Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Ohio Ambient Air Quality Standards; Correction, 19990-19991 [2013-07649]
Download as PDF
19990
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and
local, state, and federal law enforcement
vessels who have been authorized to act
on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander may be contacted on VHF–
FM Channel 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: March 20, 2013.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2013–07745 Filed 4–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0807; FRL–9783–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Ohio Ambient Air Quality Standards;
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
This document corrects an
error in the codification in an October
26, 2010, final rule under the Clean Air
Act. This rule approved revisions to
Ohio regulations that consolidated air
quality standards in a new chapter of
rules and adjusted the rule references
accordingly in various related rules. Of
particular note is a revision that
adjusted the provision for
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Apr 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
measurements for comparison with the
particulate matter air quality standards.
EPA erroneously codified approval of
the entirety of the rule, which may be
misread as having inadvertently
approved several other provisions
which were not addressed in the
October 26, 2010 final rule, and which
EPA in separate rulemaking had
proposed to disapprove. Therefore, EPA
is correcting its action to clarify the
codification to show that only one
paragraph of this rule was approved.
This action simply makes the
codification consistent with the
approval.
This final rule is effective on
April 3, 2013.
DATES:
John
Summerhays, Environmental Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6067,
summerhays.john@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On
October 26, 2010, EPA published a final
approval of Ohio rules consolidating the
State’s air quality standards into Ohio
Administrative Code (OAC) 3745–25
and modifying an assortment of related
rules, mostly providing test methods for
measurements used to assess attainment
of those standards, so that these related
rules would properly reference the
relocated air quality standard rules. This
action was published at 75 FR 65572 as
a direct final rule.
In codifying the approval of these
rules, EPA erroneously appeared to
approve the entirety of the modified
rules, even though in some cases only
one paragraph was addressed or
modified. OAC 3745–17–03 included
pertinent revisions in paragraph (A)
specifying test methods for the
particulate matter air quality standards.
However, OAC 3745–17–03 also
included numerous unrelated revisions
that had not been previously approved,
most notably including revisions that
EPA had proposed to disapprove (see 70
FR 36901, published June 27, 2005).
EPA’s notice of direct final rulemaking
published October 26, 2010, provided
no discussion of the issues related to the
other sections of OAC 3745–17–03,
reflecting the fact that EPA intended
only to approve and codify the revisions
in OAC 3745–17–03(A). Therefore, EPA
today is correcting the codification for
that action to indicate that only OAC
3745–17–03(A) of that rule is approved.
This makes the codification match the
approval.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Correction
In the codification published in the
Federal Register on October 26, 2010
(75 FR 65572), on page 65574 in the
second column, the paragraph
numbered (c)(138)(i)(A), erroneously
reading: ‘‘Ohio Administrative Code
Rule 3745–17–03 ‘Measurement
methods and procedures.’, effective
April 18, 2009,’’ is corrected to read:
‘‘Paragraph (A) of Ohio Administrative
Code Rule 3745–17–03, ‘Measurement
methods and procedures.’, effective
April 18, 2009.’’
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. EPA
has determined that there is good cause
for making today’s rule final without
prior proposal and opportunity for
comment because EPA is merely
correcting an incorrect codification in a
previous action. The corrected
codification reflects the revisions that
EPA approved in its direct final rule.
We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Thus, notice
and opportunity for public comment are
unnecessary.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a ‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
E:\FR\FM\03APR1.SGM
03APR1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of April 3,
2013. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Apr 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR 52 for Ohio is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 11, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.1870 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(151)(i)(A) to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.1870
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(151) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Paragraph (A) of Ohio
Administrative Code Rule 3745–17–03,
‘‘Measurement methods and
procedures.’’, effective April 18, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–07649 Filed 4–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0954; FRL–9796–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets for the
Pennsylvania Counties in the
Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA–NJ–DE
1997 Fine Particulate Matter
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania). The
revision consists of an update to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19991
SIP-approved Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets (MVEBs) for the Pennsylvania
counties in the PhiladelphiaWilmington, PA–NJ–DE 1997 fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment
area (hereafter referred to as the
Philadelphia Area) to reflect the use of
the most recent version of the Motor
Vehicle Emission Simulator model
(MOVES). The Pennsylvania counties
impacted by this revision are:
Philadelphia, Montgomery, Delaware,
Chester, and Bucks Counties. EPA is
approving this revision to the MVEBs
and thereby making them available for
transportation conformity purposes in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0954. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality
Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Asrah Khadr, (215) 814–2071, or by
email at khadr.asrah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On February 15, 2013 (78 FR 11122),
EPA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPR) for Pennsylvania.
The NPR proposed approval of the
MVEBs for the Philadelphia Area. On
November 6, 2012, the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP) submitted to EPA a draft SIP
revision which updates the Philadelphia
Area’s MVEBs to reflect the use of the
MOVES model. On January 29, 2013,
Pennsylvania DEP submitted its formal,
final SIP revision to update the
E:\FR\FM\03APR1.SGM
03APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19990-19991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07649]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0807; FRL-9783-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Ohio; Ohio Ambient Air Quality Standards; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the codification in an
October 26, 2010, final rule under the Clean Air Act. This rule
approved revisions to Ohio regulations that consolidated air quality
standards in a new chapter of rules and adjusted the rule references
accordingly in various related rules. Of particular note is a revision
that adjusted the provision for measurements for comparison with the
particulate matter air quality standards. EPA erroneously codified
approval of the entirety of the rule, which may be misread as having
inadvertently approved several other provisions which were not
addressed in the October 26, 2010 final rule, and which EPA in separate
rulemaking had proposed to disapprove. Therefore, EPA is correcting its
action to clarify the codification to show that only one paragraph of
this rule was approved. This action simply makes the codification
consistent with the approval.
DATES: This final rule is effective on April 3, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Summerhays, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6067,
summerhays.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 26, 2010, EPA published a final
approval of Ohio rules consolidating the State's air quality standards
into Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745-25 and modifying an assortment
of related rules, mostly providing test methods for measurements used
to assess attainment of those standards, so that these related rules
would properly reference the relocated air quality standard rules. This
action was published at 75 FR 65572 as a direct final rule.
In codifying the approval of these rules, EPA erroneously appeared
to approve the entirety of the modified rules, even though in some
cases only one paragraph was addressed or modified. OAC 3745-17-03
included pertinent revisions in paragraph (A) specifying test methods
for the particulate matter air quality standards. However, OAC 3745-17-
03 also included numerous unrelated revisions that had not been
previously approved, most notably including revisions that EPA had
proposed to disapprove (see 70 FR 36901, published June 27, 2005).
EPA's notice of direct final rulemaking published October 26, 2010,
provided no discussion of the issues related to the other sections of
OAC 3745-17-03, reflecting the fact that EPA intended only to approve
and codify the revisions in OAC 3745-17-03(A). Therefore, EPA today is
correcting the codification for that action to indicate that only OAC
3745-17-03(A) of that rule is approved. This makes the codification
match the approval.
Correction
In the codification published in the Federal Register on October
26, 2010 (75 FR 65572), on page 65574 in the second column, the
paragraph numbered (c)(138)(i)(A), erroneously reading: ``Ohio
Administrative Code Rule 3745-17-03 `Measurement methods and
procedures.', effective April 18, 2009,'' is corrected to read:
``Paragraph (A) of Ohio Administrative Code Rule 3745-17-03,
`Measurement methods and procedures.', effective April 18, 2009.''
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because EPA is merely correcting
an incorrect codification in a previous action. The corrected
codification reflects the revisions that EPA approved in its direct
final rule. We find that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B). Thus, notice and opportunity for public comment are
unnecessary.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and
[[Page 19991]]
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This
rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of April 3,
2013. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to 40 CFR 52 for Ohio
is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 11, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 52.1870 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(151)(i)(A) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.1870 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(151) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Paragraph (A) of Ohio Administrative Code Rule 3745-17-03,
``Measurement methods and procedures.'', effective April 18, 2009.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-07649 Filed 4-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P