Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Pelican Island Causeway, Galveston, Channel, TX, 20451-20454 [2013-07908]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
require their investigative units to
communicate with their servicing SARC
and participate with the multidisciplinary Case Management Group
convened by the SARC, in accordance
with this part and DoDI 6495.02.
(19) Provide commanders with
procedures that:
(i) Establish guidance for when a
Military Protective Order (MPO) has
been issued, that the Service member
who is protected by the order is
informed, in a timely manner, of the
member’s option to request transfer
from the command to which that
member is assigned in accordance with
section 567(c) of Public Law 111–84.
(ii) Ensure that the appropriate
civilian authorities shall be notified of
the issuance of an military protective
order (MPO) and of the individuals
involved in the order, when an MPO has
been issued against a Service member or
when any individual addressed in the
MPO does not reside on a military
installation at any time when an MPO
is in effect. An MPO issued by a military
commander shall remain in effect until
such time as the commander terminates
the order or issues a replacement order.
(See section 561 of Pub. L.110–417.) The
issuing commander also shall notify the
appropriate civilian authorities of any
change made in a protective order
covered by Chapter 80 of Title 10,
U.S.C., and the termination of the
protective order.
(iii) Ensure that the person seeking
the MPO shall be advised that the MPO
is not enforceable by civilian authorities
off base and that victims desiring
protection off base are advised to seek
a civilian protective order (see section
561 of 110–417 and section 567(c) of
Pub. L. 111–84).
(g) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff shall:
(1) Assess SAPR as part of the overall
force planning function of any force
deployment decision, and periodically
reassess the SAPR posture of deployed
forces.
(2) Monitor implementation of this
part, DoDI 6495.02, and implementing
instructions, including during military
operations.
(3) Utilize the terms ‘‘Sexual Assault
Response Coordinator (SARC)’’ and
‘‘SAPR Victim Advocate (VA),’’ as
defined in this part and DoDI 6495.02,
as standard terms to facilitate
communications and transparency
regarding sexual assault response
capacity.
(4) Review relevant documents,
including the Combatant Commanders’
joint plans, operational plans, concept
plans, and deployment orders, to ensure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
they identify and include SAPR
Program requirements.
(h) The Commanders of the
Combatant Commands, in coordination
with the other Heads of the DoD
Components and through the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall:
(1) Establish policies and procedures
to implement the SAPR Program and
oversee compliance with this part and
DoDI 6495.02 within their areas of
responsibility and during military
operations.
(2) Formally document agreements
with installation host Service
commanders, component theater
commanders, or other heads of another
agency or organization, for investigative,
legal, medical, counseling, or other
response support provided to incidents
of sexual assault.
(3) Direct that relevant documents are
drafted, including joint operational
plans and deployment orders, that
establish theater-level requirements for
the prevention of and response to
incidents of sexual assault that occur, to
include during the time of military
operations.
(4) Require that sexual assault
response capability information be
provided to all persons within their area
of responsibility covered by this part
and DoDI 6495.02, to include reporting
options and SAPR services available at
deployed locations and how to access
these options.
(5) Ensure medical treatment
(including emergency care) and SAPR
services are provided to victims of
sexual assaults in a timely manner
unless declined by the victim.
(6) Direct subordinate commanders
coordinate relationships and agreements
for host or installation support at
forward-deployed locations to ensure a
sexual assault response capability is
available to members of their command
and persons covered by this part and
DoDI 6495.02 as consistent with
operational requirements.
(7) Direct that sexual assault incidents
are given priority so that they shall be
treated as emergency cases.
(8) Direct subordinate commanders
provide all personnel with procedures
to report sexual assaults.
(9) Require subordinate commanders
at all levels to monitor the command
climate with respect to SAPR, and take
appropriate steps to address problems.
(10) Require that SAPR training for
DoD personnel and specialized training
for commanders, senior enlisted leaders,
SARCs, SAPR VAs, investigators, law
enforcement officials, chaplains,
healthcare personnel, and legal
personnel be conducted prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20451
deployment in accordance with DoDI
6495.02.
(11) Direct subordinate commanders
to develop procedures that:
(i) Establish guidance for when an
MPO has been issued, that the Service
member who is protected by the order
is informed, in a timely manner, of the
member’s option to request transfer
from the command to which that
member is assigned in accordance with
section 567(c) of Public Law 111–84.
(ii) In OCONUS areas, if appropriate,
direct that the appropriate civilian
authorities be notified of the issuance of
an MPO and of the individuals involved
in an order when an MPO has been
issued against a Service member or
when any individual involved in the
MPO does not reside on a military
installation when an MPO is in effect.
An MPO issued by a military
commander shall remain in effect until
such time as the commander terminates
the order or issues a replacement order.
(See section 561 of Pub. L. 110–417.)
The issuing commander also shall notify
the appropriate civilian authorities of
any change made in a protective order
covered by Chapter 80 of Title 10,
U.S.C. and the termination of the
protective order.
(iii) Ensure that the person seeking
the MPO is advised that the MPO is not
enforceable by civilian authorities off
base and victims desiring protection off
base should be advised to seek a civilian
protective order in that jurisdiction
pursuant to section 562 of Public Law
110–417.
(i) The Director, DoDHRA, shall
provide operational support to the
USD(P&R) as outlined in paragraph
(a)(6) of this section.
Dated: March 18, 2013.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison, Department of
Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–07803 Filed 4–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0063]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Pelican Island Causeway, Galveston,
Channel, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
20452
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast Guard is
temporarily changing the operating
schedule that governs the Pelican Island
Causeway bridge across Galveston
Channel mile 4.5 (GIWW mile 356.1), at
Galveston, Texas. The temporary change
to the regulations will allow the bridge
to remain closed to navigation while
major repairs are conducted to the
mechanical portions of the bascule
span. Failure to complete the repairs in
a timely manner may render the bridge
completely inoperable for the passage of
vessel traffic.
DATES: This temporary final rule is
effective from May 6, 2013, until July 8,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–0063. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email David Frank, Bridge
Administration Branch, Coast Guard;
telephone 504–671–2128, email
David.M.Frank@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
cause exists for not publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule. Publishing an
NRPM is impracticable because the
severity of damage and subsequent
repairs necessary for this bridge were
not known until recently. In this case
because the scheduled repair work
involved requires the bridge to be closed
to navigation throughout the repair
period, failure to allow the repair work
to proceed as expeditiously as possible
may render the bridge inoperable due to
a catastrophic failure of the machinery
that opens and closes the bridge. If this
were to occur, the bridge would have to
be closed for a much longer period of
time while the machinery failures are
repaired. Further, while this closure
will prevent certain vessels from
passing under the bridge, vessels will be
able to transit an alternate route around
the island through the Galveston
Channel, an additional distance of up to
three miles.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Pelican Island Causeway bridge,
Galveston Channel mile 4.5 (GIWW mile
356.1), at Galveston, Texas, is a bascule
bridge connecting Galveston Island with
Pelican Island in Galveston, Texas. The
roadway is the only land route between
the two islands and is a vital link to
numerous facilities and to the Texas
A&M University Galveston Maritime
School. A recent inspection by the
Texas Department of Transportation and
the Federal Highway Administration
has determined that the ‘‘rocker
segmental girder tracks’’ that allow the
bridge to open and close are severely
damaged and in need of immediate
repair. Due to the advanced age of the
bridge, replacement parts are
unavailable and the existing parts will
have to be removed and molds will have
to be made to manufacture replacement
parts.
Presently, in accordance with 33 CFR
117.966, the draw of the Pelican Island
Causeway bridge across Galveston
Channel, mile 4.5 of the Galveston
Channel, (GIWW mile 356.1) at
Galveston, Texas, shall open on signal;
except that, from 6:40 a.m. to 8:10 a.m.,
12 noon to 1 p.m., and 4:15 p.m. to 5:15
p.m. Monday through Friday except
Federal holidays, the draw need not be
opened for passage of vessels. Public
vessels of the United States and vessels
in distress shall be passed at any time.
Vessel traffic consists of mainly small
tows and supply vessels, recreational
boats and some commercial shrimpers.
The bridge opens approximately 7 times
per day for the passage of vessels. The
vertical clearance of the bridge in the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
closed to navigation position is 13 feet
above mean high water.
Approximately 4000 vehicles cross
the bridge in each direction daily. This
includes students, factory and shipyard
workers and delivery vehicles of all
types.
Failure to complete the repairs in a
timely manner may cause a catastrophic
failure of the bridge requiring a longer
closure of the bridge to effect repairs.
Presently, TXDOT has issued a contract
for the repairs and the contractor is set
to begin on May 6, 2013. The Corps of
Engineers, the Port of Galveston,
waterway users and the Coast Guard
discussed the need for the closure with
the bridge owner, TXDOT, FHWA, and
the contractor to discuss ways to
minimize the effects on navigation and
understand the need for the work. These
parties also acknowledge the fact that
marine traffic can transit around the
island through the Galveston Channel,
an additional distance of up to three
miles, with little or no interruption to
their services.
C. Discussion of Temporary Final Rule
The temporary final rule will allow
the bridge to be left in the closed-tonavigation position and jacked up to
facilitate the removal of the rocker
segmental girder track for repair/
replacement of the damaged parts of the
track. Removal of the track renders the
bridge inoperable with regards to
opening for the passage of vessels. This
rule is effective from 6 a.m. on May 6,
2013, until 6 a.m. on July 8, 2014.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The
Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under those Orders.
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action because it has been
coordinated with those parties affected
by the closure and it is understood that
the work is necessary for the continued
operation of the bridge and by allowing
it to happen in a timely manner, it
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
further reduces the possibility of
catastrophic failure of the movable
bridge. Additionally, this closure will
not significantly impact navigation in
the area as marine traffic may transit
around the island through the Galveston
Channel, an additional distance of up to
three miles.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels with vertical clearance
requirements of greater than 13 feet
intending to transit beneath the bridge
from 6 a.m. on May 6, 2013, until 6 a.m.
on July 8, 2014.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: The bridge closure
will prevent certain vessels from
transiting beneath it; however, those
vessels may safely transit around the
island through the Galveston Channel,
an additional distance of up to three
miles.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
20453
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
allowing a movable bridge to remain
closed to navigation for 14 months and
will not have any impact on the
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
20454
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Effective 6 a.m. on May 6, 2013,
until 6 a.m. on July 8, 2014, suspend
§ 117.966.
■ 3. Add § 117.T966 to read as follows:
■
§ 117.T966 Pelican Island Causeway,
Galveston Channel
The draw of the Pelican Island
Causeway bridge across Galveston
Channel, mile 4.5 of the Galveston
Channel, (GIWW mile 356.1) at
Galveston, Texas, need not open for the
passage of vessels. This rule is effective
from 6 a.m. on May 6, 2013, until 6 a.m.
on July 8, 2014.
Dated: March 22, 2013.
Roy A. Nash,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays and the U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 2420
South Lincoln Memorial Drive,
Milwaukee, WI 53207, between 8 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, contact
MST1 Joseph McCollum, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–
7148 or by email at
Joseph.P.McCollum@USCG.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
[FR Doc. 2013–07908 Filed 4–4–13; 8:45 am]
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0020]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Events
Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is amending
its regulations requiring safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
zone. This rule will amend the rules
that restrict vessels from portions of
water areas during events that pose a
hazard to public safety. The safety zones
amended or established by this rule are
necessary to protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with various
maritime events.
DATES: This rule is effective May 6,
2013.
SUMMARY:
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket USCG–2013–0020 and are
available online at www.regulations.gov.
This material is also available for
inspection or copying at two locations:
The Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 Apr 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
A. Regulatory History and Information
On February 11, 2013, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled Safety Zones;
Annual Events Requiring Safety Zones
in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
Zone in the Federal Register (2013–
02955). We received 4 comments on the
proposed rule. All of the 4 comments
received were from event organizers,
detailing minor changes to the date,
time, or location of the event listed in
the NPRM. These comments are
addressed specifically within this final
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
This rule will amend 33 CFR 165.929,
Annual Events requiring safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
zone. Specifically, this rule will remove
1 permanent safety zone, revise the
location and/or enforcement period of
11 others, and add 3 permanent safety
zones for annually recurring events.
Changes to existing safety zones in 33
CFR 165.929 correlate to changes to
annual marine events for which these
safety zones are established. Event
organizers report changes to annual
marine events to the Coast Guard, and
in light of these reports, the Coast Guard
adjusts the position and/or enforcement
period of the established safety zones to
ensure that vessels and persons are
protected from the specific hazards of
these marine events. Such hazards
include obstructions to the waterway,
collisions among spectators and event
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
participants, and falling debris. Six of
the 11 revisions to the location and/or
enforcement period of safety zones
concerned reported changes to annually
occurring fireworks displays.
Additionally, the Coast Guard was
informed by one Event Organizer that a
fireworks display listed in 33 CFR
165.929 would no longer take place. For
this reason, the removal of its
accompanying safety zone was
necessary.
The Coast Guard also added three
new safety zones for events that have
been reported as recurring in the Lake
Michigan Zone. The last three entries
within this rule have been added for
races in the Chicago, IL area and on
Spring Lake, MI. For the reader’s
convenience, we have republished the
revised 33 CFR 165.929 in its entirety.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Final Rule
Four comments were received
regarding the safety zones listed within
the NPRM. Each comment called for a
minor position or time change to what
was listed in the NPRM. In support for
amending the event as listed in the
NPRM, the Coast Guard considered that
making minor edits to the times and
locations would both provide the public
with the most accurate information, and
protect the public from the hazards
associated with each event.
The first comment received regarded
33 CFR 165.929(37). The comment was
from the organizer of the event for
which the safety zone was written—
Celebrate Americafest/Fire over the Fox.
This event has historically involved
both a fireworks display and a ski show.
The event organizer commented that the
safety zone, as written in the NPRM,
would need to be extended 1300 feet to
the southwest and enforced for two
hours in the early afternoon on the day
of the event. To ensure the safety of the
Celebrate Americafest/Fire over the Fox
event in its entirety, the language of 33
CFR 165.929(37) was amended to reflect
these changes. The language of 33 CFR
165.929(37) was also amended to reflect
the times and locations of the safety
zone for ski show and fireworks.
The second comment received
regarded 33 CFR 165.929(16). The
comment was from the organizer of the
event for which the safety zone was
written—Freedom Festival Fireworks.
The event organizer commented by
sending a picture to show the launch
position of the fireworks; this position
differed from what had been listed in
the NPRM for the event. This new
position was only 650 feet south of its
position within the NPRM. The
language of 33 CFR 165.929(16) was
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20451-20454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07908]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0063]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Pelican Island Causeway,
Galveston, Channel, TX
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20452]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the operating schedule
that governs the Pelican Island Causeway bridge across Galveston
Channel mile 4.5 (GIWW mile 356.1), at Galveston, Texas. The temporary
change to the regulations will allow the bridge to remain closed to
navigation while major repairs are conducted to the mechanical portions
of the bascule span. Failure to complete the repairs in a timely manner
may render the bridge completely inoperable for the passage of vessel
traffic.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from May 6, 2013, until
July 8, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0063. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, Coast Guard; telephone 504-671-2128, email
David.M.Frank@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. Publishing an NRPM is impracticable because
the severity of damage and subsequent repairs necessary for this bridge
were not known until recently. In this case because the scheduled
repair work involved requires the bridge to be closed to navigation
throughout the repair period, failure to allow the repair work to
proceed as expeditiously as possible may render the bridge inoperable
due to a catastrophic failure of the machinery that opens and closes
the bridge. If this were to occur, the bridge would have to be closed
for a much longer period of time while the machinery failures are
repaired. Further, while this closure will prevent certain vessels from
passing under the bridge, vessels will be able to transit an alternate
route around the island through the Galveston Channel, an additional
distance of up to three miles.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Pelican Island Causeway bridge, Galveston Channel mile 4.5
(GIWW mile 356.1), at Galveston, Texas, is a bascule bridge connecting
Galveston Island with Pelican Island in Galveston, Texas. The roadway
is the only land route between the two islands and is a vital link to
numerous facilities and to the Texas A&M University Galveston Maritime
School. A recent inspection by the Texas Department of Transportation
and the Federal Highway Administration has determined that the ``rocker
segmental girder tracks'' that allow the bridge to open and close are
severely damaged and in need of immediate repair. Due to the advanced
age of the bridge, replacement parts are unavailable and the existing
parts will have to be removed and molds will have to be made to
manufacture replacement parts.
Presently, in accordance with 33 CFR 117.966, the draw of the
Pelican Island Causeway bridge across Galveston Channel, mile 4.5 of
the Galveston Channel, (GIWW mile 356.1) at Galveston, Texas, shall
open on signal; except that, from 6:40 a.m. to 8:10 a.m., 12 noon to 1
p.m., and 4:15 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays, the draw need not be opened for passage of vessels. Public
vessels of the United States and vessels in distress shall be passed at
any time.
Vessel traffic consists of mainly small tows and supply vessels,
recreational boats and some commercial shrimpers. The bridge opens
approximately 7 times per day for the passage of vessels. The vertical
clearance of the bridge in the closed to navigation position is 13 feet
above mean high water.
Approximately 4000 vehicles cross the bridge in each direction
daily. This includes students, factory and shipyard workers and
delivery vehicles of all types.
Failure to complete the repairs in a timely manner may cause a
catastrophic failure of the bridge requiring a longer closure of the
bridge to effect repairs. Presently, TXDOT has issued a contract for
the repairs and the contractor is set to begin on May 6, 2013. The
Corps of Engineers, the Port of Galveston, waterway users and the Coast
Guard discussed the need for the closure with the bridge owner, TXDOT,
FHWA, and the contractor to discuss ways to minimize the effects on
navigation and understand the need for the work. These parties also
acknowledge the fact that marine traffic can transit around the island
through the Galveston Channel, an additional distance of up to three
miles, with little or no interruption to their services.
C. Discussion of Temporary Final Rule
The temporary final rule will allow the bridge to be left in the
closed-to-navigation position and jacked up to facilitate the removal
of the rocker segmental girder track for repair/replacement of the
damaged parts of the track. Removal of the track renders the bridge
inoperable with regards to opening for the passage of vessels. This
rule is effective from 6 a.m. on May 6, 2013, until 6 a.m. on July 8,
2014.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders.
This rule is not a significant regulatory action because it has
been coordinated with those parties affected by the closure and it is
understood that the work is necessary for the continued operation of
the bridge and by allowing it to happen in a timely manner, it
[[Page 20453]]
further reduces the possibility of catastrophic failure of the movable
bridge. Additionally, this closure will not significantly impact
navigation in the area as marine traffic may transit around the island
through the Galveston Channel, an additional distance of up to three
miles.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels with vertical
clearance requirements of greater than 13 feet intending to transit
beneath the bridge from 6 a.m. on May 6, 2013, until 6 a.m. on July 8,
2014.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The
bridge closure will prevent certain vessels from transiting beneath it;
however, those vessels may safely transit around the island through the
Galveston Channel, an additional distance of up to three miles.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves allowing a movable bridge to remain
closed to navigation for 14 months and will not have any impact on the
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 20454]]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Effective 6 a.m. on May 6, 2013, until 6 a.m. on July 8, 2014,
suspend Sec. 117.966.
0
3. Add Sec. 117.T966 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.T966 Pelican Island Causeway, Galveston Channel
The draw of the Pelican Island Causeway bridge across Galveston
Channel, mile 4.5 of the Galveston Channel, (GIWW mile 356.1) at
Galveston, Texas, need not open for the passage of vessels. This rule
is effective from 6 a.m. on May 6, 2013, until 6 a.m. on July 8, 2014.
Dated: March 22, 2013.
Roy A. Nash,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-07908 Filed 4-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P