E N. latitude, 40E S. latitude, 160E W.
longitude and the coastlines of North,
Central and South America (50 CFR
216.3).
In addition to the above, if the
Secretary of Commerce identifies a
purse seine fishery that has a regular
and significant association between
dolphins and tuna similar to the ETP,
then tuna products containing tuna
harvested in such a fishery may not be
labeled dolphin-safe, unless a captain
and observer certify that no dolphins
were killed or seriously injured in the
sets in which the tuna were harvested
(16 U.S.C. 1385(d)(1)(B)(i)).
Furthermore, if the Secretary of
Commerce identifies any other fishery
that has a regular and significant
association between dolphins and tuna,
then tuna products containing tuna
harvested in such a fishery may not be
labeled dolphin-safe, unless a captain
and observer (if NOAA Fisheries
determines that an observer statement
would be ‘‘necessary’’) certify that no
dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets or other gear
deployments in which the tuna were
harvested (16 U.S.C. 1385(d)(1)(D)).
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20605
The minimum standards described
above apply to any tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe. The DPCIA further directs
the Secretary of Commerce to develop
an ‘‘official mark’’ that may be used to
label tuna products as dolphin safe
under 16 U.S.C. 1385(d)(3)(A), and
requires that tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe using other than the
official mark may be used only if the
tuna were harvested during a set or
other gear deployment in which no
dolphin was killed or seriously injured,
regardless of the area of harvest or the
type of gear used (16 U.S.C.
1385(d)(3)(C)(i)). Finally, NOAA
Fisheries has broad authority to issue
regulations to implement the DPCIA,
including specifically the authority to
establish a domestic tracking and
verification program that provides for
the tracking of tuna labeled dolphin-safe
(whether using the official mark or any
other mark) and to adjust such
regulations as appropriate to implement
an international tracking and
verification program (16 U.S.C. 1385(f)).
Under current regulations, an FCO is
required to accompany each importation
of tuna product and is required to be
submitted to NOAA Fisheries. The
dolphin-safe status of the importation is
declared on the FCO by the exporter and
is endorsed by the importer. For tuna
caught by ETP large purse seine vessels,
current regulations require, as a
condition of labeling tuna dolphin-safe,
that the importer attach a certification
from the captain and an observer on
board the vessel that no dolphins were
killed or seriously injured in the sets in
which the tuna were caught, and that no
purse seine net was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle
dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught. For vessels
using purse seine gear outside the ETP,
current regulations require, as a
condition of labeling tuna dolphin-safe,
that the importer attach a certification
from the captain that no purse seine net
was intentionally deployed on or used
to encircle dolphins during the fishing
trip in which the tuna were caught. Also
under current regulations, domestic
tuna canners are required to submit to
NOAA Fisheries monthly reports, which
include the pertinent information found
on an FCO, as well as additional vessel
and transshipment information not
found on an FCO, for all tuna received
at the plant.
In 2008, Mexico initiated WTO
dispute settlement proceedings
challenging the U.S. dolphin-safe
labeling scheme as a violation of
provisions of the WTO’s General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994
and Agreement on Technical Barriers to
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
20606
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Trade (TBT Agreement). Mexico
challenged three U.S. measures: the
DPCIA, Department of Commerce
DPCIA regulations (50 CFR 216.91
through 216.92), and a federal court
decision (Earth Island Institute v.
Hogarth, 494 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2007)).
The challenged measures establish
conditions under which tuna products
may voluntarily be labeled dolphin-safe.
On June 13, 2012, the WTO Dispute
Settlement Body (DSB) adopted the
WTO panel and Appellate Body reports
finding that the U.S. dolphin-safe
labeling scheme (including the
regulations that would be amended in
this proposed rule) accords less
favorable treatment to Mexican tuna
products and therefore is inconsistent
with Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement.
This conclusion was based on a finding
that the U.S. measures did not set
conditions for use of the label in a way
that reflects the risks faced by dolphins
in different oceans.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Action
This proposed rule would revise
regulations at 50 CFR 216.91, to impose
additional requirements regarding
certifications to support the labeling of
tuna products as dolphin-safe. This
proposed rule would better ensure
dolphin-safe labels comply with the
requirements of the DPCIA, and would
ensure conformity with U.S. WTO
obligations by addressing the WTO
Dispute Settlement Body’s ruling. If
adopted, this rule would require, as a
condition of labeling tuna dolphin-safe,
that the captain of the vessel and, where
applicable, either a qualified and
authorized observer or an authorized
representative of a nation participating
in the observer program on board the
vessel, certify that no dolphins were
killed or seriously injured in the sets or
other gear deployments in which the
tuna were caught. In addition, for
vessels using purse seine gear outside
the ETP, the rule would require, if
applicable, the observer or an
authorized representative of a nation
participating in the observer program to
certify that no purse seine net was
intentionally deployed on or used to
encircle dolphins during the fishing trip
in which the tuna were caught as a
condition of labeling the tuna dolphinsafe.
This proposed rule would also revise
regulations at 50 CFR 216.93 to change
storage requirements related to dolphinsafe and non-dolphin-safe tuna on board
fishing vessels; to create requirements
for processors, other than tuna canners,
of tuna product labeled dolphin-safe;
and to include modifications to a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
monthly receipts report that domestic
tuna canners currently submit to NMFS.
Dolphin-safe Labeling Standards
Under current regulations at 50 CFR
216.91(a), statements and/or
certifications must accompany any tuna
product labeled dolphin-safe that
includes tuna harvested: by a large
purse seine vessel (greater than 400
short tons (362.8 metric tons (mt))
carrying capacity) in the ETP; by a purse
seine vessel of any size outside of the
ETP; or in any other fishery, identified
by the Secretary of Commerce, where
there is regular and significant mortality
or serious injury of dolphins.
The Secretary of Commerce has not
determined, to date, that any other
fishery has a regular and significant
association between dolphins and tunas
similar to the association between
dolphins and tuna in the ETP, or regular
and significant mortality or serious
injury of dolphins, and therefore NOAA
Fisheries has not imposed the
additional requirements for captain’s
and (where applicable) observer’s
statements described in paragraphs
(d)(1)(B)(i) and (d)(1)(D) of the DPCIA.
Furthermore, while paragraph
(d)(3)(C)(i) of the DCPIA forbids the use
of alternative dolphin-safe marks on any
tuna product harvested during a gear
deployment in which dolphins were
killed or seriously injured, current
regulations do not require a captain’s or
observer’s statement to document that
no such mortality or injury has
occurred. The proposed changes are
intended to better ensure consistency
with the requirements of the DPCIA,
and to ensure conformity with U.S.
WTO obligations. This rule is issued
under the Secretary’s broad regulatory
authority to implement the DPCIA and
particularly to implement a domestic
tuna tracking and verification program
(see paragraph (f) of the DPCIA, 16
U.S.C. § 1385(f)) to ensure that tuna is
not falsely labeled as to the effect of
harvesting of the tuna on dolphins. It
would expand the current requirement
that captains, and in some cases
observers, provide a statement that ‘‘no
dolphins were killed or seriously
injured’’ for all tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe, not just tuna harvested by
large purse seine in the ETP. NMFS
proposes to revise 50 CFR 216.91(a) to
require that for all tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe (other than that harvested
by large ETP purse seine vessels or
vessels engaged in large-scale driftnet
fishing, which would remain subject to
current requirements): (1) The captain of
the vessel harvesting tuna provide a
statement that no dolphins were killed
or seriously injured in the sets or other
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
gear deployments in which the tuna
were caught; (2) an authorized and
qualified observer on board the vessel (if
any) or an authorized representative of
the nation participating in an authorized
and qualified observer program (if any)
provide a statement that no dolphins
were killed or seriously injured in the
sets or other gear deployments in which
the tuna were caught and, if applicable,
no purse seine net was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle
dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught; and (3)
tuna caught in sets or other gear
deployments designated as dolphin-safe
be stored separately from tuna caught in
non-dolphin-safe sets or other gear
deployments from the time of capture
through unloading.
NMFS will identify fisheries that are
monitored by on-board observers
participating in a national or
international observer program that the
Assistant Administrator, NOAA, has
determined are qualified and authorized
by the program authority to certify that
no dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets or other gear
deployments in which the tuna were
caught. The Assistant Administrator’s
determination will be announced
publicly through a notice published in
the Federal Register and also on the
NMFS Southwest Region Web site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov. Only tuna
harvested on fishing trips beginning
after the effective date of the final rule
will be subject to the new requirements
for captain and, where applicable,
observer statements. These new
information collections (i.e., all the new
statements and certifications), will
become effective only after review and
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
Any producer, importer, exporter,
distributor, or seller of tuna product
labeled under these proposed
regulations would be subject to
enforcement under section 5 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act for
including a dolphin-safe label on tuna
product in the United States that fails to
meet the standards for use of a dolphinsafe label as set forth in paragraph (d)
of the DPCIA, 16 USC § 1385(d).
Furthermore, the violations of the
requirements under this proposed rule
are enforceable under 18 U.S.C. 1001(a),
which authorizes the imposition of
penalties including fines or
imprisonment for anyone who
knowingly and willfully (1) falsifies,
conceals, or covers up by any trick,
scheme, or device a material fact; (2)
makes any materially false, fictitious, or
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
fraudulent statement or representation;
or (3) makes or uses any false writing or
document knowing the same to contain
any materially false, fictitious, or
fraudulent statement or entry.
Tracking and Verification Program
NMFS proposes to revise the
regulations at 50 CFR 216.93 governing
the tuna tracking and verification as it
relates to U.S. citizens and U.S. vessels.
First, this rule would remove the words
‘‘purse seine’’ from the introductory
paragraph of 50 CFR 216.93, because all
tuna included, or intended to be
included, in tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe are subject to the
requirements, not only tuna harvested
using the purse seine fishing method.
NMFS also proposes adding a
paragraph heading to 50 CFR
216.93(c)(1) to clarify that proposed
subparagraphs under 50 CFR
216.93(c)(1) pertain to ETP large purse
seine vessels. NMFS proposes to
redesignate 50 CFR 216.93(c)(1) as
paragraph 216.93(c)(1)(i), and to revise
the paragraph by removing the words
‘‘ETP fishing trips’’ and inserting
instead the phrase ‘‘fishing trips, any
part of which included fishing in the
ETP,’’ to clarify the meaning of ‘‘ETP
fishing trip.’’ This rule would require
that tuna product labeled dolphin-safe
in the United States that was harvested
by purse seine gear anywhere (other
than large purse seine vessels in the
ETP, which would remain subject to the
current regulations), be stored
separately from tuna caught in nondolphin-safe sets from the time of
capture through unloading. Under this
rule, tuna caught in sets where a
dolphin died or was seriously injured
must be stored in a well designated for
that trip as non-dolphin-safe by the
captain or, where applicable, by a
qualified and authorized observer under
§ 216.91. Any tuna loaded into a well
previously designated on the trip as
non-dolphin-safe would be considered
non-dolphin-safe tuna. The captain or a
qualified and authorized observer under
§ 216.91 would change the designation
of a dolphin-safe well to non-dolphinsafe if any tuna loaded into the well
were captured in a set in which a
dolphin died or was seriously injured.
If a purse seine vessel has only one
storage well, then the rule would
require the use of netting or other
material to keep dolphin-safe tuna and
non-dolphin-safe tuna physically
separate. NMFS is seeking comments
from the industry on this concept of
physically separating dolphin-safe tuna
and non-dolphin-safe tuna through the
use of netting or other material on purse
seine vessels with only one storage well.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
The proposed rule would require tuna
offloaded to trucks, storage facilities, or
carrier vessels to be loaded or stored in
such a way as to maintain and safeguard
the identification of the dolphin-safe or
non-dolphin-safe designation of the
tuna as it left the fishing vessel. NMFS
does not expect a significant cost
burden increase to operators of trucks,
storage facilities, or carrier vessels in
order to keep dolphin-safe tuna and
non-dolphin-safe tuna separate, as the
industry already uses methods (e.g., the
use of netting, tarps, or separate totes or
storage containers) to keep offloaded
tuna sourced from different suppliers
separate. Revisions to 50 CFR 216.93(c)
are intended to better ensure that
dolphin-safe related requirements are
met.
NMFS proposes to revise the
regulations that pertain to tuna
harvested by vessels other than purse
seine vessels, at 50 CFR 216.93(c)(3).
This rule would require that tuna caught
in sets or other gear deployments
designated as dolphin-safe to be stored
separately from tuna caught in nondolphin-safe sets or other gear
deployments from the time of capture
through unloading. Tuna caught in sets
or other gear deployments where a
dolphin died or was seriously injured
would be considered non-dolphin-safe
tuna, and would be required to be kept
physically separate from the dolphinsafe tuna by using netting, other
material, or separate storage areas. The
rule would require tuna offloaded to
trucks, storage facilities, or carrier
vessels to be loaded or stored in such a
way as to maintain and safeguard the
identification of the dolphin-safe or
non-dolphin-safe designation of the
tuna as it left the fishing vessel. The
new requirements in 50 CFR
216.93(c)(3) are intended to better
ensure that dolphin-safe related
requirements are met.
NMFS proposes to remove the words
‘‘ETP caught’’ from 50 CFR 216.93(d)(1),
so as not to limit tracking of domestic
cannery operations to only ETP
harvested tuna and tuna products.
Other proposed revisions include
modifications to the monthly receipts
report domestic canners submit under
50 CFR 216.93(d)(2)(i). This proposed
rule would require the report to: (1)
declare whether the tuna is eligible to be
labeled dolphin-safe; (2) include the
gear type of the harvesting method; and
(3) enclose certifications required by 50
CFR 216.91 when the processor
indicates the tuna is eligible to be
labeled dolphin-safe under 50 CFR
216.91. These revisions are subject to
review and approval by OMB under the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20607
NMFS also proposes to add
requirements at 50 CFR 216.93(e) for
tuna processors, other than tuna
canners, to submit to NOAA monthly
receipt reports: (1) Declaring whether
the tuna is eligible to be labeled
dolphin-safe; (2) identifying the gear
type of the harvesting method; and (3)
enclosing certifications required by 50
CFR 216.91 when the processor
indicates the tuna is eligible to be
labeled dolphin-safe under 50 CFR
216.91. These provisions would impose
similar requirements on both tuna
canners and other tuna processors. As
with the new reporting requirements for
tuna canners, these revisions are subject
to review and approval by OMB under
the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. As a
result of the insertion of this new
paragraph, existing paragraphs at 50
CFR 216.93(e), (f), and (g) are proposed
to be redesignated to paragraphs 50 CFR
216.93(f), (g), and (h).
Fisheries Certificates of Origin and
Associated Certifications
To import tuna, tuna products, and
certain other fish products into the
United States, current regulations at 50
CFR 216.24(f)(3)(i) and (ii) require FCOs
and associated certifications to be
submitted to both U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP; Department of
Homeland Security) and NMFS
Southwest Region. The proposed
changes in the dolphin-safe
documentation requirements described
above would also require NOAA to
revise the FCOs. Specifically, the FCOs
would direct importers to attach a
captain’s statement and, where
applicable, a statement either by the
observer or an authorized representative
of a nation participating in the observer
program, using information from the
observer, certifying that no dolphins
were killed or seriously injured in the
sets or other gear deployments in which
the tuna were caught, for: (1) Tuna not
harvested with a purse seine net; (2)
tuna harvested with a purse seine net
outside the ETP; and (3) tuna harvested
in the ETP by a purse seine vessel
having a carrying capacity of 400 short
tons (362.8 mt) or less. The revisions to
the FCOs are subject to review and
approval by OMB under the PRA, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule
is consistent with the DPCIA and other
applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for the purposes of E.O.
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
20608
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
12866 by the OMB Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605, part of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5
U.S.C. chapter 5), the Chief Counsel for
Regulation of the Department of
Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed
rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The basis for this certification is
presented in the following paragraphs.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Description of Affected Entities and
Small Entities
For purposes of the RFA, we assess
the effects of the proposed regulations to
three classes of entities: (1) Owners of
U.S. tuna fishing vessels where the
harvested tuna is labeled dolphin-safe
and is sold in the United States; (2) U.S.
tuna processors; and (3) importers of
tuna and tuna products labeled dolphinsafe. We used the SBA’s size standards
established at 13 CFR part 121 to define
the affected small entities: fishing
vessels, tuna processors, and tuna
importers. Using those standards,
fishing vessels with less than $4 million
in average annual receipts, tuna
processors with fewer than 500
employees, and importers with fewer
than 100 employees are considered
small entities.
U.S. purse seine vessels that fish for
tuna destined to become tuna product
are divided into two size groups: (1)
Vessels greater than 400 st (362.8 mt)
carrying capacity (‘‘large’’ vessels); and
(2) vessels of 400 st (362.8 mt) carrying
capacity or less (‘‘small’’ vessels). Large
vessels typically exceed $4 million in
annual receipts, whereas small vessels
have less than $4 million in annual
receipts and would be considered small
entities. From 2011—2012, the U.S.
purse seine fleet, all of which fished in
the Pacific Ocean, averaged 39 large
vessels and 7 small vessels. About 1,930
U.S. non-purse seine commercial fishing
vessels are authorized to fish for tuna in
the Pacific Ocean per year, including:
(1) vessels under Pacific Highly
Migratory Species vessel permits (about
1,766 vessels); and (2) vessels based in
Hawaii and the U.S. Pacific Islands,
under High Seas Fishing Compliance
Act permits (about 175 vessels). All of
these are considered small entities in
this analysis, and have less than $4
million in annual receipts.
There are 19 tuna canning
manufacturers in the United States. Of
these, 16 are considered small
businesses, because they have fewer
than 500 employees.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
NMFS is unaware of any domestic
tuna processor, other than canning
operations, that labels tuna product as
dolphin-safe.
There are an estimated 430 U.S.
importers of tuna and tuna products per
year. Of these, about 380 importers are
considered small businesses, because
they have fewer than 100 employees.
Impacts on Affected Entities
The proposed rule, if implemented,
would apply additional documentation
requirements to all three classes of
affected entities; none of these reporting
requirements would result in a
significant economic effect. The time
needed to gather and submit a written
statement by the captain of the
harvesting vessel and by the observer on
board the vessel or by an authorized
representative, if applicable, would be
minimal (about 5 minutes each). An
additional cost to provide the written
statements would be about $0.10 for
each one page written statement.
Moreover, any additional costs to any
entity resulting from this rule will be
small (e.g. the cost associated with two
pieces of netting or tarps, etc. for use in
storage separation). Accordingly, as it
pertains to the RFA, this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains two
collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the PRA under control numbers
0648–0335 and 0648–0387. Revision of
OMB control number 0648–0335, titled
‘‘Fisheries Certificate of Origin,’’ if
approved, modifies the dolphin-safe
status section of the FCO. The labor and
cost burden due to this proposed rule on
control number 0648–0335 is estimated
to affect approximately 13,000
responses annually from 430
respondents. The cost and labor burdens
are estimated to increase by $0.30 and
5 minutes respectively, per response.
Revision of OMB control number 0648–
0387, titled ‘‘International Dolphin
Conservation Program,’’ if approved,
requires information from tuna canners
and tuna processors, other than canners,
about the eligibility of tuna to be labeled
dolphin-safe; the gear type used to
harvest the tuna; and will contain
certifications required by 50 CFR
216.91. The labor and cost burden due
to this proposed rule on control number
0648–0387 is estimated to affect
approximately 72 responses annually
from 19 respondents. The cost and labor
burdens are estimated to increase by
$0.50 and 5 minutes respectively, per
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
response. These collections have been
submitted to OMB for approval. Public
reporting burden estimates include the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection-ofinformation is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection-of-information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection-of-information to NMFS
Southwest Region at the ADDRESSES
above, and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
to (202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with a collection-of-information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection-of-information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 216
Commercial fisheries, Food labeling,
Imports, Marine mammals, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Seafood.
Dated: April 2, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 216, subpart H is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 216—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE TAKING AND
IMPORTING OF MARINE MAMMALS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 216, subpart H, continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1385
2. In § 216.91, revise paragraphs
(a)(2)(ii) and (a)(4), and add a new
paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows:
■
§ 216.91
Dolphin-safe labeling standards.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(ii) In any other fishery unless the
products are accompanied as described
in § 216.93(d), (e), or (f), as appropriate,
by:
(A) A written statement executed by
the Captain of the vessel certifying that
no purse seine net was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle
dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught, and that no
dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets in which the tuna
were caught; and
(B) Where the Assistant Administrator
has determined that observers
participating in a national or
international observer program are
qualified and authorized to certify that
no purse seine net was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle
dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught, and that no
dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets in which the tuna
were caught, and where such an
observer is on board the vessel, a
written statement executed by the
observer, or by an authorized
representative of a nation participating
in the observer program based on
information from the observer,
certifying that no purse seine net was
intentionally deployed on or used to
encircle dolphins during the fishing trip
in which the tuna were caught and that
no dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets in which the tuna
were caught. Any determination by the
Assistant Administrator shall be
announced in a notice published in the
Federal Register. Determinations under
this paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(B) will also be
publicized on the Web site of the NMFS
Southwest Region (https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/).
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Other fisheries. By a vessel in a
fishery other than one described in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this
section unless such product is
accompanied as described in
§ 216.93(d), (e), or (f), as appropriate, by:
(i) A written statement executed by
the Captain of the vessel certifying that
no dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets or other gear
deployments in which the tuna were
caught;
(ii) Where the Assistant Administrator
has determined that observers
participating in a national or
international observer program are
qualified and authorized to certify that
no dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets or other gear
deployments in which the tuna were
caught, and where such an observer is
on board the vessel, a written statement
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
executed by the observer, or by an
authorized representative of a nation
participating in the observer program
based on information from the observer,
certifying that no dolphins were killed
or seriously injured in the sets or other
gear deployments in which the tuna
were caught. Any determination by the
Assistant Administrator shall be
announced in a notice published in the
Federal Register. Determinations under
this subparagraph will also be
publicized on the Web site of the NMFS
Southwest Region (https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/); and
(iii) In addition to the requirements of
paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and (ii) of this
section, in any other fishery that is
identified by the Assistant
Administrator as having a regular and
significant mortality or serious injury of
dolphins, a written statement executed
by an observer participating in a
national or international program
acceptable to the Assistant
Administrator, that no dolphins were
killed or seriously injured in the sets or
other gear deployments in which the
tuna were caught, provided that the
Assistant Administrator determines that
such an observer statement is necessary.
(5) All fisheries. On a fishing trip
during which any dolphin was killed or
seriously injured, unless the tuna
labeled dolphin-safe was caught in a set
or other gear deployment was stored
separately from tuna caught in nondolphin-safe sets or other gear
deployments by the use of netting, other
material, or separate storage areas from
the time of capture through unloading.
If a purse seine vessel has more than
one well used to store tuna, all tuna
inside a well shall be considered nondolphin-safe, if at any time nondolphin-safe tuna is loaded into the
well, regardless of the use of netting or
other material inside the well.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 216.93 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 216.93 Tracking and verification
program.
The Administrator, Southwest Region,
has established a national tracking and
verification program to accurately
document the dolphin-safe condition of
tuna, under the standards set forth in
§§ 216.91 and 216.92. The tracking
program includes procedures and
reports for use when importing tuna
into the United States and during U.S.
fishing, processing, and marketing in
the United States and abroad.
Verification of tracking system
operations is attained through the
establishment of audit and document
review requirements. The tracking
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20609
program is consistent with the
international tuna tracking and
verification program adopted by the
Parties to the Agreement on the IDCP.
(a) Tuna tracking forms. Whenever a
U.S. flag tuna purse seine vessel of
greater than 400 st (362.8 mt) carrying
capacity fishes in the ETP, IDCP
approved Tuna Tracking Forms (TTFs),
bearing a unique number assigned to
that trip, are used by the observer to
record every set made during that trip.
One TTF is used to record dolphin-safe
sets and a second TTF is used to record
non-dolphin-safe sets. The information
entered on the TTFs following each set
includes the date, well number, weights
by species composition, estimated tons
loaded, and additional notes, if any. The
observer and the vessel engineer initial
the entry as soon as possible following
each set, and the vessel captain and
observer review and sign both TTFs at
the end of the fishing trip certifying that
the information on the forms is accurate.
TTFs are confidential official
documents of the IDCP, consistent with
Article XVIII of the Agreement on the
IDCP, and the Agreement on the IDCP
Rules of Confidentiality.
(b) Dolphin-safe certification. Upon
request, the Office of the Administrator,
Southwest Region, will provide written
certification that tuna harvested by U.S.
purse seine vessels greater than 400 st
(362.8 mt) carrying capacity is dolphinsafe, but only if NMFS’ review of the
TTFs for the subject trip shows that the
tuna for which the certification is
requested is dolphin-safe under the
requirements of the Agreement on the
IDCP and U.S. law.
(c) Tracking fishing operations. (1)
ETP large purse seine vessel. In the ETP
by a purse seine vessel of greater than
400 st (362.8 mt) carrying capacity:
(i) During fishing trips, any part of
which included fishing in the ETP, by
purse seine vessels greater than 400 st
(362.8 mt) carrying capacity, tuna
caught in sets designated as dolphinsafe by the vessel observer must be
stored separately from tuna caught in
non-dolphin-safe sets from the time of
capture through unloading. Vessel
personnel will decide into which wells
tuna will be loaded. The observer will
initially designate whether each set is
dolphin-safe or not, based on his/her
observation of the set. The observer will
initially identify a vessel fish well as
dolphin-safe if the first tuna loaded into
the well during a trip was captured in
a set in which no dolphin died or was
seriously injured. The observer will
initially identify a vessel fish well as
non-dolphin-safe if the first tuna loaded
into the well during a trip was captured
in a set in which a dolphin died or was
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
20610
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
seriously injured. Any tuna loaded into
a well previously designated nondolphin-safe is considered non-dolphinsafe tuna. The observer will change the
designation of a dolphin-safe well to
non-dolphin-safe if any tuna are loaded
into the well that were captured in a set
in which a dolphin died or was
seriously injured.
(ii) The captain, managing owner, or
vessel agent of a U.S. purse seine vessel
greater than 400 st (362.8 mt) returning
to port from a trip, any part of which
included fishing in the ETP, must
provide at least 48 hours’ notice of the
vessel’s intended place of landing,
arrival time, and schedule of unloading
to the Administrator, Southwest Region.
(iii) If the trip terminates when the
vessel enters port to unload part or all
of its catch, new TTFs will be assigned
to the new trip, and any information
concerning tuna retained on the vessel
will be recorded as the first entry on the
TTFs for the new trip. If the trip is not
terminated following a partial
unloading, the vessel will retain the
original TTFs and submit a copy of
those TTFs to the Administrator,
Southwest Region, within 5 working
days. In either case, the species and
amount unloaded will be noted on the
respective originals.
(iv) Tuna offloaded to trucks, storage
facilities, or carrier vessels must be
loaded or stored in such a way as to
maintain and safeguard the
identification of the dolphin-safe or
non-dolphin-safe designation of the
tuna as it left the fishing vessel.
(v) The handling of TTFs and the
tracking and verification of tuna caught
in the Convention Area by a U.S. purse
seine vessel greater than 400 st (362.8
mt) carrying capacity shall be conducted
consistent with the international tuna
tracking and verification program
adopted by the Parties to the Agreement
on the IDCP.
(2) Purse seine vessel other than ETP
large purse seine vessel. This paragraph
(c)(2) applies to tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe that includes tuna
harvested in the ETP by a purse seine
vessel of 400 st (362.8 mt) or less
carrying capacity or by a purse seine
vessel outside the ETP of any carrying
capacity.
(i) Tuna caught in sets designated as
dolphin-safe must be stored separately
from tuna caught in non-dolphin-safe
sets from the time of capture through
unloading. Tuna caught in sets where a
dolphin died or was seriously injured
must be stored in a well designated as
non-dolphin-safe by the captain or,
where applicable, by a qualified and
authorized observer under § 216.91. Any
tuna loaded into a well previously
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
designated non-dolphin-safe is
considered non-dolphin-safe tuna. The
captain or, where applicable, a qualified
and authorized observer under § 216.91,
will change the designation of a
dolphin-safe well to non-dolphin-safe if
any tuna are loaded into the well that
were captured in a set in which a
dolphin died or was seriously injured.
If a purse seine vessel has only one well
used to store tuna, dolphin-safe tuna
must be kept physically separate from
non-dolphin-safe tuna by using netting
or other material. If a purse seine vessel
has more than one well used to store
tuna, all tuna inside a well shall be
considered non-dolphin-safe, if at any
time non-dolphin-safe tuna is loaded
into the well, regardless of the use of
netting or other material inside the well.
(ii) Tuna offloaded to trucks, storage
facilities, or carrier vessels must be
loaded or stored in such a way as to
maintain and safeguard the
identification of the dolphin-safe or
non-dolphin-safe designation of the
tuna as it left the fishing vessel.
(3) Other vessels. This paragraph
(c)(3) applies to tuna product labeled
dolphin-safe that includes tuna
harvested by a vessel other than ones
described in paragraphs (c)(1) or (c)(2)
of this section:
(i) Tuna caught in sets or other gear
deployments designated as dolphin-safe
must be stored separately from tuna
caught in non-dolphin-safe sets or other
gear deployments from the time of
capture through unloading. Dolphinsafe tuna must be kept physically
separate from non-dolphin-safe tuna by
using netting, other material, or separate
storage areas. The captain or, where
applicable, a qualified and authorized
observer under § 216.91, must designate
the storage areas for dolphin-safe and
non-dolphin-safe tuna.
(ii) Tuna offloaded to trucks, storage
facilities, or carrier vessels must be
loaded or stored in such a way as to
maintain and safeguard the
identification of the dolphin-safe or
non-dolphin-safe designation of the
tuna as it left the fishing vessel.
(d) Tracking cannery operations. (1)
Whenever a U.S. tuna canning company
in the 50 states, Puerto Rico, or
American Samoa receives a domestic or
imported shipment of tuna for
processing, a NMFS representative may
be present to monitor delivery and
verify that dolphin-safe and nondolphin-safe tuna are clearly identified
and remain segregated. Such
inspections may be scheduled or
unscheduled, and canners must allow
the NMFS representative access to all
areas and records.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) Tuna processors must submit a
report to the Administrator, Southwest
Region, of all tuna received at their
processing facilities in each calendar
month whether or not the tuna is
actually canned or stored during that
month. Monthly cannery receipt reports
must be submitted electronically or by
mail before the last day of the month
following the month being reported.
Monthly reports must contain the
following information:
(i) Domestic receipts: whether the
tuna is eligible to be labeled dolphinsafe under § 216.91, species, condition
(round, loin, dressed, gilled and gutted,
other), weight in short tons to the fourth
decimal, ocean area of capture (ETP,
western Pacific, Indian, eastern and
western Atlantic, other), catcher vessel,
gear type, trip dates, carrier name,
unloading dates, and location of
unloading. Where the processor
indicates the tuna is eligible to be
labeled dolphin-safe under § 216.91, it
must enclose the certifications required
by that section.
(ii) Import receipts: In addition to the
information required in paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section, a copy of the
FCO for each imported receipt must be
provided.
(3) Tuna processors must report on a
monthly basis the amounts of ETPcaught tuna that were immediately
utilized upon receipt or removed from
cold storage. This report may be
submitted in conjunction with the
monthly report required in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section. This report must
contain:
(i) The date of removal from cold
storage or disposition;
(ii) Storage container or lot identifier
number(s) and dolphin-safe or nondolphin-safe designation of each
container or lot; and
(iii) Details of the disposition of fish
(for example, canning, sale, rejection,
etc.).
(4) During canning activities, nondolphin-safe tuna may not be mixed in
any manner or at any time during
processing with any dolphin-safe tuna
or tuna products and may not share the
same storage containers, cookers,
conveyers, tables, or other canning and
labeling machinery.
(e) Tracking processor operations
other than cannery operations. U.S.
tuna processors other than cannery
operations engaged in processing tuna
products, including frozen, dried, or
smoked tuna products, must submit a
report to the Administrator, Southwest
Region that includes the information set
out in paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of
this section on a monthly basis for all
tuna received at their processing
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Proposed Rules
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
facilities that will be included in any
tuna product labeled dolphin-safe.
(f) Tracking imports. All tuna
products, except fresh tuna, that are
imported into the United States must be
accompanied as described in
§ 216.24(f)(3) by a properly certified
FCO as required by § 216.24(f)(2). For
tuna tracking purposes, copies of FCOs
and associated certifications must be
submitted by the importer of record to
the Administrator, Southwest Region,
within 10 calendar days of the
shipment’s entry into the commerce of
the United States as required by
§ 216.24(f)(3)(ii).
(g) Verification requirements. (1)
Record maintenance. Any exporter,
transshipper, importer, processor, or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
wholesaler/distributor of any tuna or
tuna products must maintain records
related to that tuna for at least 2 years.
These records include, but are not
limited to: FCOs and required
certifications, any reports required in
paragraphs (a), (b), (d) and (e) of this
section, invoices, other import
documents, and trip reports.
(2) Record submission. Within 10
calendar days of receiving a shipment of
tuna or tuna products, any exporter,
transshipper, importer, processor, or
wholesaler/distributor of tuna or tuna
products must submit to the
Administrator, Southwest Region, all
corresponding FCOs and required
certifications for those tuna or tuna
products.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
20611
(3) Audits and spot checks. Upon
request of the Administrator, Southwest
Region, any exporter, transshipper,
importer, processor, or wholesaler/
distributor of tuna or tuna products
must provide the Administrator,
Southwest Region, timely access to all
pertinent records and facilities to allow
for audits and spot-checks on caught,
landed, stored, and processed tuna.
(h) Confidentiality of proprietary
information. Information submitted to
the Assistant Administrator under this
section will be treated as confidential in
accordance with NOAA Administrative
Order 216–100 ‘‘Protection of
Confidential Fisheries Statistics.’’
[FR Doc. 2013–07990 Filed 4–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20604-20611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07990]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 130221153-3153-01]
RIN 0648-BC78
Enhanced Document Requirements To Support Use of the Dolphin Safe
Label on Tuna Products
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to revise regulations under the Dolphin
Protection Consumer Information Act (DPCIA) to enhance the requirements
for documentation to support labels on tuna products that represent the
product as dolphin-safe. This proposed rule would modify the
requirements for the certifications that must accompany the Fisheries
Certificate of Origin (FCO); change storage requirements related to
dolphin-safe and non-dolphin-safe tuna
[[Page 20605]]
on board fishing vessels; create new requirements for processors, other
than tuna canners, of tuna product labeled dolphin-safe; and modify the
reporting requirements associated with tracking domestic tuna canning
and processing operations. This proposed rule is intended to better
ensure dolphin-safe labels comply with the requirements of the DPCIA
and to ensure that the United States satisfies its obligations as a
member of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by May 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2013-0016,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0016, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Rodney R. McInnis,
Regional Administrator, NMFS Southwest Regional Office, 501 W. Ocean
Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
Fax: 562-980-4047, Attn: Rodney R. McInnis.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to the NMFS Southwest Region (SWR) and
by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or faxed to (202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Jacobson, NMFS SWR, 562-980-
4035.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Enacted in 1990, the DPCIA (16 U.S.C. 1385) established a dolphin-
safe labeling standard for tuna products. The law addressed a
Congressional finding that ``consumers would like to know if the tuna
they purchase is falsely labeled as to the effect of the harvesting of
the tuna on dolphins.'' The DPCIA sets out minimum criteria for when
tuna product producers, importers, exporters, distributors, or sellers
may label their product dolphin-safe or with any other similar term or
symbol suggesting that the tuna contained in the product were harvested
using a method of fishing that is not harmful to dolphins.
Specifically, the DPCIA prohibits producers, importers, exporters,
distributers, or sellers from labeling as dolphin-safe any tuna product
that was harvested: (i) ``on the high seas by a vessel engaged in
driftnet fishing,'' (ii) in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (ETP) by
purse seine vessels with a carrying capacity of 400 short tons or
greater unless accompanied by a captain's statement and observer's
statement that no dolphins were intentionally encircled during the trip
and no dolphins were killed or seriously injured during the set, or
(iii) outside the ETP by purse seine vessels unless the captain
certifies that no dolphins were intentionally encircled during the trip
(16 U.S.C. 1385(d)(1)). The ETP is defined as the waters of the Pacific
Ocean bounded by 40[Egr] N. latitude, 40[Egr] S. latitude, 160[Egr] W.
longitude and the coastlines of North, Central and South America (50
CFR 216.3).
In addition to the above, if the Secretary of Commerce identifies a
purse seine fishery that has a regular and significant association
between dolphins and tuna similar to the ETP, then tuna products
containing tuna harvested in such a fishery may not be labeled dolphin-
safe, unless a captain and observer certify that no dolphins were
killed or seriously injured in the sets in which the tuna were
harvested (16 U.S.C. 1385(d)(1)(B)(i)). Furthermore, if the Secretary
of Commerce identifies any other fishery that has a regular and
significant association between dolphins and tuna, then tuna products
containing tuna harvested in such a fishery may not be labeled dolphin-
safe, unless a captain and observer (if NOAA Fisheries determines that
an observer statement would be ``necessary'') certify that no dolphins
were killed or seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments
in which the tuna were harvested (16 U.S.C. 1385(d)(1)(D)).
The minimum standards described above apply to any tuna product
labeled dolphin-safe. The DPCIA further directs the Secretary of
Commerce to develop an ``official mark'' that may be used to label tuna
products as dolphin safe under 16 U.S.C. 1385(d)(3)(A), and requires
that tuna product labeled dolphin-safe using other than the official
mark may be used only if the tuna were harvested during a set or other
gear deployment in which no dolphin was killed or seriously injured,
regardless of the area of harvest or the type of gear used (16 U.S.C.
1385(d)(3)(C)(i)). Finally, NOAA Fisheries has broad authority to issue
regulations to implement the DPCIA, including specifically the
authority to establish a domestic tracking and verification program
that provides for the tracking of tuna labeled dolphin-safe (whether
using the official mark or any other mark) and to adjust such
regulations as appropriate to implement an international tracking and
verification program (16 U.S.C. 1385(f)).
Under current regulations, an FCO is required to accompany each
importation of tuna product and is required to be submitted to NOAA
Fisheries. The dolphin-safe status of the importation is declared on
the FCO by the exporter and is endorsed by the importer. For tuna
caught by ETP large purse seine vessels, current regulations require,
as a condition of labeling tuna dolphin-safe, that the importer attach
a certification from the captain and an observer on board the vessel
that no dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the sets in which
the tuna were caught, and that no purse seine net was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught. For vessels using purse seine gear outside
the ETP, current regulations require, as a condition of labeling tuna
dolphin-safe, that the importer attach a certification from the captain
that no purse seine net was intentionally deployed on or used to
encircle dolphins during the fishing trip in which the tuna were
caught. Also under current regulations, domestic tuna canners are
required to submit to NOAA Fisheries monthly reports, which include the
pertinent information found on an FCO, as well as additional vessel and
transshipment information not found on an FCO, for all tuna received at
the plant.
In 2008, Mexico initiated WTO dispute settlement proceedings
challenging the U.S. dolphin-safe labeling scheme as a violation of
provisions of the WTO's General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and
Agreement on Technical Barriers to
[[Page 20606]]
Trade (TBT Agreement). Mexico challenged three U.S. measures: the
DPCIA, Department of Commerce DPCIA regulations (50 CFR 216.91 through
216.92), and a federal court decision (Earth Island Institute v.
Hogarth, 494 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2007)). The challenged measures
establish conditions under which tuna products may voluntarily be
labeled dolphin-safe. On June 13, 2012, the WTO Dispute Settlement Body
(DSB) adopted the WTO panel and Appellate Body reports finding that the
U.S. dolphin-safe labeling scheme (including the regulations that would
be amended in this proposed rule) accords less favorable treatment to
Mexican tuna products and therefore is inconsistent with Article 2.1 of
the TBT Agreement. This conclusion was based on a finding that the U.S.
measures did not set conditions for use of the label in a way that
reflects the risks faced by dolphins in different oceans.
Proposed Action
This proposed rule would revise regulations at 50 CFR 216.91, to
impose additional requirements regarding certifications to support the
labeling of tuna products as dolphin-safe. This proposed rule would
better ensure dolphin-safe labels comply with the requirements of the
DPCIA, and would ensure conformity with U.S. WTO obligations by
addressing the WTO Dispute Settlement Body's ruling. If adopted, this
rule would require, as a condition of labeling tuna dolphin-safe, that
the captain of the vessel and, where applicable, either a qualified and
authorized observer or an authorized representative of a nation
participating in the observer program on board the vessel, certify that
no dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the sets or other gear
deployments in which the tuna were caught. In addition, for vessels
using purse seine gear outside the ETP, the rule would require, if
applicable, the observer or an authorized representative of a nation
participating in the observer program to certify that no purse seine
net was intentionally deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during
the fishing trip in which the tuna were caught as a condition of
labeling the tuna dolphin-safe.
This proposed rule would also revise regulations at 50 CFR 216.93
to change storage requirements related to dolphin-safe and non-dolphin-
safe tuna on board fishing vessels; to create requirements for
processors, other than tuna canners, of tuna product labeled dolphin-
safe; and to include modifications to a monthly receipts report that
domestic tuna canners currently submit to NMFS.
Dolphin-safe Labeling Standards
Under current regulations at 50 CFR 216.91(a), statements and/or
certifications must accompany any tuna product labeled dolphin-safe
that includes tuna harvested: by a large purse seine vessel (greater
than 400 short tons (362.8 metric tons (mt)) carrying capacity) in the
ETP; by a purse seine vessel of any size outside of the ETP; or in any
other fishery, identified by the Secretary of Commerce, where there is
regular and significant mortality or serious injury of dolphins.
The Secretary of Commerce has not determined, to date, that any
other fishery has a regular and significant association between
dolphins and tunas similar to the association between dolphins and tuna
in the ETP, or regular and significant mortality or serious injury of
dolphins, and therefore NOAA Fisheries has not imposed the additional
requirements for captain's and (where applicable) observer's statements
described in paragraphs (d)(1)(B)(i) and (d)(1)(D) of the DPCIA.
Furthermore, while paragraph (d)(3)(C)(i) of the DCPIA forbids the use
of alternative dolphin-safe marks on any tuna product harvested during
a gear deployment in which dolphins were killed or seriously injured,
current regulations do not require a captain's or observer's statement
to document that no such mortality or injury has occurred. The proposed
changes are intended to better ensure consistency with the requirements
of the DPCIA, and to ensure conformity with U.S. WTO obligations. This
rule is issued under the Secretary's broad regulatory authority to
implement the DPCIA and particularly to implement a domestic tuna
tracking and verification program (see paragraph (f) of the DPCIA, 16
U.S.C. Sec. 1385(f)) to ensure that tuna is not falsely labeled as to
the effect of harvesting of the tuna on dolphins. It would expand the
current requirement that captains, and in some cases observers, provide
a statement that ``no dolphins were killed or seriously injured'' for
all tuna product labeled dolphin-safe, not just tuna harvested by large
purse seine in the ETP. NMFS proposes to revise 50 CFR 216.91(a) to
require that for all tuna product labeled dolphin-safe (other than that
harvested by large ETP purse seine vessels or vessels engaged in large-
scale driftnet fishing, which would remain subject to current
requirements): (1) The captain of the vessel harvesting tuna provide a
statement that no dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the sets
or other gear deployments in which the tuna were caught; (2) an
authorized and qualified observer on board the vessel (if any) or an
authorized representative of the nation participating in an authorized
and qualified observer program (if any) provide a statement that no
dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the sets or other gear
deployments in which the tuna were caught and, if applicable, no purse
seine net was intentionally deployed on or used to encircle dolphins
during the fishing trip in which the tuna were caught; and (3) tuna
caught in sets or other gear deployments designated as dolphin-safe be
stored separately from tuna caught in non-dolphin-safe sets or other
gear deployments from the time of capture through unloading.
NMFS will identify fisheries that are monitored by on-board
observers participating in a national or international observer program
that the Assistant Administrator, NOAA, has determined are qualified
and authorized by the program authority to certify that no dolphins
were killed or seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments
in which the tuna were caught. The Assistant Administrator's
determination will be announced publicly through a notice published in
the Federal Register and also on the NMFS Southwest Region Web site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov. Only tuna harvested on fishing trips
beginning after the effective date of the final rule will be subject to
the new requirements for captain and, where applicable, observer
statements. These new information collections (i.e., all the new
statements and certifications), will become effective only after review
and approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Any producer, importer, exporter, distributor, or seller of tuna
product labeled under these proposed regulations would be subject to
enforcement under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for
including a dolphin-safe label on tuna product in the United States
that fails to meet the standards for use of a dolphin-safe label as set
forth in paragraph (d) of the DPCIA, 16 USC Sec. 1385(d). Furthermore,
the violations of the requirements under this proposed rule are
enforceable under 18 U.S.C. 1001(a), which authorizes the imposition of
penalties including fines or imprisonment for anyone who knowingly and
willfully (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme,
or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious,
or
[[Page 20607]]
fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false
writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.
Tracking and Verification Program
NMFS proposes to revise the regulations at 50 CFR 216.93 governing
the tuna tracking and verification as it relates to U.S. citizens and
U.S. vessels. First, this rule would remove the words ``purse seine''
from the introductory paragraph of 50 CFR 216.93, because all tuna
included, or intended to be included, in tuna product labeled dolphin-
safe are subject to the requirements, not only tuna harvested using the
purse seine fishing method.
NMFS also proposes adding a paragraph heading to 50 CFR
216.93(c)(1) to clarify that proposed subparagraphs under 50 CFR
216.93(c)(1) pertain to ETP large purse seine vessels. NMFS proposes to
redesignate 50 CFR 216.93(c)(1) as paragraph 216.93(c)(1)(i), and to
revise the paragraph by removing the words ``ETP fishing trips'' and
inserting instead the phrase ``fishing trips, any part of which
included fishing in the ETP,'' to clarify the meaning of ``ETP fishing
trip.'' This rule would require that tuna product labeled dolphin-safe
in the United States that was harvested by purse seine gear anywhere
(other than large purse seine vessels in the ETP, which would remain
subject to the current regulations), be stored separately from tuna
caught in non-dolphin-safe sets from the time of capture through
unloading. Under this rule, tuna caught in sets where a dolphin died or
was seriously injured must be stored in a well designated for that trip
as non-dolphin-safe by the captain or, where applicable, by a qualified
and authorized observer under Sec. 216.91. Any tuna loaded into a well
previously designated on the trip as non-dolphin-safe would be
considered non-dolphin-safe tuna. The captain or a qualified and
authorized observer under Sec. 216.91 would change the designation of
a dolphin-safe well to non-dolphin-safe if any tuna loaded into the
well were captured in a set in which a dolphin died or was seriously
injured. If a purse seine vessel has only one storage well, then the
rule would require the use of netting or other material to keep
dolphin-safe tuna and non-dolphin-safe tuna physically separate. NMFS
is seeking comments from the industry on this concept of physically
separating dolphin-safe tuna and non-dolphin-safe tuna through the use
of netting or other material on purse seine vessels with only one
storage well.
The proposed rule would require tuna offloaded to trucks, storage
facilities, or carrier vessels to be loaded or stored in such a way as
to maintain and safeguard the identification of the dolphin-safe or
non-dolphin-safe designation of the tuna as it left the fishing vessel.
NMFS does not expect a significant cost burden increase to operators of
trucks, storage facilities, or carrier vessels in order to keep
dolphin-safe tuna and non-dolphin-safe tuna separate, as the industry
already uses methods (e.g., the use of netting, tarps, or separate
totes or storage containers) to keep offloaded tuna sourced from
different suppliers separate. Revisions to 50 CFR 216.93(c) are
intended to better ensure that dolphin-safe related requirements are
met.
NMFS proposes to revise the regulations that pertain to tuna
harvested by vessels other than purse seine vessels, at 50 CFR
216.93(c)(3). This rule would require that tuna caught in sets or other
gear deployments designated as dolphin-safe to be stored separately
from tuna caught in non-dolphin-safe sets or other gear deployments
from the time of capture through unloading. Tuna caught in sets or
other gear deployments where a dolphin died or was seriously injured
would be considered non-dolphin-safe tuna, and would be required to be
kept physically separate from the dolphin-safe tuna by using netting,
other material, or separate storage areas. The rule would require tuna
offloaded to trucks, storage facilities, or carrier vessels to be
loaded or stored in such a way as to maintain and safeguard the
identification of the dolphin-safe or non-dolphin-safe designation of
the tuna as it left the fishing vessel. The new requirements in 50 CFR
216.93(c)(3) are intended to better ensure that dolphin-safe related
requirements are met.
NMFS proposes to remove the words ``ETP caught'' from 50 CFR
216.93(d)(1), so as not to limit tracking of domestic cannery
operations to only ETP harvested tuna and tuna products.
Other proposed revisions include modifications to the monthly
receipts report domestic canners submit under 50 CFR 216.93(d)(2)(i).
This proposed rule would require the report to: (1) declare whether the
tuna is eligible to be labeled dolphin-safe; (2) include the gear type
of the harvesting method; and (3) enclose certifications required by 50
CFR 216.91 when the processor indicates the tuna is eligible to be
labeled dolphin-safe under 50 CFR 216.91. These revisions are subject
to review and approval by OMB under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
NMFS also proposes to add requirements at 50 CFR 216.93(e) for tuna
processors, other than tuna canners, to submit to NOAA monthly receipt
reports: (1) Declaring whether the tuna is eligible to be labeled
dolphin-safe; (2) identifying the gear type of the harvesting method;
and (3) enclosing certifications required by 50 CFR 216.91 when the
processor indicates the tuna is eligible to be labeled dolphin-safe
under 50 CFR 216.91. These provisions would impose similar requirements
on both tuna canners and other tuna processors. As with the new
reporting requirements for tuna canners, these revisions are subject to
review and approval by OMB under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. As a
result of the insertion of this new paragraph, existing paragraphs at
50 CFR 216.93(e), (f), and (g) are proposed to be redesignated to
paragraphs 50 CFR 216.93(f), (g), and (h).
Fisheries Certificates of Origin and Associated Certifications
To import tuna, tuna products, and certain other fish products into
the United States, current regulations at 50 CFR 216.24(f)(3)(i) and
(ii) require FCOs and associated certifications to be submitted to both
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP; Department of Homeland
Security) and NMFS Southwest Region. The proposed changes in the
dolphin-safe documentation requirements described above would also
require NOAA to revise the FCOs. Specifically, the FCOs would direct
importers to attach a captain's statement and, where applicable, a
statement either by the observer or an authorized representative of a
nation participating in the observer program, using information from
the observer, certifying that no dolphins were killed or seriously
injured in the sets or other gear deployments in which the tuna were
caught, for: (1) Tuna not harvested with a purse seine net; (2) tuna
harvested with a purse seine net outside the ETP; and (3) tuna
harvested in the ETP by a purse seine vessel having a carrying capacity
of 400 short tons (362.8 mt) or less. The revisions to the FCOs are
subject to review and approval by OMB under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed
rule is consistent with the DPCIA and other applicable laws, subject to
further consideration after public comment.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of E.O.
[[Page 20608]]
12866 by the OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605, part of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA; 5 U.S.C. chapter 5), the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if
adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The basis for this certification is presented
in the following paragraphs.
Description of Affected Entities and Small Entities
For purposes of the RFA, we assess the effects of the proposed
regulations to three classes of entities: (1) Owners of U.S. tuna
fishing vessels where the harvested tuna is labeled dolphin-safe and is
sold in the United States; (2) U.S. tuna processors; and (3) importers
of tuna and tuna products labeled dolphin-safe. We used the SBA's size
standards established at 13 CFR part 121 to define the affected small
entities: fishing vessels, tuna processors, and tuna importers. Using
those standards, fishing vessels with less than $4 million in average
annual receipts, tuna processors with fewer than 500 employees, and
importers with fewer than 100 employees are considered small entities.
U.S. purse seine vessels that fish for tuna destined to become tuna
product are divided into two size groups: (1) Vessels greater than 400
st (362.8 mt) carrying capacity (``large'' vessels); and (2) vessels of
400 st (362.8 mt) carrying capacity or less (``small'' vessels). Large
vessels typically exceed $4 million in annual receipts, whereas small
vessels have less than $4 million in annual receipts and would be
considered small entities. From 2011--2012, the U.S. purse seine fleet,
all of which fished in the Pacific Ocean, averaged 39 large vessels and
7 small vessels. About 1,930 U.S. non-purse seine commercial fishing
vessels are authorized to fish for tuna in the Pacific Ocean per year,
including: (1) vessels under Pacific Highly Migratory Species vessel
permits (about 1,766 vessels); and (2) vessels based in Hawaii and the
U.S. Pacific Islands, under High Seas Fishing Compliance Act permits
(about 175 vessels). All of these are considered small entities in this
analysis, and have less than $4 million in annual receipts.
There are 19 tuna canning manufacturers in the United States. Of
these, 16 are considered small businesses, because they have fewer than
500 employees.
NMFS is unaware of any domestic tuna processor, other than canning
operations, that labels tuna product as dolphin-safe.
There are an estimated 430 U.S. importers of tuna and tuna products
per year. Of these, about 380 importers are considered small
businesses, because they have fewer than 100 employees.
Impacts on Affected Entities
The proposed rule, if implemented, would apply additional
documentation requirements to all three classes of affected entities;
none of these reporting requirements would result in a significant
economic effect. The time needed to gather and submit a written
statement by the captain of the harvesting vessel and by the observer
on board the vessel or by an authorized representative, if applicable,
would be minimal (about 5 minutes each). An additional cost to provide
the written statements would be about $0.10 for each one page written
statement. Moreover, any additional costs to any entity resulting from
this rule will be small (e.g. the cost associated with two pieces of
netting or tarps, etc. for use in storage separation). Accordingly, as
it pertains to the RFA, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. As a result, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
This proposed rule contains two collection-of-information
requirements subject to review and approval by OMB under the PRA under
control numbers 0648-0335 and 0648-0387. Revision of OMB control number
0648-0335, titled ``Fisheries Certificate of Origin,'' if approved,
modifies the dolphin-safe status section of the FCO. The labor and cost
burden due to this proposed rule on control number 0648-0335 is
estimated to affect approximately 13,000 responses annually from 430
respondents. The cost and labor burdens are estimated to increase by
$0.30 and 5 minutes respectively, per response. Revision of OMB control
number 0648-0387, titled ``International Dolphin Conservation
Program,'' if approved, requires information from tuna canners and tuna
processors, other than canners, about the eligibility of tuna to be
labeled dolphin-safe; the gear type used to harvest the tuna; and will
contain certifications required by 50 CFR 216.91. The labor and cost
burden due to this proposed rule on control number 0648-0387 is
estimated to affect approximately 72 responses annually from 19
respondents. The cost and labor burdens are estimated to increase by
$0.50 and 5 minutes respectively, per response. These collections have
been submitted to OMB for approval. Public reporting burden estimates
include the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection information.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed
collection-of-information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection-of-
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection-of-information to NMFS
Southwest Region at the ADDRESSES above, and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection-of-information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection-of-information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 216
Commercial fisheries, Food labeling, Imports, Marine mammals,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seafood.
Dated: April 2, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 216, subpart H
is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 216--REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE TAKING AND IMPORTING OF MARINE
MAMMALS
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 216, subpart H, continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1385
0
2. In Sec. 216.91, revise paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) and (a)(4), and add a
new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 216.91 Dolphin-safe labeling standards.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
[[Page 20609]]
(ii) In any other fishery unless the products are accompanied as
described in Sec. 216.93(d), (e), or (f), as appropriate, by:
(A) A written statement executed by the Captain of the vessel
certifying that no purse seine net was intentionally deployed on or
used to encircle dolphins during the fishing trip in which the tuna
were caught, and that no dolphins were killed or seriously injured in
the sets in which the tuna were caught; and
(B) Where the Assistant Administrator has determined that observers
participating in a national or international observer program are
qualified and authorized to certify that no purse seine net was
intentionally deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during the
fishing trip in which the tuna were caught, and that no dolphins were
killed or seriously injured in the sets in which the tuna were caught,
and where such an observer is on board the vessel, a written statement
executed by the observer, or by an authorized representative of a
nation participating in the observer program based on information from
the observer, certifying that no purse seine net was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught and that no dolphins were killed or
seriously injured in the sets in which the tuna were caught. Any
determination by the Assistant Administrator shall be announced in a
notice published in the Federal Register. Determinations under this
paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(B) will also be publicized on the Web site of the
NMFS Southwest Region (https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/).
* * * * *
(4) Other fisheries. By a vessel in a fishery other than one
described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section unless
such product is accompanied as described in Sec. 216.93(d), (e), or
(f), as appropriate, by:
(i) A written statement executed by the Captain of the vessel
certifying that no dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the
sets or other gear deployments in which the tuna were caught;
(ii) Where the Assistant Administrator has determined that
observers participating in a national or international observer program
are qualified and authorized to certify that no dolphins were killed or
seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments in which the
tuna were caught, and where such an observer is on board the vessel, a
written statement executed by the observer, or by an authorized
representative of a nation participating in the observer program based
on information from the observer, certifying that no dolphins were
killed or seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments in
which the tuna were caught. Any determination by the Assistant
Administrator shall be announced in a notice published in the Federal
Register. Determinations under this subparagraph will also be
publicized on the Web site of the NMFS Southwest Region (https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/); and
(iii) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and
(ii) of this section, in any other fishery that is identified by the
Assistant Administrator as having a regular and significant mortality
or serious injury of dolphins, a written statement executed by an
observer participating in a national or international program
acceptable to the Assistant Administrator, that no dolphins were killed
or seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments in which the
tuna were caught, provided that the Assistant Administrator determines
that such an observer statement is necessary.
(5) All fisheries. On a fishing trip during which any dolphin was
killed or seriously injured, unless the tuna labeled dolphin-safe was
caught in a set or other gear deployment was stored separately from
tuna caught in non-dolphin-safe sets or other gear deployments by the
use of netting, other material, or separate storage areas from the time
of capture through unloading. If a purse seine vessel has more than one
well used to store tuna, all tuna inside a well shall be considered
non-dolphin-safe, if at any time non-dolphin-safe tuna is loaded into
the well, regardless of the use of netting or other material inside the
well.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 216.93 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 216.93 Tracking and verification program.
The Administrator, Southwest Region, has established a national
tracking and verification program to accurately document the dolphin-
safe condition of tuna, under the standards set forth in Sec. Sec.
216.91 and 216.92. The tracking program includes procedures and reports
for use when importing tuna into the United States and during U.S.
fishing, processing, and marketing in the United States and abroad.
Verification of tracking system operations is attained through the
establishment of audit and document review requirements. The tracking
program is consistent with the international tuna tracking and
verification program adopted by the Parties to the Agreement on the
IDCP.
(a) Tuna tracking forms. Whenever a U.S. flag tuna purse seine
vessel of greater than 400 st (362.8 mt) carrying capacity fishes in
the ETP, IDCP approved Tuna Tracking Forms (TTFs), bearing a unique
number assigned to that trip, are used by the observer to record every
set made during that trip. One TTF is used to record dolphin-safe sets
and a second TTF is used to record non-dolphin-safe sets. The
information entered on the TTFs following each set includes the date,
well number, weights by species composition, estimated tons loaded, and
additional notes, if any. The observer and the vessel engineer initial
the entry as soon as possible following each set, and the vessel
captain and observer review and sign both TTFs at the end of the
fishing trip certifying that the information on the forms is accurate.
TTFs are confidential official documents of the IDCP, consistent with
Article XVIII of the Agreement on the IDCP, and the Agreement on the
IDCP Rules of Confidentiality.
(b) Dolphin-safe certification. Upon request, the Office of the
Administrator, Southwest Region, will provide written certification
that tuna harvested by U.S. purse seine vessels greater than 400 st
(362.8 mt) carrying capacity is dolphin-safe, but only if NMFS' review
of the TTFs for the subject trip shows that the tuna for which the
certification is requested is dolphin-safe under the requirements of
the Agreement on the IDCP and U.S. law.
(c) Tracking fishing operations. (1) ETP large purse seine vessel.
In the ETP by a purse seine vessel of greater than 400 st (362.8 mt)
carrying capacity:
(i) During fishing trips, any part of which included fishing in the
ETP, by purse seine vessels greater than 400 st (362.8 mt) carrying
capacity, tuna caught in sets designated as dolphin-safe by the vessel
observer must be stored separately from tuna caught in non-dolphin-safe
sets from the time of capture through unloading. Vessel personnel will
decide into which wells tuna will be loaded. The observer will
initially designate whether each set is dolphin-safe or not, based on
his/her observation of the set. The observer will initially identify a
vessel fish well as dolphin-safe if the first tuna loaded into the well
during a trip was captured in a set in which no dolphin died or was
seriously injured. The observer will initially identify a vessel fish
well as non-dolphin-safe if the first tuna loaded into the well during
a trip was captured in a set in which a dolphin died or was
[[Page 20610]]
seriously injured. Any tuna loaded into a well previously designated
non-dolphin-safe is considered non-dolphin-safe tuna. The observer will
change the designation of a dolphin-safe well to non-dolphin-safe if
any tuna are loaded into the well that were captured in a set in which
a dolphin died or was seriously injured.
(ii) The captain, managing owner, or vessel agent of a U.S. purse
seine vessel greater than 400 st (362.8 mt) returning to port from a
trip, any part of which included fishing in the ETP, must provide at
least 48 hours' notice of the vessel's intended place of landing,
arrival time, and schedule of unloading to the Administrator, Southwest
Region.
(iii) If the trip terminates when the vessel enters port to unload
part or all of its catch, new TTFs will be assigned to the new trip,
and any information concerning tuna retained on the vessel will be
recorded as the first entry on the TTFs for the new trip. If the trip
is not terminated following a partial unloading, the vessel will retain
the original TTFs and submit a copy of those TTFs to the Administrator,
Southwest Region, within 5 working days. In either case, the species
and amount unloaded will be noted on the respective originals.
(iv) Tuna offloaded to trucks, storage facilities, or carrier
vessels must be loaded or stored in such a way as to maintain and
safeguard the identification of the dolphin-safe or non-dolphin-safe
designation of the tuna as it left the fishing vessel.
(v) The handling of TTFs and the tracking and verification of tuna
caught in the Convention Area by a U.S. purse seine vessel greater than
400 st (362.8 mt) carrying capacity shall be conducted consistent with
the international tuna tracking and verification program adopted by the
Parties to the Agreement on the IDCP.
(2) Purse seine vessel other than ETP large purse seine vessel.
This paragraph (c)(2) applies to tuna product labeled dolphin-safe that
includes tuna harvested in the ETP by a purse seine vessel of 400 st
(362.8 mt) or less carrying capacity or by a purse seine vessel outside
the ETP of any carrying capacity.
(i) Tuna caught in sets designated as dolphin-safe must be stored
separately from tuna caught in non-dolphin-safe sets from the time of
capture through unloading. Tuna caught in sets where a dolphin died or
was seriously injured must be stored in a well designated as non-
dolphin-safe by the captain or, where applicable, by a qualified and
authorized observer under Sec. 216.91. Any tuna loaded into a well
previously designated non-dolphin-safe is considered non-dolphin-safe
tuna. The captain or, where applicable, a qualified and authorized
observer under Sec. 216.91, will change the designation of a dolphin-
safe well to non-dolphin-safe if any tuna are loaded into the well that
were captured in a set in which a dolphin died or was seriously
injured. If a purse seine vessel has only one well used to store tuna,
dolphin-safe tuna must be kept physically separate from non-dolphin-
safe tuna by using netting or other material. If a purse seine vessel
has more than one well used to store tuna, all tuna inside a well shall
be considered non-dolphin-safe, if at any time non-dolphin-safe tuna is
loaded into the well, regardless of the use of netting or other
material inside the well.
(ii) Tuna offloaded to trucks, storage facilities, or carrier
vessels must be loaded or stored in such a way as to maintain and
safeguard the identification of the dolphin-safe or non-dolphin-safe
designation of the tuna as it left the fishing vessel.
(3) Other vessels. This paragraph (c)(3) applies to tuna product
labeled dolphin-safe that includes tuna harvested by a vessel other
than ones described in paragraphs (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section:
(i) Tuna caught in sets or other gear deployments designated as
dolphin-safe must be stored separately from tuna caught in non-dolphin-
safe sets or other gear deployments from the time of capture through
unloading. Dolphin-safe tuna must be kept physically separate from non-
dolphin-safe tuna by using netting, other material, or separate storage
areas. The captain or, where applicable, a qualified and authorized
observer under Sec. 216.91, must designate the storage areas for
dolphin-safe and non-dolphin-safe tuna.
(ii) Tuna offloaded to trucks, storage facilities, or carrier
vessels must be loaded or stored in such a way as to maintain and
safeguard the identification of the dolphin-safe or non-dolphin-safe
designation of the tuna as it left the fishing vessel.
(d) Tracking cannery operations. (1) Whenever a U.S. tuna canning
company in the 50 states, Puerto Rico, or American Samoa receives a
domestic or imported shipment of tuna for processing, a NMFS
representative may be present to monitor delivery and verify that
dolphin-safe and non-dolphin-safe tuna are clearly identified and
remain segregated. Such inspections may be scheduled or unscheduled,
and canners must allow the NMFS representative access to all areas and
records.
(2) Tuna processors must submit a report to the Administrator,
Southwest Region, of all tuna received at their processing facilities
in each calendar month whether or not the tuna is actually canned or
stored during that month. Monthly cannery receipt reports must be
submitted electronically or by mail before the last day of the month
following the month being reported. Monthly reports must contain the
following information:
(i) Domestic receipts: whether the tuna is eligible to be labeled
dolphin-safe under Sec. 216.91, species, condition (round, loin,
dressed, gilled and gutted, other), weight in short tons to the fourth
decimal, ocean area of capture (ETP, western Pacific, Indian, eastern
and western Atlantic, other), catcher vessel, gear type, trip dates,
carrier name, unloading dates, and location of unloading. Where the
processor indicates the tuna is eligible to be labeled dolphin-safe
under Sec. 216.91, it must enclose the certifications required by that
section.
(ii) Import receipts: In addition to the information required in
paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section, a copy of the FCO for each
imported receipt must be provided.
(3) Tuna processors must report on a monthly basis the amounts of
ETP-caught tuna that were immediately utilized upon receipt or removed
from cold storage. This report may be submitted in conjunction with the
monthly report required in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. This
report must contain:
(i) The date of removal from cold storage or disposition;
(ii) Storage container or lot identifier number(s) and dolphin-safe
or non-dolphin-safe designation of each container or lot; and
(iii) Details of the disposition of fish (for example, canning,
sale, rejection, etc.).
(4) During canning activities, non-dolphin-safe tuna may not be
mixed in any manner or at any time during processing with any dolphin-
safe tuna or tuna products and may not share the same storage
containers, cookers, conveyers, tables, or other canning and labeling
machinery.
(e) Tracking processor operations other than cannery operations.
U.S. tuna processors other than cannery operations engaged in
processing tuna products, including frozen, dried, or smoked tuna
products, must submit a report to the Administrator, Southwest Region
that includes the information set out in paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3)
of this section on a monthly basis for all tuna received at their
processing
[[Page 20611]]
facilities that will be included in any tuna product labeled dolphin-
safe.
(f) Tracking imports. All tuna products, except fresh tuna, that
are imported into the United States must be accompanied as described in
Sec. 216.24(f)(3) by a properly certified FCO as required by Sec.
216.24(f)(2). For tuna tracking purposes, copies of FCOs and associated
certifications must be submitted by the importer of record to the
Administrator, Southwest Region, within 10 calendar days of the
shipment's entry into the commerce of the United States as required by
Sec. 216.24(f)(3)(ii).
(g) Verification requirements. (1) Record maintenance. Any
exporter, transshipper, importer, processor, or wholesaler/distributor
of any tuna or tuna products must maintain records related to that tuna
for at least 2 years. These records include, but are not limited to:
FCOs and required certifications, any reports required in paragraphs
(a), (b), (d) and (e) of this section, invoices, other import
documents, and trip reports.
(2) Record submission. Within 10 calendar days of receiving a
shipment of tuna or tuna products, any exporter, transshipper,
importer, processor, or wholesaler/distributor of tuna or tuna products
must submit to the Administrator, Southwest Region, all corresponding
FCOs and required certifications for those tuna or tuna products.
(3) Audits and spot checks. Upon request of the Administrator,
Southwest Region, any exporter, transshipper, importer, processor, or
wholesaler/distributor of tuna or tuna products must provide the
Administrator, Southwest Region, timely access to all pertinent records
and facilities to allow for audits and spot-checks on caught, landed,
stored, and processed tuna.
(h) Confidentiality of proprietary information. Information
submitted to the Assistant Administrator under this section will be
treated as confidential in accordance with NOAA Administrative Order
216-100 ``Protection of Confidential Fisheries Statistics.''
[FR Doc. 2013-07990 Filed 4-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P